INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGELESS SINGLE-PHASE SOLUTIONS FOR AC-DC POWER FACTOR CORRECTED CONVERTERS by Md. Muntasir Ul Alam M.E.Sc., Western University, 2010 B.Sc., Islamic University of Technology, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The College of Graduate Studies (Electrical Engineering) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Okanagan) July 2017 © Md. Muntasir Ul Alam, 2017ii The undersigned certify that they have read, and recommend to the College of Graduate Studies for acceptance, a thesis entitled: INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGELESS SINGLE-PHASE SOLUTIONS FOR AC-DC POWER FACTOR CORRECTED CONVERTERS Submitted by Md. Muntasir Ul Alam in partial fulfillment of the requirements of The degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. Dr. Wilson Eberle, Associate Professor, School of Engineering, UBC Supervisor, Professor Dr. Thomas Johnson, Associate Professor, School of Engineering, UBC Supervisory Committee Member, Professor Dr. Loïc Markley, Assistant Professor, School of Engineering, UBC Supervisory Committee Member, Professor Dr. Shahria Alam, Associate Professor, School of Engineering, UBC University Examiner, Professor Dr. Yunwei Li, Professor, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta External Examiner, Professor 17 July 2017 (Date submitted to Grad Studies) Additional Committee Members include: Dr. Sumi Siddiqua, Associate Professor, School of Engineering, UBC Neutral Chair iii Abstract In modern power supplies and battery chargers, a front-end power factor correction (PFC) AC-DC converter is used to comply with regulatory requirements for input current harmonics. The prevalence of standards and recommended practices to meet harmonic current limits has gained, and continues to gain, momentum over recent years. Additionally, the improvement of overall converter efficiency is critical for the emergence and acceptance of these converter technologies, to meet the standard of efficiency and power factor requirements. This dissertation presents some innovative solutions for bridgeless non-isolated and isolated PFC AC-DC converters. All proposed converter solutions realize bridgeless converter operation to reduce conduction losses and operate in hybrid resonant pulse-width-modulation (HRPWM) mode. The PWM switches share the same gating signal, so the converter does not need extra circuitry to sense the positive and negative ac input line-cycle operation. The first contribution is a non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter, which has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. The converter architecture also enables simple implementation of lightning and surge protection systems. Moreover, this converter can survive sustained over-voltage events and can limit the voltage stress on the converter and downstream components. The second contribution is a non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter, which realizes soft-switching operation to reduce switching losses. This converter can operate at high switching frequency to increase power density. The third contribution is a three-level non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter, which has high voltage gain. This converter also provides soft-switching operation of all the power devices. Due to the three level architecture, all commutations occur with a voltage level equivalent to half the output voltage, which further reduces switching losses. This converter can utilize lower voltage rated devices, which reduces system cost. iv The final contribution is a single-stage bridgeless isolated AC-DC converter. This converter shows low conduction loss due to bridgeless operation and low voltage stress of the secondary diodes, low switching loss due to soft-switching operation, and a transformer that has no dc magnetizing current and does not store energy. These characteristics minimize the transformer size and increases transformer efficiency. v Preface I am the lead investigator for this research work, responsible for performing literature survey, topology investigation, theoretical analysis, design, simulation and experimentation. This work was done under the guidance of my thesis supervisor Dr. Wilson Eberle. This work was also supervised by Dr. Fariborz Musavi, Dr. Deepak Gautam, Mr. Chris Botting and Mr. Nicholas Dohmeier of Delta-Q Technologies Corp. This thesis contains four contribution chapters that present results that have been published or going to be submitted for consideration in the form of IEEE refereed papers and scientific journals of which I am the lead author. vi Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... x List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. xv Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................... xvii Dedication ................................................................................................................................................ xviii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 General Background ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Total Harmonic Distortion ........................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Power Factor ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.3 Hard-Switched Converters ........................................................................................................... 6 1.1.4 Soft-Switched Converters ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Research Motivation ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Thesis Organization ............................................................................................................................ 9 2 Literature Review ................................................................................................................................ 11 2.1 Non-isolated AC-DC PFC Topologies ............................................................................................. 12 2.1.1 Passive AC-DC PFC Topologies ............................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Active AC-DC PFC Topologies ................................................................................................ 14 2.2 Single-stage isolated AC-DC PFC Topologies ................................................................................. 20 2.3 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 23 3 A Hybrid Resonant Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter ..................................... 25 3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Proposed Converter Operating Principles ......................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Resonant Frequency Operation .................................................................................................. 28 3.2.2 Above Resonance Operation ...................................................................................................... 29 3.2.3 Below Resonance Operation ...................................................................................................... 31 3.3 Modes of Operation .......................................................................................................................... 33 3.4 Operation during Startup and In-rush Considerations ...................................................................... 36 3.5 Analysis and Design ......................................................................................................................... 37 3.5.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio ................................................................................................... 37 vii 3.5.2 Voltage Stress Analysis ............................................................................................................. 37 3.5.3 Design Example ......................................................................................................................... 38 3.6 Experimental Results ........................................................................................................................ 39 3.7 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 48 4 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter ....................................... 50 4.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 50 4.2 Modes of Operation .......................................................................................................................... 51 4.3 Analysis and Design ......................................................................................................................... 56 4.3.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio ................................................................................................... 56 4.3.2 Voltage Stress Analysis ............................................................................................................. 56 4.3.3 ZVS Condition for the Switches ................................................................................................ 57 4.3.4 Design Methodology .................................................................................................................. 58 4.3.5 Converter Loss Analysis ............................................................................................................ 59 4.4 Experimental Results ........................................................................................................................ 61 4.5 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 71 5 A High Voltage Gain Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter ........ 72 5.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 72 5.2 Modes of Operation .......................................................................................................................... 73 5.3 Analysis and Design ......................................................................................................................... 78 5.3.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio ................................................................................................... 78 5.3.2 ZVS Requirements for the Switches .......................................................................................... 79 5.3.3 Design Methodology .................................................................................................................. 80 5.3.4 Converter Loss Analysis ............................................................................................................ 80 5.4 Experimental Results ........................................................................................................................ 82 5.5 Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 88 6 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless Isolated Single-Stage AC-DC PFC Converter ..................................... 90 6.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 90 6.2 Modes of Operation .......................................................................................................................... 91 6.3 Analysis and Design ......................................................................................................................... 96 6.3.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio ................................................................................................... 96 6.3.2 ZVS Conditions for the Switches ............................................................................................... 97 6.4 Simulation Results ............................................................................................................................ 99 6.5 Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 103 viii 7 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 104 7.1.1 A Hybrid-Resonant Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter .......................... 104 7.1.2 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC PFC Converter ............................................................. 104 7.1.3 A High Voltage Gain Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC PFC Converter ............................. 105 7.1.4 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless Single-stage AC-DC PFC Converter......................................... 106 7.1.5 Comparison and Feature Summary of the Proposed Topologies ............................................. 106 7.2 Future Work .................................................................................................................................... 107 7.2.1 Experimental Validation of Bridgeless Single-stage AC-DC PFC Converter ......................... 107 7.2.2 Interleaved Soft-switching AC-DC PFC Converter ................................................................. 107 7.2.3 High Frequency Converter Operation ...................................................................................... 108 References ................................................................................................................................................. 109 Appendix ................................................................................................................................................... 115 ix List of Tables Table 3.1 Design specifications .................................................................................................................. 38 Table 3.2 List of key converter components ............................................................................................... 40 Table 4.1 Design Specifications.................................................................................................................. 58 Table 4.2 Key components for the HRPWM converter. ............................................................................. 62 Table 4.3 Key components for the conventional boost PFC converter. ...................................................... 62 Table 5.1 Design Specifications.................................................................................................................. 80 Table 5.2 Key components for the high gain ZVS HRPWM converter. .................................................... 82 Table 5.3 Key components for the conventional PFC converter. ............................................................... 82 Table 7.1 Comparison and feature summary of the proposed topologies ................................................. 107 x List of Figures Figure 1.1 Simplified system block diagram of a universal two-stage converter system. ............................ 2 Figure 1.2 Simplified system block diagram of a universal single-stage converter system. ........................ 2 Figure 1.3 Ideal input current and voltage with unity power factor and no current distortion. .................... 5 Figure 1.4 Turn-on and turn-off transition in a hard-switched converter. .................................................... 6 Figure 1.5 Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS). ................................................................................................... 7 Figure 1.6 Zero Current Switching (ZCS). ................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2.1 Uncontrolled full-wave rectifier. ............................................................................................... 13 Figure 2.2 Vin and Iin of uncontrolled full-wave rectifier with capacitive filter. ......................................... 13 Figure 2.3 Uncontrolled full-wave rectifier with inductive filter................................................................ 14 Figure 2.4 Vin and Iin of uncontrolled full-wave rectifier with inductive filter. ........................................... 14 Figure 2.5 Conventional boost PFC converter. ........................................................................................... 15 Figure 2.6 Interleaved boost PFC converter. .............................................................................................. 16 Figure 2.7 Bridgeless boost PFC converter. ............................................................................................... 16 Figure 2.8 Semi-bridgeless boost PFC converter. ....................................................................................... 17 Figure 2.9 Soft-switching bridgeless boost PFC converter proposed in [34]. ............................................ 17 Figure 2.10 Soft-switching bridgeless boost PFC converter proposed in [35]. .......................................... 18 Figure 2.11 Totem-pole PFC boost converter. ............................................................................................ 18 Figure 2.12 Converter topology proposed in [40]. ...................................................................................... 19 Figure 2.13 Converter topology proposed in [46]. ...................................................................................... 19 Figure 2.14 Converter topology proposed in [54]. ...................................................................................... 20 Figure 2.15 CCM single-stage PFC topology proposed in [56], [57]. ........................................................ 21 Figure 2.16 CCM single-stage PFC topology proposed in [58]. ................................................................. 21 Figure 2.17 ZVZCS single-stage PFC topology proposed in [61]. ............................................................. 22 Figure 2.18 Bridgeless single-stage half-bridge PFC topology proposed in [65]. ...................................... 23 Figure 3.1 Proposed HRPWM PFC converter. ........................................................................................... 28 Figure 3.2 Waveforms for gating signal and current through S1 and D2 during resonant frequency operation. ................................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 3.3 Converter operation during t1-t2. ................................................................................................ 29 Figure 3.4 Waveforms for gating signal and current through S1 and D2 during above-resonance operation. ................................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 3.5 Converter operation during t1-t2. ................................................................................................ 30 Figure 3.6 Converter operation during t2-t4. ................................................................................................ 31 xi Figure 3.7 Waveforms for gating signal and current through S1 and D2 during below-resonance operation. ................................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 3.8 Converter operation during t1-t2. ................................................................................................ 32 Figure 3.9 Proposed HRPWM converter waveforms in CCM. .................................................................. 34 Figure 3.10 HRPWM bridgeless topology conduction path during Interval-1. .......................................... 34 Figure 3.11 HRPWM bridgeless topology conduction path during Interval-2. .......................................... 35 Figure 3.12 HRPWM bridgeless topology conduction path during Interval-3. .......................................... 35 Figure 3.13 Inrush current path for positive line cycle. .............................................................................. 36 Figure 3.14 Equivalent circuit during startup neglecting the low impedance of Co. .................................. 36 Figure 3.15 Proposed converter experimental prototype. ........................................................................... 40 Figure 3.16 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of input voltage, Vin (ch3: 50 V/div), input current, Iin (ch 1: 10 A/div) and output voltage, Vo (ch2: 200 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. .................................................................... 41 Figure 3.17 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across switch S1, VS1 (ch2: 100 V/div) and gating signal for S1, Vg (ch3: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. ........................................................................................................ 42 Figure 3.18 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 3: 20 V/div) and current through inductor Lr, ILr (ch 4: 10 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. ........................................................................................ 43 Figure 3.19 Conventional boost converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of inrush current, Iinrush (ch 1:5A/div), and input voltage, Vin (ch 4:200V/div) at Vin = 265V, Vo = 0 V. ..................... 43 Figure 3.20 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of inrush current, Iinrush (ch 1:1A/div), and input voltage, Vin (ch 4:200V/div) at Vin = 265V, Vo = 0 V. ............................ 44 Figure 3.21 Conventional boost converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of withstand input voltage, Vin (ch1: 200 V/div), voltage across boost switch, Vs (ch 2: 200 V/div) and output voltage, Vo (ch4: 100 V/div). ................................................................................................... 45 Figure 3.22 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of withstand input voltage, Vin (ch1: 200 V/div), voltage across boost switch, Vs1 (ch 2: 200 V/div), voltage across resonant capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 3: 100 V/div) and output voltage, Vo (ch4: 100 V/div). ........... 45 Figure 3.23 Thermal image of diode bridge rectifier of boost PFC converter at 650W. ............................ 46 Figure 3.24 Thermal image of diode bridge rectifier of proposed converter at 650W. .............................. 46 Figure 3.25 Proposed HRPWM converter measured efficiency as a function of output power at fs =70 kHz. ......................................................................................................................................... 47 xii Figure 3.26 Proposed HRPWM converter power factor as a function of output power at fS =70 kHz. ...... 48 Figure 3.27 Input current harmonics at Vin = 120 V and 240 V at full load condition for proposed converter. ................................................................................................................................. 48 Figure 4.1 Proposed soft-switching bridgeless AC-DC PFC converter topology. ...................................... 51 Figure 4.2 Proposed soft-switching HRPWM converter waveforms in CCM. ........................................... 