Open Collections

BC Historical Books

BC Historical Books

BC Historical Books

Memorial to the government and Parliament of Canada of Malcolm MacLeod, Q.C., &c., for indemnity for… McLeod, Malcolm, 1821-1899 1889

Item Metadata

Download

Media
bcbooks-1.0222282.pdf
Metadata
JSON: bcbooks-1.0222282.json
JSON-LD: bcbooks-1.0222282-ld.json
RDF/XML (Pretty): bcbooks-1.0222282-rdf.xml
RDF/JSON: bcbooks-1.0222282-rdf.json
Turtle: bcbooks-1.0222282-turtle.txt
N-Triples: bcbooks-1.0222282-rdf-ntriples.txt
Original Record: bcbooks-1.0222282-source.json
Full Text
bcbooks-1.0222282-fulltext.txt
Citation
bcbooks-1.0222282.ris

Full Text

Array MEMORIAL
Government and Parliament of Canada
MALCOLM MacLEOD, Q.C. &c,
For Indemnity for Service
In   Initiating the   Canadian   Pacific   Railway 
OTTAWA:
Printed by A. S. Woodburn, Elgin STREET.
1889.  
MEMORIAL
— TO THE —
Government and Parliament of Canada
MALCOLM MacLEOD, Q. C. &c,
For Indemnity for Service
In  Initiating the Canadian  Pacific  Railway,
&c. 
OTTAWA:
Printed bt A. S. Woodburn, "Elgin Street.
1889.  Memorial of Malcolm MacLeofl, Q.C., ftc.
To His Excellency the Right Honourable Loed Stanley, of
Preston, &c, &c, Governor-General of the Dominion
of Canada :
To the Honourable The Senate of Canada :
To the Honourable The House of Commons of Canada :
The Undersigned Memorialist respectfully represents:
That on the 19th May, 1871, while deeply engaged in practice at the Bar in Aylmer in the Province of Quebec, he was, by
telegram from Mr. Sandford Fleming, the Engineer in Chief
charged by the Government of Canada with the work of survey
of a Pacific railway across the continent, solicited to aid him in
starting the preliminary survey for it—" expenses to be paid."
Paper B in appendix to this is a copy of the telegram—the
original being attached to the memorialist's petition to His
Excellency the Governor-General in Council in this matter.
That thereupon, under a sense of the paramount importance
and urgency of the matter, the memorialist at once responded ;
giving, in the course of repeated personal attendances at the office
of Mr, Fleming, in Ottawa, a mass of information from personal
knowledge and from private journals, and other papers of the
memorialist's father, the late Chief Trader John McLeod, senior,
an officer and partner in trade of the Hudson's Bay Company,
and also journals and plans of his associate and successor in British Columbia, the late Chief Factor Archibald McDonald.
That this information was as to parts of British Columbia
that had never been surveyed, nor even cursorily explored and
officially or otherwise reported on.
That, however, it proved full and definite enough to enable
Mr. Fleming to, at once, give intelligent and practical instructions
to his survey parties in that region.
That the exceptional and " extreme " value, at the juncture
of that information is attested to in the accompanying papers A
and E, viz., certificates from Mr. Fleming, and the late Sir James
Douglas, Governor of British Columbia. That that information gave three definite feasible routes
across British Columbia, viz., from the Yellow-Head Pass to the
mouth of the Fraser River, and from the same Pass to the
Bentinck Arm (Bellacoola), and a northern route, infinitely easier
and very little longer, via the Peace River Pass to Port Simpson
at the mouth of the Skeena. As to reaching Vancouver's Island
by continuous rail, the difficulty, and apparent impossibility of
such a project was shown by the memorialist as the result of
previous explorations in which he had been personally interested.
That in connection with the above information, Mr. Fleming
suggested to the memorialist that it would be well for the scheme
and in the public interest, for the memorialist to publish it.
This, the memorialist at once, did in the Brochure (a book of about
120 closely printed pages), with a valuable map, by Arrowsmith,
from the Hudson's Bay Company's private charts—best authority
on the subject.
The preparation-—hurried and difficult at the time with a
sacrifice of much profitable professional duties—cost the memorialist a great deal.
Nothing was stated or agreed on as to the cost of publication.
The work, from its nature—a sort of blue book, with dry statistical details—was not calculated for general reading, and sale, and
was more for distribution where it might benefit the scheme. A
few copies were sold by the publisher—say about 50 out of the
issue of 500: the rest were bought by the memorialist from the
publisher at a cost of about two hundred and fifty dollars, and
were gratuitously distributed by him so beneficially as to enlist
the first responsible promoters of the scheme, and inspire a practical degree of confidence in it. The facts on this point, though
generally known, and privately, from highest quarters, acknowledged and commended, have never been publicly stated; and
the memorialist is reluctant to enter upon any exposition in this
relation. Suffice it for the present, on this head, to refer to the
authoritative statements (certificate ad hoc) of Mr. Fleming—
paper A, annexed, and other accompanying certificates, &c.
That these statements also allude to the special value of the
memorialist's information—as subsequently found to be correct—
of the extraordinary fertility and fitness for settlement and
economic development of the vast region beyond the so-called
" Fertile Belt" of the Saskatchewan.
That the memorialist was the first to draw notice to this fact.
That that fact, as Mr. Fleming says in his said certificate, " cer-
" tainly weighed very heavily in the scales when the question of
" the route of the Pacific Railway was under consideration." That in fact the enormous extension of wheat field—certainly
over three hundred thousand square miles,—thereby indicated as
field and financial basis for railway in question, contributed much
to the initiation and successful promotion of the scheme. That
on this point the memorialist has the strongest assurance, in
