Group Actions on Finite Homotopy Spheres by James Price Clarkson B.S., Western Michigan University, 2004 M.S., Purdue University, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Mathematics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) August 2010 c© James Price Clarkson 2010 Abstract Recently, Grodal and Smith [7] have developed a finite algebraic model to study hG-spaces where G is a finite group. The procedure associates to each G-space X with finite Fp homology a perfect chain complex of functors over the orbit category. When X has the homotopy type of a sphere, this construction is particularly well behaved. The reverse construction, build- ing an hG-space from the algebraic model, generally produces an infinite dimensional space. In this thesis, we construct a finiteness obstruction for hG-spheres work- ing one prime at a time. We then begin the development of a global finiteness obstruction. When G is the metacyclic group of order pq, we are able to go further and express the global finiteness obstruction in terms of dimension functions. In addition, we relate the work of tom Dieck and Petrie [19] con- cerning homotopy representations to the newer model of Grodal and Smith, and compute the rank of Vw(G). We conclude with some new examples of finite hΣ3-spheres. ii Table of Contents Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1 Homotopy Representations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2 The Orbit Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3 Algebraic Spheres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3 The Rank of V (G) and Vw(G) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.1 The Rank Computation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 4 Finiteness Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1 Finiteness Conditions for G-spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.2 Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres . . . . . . . . . . 25 4.3 Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres . . . . . . . . . 38 4.4 Examples of Finite hΣ3-spheres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.5 Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 iii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the help of several people: my wife Dana Grosser-Clarkson whose love and support were constant sources of strength, my advisor Jeff Smith, professors Alejandro Adem and Jeff Strom, and fellow student Michele Klauss. iv 1Introduction The study of group actions on spheres has long been an interesting and deep pursuit. The first results in this area, known as the Spherical Space Form Problem, were due to P. Smith [15] and later J. Milnor [13]. They gave several necessary conditions for a finite group G to act freely and smoothly on some sphere. In the 1960s, R. Swan [16] achieved his celebrated result, the classification of finite groups acting freely on spheres up to homotopy. These are the groups whose cohomology is periodic. Although at first glance this problem appears very geometric, many insights into this question are algebraic in nature. In the early 80s, tom Dieck and Petrie introduced the notion of a homo- topy representation in [19]. Given a finite group G, a homotopy representa- tion of G is a G-CW complex X which is homotopy equivalent to a sphere such that the fixed points, XH , also have the homotopy type of a sphere for every subgroup H of G. This allows one to define a dimension func- tion associated to X: namely Dim(X)(H) = dimXH + 1. The collection of homotopy representations forms a monoid, denoted by V +(G). There are many results known about the group completed object, V (G), (see, for example [19], [18], [1]) but little is known about the monoid. There are two natural notions of what is meant by a homotopy equiv- alence of G-spaces: the usual notion of G-homotopy equivalence and the weaker notion of hG-homotopy equivalence. Two spaces are said to be hG- equivalent if their Borel constructions are homotopy equivalent over BG. Equivalently, a G-space X is hG-equivalent to Y if X can be connected to Y by a zig-zag of G-maps that are homotopy equivalences. Notice that this 1 1. Introduction notion of ‘equivariant homotopy equivalence’ is weaker that the usual notion of G-homotopy equivalence. Recently, Grodal and Smith [7] have studied a monoid structure similar to that of tom Dieck and Petrie