52 Figure 4.3 Proposed converter modes of operation. ................................................................................... 55 Figure 4.4 Loss distribution comparison at Vin = 100 V, fs = 150 kHz, Po = 650 W, Vo = 400 V. .............. 60 Figure 4.5 Proposed converter experimental prototype. ............................................................................. 61 Figure 4.6 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 20ms/div of input voltage Vin (ch3: 100 V/div), input current Iin (ch2: 10 A/div) and output voltage Vo (ch1: 100 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................... 63 Figure 4.7 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S1, Vds (ch2: 100 V/div) and gating signal for S1, Vgs (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................................................... 64 Figure 4.8 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S2, Vds (ch3: 100 V/div) and gating signal for S2, Vgs (ch4: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................................................... 64 Figure 4.9 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of voltage across capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 2: 100 V/div), current through inductor Lr, ILr (ch 4: 5 A/div), input current Iin (ch3: 5 A/div) and gating signal for S1, Vgs (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. ............................................................................................................ 65 Figure 4.10 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 2μs/div of voltage across capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 2: 100 V/div), current through inductor Lr, ILr (ch 4: 5 A/div) and gating signal for S1, Vgs (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. ............. 66 Figure 4.11 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 500ns/div of voltage across diode D1, VD1 (ch 2: 200 V/div) and current through diode D1, ID1 (ch 3: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................................. 66 Figure 4.12 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 500ns/div of voltage across diode D2, VD2 (ch 2: 100 V/div) and current through diode D2, ID2 (ch 3: 2 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................................. 67 Figure 4.13 Efficiency as a function of load at Vin = 100 V and 240 V, Vo = 400 V and fs = 150 kHz for the ZVS HRPWM and boost PFC converters. ........................................................................ 68 xiii Figure 4.14 Total loss as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V and fs = 150 kHz for the ZVS HRPWM and boost PFC converters. ....................................................................................... 68 Figure 4.15 Thermal images of diode bridge rectifier: (a) boost PFC converter, and (b) ZVS HRPWM converter. ................................................................................................................................. 69 Figure 4.16 Thermal images of PFC MOSFETs: (a) boost PFC converter, and (b) ZVS HRPWM converter. ................................................................................................................................. 69 Figure 4.17 Power factor as a function of load at Vin = 100 V and 240 V, Vo = 400 V for proposed ZVS HRPWM converter. ................................................................................................................. 70 Figure 4.18 Input current harmonics at Vin = 100 V and 240 V at full load condition for proposed ZVS HRPWM converter. ................................................................................................................. 70 Figure 5.1 Proposed soft-switching bridgeless AC-DC PFC converter topology. ...................................... 72 Figure 5.2 Proposed soft-switching converter waveforms in CCM. ........................................................... 74 Figure 5.3 Proposed converter modes of operation. ................................................................................... 77 Figure 5.4 Loss distribution comparison at Vin = 100 V, fs = 150 kHz, Po = 650 W, Vo = 400 V. .............. 81 Figure 5.5 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of input voltage Vin (ch3: 100 V/div) and input current Iin (ch3: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................................................... 83 Figure 5.6 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S1, VS1 (ch3: 50 V/div) and gating signal for S1, VGS1 (ch4: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................... 84 Figure 5.7 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S2, VS2 (ch2: 50 V/div) and gating signal for S2, VGS2 (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. .................................................................... 84 Figure 5.8 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 1μs/div of voltage across diode D1, VD1 (ch 4: 100 V/div) and current through diode D1, ID1 (ch 1: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. ............................................................ 85 Figure 5.9 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 1μs/div of voltage across diode D2, VD2 (ch 4: 100 V/div) and current through diode D2, ID2 (ch 1: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. ............................................................ 85 Figure 5.10 Efficiency as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V and fs = 150 kHz for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM and the benchmark boost PFC converters. ...................... 86 Figure 5.11 Total loss as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM and the benchmark boost PFC converters. .............................................................. 87 xiv Figure 5.12 Power factor as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM converter. ........................................................................................................ 87 Figure 5.13 Input current harmonics at Vin = 100 V and 240 V at full load condition for proposed ZVS HRPWM converter. ................................................................................................................. 88 Figure 6.1 Proposed soft-switching bridgeless single-stage isolated converter. ......................................... 91 Figure 6.2 Proposed single-stage soft-switching converter waveforms in CCM. ....................................... 94 Figure 6.3 Proposed soft-switching single-stage converter waveforms in CCM. ....................................... 95 Figure 6.4 Soft-switching single-stage converter experimental waveforms at 2ms/div of input voltage Vin (100 V/div), input current Iin (10 A/div) and output voltage Vo (25 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. .................................................................................. 100 Figure 6.5 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 2μs/div of voltage across switch S1, Vds (100 V/div) and current through S1, Ids (5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. ......................................................................................................... 101 Figure 6.6 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 2μs/div of voltage across switch S2, Vds (100 V/div) and current through S2, Ids (5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. ......................................................................................................... 101 Figure 6.7 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across diode D4, VD4 (20 V/div) and current through diode D4, ID4 (20 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. .......................................................................................... 102 Figure 6.8 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across diode D3, VD3 (20 V/div) and current through diode D3, ID3 (20 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. .......................................................................................... 102 Figure A- 1 Circuit schematic of conventional boost converter... ............................................................ 115 Figure A- 2 Circuit schematic of the converter proposed in Chapter 3... ................................................. 116 Figure A- 3 Circuit schematic of the converter proposed in Chapter 4... ................................................. 117 Figure A- 4 Circuit schematic of the converter proposed in Chapter 5... ................................................. 118 xv List of Abbreviations AC, ac Alternating Current BCM Boundary Conduction Mode CCM Continuous Conduction Mode DC, dc Direct Current DCM Discontinuous Conduction Mode EMI, emi Electro-Magnetic Interference IGBT Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor MOSFET Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor PWM Pulse Width Modulation RMS, rms Root Mean Square SiC Silicon Carbide TCM Triangular Conduction Mode VA Volt-Ampere ZCS Zero Current Switching ZVS Zero Voltage Switching Prefixes for SI Units G Giga (109) k Kilo (103) M Mega (106) m Milli (10-3) n Nano (10-9) p Pico (10-12) μ Micro (10-6) SI Units A Amperes C Coulombs F Farads H Henries Hz Hertz s seconds xvi V Volts W Watts Ω Ohms ° Degrees xvii Acknowledgements I would like to give my extended gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Wilson Eberle, for his patience and guidance throughout my graduate studies. Most of all, I would like to thank him for giving me this opportunity and providing me with the support to expand my knowledge and participate in this rewarding field. I would also like to thank all of my past and present colleagues from Delta-Q Technologies. In particular, I would like to thank Chris Botting, Deepak Gautam, Marian Craciun, Colin Lee, Steve Blaine, Fariborz Musavi and Murray Edington for all their support and valuable discussions on several topics. Additionally, I would like to thank my graduate classmates and friends, Colin Clark, Wayne Lu and Hamidreza Hafezinasab, for their help and valuable discussions on several topics. I would also like to thank Delta-Q for allowing me their generous use of personnel and lab space at their Burnaby office. I thank my family for their love, care and patient over the years. Special gratitude and appreciation goes to my wife, Sharmin Akhtar, who has stood with me and positively influenced my life. Her encouragement has always been a comfort to me whenever I was undergoing hardships. Thanks and praise be to God, who makes all things possible. He is my provider and His grace is sufficient for me. To Him be all the glory and love. xviii Dedication To my family 1 1 Introduction The front-end AC-DC converter is a key component of power supplies and battery charger systems [1]. AC-DC converters are found in a wide variety of industrial and consumer electronics products such as battery chargers for industrial and automotive systems, telecommunication rectifiers, cellular phones, and personal computers. As the adoption rate of these products increases, the stress on the utility grid is projected to increase significantly at times of peak demand. Therefore, efficient and high power factor charging is critical in order to minimize the utility load stress, and reduce the charging time. In addition, a high power factor is needed to limit the input current harmonics drawn by these chargers and to meet regulatory standards, such as IEC 61000-3-2 [2]. This thesis focuses on high-performance single-phase solutions for non-isolated and isolated AC-DC power factor corrected converters. A variety of circuit topologies and control methods have been developed for the PFC application [3]-[6]. Single-phase active PFC techniques can be divided into two categories: the single-stage approach and the two-stage approach. In both cases, due to safety regulations, since both the line voltage and the intermediate bus voltage are at hazardous voltage levels, galvanic isolation (usually achieved using an isolation transformer) is required to keep the (generally much lower) output voltage touch-safe (i.e. less than 60 V). The single-stage approach is suitable for low power applications where power is processed in one stage that includes an isolation transformer. In the two-stage approach, power is processed first by a front-end PFC stage, followed by a second DC-DC converter stage and the isolation transformer is usually included in DC-DC converter. 2 AC/DC PFC Boost ConverterIsolated DC/DC Converter DC OutputControllerDC Link Bus CapacitorsUniversal AC InputVinAC Input FilterDC Output FilterRL Figure 1.1 Simplified system block diagram of a universal two-stage converter system. Figure 1.1 illustrates a simplified block diagram of a universal input two-stage PFC technique. The PFC stage rectifies the input AC voltage and transfers it into a regulated intermediate DC link bus. The converter is controlled to shape the input current for near-unity power factor. The following DC-DC stage then converts the DC bus voltage into a regulated output DC voltage, which is required to meet the regulation and transient requirements. Diode Bridge RectifierIsolated DC/DC Converter DC OutputControllerInternal Bulk CapacitorsUniversal AC InputVinAC Input FilterDC Output FilterRL Figure 1.2 Simplified system block diagram of a universal single-stage converter system. Figure 1.2 illustrates a simplified block diagram of a universal input single-stage PFC technique. In a single-stage converter there is no dedicated PFC converter in the front end. The isolated DC-DC converter with diode bridge rectifier in the front end both controls shaping of the input current to achieve near-unity power factor and regulates the output voltage. An internal bulk capacitor is used to handle the instantaneous 3 difference in power between the input pulsating power and the constant output power. Unlike in the two-stage PFC converter, the bulk-capacitor voltage in the single-stage converter is not regulated since the control freedoms are reduced by the integration of the PFC AC-DC and DC-DC switches into one single switch. 1.1 General Background Power quality is an important concept in the design and analysis of AC-DC converters [7]. In this section, an overview of total harmonic distortion (THD) and power factor (PF) is presented. In addition, hard-switching and soft-switching operation are discussed to clarify the importance of soft-switching transition in a power converter. 1.1.1 Total Harmonic Distortion THD is defined as the ratio of the non-fundamental rms values to the rms fundamental component. The total harmonic distortion for current is given by THD =√∑ 𝐼𝑛,𝑟𝑚𝑠2∞𝑛 = 2𝐼1,𝑟𝑚𝑠 (1-1) Requirements and regulations for the line voltage THD are strict, and a voltage THD of only 10% can cause problematic interactions with sensitive loads [8]. Since the power grid line voltage is generally well regulated and has minimal distortion, it is a reasonable to assume the input voltage is perfectly sinusoidal to simplify analytical techniques. Input current THD, however, can easily exceed 100%, depending on the load and converter used. 1.1.2 Power Factor The ratio of real power, P, to the apparent power, S, is defined as power factor. Real power contributes to actual work through the transfer of energy. A resistance heater, for instance, generates heat purely 4 through real power. Apparent power is a scalar quantity and is the product of the rms current Irms and rms voltage Vrms, as given in (1-2). If a load is purely resistive and consumes all transferred energy, its apparent power is equal to its real power. If however, apparent power is not equal to the real power, there exist energy storage devices, such as capacitors and inductors, storing and releasing energy during the energy conversion process. If such a case, a byproduct is incomplete net energy transfer to the load. 𝑆 = 𝐼𝑟𝑚𝑠𝑉𝑟𝑚𝑠 (1-2) Power factor provides a dimensionless measure of useable energy efficiency, with values constrained between one and zero. This relationship is shown in equation (1-3). When the sinusoidal source voltage is perfectly in phase with the sinusoidal source current, as in Figure 1.3, the power factor is unity. PF =𝑃𝑆 (1-3) With unity power factor, the current drawn from the source is minimized and the load appears purely resistive from the input source, thereby maximizing power transfer to the load. Practically, unless the load is purely resistive, unity power factor is impossible, but power factors exceeding 0.99 are achievable. If a normally non-sinusoidal load, such as a computer power supply, is controlled to draw a sinusoidal load current, this control method is called power factor correction (PFC). 5 tPower factor = 1THD = 0%vaciac Figure 1.3 Ideal input current and voltage with unity power factor and no current distortion. There is a direct relationship between total harmonic distortion and power factor. A term called the displacement factor, that relates the fundamental current phase φ1 to the fundamental voltage phase θ1, is defined by equation (1-4). In addition to the displacement factor, a term called the distortion factor, which relates the fundamental rms current to the total rms current, is defined by equation (1-5). displacement factor = cos(𝜑1 − 𝜃1) (1-4) distortion factor =𝐼1,𝑟𝑚𝑠𝐼𝑟𝑚𝑠 (1-5) The definition of power factor is the product of the displacement and distortion factor (1-6), and with no DC current component, as given by (1-7). PF = (distortion factor)(displacement factor) (1-6) PF = (1√1 + (THD)2) cos(𝜑1 − 𝜃1) (1-7) 6 1.1.3 Hard-Switched Converters Typically, conventional power factor correction converters operate in hard-switching mode, which means the power devices (e.g. IGBTs or MOSFETs) are turning on and turning off with the presence of voltage and current during the switching transition. In PFC applications, a power device turning on has the bus voltage (typically in the range of 350-600 V) across it as it changes state. During a switching interval (less than 0.5 microseconds), there is a finite time when the power device begins to conduct, and the voltage across the device begins to fall at the same time as current begins to flow through it. The simultaneous presence of voltage across the transistor and current through it (overlap between voltage and current) means that power is being dissipated within the device during the switching transition time. A similar phenomenon occurs when a transistor turns off with the full current flowing through it. Typical voltage, current and switching loss power waveforms during the turn-on and turn-off transitions in a hard-switched converter are shown in Figure 1.4. VsIsTurn-on transitionTurn-on power lossTurn-off transitionTurn-off power losstt Figure 1.4 Turn-on and turn-off transition in a hard-switched converter. 7 Furthermore, high frequency operation is desirable to reduce passive components size and increase power density. However, high switching frequency operation increases switching losses, resulting in reduced converter efficiency. Hence, it is desirable to have soft-switching operation at high switching frequency operation (e.g. typically above 100 kHz). 1.1.4 Soft-Switched Converters The overlap between voltage and current prior to switching transitions has to be reduced to achieve an efficiency improvement and lower electro-magnetic-interference (EMI) noise. The purpose of soft-switching techniques is to decrease or eliminate the simultaneous presence of voltage and current through the power device without reducing the switching frequency. Soft-switching techniques usually refer to zero voltage switching (ZVS) and zero current switching (ZCS) as shown in Figure 1.5 and Figure 1.6 respectively, which reduces the turn-on losses and turn-off losses respectively. Moreover, the low EMI noise generated from a soft-switched converter allows the converter to be switched at a higher frequency to increase power density. VsIsVgtVgIs +-Vs Figure 1.5 Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS). 8 tVgIsVsVgIs +-Vs Figure 1.6 Zero Current Switching (ZCS). As shown in Figure 1.5, ZVS can be achieved by forward biasing the anti-parallel diode of the semiconductor switch prior to applying gating signal to turn-on the switch and similarly ZCS can be achieved by reducing the current through the switch to zero prior to turning off the gating signal as shown in Figure 1.6. If a converter operates with ZVS, then the turn-off losses can be easily reduced by placing a lossless snubber (capacitor) directly across the switch. By doing this, the switches are naturally protected from large di/dt at turn-on with the help of ZVS and from large dv/dt with the lossless snubber capacitor. Therefore, ZVS operation is mainly considered in this research. 