SEPARATION AXIOMS AND MINIMAL TOPOLOGIES by Saw-Ker Liaw B.Sc, Nanyang University, Singapore, 1967 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS i n the Department of MATHEMATICS We accept t h i s thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 1971 In presenting th i s thes is in pa r t i a l fu l f i lment of the requirements fo r an advanced degree at the Un ivers i ty of B r i t i s h Columbia, I agree that the L ibrary sha l l make i t f r ee l y ava i l ab le for reference and study. I fu r ther agree that permission for extensive copying of th i s thes i s fo r scho lar ly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representat ives. It is understood that copying or pub l i ca t ion of th i s thes i s f o r f inanc ia l gain sha l l not be allowed without my wr i t ten permission. Department of HATH E MhHC £ The Univers i ty of B r i t i s h Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Abstract A hierarchy of separation axioms can be obtained by considering which axiom implies another. This thesis studies the properties of some separation axioms between T Q and and investigates where each of the axioms belongs i n this hierarchy. The behaviours of the axioms under strengthenings of topologies and cartesian products are considered. Given a set X, the family of a l l topologies defined on X i s a complete l a t t i c e . A study of topologies which are minimal i n th i s l a t t i c e with respect to a ce r t a i n separation axiom i s made. We consider c e r t a i n such minimal spaces, obtain some characterizations and study some of t h e i r properties. Acknowledgement I am greatly indebted to Professor T. Cramer, without whose guidance and supervision the w r i t i n g of t h i s thesis would have been impossible. Thanks are also due to Professor A. Adler f o r reading the thesis and for his valuable comments and suggestions. The f i n a n c i a l support of the University of B r i t i s h Columbia and the National Research Council of Canada i s g r a t e f u l l y acknowledged. I would also l i k e to take t h i s opportunity to express my thanks to Mrs. Y.S. Chia Choo for typing this thesis. Table of Contents Page Introduction Chapter I Separation Axioms Between T Q and T §1. Introduction 1 §2. Separation Axioms Between T D and T-^ 1 §3. Relations of the Axioms 6 Chapter I I Properties of the Separation Axioms §1. Introduction 10 §2. Strengthening of Topologies 10 §3. Product Spaces 16 Chapter I I I Minimal Topologies §1. Introduction 21 §2. Minimal T Q and Minimal Tp Spaces 22 §3. Minimal T x Spaces 28 §4. Minimal Regular Spaces 28 §5. Minimal Hausdorff Spaces 33 §6. A Characterization of Order Topologies by Minimal T D Topologies 36 Bibliography 43 \ Introduction We s h a l l say that a separation axiom implies another i f every topological space which s a t i s f i e s the f i r s t axiom also s a t i s f i e s the second. Separation axioms between T c and T]_, that i s , separation axioms which imply T Q and are implied by T^, were f i r s t studied extensively by A u l l and Thron [1]. They introduced a hierarchy of separation axioms between T D and T l f namely T U D, T D, T ( Y ) , T p, T y, T Y S, T D D and T F F, gave characterizations of them, and studied t h e i r properties. Later Robinson and Wu [10] defined T^ m\ strong T Q and strong T D spaces. The f i r s t chapter of t h i s thesis i s devoted to a survey of these separation axioms. Their r e l a t i v e positions are studied, and examples are given. We introduce a new axiom, namely a T^jlp space. At the end of the chapter we obtain a diagram which shows the positions of these axioms. In the f i r s t part of chapter I I we s h a l l study the behaviours of the separation axioms under a strengthening of the topology, following the pattern of Park [9]. I t w i l l be found that with the exceptions of T ( Y ) , strong T Q and strong Tp, our axioms are preserved when the topology i s strengthened. Product spaces of a family of T D or ( m a cardinal) spaces are considered i n the second part of t h i s chapter, as Robinson and Wu did i n [10]. The major resu l t w i l l be that i t i s not possible to define a separation axiom between T ^ and T-^ which i s preserved under ar b i t r a r y products. Chapter I I I i s devoted to the study of minimal topologies on a set. Given a set X, the family of a l l topologies defined on X i s a - 2 -complete l a t t i c e . We s h a l l consider topologies i n t h i s l a t t i c e which are minimal with respect to a certain topological property. Minimal T Q , minimal TQ, minimal Tp minimal T2 and minimal regular spaces are considered. Characterizations of minimal T Q and minimal spaces are obtained by Larson [ 6 ] , while that of minimal regular spaces i s obtained by B e r r i and Sorgenfrey [3]. In the l a s t section we produce a characterization of order topologies on a set by means of minimal T Q topologies by Thron and Zimmerman [11]. Terminology and Notation The terminology and notation used i n th i s thesis follow those of Kelley [5]. In chapter I I I , where results on f i l t e r bases are used, one may refer to Bourbaki [4], A mention of the following terminologies i s i n order : (1) A set i s said to be degenerate i f f i t consists of at most one element. (2) For the closure of a point x, or more pre c i s e l y , of the set {x}, we s h a l l write {x:}. For the associated derived set we s h a l l write {x}' . CHAPTER I SEPARATION AXIOMS BETWEEN T Q AND T1 1. Introduction In t h i s chapter we s h a l l describe various separation axioms intermediate i n strength between T D and T^. Emphasis w i l l be given on those not included i n [1], We s h a l l describe the axioms, and for those not found i n [1] examples and characterizations w i l l be given. The reader i s referred to [1] and [7] fo r examples and equivalent forms for separation axioms introduced i n [1]. I t w i l l be observed that a l l the axioms can be described i n terms of the behaviour of derived sets of points. 