on the collection of hG-spheres, denoted by V +w (G). Although there is no requirement that the fixed points be spheres, we still have a dimension function defined on the set of subgroups whose order is a power of a prime number: by homotopy Smith Theory [5], we know that the homotopy fixed points have the mod-p homology of a sphere for any p-subgroup, P < G, where p divides the order of G. In [7], the authors show that these hG-spheres are classified via their dimension functions and that any admissible dimension function is realizable on some hG-sphere. This thesis began as an attempt to answer the following question: Question 1.0.1. Given a G-space X, when does there exist a finite dimen- sional (respectively finite) G-space Y that is hG-equivalent to X? As a starting point for this investigation, we might try to answer the above question when X has the homotopy type of a sphere. In this setting, i.e. working with hG-equivalences, restricting our attention to spheres is particularly useful as homotopy Smith Theory guarantees that the P fixed points have the mod-p homology of a sphere as well. In addition, the theory of Grodal and Smith [7] gives an algebraic model of the hG-action: every hG- sphere gives rise to a finite dimensional chain complex of finitely generated projective functors over the orbit category. This chain complex is a natural place to look for a finiteness obstruction. The question is now easier, and can be stated as follows: Question 1.0.2. Given a G-space X, such that X has the homotopy type of a sphere, when does there exist a finite dimensional (respectively finite) G-space Y , such that X and Y are hG-equivalent? Since the construction of Grodal and Smith [7] produces a complex over the p-orbit category for each prime p dividing the order of G, we further reduce the problem by studying X one prime at a time. Thus the new question is one of mod-p finite replacement: 2 1. Introduction Question 1.0.3. Given a G-space X, such that X has the homotopy type of a sphere, when does there exist a finite dimensional (respectively finite) space Yp, such that X and Yp are connected by a zig-zag of mod-p G-maps that are homotopy equivalences? In an attempt to try to answer the last two questions, it is useful to understand the results about homotopy representations. Indeed, although much has been determined virtually, it would be interesting to determine a non-virtual finiteness obstruction. Since homotopy representations are also hG-spheres, finding necessary conditions would be relevant. In addition, it is interesting to determine the rank of the groups V (G) and Vw(G), the group completions of V +(G) and V +w (G) respectively. Although this has been done for V (G) in [19], we give a different proof, which allows us to write down a basis for V (G) in terms of dimension functions. Theorem 3.1.3 (tom Dieck-Petrie). The rank of V (G) is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of subgroups of G that are cyclic after abelian- ization, i.e. rk(V (G)) = |{H ∈ ϕ(G)|H/H ′ is cyclic}|. In any discussion involving group actions and fixed points, whether work- ing with G-equivalences or hG-equivalences, it is often useful to consider di- agrams over the orbit category. In the former case, we work over the entire orbit category, using all subgroups; in the latter case we work with a dia- gram over each p-orbit category, only using the p-subgroups, for each prime p dividing the order of G. With this in mind, we give a version of Wall’s finiteness obstruction for CW-complexes [20], generalized to an arbitrary diagram category. Theorem 4.1.2. Let R be a ring, Γ a small category, RΓ-mod the cat- egory of contravariant functors Γ → R-mod, and D a Γ-CW-complex (a diagram of CW-complexes with the shape of Γ) whose fundamental cate- gory Π(Γ, D) is trivial. Moreover, suppose that D satisfies the following 3 1. Introduction additional properties: i. H∗(D) = 0 for all ∗ > n, and ii. Hn+1(D;M) = 0 for all RΓ-modules M . ThenD is equivalent to a finite dimensional I-CW-complexK. Furthermore, if K has trivial finiteness obstruction, σ(K) ∈ K̃0(RΓ), then K may be assumed to be finite. When working with G-spaces, Γ is the full orbit category. In this setting, via a theorem of Elmendorf [6], we recover the usual equivariant finiteness obstruction. However there is no such correspondence when working with hG-equivalences. Nevertheless, when