N u m b e r o f C l o s e d S t r i n g s E m i t t e d f r o m a D e c a y i n g D - b r a n e by Steven Lyle Conboy B . S c , Queen's University, 2005 A THESIS S U B M I T T E D IN P A R T I A L F U L F I L M E N T O F T H E R E Q U I R E M E N T S F O R T H E D E G R E E O F Master of Science The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Physics) The University Of British Columbia August, 2007 © Steven Lyle Conboy 2007 A b s t r a c t We have calculated in the covariant gauge the total number of massless closed strings emitted from a decaying Dp-brane using fermionization tech-nology on the time component of the boundary state. This verifies the computation carried out in the less well known temporal gauge despite dif-ferences in renormalization schemes. In addition we have attempted to use the fermionic technique to calculate the total number of closed strings emitted. Our result is difficult to interpret due to the ambiguity involved with rotating it back to Minkowski space. ii T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s A b s t r a c t i i Tab le of Conten ts i i i L i s t of Tables " v L i s t of F igures v i Acknowledgemen t s vi i D e d i c a t i o n vi i i 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n 1 1.1 The Basics 1 .1.2 Tachyon Action 2 1.3 Boundary State Formalism 3 1.3.1 Renormalization scheme comparison 6 1.4 The boundary as a source of closed strings 7 2 F e r m i o n i z a t i o n of X° 10 2.1 Compactification at the self-dual radius 13 2.2 The boundary state in fermion variables 13 3 C a l c u l a t i o n of h{x°) 16 3.1 NS sector ' 17 3.1.1 (nLnR\BD)NS 17 3.1.2 Calculation of (7i_ -KR|ai&i | B D ) N S 19 3.2 Ramond Sector 19 3.3 Summary and Final Calculation 20 4 N u m b e r of Massless St r ings E m i t t e d 23 4.1 1-point functions i . . 23 4.2 Number of Massless Strings Emitted by Half Brane 26 ii i Table of Contents 5 T o t a l N u m b e r of Par t ic les E m i t t e d 28 6 S u m m a r y and C o n c l u s i o n 32 B i b l i o g r a p h y 33 Appendices A C a l c u l a t i o n of (-KL vr R \a i&i \BD) 34 A . l (irL TTR\a1a1\BD)NS 34 A . l . l 7 r L > 0 , 7 r f l > 0 35 A.1.2 7 r_>0 ,7 r f i <0 36 A.1.3 7 r L < 0 , 7 r R > 0 37 A . 1.4 7 r_<0 ,7 r f t <0 38 A.1.5 7i-_=0,7rR = 0 39 A.2 {irLnR\a1a1\BD)R : 39 A.2.1 7T_ > 0, TTR > 0 40 A.2.2 7T_ > 0,7r f l < 0 41 A.2.3 TT l < O , ^ > 0 42 A.2.4 7 r _ < 0 , 7 r f i < 0 43 B B R S T invar iance of the M2 = 0 state 44 C P o l a r i z a t i o n sums 46 iv L i s t o f T a b l e s 4.1 Number of particles emitted with M 2 = 0 for half S-brane. L i s t o f F i g u r e s 1.1 Gluing process used to convert an open string world-sheet into a closed string world-sheet 4 vi A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t s First and foremost like to thank my supervisor Dr. Semenoff. This thesis would not exist without his help and guidance. I would also like to thank Dr. Karczmarek for taking the time to read and edit my thesis. M y thanks are also extended to my colleagues Lionel Brits, James Charbonneau and Benjamin Gutierrez for useful discussions as well as help with M _ X . I "acknowledge N S E R C for supporting my work the past two years. vii D e d i c a t i o n I would like to dedicate my thesis to my fiancee Carmen Romero as well as to thank her for her love and support over the past two years. vi i i C h a p t e r 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n Perturbed slightly from the maximum of its potential an open string tachyon will undertake a rolling process towards the minimum of the potential, the closed string vacuum [5]. It has been shown [2, 7] that as the brane decays it radiates closed strings. The main goal of this thesis was to find the total number of strings emitted by the Dp-brane. This calculation has been previously carried out level by level in [2] in the temporal gauge. We have been motivated to attempt this same calculation in the familiar covariant gauge because there is some doubt that the use of the temporal gauge in [2] is properly justified. We find that our result for the total number of massless strings emitted agrees with [2]. This is despite the fact that the coupling constants g and g, defined below, are given by a different renormalization procedure in the fermionic approach than in the bosonic approach. For the special case of the half S-brane we find the result to be coupling independent, allowing us to find explicit values for the number of particles emitted. Our attempts at calculating the total number of closed strings emitted by an unstable Dp-brane in the covariant gauge have been unsuccessful. This is due to the fact that fermionization of the time component of the boundary state requires an analytic continuation to periodic Euclidean time. Thus any physical result requires the reinstatement of non-compact Euclidean time followed by a Wick rotation back to Minkowski time. As we will explain in chapter 5 there appears no clear way of rotating back to Minkowski space, preventing us from obtaining a meaningful result. 1.1 The Basics The conformal field theory discussed in this paper has applications in many fields of physics [1], but we will be discussing it in the context of bosonic string theory. We will be dealing with three objects in bosonic string theory; the closed string, the open string and the D-brane. Oscillations of the strings are interpreted as bosons, for example the first excited state of the open and > closed strings are interpreted as spin 1 and spin 2 objects, respectively. 1 Chapter 1. Introduction A string is embedded in space-time via the parameterizations Xtl((r, T) where T is analogous to proper time in the case of the point particle. The string is an extended object which is why we require a second parameter a. The standard convention is to set the length of string to 2ir for the closed string and TT for the open string. The closed string obeys the condition X^(a + 27T,T) = X)i{a,T). The endpoints of the open string are forced to lie on an object known as a D-brane [4]. The D-brane is sometimes called a Dp-brane in the literature to signify that it extends in p spatial dimensions. As a string moves through space-time it traces out an object known as the world-sheet. Physics is parameterization invariant so we are free to use any parameterization of the world-sheet we wish. Two very useful parameterizations of the world-sheet are: the cylinder w = a + IT iii = a — ir (1-1) and the disk z = ±eiw z = ±e~iw (1.2) where + is used in the case of the closed string and — is used in the case of the open string. These parameterizations are used frequently throughout this thesis. 