1.2 Research Motivation The objective of this thesis is to investigate and conduct research on the high-performance single-phase solutions for AC-DC power factor corrected converters for electric vehicle battery chargers. The thesis investigates both single-stage and two-stage PFC approaches. A variety of circuit topologies have been developed for PFC applications. The two-stage approach is the most commonly used approach. In this approach, a PFC stage is used at the front-end to force the line current to track the line voltage while the second stage isolated DC-DC converter provides a regulated output DC voltage. While the two-stage approach is cost effective in high-power applications, its cost-effectiveness is diminished in low-power applications due to the additional PFC power stage and control 9 circuit. A low cost alternative solution to this problem is the single-stage approach where the PFC input-stage is integrated with the isolated DC-DC converter. In both cases, the improvement of overall converter efficiency is critical for the emergence and acceptance of these converter technologies; as the charger efficiency increases, the converter size decreases. Additionally, to meet the efficiency and power factor requirements and regulatory standards for the AC supply mains, power factor correction is essential. In conventional PFC converters, it is very important to design proper circuitry to reduce inrush current, as they inherently have high inrush current at start-up and lack of lightning and surge protection due to the direct connection of the AC input voltage through the PFC diode and PFC inductor to the bus capacitors. Addressing this drawback in conventional PFC converters requires additional circuitry, complexity, and often impacts system efficiency. In this dissertation, PFC circuit topologies which have inherent inrush current limiting capabilities are investigated. Due to the requirement for high power density, power supplies and chargers are required to deliver more power with smaller volume. As a key component of a charger system, the front-end AC-DC converter must achieve high efficiency and power density. In this dissertation, several conventional non-isolated and isolated front-end AC-DC converter topologies are investigated and three new bridgeless non-isolated and one new bridgeless isolated power factor corrected converter are proposed to improve the efficiency, which is critical to minimize the converter size. 1.3 Thesis Organization This thesis is organized into six chapters. In Chapter 1, the importance and need for PFC AC-DC converters is introduced, establishing the motivation for this thesis. Chapter 2 provides a detailed literature review of non-isolated and isolated PFC AC-DC converters. In Chapter 3, a new non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter is proposed, which has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. The circuit description and modes of operation in the steady state are 10 presented. The converter is validated with an experimental prototype and results are presented, demonstrating the effectiveness and its suitability for inrush current-limiting capabilities. In Chapter 4, a new non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter is proposed, which realizes soft-switching operation to reduce switching losses. The modes of operation, detailed design procedure and a complete loss analysis are presented. The soft-switching operation is validated with an experimental prototype and results are presented. In Chapter 5, a new three-level non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter is proposed, which has high voltage gain. The circuit description, modes of operation, design procedure in steady state, and a complete loss analysis are presented. Finally, the proposed converter is experimentally validated showing the feasibility of the three-level operation along with soft-switching transition of all power devices. In Chapter 6, a new single-stage bridgeless isolated AC-DC converter is proposed, which shows low conduction loss due to bridgeless operation and low voltage stress of the secondary diodes, low switching loss due to soft-switching operation, and a transformer that operates with no dc magnetizing current and no stored energy. The circuit description, modes of operation, a design procedure in steady state, and a complete loss analysis are presented. These benefits are validated with an experimental prototype and results are presented. Chapter 0 summarizes the contributions of this thesis and provides possible areas of future work and improvement for applications of bridgeless AC-DC converter for power factor correction. 11 2 Literature Review The general form of PFC implementation can be achieved by using an AC-DC converter at the front end followed by a DC-DC converter. This is referred to as the two-stage PFC approach. Depending on the current through the inductor in the first stage, the PFC AC-DC converter can operate in continuous conduction mode (CCM) [9], boundary conduction mode (BCM) [10]-[11], or discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) [12]-[13]. Recently, triangular conduction mode (TCM) operation has also been proposed [14]. In a particular switching cycle, the mode of operation depends on the continuity of the inductor current [15]. The implementation of PFC in the BCM, DCM and TCM modes of operation is relatively easier than CCM. However, in these modes, it requires a large input filter due to the inherently high current ripple. The high current ripple also introduces high RMS currents, which leads to high conduction losses, and high turn-off current in the PFC switch, which leads to high switching losses. The EMI impact is also adverse with these modes of operation. As a result, they are not a good choice for medium to high power applications, and are restricted for lower power applications. On the other hand, the CCM mode of operation offers low current ripple, which minimizes conduction and switching losses, hence it is the most common mode used in PFC converters. In PFC applications, the buck, buck-boost converter and boost converter topologies can e used. However, the boost converter operating in CCM is the most popular PFC topology for the following reasons: - The boost converter generates low peak current compared with buck and buck-boost converters. Low peak current translate to low switching losses and hence improved efficiency. - The discontinuous input current in the buck and buck-boost converters make them less favorable for achieving unity power factor. It also generates high differential-mode EMI current. - To reduce the line current harmonics, the buck and buck-boost converters use relativity larger inductors compared with the boost converter, which results in poor load transient response. 12 - Buck and buck-boost converters have higher line current distortion compared with boost converters. This happens when the input voltage is lower than the output voltage. The boost converter operating in CCM is used in this thesis as the benchmark candidate for the non-isolated single-phase PFC AC-DC converter. The objectives of the PFC converter are to maintain unity power factor at the input side, and to regulate bus voltage at the output side. On the other hand, in single-stage isolated PFC converter, the power is processed by one stage, unlike the two-stage PFC approach. This converter can also operate in CCM, BCM or DCM. However, CCM is also preferred in the single-stage approach for the reasons discussed above. 2.1 Non-isolated AC-DC PFC Topologies 2.1.1 Passive AC-DC PFC Topologies The objective of this section is to provide a concise summary of the methodologies and problems associated with uncontrolled passive AC-DC rectification circuits. The performance of the basic uncontrolled full-wave rectifiers are presented and their limitations in terms of THD and power factor are shown. The most popular uncontrolled rectifier, illustrated in Figure 2.1, is used as a single-phase AC-DC converter [16]. This solution is very simple and effective. It has a low component count, making it an inexpensive solution to provide a DC voltage from an AC source. This converter also does not require control. As observed in Figure 2.1, a filter capacitor is added after the input diode bridge to minimize the output voltage ripple. For PFC applications, this solution is not attractive as the power factor is very low due to the pulsed current shape of the input ac current, as shown in Figure 2.2. 13 D1D3Vin RoCoD2D4 Figure 2.1 Uncontrolled full-wave rectifier. tVinIin Figure 2.2 Vin and Iin of uncontrolled full-wave rectifier with capacitive filter. The topology shown in Figure 2.3 adds a large inductor, which forces the input current to be continuous over the half-line AC input cycle without high peak currents, as is the case with the uncontrolled rectifier with capacitive filter. Although the input current is continuous (Figure 2.4), the power factor and THD are again unacceptable in meeting the regulatory standards. Furthermore, due to the low line frequency AC input, the physical size of the inductor impractically large and expensive for many applications. 14 D1D3Vin RoCoD2D4Lin Figure 2.3 Uncontrolled full-wave rectifier with inductive filter. tVinIin Figure 2.4 Vin and Iin of uncontrolled full-wave rectifier with inductive filter. Generally, for PFC applications at power levels exceeding 50 W, the uncontrolled full-wave converter is not suitable due to high harmonic currents, low power factor, and a significant reduction in the maximum available power deliverable to the load. Other passive filtering techniques are possible, but suffer from inflexibility when load, or input conditions change, as well as large volume and size, and high cost [17]. Significant benefits can be realized through the use of controlled active PFC, therefore allowing considerably greater output power levels. 2.1.2 Active AC-DC PFC Topologies The boost converter following a diode bridge rectifier and operating in CCM is the most widely used AC-DC PFC converter [18]. It uses a front-end diode bridge to rectify the AC input voltage to DC, which 15 is then followed by the boost section, as shown in Figure 2.5. This converter is very simple, and near-unity power factor can be achieved with proper control techniques. The inductor ripple current is directly seen at the converter’s input and requires filtering to meet EMI specifications. The diode output current is discontinuous and needs to be filtered out by the output capacitor Co. In this topology the output capacitor ripple current is very high, and its value is the difference between the diode current and the DC output current [19]. D1SD2D3Vin RoD4CoLin D Figure 2.5 Conventional boost PFC converter. Due to high switching losses in the boost switch and high conduction losses in the diode bridge, this converter suffers from poor efficiency. Moreover, in high frequency operation the boost diode reverse recovery charge introduces diode turn-off losses and EMI. In practical applications as the power level increases, the diode bridge losses become significant, causing challenges both for overall converter efficiency, and for cooling localized hot spots. The interleaved boost PFC converter illustrated in Figure 2.6 is simply two boost converters in parallel operating with the switch gating signals 180° out of phase. The input current is the sum of the two inductor currents ILin1 and ILin2. Because the inductor’s ripple currents are out of phase, they tend to cancel each other out and therefore reduce the input ripple current caused by the boost inductors [22]-[22]. Interleaving also reduces the output capacitor ripple current as a function of the duty cycle [23]. In addition, the interleaved boost converter takes advantage of effectively paralleling semiconductors, and by having them switched 16 out of phase, it doubles the effective switching frequency, reducing the required input EMI filter size [24]. But it still has the problem of high-switching losses and heat management for the input rectifier diode bridge, and suffers from lower efficiency at light load, and low line conditions, compared to the non-interleaved boost PFC converter. D3 D4D5VinD6Lin2D2RoCoD1Lin1S1 S2 Figure 2.6 Interleaved boost PFC converter. Unlike the boost and interleaved boost PFC converters, there is no diode bridge rectifier in the dual boost/bridgeless boost converter topology - shown in Figure 2.7 [25]-[27]. This topology reduces the total semiconductor count from six to four, and reduces conduction losses and the associated heat management issue in the input rectifier bridge. However, the dual boost converter also has high switching losses due to hard-switching operation of the PWM switches. In the semi-bridgeless converter, shown in Figure 2.8, since the return path inductance conducts only a small portion of the total return current, the total converter inductance is twice that of the conventional boost PFC converter [28]-[30]. S2D2Vin RoCoLinD1S1 Figure 2.7 Bridgeless boost PFC converter. 17 Vin RoCoLin1D4D3S2D2S1D1Lin2 Figure 2.8 Semi-bridgeless boost PFC converter. To reduce the switching losses of bridgeless and semi-bridgeless converters, soft-switching topologies have been proposed [31]-[35]. However, the topology proposed in [31], [33], and [34] reduces turn-off losses only and the auxiliary circuit of the proposed converter in [32] and [35] is complex. The H-bridge converter proposed in [36] requires three isolated current sensors, increasing complexity. D2VinLinD1S1RoCoLrS2 S3D3D4D5 Figure 2.9 Soft-switching bridgeless boost PFC converter proposed in [34]. 18 RaD2VinLinD1RoCoLrD3D4D5S1 S2 S3TrCaD6 Figure 2.10 Soft-switching bridgeless boost PFC converter proposed in [35]. The totem-pole converter, illustrated in Figure 2.11, does not need two PFC inductors as the semi-bridgeless converter does [37]. However, the totem-pole converter uses the MOSFET body diode to carry the load current, creating a reverse recovery problem, which makes it unfavorable to use in CCM operation [38]. To reduce the reverse recovery losses of the body diode, the topologies in [39]-[42] have been proposed. However, in these circuits it is necessary to sense the positive and negative line-cycle operation to properly control the PWM switches, therefore the control and sensing is somewhat complex. As a solution, the totem-pole converter proposed in [43] can be driven with the same PWM signals for both PWM switches. The drawback of this converter is the increased number of passive elements. The converter proposed in [44] realizes high utilization of the power semiconductors while reducing the boost inductor size and line filter requirements. The drawback of this converter is the high number of semiconductors. S1RoCoLinD2VinD1S2 Figure 2.11 Totem-pole PFC boost converter. 19 S1Lin1D4VinS2Co RoD3D2D1Ls Lin3Lin2 Figure 2.12 Converter topology proposed in [40]. To reduce conduction loss, variations of the bridgeless PFC topologies based on the Cuk and SEPIC converters have been proposed [45]-[52]. The second inductor used in the Cuk and SEPIC converters is relatively large in size, which reduces power density. Moreover, the topologies proposed in [45], [48], [50] and [52] have an increased number of passive elements, which add cost and reduce power density. VinLin1D3D2S2S1Lin2 RoCoLSD1C1 C2 Figure 2.13 Converter topology proposed in [46]. The DC-DC converter proposed in [53] can realize ZVS for both switches, and has galvanic isolation. For AC-DC conversion, this converter requires a diode bridge rectifier, increasing conduction losses. The AC-DC boost converter topology proposed in [54] realizes bridgeless converter operation to reduce conduction losses. The drawback of this converter is the undesirable voltage spike across the PWM switches, limiting its use for high frequency and high power applications. Moreover, this converter requires complex variable switching frequency digital control, and the PWM switches are hard-switched. The 20 topology proposed in [55] operates in DCM, and is best suited for low power applications (i.e. below 300 W). VinLinS2RoCoLr D1S1CrD2 Figure 2.14 Converter topology proposed in [54]. 2.2 Single-stage isolated AC-DC PFC Topologies In single-stage isolated AC-DC PFC converters, the power is processed by one stage. The traditional two-stage PFC converter has good power factor and can be used for wide ranges of input voltage and output power and is well known and has relatively good overall performance. However, the two-stage approach needs an additional PFC stage; hence, the component count and total cost are high, which is undesirable for low power application. For low power applications, to reduce the component count and cost, alternatives have been investigated by attempting to integrate the PFC input stage with the isolated DC-DC converter [56]-[58]. A PFC inductor is still necessary to shape the input current. An internal bulk-capacitor is needed to handle the instantaneous difference in power between the input pulsating power and the constant output power. Unlike in the two-stage PFC converter, the bulk-capacitor voltage in the single-stage converter is no longer regulated since the control freedoms are reduced by the integration of the PFC AC-DC and DC-DC switches into one single switch, or single switch network. 21 In a single-stage converter, the front-end integrated PFC can be a boost, buck/boost, forward or flyback converter. The flyback converter is the simplest and most common of the single-stage topologies. It has the minimum number of semiconductor devices, which makes it favorable for low cost implementation. The flyback converter has several disadvantages, including high voltage stress on the PWM switch, high switching losses due to hard-switched operation of the PWM switch, and high conduction losses due to the diode bridge rectifier. Moreover, the flyback transformer needs to store energy, requiring a larger transformer core size. The forward converter does not need to store energy in the transformer, hence the transformer size becomes smaller compared with the flyback converter. However, all other drawbacks remain. As a result, the flyback and forward converters are suitable only for low power applications. D1 D2D3VinD4Lin D1CBSLrD3D2 D4LoCo RoTx Figure 2.15 CCM single-stage PFC topology proposed in [56], [57]. D1 D2D3VinD4Lin D1CBSD2D3LoCo RoTxCr Figure 2.16 CCM single-stage PFC topology proposed in [58]. 22 Single-stage AC-DC converters based on the half-bridge converter provide low voltage stresses and ZVS operation of the PWM switches [59]-[61]. Active-clamping techniques [62]-[64] have been applied to the single-stage PFC AC-DC converters. However, the majority of these development efforts have been focused on only reducing switching power losses. The previous single-stage PFC AC-DC converters [59]-[64] need a full-bridge diode rectifier. Use of a full-bridge diode rectifier increases the conduction losses and decreases the power efficiency. Especially at low line voltage, the full-bridge diode rectifier causes high conduction losses, resulting in additional thermal management. These problems can be overcome by eliminating the full-bridge diode rectifier. Sw2Sw1VinLlkLbRoCoDo1Do2Lo1Lo2C2C1Cr Figure 2.17 ZVZCS single-stage PFC topology proposed in [61]. The single-stage converter proposed in [65] doesn’t need a diode bridge rectifier. This converter can achieve ZVS for the PWM switches to reduce switching losses. However, this converter operates in DCM and therefore is limited to very low power applications. The single-stage bridgeless converter proposed in [54] realizes simple implementation with a minimum number of semiconductor devices. This converter reduces the transformer size and increases the transformer efficiency, as the transformer does not store energy and has no DC magnetizing current. However, this converter operates with hard switching, increasing the switching losses. 23 Vin LbS1D1S2D2CdLlkLmCbRoCoLoDo1Do2+ -NpNs1Ns2 Figure 2.18 Bridgeless single-stage half-bridge PFC topology proposed in [65]. 2.3 Summary This section presented an overview of non-isolated two-stage and single-stage isolated AC-DC PFC topologies. The limitations of passive AC-DC PFC topologies were explored; their high THD and low power factor contribute to poor power quality, explaining the necessity of active power electronic devices to realize high power quality through power factor correction. Active PFC topologies were discussed, and specifically the boost and boost derived PFC converter topologies were presented. The limitations of the boost PFC converter topology were discussed. The disadvantages of the front end diode-bridge rectifier was explained, showing the desirability of bridgeless PFC operation. The advantages of the dual boost/bridgeless converter were discussed. The bridgeless converters can minimize semiconductor conduction losses. The limitations of hard switching operation of boost and bridgeless boost converter were presented, explaining the desirability of soft-switching operation in PFC converters. PFC topologies based on Cuk and SEPIC converters were presented. The advantages of these topologies were discussed. The PFC topologies with bridgeless and soft-switching operation were presented. Advantages including lower switching and conduction losses show why bridgeless operation with soft-switching capability is desirable for PFC converters. The state-of-the-art bridgeless soft-switching PFC topologies create high voltage stress on the PFC switches, limiting them to lower power applications 24 only. New PFC converter topologies with bridgeless and soft-switching operation are needed for high power applications. Finally, an investigation into existing single-stage isolated AC-DC PFC topologies was presented. The limitations of the flyback and forward topologies were shown, including high voltage stress and larger transformer size. Different soft-switching single-stage topologies were discussed. Bridgeless soft-switching isolated topologies were presented and their advantages discussed. All the state-of-the-art bridgeless soft-switching topologies operate in DCM mode and so are suitable only for lower power applications. New single-stage bridgeless soft-switching PFC converter topologies are needed that can operated in CCM for high power applications. 25 3 A Hybrid Resonant Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter† 3.1 Overview In boost derived PFC converters, it is very important to design proper circuitry to reduce the inrush current as they inherently have high inrush current at start-up and lack of lightning and surge protection due to the direct connection of the AC input voltage through the PFC diode and PFC inductor to the bus capacitors. In these converters, inrush currents occur when the PFC circuit is connected to an input voltage with a peak higher than the instantaneous DC bus voltage. Similarly, if an AC power interruption occurs during normal operation for a period long enough for the dc bus capacitor to discharge below the peak of the AC input, inrush currents will flow upon restoration of AC power. Addressing these drawbacks in boost-derived converters requires additional circuitry, complexity, and often impacts system efficiency. Hence, for practical applications these converters require inrush current and surge-limiting to prevent damage on connection to AC power. For high efficiency PFC converters of several hundred Watts and greater (i.e. > 400 W), in-rush current and surge-limiting is typically achieved by placing a current-limiting device (e.g. a resistor or positive temperature co-efficient device (PTC)) in series with the PFC circuit and shorting this device out with a relay after the difference between the bus voltage and peak rectified AC input is sufficiently small. These surge-limiting circuits add cost, complexity, and often regulatory difficulties when requiring voltage † The content of this chapter has been published, and is in press in the following conference proceedings and journal, respectively: [1] M. Alam, W. Eberle and N. Dohmeier, "An Inrush Limited, Surge Tolerant Hybrid Resonant Bridgeless PWM AC-DC PFC Converter," in Proc. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, Sept. 2014, pp. 5647-5651. [2] M. Alam, F. Musavi and W. Eberle, "A Hybrid Resonant Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter for Off-road and Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Battery Charging," in Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf., Mar. 2014, pp. 1641-1647. [3] M. Alam, D. Gautam, C. Botting, N. Dohmeier, F. Musavi and W. Eberle, “A Hybrid Resonant Pulse-Width Modulation Bridgeless AC–DC Power Factor Correction Converter” in press, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2638806. 