2. Separation Axioms Between T D and T^ To characterize separation axioms between T Q and T-^ i t i s convenient to introduce the concept of weak separation i n a topological space. D e f i n i t i o n 2.1 A set A i n a topological space (X,T) i s said to be weakly separated from another set B i f f there exists an open set G 3 A such that G H B = <j>. We s h a l l write A |— B i n t h i s case. When A = {x} or B = {y}, we write x |— B and A I — y instead of {x} |— B and A |— {y}> respectively. The following axioms are introduced by A u l l and Thron i n [1] : - 2 -D e f i n i t i o n 2.2. A topological space (X,T) i s c a l l e d a (a) Ty D-space i f f for every x e X, {x}' i s the union of d i s j o i n t closed sets ; (b) Tp-space i f f for every x e X, {x} 1 i s a closed set ; (c) Tp D-space i f f i t i s T D and i n addition for a l l x, y e X, x ^ y, we have {x}' f l {y}' = <|>; (d) Tp-space i f f given any point x and any f i n i t e set F such that x i F, either x |— F or F I — x ; (e) Tpp-space i f f given two a r b i t r a r y f i n i t e sets F-^ and F 2 with H F 2 = <J>, either F ; L I — F 2 or F 2 | — ; (f) Ty-space i f f for a l l x, y e X, x ^ y, fx} (\ {y} i s degenerate; (g) Tyg-space i f f for a l l x, y e X, x f y, fx) n ( y l i s either <{> or {x} or {y} ; and (h) T(Y)-space i f f for every x e X {x}' i s the union of d i s j o i n t point closures. The following three separation axioms are due to Robinson and Wu [10] : D e f i n i t i o n 2.3. Let m be an i n f i n i t e cardinal. A topological space (X, T) i s c a l l e d a T ^ space i f f f o r every x e X, {x}=F fY( t\ {0 ±: i e I}) where F i s closed, each 0^ i s open, and card (I) = m. - 3 -D e f i n i t i o n 2.4. A topological space (X,T) i s c a l l e d a strong T D space i f f f o r each x e X, {x}' i s either empty or i s a union of a f i n i t e family of non-empty closed sets, such that the i n t e r s e c t i o n of th i s family i s empty. D e f i n i t i o n 2.5. A topological space (X,T) i s c a l l e d a strong T Q space i f f for each x e X, {x}' i s either empty or a union of non-empty closed sets, such that the i n t e r s e c t i o n of th i s family i s empty and at least one of the non-empty members i s compact. In view of the fact that i n a space {x}' = <J> for every x and that i n a T Q space {x}' i s the union of closed sets, i t i s immediate that strong T D and strong T Q l i e between T Q and T-^ . The following theorem shows that t h i s i s also true for T^m^ spaces. Theorem 2.1. The following are equivalent.: (a) (X,T) i s a T ( m> space ; (b) For each x e X, {x}' i s the union of m closed sets , i . e . , {x} 1 = U {C^ : i £ 1} where each Cj_ i s closed and card (I) = = m ; and (c) For each A C X such that card A <_ m, A' i s the union of m closed sets. Proof (a) => (b) For x e X, i f {x} = F n ( H {0± : i e 1} ) , then - 4 -{x}» = {x} - {x} = - (F n ( H {0 ± : i e 1} )) = ( {x} - F) U ( U { {x} - 0 ± : i e I } ) = U { {x} - 0 ± : i e I } since {x} C F, where card (I) = m. Hence {x}' i s the union of m closed sets. (b) => (c) Suppose A = {x^ : i E 1} where card I <_ m. Denote by C the set of w-limit points of A, i . e . , C = {x E X : every neighborhood of x contains i n f i n i t e l y many points of A} . Then C i s closed, and A' = C U ( U { {x ±}' : i e I } ) because A' contains the r i g h t hand side and i f x E A' i s not an w-limit point, then x E {x^}' for some x^ E A. Now by (b) each {x^}' i s the union of m closed sets and since card I <_ m, A' i s the union of m closed sets. (c) => (b) obvious. - 5 - r (b) =>(a) I f {x} 1 = U {F± : i e 1} where each F ± i s closed and card I = m, then {x} = {3D - {x}' = fx} - U {F ± : i e 1} = {x} n (X - F ± : i e 1} Hence (X,T) i s a space. Corollary. (a) Each T v '-space i s a T Q space. (b) Each Tp space i s a space for any m. (c) Each T_ space i s a T^m^ space f o r some m. A combination of and TK ' y i e l d s the following separation axiom. D e f i n i t i o n 2.6. Let m be an i n f i n i t e c a r d i n a l . A topological space (X,T) i s ca l l e d a T^m^ space i f f for every x e X, {x}' i s the union of m d i s j o i n t closed sets. From the d e f i n i t i o n i t i s immediate that every space i s a T^ UlP space for a l l m, and every T^j!j) space i s a space as w e l l as a T^m) space. Moreover every TJJ D space i s a T^ ™^ space for some cardinal m. Thus T ^ l i e s between T Q and T1 . - 6 -3. Relations of the Axioms The following diagram i s obtained by A u l l and Thron i n [1]. In t h i s diagram T a —> Tg means that every T a space i s a Tg-space. FF -> T DD ,YS -> T D -> Ty > T F > T(Y) >'T1 UD — > T o We s h a l l now attempt to place the T ^ and T^m^ spaces into t h i s chart and show that they are new axioms intermediate i n strength between T Q and T-^ • By v i r t u e of Corollary to Theorem 2.1 and the remark following D e f i n i t i o n 2.6 we have FF -> T DD YS -> T y > T p -> Tr T(m) UD T ( m ) -> T(r) > T UD -> T, We introduce some examples. Example 1. X = r e a l numbers. closed sets : <J>, X and [a, 0 0), where a e X. - 7 Example 2. X = r e a l numbers closed sets : <J>, X and {x} for x ^ 0 plus f i n i t e unions of these sets. Example 3. X = integers closed sets : X and {n}, n / 0 plus f i n i t e unions of these sets. The reader i s referred to [7] for detailed description of these examples. Theorem 3.1. T ^ and T U D are unrelated. Proof : (1) T ^ ±> T U D : Example 1 i s a T^m) space where m = c, but not a Ty D space. (2) T U D T ^ : Example 2 i s a T U D space but not a T ^ space. Theorem 3.2. T ^ and T(Y) are unrelated. Proof : (1) T ( m ) f> T(Y) : Theorem 3.1 Proof (1). (2) T(Y) i> T ^ : Example 2 i s a T(Y) space but not a T ( t^ space. - 8 -For T^Q) we have the following theorem Theorem 3.3. (a) T Q j» T^m). (b) T<J> TD. (c) T(Y) T<g>. Proof : (a) Example 1 i s a T Q space which i s not a space for any m. (b) Example 2 i s a space but not a T^ space. (c) Example 2 i s a T(Y) space which i s not a space. For strong Tp and strong T Q spaces we can make the following observations. Theorem 3.4. (a) Every strong Tp space i s a T D space. (b) Every strong T D space i s a T 0 space. Proof : This follows from the d e f i n i t i o n s . Example 4. X = {a,b}. T = U, {a}, X} . This i s a Tpp space, because {x} 1 = <J> for a l l but at most one x e X (cf. [1] Theorem 3.3), and also a TJ>D space because {x}' - 9 -i s closed for every x e X and for x f y, {x}' (\ {y}' = <j>. However, i t i s not a strong T D nor a strong T Q space since {a}' = {b} cannot be expressed as the union of a family of non-empty closed sets whose inte r s e c t i o n i s empty. We conclude t h i s section by the following chart : CHAPTER I I PROPERTIES OF THE SEPARATION-AXIOMS 1. Introduction In t h i s chapter an attempt i s made to investigate various properties of the separation axioms we have introduced. Properties l i k e whether a separation axiom i s preserved under strengthening of the topology or under product are considered. 