1.2 Tachyon Action The tachyon action is described by the usual non-decaying world-sheet action plus an exactly marginal boundary operator, Air i poo pn poo — dr dadX°-dX°:- drSbdy+... (1.3) 4?r J-OO JO J-OO given by Suv = ( f c « ° + f e " ^ ° + AdTX°) [_ q . (1.4) It is also possible to include a boundary interaction at the a = TT boundary with different couplings. When we do include an interaction at this boundary we take the couplings to be the same as on the <r = 0 boundary. We note that we have performed a wick rotation in (1.3), so that X° is time in Euclidean space, and the three dots indicate the usual action for the spatial directions and ghosts. Also in (1.3) we have set a' = 1 and we will keep this convention throughout the rest of the thesis. We are assuming that the 2 Chapter 1. Introduction tachyon condensate is space independent, resulting in the usual equation of motion (d2T-d2a)X»(a,T)=0 ' (1.5) as well as a boundary condition given by ( • ^ f - ' h L - ' < l 6 ) at the end of the string. Equation (1.3) defines a conformal field theory for all complex values of g and g, however, since the Minkowski space tachyon field is real g and g must also be real. We are interested in two tachyon profiles, the half S-brane for which g = 0 and as the full S-brane first discussed by Sen in [6] for which g = g. The former corresponds to a tachyon decaying to a stable configuration and the latter to a tachyon coming up from the bottom of its potential and then falling back into it. The topological term associated with A in (1.3) does not affect the equations of motion or the boundary condition. For a non-compact bo-son it can be interpreted as a Bloch wave-number. Further discussion on this can be found in [1]. In this discussion the authors conclude that any value of A £ (0,1) allows us to treat X° as if it had the compactification X° —> X° + 2n. We will show that we need to treat X° as if it were com-pactified in order to use the fermionization technology developed in chapter 2. Since X° is not actually compactified we will wish at some point in our calculation to decompactify X° by integrating out the A dependence over all allowed values of A G (0,1). It is important to note that when we include an interaction at the a = IT end of the strip and wish to decompactify we must integrate over A = Aa=7r — Aa=o, is the difference between the parameters at each boundary. 1.3 Boundary State Formalism The boundary state technique is useful for calculating open string partition' functions Z\B] = Tre-P", (1.7) where H is the Hamiltonian obtained from (1.3). We can rewrite this par-tition function as a closed string correlation function by gluing together the ends of the open string world-sheet. This gluing procedure is illustrated in F ig 1.1. The incoming part of the world-sheet at r = 0 is connected to the outgoing part of the world-sheet at T = ir creating a cylinder and making 3 Chapter 1. Introduction T periodic. As a result the definitions of T and a can be interchanged ex-pressing the correlator as a time evolution operator sandwiched between the boundary states, which encode information about the boundary conditions Z[(3] = (B1\e—"\B2). (1.8) The action (1.3) is now that of a free boson living on a Euclidean cylinder •I roo />Z7T 5' = — / dr da ((dTX0)2 + (drX0)2) + ... ' (1.9) 41" JO The operator H is the Hamiltonian of this action. The Euclidean time parameter is a = because we have used conformal invariance to rescale the closed string world-sheet to match the convention 0 < a < 2TT. Out In A \1 Out In Figure 1.1: Gluing process used to convert an open string world-sheet into a closed string world-sheet We can use the boundary state formalism to represent the interaction of closed strings with a decaying D-brane. The boundary state is a closed string state which is annihilated by the boundary condition that would be imposed on an open string embedding function. As described above this means interchanging the coordinates a <-> r and re-scaling the closed string world-sheet to match the usual convention 0 < a < 2ir. After this process the boundary condition (1.6) becomes the boundary state condition: _L_ "2TT dTX° + i ^ x ° -i°e-*x° \B)xo = 0. (1.10) r=0 4 Chapter 1. Introduction The spatial component \B)g and the ghost component \B)bc of the boundary state are given in [8]. The full boundary state of the tachyon is given by: \B) = Mp \B)Xo <g> \B)x <g> \B)bc (1.11) where the normalization constant A/-p = 7Tir(27r) 6- p (1.12) and the states \B)x = J ( _ ^ e x P ( E E " ( - D ^ ^ - n J 1*11 =0.*x> (1-13) \B)bc = exp ^ - ^2(b-nc-n + b-nC-S^j (c 0 + co)ciCi |0) (1-14) are the same as for the non-decaying Dp-brane. A few comments on no-tation: if the direction of Xs is along the Dp-brane, it has a Neumann boundary condition with ds = 1 and momentum denoted by fcy. Similarly a direction transverse to the Dp-brane has a Dirichlet boundary condition with ds = 0 and momentum denoted by A_. The |fc|| = 0, A_) is the eigen-state of these momenta. The state |0) given in (1.14) is the SL(2,C) invariant ground state. In addition we remind the reader of the boson's commutation relations and the ghost's anticommutation relations The boundary state in the time direction is \B)xo = i j ^ - (f(k°) + MfcW0-! + -) 1 0 , 0 ; k°) = i I ^ I c dX°elk°X° ( / ( X ° } + / l ( a ; 0 ) a - 1 " 0 - 1 + -) |0' °; fc0)' ( L 1 7 ) where x° is the position zero mode of X° and ... indicates higher order oscillations. The contour C is the real axis. Other authors, [2] for example, define the above boundary state without an integration over x° and instead add a prescription to later integrate over an arbitrary contour. This gives rise to choices such as Hartle-Hawking contour discussed in [2]. 5 Chapter1. Introduction In [1] \B)xo is expressed in a basis of a;0. We can also do this by inte-grating over k° in the second line of (1.17) to get \B)xo = ijdx° (f(x°)\x°) + h ^ a ^ a ^ x 0 ) + ...) (1.18) where the ... indicates higher order oscillator numbers and \x°) is the posi-tion eigenstate. Using the method of fermionization, the function f(x°) was found in [1] to be: /(*")= 1 X 1 i*o + iM - - M o - 1 (1-19) 1 + ngetx 1 + irge l x 1.3.1 Renormalization scheme comparison Dependence on g and g of f{x°) and h(x°) differ from those found in most other papers because of differences in renormalization prescriptions. The usual expression for f(x°) is given in [2] = i ^ • ) ,s ixo + I . * / ^ /\ - C T o - 1 (1-20) 1 + sm(iTg')etx 1 + sm(7rg')e for the case of the full-brane(^ — g, g' = g') and / ( * 0 ) " T T i k w ( L 2 1 ) for the half-brane (g = 0, g' = 0). In [2] g' and g' are the renormalized versions of the couplings in (1.3). In [1] the relation between g' and g' was found to be given by: s i n 2 7 r \ / ^ = 7 r 2 ^ , i- = 9- (1.22) 9 9 with the special case that g' = g when g = 0. Comparing (1.19) and (1.21) we find the fermionic approach agrees with the bosonic approach at least for the full S-brane and half S-brane. In this thesis we extend the work done in [1] by calculating h(x°) h(x°) = f(x°)-2(l-7r2gg). (1.23) We can compare this to the values obtained in [2]: h(x°) = f{x°) - (1 + cos(27rff')) (1-24) 6 Chapter 1. Introduction for the full S-brane and h(x°) = f(x°) - 2 (1.25) for the half S-brane. 1 Again these results agree at least for the cases of the full S-brane and half S-brane. 1.4 The boundary as a source of closed strings In Q F T the average number N of particles emitted from a classical source j(x) is given by J (2n)D-'2E 2 (1.26) where j(k) is the fourier transform of j(x) and E2 = k2 + m2. Since we are interested in calculating the total number of massless strings emitted we should take our source to be the one point function for creation of massless strings from the D-brane j(k) = WB\c£\B). (1.27) Here CQ = 0 9 ^ A N < ^ ^B) is the B R S T invariant state at the massless level which we have derived in the appendix. As a result the total number of massless particles emitted should be given by ^ = 0 = / J^2E\^BK\B)\\ (1.28) As was discussed in [2] the analogous form of equation (1.26) for the total number of closed strings emitted from the D-brane can be obtained from the optical theorem. On the Lorentzian cylinder it takes the form N = Im((B\ . \B)) (1.29) where b£ = b0^h°, CQ = c°lf, Lo and Lo are the left and right moving V i -rasoro zero modes respectively. The infinitesimal e is used for regularization purposes. We can prove the validity of our expression for the total number of massless particles emitted (1.28) by deriving it from (1.29). We begin by inserting a complete set of closed string states l * c ) ( * d = 1 (1-30) ' W e have used the fact that cP_\oP_\ i—> — a°_ia°_i under the W i c k rotat ion X° >—* iX°. 