- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- A computational theory of decision networks
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
A computational theory of decision networks Zhang, Nevin Lianwen
Abstract
This thesis is about how to represent and solve decision problems in Bayesian decision the ory (e.g. Fishburn 1988). A general representation named decision networks is proposed based on influence diagrams (Howard and Matheson 1984). This new representation incorporates the idea, from Markov decision processes (e.g. Puterman 1990, Denardo 1982), that a decision may be conditionally independent of certain pieces of available information. It also allows multiple cooperative agents and facilitates the exploitation of separability in the utility function. Decision networks inherit the advantages of both influence diagrams and Markov decision processes. Both influence diagrams and finite stage Markov decision processes are stepwise solvable, in the sense that they can be evaluated by considering one decision at a time. However, the evaluation of a decision network requires, in general, simultaneous consider ation of all the decisions. The theme of this thesis is to seek the weakest graph-theoretic condition under which decision networks are guaranteed to be stepwise-solvable, and to seek the best algorithms for evaluating stepwise-solvable decision networks. A concept of decomposability is introduced for decision networks and it is shown that when a decision network is decomposable, a divide and conquer strategy can be utilized to aid its evaluation. In particular, when a decision network is stepwise-decomposable it can be evaluated not only by considering one decision at a time, but also by considering one portion of the network at a time. It is also shown that stepwise-decomposability is the weakest graphical condition that guarantees stepwise-solvability. Given a decision network, there are often nodes and arcs that can harmlessly removed. An algorithm is presented that is able to find and prune all graphically identifiable removable nodes and arcs. Finally, the relationship between stepwise-decomposable decision networks (SDDN‘s) and Markov decision process is investigated, which results in a two-stage approach for evaluating SDDN’s. This approach enables one to make use of the asymmetric nature of decision problems, facilitates parallel computation, and gives rises to an incremental way of computing the value of perfect information.
Item Metadata
Title |
A computational theory of decision networks
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
This thesis is about how to represent and solve decision problems in Bayesian decision the
ory (e.g. Fishburn 1988). A general representation named decision networks is proposed
based on influence diagrams (Howard and Matheson 1984). This new representation
incorporates the idea, from Markov decision processes (e.g. Puterman 1990, Denardo
1982), that a decision may be conditionally independent of certain pieces of available
information. It also allows multiple cooperative agents and facilitates the exploitation
of separability in the utility function. Decision networks inherit the advantages of both
influence diagrams and Markov decision processes.
Both influence diagrams and finite stage Markov decision processes are stepwise
solvable, in the sense that they can be evaluated by considering one decision at a time.
However, the evaluation of a decision network requires, in general, simultaneous consider
ation of all the decisions. The theme of this thesis is to seek the weakest graph-theoretic
condition under which decision networks are guaranteed to be stepwise-solvable, and to
seek the best algorithms for evaluating stepwise-solvable decision networks.
A concept of decomposability is introduced for decision networks and it is shown that
when a decision network is decomposable, a divide and conquer strategy can be utilized
to aid its evaluation. In particular, when a decision network is stepwise-decomposable it
can be evaluated not only by considering one decision at a time, but also by considering
one portion of the network at a time. It is also shown that stepwise-decomposability is
the weakest graphical condition that guarantees stepwise-solvability.
Given a decision network, there are often nodes and arcs that can harmlessly removed.
An algorithm is presented that is able to find and prune all graphically identifiable removable nodes and arcs.
Finally, the relationship between stepwise-decomposable decision networks (SDDN‘s)
and Markov decision process is investigated, which results in a two-stage approach for
evaluating SDDN’s. This approach enables one to make use of the asymmetric nature
of decision problems, facilitates parallel computation, and gives rises to an incremental
way of computing the value of perfect information.
|
Extent |
3458370 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-04-08
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0051475
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1994-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.