working with spheres, and at a fixed prime p, it is possible to modify the above theorem to produce a finite complex that has the same mod-p hG-homotopy type. The obstruction lies in K̃0(RpΓp) modulo a particular ideal. Unlike the case for CW-complexes, the homological dimension and the topological dimension are not necessarily the same. Theorem 4.2.12. Let X be a G-space with the homotopy type of a sphere whose p-fixed points are at least 3-connected. Then X is hG-equivalent to a finite dimensional complex. Furthermore, if σp(X) = 0, then there is a finite space Y that is hG-equivalent to X at the prime p, where p divides the order of G. In particular the homology of Y at p-groups agrees with that of X. Our goal is to classify finite hG-spheres globally. It would be even more satisfying to classify them directly, instead of with a K̃0-type obstruction. One approach to this problem is to examine conditions on the dimension functions of finite hG-spheres. Recall that an hG-sphere X has a dimension function Dim(X)(−), given by Dim(X)(P ) = dimXhP + 1, where P is a p-group of G. A result in this direction is the following: Theorem 4.3.2. Let G be the metacyclic group G = Cp oCq for distinct primes p and q, with q dividing p − 1. An hG-sphere X is realizable on 4 1. Introduction a finite CW complex if and only if q divides DimX(G/e) − DimX(G/Cp) where DimX(−) is the dimension function of X. In [9], the authors investigate when a group can act on a finite complex with the G-homotopy type of a sphere with isotropy in some fixed family of subgroups. In that article they are only concerned with the existence of such a complex, and, since the algebraic finiteness obstructions are all torsion, a suitable join is taken to ensure that the complex is finite. In using this method, control of the dimension function is lost as the join operation is additive on dimension functions. Theorem 4.3.2 represents progress towards a more controlled process of building group actions on spheres; it determines if a particular sphere is realizable on a finite complex instead of proving that a large enough join of the sphere is finite. As an immediate consequence of theorem 4.3.2 we see that the congru- ence conditions are necessary for any group G. Corollary 4.3.3. Let G be any finite group, and X an hG-sphere with dimension function DimX(−). Let G contain subgroups H / K / M < G, whereM/K ∼= Cq acts faithfully on K/H ∼= Cp. If X is realizable on a finite complex then q divides DimX(H)−DimX(K). In [1], the author proves that the congruence conditions given above are sufficient for a virtual homotopy representation to be finite. In addition, it is known (see [4]) that all p-group actions on homology spheres are realizable on virtual linear spheres. Thus the following conjecture is reasonable: Conjecture 4.3.4. Let G be any finite group, and X an hG-sphere with dimension function DimX(−). Then X is realizable on a finite complex if and only if qr divides DimX(H) − DimX(K) for all chains of subgroups K /H /M < G, where M/K ∼= Cqr acts faithfully on K/H ∼= Cp. 5 2Background 2.1 Homotopy Representations In this section, we recall some definitions and results of tom Dieck and Petrie on homotopy representations which will be necessary for our discussion in chapter 3. In addition, the work of tom Dieck and Petrie is a good start- ing point for our discussion on finiteness conditions for group actions on homotopy spheres. The following material may be found, for example, in [19] or [18]. Definition 2.1.1. Let G be a finite group. We make the following prelimi- nary definitions: (a) Let ϕ(G) denote the collection of all conjugacy classes of sub- groups of G. (b) Let ϕp(G) denote the collection conjugacy classes of p-groups for all primes p dividing the order of G. (c) The collection of all integer valued class functions will be denoted by C(G). Although we introduced the concept of homotopy representation in the previous section we give a precise definition here. Definition 2.1.2. Let G be a finite group. A homotopy representation X of G is a finite-dimensional G-CW complex such that XH is an n(H)- dimensional CW-complex which is homotopy equivalent to the n(H)-dimensional 6 2.1. Homotopy Representations sphere Sn(H), for each subgroup H < G. A homotopy representation is called finite if X is a finite G-CW complex. There are many examples of homotopy representations