2. Strengthening of Topologies I t i s known that the property of being T Q or T^ i s preserved under strengthening of the topology. In t h i s section we s h a l l study the axioms between T Q and T-^ . I t w i l l be found that the same i s true f o r most of our axioms. The following lemma, which follows d i r e c t l y from the d e f i n i t i o n , w i l l be useful. In t h i s lemma and throughout the remainder of th i s section, (X,T^) w i l l denote a strengthening of a topological space (X,T), where T and T-, are the two families of closed sets. Lemma 2.1. (a) (b) Let {x}, {x}' and {x}^ , {x}^ be the closures and derived sets of the point x i n T and respectively. Then {X} 1<1 {x} and {x}^ cZ {x}' . Suppose = T U {A a} where A a i s a closed set i n Tj_ for each a . Then i f x I U A a , then {x} = {x}p {x}' = {x}[ . - 11 -Proof : (a) i s clear since we have more closed sets i n than i n T. (b) since x i U Ag , the closed sets i n containing x are precisely those i n T containing x, and the equality follows. Theorem 2.2. I f (X,T) i s a T^ space, then so i s (X, -^), Proof : Let x be an a r b i t r a r y point i n X. We s h a l l show that {x}^ i s the union of d i s j o i n t closed sets i n . Since (X,T) i s T ^ , {x}' = = U C a where C a e T for each a and C a H C a, = <{> i f a f a' . Now by Lemma 2.1 (a), {x}^ {x} , hence {x}^ H {x}' = { x } 1 n ( u c a ) - u ( { x ^ n c a ) where the l a s t i n c l u s i o n follows from the fact that each {x}^ H C a i s a subset of {x}^ not containing x. Since ( Vx}^ n C a) n ( {x}^ n c a i ) = <(> i f a 4 a' ,{x}^ i s the union of d i s j o i n t closed sets. Therefore (X,^) i s a T U D space. Theorem 2.3. I f (X,T) i s a T^ space, so i s (X,T^) - 12 -Proof : We have seen i n the Proof of Theorem 2.2. that the equality {x}^ = .{1E>1 n {x}' holds for every x e X. Thus i f (X,T) i s T D, then {x}' i s closed i n T and so {x}^ i s closed i n . Hence (X,T^) i s also T^ . Theorem 2.4. T(Y) i s not preserved under the strengthening of the topology. Proof : Let X = {0, 1, 2, 3,•••} T = {$} U { {n, n+1, n+2, • •'•} : n = 0, 1, • •'•} Then (X,T) i s a T(Y) space because for each n, {n}' = {n+1, n+2, •••} Now l e t T± = T U { {n, n+2, n+4, • •'•} : n = 0,2, • •'•} Then (X,!^) i s a strengthening of (X,T) but (X,^) i s not a T(Y) space since for each n {2n - 1}[ = {2n - 1} (\ {2n - 1}' = {2n - 1, 2n, 2n + 1,•••} (\ {2n, 2n + 1,•••} = {2n, 2n + !,•••} - 13 -cannot be written as a union of d i s j o i n t point closures. Theorem 2.5. I f (X,T) i s a T p space, so i s (X.T^). Proof : A space i s a T F space i f f for every x e X, y e {x}* implies {y}' = <(.. (Cf. [1] Theorem 3.2). Now i f y e {x}^ , then y E {X} 1 and hence {y} 1 = <j>. But {y}[<r.{y>' • Thus {y}^ = <|>. Theorem 2.6. I f (X,T) i s a ' T y space, so i s ( X , ^ ) . Proof : We have, for x, y E X, x f y, n { y ) 1 c {x} n {y} . Since (X,T) i s T y , {x} n {y} i s degenerate, so that {x} (\ { y ^ i s also degenerate. Theorem 2.7. I f (X,T) i s a T y g space, so i s ( X , ^ ) . Proof : For x, y E X, x ^ y, since {x} f\ {y} i s either <)>, {x} , or {y} , the same holds for fx}^ H ^ ^ 1 ' Theorem 2.8. I f (X,T) i s a Tp F space, so i s (X,T^). Proof : (X,T) i s T p F i f f {x}* = <(> fo r a l l but at most one x E X (cf. [1] Theorem 3.3). Since {x},' C (x}' , the same i s true for {x}' . - 14 -Theorem 2.9. I f (X,T) i s a T D D space, so i s ( X , ^ ) . Proof : Since (X,T) i s T D , by Theorem 2.3 (X .Tp i s also T D Now for x, y e X, x ^ y , {x}' (\ {y}' = <|>, hence {x}^ fV {y}^ = (j>. Thus (X,^) i s also T D D . Theorem 2.10. I f (X,T) i s a T ^ space, so i s (X.T^) Proof : Let x e X. Then {x}' = U {C ± : i e 1} where each e T and card I = m. But {x}| = {3E>1 n {x}' = H ( U C ±) = u ( n c ± ) where {x}]^ n C± e Tj_ . Hence (X,^) i s also T ^ , Theorem 2.11. I f (X,T) i s a T ^ space, so i s (X,^) Proof : Since (X,T) i s T^ m\ for each x e X {x} 1 = U C± , i e I - 15 -where each £ T, card I = m and Cj H C k = <j> i f j ^ k. Hence {*}[ = {x} x H {x}' = n ( u c ±) = u ( rax n Cj,) where the family { {x}-^ H Cjj^ } i s d i s j o i n t . Hence (X,^) i s a T ^ space. Theorem 2.12. Strong Tp i s not preserved under the strengthening of the topology. Proof : Consider the example : X = {a, b, c} T = U , {a}, {a,b}, {a,c}, X} . Here {a}' = {b,c} = {b} U {c} {b}« = (J> {c}' = <j> Hence (X,T) i s a strong Tjj space. Now l e t T-y = {<{>, {a}, {b}, {a,b}, {a,c}, X}. Then (X,T^) i s not a strong Tp space because {a}| = {c}. Theorem 2.13. the topology. Strong T Q i s not preserved under the strengthening of - 16 -Proof : In the example i n the proof of Theorem 2.12, (X,T) i s a strong T Q space but (X ,T^) i s not. 3. Product Spaces An i n t e r e s t i n g question concerning the separation axioms i s whether they are preserved under a r b i t r a r y products. The product space of a family of T Q (or Tj) spaces i s again T Q (or T-^. In t h i s (m) section we s h a l l consider products of TJJ and T spaces, m a ca r d i n a l . Theorem 3.1. Let { (.X±,T/) : i = 1, 2, • • • ,n} be a f i n i t e family of T D n spaces. Then II X. i s also a Tjj space. i = l Proof : A space (X,T) i s a T D space i f f for every x e X, {x} = G H C , where G i s an open set and C i s a closed set i n X (cf. [ 1 ] Theorem 3 . 1 ) . n Now take x = {x^, x 2, • ,*,x n} e II X^ . Then each {x^} = G.^ H , where G^ and are open and closed respectively i n X^ . Hence N -1 {x} = n P. ( G ± n c.j) i = l N -1 -1 = n ( P / ( G . ) n P / ( c . ) ) i = l N -1 N -1 = n p. (G.) n n p/cc.) i = l 1 i = l 1 - 17 -Thus {x} i s the in t e r s e c t i o n of an open set with a closed set. Hence n II X. i s also T D . i = l The following theorem shows that Tp i s not preserved under a r b i t r a r y products. Theorem 3.2. Let {X^ : i e 1} be an i n f i n i t e family of TQ spaces, where each X^ i s not T-^ . Then II X^ i s not a T D space. i e l Proof : For every i e l , since X^ i s not T-^ , there i s a point otjL e X^ such that {a^} 1 ^ <j> . Let a = {a^ : i e 1} e n X^ , and i e l l e t Y = II {cT.