26 sensing and control of the relay crossing isolation boundaries (if there is an isolated dc-dc converter followed by the PFC converter). These surge-limiting circuits also need to be tolerant of AC power brownouts and blackouts which again add cost and complexity. Consider the scenario where the AC surge-limiting resistor has been shorted out by the relay and the AC power drops out for several cycles, preventing the PFC from maintaining the PFC bus voltage. During this short time the dc bus voltage (output voltage of the PFC converter) will drop while it supplies downstream loads. When AC power is restored the AC input relay will still be shorting out the surge-limiting resistor and allow a potentially damaging surge current to flow through the PFC components and eventually damage the power devices. This and many other AC power quality issues can make a robust surge-limiting implementation complex and expensive. In boost derived PFC converters, a metal-oxide-varistor (MOV) is designed to protect the charger against an overvoltage transient. To do this, the MOV will begin to conduct current when the voltage across it reaches its clamping voltage. This action clamps (limits) the voltage by applying a short circuit across the AC line. The current handling capability of a MOV during this type of event – most commonly caused by lightning – is tremendously high, and will limit the voltage rise at the MOV to under 700 V, even with thousands of amperes flowing through the MOV. Typically, a MOV is rated for its energy handling capacity in joules, and its clamping voltage – the voltage at which the MOV begins to conduct. Because the MOV protects against overvoltage by shorting the AC line, the length of event that it will protect against is very limited. The current required to reduce the voltage of the AC line is very high – hundreds of amperes. Since the MOV in a charger/power supply is rated 275 V and 300 J, even a 100 A surge at 275 V can only last 10 ms before the MOV would be damaged. As previously discussed, monitoring at only one site showed that surges lasted minutes to hours – and thus there are MOV failures. 27 The purpose of this chapter is to propose a hybrid resonant pulse-width modulated (HRPWM) AC-DC PFC converter, which has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. The converter architecture also enables simple implementation of lightning and surge protection systems. Moreover, this converter can survive sustained over-voltage events and can limit the voltage stress on the converter and downstream components. These properties help to make a robust and reliable converter system. Section 3.2 provides the operating principles of HRPWM converters. A detailed operating condition for the HRPWM converter is presented. In Section 3.3, the modes of operation of the proposed converter is presented. Section 3.4 provides the proposed converter operation during start-up. Section 3.5 provides a detailed analysis and a design example of the proposed converter. Finally, Section 3.6 presents experimental results showing the inherent in-rush current limiting and sustained over-voltage capability of the converter, along with a summary in Section 3.7. 3.2 Proposed Converter Operating Principles The proposed HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter topology is illustrated in Figure 3.1. It is bridgeless and has only one input inductor. The switches S1 and S2 can be driven with the same PWM signal; hence it is not necessary to sense the positive or negative AC line-cycle operation. The voltage conversion ratio of the proposed converter is the same as the boost converter. However, during start-up this converter operates with step-down characteristics at very low duty cycles, reducing the start-up inrush current. Therefore, the converter architecture inherently exhibits lightning and surge protection. The HRPWM operation virtually eliminates the reverse recovery problems with the body diodes of the PWM switches. The input voltage is clamped with two slow diodes D3 and D4. 28 LinS2S1VinD3D4RoCoD1vS2+-vS1vD1 +-vCr+-LrD2CrvD2+-vLr+-iiniS1iS2iD2iD1+-+- Figure 3.1 Proposed HRPWM PFC converter. The HRPWM converter operates in hybrid-resonant mode when the switches are on and pulse-width-modulation (PWM) mode when the switches are off. Both modes occur during a single switching cycle. In the resonant mode, inductor Lr and capacitor Cr resonate. The resonant frequency has a significant impact on the operation of the converter, and can be higher, lower or equal to the switching frequency. Thus, there can be three possible resonant modes of operation when the switches are on, which are described in the sub-sections that follow. 3.2.1 Resonant Frequency Operation The condition for at-resonant frequency operation, where the resonant frequency is equal to the switching frequency, is given by (3-1), where the resonant period Tr of the resonant tank Lr-Cr is defined by (3-2). The current waveforms for switches S1 and S2 and diode D2 are provided in Figure 3.2. The converter circuit is provided in Figure 3.3 with the current paths noted during the resonant period. 𝑇𝑟 = 2𝑇𝑜𝑛 (3-1) 𝑇𝑟 = 2𝜋√𝐿𝑟𝐶𝑟 (3-2) 29 iS1Tr = 2TonTont1 t2 t3S1, S2iD2iLrttt Figure 3.2 Waveforms for gating signal and current through S1 and D2 during resonant frequency operation Vin LinCs1Ds1S1CrS2Cs2Ds2D4D3D2LrD1RoCo Figure 3.3 Converter operation during t1-t2. With resonant frequency operation, diode D2 turns off at zero-current, enabling the turn-off current of S1 to be low, thereby reducing the turn-off switching losses in S1. However, in an AC-DC converter the duty cycle, D varies significantly. In order to maintain a constant on-time interval for operation at resonance, the converter needs to operate with a variable switching frequency, which increases complexity. 3.2.2 Above Resonance Operation At above-resonance operation, the resonant period is longer than the switching period. The condition for above-resonance operation is given by (3-3). The current waveforms for switches S1 and S2 and diode 30 D2 are provided in Figure 3.4. The converter equivalent circuits for this mode are provided in Figure 3.5 and Figure 3.6, with the current paths noted. 𝑇𝑟 > 2𝑇𝑜𝑛 (3-3) iS1iD2iLrS1, S2TonTr > 2TonTr = 2Tont3t1 t2 t4ttt Figure 3.4 Waveforms for gating signal and current through S1 and D2 during above-resonance operation. Vin LinCs1Ds1S1CrS2Cs2Ds2D4D3D2LrD1RoCo Figure 3.5 Converter operation during t1-t2. 31 Vin LinCs1Ds1S1CrS2Cs2Ds2D4D3D1D2LrRoCo Figure 3.6 Converter operation during t2-t4. It can be observed from Figure 3.4 that during the interval (t1-t2,) the resonant current iLr follows the current path as shown in Figure 3.5 and the current path changes during (t2-t4,) as shown in Figure 3.6. The switch S1 turns off while there is current in the Lr-Cr resonant branch. This hard turn-off of S1 increases loss and electromagnetic interference. However, one benefit of this mode is that it does not require variable switching frequency operation as is required for resonant frequency operation. Therefore, the control can be implemented using a standard average current mode control integrated circuit (IC). 3.2.3 Below Resonance Operation At below-resonance operation, the resonant period is shorter than the switching period. Thus the condition for below-resonance operation is given by (3-4). Current waveforms for switches S1 and S2 and diode D2 are provided in Figure 3.7. The converter circuit is provided in Figure 3.8 with the current paths noted. 𝑇𝑟 < 2𝑇𝑜𝑛 (3-4) 32 iS1Tont1 t2 t3 t4Tr < 2TonTr = 2TonS1, S2iD2iLrttt Figure 3.7 Waveforms for gating signal and current through S1 and D2 during below-resonance operation. Vin LinCs1Ds1S1CrS2Cs2Ds2D4D3D2LrD1RoCo Figure 3.8 Converter operation during t1-t2. It can be observed from Figure 3.7 that D2 turns off with zero current at t2, and the turn-off current of S1 is low compared with above-resonance operation. Thus, it reduces the turn-off losses of S1. Below-resonance operation also does not require a variable switching frequency, hence it can be easily implemented using a standard average current mode control IC. However, one drawback of below-resonance operation is high peak current at low duty cycles when the input voltage is high. 33 In order to use a standard commercially available average current mode control IC, fixed switching frequency operation of the proposed converter is required. In addition, as the input voltage and duty cycle slowly change over a line cycle, the converter transitions through all three resonant operating modes. 3.3 Modes of Operation For simplicity, the discussion that follows refers only to the positive AC half-line cycle operation. Key waveforms for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 3.9, over one switching cycle, for below-resonance operation. Interval-1(t0-t1): This interval starts when switches S1 and S2 are turned on. The input current, iin stores energy in the input inductor, Lin, as illustrated in Figure 3.10. This interval ends when the resonant current iLr is zero. The input current iin, the resonant current iLr and the voltage across the resonant capacitor vCr are given by (3-5)-(3-7), respectively. 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡) =𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡 − 𝑡0) + 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡0) (3-5) 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) = − 𝑖𝐶𝑟(𝑡) =𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)𝑍 sin(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡0)) (3-6) 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)[cos(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡0)) − 1] + 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡0) (3-7) where, 𝑍 = √𝐿𝑟/𝐶𝑟 and 𝜔𝑟 = 1/√𝐿𝑟𝐶𝑟. 34 S1S2iinvs1is1vs2is2Vo +VCr(max.)Iin(max.)Iin(max.)vLry=-sinx, x∊[0,2π]iLrvCrVCr(max.)iCrt0 t1 t2 t3vD1iD1VovD2iD2VoResonant Operation PWM Operation Figure 3.9 Proposed HRPWM converter waveforms in CCM. D4D3ViniinLinS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1D1D2Lr RoCo VoCr Figure 3.10 HRPWM bridgeless topology conduction path during Interval-1. 35 Interval-2(t1-t2): This interval starts when D2 stops conducting and there is no current in the resonant branch. The inductor, Lin continues to store energy similar to traditional boost operation, as illustrated in Figure 3.11. This interval ends when S1 and S2 are turned off. D4D3ViniinLinD1D2Lr RoCo VoCrCs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1S2 Figure 3.11 HRPWM bridgeless topology conduction path during Interval-2. Interval-3(t2-t3): In this interval, the energy stored in the input inductor Lin is transferred to the load, as illustrated in Figure 3.12. This interval ends when S1 and S2 are turned on at t3/t0 and interval-1 starts. The input current iin is given by (3-8). 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡) =𝑉𝑖𝑛 − 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛) − 𝑉0𝐿𝑖𝑛 (𝑡 − 𝑡2) + 𝑖𝑖𝑛 (𝑡2) (3-8) D4D3S2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1iinVin LinD1RoCo VoD2LrCr Figure 3.12 HRPWM bridgeless topology conduction path during Interval-3. 36 3.4 Operation during Startup and In-rush Considerations Figure 3.13 illustrates the proposed converter’s operation during startup. It can be seen that, unlike the conventional boost converter, the input current of the proposed converter flows through the resonant capacitor, Cr and the bus capacitor, Co when the PWM switches are not activated. For Co >> Cr, the equivalent circuit after the initial application of power is provided in Figure 3.14. D4D3S2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1iinVin LinD1RoCoD2LrCr Figure 3.13 Inrush current path for positive line cycle. RoCrVin LinD1D3 Figure 3.14 Equivalent circuit during startup neglecting the low impedance of Co. The worst-case inrush current equation (3-9) is determined using the following conditions: high line input voltage connection to the PFC converter at a phase angle corresponding to the highest peak; Cr << Co; ideal Lin and Cr; no initial currents in Lin or voltages on Cr and Co; and assuming no source impedances or converter resistances. 37 𝑖𝑖𝑛𝑟𝑢𝑠ℎ(𝑡) = √2 𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑎𝑥)√𝐶𝑟𝐿𝑖𝑛sin 𝜔𝑡 (3-9) where, 𝜔 = 1/√𝐿𝑖𝑛𝐶𝑟 3.5 Analysis and Design In this section, key design equations, including the converter DC conversion ratio and current and voltage stresses are provided in addition to a design example. 3.5.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio The DC voltage-conversion ratio is the same as a boost converter at normal operating condition and is given by (3-10). Hence, standard duty cycle control can be used for this converter. 𝑉𝑜𝑉𝑖𝑛=11 − 𝐷 (3-10) 3.5.2 Voltage Stress Analysis A stress analysis was performed on the proposed converter. The voltage stress on the resonant components and the diodes is the output voltage, Vo. The voltage stress on MOSFETs, S1 and S2 is given by (3-11). 𝑉𝑆1_𝑆2(𝑚𝑎𝑥) = 𝑉𝑜 + 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥) (3-11) In steady-state, the average load current equals the average current in diodes D1 and D2. Thus, the average load current is given by (3-12). 𝐼𝐷2(𝑎𝑣𝑔) = [1𝑇𝑠∫ 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)√𝐶𝑟𝐿𝑟𝑇𝑟 2⁄0 sin(𝜔𝑟𝑡)𝑑𝑡] (3-12) Using (3-12), VCr(max) is given by (3-13). 38 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥) =𝐼𝑜2𝐶𝑟𝑓𝑠 (3-13) 3.5.3 Design Example A design example is provided to determine the optimal resonant frequency of the resonant tank, Lr-Cr. The example specifications are listed in Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Design specifications Table Parameter Value Input voltage range, Vin 85-265 V Nominal input voltage, Vin(nom) 180 V Switching frequency, fs 70 kHz Rated output power, Po 650 W Output Voltage, Vo 400 V In order to reduce the turn-off losses of the PFC MOSFETs, below-resonance operation has been selected and from (3-4) and (3-10) the optimal resonant frequency is 64 kHz calculated using (3-14). 𝑓𝑟 ≥𝑓𝑠𝑉𝑜2(𝑉𝑜 − 𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑛𝑜𝑚)) (3-14) Using (3-13) and setting VCr(max) to 25 V, Cr is given by (3-15). 𝐶𝑟 =𝐼𝑜2𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)𝑓𝑠 (3-15) Therefore, an off-the-shelf 1 µF capacitor was selected using (3-15). The resonant inductance, Lr is given by (3-16) and is calculated using (3-2). 39 𝐿𝑟 =14𝜋2𝑓𝑟2𝐶𝑟 (3-16) Therefore, a 6 µH inductor was selected. To ensure inherent inrush current and energy limiting, all the components in the inrush current path need to sustain the peak inrush current, which can be calculated using (3-9) to be 18.74 A as given by (3-17). 𝑖𝑖𝑛𝑟𝑢𝑠ℎ(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘) = √2 𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑎𝑥)√𝐶𝑟𝐿𝑖𝑛= 18.74 𝐴 (3-17) The energy limit associated with peak inrush current is calculated as 0.022 A2s as given by (3-18). 𝐼𝑖𝑛𝑟𝑢𝑠ℎ2 (𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘)𝑇𝑟 = (√2 𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑎𝑥)√𝐶𝑟𝐿𝑖𝑛)2𝜋 √𝐿𝑖𝑛𝐶𝑟 = 0.022 𝐴2𝑠 (3-18) When provided in the datasheets, the peak current, peak voltage and energy limits of the devices in the inrush current path are provided in Table 3.2. It can be seen that the peak current and energy limits of the devices are far beyond the worst-case surge currents and energies calculated in (3-17) and (3-18), respectively. 3.6 Experimental Results An experimental prototype was built to verify the operation of the proposed converter. A complete schematic is provided in Figure A- 2 in the Appendix. A photo of the prototype is provided in Figure 3.15. The converter was designed according to the parameters listed in Table I using average current mode control. The key components specified in Table 3.2 were used. 40 Figure 3.15 Proposed converter experimental prototype. Table 3.2 List of key converter components Component Part Number Peak current limit I2T or energy limit Peak voltage limit S1, S2 IPP65R110CFD 100 A N/A 650 V D1, D2 IDH08G65C5 >60 A 18 A2s 650 V D3, D4 GBJ1506 240 A 240 A2s 600 V Co 450TXW150MEFC(2 in parallel) N/A N/A 450 V Cr ECW-F2225JA (2 in series) N/A N/A 500 V Lr 6 µH N/A N/A N/A Lin 370 µH N/A N/A N/A Gate Driver IRS2113 N/A N/A N/A 41 The experimental input voltage, input current and output voltage waveforms for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 3.16. Test conditions were as follows: Vin= 120 V, Vo= 400 V, Po= 650 W, fs= 70 kHz. The input current is in phase with the input voltage, and its shape is close to a sinusoidal waveform, as expected. Waveforms of the voltage across switch S1, VS1 and the gating signal for S1, Vg are provided in Figure 3.17 for positive line cycle operation when S1 is working as a PWM switch. The voltage across the switch is nominally the output voltage, Vo (e.g. 400 V) plus the relatively small ripple voltage (e.g. 25 V) across Cr. Input Voltage, VinInput Current, IinOutput Voltage, Vo Figure 3.16 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of input voltage, Vin (ch3: 50 V/div), input current, Iin (ch 1: 10 A/div) and output voltage, Vo (ch2: 200 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. 42 Gatesignal, VgSwitch voltage, Vs1 Figure 3.17 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across switch S1, VS1 (ch2: 100 V/div) and gating signal for S1, Vg (ch3: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. Waveforms of the voltage across the resonant capacitor Cr, VCr and the current through the resonant inductor Lr, ILr are provided in Figure 3.18. During the resonant period, the resonant capacitor discharges in a sinusoidal resonant fashion and during PWM operation, the resonant capacitor charges linearly. Figure 3.19 shows the measured inrush current of a conventional boost converter without additional inrush current limiting circuitry. The peak inrush current was expected to exceed 300 A; however, limitations in the electronic AC source and measurement equipment prevented capturing the real world worst case inrush current. 43 Voltage, VCrCurrent, ILr Figure 3.18 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 3: 20 V/div) and current through inductor Lr, ILr (ch 4: 10 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. VinIinrush375 VOver 50 A Figure 3.19 Conventional boost converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of inrush current, Iinrush (ch 1:5A/div), and input voltage, Vin (ch 4:200V/div) at Vin = 265V, Vo = 0 V. The inrush current of the proposed HRPWM converter was recorded as 5.2 A, with a pulse width of 800 μs, corresponding to a I2T of 0.021 A2s, as illustrated in Figure 3.20. The measured shape and period of the surge current differs from the predicted worst case due to several factors: most importantly source impedances, dv/dt and fast current-limiting of the electronic AC source, and the many complex impedances 44 in the EMI filter. However, the inrush energy matches closely with the predicted value. Hence, the proposed converter can be utilized without any extra inrush current protection circuit. On the other hand, with identical circuit parameters, the inrush current of a conventional boost converter without additional inrush current-limiting circuitry would exceed 300 A. Therefore, a conventional boost converter requires inrush current-limiting circuitry, which adds cost and complexity. 375 VIinrush5.25 AVin Figure 3.20 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of inrush current, Iinrush (ch 1:1A/div), and input voltage, Vin (ch 4:200V/div) at Vin = 265V, Vo = 0 V. Figure 3.21 shows the result of increasing AC input voltage from 265 V to 320 V for the conventional boost converter. When this happens the converter’s controller disables switching, but it is clear that the converter output voltage rises to the peak of the AC input (~460 V peak). The converters output is connected to the DC bus capacitance and downstream components. Hence, it is necessary to use higher voltage rated bus capacitors. Figure 3.22 shows the result of increasing the AC input voltage from 265 V to 320 V for the proposed HRPWM prototype converter. As with the boost converter, the controller disables switching when the AC input voltage becomes excessive; however, the peak rectified AC input appears 45 across the resonant capacitor, Cr and does not pass to the converters output. As a result the voltage stress on the bus capacitor of the proposed converter is lower than conventional boost converter. VinVoVs Figure 3.21 Conventional boost converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of withstand input voltage, Vin (ch1: 200 V/div), voltage across boost switch, Vs (ch 2: 200 V/div) and output voltage, Vo (ch4: 100 V/div). VinVoVs1 VCr Figure 3.22 Proposed converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of withstand input voltage, Vin (ch1: 200 V/div), voltage across boost switch, Vs1 (ch 2: 200 V/div), voltage across resonant capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 3: 100 V/div) and output voltage, Vo (ch4: 100 V/div). 46 As a evidence of the heat spreading features of the proposed converter, thermal images of the diode bridge for both the conventional boost PFC converter and the proposed converter are provided in Figure 3.23 and Figure 3.24, respectively. It is observed that the maximum temperature of the diode bridge of the boost PFC converter is 88.8o C compared to 64.9o C for the proposed converter. Figure 3.23 Thermal image of diode bridge rectifier of boost PFC converter at 650W. Figure 3.24 Thermal image of diode bridge rectifier of proposed converter at 650W. 47 Curves of the measured converter efficiency versus output power at 120 V, 220 V and 240 V input are provided in Figure 3.25. The proposed converter achieves high efficiency over the entire load range. A peak efficiency of 97.5% was measured at 240 V input and 205 W load. Figure 3.25 Proposed HRPWM converter measured efficiency as a function of output power at fs =70 kHz. Curves of the measured converter power factor versus output power at 120 V, 220 V and 240 V input are provided in Figure 3.26. The power factor is greater than 0.98 from 50% load to full load. 95.596.096.597.097.598.00 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Efficiency (%)Output Power (W)Vin= 120 VVin= 220 VVin= 240 V 48 Figure 3.26 Proposed HRPWM converter power factor as a function of output power at fS =70 kHz. In order to verify the quality of the input current in the proposed topology, its harmonics up to the 39th harmonic are given and compared with the EN 61000-3-2 standard in Figure 3.27 for 120 V and 240 V input. All converter harmonics are well below IEC standard. Figure 3.27 Input current harmonics at Vin = 120 V and 240 V at full load condition for proposed converter. 3.7 Summary This chapter presented a new HRPWM PFC converter. The limitations of boost derived PFC converters, in particular, high in-rush current and lack of lightning and surge protection, were discussed, 0.840.860.880.900.920.940.960.981.000 100 200 300 400 500 600 700Power factorOutput Power (W)Vin= 120 VVin= 220 VVin= 240 V0.00.51.01.52.02.53 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39Harmonic Current (A)Harmonics OrderEN 61000-3-2 Class A Limits (A)Amplitude (A) Vin = 120VAmplitude (A) Vin = 240V 49 which further motivated the necessity of a PFC converter with inherent inrush limiting capability. A detailed explanation of the proposed converter operating principles and modes of operation was presented. A step-by-step design procedure was described. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed converter inherently limits the in-rush current and has the capability to withstand sustained over voltage conditions. The converter power factor and efficiency measurements were provided as a function of load power at 120V, 220V and 240V input. The power factor is greater than 0.97 from half load to full load. The proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency of 97.5% at 240 V input and 200 W output power. 50 4 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter* 4.1 Overview In Chapter 3, a HRPWM PFC converter was proposed. This converter operates with hard-switching, meaning that there is simultaneous presence of voltage across the MOSFET and current through it during switching, so power is dissipated within the device during the switching transition. This chapter presents a new soft-switching HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter which also has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. The purpose of soft-switching techniques is to decrease, or eliminate the simultaneous presence of voltage and current through the power device during switching. Unlike the conventional boost or bridgeless boost converters, the proposed converter minimizes switching losses by achieving ZVS for all switches. Moreover, ZCS is achieved for the output rectifier diodes, which reduces the reverse recovery losses. The proposed converter also realizes bridgeless converter operation, eliminating the heat management issues in diode bridge rectifier required with the conventional boost converter. Unlike the totem-pole converter, the proposed converter can be driven with the same PWM signal and it doesn’t require sensing both the positive and negative AC line cycle operation, enabling simplified control. The resonant components used in the proposed converter are relatively small in size compared with the size of the passive elements in the Cuk and SEPIC converters. The proposed converter can operate at high switching frequency without the undesirable voltage spike across the PWM switches in the resonant topology in [38]. The proposed soft-switching bridgeless AC-DC PFC converter topology is illustrated in Figure 4.1. * The content of this chapter has been published and is in press in the following conference proceeding and journal, respectively: [1] M. Alam, W. Eberle, D. Gautam and F. Musavi, " A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter for Off-Road and Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Battery Charging," in Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf., Mar. 2014, pp. 103-108. [2] M. Alam, W. Eberle, D. Gautam and C. Botting, “A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter” in press, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2632100. 51 vin RoCoiiniS1D3 S1LinD4CaS2iD1D2vD2iD2LrCriLrvLrvCr D1vD1+-+-+ -iSaiS2vS1+-vS2+-Sa vSa+-+-+- Figure 4.1 Proposed soft-switching bridgeless AC-DC PFC converter topology. Section 4.2 presents the modes of operation of the proposed converter. In Section 4.3, a detailed analysis and a design example for the proposed converter is presented along with a loss analysis. Finally, Section 4.4 provides the experimental results, showing the soft-switching operation. The chapter summary is presented in Section 4.5. 4.2 Modes of Operation In the paragraphs that follow, the operation of the proposed converter is explained in detail and a mathematical analysis of its steady-state operation is provided. This converter operates in hybrid-resonant mode when the switches are on and PWM mode when the switches are off. Both modes occur during a single switching cycle. In the resonant mode, inductor Lr and capacitor Cr resonate. The resonant frequency has a significant impact on the operation of the converter, and can be higher, lower or equal to the switching frequency. As discussed in section 3.2 that the below resonance operation is preferred to reduce switching losses so the following discussion refers to below resonance operation. The key waveforms for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 4.2. For simplicity, the discussion that follows refers only to the low frequency positive AC half-line cycle operation over one high frequency switching cycle. 52 vgs_Savgs_S1/S2 iinvS1iS1vS2iS2Iin(max.)Iin(max.)t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t6 t7t5vD1iD1VovD2iD2VovCry=-sinx, x∊[0,2π]iLr IinvLrvSaiSaVCr(max)VCr(min) Figure 4.2 Proposed soft-switching HRPWM converter waveforms in CCM. Interval-1(t0-t1): The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 4.3(a). This interval starts when the output capacitor Cs1 of switch S1 is fully discharged and the output capacitor Csa of switch Sa is fully charged (i.e. the end of interval-7). The switch current of S1 is clamped by the body diode Ds1 to initiate ZVS turn-on of switch S1. The gating signal vgs_S1/S2 enables ZVS turn-on for both S1 and S2. The input current iin and the resonant current iLr are given by (4-1) and (4-2), respectively. 53 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡) =𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡 − 𝑡0) + 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡0) (4-1) 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) =𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛)− 𝑉𝑜𝐿𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡0) + 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡0) (4-2) Interval-2(t1-t2): The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 4.3(b). During this interval the switch current is1 follows the resonant current iLr, and is the sum of the input current iin and resonant current iLr. The input current iin stores energy in the input inductor Lin. This mode ends when the resonant current iLr is zero, which enables D2 to turn-off with ZCS. The resonant current iLr and the voltage across the resonant capacitor vCr are given by (4-3) and (4-4), respectively. 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) = − 𝑖𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛)𝑍sin (𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡1) (4-3) 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛)[cos(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡1)) − 1] + 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡1) (4-4) where 𝑍 = √(𝐿𝑟/𝐶𝑟) and 𝜔𝑟 = 1/√(𝐿𝑟𝐶𝑟) Interval-3(t2-t3): The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 4.3(c). This interval starts when D2 stops conducting, and there is no current in the resonant branch. In this interval the input inductor Lin stores energy, similar to traditional boost operation. This interval ends when switch S1 is turned off. Interval-4(t3-t4): The equivalent circuits are provided in Figure 4.3(d) and Figure 4.3(e). At t = t3, the switch S1 is turned off. The input current iin charges the output capacitor Cs1 of switch S1, and discharges the output capacitor Csa of switch Sa (Figure 4.3(d)). The switch current of Sa is then clamped by the body diode Dsa with the equivalent circuit provided in Figure 4.3(e). The input current iin, resonant current iLr, and voltage across the resonant capacitor vCr, are given by (4-5), (4-6) and (4-7), respectively. 54 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡) =𝑉𝑖𝑛 − 𝑉𝐶𝑎𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡 − 𝑡3) + 𝑖𝑖𝑛(𝑡3) (4-5) 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) = − 𝑖𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)𝑍sin (𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡3)) (4-6) 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)[cos(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡3)) − 1] + 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡3) (4-7) where 𝑍 = √(𝐿𝑟/𝐶𝑟) and 𝜔𝑟 = 1/√(𝐿𝑟𝐶𝑟) Interval-5(t4-t5): The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 4.3(f). In this interval the gating signal vgs_Sa enables ZVS turn-on for switch Sa after Dsa begins conducting in the previous interval. Interval-6(t5-t6): The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 4.3(g). This interval starts when iLr equals iin, and the current through switch Sa starts flowing from its drain to source. Hence, the current through switch Sa changes its direction. This mode ends when switch Sa is turned off. Interval-7 (t6-t7): The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 4.3(h). During this interval the input current iin charges capacitor Csa, and discharges capacitor Cs1. The current through switch S1 is clamped by the body diode Ds1 in the next interval, interval-1. 55 VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (a) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (b) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (c) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (d) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSa DsaCsaVo (e) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (f) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (g) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1CaSaDsaCsaVo (h) Figure 4.3 Proposed converter modes of operation. 56 4.3 Analysis and Design 4.3.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio In steady state, the DC voltage conversion ratio of the proposed converter can be found using average voltages. In one switching period, the net volt-second product across Lin and Lr is equal to zero, i.e. VLin(avg) = VLr(avg) = 0 V. Therefore, the average switch voltages, Vs1 and Vs2 are equal to the input voltage, Vin. When the switch S1 is on, the switch voltage Vs1 is zero and when switch S1 is off, the switch voltage, Vs1 is VCr+VD2, since VLr = 0 V. Accordingly, when switch S1 is on, the diode D2 conducts the resonant current, thus VD2 = 0 V, and when switch S1 is off it blocks the output voltage Vo. Hence, the volt-second balance is given by (4-8). 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝑇𝑠 = (𝑉𝑜 + 𝑉𝐶𝑟)(1 − 𝐷)𝑇𝑠 (4-8) Since during the on-time interval only the voltage VCr is applied to the inductor Lr, the average voltage VCr must be zero. Therefore, using (4-8) with VCr = 0, the DC voltage conversion ratio is given by (4-9), which is the same conversion ratio as the boost converter. 𝑉𝑜𝑉𝑖𝑛=11 − 𝐷 (4-9) 4.3.2 Voltage Stress Analysis The maximum voltage stress on switches S1 and S2 is the output voltage plus the peak resonant capacitor voltage, as given by (4-10). 𝑉𝑆1_𝑆2(𝑚𝑎𝑥) = 𝑉𝑜 + 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥) (4-10) In steady-state, the average load current can be obtained from interval-2 and interval-4 and is given by (4-11). 57 𝐼𝐷2(𝑎𝑣𝑔) =𝑉𝑜𝑅𝑜= [1𝑇𝑠∫ 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥)√𝐶𝑟𝐿𝑟𝑇𝑟2⁄0 sin(𝜔𝑟𝑡). 𝑑𝑡] (4-11) Using (4-11), VCr(max) is given by (4-12). 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥) =𝐼𝑜2𝐶𝑟𝑓𝑠 (4-12) 4.3.3 ZVS Condition for the Switches To achieve ZVS for S1, it must be turned on during interval-1 (t0-t1). The current required to achieve ZVS for the PWM switches is determined by the difference between iin and iLr at t0, as given by (4-13). 𝐼𝑠1−𝑆2(𝑍𝑉𝑆) = 𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘) − 𝐼𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑖𝑛) =𝑇𝑠𝐼𝑜𝜔𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝜔𝑟(1 − 𝐷)𝑇𝑠)2−𝑃𝑜𝑉𝑖𝑛+𝐷𝑇𝑠𝑉𝑖𝑛2𝐿𝑖𝑛 (4-13) Rearranging, (4-13) can be expressed as (4-14). 𝐼𝑠1−𝑆2(𝑍𝑉𝑆) =𝐿𝑖𝑛[𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐼𝑜𝑇𝑠𝜔𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝜔𝑟(1 − 𝐷)𝑇𝑠) − 2𝑃𝑜] + 𝐷𝑇𝑠𝑉𝑖𝑛22𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐿𝑖𝑛 (4-14) In addition to the timing requirement, there must also be sufficient energy stored in the resonant inductor Lr to completely discharge Cs1. To ensure ZVS turn-on of the PWM switches S1 and S2, the condition in (4-15) must be satisfied. 12 𝐿𝑟 𝐼𝑠1−𝑆2(𝑍𝑉𝑆)2 ≥12(𝐶𝑠1 + 𝐶𝑠𝑎) (𝑉𝑖𝑛1 − 𝐷)2 (4-15) In (4-15), Cs1 and Csa are the output capacitances of S1 and Sa, respectively. The ZVS condition for the auxiliary switch Sa is achieved when the PWM switches are turned off at t3. The current in the auxiliary switch is the peak input current, which is given by (4-16). 58 𝐼𝑠𝑎(𝑍𝑉𝑆) = 𝐼𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑎𝑥) =2𝑃𝑜𝐿𝑖𝑛 + 𝐷𝑇𝑠𝑉𝑖𝑛22 (4-16) At t3, there must also be sufficient energy stored in inductor Lin to completely discharge the switch capacitance Csa. Hence, to ensure ZVS turn-on of Sa, (4-17) must be satisfied. 12 𝐿𝑖𝑛 𝐼𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑎𝑥)2 ≥12(𝐶𝑠1 + 𝐶𝑠𝑎) (𝑉𝑖𝑛1 − 𝐷)2 (4-17) 4.3.4 Design Methodology A design example is provided to determine the input inductor Lin, the optimal resonant frequency fr, the resonant inductor Lr, the resonant capacitor Cr and the clamping capacitor Ca. The example specifications are listed in Table 4.1. The input voltage range is the universal AC line voltage of 85 V to 265 V, which includes a 10 % tolerance for the nominal values. Table 4.1 Design Specifications Parameter Value Input voltage range, Vin 85 - 265 Vac Input current ripple, I%Ripple 25% Switching frequency, fs 150 kHz Rated output power, Po 650 W Output Voltage, Vo 400 Vdc Using the design specifications, the input inductor, Lin is calculated using (4-18). 𝐿𝑖𝑛 =𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑖𝑛)2𝐼%𝑅𝑖𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑠 𝑃𝑜 (1 − √2 𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑖𝑛) 𝑉𝑜) = 207 𝜇𝐻 (4-18) 59 In order to calculate the resonant frequency, the condition in below-resonance operation is used to reduce the turn-off losses of the PFC switches. Hence, using (3-4) and (4-9), where Tr = 1/fr and Ton = D/fs, the minimum resonant frequency is fr = 107 kHz. The resonant inductor value is determined using (4-15) as Lr = 10 µH to maintain ZVS. Using (3-2), the resonant capacitor value is calculated to be Cr = 0.25 µF. The value of clamp capacitor Ca is chosen based on the design of Lr and Cr. The resonant frequency formed by the clamp capacitor and the resonant capacitor with resonant inductor should be sufficiently low so that there is not excessive resonant ringing across the PWM switch when it is turned off. However, using too large a value of Ca yields no improvement in clamping performance at the expense of a larger (more costly and bulky) capacitor. A good compromise for design purposes is to select the capacitor value so that one-half of the resonant period formed by the clamp capacitor and the resonant capacitor with resonant inductor exceeds the maximum off time of PWM switch, as given by (4-15). Therefore an off-the-shelf 5 µF capacitor was selected using (4-19). 𝐶𝑎 ≫(1 − 𝐷)2𝜋2𝐿𝑟𝑓𝑠2 − 𝐶𝑟 (4-19) 4.3.5 Converter Loss Analysis A detailed engineering loss analysis was performed using standard analytical techniques and PSIM simulation results (to model conduction losses) for the benchmark AC-DC boost converter and the proposed HRPWM ZVS converter. The estimated loss distribution is provided in Figure 4.4 at 150 kHz switching frequency, 100 V input and 650 W load. The low line 100 V input operating point was chosen since semiconductor conduction losses are highest at this point, therefore it is the point used to size heatsinks. 60 Figure 4.4 Loss distribution comparison at Vin = 100 V, fs = 150 kHz, Po = 650 W, Vo = 400 V. Total losses in the converter are estimated to be reduced by 6.9 W (55.7 W – 48.8 W) compared to the benchmark boost PFC. The proposed converter reduces switching losses by 16.8 W (26 W – 9.2 W). In addition to the cost of the additional circuit components, the performance penalty for adding the auxiliary components includes increased circulating currents, resulting increased conduction losses by 10 W (14 W – 4 W). However, given the reduction in frequency dependent losses, the increased conduction losses are more than offset (i.e. by 6.8 W). Compared to the conventional boost PFC converter, one of the main benefits of the proposed converter is improved heat distribution, since the most lossy components (i.e. the PFC MOSFETs and bridge diodes) will run cooler due to lower losses. It is noted that these results are at 150 kHz switching frequency. At higher frequencies, the loss reduction would be more substantial. The 4.026.016.50.03.30.02.9 3.055.714.09.2 8.13.55.22.9 2.9 3.048.80.010.020.030.040.050.060.0Power Losses [W]Boost PFC at Vin = 100 VZVS HRPWM PFC at Vin = 100 V 61 experimental results presented in the next section verify the analysis results and the primary conclusion related to reduced losses in the PFC MOSFETs and bridge diodes. 4.4 Experimental Results Experimental prototypes of the proposed ZVS HRPWM converter and the conventional boost PFC converter were built to verify and compare the feasibility of the converter. A complete schematic of the proposed converter and the conventional boost PFC converter are provided in Figure A- 3 and Figure A- 1 respectively in the Appendix. A photo of the proposed experimental prototype is provided in Figure 4.5. The converter was designed to operate at up to 650 W output power according to the parameters listed in Table 4.1. Standard average current mode control was used. The key components of the proposed converter and the conventional PFC boost converter are provided in Table 4.2 and Table 4.3, respectively. Figure 4.5 Proposed converter experimental prototype. 62 Table 4.2 Key components for the HRPWM converter. Component Device Description S1, S2, Sa IPP65R099C6 D1, D2 STTH8R06D D3, D4 GBJ2506 Lin 250 µH Lr 10 µH Cr 0.27 µF, ECW Series Ca 5 µF, B32674 Series Table 4.3 Key components for the conventional boost PFC converter. Component Device Description PFC switch IPP65R099C6 (2 in parallel) PFC diode STTH8R06D Diode bridge GBJ2506 PFC inductor 250 µH The experimental input voltage, input current, and output voltage waveforms for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 4.6. Test conditions were as follows: Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W, fs = 150 kHz. The input current is in phase with the input voltage, and its shape is close to a sinusoidal waveform, as expected. 63 VoVinIin Figure 4.6 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 20ms/div of input voltage Vin (ch3: 100 V/div), input current Iin (ch2: 10 A/div) and output voltage Vo (ch1: 100 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Waveforms for the ZVS transition during turn-on for S1 are provided in Figure 4.7 for positive line cycle operation, when S1 is working as a PWM switch. According to Figure 4.7, there is no Miller plateau region in the gate voltage waveform, which confirms ZVS for S1. ZVS occurs due to the negative current supplied by Lr, which discharges the body capacitance, Cs1, of S1 prior to applying the gate signal. Once the voltage across the MOSFET has become zero, the gate signal is applied to the MOSFET. Note that the voltage across the switch is nominally the output voltage Vo (400 V) plus the relatively small ripple voltage (50 V) across Cr. The waveforms of the ZVS transition during turn-on for S2 for negative line cycle operation are provided in Fig. 11 where S2 is working as a PWM switch. It can be observed from Figure 4.8 that S2 also achieves ZVS. 64 VdsVgsZVS turn-on Figure 4.7 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S1, Vds (ch2: 100 V/div) and gating signal for S1, Vgs (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. VdsVgsZVS turn-on Figure 4.8 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S2, Vds (ch3: 100 V/div) and gating signal for S2, Vgs (ch4: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Waveforms of the current through the resonant inductor ILr, voltage across the resonant capacitor VCr, input current Iin and the gating signal for S1 are provided in Figure 4.9. 65 VgsIinVCrILr Figure 4.9 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of voltage across capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 2: 100 V/div), current through inductor Lr, ILr (ch 4: 5 A/div), input current Iin (ch3: 5 A/div) and gating signal for S1, Vgs (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Waveforms of the resonant inductor current ILr, voltage across the resonant capacitor VCr and the gating signal for S1 near the peak of AC input voltage are provided in Figure 4.10. It can be observed that the current through Lr is negative when the Vgs is high. This negative current initiates the ZVS transition during the turn-on period of PWM switches S1 and S2. It can be seen that there is a voltage spike on VCr which is due to coupled noise from the experimental prototype (coupled via EMI) with the change of the drain to source voltages across S1 and S2. 66 VgsILrVCr Figure 4.10 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 2μs/div of voltage across capacitor Cr, VCr (ch 2: 100 V/div), current through inductor Lr, ILr (ch 4: 5 A/div) and gating signal for S1, Vgs (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Figure 4.11 and Figure 4.12 shows the waveforms of the current and voltage across D1 and D2, respectively. As shown in Figure 4.11 and Figure 4.12, the diode D1 and D2 are both turned off with ZCS. This happens due to the current flowing through Lr when the diodes are turned off. This way it can reduce some switching losses and switching noise. ZCS turn-offID1VD1 Figure 4.11 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 500ns/div of voltage across diode D1, VD1 (ch 2: 200 V/div) and current through diode D1, ID1 (ch 3: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. 67 ZCS turn-offID2VD2 Figure 4.12 ZVS HRPWM converter experimental waveforms at 500ns/div of voltage across diode D2, VD2 (ch 2: 100 V/div) and current through diode D2, ID2 (ch 3: 2 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Curves of the measured converter efficiency versus output power at 100 V and 240 V input are provided in Figure 4.13. Total loss curves are provided in Figure 4.14 at 100 V input for the ZVS HRPWM and conventional boost PFC converter. The proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency of 96.95 % at 240 V input and 650 W load. The proposed converter maintains greater efficiency and lower power loss across the entire load range, and most notably at low input line operation, where the thermal stresses are maximum. Furthermore, the efficiency improvement at full load is 1 percentage point, representing a total power loss savings of 7 W. Note that the loss savings of 7 W is very close to the 6.9 W predicted in section 4.3.5. The improvement in the efficiency can be attributed to the fact that the proposed converter eliminates, or minimizes three major sources of losses compared with the conventional boost - these are the conduction losses in the diode bridge rectifier, the turn-on losses of the PFC switches and the reverse recovery losses of the output diodes. As further evidence of the loss reduction and heat spreading features of the proposed converter, thermal images of the PFC MOSFETs and the diode bridge for both the conventional boost PFC converter and the proposed soft-switching converter are provided in Figure 4.15 and Figure 4.16. It is observed that the maximum temperature of the diode bridge of the boost PFC converter is 88.8o C compared 68 to 64.9o C for the proposed converter. Similarly, the PFC MOSFETs of the proposed converter operate cooler (i.e. max 93.4o C) compared with the PFC boost MOSFETs (i.e. max 105o C), showing the advantage of ZVS operation. Figure 4.13 Efficiency as a function of load at Vin = 100 V and 240 V, Vo = 400 V and fs = 150 kHz for the ZVS HRPWM and boost PFC converters. Figure 4.14 Total loss as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V and fs = 150 kHz for the ZVS HRPWM and boost PFC converters. 