that arise quite naturally, for instance: Example 2.1.3. Let V be a finite dimensional real representation of a finite group G. Then the unit sphere in V , denoted by S(V ), is a G-homotopy representation. There is a natural operation on homotopy representations, namely the join. Recall that the join of two spaces X and Y , denoted by X ∗Y , is given by X ∗ Y ' Σ(X ∧ Y ). When X and Y are spheres, the result of the join operation is evidently a sphere as well. The collection of homotopy representations for a given group G forms a semi-group V +(G) under the join operation. The Grothendieck group of V +(G) is denoted V (G). Associated to each homotopy representation X is a integer valued class function Dim(X)(−) : ϕ(G)→ Z, whose value at H is dim(XH) + 1. Here dim(−) refers to the homological dimension of XH . A correction factor of plus 1 is necessary to make the join operation behave well with Dim(X)(−). Indeed, for two G-homotopy representations X and Y , we have (DimX ∗ Y )(H) = (DimX)(H) + (DimY )(H). One should think of the theory of homotopy representation as a ‘geo- metric representation theory’ [8]. In this analogy, the dimension function plays the role of a character equation in representation theory. Pushing 7 2.2. The Orbit Category this analogy further, one should think of hG-spheres, in some sense, as a homotopical version of representation theory. In [19] and [18], the authors use the dimension function along with a de- gree function, whose image lives in Pic(G), to completely determine V (G). Every homotopy representation is evidently a homotopy sphere (simply con- sidering it as an hG-space), so exploring restrictions on the dimension func- tions of homotopy representations is a useful place to begin to understand similar restrictions on the dimension functions of hG-spheres. 2.2 The Orbit Category In this section we recall several results about the orbit category Γ of a finite group G. These results are standard and can be found in many texts, for instance, [11]. In addition, we discuss what we mean by modules over the orbit category. In general, one may define the notion of modules over any category, and most of the results presented below hold for modules over any finite, ordered, E.I. category. Since we will only be concerned with the modules over the orbit category (which is, in particular, a finite ordered E.I. category) we will not present the following results in the most general setting. Let G be a finite group and F a family of subgroups closed under the actions of conjugation and taking subgroups. The orbit category of G with respect to the family F , denoted OF (G), has transitive G-sets as objects and G-maps as morphisms. More concretely, we may write the objects of the orbit category as the set Ob(OF (G)) = {G/H|H ∈ F} ; the set morphisms between two G orbits is given by Mor(G/H,G/K) = {g ∈ G|Hg < K} /K. 8 2.2. The Orbit Category In what follows, we will write Γ = O(G) for the full orbit category and Γp for the orbit category OF (G), where F is the family of subgroups of prime power order for some prime p dividing the order of G. Notice that Γp is a full subcategory of Γ. The notion of length will be useful for induction arguments over the orbit category. We define it here: Definition 2.2.1. Let G be a finite group, and Γ the orbit category of G. (a) The length, denoted l(G/H,G/K), between two orbits G/H,G/K ∈ Γ is the maximum integer l, such that H = H0 < . . . < Hl = K is a chain of subgroups of G. (b) The length of an orbit category, denoted l(Γ), is the maximum of {l(G/H,G/K)|G/H,G/K ∈ Γ} (c) The length of an RΓ module M , denoted l(M), is the smallest integer l, such that for any chain of subgroups, H0 < . . . < Hn in G where M(Hi) 6= 0 for all 0 ≤ i ≤ n, we have n ≤ l. Let R be a commutative ring with unit. Below we use Rp to denote Z(p),Zp̂, or Z/(p), as appropriate. An RΓ-module M is a contravariant functor, M : Γ→ R−Mod, from the orbit category to the category of R-modules. A morphism of RΓ- modules is then a natural transformation of functors. The category of RΓ modules is denoted by RΓ−Mod. Since Γ is a small category and R−Mod is abelian, the category of RΓ-modules is abelian as well. We are able, therefore, to do homological algebra in the category RΓ−Mod. For RΓ-modules, the terms exact, injective, surjective, etc. are deter- mined object wise. For instance the sequence of RΓ-modules