} . Let {a}' be the derived set of a i n the subspace i e l 1 Y. We s h a l l show that {a}^ i s not closed i n Y. To t h i s end we f i r s t observe that i f x e Y - {a} and 0 i s a basic open neighborhood of x, then p^(x) e {cT^ } implies that e p^(0) for every i . Hence x e {a}y . Thus we have {a}^ = Y - {a} . I t therefore s u f f i c e s to show that Y - {a} i s not closed ( i n Y). We observe that i f 0 i s a basic open neighborhood of a i n Y, then 0 = Y n TKC^ : i e 1} where each (L i s an open neighborhood of e X^ and 0^ f X^ for only a f i n i t e number of i e l . Since I i s i n f i n i t e , there exists a non-empty subset I' d I such that 0^ = X^ for a l l i e l ' . Since we have {of.} - {a} ^ <j> for a l l i e l , we can choose a point 3 e Y - 18 -as follows a± i f i e I - I* {a ±} - {a} i f i e l 1 Then 3 = {$^ : i e 1} e 0. This means that every open neighborhood of a i n Y contains points of Y - {a} . Thus Y - {a} i s not closed i n Y. We therefore have proved that the subspace Y of II X. i s i e l not a TJJ space. Since the property of being T D i s hereditary, II X^ i e l i s not a Tp space. Theorem 3.3. Let (X,T) be a Tp space. Then a l l powers (that i s , products of X by i t s e l f ) of X are T D spaces i f f (X,T) i s T^ . Proof : This follows from Theorem 3.2. Theorem 3.4. A product of m spaces i s again a space. Proof : Let II X^ be a product of the x^ m^ spaces X^ , where i e l card (I) = m. Let x = {x. : i e 1} be an ar b i t r a r y point i n II X. i e l Then for every i e l , {x.} = G. m (\ F. where F. i s closed i n X. X X y III 1 X X and _ i s an int e r s e c t i o n of m open sets i n X. . Thus x y in x - 19 -{x} = H { p " 1 ^ ) : i e 1} -. n'^I 1< Gi,m n V : 1 e I } = H ( p ^ C G i ^ ) : i e 1} H H {p~ 1(F i) : i e 1} Now by the continuity of p^ , each p^(G^ m ) i s the int e r s e c t i o n of m open sets i n irX^ , and also H (p^CF^) : i e 1} i s closed i n irX^ . Since card (I) = m, we have expressed {x} as the interse c t i o n of a (m) closed set with m open sets. Thus TTX^ i s T . Theorem 3.5. Let {X^ : i E 1} be a family of spaces none of which i s T-^ , and l e t card (I) = n. Then T\X± i s a T ^ space i f f n < m. (m) Proof : . I f n <_ m, then by Theorem 3.4, irX^ i s again a x space. I f n > m, then by an analogous argument as i n that used i n the fro) proof of Theorem 3.2, TTX^ i s not a T space. Theorem ,3.6. There does not exi s t a separation axiom between a n c j T-^ which i s inherited by a r b i t r a r y products. Proof : Let T a be a separation axiom between and T-^ . F i x an i n f i n i t e cardinal m, and l e t {X^ : i E 1} be a family of T a spaces, none of which i s T^ and suppose card (I) = n > m. Now each X^ i s a - 20 -T space, so by Theorem 3.5 irX^ cannot be a T space since n > m. Therefore irX. i s not a T„ space. CHAPTER I I I Minimal Topologies 1. Introduction Given a set X, the family of a l l topologies defined on X i s a complete l a t t i c e . Of great i n t e r e s t are topologies which are minimal i n t h i s l a t t i c e with respect to a certain topological property, i n the sense of the following d e f i n i t i o n . D e f i n i t i o n 1.1. Let P be a topological property. A topology T defined on a set X i s c a l l e d a minimal P space i f f T has property P and every s t r i c t l y weaker topology on X does not have property P. Thus i f P stands for T Q, T D, T-^ , T 2, regular, completely regular, normal or l o c a l l y compact space, the topology T w i l l be ca l l e d a minimal T Q , minimal T D , minimal T 2 , minimal regular, minimal completely regular, minimal normal or minimal l o c a l l y compact topology accordingly. I t i s the purpose of t h i s chapter to investigate some of these minimal topologies, obtain t h e i r characterizations and ar r i v e at some of t h e i r properties. - 22 -2. Minimal T Q and Minimal Tp Spaces For the characterizations of minimal T 0 and minimal T D spaces the following Lemmas w i l l be useful. Lemma 2.1. Let (X,T) be a T Q (Tp) space and l e t B be an open subset of X. Let T(B) = {G e T : G C B or B c G} . Then (X,T(B)) i s a T Q (T D) space. Proof : We f i r s t show that T(B) i s indeed a topology. Since <J> c B and B d X, we have <|>, X E T(B). Now i f G-j_, G 2 e T(B), then either B e G^, B C. ^n w n ^ c n case B C H G2, or B contains one of the two sets i n which case G-^ f l G 2 C B . Hence G-^ H G 2 e T(B). F i n a l l y i f G a e T(B) for every a e A, then either every G a C B or B c G a for some a, so that U G a C. B or B C U GQ, whence U Gae T(B). aeA aeA aeA Now suppose T i s a T Q topology. To show that T(B) i s also T Q , l e t x, y e X, x ^ y and suppose that G e T , x £ G , y ^ G . We consider three cases. (1 ) I f x e B and y t B, then B i s an open set i n T(B) containing x but not y. S i m i l a r l y i f y e B and x $. B. - 23 -(2) I f x, y e B, then G H B i s an open set i n T(B) containing x but not y. (3) I f x, y i B, then G U B i s an open set i n T(B) containing x but not y. Thus (X,T(B)) i s also a T Q space. Suppose next (X,T) i s a T^ space. T Q prove that T(B) i s also T D, take a r b i t r a r y x e X, and consider , the derived set of x i n the topology T(B). Again we consider two cases. ( i ) I f x i B, then x e X - B which i s closed i n T(B). Thus {x}lCL X - B and so B C X - {x}' . Hence X - {x}' i s open, and so D a a {x}' i s closed i n T(B). a ( i i ) I f x E B, we can prove that i f y e B, y $ x, then y $. {x}' . B Indeed, i n th i s case B - {x} e T(B), y e B - {x}, but x I B - {x} . Hence {x}' (\ B = d> , which means that B C X - {x}' . Hence {x}' i s closed i n T(B). Lemma 2.2. In a topological space (X,T), the following are equivalent: (1) The open sets i n the topology are rested, i . e . , for A, B e T, either A C B or B CA. (2) The closed sets i n the topology are rested. (3) F i n i t e unions of point closures are point closures. - 24 -Proof : The equivalence of (1) and (2) i s clear. That (2) implies (3) i s also obvious, since the union of a f i n i t e number of point closures i s the largest one. To show that (3) implies (2), l e t C, D be two non-empty closed sets i n (X,T), and suppose C ^ D. Then either C - D <f> or D - C <J» must hold. Assume C - D ? <J>. Take y e D and choose x e C - D. Then by (3) fx} U {y"} = {¥} for some z e X. I t follows that