7 Chapter 1. Introduction after the c 0 in equation (1.29). This conveniently splits (1.29) into a sum over mass levels N = NM2=_4 + NM2=0 + ... = Im ( ( B | 6 + c 0 - | * ) ( * | M 2 = _ 4 ( L 0 + U)-l\B)) +/m((B|b+Co|*)(vI/|M 2_0(L0 + Lo)- 1 |B)) + . . . . (1.31) If we are interested in calculating the number of particles with M 2 = n we need to know the explicit sum over states given by \*ff) (^\M2=n. In the covariant gauge, the most general from \fy) (ty\Mi=0 can take while ensuring a ghost number of 0 is f d26k |*)(*| M a _ 0 = y ^ 2 6 e ^ | 0 , 0 ; f c ) x f f ( 0 , 0 ; f e | . (1.32) The ghost contribution xg is given by % = -i (i TTXii i -1 UXTT j +1 m m i -1 m e n D • (1-33) The states | J.J.),| |J.),| J.f) and | J.J.) are the four degenerate ground states of the ghost system. The state | J.J.) is defined to be annihilated by the ghosts bo and bo. The ghosts co and co can be used to construct the other ground states | fl) = co| J.J.) , | i t ) = co| | | ) and | t t ) = CQCQ\ ID-The properties of Grassman variables and hermiticity demand that the non-vanishing inner product is defined by (J.J. \C~OCQ\ J.J.) = i. Also worth noting is that the SL(2, C) ground state given in equation (1.14) is related to | [[) by the conformal transformation' from the disk to the cylinder, so that as |0> ->b_i6_i | U>- (1-34) After inserting (1.32) into the expression for NM2=0 and after some ma-nipulation we obtain NMi=o = ^ ( / ( 0 8 ^ K * B | c b | f l > | 2 ) = - / 7 | | a ^ 0 2 - ^ ) l ( ^ | c 0 - | B ) | 2 ' = / £ w ^ ^ o \ B ) f (1.35) 8 Chapter 1. Introduction where \^B) is the on-shell B R S T invariant state for a string with M 2 — 0 level, the form of which is derived in the appendix. This calculation has put the particles on-shell so that E2 = k2. We notice that the last line of (1.35) now justifies our conjecture (1.27) because it agrees with (1.28). At first glance the calculation of the total number of closed strings emit-ted seems fairly straightforward. It was given in (1.29) as N = Im((B\ 6 ° - C ° . \B)). (1.36) \ L 0 + L 0 - ie / We remind the reader that - j — ! — = in5(x) + y (1.37) where y is the principal value. Since y is real, this allows us to express (1.29) as N = Im (in (B\6(L0 + L 0 - ie) \B)j . (1.38) We can now rewrite the total number of particles emitted as a product of partition functions by expanding the delta function in (1.38), giving N = Im(iixj d\{B\{b+c^)qLo+~L°-ii'\B)Sj (1.39) where q = elX. The spatial and ghost partition functions are well known [4]. At first glance fermionization seems promising for calculating the time partition function because it allows us to find an explicit expression for \B)X° and Lo + Lo after rotating to Euclidean space. There is, however, one drawback to this approach, finding a consistent way to rotate our final result back to Minkowski space. We will discuss this difficulty after we thoroughly develop the fermionic technology. We note that this problem is absent in the temporal gauge because no analytic continuation is required. 9 C h a p t e r 2 F e r m i o n i z a t i o n o f X ° Here we will briefly summarize the process of fermionization and extend the work done in [1] and [3]. The goal is to express the boundary state in terms of fermion variables. For simplicity we label X° = X and ignore the spatial and ghost parts of the action. It was shown in [3] that fermionizing X° directly leads to the identification X —> X + V2TT, which is inconsistent with the self-dual compactification scheme discussed in the introduction. A way to sidestep this is to first add an extra degree of freedom obeying a Dirichlet boundary condition. Introducing this new boson Y , the Euclidean action becomes: -i roo rift S=— dr da ({dTX)2 + (dAX)2 + (8TY)2 + (daY)2) + ... (2.1) J —oo J0 The boundary state condition now becomes the set of equations (_J_ 8tX + l9-eiX - ile~iX) V 2TT 2 2 / \BD) = 0 (2.2) Y\TT=O\BD} = 0 (2.3) for Y which is thus uncoupled and hence exactly solvable. When calcu-lating quantities such as physical amplitudes we can simply factor out the contribution of the Y boson. We construct the fields ^ = - ^ ( X + r ) , <h = ^=(X-Y) (2.4) which are used to define the mapping to the fermions Mz) = CIL : e - V ^ M : , i>\L(z) =: e^1^ : (\L (2.5) ^2L(z) = < 2 _ : e V ^ 2 i W : , ^(1) = : e " ^ W : C\L (2.6) 4>IR{Z) •= Gfl : e ^ 1 R ( z - ) : , 4R& = : : C\R' (2.7) 1>2R(z) = C2R : e-^*(*"> : , 4R(z) =: e ^ * ( * ) : (2.8) 10 Chapter 2. Fermionization of X1 z and z are the complex co-ordinates corresponding to the conformal trans-formations z = e T + I < 7 , z = eT~w and the CaL/R are co-cycles used to make the fermions anti-commute with each other. The co-cycles are constructed from the zero modes of the bosons V2<l>a = PaL + faR - ™aL In z - inaR In z + ... (2.9) and are given in reference [3] as ClL = ClR = exp (-1^ (7T1L + 7T1R + 27T2L + 27r2fl)) C.2L = C.2R = exp (-i^ (n2L + ^R)^ . (2.10) We now see the advantage of introducing the fields <f>i and ^ and of making the mappings (2.5)-(2.8): it compactifies X and Y at the self-dual .radius making them compatible with the compactification method discussed in the introduction. The fermion bilinear operators obtained from operator product expan-sions of (2.5)-(2.8) are given by 1>\L(*)Mz) := iV2dT4>1L(z) (2.11) V4»V<2L(2) := -iV2dT4>2L(z) (2.12) 4>\r(Z)1>IR{Z) := -iy/2dr<f>1R(z) (2.13) 4R(^2R(Z) : = iV28Tcj>2R{z). (2.14) The fermion action on the cylinder is poo p2n . . S=— J drj^ da(^lL(dT + ida)ijaL + ^aR(dT-ida)iPaRJ. (2.15) When quantized the fermions have mode expansions: i>La{z) = ^i>a,nZ~n , ^Ra(z) = X I 4'a,nZ~n . n n n n where n runs over Z represents wayefunctions which are periodic on cylin-der and Z + 1/2 represents wavefunctions which are antiperiodic. These correspond to Ramond(R) and Neveu-Schwarz (NS) sectors of the theory 11 Chapter 2. Fermionization of X1 respectively. Quantization also gives the non-vanishing anticommutation relations: {^a.m.V'b-n} = <U<W , {V'a.m, i>\ _ „ } = Sab6mn (2.17) Integrating equations (2.11)-(2.14) gives: r-2-n i TTIL = j — : 1>\L(zWlL(z) : (2.18) — : 4L(^L(Z) : (2.19) ^H = - J ^ : 4 R ^ ) M Z ) : (2.20) *2R = ^ ^ : V L W ^ M = (2-21) so that in the NS sector we have oo VaL = ( - l ) " " 1 £ (^,-„tfa,» " V>a,-n<„) (2-22) OO VTafl = ( - l ) a £ (i>l-Ja,n ~ (2-23) and in the R sector we have TTaL = ( - l ) ^ 1 f j ( < - n ^ a , n - ^ a , - n V 4 , „ + ^ , 0 ^ , 0 - ^ (2.24) *aR = ( " I )" £ (tl,-Ja,n ~ $a,-J>l,n + ^ , 0 ^ , 0 - ^ (2.25) Equations (2.22)-(2.25) express the momentum of fa and fa in terms fermion number operators and imply that the momentum is discretized. Conse-quently X and Y are compactifled as discussed in the introduction. As discussed in [3] the mapping to fermions described above is not one-to-one which requires us to investigate the compactification process. The goal of the next section will be to find the projection which makes the map one-to-one. 12 Chapter 2. Fermionization of X' 2.1 Compactification at the self-dual radius As discussed above, when X and Y are compactified at the self dual radius they have momenta and winding numbers that take on discrete values PxL + PxR = V2mx , pxL - PXR = V2wx (2.26) PYL + PYR = V2mY , PYL - PYR = V2WY (2.27) where m x . m y , W X , W Y € Z . Writing write these conditions in terms in terms of the momenta of 4>\ and <fo gives the following system of equations 7T1L + 7T2L + TT\R + 7T2R = 2mX (2.28) 1~1L - 7T2L + TTlR ~ T^2R = 2mx (2.29) 7T1L + 7T2L - 'u1R - n 2 R = 2mx (2.30) TTlL - 7T2L - TTiR + 7T2/J = 2mx • (2-31) In order for these equations to be satisfied the momenta 7ri_, ~K\R, t^ihi ~~2R must either all be integers or all be half-odd integers. As a result using (2.22)-(2.25) the fermions ip\ and ip2 must either both be Neveu-Schwarz(NS) or Ramond(R). The final step to obtain all of the bosonic states is to project out states that do not satisfy one of (2.28)-(2.31). For example we can take the projection operator to be p - I [ l + (_iyiL-*2L-KlR+*2R^ (2.32) In the fermionic language this corresponds to all states in which the total fermion number is even. 2.2 The boundary state in fermion variables We will write the double boundary state as \BD) to signify that it contains information about the boundary conditions of both the X and Y bosons. To find the fermionized version of \BD) we must first rewrite the boundary condition(2.2) in terms of the fermion variables. We find that the first term in (2.2) is given by 1 r dTX{0,cr) 2% : Vl (0 ,cr )^_(0 ,a) : V 4 ( 0 , a y V f l ( 0 , < r ) : where ip'L R and i/'L.fi a r e 4 L.R A;L,R 2;L,R i>L,R (2.33) (2.34) 13 Chapter 2. Fermionization of X° We use the Dirichlet boundary condition on Y to find that eiX{*P)\BD) = e ^ x ^ + Y ^ \ B D ) _ e\/2i^iL(0,<7)ev^i^iB(0,<7)|^g^ _ 2,2 • eV2i<t>iL(0,a) .. e\/2ict>iR(0,o-) . \BD) = z2ip\L(o,a)c;1L.<;lRMo,<r)\BD} = ±Zm(0,a)(l + o3)ipR(0,a)\BD) (2.35) where the infinite constant Z2 comes from normal ordering ev/2»<i>iL(<V) a n c j eV2i<s>iR(p,a) _ Absorbing Z2 into the coupling constant g is the only renor-malization that is required. Note that the power of the cutoff makes g a marginal coupling. Through an analogous argument the last term in (2.2) is given by e - i X ( 0 » | B £ ) ) = e-i(X(0,a)-Y(0,*))\BD) = ± Z 2 ^ ( 0 , a ) ( l - a 3 ) ^ ( 0 , a ) | B D ) (2.36) so that the boundary condition written in fermion variables is given by [: i>l<r3il>L : - : ip]R^ijjR : +7r<?4 (1 + a 3 ) ipR - itgtfL ( l - a 3 ) j>R]\BD) = 0. (2.37) It was shown in [1] that the state \BD) which satisfies (2.37) and the level matching condition ^ L n — L_„^ \BD) = 0 is given by \BD)NS = 2-4 T J exp l ^_rU-liali>-r-^_ricjlUnj)_r |0> (2.38) in the NS-NS sector and \BD)R 2 4 Y[ exp n=l x exp • + -+> (2.39) in the R-R sector.2 Since the Ramond sector contains eight zero modes, the ground state is 16-fold degenerate. Here we define | ) as 2 Equa t ions (2.38) and (2.39) differ from their counterparts in [1] by a factor of 2 - 1 / 4 because our definition of the normalization constant (1.12) already contains the factor of 2 - 1 / 4 f l o m the Xo boson state. The factor of 2 - 1 / 4 that remains i n these equations comes from the Y boundary state. 14 Chapter 2. Fermionization of X° the state which is annihilated by all positively moded operators as well as V'I.OI V'I.OJ "02,0 and ip2,o- The other 16 ground states are created by act-ing with variousV^o a n d 4>lo o n I )• The phase convention we adopt gives creation operators ordered as ip\ 0 , i/>j 0 , 0 , %j>\ o a P m s sig1 1-For example the ground state given in (2.39) is given by | — | h) = ^1,0^2,0 I )• The matrix U has the property UU* — 1 for real values and is given by U V1 - i~2gg -iirg —ing e27TlA\/l — ir2gg (2.40) One may be surprised to discover that the parameter A denned in (1.4) reap-pears in this matrix despite the fact that is absent from the boundary state condition (1.10). The reason is that certain partition functions constructed from the boundary state depend on it. A thorough discussion of this can be found in [3]. 15 C h a p t e r 3 C a l c u l a t i o n o f / i ( x u We see from equation (1.18) that f(x°,x0) = {x0,x0\B)x0iJt0 (3.1) and h{x°, x°) = {x°, x° \aiai\ B)xoxo (3.2) where we have denned 1 1 x° = -j= (xL + xR) , x° = -j= {xL - xR). (3.3) The new variable x° has been introduced because we have treated X° as if it were compactified. It is the variable whose conjugate momentum is the winding number. As a result we expect that once we decompactify \B), f and h should not depend on x°. The position eigenstate itself can be expressed in terms of the momentum eigenstate via a fourier transform o^o, _ ^XL^X*^*^XL^XR)& (3.4) PXL,PXR [x , x | = 2_, e so that the quantities we need are C = (PXL,PXR\B) and D = (pxL>PXR\ai^i\B). At this point we will relate the inner product (J>XL,PXR\B) which we can-not calculate directly to the double boson boundary inner product (PXL,PXR,PYL,PYR\BD) which we can calculate using the method of fermionization. Since the Y bo-son was introduced by hand we can set PYL = PYR = 0. As discussed in [1] the inner product of the zero momentum states of the Y boson with its Dirichlet state gives a factor of 2~4 so that (PXL,PXR,PYL = 0,pYR = 0\BD) = 2? (pXL,PXR\B). (3.5) Remembering that pYL = ^ (T~IL ~ ~~2L) and pYR = ^ (T~IR - ~~2R), allows us to unclutter our notation by defining TT_ = 7ri_ = = -J^PXL 16 Chapter 3. Calculation of h(x°) and irR = -K\R = 7_ f l = -^PXR- Similarly, the Y boson contribution to (PXL,PXR,PYL — 0,PYR = 0\ai&i\BD) is 2~5 so that we can relate {PXL,PXR,PYL = 0,PYR = 0 | a i d i | B D ) = 2*(pxL,PXR\a\ai\B) (3.6) where it is important to remember that the oscillators a\, oc\ are associated with the X° boson. 3.1 NS sector In section 2.1 we concluded that in the NS sector (TT_, TTR) are both integers. The work done in [3] shows that the momentum eigenstate |7r_, irR) cor-responds to a fermion state that is filled up to a Fermi level. l l 7T_ > 0,7TR > 0 (TT^TTfl l = (0| __ WllM __ (^Ir) (3'7) r=7; 1 _I 2 r~2 1 1 WL-2 - ^ - 2 7r L >0 ,7 r„<0 (TT^TTfl l = (0| T J ( ^ V l r ) n ^ 1 ^ ) ^ 1 1 r=2 r = 2 i l nL < 0,nR > 0 ( 7 r L , 7 T f i | = (0| JJ (V>U2r) _ _ f > 2 r $ r ) (3.9) l l 1 1 -7TL-2 • -HR-2 7 T _ < 0 , 7 T R < 0 <7r_,, 7T« | = (0| JJ ( V ^ r ) ( ^ D (3"10) 1 _I 2 r _ 2 We give these states explicitly in the dual form for the convenience of our later calculations. 3.1.1 {ITLITR\BD)NS The boundary state in the NS sector was given in section 2.2 l 0 0 \BD)NS = 2"4 YI exp ^-rU~lioli>-r - 4>lri<?lUil>-r\ |0) (3.11) l R=2 17 Chapter 3. Calculation of h(x°) and is repeated here for the convenience of the reader. Since the calculation of f(x°) was previously performed in [1] we will show only the technique used there by calculating (TTL,TTR\B, D)NS for 7TL > 0,TR > 0 " 2 (irL,nR\B,D)NS = TJ -(0\ (4<r12fr) (ftr<r12*j>r) \BD)NS TL-2 = 2 " 1 / 4 (T r (a 1 2 ( i f / -V 1 ) a 1 2 t ( - i c r 1 (7 ) ) ) ' = 2 - 1 / 4 ( - i ( 7 1 2 ) 2 ^ < 5 ( 7 r L - ^ ) . In this equation the matrix cr 12 is given by a1 - a 2 > C12 (3.12) (3.13) where az, i = 1,2,3 are the Pauli spin matrices. Using equation (3.5) we find 1 ( _ i [ / 1 2 ) V 2 p X L 24(JPXL,PXR\B) = / 4 — V 2 5 ( P X L - P X R ) C = ( - i L 7 1 2 ) ^ ^ ( p X L - p X R ) . In [1] this same technique was used to find [UN]-^XI-5{pxL + PXR) PXL<0,PXR>0 [-iU2i]~'/2pxLS{pxL-PXR) PXL < 0,PXR < 0 0 \PXL\ \PXR\ (3.14) C=l (3.15) for the other momentum ranges. The only case left to consider is PXL = PXR = 0, one can easily check that this gives (PXL = 0 PXR = 0\B) = 1 (3.16) 18 Chapter 3. Calculation of h(x°) 3.1.2 Ca lcu la t ion of 7rR\aiai\BD)^s The next goal is to calculate D — (pxL PXR\aia\\B). We must first find