L→M → N 9 2.2. The Orbit Category is exact if and only if the sequence of RΓ-modules L(x)→M(x)→ N(x) is exact for all x ∈ Γ. As usual, a RΓ-module P is projective if and only if the functor HomRΓ(P,−) : RΓ−Mod→ R−Mod is exact. The Yoneda Lemma immediately implies the projectivity of a col- lection of RΓ-modules. Indeed, if we define Fx as the free module generated at x where x ∈ Γ by Fx(y) = RMor(y, x) for all y ∈ Γ, where RMor(y, x) is the free R-module on the set of RΓ morphisms from y to x, then HomRΓ(Fx(−),M) ∼=M(x), and so Fx(−) is a projective RΓ-module for each x ∈ Γ. We are now able to give a definition of a free RΓ-module: Definition 2.2.2. An RΓ-module M free if it is isomorphic to⊕ x∈Γ RMor(−, x) for some collection of orbits x ∈ Γ. In section 4.3, we develop a global obstruction theory based on the p- local obstruction theory discussed in section 4.2. We do this by building an integral chain complex out of local complexes. Thus we will need several results about gluing p-adic chain complexes. These results hold in greater generality, nevertheless, as above, we present them in the context of RΓ- modules. The proofs are standard, and may be found, for instance, in [9]. 10 2.2. The Orbit Category By a gluing of a collection of p-adic chain complexes, we mean an inte- gral chain complex whose completions recover the original p-adic chain com- plexes. It is possible, a priori, that the process of gluing finite dimensional p-local chain complexes might produce an infinite dimensional complex over the integers. The following proposition, however, ensures that this is not the case. Proposition 2.2.3. Let C be a projective chain complex of ZΓ-modules which has a finite homological dimension. Suppose that Rp ⊗Z C is chain homotopy equivalent to a finite dimensional chain complex of projectives for all primes p dividing the order of G. Then C is homotopy equivalent to a finite dimensional chain complex of projectives. Sketch of Proof. Since C has finite homological dimension, for sufficiently large ∗, the group Ext∗ZΓ(C,M) is finite abelian and killed by |G|. Thus after tensoring with Rp it splits into Rp-Ext groups, which, by assumption, are all zero. Even though we are now assured to have a finite complex, the homolog- ical dimension of such a complex might be wildly distorted by the gluing process. The next proposition is a technical result that allows us to reduce the dimension of a chain complex to the homological dimension plus a gap- type term, based on the length of the category Γ. We will need such a result when we attempt to build a space from a ZΓ chain complex. Proposition 2.2.4. Let C be a finite free chain complex of ZΓ-modules such that hdim C(H) ≤ DimC(H) for all H. Assume that l(H,K) ≤ k whenever Dim(H) = Dim(K). Then C is chain homotopy equivalent to a complex D which satisfies Di(H) = 0 for all i > dH + k. These results, together with a Postnikov-type argument presented in section 4.3, will allow us to construct a global finiteness obstruction from the local data given by the algebraic G-spheres described below. 11 2.3. Algebraic Spheres 2.3 Algebraic Spheres In this section, we collect various definitions and results, due to Grodal- Smith [7], concerning hG-spheres, algebraicG-spheres, and their relationship to each other. The starting point of such a discussion is the notion of hG- equivalence. Definition 2.3.1. Two spaces are said to be hG-equivalent if they can be connected by a zig-zag of G-maps that are homotopy equivalences, or, equiv- alently, if their Borel constructions are equivalent over BG. Like homotopy representations, the collection of hG-spheres for a fixed group G is naturally a monoid under the join operation. To distinguish it from that of tom Dieck and Petrie, it is denoted by V +w (G) (here the w stands for ‘weak’, indicating the use hG-equivalences, as opposed to G- equivalences). Definition 2.3.2. For a finite group G, let V +w (G) denote the monoid, under the join operation, of G-spheres up to hG-equivalence. In addition, hG-spheres have dimension functions defined in a similar fashion. However, while the fixed points of a homotopy representation are required to have the homotopy type of spheres, from homotopy Smith The- ory [5] we see that the fixed points of an hG-sphere by a p-subgroup of G necessarily have the mod-p homotopy type of a (p-adic) sphere. Thus the dimension function