z e fx} or z e {y}, i . e . , {¥} C {x} or {¥} C (y) • But {x} C fz} and {y} C {"zh Hence {x} = {z} or {y} = fz}. But {y} = {~z} i s impossible since this would imply x e {¥} = {y} C D , a contradiction because x i D. Therefore fx} = {z} and so y e {z} = fx} C C. We have thus proved that D C C. Si m i l a r l y i f D - C f <J>, then C a D. Hence (2) holds. The following Theorem gives a characterization of minimal T Q spaces. Theorem 2.3. A T Q topological space (X,T) i s minimal T Q i f f the family g = {X - fx} : x e X} U {x} i s a base for T and f i n i t e unions of point closures are point closures. Proof : ( >) Let A, B be open sets i n T. I f A ^ B , B cj/t A, then by Lemma 2.1, T(B) i s a T Q topology on X such that T(B) c T and A £ T(B). This contradicts the minimality of T. Thus either A C B or B C A. Hence by Lemma 2.2, f i n i t e unions of point closures are point closures. Now since T i s a nested family of open sets, the - 25 -subfamily {X - {x} : x e X} U {X} i s closed under f i n i t e intersections, and so i s a base for some topology on X. Clearly T ^ C T . Also T i s a T Q topology, because for x ^ y, either x i {y} or y i {xl since T i s T Q . By the minimality of T, we have = T. So 3 i s a base for T. (<C ) Let (X,T) be T Q where T i s nested and 3 i s a base for T. Suppose T*d T, where T* i s a T Q topology. Suppose there i s a point x e X such that {x} ^ {x:}* , where fx}* i s the closure of {x} i n T* . Since Vx} <C {x}* , we can choose a point y e {JC}* , y i {x} . Since T i s nested, we must have {x} C { y l . But {y} C {y}* , hence x e {x} C {y}* . Thus x e {y}* and y e {x}* , which i s impossible i n a T Q space. Hence for every x e X, {x} = {xT}* . Since 3 = (X - {x} : x e X} U {X} i s a base f o r T, we must have T = T* . Thus T i s minimal T Q . Theorem 2.4. A T D topological space (X,T) i s minimal T D i f f f i n i t e unions of point closures are point closures. Proof : ( y) By a proof i d e n t i c a l to the one i n Theorem 2.3. ( < — ) Suppose (X,T) i s T D and T i s nested. Let T*C T, where T* i s a T D space. We s h a l l show that T* = T. Since a T D space i s a T Q space, we can apply the argument i n Theorem 2.3 and a r r i v e at the conclusion that fx} = fx}* , {x}1 = {x}'* for every x e X. Now assume that T* ^ T. Then there i s a set C C X closed i n T but not - 26 -closed i n T* . I f C* denotes the closure of C i n T*, then C C c * . ft; But T* i s T Q , therefore C* - C consists of exactly one point x. Since there does not e x i s t a closed set i n T* smaller than C* which contains x, we have C* = {x}* = C U {x} = {x}'* U {x} . Thus i t follows that C = {x}'* because x ^ C, x ^ { x } ' * . But t h i s contradicts the fact that C i s not closed i n T* . Thus we must have T* = T and T i s minimal T^ . The following two examples show that the two conditions i n Theorem 2.3 cannot be relaxed and that they are independent of each other. Example 2.1. X = r e a l numbers T = {(-°°,x) : x e X} U {(-°°,x] : x e X} U {<t>,X}. (X,T) i s a T Q space i n which the open sets are nested, but i s not a minimal T Q space because, for example, the proper subfamily T 1 = = {(-°°,x) : x e X} U {<j>,X} i s a T Q topology on X. Example 2.2. X = {a,b,c} T = {<)>, {a}, {b}, {a,b}, X} . (X,T) i s a T Q space. Moreover, since {¥} = {a,c}, {b} = {b,c}, {c} = {c}, the complements of these sets are {b}, {a}, {a,b} which form a base for the topology T . However, the open sets are obviously not nested. - 27 -The next example shows that minimal T Q i s not hereditary. Example 2.3. X = r e a l numbers. T = {(-°°,x) : x e X} U {<}>,X} A = (-00,0] U (I,-) (X,T) i s a minimal T D space since the open sets are c l e a r l y nested and for every x e X, fx} = [x,«>) so that the family {X - fx} : x e X} i s precisely T i t s e l f . However, the subspace A i s not minimal T Q because although the open sets are again nested, the complements of point closures do not form a base. Indeed, we f i r s t observe that (-°°,0] i s open i n A and 0 e (-°°,0] . Now i f x e (-°°,0] , then 0 e [x,<») (\ A = = fx} H A = fx}^ and so 0 i A - {x}^ • 0 n t n e other hand, i f x e ( l , 0 0 ) , then A - fx}^<^: (-co»0] • Hence {A - fx}^ : x e A} i s not a base for the r e l a t i v e topology. For minimal T^ spaces we have the following r e s u l t . Theorem 2.5. Every subspace of a minimal Tp space i s again minimal Tp. Proof : Each subspace of a TQ space i s TQ. By the d e f i n i t i o n of r e l a t i v e topology the nestedness of open sets i s inherited. Hence by Theorem 2.4 and Lemma 2.2 the re s u l t follows. - 28 -3. Minimal T-^ spaces For minimal T-^ space we have the following neat theorem. Theorem 3.1. A topological space (X,T) i s minimal T-^ i f f the non-t r i v i a l closed sets are precisely the f i n i t e sets. Proof : Given any set X l e t T* = {A C X : X - A i s f i n i t e } U {<(>} . Then i t i s well-known that (X,T*) i s a T-^ space. Moreover, T* i s the weakest T-^ topology on X because i f T i s another T-^ topology on X, then a l l f i n i t e sets are closed i n T and so T*<Z T. I t follows that T i s a minimal T^ topology i f f T = T . The theorem follows. Corollary 3.2. Any subspace of a minimal T-^ space i s minimal T-^ . 4. Minimal Regular Spaces For subsequent discussion we s h a l l make use of the notion of a f i l t e r base. The reader i s referred to [4] for d e f i n i t i o n s and results concerning f i l t e r bases i n a topological space. For our present arguement we introduce some d e f i n i t i o n s . - 29 -D e f i n i t i o n 4.1. A f i l t e r base F on a set X i s said to be weaker than a f i l t e r base G on X i f f for each F e F, there exists some G e G such that G C F. D e f i n i t i o n 4.2. A f i l t e r base F on a set X i s said to be equivalent to a f i l t e r base G on X i f f F i s weaker than G and G i s weaker than F. I t i s readily checked that the r e l a t i o n of equivalence between f i l t e r s i s an equivalence r e l a t i o n . D e f i n i t i o n 4.3. A f i l t e r base F on a topological space (X,F) i s c a l l e d an open (closed) f i l t e r base i f f for every F e F, F i s an open (closed) set. D e f i n i t i o n 4.4. A f i l t e r base T on a topological space i s c a l l e d a regular f i l t e r base i f f i t i s open and i s equivalent to a closed f i l t e r base. D e f