ADAMS OPERATIONS ON KO(X) © KSp(X) by JACQUES ALLARD B.Sc, Universite de Montreal, 1971 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE i n the Department of Mathematics We accept t h i s thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July, 1973 In presenting t h i s t h e s i s i n p a r t i a l f u l f i l m e n t of the requirements f o r an advanced degree at the U n i v e r s i t y of B r i t i s h Columbia, I agree that the L i b r a r y s h a l l make i t f r e e l y a v a i l a b l e f o r reference and study. I f u r t h e r agree that permission f o r extensive copying of t h i s t h e s i s f o r s c h o l a r l y purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by h i s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s . I t i s understood that copying or p u b l i c a t i o n of t h i s t h e s i s f o r f i n a n c i a l gain s h a l l not be allowed without my w r i t t e n permission. Department The U n i v e r s i t y of B r i t i s h Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada l i . Supervisor: U. Suter ABSTRACT Let KO(X) be the r e a l and KSP(X) be the quaternionic K-theory of a f i n i t e CW-complex X . The tensor product and the exterior powers of vector bundles induce on L(X) = KO(X) ® KSP(X) the structure of a -graded A-ring. In t h i s thesis i t i s shown, that the Adams operations ipk : L(X) + L(X) , k = l, 2, 3,..., which are associated to t h i s A-ring, are rin g homomorphisms and s a t i s f y the composition law ijjk o = \p^k = ijj^ o ipk t k,£ = 1, 2, 3,... F i n a l l y , the ring L(X) together with i t s ^-operations i s e x p l i c i t e l y determined for the quaternionic and complex projective" spaces. i i i . Acknowledgement The author i s pleased to acknowledge the very patient help and guidance of Dr. U l r i c h Suter during the preparation of t h i s thesis. He i s also thankful to Dr. Kee Lam for kindly reading the manuscript. i v . Table of Contents Page Introduction v. Chapter 1 §1.1. Definitions and preliminaries 1 §1.2. Main theorem 3 §1.3. A-semi-rings 4 §1.4. A-operations on V(X) 9 §1.5. Proof of the main theorem 16 §1.6. A natural transformation 16 §1.7. The reduced theory 17 Chapter 2. §2.1. Preliminaries 19 §2.2. A ring isomorphism 21 k k §2.3. Relation between <JJ and ip 24 Chapter 3 §3.1. Computation for HP n 27 §3.2. Computation for CP n 32 Bibliography 38 V. Introduction Let X be a f i n i t e connected CW-complex and l e t KO(X) , KU(X) and KSp(X) be respectively the r e a l , complex and quaternionic K-theory of X . This thesis i s concerned with the functor defined by L(X) = KO(X) © KSp(X) . Real and quaternionic vector bundles can. be viewed as complex vector bundles provided with some structure maps. This permits the d e f i n i t i o n of tensor product and exterior powers i n the category of re a l and quaternionic vector bundles, and, therefore, induces a structure of (Z2~graded) A-ring on L(X) . (A A-ring R i s a commutative ring with unit together with a set of maps A n : R -> R , n = 0, 1,..., having the formal properties of exterior powers). To any A-ring R , one can associate group homomorphisms k n tp : R -> R , k = 1, 2,..., given by universal polynomials i n A Our main theorem states that the homomorphisms tp associated to the A-ring L(X) (i) are ring homomorphisms ( i i ) s a t i s f y the r e l a t i o n <pN^ = = i|/ipk" k = 2., 2,.. Atiyah and T a l l [4] have given s u f f i c i e n t conditions on a A-ring i n order that i t s associated 's have properties ( i ) , ( i i ) . A A-ring s a t i s f y i n g those conditions i s cal l e d special A-ring. We prove that L(X) i s a special A-ring. Our proof i s based on the theorem that the representation ring of a compact Lie group i s a special A-ring. Adams [1] has introduced on the A-rings KO(X) and KU(X) the homomorphisms: i|£ : KO(X) -> KO(X) i|£ ; KU(X) -»• KU(X) The ip 's on L(X) are related to the Adams operations i n many ways. Let LU(X) = KU(X) « KU(X) be given the Z 2-graded A-ring structure induced by the A-ring structure of KU(X) (essentially, define (a,b) • (a',b') = (aa' + bb', ab' + a'b) , A n(a,0) = (A n(a),0) A n(0,b) = (0,A n(b)) for n odd , A n(0,b) = (A n(b),0) for n even). There i s a natural Z^-graded ring homomorphism U : L(X) -> LU(X) n k commuting with the A 's (and, hence, the ip ' s) . Moreover, when k L(X) i s torsion free, U i s a monomorphism, and the 's on L(X) are induced by the i|; . This gives an easy proof of our main theorem i n the torsion free case, and was done i n [8]. In [8] also, one can k find an application of the properties of the 's on L(X). The Bott isomorphism KSp(X) = KO ^(X) induces an isomorphism L(X) = KO(X) © KO~^(X) (L( ) defined as usual). This isomorphism i s actually a ring isomorphism. By d e f i n i t i o n , KO~^(X) = KO(X/vS4) (XA.Y denotes the smashed product of X and Y). Hence the Adams operations ^ are defined on KO(X) and on KO (X) v i i . The i|) 's on L(X) r e s t r i c t to the \p ' s on KO(.X) . K Moreover, they induce the following commutative diagrams: For k odd: KSp (X) ,2 ,k k -\p KSp(X). Bott /v -A » KO (X) R Bott * , -* KO "(X) For k even: Bott - 4 >K0 (X) KSp(X) ; KO(X) I*2 * 2 e Bott S S p (X) > KO (X) R k - «%» k Hence, i n general, the ip 's on L(X) determine the i/> 's R on KO(X) and KO~4(X) . Also, ip k : L(X) -> L(X) i s a ring homomorphism, whereas ij£ © i|£ : KO(X) © KO~4(X) -> KO(X) © KO~\x) K, K i s not. We have actually computed the ring L(X) and the operations 4) for the quaternionic and complex projective spaces. The l a t e r case as torsion for odd dimensions. The content of the chapters i s as follows: Chapter 1 gives the d e f i n i t i o n of the ring L(X) and the maps A n on L(X) . The main theorem i s proved there. The d e f i n i t i o n of the natural homomorphism U and of the reduced theory L( ) i s given with the i r main properties. v i i i . Chapter 2 has two main theorems. In the f i r s t the isomorphism L(X) - KO(X) <& KO ^(X) i s established. In the second, we compare the k k ip ' s on L (X) with Adams' 1 s . Chapter 3 contains the computation of L(X) and the ip 's for the quaternionic and complex projective spaces. 1. Chapter 1 §1.1. Definitions and preliminaries For A = R, C, or H , and for a f i n i t e CW-complex X , l e t ^ e c t ^ 00 denote the class of A-vector bundles over X , and Vect^ (X) the set of isomorphism classes of A-vector bundles over X . The direct (or Whitney) sum of vector bundles induces a structure of abelian semi-group on Vect^ (X) and the tensor product induces a structure of commutative semi-ring on Vect (X) and Vect (X) . Let R C us write: V(X) = Vect,, (X) « Vect (X) K rl and l e t K ^ 0 0 denote the Grothendieck group of Vect^ (X) and L(X) the Grothendieck group of V(X) • We w i l l also use the alternative notations: KO (X) = K^(X) KU(X) = K C(X) KSp(X) = K^X) We have that L(X) * KO(X) ® KSp(X) . Following [3], §1.5, we r e c a l l that a r e a l (resp. quaternionic) vector bundle over X can be viewed as a complex vector bundle over X together with a structure map, i . e . as a pair (v,T) , where v e (/ect (X) and T : v v i s an isomorphism of the vector bundle v with i t s complex conjugate v , such that T 2 = Id (resp, T 2 = -Id ) v r v (Note, T can be considered as a conjugate-linear map from v to i t s e l f ) . The de t a i l s of t h i s construction are to be found i n 13]. However l e t us r e c a l l that two pairs (v,T) and (v',T') are said isomorphic i f V- and v' are isomorphic complex vector bundles v i a an isomorphism a : v -> v' which commutes with the structure maps, i . e . a o T = T'• » a . This d e f i n i t i o n coincides with the isomorphism of r e a l (resp. quaternionic) vector bundles under the present i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . Hence 1.1.1 VCX) = U[u,S] , {v,T]) y, v, e l/ect (X) , S 2 = Id , T 2 = -Id } where S , T are structure maps and I M , S] and {v,Tj denote the isomorphism classes of ( y , S ) and (v,T) respectively. We define a semi-ring structure on V(X) as follows. Let [ y , S ] , I M ' , S»] e Vect R C X ) fv,T] , [v',T'] e Vect R (X) 3. and define: CIy,sj,o)-(ly',s'j,o) » Qy M , s 8 s ],o) ([y,S],0)-(0,[v,T]) = (0,[y 8 v, S 8 T]) (OJv,T])-(0,[v' ,T' ]) = ([v 8 v» , S 8 f],0) Here the tensor products are taken i n the category of complex vector bundles'. The 0 denotes the isomorphism class of the O-dimensional r e a l or quaternionic vector bundle. It i s easy to check that the structure maps S 8 S* , S 8 T, I 0 T' have the appropriate squares, so that these de f i n i t i o n s make sense. We extend the d e f i n i t i o n of the product for arbitrary elements of L(X) i n the obvious way. Hence V(X) becomes commutative semi-ring and L(X) therefore carries the structure of a commutative ring with unit. Notice that L(X) i s Z2 _graded. Actually L(-) i s a contravariant functor from the category of f i n i t e CW-complexes and continuous maps to the category of Z2~graded commutative rings with unit. I f Y i s another f i n i t e CW-complex and f : X Y i s a continuous map, we denote by f* the induced map L(Y) -*• L(X) . I t i s the direct sum of the maps KO(Y) •> KO(X) and KSp(Y) -> KSp(X) induced by f . §1.2. Main theorem: The ri n g L(X) admits Adams operations, i . e . there are ring homomorphisms: ip k : L(X) •* L(X) k = 1,2,... such that (i) / o / = ^ = / o / k,£ = 1, 2, r r ( i i ) ^ (x) = x^ (mod p) p prime ( i i i ) for a continuous f : X -»- Y , k * * k o f = f o 4* The proof of t h i s theorem w i l l be completed i n 1.6. We need to introduce another concept. §1.3. A-semi-rings The following d e f i n i t i o n s are found i n [4] i n the case of rings. The extension to semi-rings was without problem. A A-semi-ring i s a commutative semi-ring R with unit 1 together with a set of maps A n : R R , n = 0,1,..., such that x, y e R (1) A°(x) = 1 (2) A 1(x) = x (3) An(x+y) = I A r(x) A n r ( y ) r=0 If the semi-ring i s a rin g we w i l l t a l k of a A-ring Let a....a and b,...b be indeterminates and l e t s. 1 q 1 r l and be the i elementary symmetric functions i n a^...a^ and b^.