thanks, in writing from London, from the delegation of directorate
then there to float the scheme.
That at the time—after some years of political struggle —
when it was finally floated, it was so, largely, on the predicates of
the memorialist in the above and other pamphlets as to the extended economic resources, northward and westward, of the
regions in question. That these predicates have been since confirmed by the explorations of scientists, viz., Professors Macoun
and Selwyn, and Dr. Dawson of the Geological Staff, and by
other official experts. That on this point reference may be made
to annexed exhibits A, C, G and K.
That on the change of Ministry in the Government late in
1873, when the project was condemned in strongest terms, on all
hands, in Parliament, press, and public platform, on the part of
those opposed to the Conservative Party, and even by some who
had belonged to it, the memorialist, on seeing no defence of it in
press or otherwise, called the notice of some of the leading Conservative press to the fact of such default. That their answer
(editors) was, in effect, " We have not the facts, and cannot
" grapple the thing; do it yourself, you have the facts." He
did accordingly : hence the numerous " Britannicus " letters and
pamphlets in 1874-8—till the return of the Conservative Ministry.
That during all that time the memorialist was—so far as he
knows—the only writer in the public press in support of a continuous transcontinental railway, in Canada. All the pamphlets
he published on the subject (five or six) were so at his own cost,
and were distributed by him in England and Australia as well as
in Canada, at his own cost. He is free to admit that he did so on
his own responsibility—and, in the general hopelessness of the
project and condemnation of it in the public mind, as first essayed,
without a word or iota of support save the gratuitous freedom of
an almost despairing press.
That these writings, under the signature " Britannicus,"
found general acceptance in the Conservative press. That the
writer confined himself strictly to facts known to him, advancing
thereon predicates which were irrefutable, and have since proved
true and well founded. That no other public writer, in Canada,
England or elsewhere, seemed to be in a position, from want of
knowledge of the hitherto unknown material facts to be dealt
with, to intelligently advocate the cause. 6
That the service was virtually beneficial to the scheme is, on
all hands, and even in foreign historical record, incontrovertibly
admitted. On this head reference may be made to the annexed
papers generally, v herein will be found a consensus of such fact.
That that service was, in a sense, a continuing act of the
engagement of 19th May, 1871. Be that as it may, the memorialist has not received any payment or compensation in any way,
directly nor indirectly, from the Government or any one else for
the service from first to last. That its incidental outlay amounts
to at least seven hundred dollars, of which he gave details with
his petition of 1883.
That apart from the above matter of railway, &c, the
memorialist has, in years long gone bye, done special service for
the State in the consolidation of the Hudson's Bay and North
West Territories and also British Columbia in the Dominion of
Canada. These services extend back about thirty years. They
are of official and historical record as indicated in annexed paper
O, and are, moreover, specially alluded to in the certificates of
Mr. Fleming and of Ex-Lieutenant Governors Morris and Masson,
and Governor Douglas, herewith produced.
That also in 1869 when the first Red River Troubles
occurred, as referred to in His Honour Ex-Lieutenant Governor
A. Morris' letter—Exhibit C annexed, with note D in explanation
—the memorialist, with considerable trouble to himself, was the
means of enabling the Government—in its surprise—to meet the
difficulty in the best way possible under the circumstances. For
this also, the memorialist holds the note of thanks, from the
Minister of the Crown (the late Honourable Mr. Howe), through
whom the information was given and suggestion was respectfully
proffered.
That there are also various other services at the instance and
call of the Government or Parliament, which the memorialist has
rendered to the Government and general public in connection
with the enquiry as to the physical character and economic resources of our new northern territories, to which he may fairly
refer in the present instance.
That in 1875 as a result of the distribution of the memorialist's pamphlet " Peace River," in England, an offer was made by
the Reverend Henry M. Fletcher (then of Marlborough, England
—now of Grasmere, Westmoreland, England—a gentleman of
high responsibility) to the Government of Canada, to conduct and
assist with his gratuitous services a colony of about one hundred
and forty English agriculturists, of independent means, to the
Feace River region.    The matter was referred, by the Govern- ment, to the memorialist for information and advice. As the
subject was new and important, the memorialist gave it his best
attention and sent in an extended report advising against any
immediate effort in that direction, but at the same time indicating
what should be done for it in preparation. The report was satisfactory as will appear from the official reference to and acknowledgements of it, in annexed papers H, I and J.
That in 1876, the memorialist was summoned as a witness to
give evidence as to the North West Territories and in fact of our
whole North and West beyond older Canada, before the Select
Committee of the House of Commons on Immigration and Colonization. That the examination was exhaustive, covering the whole
ground of enquiry as to economic resources and means of development, &c. That, amongst other evidence, the memorialist repeated
his tabulation of economic areas, then yet undetermined by official
survey, and not generally known : and since proved to be correct.
That the information was given in such a manner, with such