a* and a* in fermion variables. Notice that we have introduced the label X to emphasize that these are oscillators of the X boson. Matching up like powers of z and z on both sides of the equations in (2.11)-(2.14) gives the oscillator modes of fa and fa in terms of the fermion modes / *a,n = ( - 1 ) ° 1 £ Vl.mV'a.n-m=Z+± m=Z+i (3.17) (3.18) where, as a reminder, a= l gives oscillators associated with fa and a=2 gives oscillators associated with fa. Matching up like powers of z and z in (2.4) we get 1 1 71 (di i + d 2 , i ) . Using this with (3.17) and (3.18) we can write J2 ^y^-(3.19) (3.20) m=Z+i The rest of the calculation is somewhat involved and given in the appendix, the results are D [-iU12]y/*PXL6(pXL - PXR) PXL > 0,PXR > 0 -[U22r^PXLS(pXL+PXR) PXL > 0,pXR < 0 -[UU]-V2~PXL8(J>XL + PXR) PXL<0,PXR>0 [-iU21]-^PXL5(j>xL - PXR) PXL < 0,PXR < 0 l - 2 f 7 n ( 7 2 2 PXL=PXR = 0 0 \PXL\ ¥= \PXR\ (3.21) 3.2 Ramond Sector In the Ramond sector iti and TTR both take half-odd integer values. The calculations of C = (pxL PXR\B) and D = (J>XL PXR\&\a\\B) in this sector 19 Chapter 3. Calculation of h(x°) are almost identical to that of the NS sector except that one must take the degenerate ground states into consideration. In [1] (pxL PXR\B) was calculated to be the same as in the NS sector C= { { [-iUn}^PXLS{pXR-PXR) PXL > 0,PXR > 0 [U22]^H(pXR + PXL) PXL > 0,PXR < 0 [Un}-^PXLX(PXL + PXR) PXL <0,PXR > 0 [-iU2l]-^xl-S(pxL+PXR) PXL < 0,pXR < 0 0 \PXL\ ^ \PXR\ (3.22) The calculation of (7r_ -KR\a\a\\BD) R is once again quite involved so we reserve it for the appendix and state the results here D=l [-iUi2]V2pxL6{pxL ~ PXR) PXL > 0,pXR > 0 -[U22]^PXLS(pxL + PXR) PXL > 0,PXR < 0 -[UU]-^PXH(PXL+PXR) PXL<0,PXR>0 [-iU2i}~^PXLS(pxL - PXR) PXL < 0,PXR < 0 0 \PXL\ ^ \PXR\ (3.23) 3.3 Summary and Final Calculation In this section we summarize our results and use them to complete the calculation. In the preceding subsections we found that [-iUn]'/2~PXL6(pxR-PXR) PXL > 0,pXR > 0 [U22]^H(PXR + PXL) PXL>0,PXR<0 C=l Pn}~^PXLS(pxL + PXR) PXL<0,PXR>0 (324.) [-iU21]-^H{pXL + PXR) PXL<0,pXR<0 1 PXL = PXR = 0 0 \PXL\ ^ \PXR\ where -^PXL a n d -J^PXR are either both integers or both half-odd integers. Now we can calculate the matrix element f(x°,x°) = (x°,x0\B) where 20 Chapter 3. Calculation of h(x°) (x°,x°\ was given by (3.4). We find that oo (x°,x°\B) = l + £ [ ( e - V 1 1 r + ( e - ^ V 2 2 r n=l • +(ei*0(-iU12)r + (e-i*°(-iU12))n} 1 1 + 1 - Uneixo 1 - U22e~ix° 1 1 +-1 + iUi2eixo l + iU2ie-ix° - 3 (3.25) The final step is to decompactify f(x°,x°) by integrating over all allowed values of A, giving f(x°) = f1 dA(x°,x°\B) Jo 1 + ngelx° 1 + nge IX° - 1. (3.26) We see that the integration over A eliminates the coordinate x° and gives the expected value of / ( x ° ) The calculation of h(x°) is almost the same. The matrix element D = (pxL,PXR\ai®i\B) was calculated in the previous sections to be f [-iU12]V*PXLS(pxL ~ PXR) PXL > 0 , P X R > 0 -[U22]V2pxlS(PXL + PXR) PXL > 0 , P X R < 0 -[UU]-^XI-5(PXL + PXR) PXL < 0 , P X R > 0 [-iU21]-^PXL6{pxL-PXR) PXL < 0,pXR < 0 l-2UnU22 P x L = p X R = 0 0 \PXL\ \PXR\ We can now calculate h(x°, x°) = (a;0, x° | a jd i | B)XQ x 0 D (3.27) h(x°,x°) = l + J2[-(eiA°Un)n-(e-ti0U22)n n=l + WX (-iUi2)T + (e~ix {-iUn)T] -1 + - 1 1 - Uneix° 1 - U22e~ix° + Y T ^ + i + l u 2 l e ^ + l - 2 U ^ - ( 3 ' 2 8 ) 21 Chapter 3. Calculation of h(x°) Once again we can decompactify by integrating out A which gives h(x°) = f(x0)-2(1-n2gg). (3.29) 22 \ C h a p t e r 4 N u m b e r o f M a s s l e s s S t r i n g s E m i t t e d 4.1 1-point functions Following the discussion in section 1.4, the 1-point function for the produc-tion of a closed string field with M2 = 0 from the boundary \B) is given by (*B\%\B), , (4.1) where \^B) is the on-shell B R S T invariant state for the M2 = 0 level | *B ) =e^a1 1 a1 1 |0 ,0;fc)®|U) (4.2) and we remind the reader that we are in Minkowski space. The polarization tensor eM„ has 24 x 24 components coming from restric-tions e / J 1 /fc' i = e^vkv = Q , ^ e^K and eM„ ^ k^eu. A full review of how to obtain this state and its restrictions is given in the appendix. The calculation of the 1-point function can be split into two inner prod-ucts < * B | ^ = - ^ | B ) = A r p e ^ ( 0 , 0 ; f c | a K | S ) x o | B ) i x ( U | ^ ^ | B ) 6 c i (4.3) where we can find \B)X° by analytically continuing (1.18) back to Minkowski space \B)X0 = Jdt (f(t)\t) - h(t)a°_,att\t) + ...) (4.4) where and / f f l = T - L ^ + 1 , / - - t - l (4-5) 1 + Ttge 1 1 + irge 1 h(t) = f(t)-2{l-ir2gg). . (4.6) 23 Chapter 4. Number of Massless Strings Emitted The ghost part of (4.3) is evaluated to be ( I I | ^ - = - ^ | B ) f c c = i a i K c o - ^ ^ + c o ^ C i ^ f e - i l U ) = (11 ICQCQI II) (4.7) so that (4.3) simplifies to ^ B \ ^ ^ \ B ) = iMp e ^ ( 0 , 0 ; f c K d r | B ) X o | S ) ; 25 ='• iMp (0,0; k\ ^ e o o a K + E e a a i d i J \B)Xo\B)x = -iMp J dteiEt{2Trf6p(ki)F{t) (4.8) where F(t) is given by (p 25 \ -^2en- £ ejj (4.9) i=i i=P+i / and E = \k±_\ is the energy of the closed strings. We now see that the 1 point function is in the form given in equation (1.35) (*B\c£\B)(k) = -iA ^ ( 2 7 r ) ^ ( f c < ) (P 25 i=\ j=p+i '(4.10) where the integrals If and Ih are given by /oo dtf(t)eiEt ' (4.11) -oo /oo Aft,(i)eijEi -oo = If-2(1-Tr2gg)6(E). (4.12) We can never move to the rest frame of a particle with M 2 = 0 therefore the delta function on the right hand side of (4.12) always gives 0 allowing us to set f = Ih- This is another way of saying that h(x°) = f(x°) up to terms that are non-singular in x° 24 Chapter 4. Number of Massless Strings Emitted The integral If can be calculated If = -i(e E In ng _ ^iE In ng sinh(7TjE) ' (4.13) Using equation (1.26) with (4.10) as our j(k) we can write down an ex-pression for the number per volume of massless closed string modes emitted by the brane (2n)D-i 2E d25~Pk \If\2 N 2 f *-rk If\2^ Vp p J (27T)25-P 2E 25 eoo E e « - E ~33 j=p+l (4.14) In the above equation the sum is over a basis of polarization tensors. This sum is well known [9] and we provide a brief review of how to evaluate it in the appendix. We can gain information by splitting the sum into three parts, a sum over the polarizations of the gravitonSc dilaton 5$ and antisymmetric tensor SB E 25 eoo + E e « - E So + SB + S$ with SG = ip(24 - p), SB = 0, 5$ = 24 - ip(24 - p). (4.15) (4.16) We can use this result to find out how many gravitons and dilatons are emitted from a decaying Dp-brane 3 ^ = N2\p(24-p)Ip ^ = M2(24-\p{24-p))Ip as well as the total number of particles emitted (4.17) (4.18) N_ v„ = 24M/IP (4.19) 3 5 a = 0 gives no antisymmetric tensors being emitted by the Dp-brane 25 Chapter 4. Number of Massless Strings Emitted where h = d2^k 2 (2TT) 2 5-P d25-i>k -iE\n(ixg) _ iEln(-ng) (2TT) 2 5-P 2Esmh2TiE In conclusion the total number of massless closed strings emitted is N of d25~Pk (4.20) 2 f d25~pk TT2 ~ p J (2n)^-P2Esmh27rE iE\n(ng) _ iEln(-irg) (4.21) We see that for the case of the full brane we can proceed no further, our solution will depend on our choice of g. For the case of the half S-brane equation (4.11) is evaluated to be / / = _ i ( e - ^ > - 9 ) _ ^ _ (4.22) sinh(-7rS)" Upon inserting this into the first line of (4.21) we see that N_ _ 2 f d25-Pk Vp ~ 2 4 7 V p J (2TT)25-Z> 2£s inh^7r£l (4.23) is independent of g. In the next section we explicitly calculate the number of closed strings emitted by a decaying half S-brane. 4 . 