-.b^ respectively. Take q >_max(n,mn) , r >_ n and l e t P (s. .. .s ; a- .. .a ) be the coe f f i c i e n t of t n i n II. . (1+a.b.t) n v 1 n' 1 n y 1 , 3 I j P (s. ...s ) be the coeffic i e n t of t n i n II (1+a. ...a. t) m,n l mn i . <...<i I , I 1 m 1 m P and P are uniquely defined polynomials with coef f i c i e n t s i n Z n m,n n J r J they s p l i t i n : P = P + - P n n n P = P + - P m,n m,n m,n where P + (resp. P + ) i s the sum of the terms of P (resp. P ) n m,n n r m,n having po s i t i v e coefficients and P (resp. P ) i s the sum of the n v r m,n ' terms of P^ (resp. P^ n ) having negative c o e f f i c i e n t s , multiplied by - 1 . Hence P + , P , P + , P have only positive c o e f f i c i e n t s n n m,n m,n and can be interpreted i n any semi-ring with unit. A A-semi-ring R i s a special A-semi-ring i f the following i d e n t i t i e s hold V x , y e R : (4) P n (A 1(x)..,A n(x) ; A 1(y)...A n(y)) + A n(xy) = P n + (A 1(x)...A n(x); A 1(y)...A n(y)) 6. (5) P~ > n (A1(.x) . ... A^ C x ) ) + A mA n C x ) = P m n + C A 1 C x ) . . . A m n ( x ) ) . m,n (the f i r s t i d e n t i t y relates A n(xy) and the A 1(x) , A 1(y) i l, . . . , n ; the second relates A mA n(x) and the A 1(x) , i = l,...,mn) . For convenience we w i l l refer to these i d e n t i t i e s i n the following form: (4') F n(x,y) = G n(x,y) C5») f (x) = G (x) m,n m,n i . e . we write F n Cx,y) for the l e f t hand side of (4), etc.... Moreover, even though we w i l l consider many A-semi-rings, we w i l l not use different symbols for the maps A n and the i d e n t i t i e s ( l ) - ( 5 ) , (4'), (5'). We hope t h i s w i l l not cause any d i f f i c u l t y . Let R and S be two A-semi-rings. A A-semi-ring homomorphism g : R -> S i s a semi-ring homomorphism commuting with the maps A n , i . e . such that g ° A n = A n o g , n = 0 , 1,... The following two propositions motivate the introduction of the previous concepts. 1.3.1 Proposition Let R q be a (special) A-semi-ring. Then the Grothendieck g r o u p R of R i s a C s p e c i a l ) A - r i n g . Proof: I t i s well known that R i s a rin g . The maps A n : R.Q ->• R Q extend to R i n a unique way which s a t i s f i e s (3) (cf. [7], Chap. 12, 1.3). The extension also s a t i s f i e s (1) and (2), hence R i s a A-ring. I f R q i s spec i a l , R i s special, since (4) and (5) are compatible with (3) by lemma 1.5 of 14]. j For k = 1, 2,..., l e t be the unique polynomial with integer coe f f i c i e n t s such that: Q k ( s r . . s k ) = a x k +...+ a q k (with the notation formerly used and q >_ k ) . Then we have 1.3.2 Proposition Let R be a special A-ring and define / ( x ) = Q k(A 1(x),...,A k(x)) for x e R , k = 1, 2,... . Then \p are ring homomorphisms and 4>N^ = 4 ^ = = 1, 2,... r r <jj^ (x) = x^ (mod p) p prime, x £ R Proof: cf [4] prop. 5.1, 5.2. j Examples: (a) For A = R or C , Vect^(X) i s a special A-semi-ring where the A n are induced by exterior powers of vector bundles, i . e . : . A n[v] = ,IA n(v)] v e |/ectA (X) By 1.3.1 KO(X) and KU(X) are special A-rings, and the operations: ip k : KO(X) •* KO(X) tpk : KU(X) -»• KU(X) obtained v i a 1.3.2 are the c l a s s i c a l Adams operations. The proof of these facts are found i n [1] or {4]. (b) Let LU(X) = KU(X) « KU(X) and define a Z2~graded ring structure on LU(X) by (a,b) o (a*,b f) = (aa' + bb', ab'+ a*b) for (a,b) (a',b') e LU(X) . For k = 0, 1,.. set A k(a,0) = (A k(a),0) A^ K(0,b) = (A Z K(b),0) A 2 k + 1(0,b) = ( 0 , A 2 k + 1 ( b ) ) , and define , k A K(a,b) = I ArCa,0) A* r(0,b) r=0 9. LU(X) with these maps i s a special A-ring. This i s direct using the special A-ring properties of KU(X) . (c) Other examples can be found i n [4]. §1.4. A-operations on V(X) For n = 0, 1,..., we define: A n({y,S],0) = ( I A n ( j i ) , A n(S)],0) A 2 n(0,{v,Tj) = ( I A 2 n ( v ) , A 2 n(T)],0) A 211+1,,, r mn\ /n r-, 2n+l / v , 2n+l ,„,. ,.. A (0,{v,Tj) = (OJA (v), A (T)]) using the characterization of V(X) given by 1.1.1 . Checking the squares of the structure maps involved confirms the l e g i t i m i t y of t h i s d e f i n i t i o n . We extend i t to V(X) by: n A n([y,S], [v,T]) = I A r([y,S],0) A n _ r (0,[v,Tj) . r=0 Theorem V(X) together with the A-operations just defined, i s a special A-semi-ring. Proof: Checking the conditions (1), (2), (3) i s d i r e c t , using the properties of exterior powers and, for (.3), v e r i f y i n g a simple i d e n t i t y . Hence V(X) i s a A-semi-ring. We now have to check (4) and (5). We w i l l do the work for (4) only since a similar treatment deals with (5). Using again the lemma 1.5 of 1.4], we remark that we need only to check these i d e n t i t i e s on a set of generators of the semi-group V(X) . The convenient set w i l l be: Vect R CX) U Vect H (X) C V(X) where Vect CX) . and Vect (X) are i d e n t i f i e d with the i r image is. rl under thei r canonical embedding i n V(X) . In X7J, Chap, 5, §6, Husemoller defines the notion of continuous functor, and shows that a continuous functor: l/ect A(0) x.. .xl/ect A(0) -> l/ect A(0) where 0 denotes the 1-point space, induces a functor: l/ect A (X)x...xl/ect A (X) -> l/ect A (X) . The d e f i n i t i o n s and theorems of [7] can c l e a r l y be extended to the case: l/ect A (0)x...x(/ e ct A (0) x (/ect A, (0) x... xVect^, (0) + l/ect^, (0) where A, A', A" take the values R and H . For example, we have the following continuous functors: « : Vect (0) x V e c t A (.0) •> V&ct^ (0) 11. 0 : l/ect A (0) x |/ectA,(0) - VectA„ (0) for (A, A', A") = (R, H, H) , (H, R, H), (H, H, R) or (R, R, R) . \ n : l/ect (0) -> V e c t , (0) for (A,A') = (R, R) or (H, H) and n odd , or (H, R) and n even. These functors respectively induce the direct sum of vector bundles, the tensor product of vector bundles and the exterior powers of vector bundles. The functors F and G are compositions of these n n operations on vector bundles; they are induced by continuous functors Fn,0 ' Gn,0 : " c c tA ( 0 ) X " e c tA' ( 0 ) * " e c tA» ( 0 ) where (A, A', A") = (R, R, R) , (R, H, H) , (H, R, H) or (H, H, H) for n odd, or (H, H, R) for n even. By [7], an equivalence of functors: u n : F _ -»- G A 0 n,0 n,Q induces an equivalence of functors: u : F G' n n and, passing to isomorphism classes of vector bundles, one gets: F = G : Vect (X) x Vect , (X) + Vect ,, (X) . n n A A A 12. However, we are not interested i n the fu n c t o r i a l properties of and G , and an equivalence of the functors F -. and G „ for n n n,0 n,0 vector bundle isomorphisms w i l l be s u f f i c i e n t to give the result wanted. (This can be seen i n greater d e t a i l by analyzing the proof of the theorem 6.2 i n [7], Chapter 5). Let us find out such an equivalence. Since A-vector bundles over a point are es s e n t i a l l y A-vector spaces, we can choose bases, and consider, for each k, k' e N : Fn,0 ' Gn,0 : G z ( - h > ^ x G W , A f ) + G£(k",A") with (A, A', A") as above and k" e N depending on k, k', n, A, A' . k k' k k' (We don't write the more accurate F ' , G '„ for fear of heaviness) n,0 ' n,0 Now, i n order to complete the proof, we need to produce Me G£(k",A") such that; M F n(A,B) = G^ n(A,B) M n,U n,U for a l l (A,B) e G£(k,A) x G£(k',A') . The next lemma serves that purpose. Hence the proof of the theorem i s complete. J 1.4.1 Lemma There i s Me G£(k",A") such that: M F n > Q (A,B) = G n > Q(A,B) M for a l l (A,B) e Gil(k,A) x G£(k',A') 13. Proof; Si m i l a r l y as i n 1.1, r e a l and quaternionic representations of Lie groups can be viewed as complex representations together with some structure maps. This i s carried out i n [2], Chapter 3. The following i s a direct translation of th i s treatment i n term of matrix represen-tations. (It can also be obtained with the help of §1.1. for the 1-point space) • Let E = 1 or 2 and T e Gl (Em,C) such that: TT = Id i f E = 1 TT = -Id i f E = 2 where T denotes the complex matrix with as c o e f f i c i e n t s , the coeff i c i e n t s of T conjugated. Define: ©(Em, C ) T = {A e Gl (Em,C) TA = AT} . Then we have the following isomorphisms: G ; U m,R) ~ Gl(m,<Z) i f SS = Id G£(m,H) ~ Gn(2m,C)s i f S'S' = -Id (The conjugate signs appearing here correspond to the conjugate l i n e a r i t y of the structure maps of {2]). Examples of S, S' are: 14. f 0 -1 0 0 . . . 01 1 0 0 0 . . . 0 S = Id S' = 0 V. 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 1 oJ Using these i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s , the functors F - and G „ n,0 n,0 are as follows: F n > 0 : GACEk,C)T x 6nE'k ,,C') T, G£(E"k",C)F Gn,0 : G £ ( E k ' C > T X G ^ E ' k ' . c ) T . GA(E"k",C)G ( t ) n,0 where E" i s determined by F _(T,T') F „(T,T') = G „(T,T') G „(T,T') n,0 n,0 n,0 n,0 (This equality i s easy to check). The existence of a matrix M e G£(k",A") sa t i s f y i n g the lemma i s equivalent to the existence of a matrix N e Gl(E" k",C) such that: (i) N F n > 0(U,V) = G (U,V> N V (U,V) e 6*(Ek,C) T x G£(E'k',C)T, ( i i ) N F (T,T') = G(T, T') N . One can produce such a N i n the following way. 15. F i r s t , the representation ring R(U(Ek) x U(E'k')) i s a