authority, as to inspire belief and suggest governmental action for
ascertainment of the truth. The report of all this is in blue book,
and was extensively utilized in promoting the scheme of railway
in question.
*
*•   *
That in 1884 the memorialist was also summoned to give
evidence before the Select Committee of the House of Commons
on the subject of Navigability of Hudson's Bay and Straits for
commercial purposes.
That collating and tabulating with considerable research
much useful information on the subject, he gave his evidence
with documentary authorities, and from personal experience, in a
manner to render it of special value to the enquiry.
*
*     *
/ That last Session he was again summoned to give evidence
on the subject of the North West before a Parliamentary Committee, viz., The Honourable Senate Committee to enquire into
the resources of the great McKenzie Basin. That he did so,
freely and largely, is shown by the report of that Committee.
That amongst other evidence on that occasion, the memorialist,
at the request of the Committee through its Chairman, the
Honourable Senator Schultz (now Lieutenant-Governor of Manitoba), gave in (and were accepted) about thirty copies of his book,
Peace River, for distribution amongst the members of the Com- 8
mittee : much of which pamphlet, as to economic resources, is
cited in the official report of that Committee.
*
*     *
That for all these attendances and services as a witness before
the above Committees the memorialist makes no special claim for
remuneration : it was common citizen duty; and for his time,
&c, he was, in some of the instances, taxed and paid in due
course, but irrespective of any special consideration for the service.
-:o:-
SUMMARY OF CASE.
But as to the larger service, first above referred to, with its
incidental outlay, the memorialist does—as already stated—claim
some remuneration and indemnity :
1. Because, in the first instance, he was specifically engaged
for the work in question, primarily and sequentially.
2. Because the work was 'efficiently done, with perfect
acceptance and approbation throughout: as now proved.
3. Because the Government' and the general public who so
accepted, utilized and had the acknowledged benefit of that service are—the memorialist respectfully considers—bound in
equity, if not in strict law, to recompense such service, irrespective of any mere legal technicalities that may be suggested:
certainly as much so as that of any of the many thousands who
for infinitely less sacrifice of personal interests have received due
guerdon from Government and Parliament for North West service. That as to evidence—even legal evidence—on this point
of liability, the memorialist submits these facts, viz :
1. Mr. Fleming was the authorized officer of the Government for the work in question, under Act of Parliament.
2. He, thereon, necessarily, engaged the memorialist for that
work.
3. His certificate of such engagement (apart from the
engagement paper itself, the telegram aforesaid) and of the important and beneficial service thereon rendered, is before the
Government, accompanying the present petition.
That, moreover, to meet the incident of a reference of the
matter by the Privy Council to the Department of Railways, as
reported to the memorialist, he procured a duplicate original of
his said certificate from Mr. Fleming, and along with  a special memorial (explanatory) to the Honourable Minister of Railways,
sent it under address to the Minister of Railways for record in
the Department—where, in due course, it should still be, under
the official noting " No. 22550. Subj. 961. Reg. 35835," (or
about that), to dates " 17 Feb." and " 23 Feb. 1875" as explained
in official acknowledgment paper BB annexed. That the original
papers and books of the Pacific Railway in question were, as is
known, all destroyed by fire ; and that under the circumstances
the said certificate is the best proof possible, and legal, technically.
That some objection has been suggested on the score of delay
in the present claim.
That as to that, the memorialist has to say :
1. That the nature of the service—much of it for a while
undetermined as to truth and value; the fluctuations of the enterprise, and various other causes of delay in arriving at a satisfactory
test of the correctness of the information and advances of the
memorialist on the subject, weighed with him in deferring his
claim.
2. That from time to time, long before he thought of ever
having occasion to prefer any such claim, the memorialist was
kindly honoured by purely spontaneous expressions, in writing,
of thanks and commendation from leading members of the
Government of Canada, accompanied by the gratuitous statement
that the service, in view of its special value to the public, should
be practically recognized : to quote one—" I read, with pleasure,
" your last pamphlet," (that of 1880 " Problem of Canada.") " I
" think, if rewards go to those who have earned them in the
" North West, you should be the first to receive them." That
however, some accidental or technical difficulty seems to have
arisen, in Council, in dealing with it, inter alia, the very exceptional character of the claim, and the doubt, in the mind of some,
as to whether, technically, it is legal, and would be unobjectionable to Parliament and the press as the exponents of public
opinion; and, in consequence, the matter—so far as the memorialist knows—was left in abeyance.
That receiving no answer to his petition, the memorialist
withdrew it at the close of last Session, and all his papers (with
the petition itself, viz., of March 1883), were returned to him.
That he now renews it, in form to meet—as he trusts—the
objections previously raised.
*
*     * 10
That the more special object of the present memorial, with
its accompanying documentary evidence, is to inform Parliament
—with whom the vote sought ultimately rests—of the nature of
the claim.
That the memorialist has every confidence in the sense of