899091929394959697100 300 500 700Efficiency [%]Output Power [W]ZVS HRPWM (VIN=240V)Boost (VIN=240V)ZVS HRPWM (VIN=100V)Boost (VIN=100V)1015202530354045505560100 300 500 700Total Loss [W]Output Power [W]ZVS HRPWM (VIN=100V)Boost (VIN=100V) 69 (a) (b) Figure 4.15 Thermal images of diode bridge rectifier: (a) boost PFC converter, and (b) ZVS HRPWM converter. (a) (b) Figure 4.16 Thermal images of PFC MOSFETs: (a) boost PFC converter, and (b) ZVS HRPWM converter. Curves of the measured converter power factor versus output power for the proposed ZVS HRPWM converter are provided in Figure 4.17 at 100V and 240V input, respectively. It can be observed that the power factor is greater than 0.98 from half load to full load. 70 Figure 4.17 Power factor as a function of load at Vin = 100 V and 240 V, Vo = 400 V for proposed ZVS HRPWM converter. In order to verify the quality of the input current in the proposed topology, its harmonics up to the 39th harmonic are given and compared with the EN 61000-3-2 standard in Figure 4.18 for 100 V and 240 V input. All converter harmonics are well below IEC standard. Figure 4.18 Input current harmonics at Vin = 100 V and 240 V at full load condition for proposed ZVS HRPWM converter. 0.90.920.940.960.981100 300 500 700Power FactorOutput Power [W]ZVS HRPWM (VIN=100V)ZVS HRPWM (VIN=240V)0.00.51.01.52.02.53 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39Harmonic Current (A)Harmonics OrderEN 61000-3-2 Class A Limits (A)Amplitude (A) Vin = 100VAmplitude (A) Vin = 240V 71 4.5 Summary This chapter presented a new soft-switching AC-DC PFC converter. The proposed converter has many advantages for practical implementation. This converter has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities and can be easily implemented with standard average current mode control and the PWM switches can be driven with the same PWM signal, so extra circuitry is not required to sense both the positive, or and negative line-cycle operation. Moreover, the bridgeless operation eliminates the problem with heat management in a traditional diode rectifier preceding a boost PFC converter. The proposed converter reduces switching losses by realizing ZVS for the two PFC MOSFETs and one auxiliary MOSFET, and ZCS for the output rectifier diodes. An experimental prototype was been built to verify the proof-of-concept and the key experimental waveforms were provided. The converter power factor and efficiency measurements were provided as a function of load power at 100V and 240V input. The power factor is greater than 0.98 from half load to full load. The proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency of 96.95% at 240 V input and 650 W output power. Compared to the conventional hard-switched PFC boost converter at the maximum loss operating point (full load and 100 V AC input), the proposed converter achieves 1 percentage point efficiency improvement and operates with lower semiconductor device temperatures. 72 5 A High Voltage Gain Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter‡ 5.1 Overview In Chapter 4, a soft-switching AC-DC PFC converter was proposed and analyzed. In this converter, the voltage stress on the diodes is equal to the output voltage. In this chapter, a high voltage gain soft-switching AC-DC PFC converter is proposed which also has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. Unlike the converters presented in Chapters 3 and 4 and conventional boost and bridgeless boost converters, the switching transitions of the proposed converter in this Chapter occur with a voltage level equivalent to half of the output voltage, which reduces switching losses. With reduced voltage stress, a low voltage drop fast recovery silicon diode can also be used. Moreover, this converter nearly eliminates turn-on switching losses by achieving ZVS for all switches and ZCS at turn-off for the output rectifier diodes, which nearly eliminates reverse recovery losses. The proposed converter is also bridgeless, which eliminates the heat management issues in diode bridge rectifier. The proposed soft-switching bridgeless AC-DC PFC converter topology is illustrated in Figure 5.1. vinRoCo1D3 S1LinD4 S2D2LrCrD1SaCo2iD2vD2+-iD1vD1 +-vS2+-vS1+-iS1iS2vCr+-vLr+ -iLriSaiin vSa+-+- Figure 5.1 Proposed soft-switching bridgeless AC-DC PFC converter topology. ‡ The content of this chapter has been submitted to the following journal: [1] M. Alam, W. Eberle, D. Gautam and C. Botting, “A High Voltage Gain Single-Phase Soft-Switching Bridgeless Power Factor Correction Rectifier” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 73 Section 5.2 provides the modes of operation of the proposed converter and the detailed operating conditions for soft-switching are presented. In Section 5.3, a detailed analysis and a design example of the proposed converter is presented along with a converter loss analysis. Finally, Section 5.4 provides experimental results showing soft-switching operation. A summary is provided in Section 5.5 5.2 Modes of Operation In the paragraphs that follow, the operation of the proposed converter is explained in detail and a mathematical analysis of its steady-state operation is provided. This converter operates in hybrid-resonant mode when the switches are on and PWM mode when the switches are off. Both modes occur during a single switching cycle. In the resonant mode, inductor Lr and capacitor Cr resonate. The resonant frequency has a significant impact on the operation of the converter, and can be higher, lower or equal to the switching frequency. As discussed in Chapter 3 section 3.2, below resonance operation is preferred to reduce switching losses so the following discussion assumes below resonance operation. The waveforms of the key components and the different modes of operation of the proposed converter are given in Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3, respectively. The modes of operation discussed below refer to the positive line cycle operation of the AC input. The below-resonance operation has five different modes of operation during one switching period and they are discussed as follows. 74 VgaVg iinvs1is1vs2is2Iin(max.)Iin(max.)y=-sinx, x∊[0,2π]iLr iinvLrvsaisavCrVCr(max)VCr(min)iD2t0 t1 t2 t3 t5t4vD1iD1vD2 Figure 5.2 Proposed soft-switching converter waveforms in CCM. Interval-1(t0-t1): This mode starts when switch Sa turns off. In order to achieve ZVS at turn-on for switch S1, capacitor Cs1 must be fully discharged. After discharge is complete, the current through switch S1 is clamped by body diode Ds1, and the gate pulse of switch S1 has to be applied before the current through switch S1 changes and starts charging Cs1. The gate signal Vg enables the soft transition condition for switch S1 and minimizes switching losses. During this interval the resonant current iLr and input current iLin linearly 75 decrease and increase, respectively, and are given by (5-1) and (5-2), respectively. The diodes D1 and D2 also realize ZCS turn-off and turn-on respectively. The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 5.3(a). 𝑖𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡) = 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡 − 𝑡0) + 𝑖𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡0) (5-1) 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) =𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛) − 𝑉0𝐿𝑟 (𝑡 − 𝑡0) + 𝑖𝐿𝑟 (𝑡0) (5-2) Interval-2(t1-t2): This interval begins with the resonance between Lr and Cr. The resonant current iLr continues to flow through switch S1 and the input current still increases linearly. Hence, the switch current iS1 during this interval is the summation of the input current iLin and the resonant current iLr. When the resonant current iLr is zero, it enables ZCS turn-off of diode D2. The current iLr and the voltage vCr of the resonant tank are given by (5-3) and (5-4), respectively. The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 5.3(b). 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) = −𝑖𝐶𝑟(𝑡) =𝑉𝑟1𝑍 sin(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡1)) (5-3) 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝑟1 [cos(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡1)) − 1] + 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡1) (5-4) where 𝑉𝑟1 = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛) − 𝑉𝐶2, 𝑍 = √(𝐿𝑟/𝐶𝑟) and 𝜔𝑟 = 1/√(𝐿𝑟 . 𝐶𝑟) Interval-3(t2-t3): This mode starts when the resonant current iLr is zero and the diode, D2 stops conducting. The input current iLin still increases linearly and stores energy in Lin. This interval ends when the gate signal Vg turns off switch S1. It should be noted that the turn-off current of switch S1 is the same as the turn-off current of the conventional PFC boost switch. The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 5.3(c). Interval-4(t3-t4): This interval starts when the switch S1 turns off. During this interval the capacitor Csa discharges to initiate the ZVS turn-on of switch Sa. The gate pulse of switch Sa has to be applied before the current through switch Sa reverses. The gate signal Vga enables the ZVS transition for switch Sa and minimizes the turn-on switching losses. The resonant operation between Lr and Cr is started and the input 76 current iLin, the resonant current iLr and the voltage vCr of the resonant tank are given by equations (5-5), (5-6) and (5-7), respectively. The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 5.3(d). 𝑖𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡) =𝑉𝑖𝑛 − 𝑉𝐶2𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡 − 𝑡3) + 𝑖𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡3) (5-5) 𝑖𝐿𝑟(𝑡) = − 𝑖𝐶𝑟(𝑡) =𝑉𝑟2𝑍 sin(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡3)) (5-6) 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡) = 𝑉𝑟2[cos(𝜔𝑟(𝑡 − 𝑡3)) − 1] + 𝑣𝐶𝑟(𝑡3) (5-7) where 𝑉𝑟2 = 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥) − 𝑉𝐶1, 𝑍 = √(𝐿𝑟/𝐶𝑟) and 𝜔𝑟 = 1/√(𝐿𝑟 . 𝐶𝑟) Interval-5(t4-t5): This mode starts when the current through switch Sa reverses and the input current iLin equals the resonant current iLr. Hence, the resonant current iLr during this interval is the summation of the input current iLin and the switch current of Sa. This interval ends when the gate signal Vga turns off switch Sa. The equivalent circuit is provided in Figure 5.3(e). 77 VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1SaDsaCsa RoCo1Co2 (a) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1SaDsaCsa RoCo1Co2 (b) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1SaDsaCsa RoCo1Co2 (c) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1SaDsaCsa RoCo1Co2 (d) VinD4D3D1D2LinCrLrS2Cs1Ds1Cs2Ds2S1SaDsaCsa RoCo1Co2 (e) Figure 5.3 Proposed converter modes of operation. 78 5.3 Analysis and Design 5.3.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio In steady state, it is assumed that the voltages across capacitors C1 and C2 are constant in a switching period. Thus the DC voltage conversion ratio can be calculated in a similar way as discussed in Chapter 4 section 4.3.1 and is given by (5-8). 𝑉𝑜 = 𝑉𝐶1 + 𝑉𝐶2 = 21 − 𝐷 𝑉𝑖𝑛 (5-8) where VC1 and VC2 are given by (5-9) and (5-10) respectively. 𝑉𝐶2 =11 − 𝐷 𝑉𝑖𝑛 (5-9) 𝑉𝐶1 =11 − 𝐷 𝑉𝑖𝑛 (5-10) In steady-state operation, the average load current can be found from interval-2, and is given by (5-11). 𝐼𝑜 =𝑉𝑜𝑅𝑜= [1𝑇𝑠∫ (𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛) − 𝑉𝐶2)√𝐶𝑟𝐿𝑟𝑇𝑟20 sin(𝜔𝑟𝑡)𝑑𝑡] (5-11) The minimum and maximum resonant capacitor voltage can be obtained from (5-11) and are given by (5-12) and (5-13) , respectively. 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑖𝑛) = 𝑉𝐶2 − 𝐼𝑜2𝐶𝑟𝑓𝑠 (5-12) 𝑉𝐶𝑟(𝑚𝑎𝑥) = 𝑉𝐶2 + 𝐼𝑜2𝐶𝑟𝑓𝑠 (5-13) 79 5.3.2 ZVS Requirements for the Switches In order to achieve ZVS for PFC switches S1 and S2, the gate signal Vg has to be applied when the switch Sa turns off during interval-1 at t0. The current required to achieve ZVS is determined by the difference between the input current iLin and the resonant current iLr. Hence, the ZVS current IS1_S2(ZVS) is given by (5-14). 𝐼𝑠1_𝑆2(𝑍𝑉𝑆) =𝐿𝑖𝑛[𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐼𝑜𝑇𝑠𝜔𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑛(𝜔𝑟(1 − 𝐷)𝑇𝑠) − 2𝑃𝑜] + 𝐷𝑇𝑠𝑉𝑖𝑛22𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐿𝑖𝑛 (5-14) The current required to achieve ZVS for switch Sa is determined by the maximum input current iLin when the PFC switches S1 and S2 are turned off during interval-5. Hence, this current, ISa(ZVS) is given by (5-15). 𝐼𝑠𝑎(𝑍𝑉𝑆) =2𝑃𝑜𝐿𝑖𝑛 + 𝐷𝑇𝑠𝑉𝑖𝑛22 (5-15) The energy stored in the resonant inductor Lr has to be sufficient to discharge the body capacitor Cs1 of switch S1 during interval-1 to initiate the ZVS condition. As a result the condition in (5-16) has to be satisfied in order to achieve ZVS for the PFC switches S1 and S2. 12 𝐿𝑟 𝐼𝑠1−𝑆2(𝑍𝑉𝑆)2 ≥12(𝐶𝑠1 + 𝐶𝑠𝑎) (𝑉𝑖𝑛1 − 𝐷)2 (5-16) Similarly, the energy stored in the input inductor Lin has to be sufficient to discharge the body capacitor Csa of switch Sa during interval-3 to achieve ZVS. Therefore, the condition in (5-17) must be satisfied for switch Sa to achieve ZVS. 12 𝐿𝑖𝑛 𝐼𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑎𝑥)2 ≥12(𝐶𝑠1 + 𝐶𝑠𝑎) (𝑉𝑖𝑛1 − 𝐷)2 (5-17) 80 5.3.3 Design Methodology A design example is provided to determine the input inductor Lin, the optimal resonant frequency fr, the resonant inductor Lr and the resonant capacitor Cr. The specifications for the example are listed in Table 5.1. The input voltage range is the AC line voltage of 85 V to 140 V, which includes a 10 % tolerance for the nominal values. Table 5.1 Design Specifications Parameter Value Input voltage range, Vin 85 - 140 Vac Input current ripple, I%Ripple 25% Switching frequency, fs 150 kHz Rated output power, Po 650 W Output Voltage, Vo 400 Vdc In order to calculate the input inductor Lin it is considered to have 25% input current ripple, I%Ripple Therefore, Lin, is determined to be 207 µH, using (5-18). 𝐿𝑖𝑛 =𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑖𝑛)2𝐼%𝑅𝑖𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑓𝑠 𝑃𝑜 (1 − √2 𝑉𝑖𝑛(𝑚𝑖𝑛) 𝑉𝑜) = 207 𝜇𝐻 (5-18) In order to calculate the resonant frequency, below-resonance operation is assumed in order to reduce the turn-off losses of the PFC switches. Hence, using (3-4) and (5-8), where Tr = 1/fr and Ton = D/fs, the minimum resonant frequency is fr = 130 kHz. The resonant inductor value can be determined to maintain ZVS by using (5-16) and (3-2) as Lr ≥ 20 µH and Cr ≥ 0.5 µF. 5.3.4 Converter Loss Analysis A detailed loss analysis was performed using standard analytical techniques and PSIM simulation results (to model conduction losses) for the benchmark AC-DC boost converter and the proposed high gain 81 HRPWM ZVS converter. The estimated loss distribution is provided in Figure 5.4 using 150 kHz switching frequency, 100 V input and a 650 W load. The low line 100 V input operating point was chosen since semiconductor conduction losses are highest at this point, therefore it is the point used to size the heatsinks for a prototype. Figure 5.4 Loss distribution comparison at Vin = 100 V, fs = 150 kHz, Po = 650 W, Vo = 400 V. Total losses in the converter are estimated to be reduced by 10.7 W (from 55.7 W to 45 W) compared to the benchmark boost PFC. The proposed converter nearly eliminates the switching losses, so the PFC MOSFET losses, including both conduction and switching are lower and the diode bridge conduction losses are reduced by 9.5 W (from 16.5 W to 7 W). In addition to the cost of the additional circuit components, the performance penalty for adding the auxiliary components includes increased circulating currents, resulting in slightly increased conduction losses. However, given the reduction in frequency dependent losses, the increased conduction losses are more than offset (i.e. by 10.7 W). Compared to the conventional 4.026.016.50.03.30.02.9 3.055.714.84.57.04.7 4.52.14.4 3.045.00.010.020.030.040.050.060.0Power Losses [W]Boost PFC at Vin = 100 VZVS HRPWM PFC at Vin = 100 V 82 boost PFC converter, one of the main benefits of the proposed converter is improved heat distribution, since the most lossy components (i.e. the PFC MOSFETs and bridge diodes) will run cooler due to lower losses. It is noted that these results are at 150 kHz switching frequency. At higher frequencies, the loss reduction would be more substantial. The experimental results presented in the next section verify the analysis results and the primary conclusion related to reduce losses in the PFC MOSFETs and bridge diodes. 5.4 Experimental Results The performance of the proposed ZVS converter was evaluated and compared to the performance of the conventional PFC boost converter using 650 W experimental prototype circuits. A complete schematic of the proposed converter is provided in Figure A- 4 in the Appendix. Table 5.2 and Table 5.3 show the key components used in the proposed ZVS converter and conventional PFC boost converter, respectively. Table 5.2 Key components for the high gain ZVS HRPWM converter. Component Device Description S1, S2, Sa IPP65R099C6 D1, D2 STTH8R06D D3, D4 GBJ2506 Lin 250 µH Lr 25 µH Cr 0.5 µF, ECW Series Table 5.3 Key components for the conventional PFC converter. Component Device Description PFC switch IPP65R099C6 (2 in parallel) PFC diode MUR860 Diode bridge GBJ2506 PFC inductor 250 µH 83 The experimental input voltage and input current waveforms for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 5.5. Test conditions were as follows: Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W, fs = 150 kHz. The input current is in phase with the input voltage, and its shape is close to a sinusoidal waveform, as expected. VinIin Figure 5.5 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 5ms/div of input voltage Vin (ch3: 100 V/div) and input current Iin (ch3: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. The voltages across the MOSFETs S1 and S2 are presented in Figure 5.6 and Figure 5.7, respectively, where S1 and S2 are working as a PFC switch for the positive and negative line cycle operations, respectively. It can be seen that the gate voltage waveforms are clean and there is no Miller plateau region, indicating ZVS for S1 and S2 during the turn-on transitions. It is also noted that all commutations occur with a voltage level equivalent to near half the output voltage Vo, even though all the switches block the full dc-link voltage. This yields low switching losses. 84 ZVS turn-onVS1Vg Figure 5.6 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S1, VS1 (ch3: 50 V/div) and gating signal for S1, VGS1 (ch4: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. VS2ZVS turn-onVg Figure 5.7 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 200ns/div of voltage across switch S2, VS2 (ch2: 50 V/div) and gating signal for S2, VGS2 (ch1: 5 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Figure 5.8 and Figure 5.9 show the waveforms of the current and voltage across diodes D1 and D2, respectively. As shown in Figure 5.8 and Figure 5.9, the diode D1 and D2 are both turned off with ZCS. With ZCS, the diode losses and switching noise are minimized. 85 ZCS turn-offVD1 ID1 Figure 5.8 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 1μs/div of voltage across diode D1, VD1 (ch 4: 100 V/div) and current through diode D1, ID1 (ch 1: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. ZCS turn-offID2VD2 Figure 5.9 High voltage gain soft-switching converter experimental waveforms at 1μs/div of voltage across diode D2, VD2 (ch 4: 100 V/div) and current through diode D2, ID2 (ch 1: 5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 400 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 150 kHz. Curves of the measured converter efficiency versus output power at 100 V input are provided in, Figure 5.10. Curves of total loss are provided in Figure 5.11 for 100 V input for the high gain ZVS HRPWM and conventional boost PFC converters, respectively. The proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency of 94.6 % at 350 W load. The proposed converter maintains greater efficiency and lower power loss across the 86 entire load range. Furthermore, the efficiency improvement at full load is 1.5 percentage points, representing a total power loss savings of 10 W. Note that the measured loss savings of 10 W is very close to the 10.7 W predicted analytically in section 5.3.4. The efficiency improvement can be attributed to the proposed converter eliminating, or minimizing three major sources of loss compared with the conventional boost: the conduction losses in the diode bridge rectifier, the turn-on losses of the PFC switches, and the reverse recovery losses in the output diodes. Figure 5.10 Efficiency as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V and fs = 150 kHz for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM and the benchmark boost PFC converters. 89909192939495100 300 500 700Efficiency [%]Output Power [W]ZVS HRPWM (VIN=100V)Boost (VIN=100V) 87 Figure 5.11 Total loss as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM and the benchmark boost PFC converters. The curve of the measured converter power factor versus output power for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM converter is provided in Figure 5.12 at 100V input. The power factor is greater than 0.99 from 25% load to full load. Figure 5.12 Power factor as a function of load at Vin = 100 V, Vo = 400 V for the proposed high gain ZVS HRPWM converter. 1015202530354045505560100 300 500 700Total Loss [W]Output Power [W]ZVS HRPWM (VIN=100V)Boost (VIN=100V)0.9750.980.9850.990.9951100 300 500 700Power FactorOutput Power [W]ZVS HRPWM (VIN=100V) 88 In order to verify the quality of the input current in the proposed topology, its harmonics up to the 39th harmonic are given and compared with the EN 61000-3-2 standard in Figure 5.13 for 100 V and 240 V input. All converter harmonics are well below IEC standard. Figure 5.13 Input current harmonics at Vin = 100 V and 240 V at full load condition for proposed ZVS HRPWM converter. 