special A-ring, where U(n) i s the unitary group of dimension n (cf. [4] th. 1.5); hence the representations F , G ; UCEk) x'U(E'k') + G£(EMk",C) are equivalent. But two representations of G£(Ek, C) x G£(E'k', C) equivalent on U(Ek) x U(E'k') are equivalent. (cf. [1], proof 4.5). Therefore there exist P e G£(E"k", C) such that ( i i i ) P F n > Q(U,V) = G n > 0(U,V) P V (U,V) e G£(Ek, C) x G£(E'k', C) . Now, ( i i i ) s t i l l holds i f one replaces P by P . F i r s t start by writing ( i i i ) with U, V , and note that F n , G _ commute with the n,0 n,0 conjugation. Now l e t p e C be such that - p p ^ i s not an eigenvalue of P "*T , and define: N = p P + p"P = P(pp -"" 1 I + P - 1 P)p- . One sees that N e G£(E"k", C) and N s a t i s f i e s ( i i i ) , hence i t s a t i s f i e s ( i ) . But since N = N , i t s a t i s f i e s also ( i i ) . This proves the lemma. 1.4.2 Corollary to the theorem L(X) i s a special A-ring. Proof: Theorem §1.4 and proposition 1.3.1. / 16, §1.5. Proof of the main theorem By 1.4.2 and proposition 1.3.2, we obtain the ring homomor-phisms ip with th e i r f i r s t two properties. The l a s t one i s clear since f i s a A-ring homomorphism. §1.6. A natural transformation Recall the canonical homomorphisms c : KO(X) -> KU(X) c' : KSp(X) ->- KU(X) r : KU(X) -> KOCX) q : KU(X) KSp(X) . c and c' are induced by the maps feet (X) ->• feet (X) R C and fect„ (X) -»- feet (X) forgetting the structure maps (cf 1.1); r H. L i s induced by the map l/ect (X) feet (X) forgetting the complex structure; q i s induced by the map feet (X) ->- feet (X) defined by n ~+ n 8 e where e i s the t r i v i a l 1-dimensional quaternionic vector bundle over X . Define: U = c « c' : L(X) -> LU(X) U' = r # q : LU(X) -* L(X) . Proposition The map U : L(X) LU(X) i s a A-ring homomorphism. I f L(X) i s torsion free, U i s a monomorphism, i . e . L(X) i s a sub-A-ring of LU(X) . Proof; The f i r s t part i s obvious from the d e f i n i t i o n of the maps A n / 17. on L(X) . For the second part we have that U' o U = 2 where 2 : LCX) ->• L(X) i s the map x ->• 2x x e L(X) . Cf [5] or [6] for instance. Hence, i f L(X) i s torsion free, U' ° U i s a monomorphism and so i s U . j §1.7. The reduced theory From now on we suppose that the spaces considered have base points: by X we mean a pair (X, Xq) s.t. Xq e X . The inclusion i : x« -*• X induces an exact sequence: Let e be the 1-dimensional quaternionic vector bundle over Xq . L(xq) i s the free abelian group on two generators 1, e , and the 2 k product structure i s given by the r e l a t i o n e = 4 . The maps ip are defined by: 0 -> Ker i * L(X) i L(x_) -> 0 . Define L(X) = Ker i Then we have a natural s p l i t t i n g L(X) - L(X) e L(x n) . k = 1, 3 k = 2, 4 , . . . , . . . Moreover, 18. L(X) - KOCX) © KSp(X) k and the ip 's and U pass to the reduced functors (with LU(X) - KU(X) 9 KU(X)) . F i n a l l y , i f X* denotes the d i s j o i n t union of X with a point which we take as canonical base point, we have that L(X) - L(X +) . Chapter 2 §2.1. Preliminaries Let S n denote the n-dimensional sphere and (X , Xq) and ( Y , V q ) be f i n i t e CW-complexes with base point. Define as usual: X A Y = X X Y / X X y Q xj X q x Y Consider the obvious projection maps: 4 X x s / I 4 4 X S X A S and denote by v the generator of KSp(S ) - Z . Define: : KSp(X) + K0 ( X*S 4) C l"(X x s 4) by $ 1 ( 3 ) = p*(g) • q (v) V g e KSp(X) KO(X) + KSp(X x S 4) C L(X x S 4) by $ (a) = p*(a) • q (v) V a e KO(X) . Since v i s a quaternionic bundle, p*(a) • q (v) and p*(3) • q*(\ are respectively quaternionic and re a l bundles as indicated, f* : K O C X A S 4 ) ^ KOCX x S 4) and f* : KSp(XAS 4) -> KSp(X x s 4) 20. are monomorphisms, and we have the Bott isomorphism theorem: (i) Consider f * KSp (X) * K0 ( X x s ) «- K 0 ( X A S ) then $^ i s an isomorphism onto Im f* ( i i ) Consider ~ $2 ~ L f * ~ L K0(X) -> KSp(X x S ) $• KSp(XAS ) then i - s a n isomorphism onto Im f* . Proof: cf [5]. J Next, we r e c a l l that one defines for n = 0, 1, 2,... K0 _ n(X) = K0(XA S n) and that K0(X) # KO ^(X) can be given a ring structure i n the following way. Let a , a ' e lcO(X) , 8, 3 ' e K0~^(X)=K0(X A sS , and denote the product i n KO(X) « K0~^(X) by x . F i r s t define a x a ' = o c a ' . Now l e t X x s - ^ X x X x s 21. be the maps defined by: A(x,s) = ( x , x,s) Pj^Cx.yjS) = x 4 P2.