2 Number of Massless Strings Emitted by Half Brane Inserting (4.22) into the first line of (4.20) gives d25~pk (2TT) 2 5-P 2 £ s i n h 2 7 r £ 27t(25-P) /2 dx-r 2 3 - p (4.24) 2 r((25 - P)/2)(2TT) 2 5 -P J0 sinh 2(7ra;) which can be integrated numerically. We expect this integral to diverge when p = 22,23,24,25 by inspection. Below we give a table showing the number of gravitons and dilations emitted per volume for various values of P-26 Chapter 4. Number of Massless Strings Emitted p h NG/VP N^/Vp N/Vp 0 9.47 x 10" 18 0 0.262 .262 1 3.14 x 10" 17 3.39 x 10" -3 .0179 .0213 2 1.07 x 10- 16 5.16 x 10--4 1.28 x 10" -3 1.84 x 10" -3 3 3.72 x 10- 16 7.07 x 10" -5 9.09 x 10" -5 1.65 x 10" -4 4 1.32 x 10- 15 8.06 x 10" -6 6.48 x 10" -6 1.45 x 10" -5 5 4.85 x 10- 15 8.90 x 10 -7 4.61 x 10" -7 1.35 x 10" -6 11 2.23 x 10" -11 1.63 x 10--12 1.14 x 10- 14 1.64 x 10" -12 12 1.04 x 10" -10 1.94 x 10" -13 0 1.94 x 10--13 13 5.04.x 10--10 2.37 x 10" -14 1.65 x 10--16 2.38 x 10" -14 20 2.46 x 10" -4 4.33 x 10' -20 3.47 x 10--20 7.79 x 10" -20 21 1/967T 1.16 x 10" -20 1.49 x 10- 20 2.66 x 10--20 Table 4.1: Number of particles emitted with M 2 = 0 for half S-brane. 27 Chapter 5 Total Number of Particles Emitted We begin by reminding the reader the total number of particles emitted can be expressed as a product of partition functions N = Im (iix j°° d\(B\ (b^Co)qLo+L°-it\B)) . (5.1) We call these partition functions is because they were obtained from open string partition functions via the gluing procedure described in the intro-duction. The spatial and ghost partition functions are straight forward to complete giving ZNN = (N\qLo+Li\N) oo 1 = «- i / 1 2 n -—^2nm (5-2) n=l 7 in the Neumann directions, with 2ir5(0) interpreted as a volume factor and ZDD = (D\qL°+Lo\D) - . -• '"nnWs«* (5-3) in the Dirichlet directions, and Zghost = bc(B\(b+c^)qLo+L"\B)bc OO = iq^X\^-d2n? (5.4) n=l for the ghosts. The only non-trivial part left to calculate is the partition function in the time direction. After analytic continuation to Euclidean space it seems as simple as computing Z(bd\bd) = {BD\qL°+L°\BD)NS + (BD\qL°+L°\BD)R. (5.5) 28 Chapter 5. Total Number of Particles Emitted and factoring out the contribution from the Y boson. We remind the reader that \BD)NS = 2-3 FT exp |0> (5.6) \BD)R = 2"4 f[ exp x e x p f ^ t / - 1 ^ 1 ^ ! + (5-7) and (L(j + L ° )7vs J2 r {f-r^r + </>-rV4 + $lrj>r + ^ - r # ) ~ g(5.8) r=l/2 oo ^ £ r ( V l r l ^ r + V » - r $ + ^ l P 1 r V + l £ - r $ ) + 3- (5-9) r = l The boundary state )5Z) | which satisfies the dual form of (1.10) is given by 1 0 0 (BD\NS = 2~4 (0| JJ exp [ ^ L ? - 1 ^ 1 ^ , . - ^ V t t y r ] " (5-10) {BD\R = 2 " 4 (- + - + I JJ exp [ ^ f f - 1 ^ 1 ^ - ftni*lUfl>. x exp -i>\io liJ^ (5.11) The matrices £/ and [7 are of the same form as (2.40) but differ only by the definition of the parameter A. We will label A2 as the parameter living at the r = 0 boundary of the cylinder and A\ as the parameter living at the T = — boundary. As discussed in the introduction we integrate over A = A\ — A2 to decompactify the boson. In [3] it was shown that (5.5) depends only on the eigenvalues of the matrix (—io-lU)(Uia^). These eigenvalues are given by C = cos(27rA)(l - 7r2gg) + n2gg ± i\J\ - (cos(27rJ4)(l - ir2gg) + ir2gg)2 (5.12) 29 Chapter 5. Total Number of Particles Emitted where A = A\ — A2. Reference [1] also tells us that after evaluating (5.5) and factoring out the ZDD contribution from the Y boson, Z b b = = C q l A q_1/12 ~ i ( 5 1 3 ) \neZ / n=l We have attempted many different ways to bring our result back to Mikowski space and all have failed. There is only method which gives a clear indication as to why it fails. This method begins by checking that we get the expected result for the total number in the Neumann limit of the boundary state (5.2). Substituting our partition functions into (5.1) we get V P + i 24 25-p' (5.14) which can be split into two parts = -Trim / dX 0A\> + / dX—-Lj-i (5.15) VP+i~ """Vo ^ ) Jo rj"(=± with m) = ( / f e ^ ) . (5.16) We now observe that in the first integral A is analytic in the upper half plane which allows us to rotate this contour to the positive imaginary axis. Simi-larly, in the second integral A is analytic in the lower half plane which allows us to rotate this contour to the negative imaginary axis. After rotating these contours we see that these two integrals cancel one another giving N = 0 (5.17) exactly as expected for a static D-brane. It was thought that perhaps a similar rotation could be used for the unstable D-brane. One can see from (5.13),however, that it is impossible to consistently perform an analogous Wick rotation. The reason is that the n 2 in q'r is the discretized version of the square of momentum in the time direction, so as we rotate back to Minkowski space n2 —> —n 2. This makes e~lX~ non-analytic in the upper half plane, so that the first integral is neither analytic in the upper half 30 Chapter 5. Total Number of Particles Emitted plane nor in the lower half plane. The same argument can be applied to the second integral. This lack of analyticity prevents us from rotating these contours at all. The exception of course is n = 0 which is just the same as the Neumann case. 31 Chapter 6 Summary and Conclusion We have calculated the total number of massless particles emitted by a decaying Dp-brane in the covariant gauge using the method of fermionization Vp - p J (2rr)25-P 2E ' [ j For the full brane \Ij(E)\2 can be found by taking g = g in (4.13). For the half brane | / / ( i ? ) | 2 was given by (4.22). We have written ^ - in this form to compare with the massless contribution to the total number obtained in [2] l ^ / E ^ l / , ^ ) ! ' . (6.2) The sum s includes both the sum over level n as well as over the momenta transverse to the brane and they found that only left-right symmetric states contribute to their sum. Also, we are taking their result \If(Es)\2 as inte-grated along the real contour for both the full brane and half brane, so as to be able to make a comparison. In their expression Es — \fk2 + M2 so at the massless level Es = E. So we see that their result agrees with ours, after picking up a factor of 24 from the 24 left-right symmetric states at this level. We have also attempted to verify (6.2) using the fermionic technique but we have been unsuccessful due to the ambiguity in rotating our result back to Minkowski space. 32 Bibliography [1] M . Hassefield, Taejin Lee, G . W . Semenoff, and P .C .E . Stamp. Critical boundary sine-gordon revisited. arXiv:hep-th/0512219v2, 2006. [2] Neil Lambert, Hong L iu , and Juan Maldacena. Closed strings from decaying D-branes. arXiv:hep-th/0303139, 2003. [3] T. Lee and G . W . Semenoff. Fermion representation of the rolling tachyon boundary conformal field theory. arXiv:hep-th/0502236vl, 2005. [4] J . Polchinski. String Theory, volume 1 of Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, 2004, c2001. [5] A . Sen. Non-BPS states and branes in string theory. arXiv:hep-th/9904207vl, 1999. [6] A . Sen. Rolling tachyon. arXiv:hep-th/0203211, 2002. [7] A . Sen. Tachyon dynamics in open string theory. arXivrhep-th/0410103v2, 2004. [8] Ashoke Sen. Rolling tachyon boundary state, conserved charges and two dimensional string theory. JHEP, 0405:076, 2004. [9] S. Weinberg. Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell's and Einstein's equations. Physical Review, 138(4B), 1965. 