5.5 Summary A new high voltage gain soft-switching HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter was presented in this chapter. Unlike the conventional boost, or bridgeless boost converters, the switching commutations of the proposed converter occur with a voltage level equivalent to the summation of half of the output voltage and the voltage ripple on the resonant capacitor, which yields low switching losses. This converter has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. Moreover, the proposed converter minimizes switching losses by achieving ZVS for all switches and ZCS for the output rectifier diodes, which reduces the reverse recovery losses. The proposed converter is also bridgeless, which minimizes the heat management issues in diode bridge rectifier required before the input of the conventional boost PFC. The high voltage gain soft-switching converter operation and analysis were presented. An experimental prototype was built to verify the proof-of-concept and the key experimental waveforms were provided. The converter power factor and efficiency measurements were provided as a function of load power at 100V input. The power factor is 0.00.51.01.52.02.53 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39Harmonic Current (A)Harmonics OrderEN 61000-3-2 Class A Limits (A)Amplitude (A) Vin = 100VAmplitude (A) Vin = 240V 89 greater than 0.99 from 25% load to full load. The proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency of 94.6% at 100 V input and 350 W output power. Compared to the conventional hard-switched PFC boost converter at the maximum loss operating point (full load and 100 V ac input), the proposed converter achieves a 1.5 percentage point efficiency improvement. 90 6 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless Isolated Single-Stage AC-DC PFC Converter 6.1 Overview In Chapters 3, 4 and 5, three novel non-isolated AC-DC PFC converters were proposed and analyzed. As discussed in Chapter 1, in most applications, following an AC-DC PFC converter, a secondary DC-DC stage is required to meet the regulation and galvanic isolation. This second stage converts the DC bus voltage of the front end non-isolated AC-DC PFC converter into a regulated output DC voltage. Typically, this system is known as two-stage system and it is well suited for high power applications. In this chapter, a soft-switching single-stage AC-DC PFC converter is proposed such that there is no dedicated PFC converter in the front end. The motivation for the work is the common use of single-stage PFC converters in low power applications requiring isolation. The proposed converter features inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities, low conduction loss due to low voltage stress of the secondary diodes, no dc magnetizing current for the transformer, and no stored energy in the transformer. Moreover, since the primary MOSFETs are turned on with ZVS and the secondary diodes are turned off with ZCS, the proposed converter has minimal switching losses. In addition, the input filter size can be minimized due to a continuous input current (i.e. CCM operation), and the output filter does not require an inductor. Therefore, the proposed converter has the desired features of high efficiency and high power density. The two primary MOSFETs can be driven with the same PWM signal, and sensing both the positive and negative AC line cycle operation is not required, enabling simplified control. The proposed soft-switching bridgeless single-stage AC-DC PFC converter topology is illustrated in Figure 6.1. 91 Vin LinD1D2CaSaCrLrvCr+-CsaLmiLmvCa+-S2S1iLinCs2Cs1iLrC1C2RoCoD4D3vC2+-vC1+-is vO+-Np NsvD4+-vD3+-vS2+-vS1+-iS1iS2 vSa+-+- Figure 6.1 Proposed soft-switching bridgeless single-stage isolated converter. Section 6.2 provides the modes of operation of the proposed converter, including the details of soft-switching operation. In Section 6.3, a detailed analysis and a design example of the proposed converter is presented. Finally, Section 6.4 provides the simulation results showing the soft-switching operation. 6.2 Modes of Operation In the paragraphs that follow, the operation of the proposed converter is explained in detail and a mathematical analysis of its steady-state operation is provided. For simplicity, the discussion refers only to the positive AC half-line cycle operation over one switching cycle, and all components are ideal except the MOSFETs, which include the output capacitance and anti-parallel body diode. It is also assumed that the capacitances of Ca, Cr, C1 and C2 are large enough to be considered constant voltage sources. The key waveforms and operational modes for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 6.2 and Figure 6.3, respectively. Interval-1(t0-t1): This mode starts when the secondary current Is reaches zero and D3 turns off at t0. At t1, D4 turns on as shown in Figure 6.3(a). During this mode, the MOSFET S1 is carrying a portion of the boost inductor current ILin and the transformer primary current ILr, which increase linearly. The slope of the boost inductor current ILin and the transformer primary current ILr are given by (6-1) and (6-2), respectively. 92 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛 = 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝐿𝑖𝑛 (6-1) 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐼𝐿𝑟 = 1𝐿𝑟[(𝑉𝐶𝑎 − 𝑉𝐶𝑟) −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝐶2] (6-2) The transformer’s secondary current Is flows through D4, and increases linearly while C1 is discharged and C2 is charged. Interval-2(t1-t2): This mode starts when S1 turns off at t1. During this interval, the sum of ILin and ILr initially flows through Cs1 and Csa, and when Csa is fully discharged to zero the sum of ILin and ILr flows to the body diode Dsa. This situation initiates the ZVS turn-on of Sa. The gate signal Vg_Sa is applied to turn-on Sa with ZVS. During this mode, the boost inductor current ILin and the transformer primary current ILr decrease linearly. The equivalent circuit for this mode of operation is shown in Figure 6.3(b). The slope of the boost inductor current ILin and the transformer primary current ILr are given by (6-3) and (6-4), respectively. 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛 = 𝑉𝑖𝑛 − 𝑉𝐶𝑎𝐿𝑖𝑛 (6-3) 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐼𝐿𝑟 = 1𝐿𝑟[(−𝑉𝐶𝑟) −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝐶2] (6-4) The transformer’s secondary current Is flows through D4, and decreases linearly while C2 is discharged and C1 is charged. Interval-3(t2-t3): This mode starts when Is decreases to zero at t2 and D4 turns off. During this mode D3 is turned on, and the boost inductor current ILin and the transformer primary current ILr decrease linearly; their slopes are given by (6-3) and (6-5), respectively. The transformer’s secondary current Is flows through D3, and decreases linearly while C2 is discharged and C1 is charged. The equivalent circuit for this mode of operation is shown in Figure 6.3(c). 93 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐼𝐿𝑟 = 1𝐿𝑟[(−𝑉𝐶𝑟) +𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝐶1] (6-5) Interval-4(t3-t4): This mode starts when Sa is turned off at t3. During this interval, the sum of ILin and ILr initially flows through Cs1 and Csa while charging Csa and discharging Cs1. When Cs1 is fully discharged to zero, the sum of ILin and ILr flows to the body diode Ds1. This situation initiates the ZVS turn-on of S1. The gate signal Vg_S1/S2 is applied to turn-on S1 with ZVS. The boost inductor current ILin increases linearly similarly as interval-1 and the transformer primary current ILr increases abruptly and is given by (6-6). 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝐼𝐿𝑟 = 1𝐿𝑟[(𝑉𝐶𝑎 − 𝑉𝐶𝑟) +𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝐶1] (6-6) 94 Vg _S1/S2ist0 t1 t2 t3 t4iLinvs1is1vsaisaVg _SaiLmvD4iD4vD3iD3iLrDTsd1Ts d2Ts Figure 6.2 Proposed single-stage soft-switching converter waveforms in CCM. 95 Vin LinD1D2CrLrC1C2RoCoD4D3S1S2CaSaLmiLmisiLr (a) (a) vin LinD1D2CrLrC1C2RoCoD4D3S1S2CaSaLmiLmiLris (b) vin LinD1D2CrLrC1C2RoCoD4D3S1S2CaSaLmiLmiLris (c) vinLinD1D2CrLrC1C2RoCoD4D3S1S2vSa+-CaSaLmiLmiLris (d) Figure 6.3 Proposed soft-switching single-stage converter waveforms in CCM. 96 6.3 Analysis and Design 6.3.1 DC Voltage Conversion Ratio By applying the volt-second product equations on Lin, Lr and Lm during one switching period, the following equations can be easily obtained: 𝑉𝐶𝑎 =11 − 𝐷 𝑉𝑖𝑛 (6-7) 𝑉𝐶𝑟 = 𝐷 𝑉𝐶𝑎 (6-8) 𝑉𝐶2 = (1 − 𝐷 − 𝑑1 + 𝑑2) 𝑉𝑜 = (1 − 𝐷) 𝑉𝑜 − 𝛾 (6-9) 𝑉𝐶1 = (𝐷 + 𝑑1 − 𝑑2) 𝑉𝑜 = 𝐷 𝑉𝑜 + 𝛾 (6-10) where D is the duty ratio of S1 and 𝛾 is the correction factor given by 𝛾 = (𝑑1 − 𝑑2) 𝑉𝑜. From (6-7) to (6-10), the peak currents of the secondary diodes are given by (6-11) and (6-12). 𝐼𝐷4(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘) =𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝐷 𝑇𝑆𝐿𝑟[(1 − 𝐷) (𝑉𝐶𝑎 −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) + 𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝛾] (6-11) 𝐼𝐷3(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘) =𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 (1 − 𝐷) 𝑇𝑆𝐿𝑟[𝐷 (𝑉𝐶𝑎 −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝛾] (6-12) Now 𝛾 can be obtained by applying the ampere-second balance on C1 and C2 and is given by (6-13). 𝛾 =𝐷 (1 − 𝐷) (1 − 2𝐷)𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2 𝑁𝑆𝑁𝑃 (𝑉𝐶𝑎 −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) (6-13) By substituting (6-13) into (6-11) and (6-12) the peak current of D4 and D3 can be found by (6-14) and (6-15), respectively. 97 𝐼𝐷4(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘) =𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝐷 𝑇𝑆𝐿𝑟 (1 − 𝐷)2𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2(𝑉𝐶𝑎 −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) (6-14) 𝐼𝐷3(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘) =𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 (1 − 𝐷) 𝑇𝑆𝐿𝑟 𝐷2𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2(𝑉𝐶𝑎 −𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) (6-15) The load current can be given by (6-16). 𝐼𝑜 =𝑉𝑜𝑅𝑜=12 𝐷𝑇𝑆𝐼𝐷4(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘)1𝑇𝑆= 12 (1 − 𝐷)𝑇𝑆𝐼𝐷3(𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘)1𝑇𝑆 (6-16) Therefore, from (6-14) and (6-16) the ratio of Vo to VCa can be given by (6-17). 𝑉𝑜𝑉𝐶𝑎=𝑁𝑆𝑁𝑃 𝐷2(1 − 𝐷)2𝐷2(1 − 𝐷)2 + (𝑁𝑆𝑁𝑃)2 2 𝐿𝑟𝑓𝑠𝑅𝑜 [𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2] (6-17) where fs is the switching frequency. Now by substituting (6-7) into (6-18), the input-output voltage conversion ratio can be given by (6-18). 𝑉𝑜𝑉𝑖𝑛=𝑁𝑆𝑁𝑃 𝐷2(1 − 𝐷)𝐷2(1 − 𝐷)2 + (𝑁𝑆𝑁𝑃)2 2 𝐿𝑟𝑓𝑠𝑅𝑜 [𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2] (6-18) 6.3.2 ZVS Conditions for the Switches The ZVS conditions for S1 and S2 depend in part on the input current ILin and the transformer primary current ILr at the switching instant. The ZVS condition for the auxiliary switch Sa is achieved when the PWM switches are turned off at t1. The current during the ZVS transition of Sa is the sum of ILr(t1) and ILin(t1) as given by (6-19). 98 𝐼𝑠𝑎(𝑍𝑉𝑆) = 𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑡1) + 𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡1) (6-19) 𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑡1) can be calculated from (6-4), (6-7), (6-8) and (6-13) and is given by (6-20) and 𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡1) can be calculated from (6-3) and is given by (6-21). 𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑡1) =1𝐿𝑟𝐹𝑆𝐷(1 − 𝐷)2𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2 (11 − 𝐷 𝑉𝑖𝑛 − 𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) (6-20) 𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡1) =𝑉𝑜2𝜂 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝑅𝑜+𝑉𝑖𝑛2𝐿𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑆 𝐷 (6-21) and 𝜂 is the efficiency of the proposed converter. For ZVS of Sa, there must also be sufficient energy stored in the input inductor, Lin at t1 to completely discharge the switch capacitance Csa. Hence, to ensure ZVS turn-on of Sa, (6-22) must be satisfied, where CS1 and CSa are the output capacitances of S1 and Sa respectively. 12 𝐿𝑟𝐼𝑆𝑎(𝑍𝑉𝑆)2 ≥12(1 − 𝐷)2 (𝐶𝑆1 + 𝐶𝑆𝑎) 𝑉𝑖𝑛2 (6-22) To achieve ZVS for S1, it must be turned on during interval-4 (t3-t4). The current required to achieve ZVS for the PWM switches is determined by the difference between iLr and iin at t3, as given by (6-23), where 𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑡3) can be calculated from (6-6), (6-7), (6-8) and (6-13) and is given by (6-24) and 𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡3) can be calculated from (6-1) and is given by (6-25). 𝐼𝑠1(𝑍𝑉𝑆) = |𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑡3)| − 𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡3) (6-23) |𝐼𝐿𝑟(𝑡3)| =1𝐿𝑟𝐹𝑆𝐷2(1 − 𝐷)𝐷2 + (1 − 𝐷)2 (11 − 𝐷 𝑉𝑖𝑛 − 𝑁𝑃𝑁𝑆 𝑉𝑜) (6-24) 99 𝐼𝐿𝑖𝑛(𝑡3) =𝑉𝑜2𝜂 𝑉𝑖𝑛𝑅𝑜− 𝑉𝑖𝑛2𝐿𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑆 𝐷 (6-25) In addition to the timing requirement, there must also be sufficient energy stored in the resonant inductor Lr to completely discharge Cs1. To ensure ZVS turn-on of the PWM switches S1 and S2, the inequality in (6-26) must be satisfied. 12 𝐿𝑟𝐼𝑆1(𝑍𝑉𝑆)2 ≥12(1 − 𝐷)2 (𝐶𝑆1 + 𝐶𝑆𝑎) 𝑉𝑖𝑛2 (6-26) 6.4 Simulation Results The proposed converter can be designed using (6-22) and (6-26) to achieve ZVS for all MOSFETs. The example specifications for the proposed converter were as follows: Vin = 85 - 265 VAC, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W, fs = 70 kHz. In order to have ZVS for S1, S2 and Sa the inductor value is determined using (6-22) and (6-26) as Lr = 40 µH, considering (Cs1 + Csa) ≥ 1.5 nF. The value of the capacitors Cr, C1, and C2 is chosen based on the design of Lr. The resonant frequency, fr formed by Cr and C1 (or C2) with Lr should be sufficiently low compare with switching frequency, fs so that there is not excessive resonant current circulating through the PWM switch when it is turned on. A good compromise for design purposes is to select resonant frequency, fr one-third of the switching frequency, fs. Thus, considering fr as 20 kHz the capacitors value can be calculated as Cr= 2 µF, C1 = C2 = 6 µF. The value of the clamping capacitor Ca can be calculated from (4-19) as 100 µF. The simulated input voltage, input current, and output voltage waveforms for the proposed converter are provided in Figure 6.4. Test conditions were as follows: Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W, fs = 70 kHz. The input current is in phase with the input voltage, and its shape is close to a sinusoidal waveform, as expected. Moreover, the continuous input current demonstrates that the converter operates in CCM. 100 Figure 6.4 Soft-switching single-stage converter experimental waveforms at 2ms/div of input voltage Vin (100 V/div), input current Iin (10 A/div) and output voltage Vo (25 V/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. The waveform illustrating the ZVS transition during turn-on for S1 is provided in Figure 6.5 for positive line cycle operation, when S1 is working as the PWM switch. S1 is turned on when current is flowing in the negative direction, which indicates that during the turn-on transition, current is flowing through the body diode of S1 to ensure ZVS. The waveform illustrating the ZVS transition during turn-on for S2 for negative line cycle operation is provided in Figure 6.6, when S2 is working as the PWM switch. It can be observed from Figure 6.6 that S2 also achieves ZVS. 0.15 0.152 0.154 0.156 0.158 0.16 0.162 0.164 0.166 0.168Time (s)0-100-200100200Vin Iin*10 Vo*4 101 Figure 6.5 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 2μs/div of voltage across switch S1, Vds (100 V/div) and current through S1, Ids (5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. Figure 6.6 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 2μs/div of voltage across switch S2, Vds (100 V/div) and current through S2, Ids (5 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. The waveforms of the current through and voltage across diodes D4 and D3 are provided in Figure 6.7 and Figure 6.8, respectively. As shown in Figure 6.7 and Figure 6.8, the diodes D4 and D3 are both turned 0.1544805 0.1544844 0.1544883 0.1544922 0.1544961Time (s)0100200300400500Vds Ids*200.1544688 0.1544727 0.1544766 0.1544805 0.1544844Time (s)0-100100200300400500Vds Ids*20 102 off with ZCS. Unlike most single-stage converters, the voltage across the rectifier diodes D4 and D3 is equal to the output voltage (i.e. 48V in this example). Figure 6.7 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across diode D4, VD4 (20 V/div) and current through diode D4, ID4 (20 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. Figure 6.8 Soft-switching single-stage converter simulation waveforms at 5μs/div of voltage across diode D3, VD3 (20 V/div) and current through diode D3, ID3 (20 A/div) at Vin = 120 V, Vo = 48 V, Po = 650 W and fs = 70 kHz. 0.151925 0.15193 0.151935 0.15194 0.151945Time (s)0204060VD4 I(D4)0.1513047 0.1513086 0.1513125 0.1513164 0.1513203 0.1513242 0.1513281 0.151332 0.1513359Time (s)012.52537.550VD3 I(D3) 103 6.5 Summary This chapter presented a soft-switching bridgeless single-stage AC-DC PFC converter topology. A detailed explanation of the proposed converter operating principles and modes of operation was presented. Simulation results demonstrated the steady-state operation of the proposed topology. The proposed converter reduces switching losses by realizing ZVS for the two PFC MOSFETs and one auxiliary MOSFET, and ZCS for the output rectifier diodes. The proposed converter has many advantages for practical implementation. This converter has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities and standard average current mode control can be easily implemented, and the PWM switches can be driven with the same PWM signal, so extra circuitry is not required to sense both the positive and negative line-cycle operation. The simulation results shows that unlike most single-stage converters, the voltage across the rectifier diodes D4 and D3 is equal to the output voltage. 104 7 Conclusions The growing demand for electronic devices with high-quality input current necessitates power factor corrected AC-DC converters. Moreover, the demand for ever-increasing power density requires both higher efficiency (to reduce losses and device temperatures) and higher frequency operation (to reduce passive component sizes). In a traditional hard-switching AC-DC converter, the requirements for high efficiency and high frequency are in direct conflict; increasing the switching frequency increases switching losses. Soft-switching converters can greatly reduce switching losses, allowing operation at high frequency while maintaining required efficiency targets. This thesis proposed three new non-isolated topologies and one new isolated single-stage topology for efficient single-phase AC-DC converters as outlined in the following sub-sections. 7.1.1 A Hybrid-Resonant Bridgeless AC-DC Power Factor Correction Converter The first contribution, presented in Chapter 3, is a novel bridgeless HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter, which has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. The converter architecture also enables simple implementation of lightning and surge protection systems. Moreover, the proposed converter also realizes bridgeless converter operation which minimizes the heat management issues of a diode bridge rectifier. A detailed explanation of the proposed converter operating principles and modes of operation was presented. A step-by-step design procedure was described. Experimental results demonstrated the proposed converter’s inherent in-rush current limiting, and its ability to withstand sustained over voltage conditions. 7.1.2 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC PFC Converter In Chapter 4, the second contribution presented was a soft-switching bridgeless HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter. Unlike the conventional boost, or bridgeless boost converters, the proposed converter minimizes switching losses by achieving (ZVS) for all switches. Moreover, (ZCS) for the output rectifier diodes reduces the reverse recovery losses. The proposed converter also realizes bridgeless converter operation 105 which minimizes the heat management issues of a diode bridge rectifier. An experimental prototype was built and presented in order to verify the proof-of-concept. Key experimental waveforms were provided. The converter power factor and efficiency measurements were provided as a function of load power at 100V and 240V input. The power factor exceeds 0.98 from half load to full load. The proposed converter achieved a peak efficiency of 96.95% at 240 V input and 650 W output power. At the maximum loss operating point (full load and 100 V AC input), the proposed converter achieves an efficiency improvement of one percentage point versus the conventional hard-switched PFC converter, and it also operates with lower semiconductor device temperatures. 7.1.3 A High Voltage Gain Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC-DC PFC Converter The third contribution, presented in Chapter 5, is a high voltage gain soft-switching bridgeless HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter. Unlike the conventional boost, or bridgeless boost converters, the switching commutations of the proposed converter occur with a voltage level equivalent to half of the output voltage, which reduces switching losses and device stress. Moreover, the proposed converter minimizes switching losses by achieving ZVS for all switches and ZCS for the output rectifier diodes, which reduces the reverse recovery losses. The proposed converter also realizes bridgeless converter operation, which minimizes the heat management issues of a diode bridge rectifier. The high voltage gain soft-switching converter operation and analysis were presented. An experimental prototype was built to verify the proof-of-concept, and the key experimental waveforms were provided. The converter power factor and efficiency measurements were provided as a function of load power at 100 V AC input. With a 100 V AC input, the proposed converter achieves a peak efficiency of 94.6% at 350 W output power, and power factor exceeding 0.99 from 25% load to full load. Compared to the conventional hard-switched PFC boost converter at the maximum loss point (full load and 100 V ac input), the proposed converter achieves an efficiency improvement of 1.5 percentage points. 