(x,y,s) = (y,s) for x , y e X , s e S Then y = A * [ P ; L * ( v ) • p£p*CB)l e Im(f* : K O ( X A S 4) KO(XH S4)-) and define a x 3 = (f )~ ( Y) e K*0(X A S ) . S i m i l a r l y , l e t 4 4 A ' 4 4 X x s x S > X x s x x x s A \, 2 4 4 *• 4 * 4 X A S A S X x s X x s be the obvious projections plus the map defined by A'(x,s,t) = (x,s,x,t) 4 for x -e X , s, t e S . Again Y ' = A'*[q* p* ( 3)-q* p * ( B ' ) ] e Im(g*:K0(XA S 4^ S 4) •+ K0(X x S 4 x S 4)) and define 3 x 3 ' = ($ $ 2 ) _ 1 ( g * ) - 1 ( y » ) e K0(X) . (These def i n i t i o n s are equivalent to those of [3] where the de t a i l s can be obtained). §2.2. A ring isomorphism From the Bott isomorphism theorem, we obtain a group isomorphism: B = Id 9 $ 1 : L(X) K0(X) 0 K0~ 4(X) 22. We have the following Theorem; B : L(X) -»• KO(X) 6 KO~4(X) i s a ring isomorphism. Proof: E s s e n t i a l l y , the proof consists of checking the commutativity of the two following diagrams: KO(X) 8 KSp(X) Id 8 $]_ » K O ( X ) 8 K O ( X A S ) KO(X) 8 KO(X x S ) (I) PI<->-P*C-) KO(X x X x s ) A KO(X x S ) f •RSp (X) 1 V K O C X A S4) KSp(X) 8 KSp(X) = ±-*KO(X S ) 0 KO(X AS ) f 8 f (ID KO(X x s 4) 0 KO(X x S 4) & it % (~)-q 0(-) KO(X x S 4 x X x S 4) KO(X x s 4 x s 4) KO(X)' ~> , 4 4 -» KO (X A S A S ) 1 2 In each case, the l e f t hand v e r t i c a l arrow i s the product L(X) and the right hand v e r t i c a l sequence i s the product i n KO(X) « KO~4(X) . Let us check (I) : V a e KO(X) , V g e KSp(X) , A*[p*(a) • p* = A*[p*(»-p* (p*(0) • q*(y))] = f*[p * ( a - g ) q* ( v ) J = f *,(a-g) We used mainly that continuous maps induce ring homomorphisms on L(-) and that p 2 6 A = I d x x g4 and p][ 0 A = p . , 24. Simi l a r l y for (II) k k §2.3. Relation between and ip We need the following Lemma: 4 (i ) L(S ) = ev Z « v Z «~ 4 where v i s the generator of KSp(S ) - Z and e i s the t r i v i a l quaternionic 1-dimensional vector bundle; ( i i ) the ring homomorphisms ip are given by: / ( v ) = k 2v , 2 k ev k = 2, 4, 6,. . ~ , 4 Proof: Let p be generator of KO(S ) - Z , and l e t a be generator of ^ ( S 4 ) . By proposition §1.6, U : *L(S 4) -> LU(S 4) i s a monomor-phism. By [1] or [7], U(p) = (2a,0) and U(v) = (0,a) . (Elements of LU(X) - KU(X) © KU(X) w i l l be written as pairs (x,y)) . Since U(e) e LU(S 4) i s given by U(e) = (0,2) , one has that U(u) = U(e)-U(v) , hence p = ev . Using [1], corr. 5.2, one computes that: i> (0,a) = k (0,a) { k (a,0) k. "~ 1 j 3 ^ • • * lc —* 2 j A ^ • • • 25. Hence: k 2v k 2 2 E V k = 1, 3, k = 2, 4,, / k 4 Remark: the ip 's on L(S ) are now completely determined since we k know the value of ip (e) • Recall (1.3., example (a)) that we have the c l a s s i c a l Adams operations \£ : K O ( X ) -> K O ( X ) and \fc : K O ( X A S 4 ) K O ( X A S 4) . K R The r e s t r i c t i o n of i p k : L ( X ) -> L ( X ) to KO(X) i s ij£ . In the next R theorem, we compare the r e s t r i c t i o n of <pk : 'L(X) -»- T ( X ) to KSp (X) - K O ( X A S 4 ) , with ^ : K O ( X A S 4 ) -> K O ( X A S 4) . K Theorem The following diagrams are commutative. For k = 1, 3,.. *KSp(X) — KSp(X) -Bott ^ A —z > K O ( X A S ) 1 R Bott * K O ( X A S " ) For k = 2, 4,, KSp(X) • KO(X) Bott ^ A —z > K O ( X A S ) "R k 2 k 2 where -r- e denotes the map a -> -y e«a for a e KO(X) Proof: For k = 2, 4,... l£ ^ ( 3 ) = <l£(p*(6) • q*(v)) / p*(g) • / q*(v) p* / ( g ) • q* / ( v ) = p* / ( g ) • q*(| ev) = p ^ C3) -J e q (v> | 4 1 (e./(B)) k <y (*) because ip i s a ring homomorphism on L(-) and R = * KO(-) for a l l k = 1, 2, (**) because ip are natural (Main theorem) . Simi l a r l y for k odd. J Chapter 3 §3.1. Computation for HP n F i r s t we r e c a l l some results. Let r\ be the canonical complex l i n e bundle over CP n and l e t £ be the canonical quaternionic l i n e bundle over HP n . Also cf. §1.6. for C : KSp(X) ->- KU(X) . 3.1.1 Theorem: KU(CPn) i s a truncated polynomial ring over Z with one generator u = n - 1 and one r e l a t i o n ]sn+^~ = 0 . Moreover: i|£(y) = ( l + y ) k - l k = 1, 2,... Proof: c f . [1] For a l l k = 1, 2,..., there i s a unique polynomial T k e Z[X] such that: 1 V 1 T, (z + — - 2) = z + —, - 2 k z k 3.1.2 Theorem KU(HPn) i s a truncated polynomial ring over Z with one generator v = c f £ - 2 and one r e l a t i o n v = 0 . Moreover: ^ ( v ) = T k(v) k = 1, 2,, Proof; The structure of KU(HPn) i s well known. For the Adams operations, the canonical map f : CP 2 1 1"^ -»- HP n induces a monomorphism: given by * n ?n+1 f ; KU(HP ) KU(CP ) f*(.c'?) = n + n . By [ l ] , th. 5.1, n = n 1 Hence f*(v) = f*(c'£ - 2) = n. + - - 2 , and: * k k * k >'c f u£(v) = U£ f (v) = ./£ f - 2) = i|£(n + r f 1 - 2) = ^ ( n ) + / ( r f 1 ) - 2 n k / Hence by n a t u r a l i t y , ^ ( v ) = -^k^) ' / We w i l l now compute L(HP n) and the ij^'s on L(HP n) with the help of the theorem §1.6. We proceed through a series of lemmas. 3.1.3 Lemma g g The cofibration HP n •> HP n -»• S n induces the exact sequences: (1) 0 + LCS""1) L(HP11) S LCHP""") •* 0 ~,„4n. g l ~, g2 ~, n-1. 