justie.3 of the Government and Parliament in such a case—comparatively of little moment, in public concern, though it may
appear to be.
That the memorialist is not aware of having forfeited any
just consideration in this matter: and the needs of his declining
life force him to thus present his claim; leaving it to his countrymen as represented in Government and Parliament to say what
he should get in the way of indemnity or just recompense.
MALCOLM MACLEOD.
Ottawa, 31st January. 1889. \\
.^ipiPiEisriDrx:.
PAGE
A   Certificate from Sandford Fleming  Ii5
B   Telegram from same  14
BB Certificate in Railway Department  14
©    Certificate from Ex-Lieut. Governor Morris  15
D   Red River Troubles—Note in explanation  15
E   Certificate from Sir James Douglas, Gov, British Columbia.... 10
F           ''         from Surveyor-General of Dominion Lands, Col. J.
S. Dennis  10
0 Letter from same as to Lands  17
H              "           "     as to Colony to Peace River  17
1 "           "                  "                 .    " -  18
J               "        John Lowe, Secretary Dept. Agriculture  18
K.             "        Professor Macoun ,  19
li              "        Ex-Lieut. Governor Masson  19
M              "        Sir Hector Langevin  20
HI   Pamphlet " Problem of Canada "  20
O   Historical Record of Service, Appleton and Bancroft  21  A
Special Certificate  of  Mr.   Sandford  Fleming,  Engineer  in
in Chief, of the Canadian Pacific Railway, as to the services
of Mr. Malcolm MacLeod in starting the work, and information (reliable) as to the extraordinary agricultural and other
economic resources   of   the   North  West  Territories   and
British Columbia:
(Letter written specifically for use with Petition to the Government of Canada for indemnity of outlay, etc.,
in above service.)
"Ottawa, 12th March, 1883.
Malcolm MacLeod, Esq.
" Dear Sie,—In responding to your request I have much pleasure in
stating that I have appreciated very highly your zeal in years gone bye in
bringing under the notice of the public, t.he North West of Canada.
When first charged with the surveys of the Canadian Pacific Railway
it was my duty to seek for information in every quarter where it might be
available.
Having read letters in the public papers written from time to time by
you on the subject, I was led to make your acquaintance, and I obtained
from you information respecting the physical features of the country on
both sides of the Rocky Mountains, which I considered of special value and
perfectly reliable.
When I started in 1872 to make a journey overland, you were good
enough to place in my hands advance sheets of your pamphlet '' Peace
River," which I read on the way across the plains with deep interest.
It was this pamphlet which suggested to me the idea of gaining additional information respecting the Peace River country, and I felt it in the
public interest that an examination of it should be made without delay. I
accordingly detached Professor Macoun and Mr. Horetsky from other duties
and instructed them at Edmonton to proceed to Peace River and thence
across to the Pacific Coast. The results are given at length in my Pacific
Railway Reports, to which I may refer. But for you, I may say, it is just
possible that we might have known very little about the Peace River Region
at the present day—and although the region may not be opened up by
railways for some time it certainly iveighed very heavily in the scales when
the question of the route of the Pacific Railway was under consideration
a few years ago.
Your views with respect to the productiveness of the North West have
been more than confirmed by recent examinations. Few men were to be
found in Canada who wrote so enthusiastically about the country before
and after the Union with British Columbia. I feel that the public is
deeply in your dkbt, and I would be glad to"*see the debt diminished in
some way.
L. am aware that your "writings have been read on both sides of the
Atlantic. I have had occasion to learn from letters received from England
that you have contributed to the advancement of Canada and especially the
North West region, in the Mother Country.
If you should consider any further testimony of mine with respect to
the public services you have rendered, of any value, I shall consider it a
simple act of justice to you to furnish it.
Yours very truly,
SANDFORD   FLEMING. 14
B
(Telegram engaging Mr. McLeod for aid in starting preliminary
survey for The Canadian Pacific Railway.)
" Ottawa, 19th May, 1871.
To M. McLeod, Esq. ,
Barrister, Aylmer.
Mr. Fleming will bo much pleased if you can give him an interview
here. I advised him that you were well acquainted with British Columbia.
Expenses will be paid.        ,
WILLIAM WALLACE."
(Then Secretary for the work—
Subsequently M.P. for S. Norfolk.)
BB
(Official acknowledgement from Department of Railways.)
Seal—Department)
of Railways <tnd > ,. „ ,_, , ..„,.,     Jr.~_
Canals, Canada, j " OTTAWA, February 17th, 188o.
No. 22550.
Subj. 961.    *
Rcf. 35835.
Sir,—I am directed to acknowledge the receipt of a Memorial* from
you, addressed to His Excellency the Governor General and transferred by
the Secretaiy of State to this Department asking for remuneration by a
Land Grant for alleged services rendered the Dominion Government.
I am, sir,
Your Obedient Servant,
A. P. BRADLEY,
Malcolm McLeod, Esq., Secretary."
Barrister,
Ottawa. *Note.
* Note by Petitioner.
In connection with this " Memorial," and to accompany it, the Petitioner, on 23rd February, 1885, addressed to the Honourable Minister of
Railways, a duplicate original certificate of Mr. Sandford Fleming, as to the
service in question—the other (the first original) remaining annexed lo the
Petition of 1883 before the Honourable Privy Council.
The reason why the duplicate original No. 2 did not accompany the
Memorial of six days before was unavoidable delay in getting it. It is the
only evidence in the Department, of the service in question. The original