106 7.1.4 A Soft-Switching Bridgeless Single-stage AC-DC PFC Converter In Chapter 6, the fourth and final contribution presented was a single-stage isolated soft-switching bridgeless HRPWM AC-DC PFC converter. A detailed explanation of the proposed converter operating principles and modes of operation was presented. Simulation results were presented to demonstrate soft-switching operation of the proposed converter. The converter reduces switching losses by realizing ZVS for the two PFC MOSFETs and one auxiliary MOSFET, and ZCS for the output rectifier diodes. The proposed converter has many advantages for practical implementation. It can be easily implemented with standard average current mode control, and the PWM switches can be driven with the same PWM signal, so extra circuitry is not required to sense both the positive and the negative line-cycle operation. 7.1.5 Comparison and Feature Summary of the Proposed Topologies Table 7.1 provides a comparison of the proposed topologies in terms of soft-switching capability, relative size and cost (based on component count), and full load and peak efficiency. All data is reported at 400 V DC output. The HRPWM PFC, presented in chapter 3 has the lowest relative cost and achieved the highest peak efficiency, however the results are presented at 70 kHz switching frequency. The topologies presented in chapters 4 and 5 were tested at 150 kHz switching frequency, so the advantage of soft-switching inherent in these topologies is offset by increases in other frequency dependent losses in the converters. It is noted that the full-load efficiency of the topology presented in chapter 4 is higher than that in chapter 3. This is significant since total losses are maximum at full load, so higher efficiency here means less heat dissipation in the converter and potentially improved longevity. The high-gain ZVS PFC results presented in chapter 5 are reported at a significantly lower AC line input voltage of 100 V, as compared to those in chapters 4 and 5 since this topology cannot provide a 400 V output at high line conditions (i.e. 240 V). At low AC input line voltage, conduction losses increase for a given power level, hence the lower reported efficiency results in the 93-95 % range are expected. 107 Table 7.1 Comparison and feature summary of the proposed topologies Topology Features Relative size and cost AC Input voltage and switching frequency test conditions Full Load (650 W) Efficiency Peak Efficiency Proposed HRPWM PFC (chapter 3) Bridgeless, inrush current limit Low 240 V 70 kHz 96.71 % 97.51 % Proposed ZVS bridgeless PFC (chapter 4) Bridgeless, inrush current limit, soft-switching Medium 240 V 150 kHz 96.95 % 96.95 % Proposed High-gain ZVS PFC (chapter 5) Bridgeless, inrush current limit, soft-switching, low voltage rated devices Medium 100 V 150 kHz 93.52 % 94.62 % Proposed ZVS bridgeless isolated PFC (chapter 6) Bridgeless, inrush current limit, soft-switching, isolated High (includes isolation) N/A N/A N/A 7.2 Future Work This section provides possible recommendations to expand on the work done in this thesis. 7.2.1 Experimental Validation of Bridgeless Single-stage AC-DC PFC Converter In chapter 6, a soft-switching bridgeless single-stage AC-DC PFC converter has been proposed. The simulation work shows the feasibility of the converter. However, an experimental work is needed to further validate the converter operation. 7.2.2 Interleaved Soft-switching AC-DC PFC Converter Most of the soft-switching PFC boost topologies discussed in this dissertation are best suited for medium power applications (i.e. 500 W to 1000 W). For high power applications, more research activities are needed to achieve optimized soft-switching operation in interleaved PFC converters. 108 7.2.3 High Frequency Converter Operation The very high frequency operation of power converter can further increase the power density of the converter system, but conventional silicon superjunction MOSFETs are not suitable for operation above a few 100 kHz. The newly developed Gallium Nitride (GaN) devices open up a wide research area for very high frequency operation of power converters at the MHz switching frequencies. 109 References [1] D. W. Gao, C. Mi and A. Emadi, "Modeling and simulation of electric and hybrid vehicles," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 729-745, Apr. 2007. [2] Agilent, “Agilent AN 1273 Compliance Testing to the IEC 1000-3-2 (EN 61000-3-2) and IEC 1000-3-3 (EN 61000-3-3) Standards Application Note,” AN 1273, 2000 [3] B. Singh ; B.N. Singh ; A. Chandra ; K. Al-Haddad ; A. Pandey ; D.P. Kothari, "A Review of Single-Phase Improved Power Quality AC-DC Converters," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, pp. 962 - 981, 2003. [4] C. Qiao ; K.M. Smedley, "A Topology Survey of Single-Stage Power Factor Corrector with a Boost Type Input-Current-Shaper," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 16, pp. 360 - 368, 2001. [5] D. Tollik ; A. Pietkiewicz, "Comparative analysis of 1-phase active power factor correction topologies," in IEEE Telecommunications Energy Conference, INTELEC, 1992, pp. 517 – 523 [6] F. Musavi, Investigation of high performance single-phase solutions for AC-DC power factor corrected boost converters. Dissertation (Ph.D), 2011, University of British Columbia. [7] C. W. Clark, Digital Control techniques for power quality improvements in power factor correction applications. Dissertation (M.A.Sc), 2012, University of British Columbia. [8] W. M. Grady, S. Santoso, "Understanding power system harmonics," Power Engineering Review, IEEE , vol.21, no.11, pp.8-11, Nov. 2001 [9] H. Kim, G. Seo, B. Cho and H. Choi, “A simple average current control with on-time doubler for multiphase CCM PFC converter” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1683-1693, Mar. 2015. [10] H. Choi and L. Balogh, "A cross-coupled master–slave interleaving method for boundary conduction mode (BCM) PFC converters," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 4202-4211, Oct. 2012. [11] C. W. Clark, F. Musavi and W. Eberle, “Digital DCM detection and mixed conduction mode control for boost PFC converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 347-355, Jan. 2014. 110 [12] K. Yao, X. Ruan, X. Mao and Z. Ye, "Reducing storage capacitor of a DCM boost PFC converter," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 151-160, Jan. 2012. [13] D. –H. Kim, G. –Y. Choe and B. –K. Lee, “DCM analysis and inductance design method of interleaved boost converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 4700-4711, Oct. 2013. [14] C. Marxgut, F. Krismer, D. Bortis and J. W. Kolar, “Ultraflat interleaved triangular current mode (TCM) single-phase PFC rectifier” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 873-882, Feb. 2014. [15] S. Basu ; T.M. Undeland, "Inductor Design Considerations for optimizing performance & cost of Continuous Mode Boost PFC Converters," in Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf., 2005, pp. 1133 - 1138. [16] R. W. Erickson, D. Maksimovic, Fundamentals of Power Electronics. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. [17] R. Redl, "Electromagnetic environmental impact of power electronics equipment", Proc. IEEE, vol. 89, pp.926 -938 2001 [18] P. C. Todd, "UC3854 controlled power factor correction circuit design," Unitrode APPLICATION NOTE SLUA 144 1999. [19] F. C. Dehong Xu; Jindong Zhang; Weiyun Chen; Jinjun Lin; Lee, "Evaluation of output filter capacitor current ripples in single phase PFC converters " in Proceedings of the Power Conversion Conference, PCC. vol. 3 Osaka, Japan, 2002, pp. 1226 - 1231. [20] M. M. Yungtaek Jang; Jovanovic, "Interleaved Boost Converter With Intrinsic Voltage-Doubler Characteristic for Universal-Line PFC Front End," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, pp. 1394 – 1401, July 2007 2007. [21] M. O’Loughlin;, "An Interleaved PFC Preregulator for High-Power Converters." vol. Topic 5: Texas Instrument Power Supply Design Seminar, 2007, pp. 5-1, 5-14. [22] L. Balogh ; R. Redl, "Power-factor correction with interleaved boost converters in continuous-inductor-current mode," in Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf., 1993, pp. 168 – 174. [23] A. Jinsong Zhu; Pratt, "Capacitor ripple current in an interleaved PFC converter," in IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2008, pp. 3444 – 3450. 111 [24] F. C. C. W. Pengju Kong; Shuo Wang; Lee, "Common-Mode EMI Study and Reduction Technique for the Interleaved Multichannel PFC Converter," IEEE Trans. Power Electron. vol. 23, pp. 2576 - 2584 2008. [25] D. M. Mitchell, “AC-DC converter having an improved power factor,” U.S. Patent 4 412 277, Oct. 25, 1983. [26] J. C. Salmon, "Circuit topologies for single-phase voltage-doubler boost rectifiers," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 521-529, Oct. 1993. [27] R. Martinez and P. N. Enjeti, "A high-performance single-phase rectifier with input power factor correction," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 311-317, Mar. 1996. [28] A. F. Souza and I. Barbi, "High power factor rectifier with reduced conduction and commutation losses," in Proc. Int. Telecommunication Energy Conf., Jun. 1999, pp. 8.1.1-8.1.5. [29] F. Musavi, W. Eberle and W. G. Dunford, "A phase-shifted gating technique with simplified current sensing for the semi-bridgeless AC–DC converter," IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1568-1576, May 2013. [30] Y. -S. Kim, W. -Y. Sung and B. –K. Lee, “Comparative performance analysis of high density and efficiency PFC topologies” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2666-2679, Jun. 2014. [31] A. F. Souza and I. Barbi, "A new ZCS quasi-resonant unity power factor rectifier with reduced conduction losses," in Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists., Jun. 1995, vol. 2, pp. 1171-1177. [32] A. F. Souza and I. Barbi, "A new ZVS-PWM unity power factor rectifier with reduced conduction losses," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 746-752, Nov. 1995. [33] C. M. Wang, "A new single-phase ZCS-PWM boost rectifier with high power factor and low conduction losses," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 500-510, Apr. 2006. [34] H. –Y. Tsai, T. –H. Hsia and D. Chen, "A novel soft-switching bridgeless power factor correction circuit," in Power Electronics and Applications, 2007 European Conference on, 2007, pp. 1-10. [35] H. –Y. Tsai, T. –H. Hsia and D. Chen, “A family of zero-voltage-transition bridgeless power-factor-correction circuits with a zero-current-switching auxiliary switch,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1848-1855, May 2011. 112 [36] J. -W. Shin, H. Shin, G. -S. Seo, J. -I. Ha, and B. -H. Cho, “Low-common mode voltage h-bridge converter with additional switch legs,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1773–1782, Apr. 2013. [37] J. C. Salmon, "Circuit topologies for PWM boost rectifiers operated from 1-phase and 3-phase AC supplies and using either single or split DC rail voltage outputs," in Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf., Mar. 1995, vol.1, pp. 473-479. [38] L. Huber, Y. Jang and M. M. Jovanovic, "Performance evaluation of bridgeless PFC boost rectifiers," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1381-1390, May 2008. [39] J. Liu, W. Chen, J. Zhang, D. Xu and F. C. Lee, "Evaluation of power losses in different CCM mode single-phase boost PFC converters via a simulation tool," in Conf. Rec. IEEE-IAS Annu. Meeting, Sept. 2001, vol. 4, pp. 2455-2459. [40] W. -Y. Choi, J. -M. Kwon and B. -H. Kwon, "Bridgeless dual-boost rectifier with reduced diode reverse-recovery problems for power-factor correction," IET Power Electron., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 194-202, 2008. [41] B. Su and Z. Lu, "An interleaved totem-pole boost bridgeless rectifier with reduced reverse-recovery problems for power factor correction," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1406-1415, Jun. 2010. [42] M. Marvi and A. Fotowat-Ahmady, “A fully ZVS critical conduction mode boost PFC” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1958-1965, Apr. 2012. [43] Y. Liu and K. Smedley, "A new passive soft-switching dual-boost topology for power factor correction," in Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists., Jun. 2003, vol. 2, pp. 669-676. [44] M. Ortmann, T. Soeiro, and M. Heldwein, “High switches utilization single-phase PWM boost- type PFC rectifier topologies multiplying the switching frequency,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 5749-5760, Nov. 2014. [45] E. H. Ismail, "Bridgeless SEPIC rectifier with unity power factor and reduced conduction losses," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1147-1157, Apr. 2009. 113 [46] A. J. Sabzali, E. H. Ismail, M. A. Al-Saffar and A. A. Fardoun, "New bridgeless DCM SEPIC and Cuk PFC rectifiers with low conduction and switching losses," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 873-881, Mar./Apr. 2011. [47] M. Mahdavi and H. Farzanehfard, "Bridgeless SEPIC PFC rectifier with reduced components and conduction losses," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4153-4160, Sep. 2011. [48] A. A. Fardoun, E. H. Ismail, A. J. Sabzali and M. A. Al-Saffar, "New efficient bridgeless Cuk rectifiers for PFC applications," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 3292-3301, Jul. 2012. [49] M. Mahdavi and H. Farzaneh-fard, "Bridgeless CUK power factor correction rectifier with reduced conduction losses," IET Power Electron., vol. 5, iss. 9, pp. 1733-1740, 2012. [50] J.-W. Yang and H.-L. Do, "Bridgeless SEPIC converter with a ripple-free input current," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 3388-3394, Jul. 2013. [51] B. Singh and V. Bist, "Improved power quality bridgeless cuk converter fed brushless DC motor drive for air conditioning system," IET Power Electron., vol. 6, iss. 5, pp. 902-913, 2013. [52] M. Mahdavi and H. Farzanehfard, "Zero-voltage transition bridgeless single-ended primary inductance converter power factor correction rectifier," IET Power Electron., vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 895-902, 2014. [53] C. D. Davidson, "Zero voltage switching isolated boost converter topology," in Proc. Int. Telecommunication Energy Conf., Oct. 2011, pp. 1-8. [54] S. Cuk, “True bridgeless PFC converter achieves over 98% efficiency, 0.999 power factor,” Power Electronics Technology Magazine, Part 1: pp. 10–18, July 2010; Part 2: pp. 34–40, Aug. 2010; Part 3: pp. 22–31, Oct. 2010. [55] A. A. Fardoun, E. H. Ismail, M. A. Al-Saffar and A. J. Sabzali, "A bridgeless resonant pseudo boost PFC rectifier," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 5949-5960, Nov. 2014. [56] G. C. Hua, “A novel CCM single-stage power factor correction converter,” U.S. Patent NO. 5,790,389, Aug. 4, 1998. [57] J. Sebastian, M. M. Hernando, P. Villegas, J. Diaz and A. Fontam, “Input current shaper based on the series connection of a voltage source and a loss-free resistor,” in Proc. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conf., 1998, pp. 461-467. 114 [58] S. Teramoto, M. Sekine, R. Saito, “High power factor AC/DC converter,” U.S. Patent No. 5,301,095, Apr. 5, 1994. [59] R. T. Chen, Y. Y. Chen, and Y. R. Yang, “Single-stage asymmetrical half-bridge regulator with ripple reduction technique,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1358–1369, May 2008. [60] T. F. Wu, J. C. Hung, S. Y. Tseng, and Y. M. Chen, “A single-stage fast regulator with PFC based on an asymmetrical half-bridge topology,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 139–150, Feb. 2005. [61] F. S. Kang, S. J. Park, and C. U. Kim, “ZVZCS single-stage PFC ac to dc half-bridge converter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 206–216, Feb. 2002. [62] W. Y. Choi, J. M. Kwon, J. J. Lee, H. Y. Jang, and B. H. Kwon, “Single stage soft-switching converter with boost type of active clamp for wide input voltage ranges,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 730–741, Mar. 2009. [63] Y. M. Liu and L. K. Chang, “Single-stage soft-switching AC–DC converterwith input-current shaping for universal line applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 467–479, Feb. 2009. [64] Y. S. Lee and B. T. Lin, “Adding active clamping and soft switching to boost-flyback single-stage isolated power-factor-corrected power supplies,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1017–1027, Nov.1997. [65] W.-Y. Choi and J.-S. Yoo, “A bridgeless single-stage half-bridge ac/dc converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3884–3895, Dec. 2011. 115 Appendix VinLoadDFuse PTCRelayMOV100nF150uF150uF1uF1uFEMI FilterRsenseVSENSEVCCOVPGNDGATEISENSEICOMPFREQ15VGND10R10R10K 10K68K100R3n3 6n8 1uFICE3PCS02GSTTH8R06DIPP65R099C6 IPP65R099C6250uHGBJ2506523K523K523K10K Figure A- 1 Circuit schematic of the conventional boost converter. 116 VinEMI FilterFuse1uF1uFCurrent SenseLoad100nF150uF150uFVSENSEVCCOVPGNDGATEISENSEICOMPFREQ15V68K6n8 1uFGateNCVCCCOMLOSDLinVSSNCHOVBVSNCNCNCVDDHinGND15V100nFGate1Gate2_RTNGate1_RTN470nF10K10K10RGate210R15V15V(isolated)1uFGNDGNDGate2Gate2_RTNGate1Gate1_RTNGateIRS21131uF6uHIDH08G65C5IDH08G65C5IPP65R110CFDIPP65R110CFDGBJ1506370uHMURS160T3GICE3PCS02G523K523K523K10K Figure A- 2 Circuit schematic of the converter proposed in Chapter 3. 117 VinEMI FilterFuseLoad100nF150uF150uFGate2Gate2_RTNGate1Gate1_RTN0.27uFSTTH8R06DSTTH8R06DIPP65R099C6IPP65R099C6GBJ2506250uH523K523K523KVSENSEVCCOVPGNDGATEISENSEICOMPFREQ15V33K6n8 1uFGate_InvertedGND10KGateGND_GateGND_Gate_InvertedCurrent Sense1uF1uFInverter and delay circuit10uHGNDGate3 Gate3_RTN5uFNCVCCCOMLOSDLinVSSNCHOVBVSNCNCNCVDDHinGND15V100nFGate1Gate2_RTNGate1_RTN470nF10K10K10RGate210R15V1uFIRS2113MURS160T3GGateGND_Gate15V(isolated_1)876515V (isolated_2)VsOUTOUTGNDVsINNCGND15V(isolated_2)1KGate3Gate3_RTNMIC4420SFH6721T1234Gate_Inverted6.09KGND_Gate_InvertedICE3PCS02GIPP65R099C6 Figure A- 3 Circuit schematic of the converter proposed in Chapter 4. 118 VinEMI FilterFuseLoad600uFGate2Gate2_RTNGate1Gate1_RTN0.5uFSTTH8R06DSTTH8R06DIPP65R099C6IPP65R099C6GBJ2506250uH523K523K523KVSENSEVCCOVPGNDGATEISENSEICOMPFREQ15V33K6n8 1uFGate_InvertedGND10KGateGND_GateGND_Gate_InvertedCurrent Sense1uF1uFInverter and delay circuit25uHGNDGate3 Gate3_RTNNCVCCCOMLOSDLinVSSNCHOVBVSNCNCNCVDDHinGND15V100nFGate1Gate2_RTNGate1_RTN470nF10K10K10RGate210R15V1uFIRS2113MURS160T3GGateGND_Gate15V(isolated_1)876515V (isolated_2)VsOUTOUTGNDVsINNCGND15V(isolated_2)1KGate3Gate3_RTNMIC4420SFH6721T1234Gate_Inverted6.09KGND_Gate_InvertedICE3PCS02G100nF600uFIPP65R099C6 Figure A- 4 Circuit schematic of the converter proposed in Chapter 5.
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Investigation of bridgeless single-phase solutions...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Featured Collection
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Investigation of bridgeless single-phase solutions for ac-dc power factor corrected converters Alam, Md. Muntasir Ul 2017
pdf
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | Investigation of bridgeless single-phase solutions for ac-dc power factor corrected converters |
Creator |
Alam, Md. Muntasir Ul |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Date Issued | 2017 |
Description | In modern power supplies and battery chargers, a front-end power factor correction (PFC) AC-DC converter is used to comply with regulatory requirements for input current harmonics. The prevalence of standards and recommended practices to meet harmonic current limits has gained, and continues to gain, momentum over recent years. Additionally, the improvement of overall converter efficiency is critical for the emergence and acceptance of these converter technologies, to meet the standard of efficiency and power factor requirements. This dissertation presents some innovative solutions for bridgeless non-isolated and isolated PFC AC-DC converters. All proposed converter solutions realize bridgeless converter operation to reduce conduction losses and operate in hybrid resonant pulse-width-modulation (HRPWM) mode. The PWM switches share the same gating signal, so the converter does not need extra circuitry to sense the positive and negative ac input line-cycle operation. The first contribution is a non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter, which has inherent inrush current-limiting capabilities. The converter architecture also enables simple implementation of lightning and surge protection systems. Moreover, this converter can survive sustained over-voltage events and can limit the voltage stress on the converter and downstream components. The second contribution is a non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter, which realizes soft-switching operation to reduce switching losses. This converter can operate at high switching frequency to increase power density. The third contribution is a three-level non-isolated bridgeless AC-DC converter, which has high voltage gain. This converter also provides soft-switching operation of all the power devices. Due to the three level architecture, all commutations occur with a voltage level equivalent to half the output voltage, which further reduces switching losses. This converter can utilize lower voltage rated devices, which reduces system cost. The final contribution is a single-stage bridgeless isolated AC-DC converter. This converter shows low conduction loss due to bridgeless operation and low voltage stress of the secondary diodes, low switching loss due to soft-switching operation, and a transformer that has no dc magnetizing current and does not store energy. These characteristics minimize the transformer size and increases transformer efficiency. |
Genre |
Thesis/Dissertation |
Type |
Text |
Language | eng |
Date Available | 2017-07-19 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
Rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
DOI | 10.14288/1.0348980 |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/62355 |
Degree |
Doctor of Philosophy - PhD |
Program |
Electrical Engineering |
Affiliation |
Applied Science, Faculty of Engineering, School of (Okanagan) |
Degree Grantor | University of British Columbia |
GraduationDate | 2017-09 |
Campus |
UBCO |
Scholarly Level | Graduate |
Rights URI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
AggregatedSourceRepository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- 24-ubc_2017_september_alam_md muntasir ul.pdf [ 2.3MB ]
- Metadata
- JSON: 24-1.0348980.json
- JSON-LD: 24-1.0348980-ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 24-1.0348980-rdf.xml
- RDF/JSON: 24-1.0348980-rdf.json
- Turtle: 24-1.0348980-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 24-1.0348980-rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 24-1.0348980-source.json
- Full Text
- 24-1.0348980-fulltext.txt
- Citation
- 24-1.0348980.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
http://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.24.1-0348980/manifest