33 Appendix A Calculation of (nL nR\aiai\BD) A . l (irL 7TR\aiai\BD)NS We begin by writing out some of the equations and results from section 3 for the convenience of the reader. The first of these is the boundary state (2.38) written in fermion variables in the NS sector \BD)NS = 2 _ 4 f[ exp UlrU-Ha^-r - 4>lri<TlUiP-r] |0) (A.l) and we will also require the dual form of the momentum states l l * X - 2 " " ' H - 2 *L,*R > 0 < 7 T L ) ^ | = (0| ]J (V4r lM I I (Ml) (A-2) 1 1 -•"R-2 KL,-KR>0 (lTL,7TR\ = (0| rj (4ri>lr) f J ^ U (A-3) - 7 T L --nL,7TR>0 {nL,7rR\ = (0\ (^ Uar) I I (^ir) (A-4) 1 1 - 7 T L - 2 irL,iTR<0 (nL,irR\ = (0\ J] (^ U*) I I ( M i ) (A.5) 34 Appendix A. Calculation of (TTL -KR\a\a.\\BD) Placed between these two states we have the a x a x operator written in terms of fermion variables (3.20) t ( ^ V i -n = Z + ± (A.6) A . l . l 7 r L > 0 , 7 r F L > 0 After acting with (A.6) to the left on the bra momentum state only two terms in each of the sums survive (ni TT[i\aiai\BD)NS X{TTL ^r(^L(7ri/_1/2)^3^i+i/2 + ^ +1/2CT3^_(7ri_i)) x (^+i/2^3^-(^-i/2) + ^ l ( ^ _ 1 / 2 ) ^ 3 ^ i + i / 2 ) \BD)NS. (A.7) Noticing that the right hand side of (A.7) can be broken down into the product of two inner products 2 l / 4 S(TTL - 7 r R ) ( 7 r L - 1,7T L - 1\BD)NS x ( 0 | ( ^ C T i 2 ^ ) ( ^ t ( c r i 2 ) t ^ ) ( V ) t i r C 7 3 V ) r + i + ^ r + i 0 - ^ _ r ) x ($ + 1 a 3 </ i_ r + -<pLro-3jr+i)\BD)NS (A.8) where we have set r = irr, — 1/2 in order to unclutter our equations. The first inner product we have already calculated in (3.12) (TTL - 1 ,TT L - l\BD)NS = 2174 ( - i t / j a ) 2 ^ " 1 ) . (A.9) To evaluate the second inner product we first act the very last term in brackets on \BD)NS followed by acting (i/>lr<73i/v+1 + ipl+la3ip-r) on everything to the right of it so as to eliminate the r+1 modes x (-V>L ( r + 1 ) (^V )cT 3 ^_ r - ^_ro-3{ic-lU)i>_{R+L))\BD)NS x {iplr<j3{iU-lal)a34>„r - ^_ra3{ialU)a3^-R)\BD)NS. (A.10) 35 Appendix A. Calculation of (TTL irR\a\a\\BD) Next we anti-commute away the r modes in the final line of (A. 10) to get - (0|(V4a 1 2 Vv ) ($a 1 2 t Vv) x ( ^ . ^ ( i t f - V y 3 ^ - 4-y(^1U)<J3iP-r)\BD)NS = (0\i>y 2 [^(iU-1*1)*3] a12t</v - &oX2X [a3{ialU)a3} *LHr\BD)NS = -(t)\iplcjl2(iU-lo-l)o-l2\ialU)il>-r + ^ral2\ia1U)a12(iU-la1)^-r\BD)NS Tr(o-l2{iU-lal)a12\ialU)) + Tr{al2\ialU)al2{iU-la1)) Tr{al2{iU-lal)al2\ialU)) 1 ' 2 1 / 4 L 2 " 2 1 / 4 . ^ ( i l Z - V 1 ) ! ! ^ 1 ! / ^ 2 (-it/12)2. 12t/„- l j ( A . l l ) Substituting (A.9) and ( A . l l ) into (A.8) we complete the desired calculation (A.12) fa TTR\a\ai\BD)NS = -^(-iUn)27rLS(TvL - irR) A.1.2 7 r L > 0 , 7 r f l < 0 Following the same lines of reasoning as in the previous subsection we can arrive at the equivalent of equation (A.8) by taking that (717, -KR\aiai\BD)NS 2 l / 4 — x(-XL + nR)(nL-l,-(irL-l)\BD)Ns X ( 0 | ( ^ a 1 V r ) ( ^ O - 1 2 ^ r ) ( ^ L P a 3 ^ r + i + ^ + 1 ( 7 3 ^ _ r ) x{^l+1a'i^r + 4_ra:ii>r+i)\BD)Ns. (A.13) The first inner product was given in (3.15) by fa - 1, - f a - = 7 ^ {U22?{*L-l) (A.14) and we can find the second inner product by taking the third last line of ( A . l l ) and also remembering to pick up an extra minus sign 36 Appendix A. Calculation of (TTL KR\a\a\\BD) between the second and third line, giving NS = ^f4 [Tr(a^(iU-W)a^U))] = -^(iU-'a^ia'U)^ = -7^( t/22) 2 . (A.15) Substituting (A.14) and (A.15) into (A.13) we get the result fa TrR\a1a1\BD)NS = (U22)2^ «5fa + rrR). (A.16) A.1.3 vrL<0,7rFL>0 This time we take a12 —> crl2\ so that (A.8) becomes fa nR\aiai\BD)Ns 2 1 / 4 — < ^ f a + ^ f l ) f a + 1 , - f a + 1)\BD)NS ( 0 | ( ^ a 1 2 V r ) ( ^ o - 1 2 t ^ ) ( ^ L ^ 3 ^ + 1 + NS-2 T r - ^ 1 2 ^ ^ - 1 ^ 1 ) ^ 1 2 ^ ^ 1 ^ ) ) (A.17) Once again we can evaluate the first inner product using (3.15) fa + 1, - f a + l)\BD)NS = ^ {Unr^L+l) (A.18) and taking cr 1 2 —> <r12^ in the third last line of ( A . l l ) we get (0|(v4a12tVv)(V;V2tVv)(V< V V v + i + NS 2 1 / 4 = - ^ ( ^ - V M ^ C / ^ = - ^ n ) 2 . (A.19) 37 Appendix A. Calculation of (717, -n^aiai\BD) for the second inner product. Substituting (A.19) and (A.18) in (A.17) we find {nLirR\a1a1\BD)NS = (Un)~^L S(nL + nR). (A.20) A.1.4 7 r L < 0 , 7 r R < 0 For this case we need to take a 1 2 —> a 1 2 ^ and a12^ —> a12 so that equation (A.8) becomes (717, -KR\a\a\\BD)NS 2 l / 4 . -j-S(nL + nR)(nL+l,TrL+l\BD)NS x(4>l+1a3^r + ^lra3^r+l)\BD)NS. (A.21) Using (3.15) we can find the first inner product ( T T L +l,nL+ 1\BD)NS = ^ {-iU^)-2{^L+l) (A.22) and taking a12 -> <r12t and a 1 2 t -> a12 in the third last line of (A.11), we get x^l+la3^r + ^_ra3A+1)\BD)NS Tr(a12]\iU-lal)(jl2{ialU)) 2 "2V4 L = 4 h [ ~ i U 2 l ) 2 - ( A - 2 3 ) for the second inner product. Substituting (A.21) and (A.22) into (A.23) we find (TTl nR\a1a1\BD)NS = ^ (-W2^ S(nL-nR) (A.24) 38 Appendix A. Calculation of (TTL irR\a\a\\BD) A.1.5 7 r L = 0,7T f i = 0 We see that by acting (3.20) to the left on the bra (717, = 0 TTR = 0| only one term in each sum survives (irL = QirR = 0\a1ai\BD)NS' = - \ ( Q \ (^1/2^1/2) ( ^ / 2 ^ i / 2 ) \BD)NS = - i ( 0 | ^ / 2 a 3 [ « r 1 ^ t r 3 [ » C / - 1 c r 1 ] ^ _ 1 / 2 | S £ ) ) A f s 1 2 • 2V4 1 Tr[o- 3(cr 1C/)cT 3((7-V 1)] 2i/4 1 (U12U21 + UnU22) = 2^( l -2 f /n I /22) . A . 2 (TTL 7Tij |Q!iQ:i |BD) i2 (A.25) Again we will rewrite the fermion boundary state (2.39) in the Ramond sector 1 0 0 \BD)R = 2 -4 JT exp j ^ t / " 1 ^ 1 ^ - ^ L ^ C / V - n ] n=l x exp 4U-Iial^0] | - + - + ) (A.26) as well as the momentum states from [1] for this sector 1 1 7rL,TTR>0 (nL,7rR\ = (0U J J ( ^ m ) ] J ( A " 2 7 ) n=1 n=1 1 1 T r L , - T r f l > 0 ( 7 r L , r r f l | = (0| 2 J J ( ^ m ) II ( & " $ n ) (A.28) 1 1 - T L — 2 * " R - 2 - T r L , T r R > 0 ( T r L j T T f l | = (0| 3 (V-L^n) I ] ( ^L ) - (A .29) 1 1 - T i , ~ 2 ~nR—2 irL,irR<0 (TTL,-KR\ = (0| 4 J T (VL^ n) J J ( & » $ n ) (A.30) 39 Appendix A. Calculation of"(ITL -K R\a\a\\B D) where the degenerate ground states are given by |0)i = | + - - + > (A.31) |0>2 = *! + + - - > (A.32) |0>3 = -%\ - - + +) - (A.33) |0) 4 = | - + + - ) . (A.34) In the Ramond sector the fermion modes are integers so that a x a x is \ (j2 ti^l-n) ( £ tl^l-rr) " (A-35) Vn=Z / \m=Z / A.2.1 7 r L > 0 I 7 r f i > 0 Acting (A.35) to the left on the momentum state gives the same result as in the NS sector, only two terms in each sum survive, (717, -KR\aiai\BD)R (TTL TTl| (^L(^_1/2)^3^L+I/2 + ^ +1/2^3V'-(7rL-i)) x (^ i + i /2 f f 3^-(^-i /2) + ^ L(^-i/2)^3^ i +i/2) \BD)R (A.36) and for wr, > 1/2 neither of these terms contains a zero mode. In this case the calculation is the same as in the NS sector, except that we still have to calculate the remaining zero mode parts (irL -KR\aia1\BD)R = 2U4 (-iUi2)2nL-1(+ ~ - + I exp[4u-lia^0}\- + - +> = ^(-iU12)2KLS(irR-irL) (A.37) 40 Appendix A. Calculation of (TTL -KR\a\a\\BD) where we have used the fact that if c is a Grassman variable then c 2 = 0. A special case occurs when TTL = 1/2, equation (A.36) becomes (1/2 1 / 2 1 0 ^ = -\(+ - ~ + I ( 4 ^ i + 4^o) (4^0 + 40^i>i) \BD)R = -\(+-- + \40^x4x^ + 4i^4y^i\BD)R •= ~ \ ((- + - + 1^ 1,1^ 1,1+ < + - + -\Mix)\BD)R • = 2 ~ f ^ ( 1 + < + ~ + - l e x P ^ ^ " 1 ^ 1 ^ ) ! - + - + > ) -iUi2 (A.38) 2V4 where in the second last line we have used the fact that {U-liax)lx{U-lial)22 - (U-1ia1)12(U-1ia1)2i = 1. (A.39) Thus we conclude that (rrL 7rR\a1al\BD)R = -L(-iU12)2^6(7rR - nL) (A.40) A.2.2 r r L > 0 , 7 r R < 0 Following the same lines of reasoning as in the previous subsection we can immediately write down the solution for %]_, > 1/2 (TTl nR\aiai\BD)R -^i(U22)2^-1(+ + - - | exp[4u~lialM\- + - +) -^(U22)2^6(7TR + nL) (A.41) 41 Appendix A. Calculation of (-Kj, itn\a.\a.