papers of the Canadian Pacific Railway Office, in which there might have
been—but not necessarily so -mention of the engagement and service in
question were burnt in 1873..
M. McL. 15
C
(Certificate from ex-Lieutenant-Governor A. Morris.)
" Toronto, 23 March, 1883.
Dear Sir,—In reply to your letter I write to say, that I am very well
aware that you devoted a great deal of time and effort, under the nom de
plume of " Britannicus," in the press, to call attention to the value of the
North West possessions, to the Pacific Railway route and other matters
affecting the welfare and progress of Canada. I regarded you, at the time,
when the public mind was largely uninformed on these subjects as rendering very important service to the country, your connection with the North
West enabling you to speak with intelligence and authority.
I am also aware, that at the time of the Red River Troubles* you communicated your views to me as a Minister of the Crown, and that I placed
you in communication with the late Hon. Mr. Howe, then Secretary of
State. I know of no one who laboured more assiduously in dealing with
the questions I have referred to in the earlier part of this letter than you did.
Yours truly,
M. McLeod, Esq., ALEX. MORRIS.
Ottawa.
D
Note.
* "Red River Troubles"
In explanation of this I would state :
When these " Troubles" (in 1869) occurred—and of which, I may state,
I had, by letter of 27th Sept. 1869 to the then Premier of Ontario (J. S.
McDonald)—a personal friend—given warning, or at least, emphatically
foretold what would likely arise from the state of matters in question then
known to me. On 2 Oct. as he wrote me he spoke of it to the Hon. Mr.
McDougall, in Toronto, then on his way to Red River. The warning was
unheeded ; and the difficulty occurred, just as apprehended.
When the fact was reported to the Government in Ottawa, they were,
evidently, taken by surprise, and seemed at a loss how to meet it. In the
meantime a cry was raised, in Ontario especially, to send troops to force
the way.
I knew that that, if possible at the time—which I doubted—any military effort would be disastrous to all concerned, and that the first shot in
such attempt, under the condition of things then there, with the Hudson's
Bay Company's people and even chief officer in charge of Fort Garry
powerless against the party in resistance, would, possibly, be fatal to the
cherished scheme of the annexation of the North West.
Thereupon, as there was no one else, about here, to inform the Government of the chief causes of the difficulty, I offered to do so. I did this, first
by memorial to the Government from me as a North Wester, personally and
intimately connected with many of the chief families in the settlement, and
moreover having, by inheritance, proprietary rights in it. At the same
time avowing our utmost loyalty. In the memorial, however, I deprecated
any forcible measures at the time. The memorial was, I understood, duly
received, and regarded. At the same time I knew that an explanation was
necessary. Mr. Morris had always conspicuously shown an intelligent
interest in North West matters, and, privately—as he says, I addressed
myself to him—offering information which I thought necessary, and which
pi'oved so.  The result was an interview—in fact two or three—in the course 16
of which, with documentary evidence, I explained the esoteric causes of
the passive attitude, if not worse, of the Hudson Bay officials in Fort
Garry, and other causes (natural and reasonable) of discontent at the juncture. It was with Mr. Howe, as then charged with such matters, that I
had the interviews, and I have his letter of thanks for the service. The
Government acted on it.
M. McLeod (Petitioner).
E
(Certificate of Sir James Douglas, Governor of British Columbia.)
Exti act.
" Victoria, 3rd April, 1873.
Dear Mr. McLeod,—I have had the pleasure of receiving your letter
of the 17th December last, together with the McDonald journal and explanatory notes" [iMcLeod's " Peace River,"] " for which I most sincerely thank
you.
To say that I read over these documents with that sort of feeling which
one experiences in running through any ordinary publication, would very
inadequately express the intense gratification derived from their perusal.
It was really going over old familiar ground ; recalling scenes and incidents
possessing for me a most lively interest: The plain, simple, unvarnished
tale of the daily progress and experiences of the adventurous travellers
was, to me, and to many others who read the little work, far more touching
than the most sensational fiction."
******
JQp" Your notes and tables of distances must have been of immense service
to Mr. Fleming in preparing his last annual report, which before I received
your letter, showing how he acquired his information, greatly surprised
me, by its fulness of detail and evident familiarity with the leading physical
features of the country, as well as the breadth and vigour with which it
grappled and dealt with the whole subject of the overland route.
I must certainly add my testimony to that of Mr. Fleming" [N.B.—Mr.
Fleming had seen him in 1872,] "and of many other friends and supporters
of the grand Canadian enterprise, as to the extreme importance of your
literary contributions in promoting the work.
I retain a lively recollection of your worthy father," &c.
Yours very sincerely,
M. McLeod, Esq., JAMES DOUGLAS.
Aylmer, P.Q.
F
(Certificate from the Surveyor-General of Dominion Lands,
Col. J.' S. Dennis.)
" Ottawa, 31 July, 1872.
My Dear Mr. McLeod,—The first glance into your book since writing
you this morning possesses peculiar interest to me from the fact that your
estimate of the available land for farming purposes in the N. W. so nearly
agrees with my own. The latter you will see in the blue book now sent
you. 'I have been accused of making a statement then which facts will not
warrant as to the extent of the area in question. 17
I shall be glad if after perusing my estimate and classification you can