i n i t i o n 4.4 i s suggested by the following theorem. Theorem 4.1. In a regular topological space (X,T), the f i l t e r base qf open neighborhoods of a point i s regular. Proof : Let B(x) be the f i l t e r base of open neighborhoods of the point x and l e t C(x) be the f i l t e r base of closed neighborhoods of x. - 30 -Obviously for every C e C(x), there i s a B e B(x) such that B e C Since T i s regular, for every B e B(x), we can also f i n d C e C(x) such that C C B. Hence B(x) i s equivalent to C(x) and so i s regular. We s h a l l be interested i n the following conditions i n a topological space : (a) Every regular f i l t e r base which has a unique cluster point i s convergent to t h i s point. (3) Every regular f i l t e r base has a cluster point. Theorem 4.2. A regular space (X,T) i s minimal regular i f f (a) holds, Proof Necessity : Suppose $ i s a regular f i l t e r base which has the unique clus t e r point p, and assume that 3 does not converge to p. We s h a l l construct a topology on X which i s regular but s t r i c t l y weaker than T. For each x e X, l e t U(x) be the f i l t e r base of open neighbor-hoods of x. Define U'(x) = U(x) i f x i p {U U B : U e U(p), B e 8} i f x = p Under t h i s d e f i n i t i o n there i s defined on X a topology T' with U'(x) as an open neighborhood base at each x e X. Now since B does not converge to p, there i s a U e U(p) - B which does not contain any set - 31 -i n U'(p). Hence T* i s s t r i c t l y weaker than T. To show that T' i s regular, f i r s t i t i s clear that T' i s regular at each point x / p. At the point p, since B i s regular, B i s equivalent to some closed f i l t e r base C. Now i f p e U U B, where U E U(x), B e S, there exists closed sets V, C such that p e VcTlU, C e C, C C B, so that p e V U C Thus T' i s also regular at p. This shows that T i s not a minimal regular topology. Sufficiency : Suppose (X,T) i s regular and s a t i s f i e s (a). Let T 1 be a regular topology on X such that T'C T. For each x £ X, denote by U(x) and K'(x) the open neighborhood systems of x i n T and T 1 respectively. Since T' i s regular, the f i l t e r base U'(x) i s , by Theorem 4.1, T 1-regular. Moreover, x i s the only clu s t e r point of U'(x). Since T'C T, i t follows that U 1 (x) i s regular i n T and has x as i t s unique c l u s t e r point. By (a), U'(x) must converge to x i n T, so that by d e f i n i t i o n ( J ( x ) C U ' ( x ) . But T'C_T implies U ' ( x ) C U ( x ) . Thus U (x) = Li' (x) and we have T' = T. Hence T i s minimal regular. Lemma 4.3. I f the subspace A of the regular space (X,T) s a t i s f i e s (g), then A i s closed i n X. Proof : Suppose A ^ A and l e t p e A - A . Let U and 1/ be the open and closed neighborhood systems of p i n X, respectively ( V i s a neighborhood system since T i s regular). Let - 32 -B = {A H U : U e 0} C = ' {A n V : V e V} Then B i s an open f i l t e r base i n A, while C i s a closed f i l t e r base i n A. Moreover, since T i s regular, U i s equivalent to f, and hence B i s equivalent to C. Thus B i s a regular f i l t e r base on A. But B i s also a f i l t e r base on X, and U i s weaker than B. Since p i s the only cluster point of U i n X, i t i s also the only cluster point of 8 i n X. This means that, since p i X, g has no cluster point i n X, which contradicts (g). Hence A must be closed. Theorem 4.4. In a regular space, (a) implies (g). Proof : Let B be a regular f i l t e r base on a regular space (X,T). Assume B has no cluster point. Let C be a closed f i l t e r base equivalent to B. F i x p e X. Let U, V be the open and closed neighborhood systems of p respectively. Then U and V are equivalent, by Theorem 4.1. Let F = {B U U : B e 8, U e U} and G = {C U V : C e C, V e I/}. Then F i s an open f i l t e r base, and G i s a closed f i l t e r base on X. Moreover, F i s equivalent to G, which follows from the equivalences of B to C and U to (/. Thus F i s regular. Now p i s a cluster point of F, and since B has no clus t e r point, F has no cluster point other than p. However, F does not converge to p. This contradiction to (a) shows that (a) implies (g). - 33 -Theorem 4.5. A minimal regular subspace of a regular space i s closed. Proof : By Theorem 4.2, a minimal regular subspace of a topological space s a t i s f i e s (a). By Theorem 4.4, i t also s a t i s f i e s (g), so that by v i r t u e of Lemma 4.3 i t i s closed. Corollary 4.6. Minimal r e g u l a r i t y i s not hereditary. 5. Minimal Hausdorff Spaces For the characterization of minimal Hausdorff spaces we consider the following two properties of a topological space : (1) Every open f i l t e r base has a clus t e r point. (2) Every open f i l t e r base which has a unique cluster point converges to t h i s point. Theorem 5.1. In a Hausdorff space, (2) implies (1). Proof : Suppose (1) does not hold, and l e t B be an open f i l t e r base which has no cluster point. Fix p e X. Let U be the open neighborhood system of p. Define G = {V U B | V e U and B e B} - 34 -Then G i s an open f i l t e r base and p i s i t s only cluster point. By (2), G converges to p .'"But 8 i s weaker than B, so B also converges to p. But t h i s contradicts the assumption that 8 has no c l u s t e r point. Hence (1) holds. Theorem 5.2. A Hausdorff space (X,T) i s minimal Hausdorff i f f (2) holds i n T. Proof : Necessity : Let (X,T) be Hausdorff and suppose that (2) does not hold, so that there exists an open f i l t e r base 8 having the unique cl u s t e r point p but 8 does not converge to p. For each x e X, l e t U(x) denote the open neighborhood system of x. Define f o r every x a family of subsets of X as follows : U'(x) = U(x) i f x ^ p, and U'(p) = {U U B : U e U(p), B e B}. With t h i s d e f i n i t i o n there exists a topology T 1 on X with U'(x) as an open base at each x. That T'O T i s c l e a r . Moreover since 8 does not converge to p, there i s U e U(p) - 8 and U does not contain any set i n U'(p). Thus Tf<~T. We now show that T' i s Hausdorff. Indeed, for x, y e X, x ^ y, i f x ^ P> y ^ P» then the existence of d i s j o i n t open neighborhoods i s guaranteed. For x f p, by Hausdorffness of T there are A e U(p), D e U(x) such that A H D = <|>. Since p i s the only clus t e r point of 8, x cannot be a c l u s t e r point and so there i s E e U(x), B E 8 such