29. # # (2) 0 -> LUCS ) + LU(HP ) V* LU(HP ) . + 0 . Proof: This results from a study of the long exact sequences of the cofibration i n KO- and KU-theory. For example, we show that g^ i s a monomorphism. One has the following part of exact sequence: + 1cocs 4 n + 1) 5 KO-.VP11) fir1 on? 1 1- 1) ^ KO(S 4 n) -F i r s t one shows inductively that KO (HP ) i s torsion or 0 . Indeed K0 _ 1(HP 1)- KO" 1(S 4) = 0 . Also KO(S 4 n + 1) =0 or Z 2 . Suppose that KO ''"(HP11 1) i s torsion or 0 . Then y : KO "''(HP11 1) ->• KO(S 4 n) - Z i s the 0 homomorphism. Hence 8 i s an epimorphism. But Ker 8 = Im a i s 0 or , so that KO (HP ) i s torsion or 0 , as wanted. From that, K0~ 1(HP n~ 1) K0(S 4 n) - Z i s the 0 homomorphism, hence g^ : K0(S 4 n) K0(HPn) i s a mono-morphism. The same considerations about ^ K 0 ( S 4 n + 5 ) +K0 - 5(HP n) -KO-^HP 1 1- 1) - K 0 ( S 4 n + 4 ) + show, that * ~ —4 4n ~* —4 n» g^ : KO (S ) -»- KO (HP ) i s also a monomorphism. Hence gj : L ( S 4 n ) - L(HP n) i s a monomorphism. (We use the natural isomorphism of §2.2). J 3.1 .4- Corollary L(HP n) i s torsion-free and U : L(HP n) -> LU(HPn) i s a monomorphism. 30. 1 4 Proof: L(HP ) - LCS ) i s torsion free (cf. §2.3 lemma). Then use induction on -n with the exact sequence (1) of lemma 3.1.3. The second assertion of the corollary i s due to §1.6. J Let us denote again the elements of LU(X) as pairs ( a , 3 ) a , g e KU(X) . Also define: 5. = \ l l even i odd 3.1.5. Lemma Im (U : 1!(HPn) +'LU(HPn)) i s the free abelian group 2 n 2 generated by: (2v,0) , (v ,0) (6 v ,0) , (0,v) , (0,2v ),, ( 0 , 6 n + 1 v n ) . Proof: Lemma 3.1.3 and the natural transformation U give the following commutative diagram with exact rows: 0 - L ( S 4 n ) I1 L(HP n) ! 2 LOIP 1 1- 1) - 0 K g # K g # i l J3 0 + LU(S 4 n) + 1 LU(HPn) + 2 LU(HPn 1) •+ 0 . Let a be a generator of KU(S ) - Z . Since: 8 2 ^ , 0 ) = (v\o) g^CO.v1) = (O^ 1) i = 1, 2,...n-1 g ^ C O ) = (0,0) g^CO.v11) = (0,0) one gets that: gj(a,0) = (v n,0) g*(0,a) = (0,v n) We also have that Im i s the free abelian group generated by (6^01,0) and (°» ( 5 n +i a) • ( c f* t 1 ] ) ' BY d e f i n i t i o n , (0,v) = (0, c'?-2) = l i a - e ) e Im U £ and also (2v,0) = (0,2)-(0,v) = U (e)'U (?-e) E Im U 2 . Hence (2v,0), (v 2,0),...,(6 nv n,0), (0,v), (0,2v 2),...,(0,6 n + 1,v n) e Im U 2 , 1 4 Now we can prove the lemma by induction on n . For HP ~ S , cf. §2.3, lemma. Assuming the result for HP n 1 , look at the s p l i t exact sequence: 0 -> Im U x -> Im U 2 -> Im U 3 ^ 0 We can define a s p l i t t i n g map H : Im Im U"2 by H(6 iv 1,0) = (6 v x,0) and H(0,6 i + 1v 1) = (0,6 j V 1 ) for i = l , . . . , n - l . Then we see that Im U 2 - g 2(Im V±) « H(Im Uj) i s as described i n the lemma Theorem: The ring L(HP n) i s generated by 1, e , and x = £ - e 2 n 11 with the relations e =4 and T = 0 . Moreover: Proof: By 3.1.5, Im ( U : L(HP n) •+ L U(HP n)) i s generated by (1,0), (0,2), (0,v) . Since U ( T ) = (0,v) and U(e) = (0,2) we have the structure of L(HP n) . k n Now use 3.1.2 to compute the ip 's on LU(HP ) . The obvious result i s : /(0,v) = \ (0, T f c(v)) k = 1, 3, 5... (T k(v), 0) k = 2, 4, 6... x i Noting that (v ,0) and (0,v ) can be written respectively as U(e) » V(T)X , T T, . U(e) • V(T)X , . , ^ and U(e) • — — - for l = 1, 2,...n , we use the fact that U commutes with the if ' SJ w e g e t the result stated i n the theorem. j~ Examples 2 2 ( T ) = T + 2ex 3 3 2 ^ (x) = T + 3ex + 9x 2 Proof: T 2(x) = x + 4x T 3(x) = x 3 + 6x 2 + 9x . 33. §3.2. Computation for CP n We s t i l l denote by p a generator of 1cU(CPn) . Let g be a generator of 'KUCS ) - Z . Let p Q = r(y) e £b(CPn) and y 2 = r(yg 2) e £o~4(CPn) , where r : KU(X) -> KO(X) i s as i n §1.6. Let v 2 = $~ 1(y 2) e KSp(CPn) . 3.2.1. Theorem Let n be even. ^(CP 1 1) i s the free abelian group generated H -1 n -1 by p Q, P Q , . . . , P 2 , v 2 , v 2p Q,...,v 2p2 . The m u l t i p l i c a t i v e 2 2 structure i s completed by the r e l a t i o n = P Q • Moreover: / ( y Q ) = T k(y Q) k = 1, 2, * kCv 2) = -I v2 — T. (p n) k = 1, 3,, y Q k v r 0 y Proof; 16] gives the structure of KO(CPn) « KO~ 4(CP n) . Hence we have the structure of L(CP n) by §2.2. In order to compute the ip k ,s , we remark that TCCP 1 1 . ) i s torsion-free (for n even). Therefore, U : L(CP n) -> LU(CP n) i s a monomorphism. We f i r s t determine t h i s map. Let $ : KU(X) •> KU (X) be the complex Bott isomorphism as described i n £3J §2.2 for instance. The following diagram i s 34. commutative (compare {5J) to" 4(X) $ KU~4(X) KSp(X) KU(X) where c, c' as i n §1.6. Moreover c » r = 1 + (~) : KU(X) KU(X) (cf [6] for instance). With the help of these remarks, we find out that: U(u Q) = (c o r (u), 0) = (y+y, 0) U(v 2) = (0, $ 2 c' $ x ( v 2 ) ) = (0, $ 2 c'(y 2)) = (0, $" 2(g 2y + g 2y)) = (0, *~ 2(g 2(y+y))) 2 2 since g = g (cf [6]) = (0, y+y)" By theorem 3.1.1 we can compute i f k : LU(CP n) -> LU(CP n) /(y,0) = ( ( l + y ) k - l , 0) /(0,y) = 4 (0, (l+y) K-l) { ((1+y) -1, 0) lc 1 j 2 y • lc X ^ 3 ^ • • lc 2 ^ 4,. 