write me a note on the subject which I can use in case the matter is-
brought up again.
Believe me,
My dear sir,
truly yours,
To Malcolm McLeod, Esq., J. S. DENNIS.
Aylmer.
a
(Another Letter from Colonel Dennis.)
" Ottawa, Dec. 4, 1872.
My Dear Mr. McLeod,—Many thanks for your kindly sending me a
presentation copy of your very interesting and timely "Brochure " on Peace
River.
I shall always prize it, not alone as a narrative of facts connected with
events which occurred in the Territory many years before even the most
sanguine could have imagined that country likely to be opened up for
settlement;—but also because of the author's claims to be considered as one
of the pioneers of the North West, and as one knowing of what he writes.
I have made a distribution among gentlemen who will appreciate them
of the three copies you had previously sent me through Durie & Son.
Believe me,
My dear sir,
Yours very sincerely,
J. S. DENNIS.
Extract from other letter from same.
"You will see that the pamphlet written by you on the Territory in
question is attracting attention in England." J. S. D.
Note.
Several copies were gratuitously distributed in England, as well as
many more in Canada, by the author, amongst leading minds in such
matter, and also amongst the leading press.
There was no sale of the work in England, nor was any attempted.
The author distributed at his own cost, at least eight-tenths of the whole
issue of 500. M. McL.
(Letter from the Surveyor General of Dominion Lands respecting
Colony to Peace River.)
" Dominion Lands Office,
"Ref. 4649." Ottawa, 14th Dec, 1875.
"4282"
Dear Sir,—I enclose for your perusal a letter from the Rev. Mr.
Fletcher, Marlborough, England, on the subject of a Colony which he proposes to form in the Peace River district, and will be much obliged for any
remarks with which you may favour me as to the expediency or otherwise 18
of encouraging such a scheme on the part of the Government. It appears
to me doubtful whether it is one which under existing circumstances, it
would be proper for the Government to extend much encouragement to.
I do not see what is to support the colony at the present time—there
would be no outlet for any surplus produce, and with exception of mining,
I see no industry by which they could make a subsistence.
Tell me frankly what you think of it, and in writing me please to return the paper.
I received this morning your pamphlet on the subject of the Pacific
Railway scheme, for which, many thanks,
Believe me,
Dear Sir,
Yours very truly,
J. S. DENNIS."
" You will see that the pamphlet written by you on the territory in
question is attracting attention in England.
Perhaps you will be good enough to communicate directly with Mr.
Fletcher, as he expresses a desire to be put in communication with you."
" J. S. D."
(Other letter from same in same matter—Acknowledgement.)
" Dominion Lands Office,
"Ref. 4649." Ottawa, 17th Dec, 1875.
"4311" '  '
Malcolm McLeod, Esq.,
Barrister, &c, &c.,*
Aylmer, P.Q.
My dear Mr. McLeod,—I am much obliged for your letter in reply to
mine on the subject of the colony proposed to be found in the Peace River
territory by the Rev. Mr. Fletcher.
I entirely agree in your view that to attempt to form such a settlement'
at the present time under existing circumstances would be premature, and
would lead to great disappointment and losses on the part of its promoter.
You will see by the note enclosed that Mr. Lowe, the Secretary of the
Department of Agriculture and Immigration, has sent a copy of your letter
to Mr. Fletcher in England.
Believe me, my dear sir,
Very sincerely yours,
J. S. DENNIS."
J
(Letter of Mr. Lowe in same matter.)
" Department of Agriculture,
Ottawa, 16 Dec, 1875.
Dear Col. Dennis,—I am obliged to you for your note of this day's
date with a letter from Mr. McLeod, a copy of which has been enclosed to
the Rev. Mr. Fletcher, in England, for his information, and he has also
been informed that you concur in Mr. McLeod's opinions.
Believe me,
Col. Dennis, Yours truly,
&c, &c JOHN LOWE. 19
K
(Extract from Letter of Professor Macoun, Botanist, after examinations of the Peace River Region—1872-5.)
" My Dear Sir,—Your writings first called attention to the country,
and after having traversed the country from end to end, I can say with
safety, that all your statements regarding the fertility of the country are
fully borne out by the facts which came under my own notice. You have
certainly not overstated the value," &c
" I remain,
To Malcolm McLeod, Esq., Yours sincerely,
Aylmer. .JOHN MACOUN."
In this connection, the memorialist would also refer to Professor
Macoun's evidence, at great length, as to the flora of the Peace River Region
and the North West beyond the so-called " Fertile Belt" of the Saskatchewan, before The Commons' Special Committee on Immigration and Colonization in 1876, reported in blue book, along with that of the memorialist:
and in which latter is embraced a tabulated statement, by myself, of
agricultural and economic areas throughout the whole North West, and
which was accepted as the basis of best information on the subject—subsequently confirmed, so far as examined, by official experts and reports.
Also, in same connection, the memorialist would refer to testimony of
the same witness as reported in page 68 of the Report (1888) of the Select
Committee of the Senate appointed to enquire into the resources of the
Great McKenzie Basin, in which he says :—
" In 1872, I was sent by Mr. Fleming, who was then exploring the
Canadian Pacific Railway, from Edmonton, and we had the book with us
that Judge McLeod spoke of having written" [meaning "Peace River"I.
"It was his book that caused Mr. Fleming to send me and another gentleman to explore the Peace River and see if there was a Pass there. We
made our way from Edmonton to the Peace River, and reached the river
about the last of September."
Note.—They found the Pass just as represented, and with height,
above sea as measured by them with aneroid, actually less by about fifty