that E H B = <f). I t follows that D H E e U (x), A U B e U'(p) and (A u B ) H (D n E) = <\>. Thus T' i s Hausdorff and T i s not minimal Hausdorff. - 35 -Sufficiency : Let (X,T) be Hausdorff s a t i s f y i n g (2) and l e t T' be a Hausdorff topology on X with T'C T. Let x e X, and l e t U(x) and U'(x) be the open neighborhood systems of x i n T and T' respectively. Then U'(x)c~. M(x). The open f i l t e r base U'(x) has x as i t s only clus t e r point, because T' i s Hausdorff. Since T'<^ T, x i s the only c l u s t e r point of U'(x) i n (X,T). By (2), U'(x) converges to x. Thus U(x)<C U'(x). Thus the two topologies T and T' are i d e n t i c a l , and so T i s minimal Hausdorff. Theorem 5.3. Let X be a subspace of the Hausdorff space (Y,T). I f X s a t i s f i e s (1), then X i s closed i n Y. Proof : I f X X , l e t p e X - X . Let U be the open neighborhood system of p i n Y. Then B = {X H U : U e U} i s an open f i l t e r base on X. Moreover, as a f i l t e r base on Y, B i s stronger than U and since p i s the only cluster point of U, B cannot have any other cluster point than p i n Y. This means that B has no clust e r point i n X, since p i X. But th i s contradicts the hypothesis that X s a t i s f i e s (1). That the property of being minimal Hausdorff i s not hereditary i s shown by the following theorem. Theorem 5.4. A minimal Hausdorff subspace X of a Hausdorff space (Y,T) i s closed. - 36 -Proof : Since X i s minimal Hausdorff, Theorems 5.1 and 5.2 t e l l us that X s a t i s f i e s property (1). Theorem 5.3 then concludes that X i s closed. Theorem 5.5. I f a subspace of a minimal Hausdorff space i s both open and closed, then i t i s minimal Hausdorff. Proof : Let A be an open and closed subset of the minimal Hausdorff space (X,T). Let B be an open f i l t e r base on A with only one cluster point p e A. Since A i s open i n X, B i s also an open f i l t e r base on X. Since A i s also closed, the closure of B e B i n A i s closed i n X, and hence p i s the only clus t e r point of B on X. But now X i s minimal Hausdorff, hence B converges to p on X, by Theorem 5.2. Since p e A, B also converges to p on A. Again invoking Theorem 5.2, A i s minimal Hausdorff. 6. A Characterization of Order Topologies by Minimal T Q Topologies In t h i s section we s h a l l give a characterization of order topologies on a set X by means of minimal T Q topologies on X. We r e c a l l that a topology T on X i s an order topology on X i f f there exists a l i n e a r order <_ on X such that the sets of the forms {y : y < x} and {y : x < y}, where x e X, form a subbase for T, where a < b means that a <_ b but a ^ b. We prove that a topology T on a set X - 37 -i s an order topology i f f (X,T) i s T-^ and T i s the least upper bound of two minimal topologies on X, i n the sense of the following d e f i n i t i o n . D e f i n i t i o n 6.1. A topology T on a set X i s the least upper bound of two topologies Ty and T"2 on X i f f T i s the smallest topology containing 7"-^ and T"2 . We s h a l l write T = V T 2 i n t h i s case. Lemma 6.1. I f and T 2 are topologies on X and and B 2 are bases for and 7"2 respectively, then B-^ u B 2 i s a subbase for T± V T 2 . Proof : I t i s clear that B-^ U B 2 i s a subbase for some topology, say T, on X. Also T^C. T and T 2 C T . Hence V T 2 C T . On the other hand any topology on X containing and T 2 must contain B-^ U B 2 and hence contains unions of f i n i t e intersections of members of B^ U B 2 , so that i t contains T. Thus T c T ^ V T 2 • D e f i n i t i o n 6.2. Let T be a topology on a set X. Define a r e l a t i o n £ j on X as follows a <_ j b i f f b e {a} I t i s immediate that <^ j as defined above i s r e f l e x i v e and t r a n s i t i v e . In a T Q space i t i s also anti-symmetric, as the following lemma shows. - 38 -Lemma 6.2. A topology order. Proof : I f T i s T Q a e {b}, so that a = b symmetric, and i f a ^ b Lemma 6.3. The topology T i s nested i f f any two elements are comparable, i . e . , for a, b e X , either a <_ j b or b <_ j a . Proof : I f T i s nested, then for a, b e X, either {ID C {b} or {b} C {a} , and so either a j i - j - b o r b <_ -j- a . Conversely, suppose the condition holds. Let A, B e T and assume A cji B. Choose a e A - B . Now for each x e B, x i fa} since B i s an open set containing x but not a. Thus a {_ j x and so x <_ j a. Therefore a e {xl and since a e A e T , we must have x e A. Hence B C. A and so T i s nested. Theorem 6.4. A topological space (X,T) i s minimal T Q i f f <_ j i s a li n e a r order and {{y : y < j x} : x e X} U {X} i s a base for T. Proof : I f T i s minimal T Q ,> then by Theorem 2.3 and Lemma 2.2 T i s nested and {X - fx} : x e X} U {X} i s a base for T. I t follows from Lemma 6.2 and Lemma 6.3 that <_ j i s a l i n e a r order. Moreover for each x e X, T on a set X i s T Q i f f <_ j i s a p a r t i a l and a< y b , b <_j a, then b e fa} and since T i s T Q . Conversely, i f <_ j i s a n t i -and b e {a} , then a i {b} . Hence T i s T D. - 39 -X - {x} = X - {y : y e' {x}} = X - {y : x <_ j y} = {y : y < j x} since <_ j i s l i n e a r . Thus {{y : y <j x} : x e X} U {X} i s a base for T. In the other d i r e c t i o n suppose <_ j i s l i n e a r and {{y : y < x} : : x e X} U {X} i s a base for T. Then by Lemma 6.3, T i s nested. Again, because <_j i s l i n e a r we have for each x e X, X - {JC} = {y :- y < j x} . Thus {X - {x} : x e X} U {x} i s a base for T and by Theorem 2.3 T i s a minimal T Q topology. Theorem 6.5. Given any set X, there exists a 1-1 conespondence between the set of a l l minimal T Q topologies on X and the set of a l l l i n e a r orders on X. Proof : Let M be the set of a l l minimal topologies on X, and l e t L be the set of a l l l i n e a r orders on X. Define <j> : M —> L by <J>(T) = f. j for each T e M . By Theorem 6.4 <_ j i s indeed a l i n e a r order on X, and so <J> i s a well-defined map from M to L. Also <j> i s 1-1 because i f T^, T j e M and <_ j = <_ j , then T-^ and T^ have bases {{y : y < x} : x e X} U {X} and {{y : y < _ x} : x e X} U {X} , ' l '2 respectively. Since the two basis are the same, = T 2 • - 40 -Now l e t < be a l i n e a r order on X. Let B = {{y : y < x) : : x e X} U {X} . For any x, z e X, {y : y < x} (\ {y : y < z} i s either {y : y < x} or {y : y < z}, since <_ i s l i n e a r . Thus B i s a base f o r some topology on X, say T. Let <_ j be the r e l a t i o n on X defined by T. We s h a l l show that <_ y = <_ . I f a <_ b and b e N e T then there i s a B e B such that b e B d N . I f B = X then a e B C N. I f B ± X then B = {y : y < c} for some c £ X. Then since a <^ b and b < c we have a < c and so a e B C N. This means that every open set containing b contains a. Hence b e {a} and a j b. On the other hand, i f a <^ j b but b < a, then we have b e {y : y < a} e T but a i {y : y < a}, so that b i (a} and th i s contradicts a <_ j b . Hence a <_ b since < i s a l i n e a r order. We have thus prove that <^ j = <^ . Hence by Theorem 6.4 T i s a minimal topology on X. Consequently <b(T) = <_ j = <_ and so (j> i s onto. The following theorem gives the main result of t h i s section. Theorem 6.6. A topology T on a set X i s an order topology i f f T i s T^ and T i s the least upper bound of two minimal T Q topologies. Proof : Let T be an order topology and l e t <^ be the associated l i n e a r order. Then the sets of the forms {y : y < x} and {y : x < y} form a subbase for T. Clearly T i s T-^ . Let = {{y : y < x} : x e X} U {X} - 41 -A N D B 9 = {{y : y > x} : x e X} u {X} . As i n the proof of Theorem 6.5, B-^ and B 2 a r e bases for topologies Ty and T 2 respectively which are minimal T Q on X, and we have <_ = <^ and <_ = <_""'" where a <_^~ b i f f b <_ a. By Lemma 6.1 7 1 ' 2 ~ " B-^ U B 2 i s a subbase for V T 2 . But as mentioned above B^ u B 2 i s also a subbase for T. Hence T = V T 2 i s the least upper bound of two minimal T Q topologies. Conversely, assume that T = T^ \/ T 2 where and 7"2 are minimal T Q and that T i s T-^ . Then we know that <_ T and <_ T are ' 1 ' 2 l i n e a r . We s h a l l show that < ^ = f . - r »i«e., a 1. T b i f f ^ ^ _ -r a . !l 2 '.1 '.2 For t h i s purpose suppose a <_ T b, a £. T b and a ^ b, and l e t G e T '.1 2 = V T 2 be such that b e G. Then there e x i s t G-^ e and G 2 e T 2 such that b e G-, H G 2 C G. Since a £ r b, b e {a}-r and so a E G-^ . 1 1 S i m i l a r l y a e G 2 . Thus a e G. This means that every open set i n T containing b also contains a, which i s impossible since T i s T-^ . Hence for a, b e X, a / b and a <^ T b, we have a j_ j b and since ' l 2 <_ i s l i n e a r , we must have b <_ y a . S i m i l a r l y b <^ j a, b / a ~'.2 2 2 implies a < _. b. Hence < T = < ^ . Now since T. and T„ are ~ ' l ~ ! l ~ 2 minimal T Q , by Theorem 6.4 they have bases B-L = {{y : y < T x} : x E X} U {X} - 42 -and B 9 = {{y : y > y x} : x e X} U {X} 1 1 respectively. By Lemma 6.1, B^ U B 2 i s a subbase for '/ T 2 = T . But since ^ i s l i n e a r , 8^ U B 2 i s the subbase for an order topology on X, which i n th i s case must therefore be T. Thus T i s an order topology. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. A u l l , C.E. and Thron, W.J., "Separation axioms between T Q and T^", Indag. Math. 24 (1962), 26-37. 2. B e r r i , M.P., "Minimal topological spaces", Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963), 97-105. 3. B e r r i , M.P. and Sorgenfrey, R.H., "Minimal regular spaces", Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1963), 454-458. 4. Bourbaki, N., "Elements of mathematics general topology", Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Mass. U.S.A. 5. Kelley, J.L., "General topology", D. Van Nostrand Co. Inc., Princeton, 1955. 6. Larson, R.E., "Minimal T D-spaces and minimal Tjy-spaces", P a c i f i c Journ. Math. 31 (1969), 451-458. 7. Mah, P.F., "On some separation axioms", M.A. Thesis, U.B.C. (1965). 8. Pahk, Ki-Hyun, "Note on the characterization of minimal T Q and T D spaces", Kyungpook Math. J. 8> (1968), 5-10. 9. Park, Young Sik, "The strengthening of topologies between T Q and T-L", Kyungpook Math. J. 8 (1968), 37-40. 10. Robinson, S.M. and Wu, Y.C., "A note on separation axioms weaker than T j " , J . Austral. Math. Soc. 9_ (1969), 233-236. 11. Thron, W.J. and Zimmerman, S.J., "A characterization of order topologies by means of minimal T Q topologies", Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Vol. 27 No. 1 (1971), 161-167.
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Separation axioms and minimal topologies
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Featured Collection
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Separation axioms and minimal topologies Liaw, Saw-Ker 1971
pdf
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | Separation axioms and minimal topologies |
Creator |
Liaw, Saw-Ker |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Date Issued | 1971 |
Description | A hierarchy of separation axioms can be obtained by considering which axiom implies another. This thesis studies the properties of some separation axioms between T₀ and T₁ and investigates where each of the axioms belongs in this hierarchy. The behaviours of the axioms under strengthenings of topologies and cartesian products are considered. Given a set X, the family of all topologies defined on X is a complete lattice. A study of topologies which are minimal in this lattice with respect to a certain separation axiom is made. We consider certain such minimal spaces, obtain some characterizations and study some of their properties. |
Subject |
Linera topological spaces |
Genre |
Thesis/Dissertation |
Type |
Text |
Language | eng |
Date Available | 2011-05-10 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
DOI | 10.14288/1.0080463 |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/34414 |
Degree |
Master of Arts - MA |
Program |
Mathematics |
Affiliation |
Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Department of |
Degree Grantor | University of British Columbia |
Campus |
UBCV |
Scholarly Level | Graduate |
AggregatedSourceRepository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- 831-UBC_1971_A8 L53.pdf [ 1.78MB ]
- Metadata
- JSON: 831-1.0080463.json
- JSON-LD: 831-1.0080463-ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0080463-rdf.xml
- RDF/JSON: 831-1.0080463-rdf.json
- Turtle: 831-1.0080463-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 831-1.0080463-rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 831-1.0080463-source.json
- Full Text
- 831-1.0080463-fulltext.txt
- Citation
- 831-1.0080463.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0080463/manifest