35. From t h i s , we get: /(y+y, 0) = CT k(y+y), 0) k = 1, 2, / ( 0 , y+y) = \ (0, T k(y+y)) k = 1, 3, (T k( M+ii), 0) k = 2, 4,, (Details as i n proof of 3.1.2). F i n a l l y , since ((y+y) 1, 0) = U ( y 0 ) 1 (0, (y+7) 1) = U ( y 0 ) i _ 1 U(v 2) for i = 1, 2,...— , we get the result as stated i n the theorem, j 3.2.2. Theorem (i) For n = 4t + 1 , "L(C7U) i s the direct sum of the free 2 2t 2 t - l abelian group generated by y Q, y Q,...,y 0 , v 2 > v 2y Q,...,y 2y Q 2t+l and the c y c l i c group of order two generated by y^ . The 2 2 mu l t i p l i c a t i v e structure i s completed by the r e l a t i o n V2 = ^0 " ( i i ) For n = 4t + 3 , L(CP ) i s the direct sum of the free 2 2t+l 2t abelian group generated by y Q, y Q,...,y 0 , v^, ^2VQ''''>v2y0 a n d 2t+l the c y c l i c group of order two generated by ' ^ e m u l t i p l i c a t i v e 2 2 structure i s completed by = y^ . Moreover 36. * CP0) = T k(y Q) / ( v 2 ) -~0 W k = 1, 2, k = 2, 4, k = 1, 3, where the suitable coefficient has to be taken modulo 2 i n each case. Proof; [6] and our §2.2 give again the structure of lT(CPn) . , k < . ,n+l . For the i|> 's , the natural inclusion CP CP induces an epimorphism: iT(cp n + 1) - iT(cp n) n + 1 i s even. Hence, using the result just found for <L(CPn+"'") , i t i s clear out to get the result for L(CP ) , by na t u r a l i t y of the \p s I 3.2.3. Remark The result for the truncated complex projective spaces are £ n+£ 77 n+£ now also obvious. Looking at the cofibration CP -> CP -> CP /' £ , one observes that 77 induces an embedding; * ~-„„n+£. „. ~, ii+£. 77 : I A C P / C P £ ) •> L C C P ) M -5 £ /v/ —1 £ since KO (CP ) = KO (CP ) = 0 . It i s then clear how to get the n+£ results for CP / £ . Bibliography J. F. Adams, Vector f i e l d s on Spheres, Annals of Math., Vol. 75 (1962), pp. 603-632. J. F. Adams, Lectures on Lie Groups, W. A. Benjamin, i n c . , New York (1969). M. Atiyah, K-Theory, W. A. Benjamin, i n c . , New York (1967). M. A. Atiyah and D. 0. T a l l , Group Representations, X-Rings and the J-Homomorphism, Topology, Vol. 8 (1969) pp. 253-297. R. Bott, Quelques remar ques sur l e s theoremes de p£riodicite, B u l l . Soc. Math. France Vol 87 (1959), pp. 293-310. M. F u j i i , K^-Groups of Projective Spaces, Osaka J . Math., Vol. 4 (1967), pp. 141-149. D. Husemoller, Fiber Bundles, McGraw-Hill, New York (1966). F. S i g r i s t and U. Suter, Eine Anwendung der K-Theorie i n der Theorie der H-Raume, Commentarii Math. H e l v e t i c i , Vol. 47 (1972), pp. 36-52.
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Adams operations on KO(X) ⊕ KSp (X)
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Featured Collection
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Adams operations on KO(X) ⊕ KSp (X) Allard, Jacques 1973
pdf
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | Adams operations on KO(X) ⊕ KSp (X) |
Creator |
Allard, Jacques |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Date Issued | 1973 |
Description | Let KO(X) be the real and KSP(X) be the quaternionic K-theory of a finite CW-complex X . The tensor product and the exterior powers of vector bundles induce on L(X) = KO(X) ⊕ KSP(X) the structure of Z₂ -graded λ-ring. In this thesis it is shown, that the Adams operations Ѱk : L(X) → L(X) , k = l, 2, 3,..., which are associated to this λ-ring, are ring homomorphisms and satisfy the composition law Ѱk ₀ Ѱℓ = Ѱℓk = Ѱℓ ₀ Ѱk , k, ℓ = 1, 2, 3,... Finally, the ring L(X) together with its Ѱ-operations is explicitely determined for the quaternionic and complex projective spaces. |
Subject |
K-theory. |
Genre |
Thesis/Dissertation |
Type |
Text |
Language | eng |
Date Available | 2011-03-22 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
Rights | For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use. |
DOI | 10.14288/1.0080120 |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/32701 |
Degree |
Master of Science - MSc |
Program |
Mathematics |
Affiliation |
Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Department of |
Degree Grantor | University of British Columbia |
Campus |
UBCV |
Scholarly Level | Graduate |
AggregatedSourceRepository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- 831-UBC_1973_A6_7 A44_3.pdf [ 1.5MB ]
- Metadata
- JSON: 831-1.0080120.json
- JSON-LD: 831-1.0080120-ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 831-1.0080120-rdf.xml
- RDF/JSON: 831-1.0080120-rdf.json
- Turtle: 831-1.0080120-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 831-1.0080120-rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 831-1.0080120-source.json
- Full Text
- 831-1.0080120-fulltext.txt
- Citation
- 831-1.0080120.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
https://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.831.1-0080120/manifest