feet than the estimate given by me in my book: in fact my estimate and the line for railway as subsequently laid on survey, through the
Pass agree to a foot, viz., 1750 feet above the sea, as appears by plan to
Report of 1874 by Mr, Fleming. And so was it as to all estimates of distances, heights, areas, &c, in the matters in question given by me
in the writings in question : a fact attested by Mr. Fleming, and by all
subsequent survey and expert examination, proving the reliability of the
information given. Professor Selwyn's report establishes the same fact as
to Peace River.
M. McL.
(Extract of Letter from ex-Lieut. Gov. Masson when Minister of
the Crown, Sept. 1879.)
"I fully acknowledge the great services you have rendered in many
ways to the country, and especially in contributing to make known to
Canada the great resources of our North-West acquisition, and that I
would feel happy if something could be done for you in recognition of those
services." 20
Also, from same in April, 1877 : " You must be very much gratified
to see that the facts you have so strenuously tried to bring before our
Canadian public have at last received their proof."
M. McLeod, Esq., Yours truly,
Aylmer, Q. L. R. MASSON.
M
(Letter from Sir Hector Langevin.)
" Ottawa, 15th July, 1880.
My Dear Mr. McLeod,—I have to thank you for your attention in
sending me a copy of your work entitled " The Problem of Canada." Your
work is a timely one. Everybody thinks and speaks just now about our
Great Pacific Railway and our great North West Territories. Your 76 pages
will help in calling attention to these subjects out of Canada.
You have done well to publish them.
Yours truly,
Malcolm McLeod, Esq., HECTOR L. LANGEVIN.
Aylmer.
" The Problem of  Canada."
This was a pamphlet, entirely of my own suggestion, to meet what I
considered a pressing want at the juncture, as there was no book (apart
from scarcely accessible blue books) out on the subject, giving any idea of
the work save the writer's pamphlets. The scheme of a Canadian Pacific
Railway, on merely Canadian resources, appeared—so far as the public
knew—to be, at the time, impracticable. The writer in advocating it ab
initio, eleven years before (1869) had pointedly urged the necessity (and
duty) of Imperial contribution in the measure of obvious Imperial interest
in the work. In the course of his argument he (amongst other facts ad
rem) gave statistics, carefully collated by himself, as to the extent and
progress of the Pacific trade to be touched, served, and enhanced by it to
the benefit of Britain as well as Canada. He also advocated, as he had from
the outset, that the work should be made and permanently owned and
governed by the Canadian Government, or, in alternative, by the Imperial
Government.
Incidentally, the immense natural resources of the North West Territories and British Columbia, for local support to such a work, were pointed
out. Also the feasibility and comparative facility and advantages of the
Canadian route. All this was put in form and manner to readily seize the
mind—even of the British capitalist to whom recourse seemed inevitable
for means.
The writer gratuitously distributed about three hundred copies of the
work to leading minds and leading,,press in England, Canada and Australia,
with very general acceptance, as shown by press acknowledgements, and
by special complimentary autograph acknowledgements from even the
Marquis of Salisbury, Mr. Gladstone, and other leading statesmen in England as well as in Canada.
The little work did really good service in the furtherance of the project
although in some respects it clashed with the present scheme, which, at the
time, was unknown to the writer, and—lie may add—unknown to the
general public.    In effect, it served the present scheme ; and this, from Sir 21
Hector's approval, seems to have been his view of it. The writer acted in
the matter on his own responsibility, irrespective of any parties personally
interested in the work. It may, by some, be regarded as obtrusive. Be
that as it may, the writer makes no demand for it, but only for what was
called for and utilized before that, by the Government in the public interest,
as stated in Mr. Fleming's certificate, on application by him as an officer,
ad hoe, of the Government.
M. McL.
O
Historical Evidence of Service.
Extracts.
(From Appleton's Cvclopcedia of American Biography, Vol. 4
pp. 146-7.)
'' McLeod, John, Canadian explorer and trader."      * * *
" He effected, with his associates, an expansion of trade in furs and
•other natural resources of the Pacific Slope from Yukon to San Francisco,
and with the Sandwich Islands and Alaska." * * * *
" He did more than any other man to open the North West for settlement ."
" His son, Malcolm, was really the first to point out the possibility of
& trans-continental railway, and in 1869 defined a feasible route from Montreal to the Pacific, giving estimates of distances and heights. When, under
the terms of Union with British Columbia, an exploration was set on foot
by the Canadian Government, Sandford Fleming, the Chief Engineer, put
himself in communication with Mr. McLeod, who rendered valuable assistance in connection with the preliminary survey for the Canadian Pacific
Railway." * * * " He has published ' The Peace River' from his
father's journal and his own observations while living in the Rocky Mountains (Ottawa 1872)—five pamphlets on the Pacific Railway under the pen-
name ' Britannicus' (1874-80), and ' Problem of Canada' (1880)."
See also Bancroft's History of British Columbia, under the above names,
father and son, cited by Appleton, where the former is referred to as
the " Veteran" among the fur traders and pioneers of " the North West."
The story of his service in this regard has never been published, but the
facts, in their importance, have, independently, by the research of foreign
historians, found some recognition and. record : his son—sharer in early life
of his toils and perils—has but continued that service, without any claim