\\BD) so that the only thing left to calculate is (1/2 -l/2\ala1\BD)R = -21(+ + - - I (fo^i + 1>Wik) (#<r3$o + V ^ i ) \BD)R = -\{+ + - - l^yMl^o + ^\a3Myfa\BD)R = - \ (<- + - + 1^1,1^,1 + { + - + - \BD)R U 2 2 -(1 +<+-+- I exp(^C/- 1Ja 1^ 0)| - + - +)) 2 - 2 V 4 1 A .2.3 TTL < 0,nR > 0 Once again we can immediately write down the solution for nr. < 1/2 (irL irR\aiai\BD)R = ^ i ( U n ) - 2 7 r L - 1 ( - - + +\^Pbi'lU-1ia^o}\- + -+) = -^(Un)-2«LS(«R + irL)- (A.43) Let's now calculate the special case TTL = —1/2 (1/2 -l/2\a1cl1\BD}R, ;(-- + + ! (Vi^ Vi + V^Vo) ($\<r3j>o'+ \BD)R = ^(-- + + \ 4 ^ ^ \ ^ o + 4(r3^la3fa\BD)R = ~ \ ( ( - + - + W 2 , i # , i + ( + - + - |^I,i^2,i) \BD)R 2 • 21/4 42 Appendix A. Calculation of (TTL 7TR | a io : i \BD) A.2 A 7 r L < 0 , 7 r i ? < 0 Once again we find (717, irR\aia\\BD)R = -^(U2ir2nL-l(- + + - I e x p ^ f / " 1 ^ 1 ^ ] ! - + - +) = ^(U2i)-27TL5(nR-nL) (A.45) for TVI < —1/2. Finally we consider the special case when TTI. = —1/2 ( -1 /2 -l/2\a1a1\BD)R = - \ ( - + + - I (Vo i^ + 4^o) ( $ ^ 0 + 4°34>i) \BD)R . = . -^(- + +-\40a3fa^a3^0 + 4a3iJo4a3fa\BD)R = -\((- + - + < + - + - \ B D ) R % U % 1 (1 + ( + - + - | e x p ^ t / - 1 ^ 1 ^ ) ! - + - + » 2 • 2V4 -iU2\ so that (A.46) (nL nR\a1a1\BD)R = -^(-iU21)-2"H(7rR - -KL) (A.47) 43 Appendix B BRST invariance of the M 2 = 0 state We begin by writing down the most general closed string state with M2 = 0 in D = 26 flat space-time dimensions + B c 6 - i 5 - i + B c c - i 6 - i + B 6 - 1 6 _ 1 + C c _ 1 5 _ 1 | 0 I 0 ; / c ) | | | ) (B . l ) and as was shown in [4] B R S T invariance of the ground state demands k2 = M2 = 0 and that the other degenerate ground states are not allowed. B R S T invariance demands that the charges O O O O / . QB= (CnL™n)+ 9 oCmCnb-rn-nl (B.2) n=—oo and m , n = —oo o o QB = ^2 (ajL™n) + ^2 -— - " ^ - m - n S (B.3) n=— o o m , n = — o o annihilate any physical state of the closed string spectrum. The operators L™n, L™n are the left and right moving matter Virasoro modes and % I indicates creation-annihilation normal ordering. Acting the holomorphic B R S T charge on | ^ c ) gives Q B | * C ) y (c - i fc^a^ + cik^ati) + CQ l * c ) + ( ^ 1 ) ( ^ i ) + B c ^ a ^ 1 5 - i + B~b-1(k^_1)}\0,0;k)\ | | ) (B.4) which demands that k^e^, = k^p^ = k^j^ = Be = /3M = B = 0 for physical 44 Appendix B. BRST invariance of the M2 = 0 state states. Acting the antiholomorphic B R S T charge on \$>c) gives CO | * c > = y - 2 - ( * ' V < £ 1 c _ i + ( ^ ) c - i b - i - ( V H c - i c - i . + (0,*of1)(kvav_1) + Bck^c-! + Bb-i(k^W,0; *) | | | ) '(B.5) which demands that We^v = k^j = Bc = (3^ = 0 for physical states. Eliminating unphysical states (B. l ) reduces to with the restrictions k^e^ = k^e^ = k^y^ = = 0 and k2 — 0. Some of these remaining states, however, are B R S T exact and have zero norm. B y inspection eliminating the zero norm states sets 7 = 7 = C = 0. One can also check that polarizations of the form e M „ = k^ev and = e^k^ have zero norm and can be eliminated. In conclusion the 24x24 states that are B R S T invariant and have positive norm are given by with the restrictions e/u/fc'*. = e^k" = 0, ^ e^k^ and ^ k^e, e ^ a ^ i O ^ i + 7 ^ o ; / l 1 c _ 1 + T ^ Q ^ C - I + Cc_ic_i |0, 0; | | ) , (B.6) |*B> = e ^ i « _ i | 0 , 0 ; A : > | | |) (B.7) 45 Appendix C Polarization sums We are interested in evaluating = X>£;(*)<£(*)- (c.i) A As discussed by Polchinski [4], the B R S T invariant states (B.7) derived in the previous appendix transform as a 2-tensor under SO(D — 2). Since this is a reducible representation any tensor gij can be decomposed as 9ij - \ [913 + 9ji ~ D _ 2SiJ9kkj + 2 (Sij ~ 9ji) + D _ 2xij9kk- (C.2) Under this decomposition reference [9] gives a method for computing (C . l ) for the graviton. We can also use this method for the dilaton and antisym-metric tensor so that ^fit/pa — \ J" \ (nwnw + nMCTn^ - ^ n ^ I l ^ ) Graviton • -5 ( n ^ I I ^ — n^n^) Antisymmetric Tensor •^z^U^Upcr Dilaton (C.3) where is the sum over polarizations of the gauge boson I V = $ » 2 . (C.4) A _ Note that there is no actual gauge boson, this is just a mathematical trick. Since (C.3) is rotationally invariant we choose a choice of coordinates such that = (A:0, 0,0, ...,fc 2 5), k° = k25 which gives linear polarizations e\ = (0,1,0,...); el = (0, 0,1, 0,...); e 2 4 = (0, 0 , 1 , 0 ) . This choice of coordinates gives non-zero as n i i = l;* = l , . . ,24 • (C.5) with no sum on i . 46 Appendix C. Polarization sums Following equation (4.15) we see that we are interested in calculating the special case n W i , „ with no sum on \x or v. Substituting (C.5) into (C.3) we see that the non-zero components of are UV D-2 n, Graviton 0 Antisymmetric Tensor Dilaton (C.6) l D - 2 with i,j = 1...24 and again no summation of the i's and j ' s . As advertised these sums are independent of k^. We can now simplify (4.15) to give S = Sq + SB + 5<j> = 25 eoo • E e - ~ E ^33 J=P+1 E 24 E e i i _ E p 24 p 24 (C.7) i=l J=p-|-1 and using equation (C.6) we can fully evaluate this sum for each of SG,SB and 5$ independently Sr i,j = l i,j=p-\-\ i=l j=p-\-l 1(24-p) SB = 0 (C.8) (C.9) , / P 24 p 24 E 1 - 2 E E 1 \i,3 = l i>3=P+\ C E = 2 4 - ^ ( 2 4 - p ) . Adding these together gives S = 24. (C.10) ( C . l l ) 47
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Number of closed strings emitted from a decaying D-brane
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Featured Collection
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Number of closed strings emitted from a decaying D-brane Conboy, Steven Lyle 2007
pdf
Notice for Google Chrome users:
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | Number of closed strings emitted from a decaying D-brane |
Creator |
Conboy, Steven Lyle |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Date Issued | 2007 |
Description | We have calculated in the covariant gauge the total number of massless closed strings emitted from a decaying Dp-brane using fermionization technology on the time component of the boundary state. This verifies the computation carried out in the less well known temporal gauge despite differences in renormalization schemes. In addition we have attempted to use the fermionic technique to calculate the total number of closed strings emitted. Our result is difficult to interpret due to the ambiguity involved with rotating it back to Minkowski space. |
Genre |
Thesis/Dissertation |
Type |
Text |
Language | eng |
Date Available | 2011-02-23 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
DOI | 10.14288/1.0084939 |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/31645 |
Degree |
Master of Science - MSc |
Program |
Physics |
Affiliation |
Science, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Department of |
Degree Grantor | University of British Columbia |
Campus |
UBCV |
Scholarly Level | Graduate |
AggregatedSourceRepository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- 831-ubc_2007-0367.pdf [ 1.78MB ]
- Metadata
- JSON: 831-1.0084939.json
- JSON-LD: 831-1.0084939-ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0084939-rdf.xml
- RDF/JSON: 831-1.0084939-rdf.json
- Turtle: 831-1.0084939-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 831-1.0084939-rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 831-1.0084939-source.json
- Full Text
- 831-1.0084939-fulltext.txt
- Citation
- 831-1.0084939.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
data-media="{[{embed.selectedMedia}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
https://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0084939/manifest