to any special merit therefor, and without reward or compensation in any
way hitherto.
M. McL. PETITION
To His Excellency The Right Honourable LORD STANLEY,
of Preston, &c, &c, GOVERNOR GENERAL of the
Dominion.of Canada, &o., &o.
The Petition of the undersigned, Malcolm MacLeod, of the
City of Ottawa, Canada, Advocate, &c., die.
RESPECTFULLY REPRESENTS —
That your Petitioner, under circumstances stated in the
annexed memorial, at the instance of the Government of Canada
through its proper officer, rendered special services in the initiation and early prosecution of the scheme of a transcontinental
railway':
That these services, or at least some of them, are specially
acknowledged in the official report of Mr. Sandford Fleming of
survey for the work, in 1874, page 13 ; and also subsequently in
other official reports on the subject.
That having been born in the far North West Territories,
accompanying, there and in British Columbia, his father the late
John MacLeod, Senior, one of the original trade partners of
the Hudson's Bay Company, a pioneer (now historical) of British
conquest and colonization between Hudson's Bay and the Pacific,
your Petitioner had an exceptional personal knowledge of the
whole regions to be traversed by such a work. That as' to the
most difficult part of it for railway, especially between the eastern
slope of the Rocky Mountains and the Pacific, there was, at the
time, no official or authentic report except what (such as the official report of Captain Palliser in I860, in Imperial Service) was
positively adverse.
That your Petitioner, with a better knowledge of the region
in question—familiar with it—had, from time to time, before Mr.
Fleming's survey, been writing in the leading press in Canada on
the subject, defining, with much detail, from his own knowledge
and from the journals and reports, &c, of his father and associates in the Hudson's Bay Company throughout the country, 23
different feasible routes for travel and even railway, from the
settled parts of Canada to the Pacific.
That these were the only writings, in press, (as admitted by
the highest authorities) with any claim to authenticity or reliability
on the subject at the time and previous to the survey by Mr.
Fleming, referred to in the annexed memorial. That the proof
(or at least some of it) on this head is indicated in the memorial,
with certificates from proper authorities.
That to start the initiatory survey for the work, Mr. Fleming
(as he states in his annexed certificate) applied to your Petitioner
for necessary information, not procurable elsewhere.
That your Petitioner, then living at a distance, personally
responded at once to the call ; with, however, much sacrifice of
pressing professional duties at the Bar in the Province of Quebec,
where Petitioner was then living and practising. That for
further particulars on this head, Petitioner refers to the annexed
memorial.
That immediately after starting the survey, your Petitioner,
at the instance of Mr. Fleming (but at Petitioner's sole cost) for
furtherance of the scheme, published his oook " Peace River,"
giving a mass of new and valuable information as to the feasibility of railway routes, and extent and nature of agricultural and
other economic resources in the far North West, beyond the so-
called " Fertile Belt," resources hitherto unknown and beyond all
preconception on the subject.
That that information—Petitioner is in a position to state,
and, if need be, prove—largely, if not mainly, ab initio, enlisted
capitalists in England and Europe, as well as in Canada, in the
enterprise.
That before, and from the initiation of the scheme until the
Official Report of Survey in 1874 by the Engineer in Chief (Mr.
Fleming) there was no one—so far as he knows—in the position
of your Petitioner to speak or write with any degree of authority
on the subject; and by the first practical promoters and contractors of the work he was appealed to accordingly by letter and
otherwise, '•.    .'
That up to 18S0 when the work was committed to the present company, your Petitioner was—-so far as he knows—the only
public writer (in press and pamphlet) on the subject with any
authoritative knowledge of the facts to be dealt with in the work.
That everything, in utmost detail, which he advanced on the
theme has since proved true and correct.
That the effort cost him, in outlay, less of time, and labor, at
least five thousand dollars. 24
That for all this work and outlay your Petitioner has not,
directly nor indirectly, received the slightest remuneration in
any way.
That the service has seriously impoverished him ; and in his
old age his necessities force him to now present his claim for
some indemnity at least, and for such remuneration as Your
Excellency, in Government, may deem just and proper.
And your Petitioner, as in duty bound, will ever pray.
MALCOLM MACLEOD
Ottawa, 31st January, 1889.  

Cite

Citation Scheme:

        

Citations by CSL (citeproc-js)

Usage Statistics

Share

Embed

Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML of your page to embed this item in your website.
                        
                            <div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
                            <script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
                            src="{[{embed.src}]}"
                            data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
                            data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
                            data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
                            data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
                            async >
                            </script>
                            </div>
                        
                    
IIIF logo Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard. To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/cdm.bcbooks.1-0222282/manifest

Comment

Related Items