of an hG-sphere is defined only on the prime ordered subgroups of G. Their main result, stated below, is the development of a theory which, under certain mild restrictions, assigns to a G-space X with finite Fp homol- ogy a finite algebraic model. The following statement is a simplified version of their more general result about G-spaces with finite Fp homology. Theorem 2.3.3 (Grodal-Smith). Let G be a finite group, and X a G-space with finite Fp homology that is homotopy equivalent to a sphere. Consider 12 2.3. Algebraic Spheres the functor Φ: G-spaces → Ch(RpΓp) which associates to X associates the functor on the opposite p-orbit category Γopp given by G/P 7→ C∗(mapG(EG×G/P,X);Fp) Then Φ sends a G-space X with finite Fp-homology that is homotopy equiv- alent to a sphere to a perfect complex in Ch(RpΓp). Recall that a perfect complex is a complex which is quasi-isomorphic to a finite dimensional chain complex of finitely generated (f.g.) projective modules. When X has the homotopy type of a sphere, this model is rich enough to determine X. Such a chain complex of RpΓp-modules is called an algebraic G-sphere at the prime p if its homology evaluated at the orbit G/e is one dimensional. Algebraic G-spheres are classified by their dimension functions. This is accomplished by reducing the problem to the p-orbit category, and then using homotopy Smith Theory to show that every Borel-Smith type dimen- sion function is realizable. Recall that a function d : ϕ(G)→ N satisfies the Borel-Smith conditions (see, for example [2]) if for every chain of subgroups H /K /M < G where K/H ∼= Cp and H is a p-group then (a) d(H)− d(K) ≡ 0 mod 2 if p is odd or if M/H ∼= C4, (b) d(H) − d(K) ≡ 0 mod 4 if M/H is isomorphic to a quaternion group, (c) d(H) − p · d(M) = ∑ d(Ki) if M/H ∼= Cp × Cp and where the sum runs over the p+ 1 copies of Ki/H ∼= Cp. Although the following result holds in greater generality, we impose sev- eral restrictions to state less a technical result which is sufficient for our purposes. Theorem 2.3.4 (Grodal-Smith). Let X and Y be G-spheres that are at least 2-connected. Then X and Y are hG-equivalent if and only if their associated algebraic G-spheres, Φ(X) and Φ(Y ) are quasi-isomorphic. After 13 2.3. Algebraic Spheres group completion, there is a one-to-one correspondence between G-spheres up to hG-equivalence and algebraic G-spheres with monotonic dimension functions. Furthermore, every Borel-Smith dimension function is realized, possibly more than one way in low dimensions. The natural place to look for finiteness obstructions of a space X, turns out to be its algebraic model, the chain complex C∗(X;Z): one looks for obstructions to the complex C∗(X;Z) being free. It would therefore seem that, in our attempt to find finiteness conditions on hG-spheres, we should look at the obstructions to freeness of the algebraic analogue of hG-spheres, namely, algebraic G-spheres. The main difference between the two ideas is that by algebraic G-sphere we mean a family of p-adic chain complexes, one for each prime p dividing the order of G, instead of a single chain complex C∗(X;Z). 14 3The Rank of V (G) and Vw(G) We have seen that for a fixed group G, the collection of G-homotopy rep- resentations or hG-spheres forms a monoid, V +(G) or V +w (G), under the operation of join. As preliminary question, one may ask for the rank of these monoids. We instead compute the rank of the group completed ob- jects. These ranks may be computed, indirectly, by determining the rank of Dim(V (G)). 3.1 The Rank Computation In this section, we recall a result of tom Dieck and Petrie which computes the rank of V (G). A new proof of the lower bound is given; this is an improvement over the old proof as it is straightforward to write down a rational basis for V (G) using the new method of proof. As a corollary, this result also computes the rank of Vw(G). We will use the dimension functions of homotopy representations to com- pute the rank of V (G). Recall that each homotopy representation has an associated dimension function. We can use these to construct a natural map from V (G) to C(G). Lemma 3.1.1 (tom Dieck-Petrie). The associated mapping Dim : V (G)→ C(G) is a homomorphism and its image, Dim(V (G)), is torsion free. Fur- thermore, the kernel of this mapping is torsion, and so the rank of V (G) is the same as the rank of DimV (G). Remark 3.1.2. It is worth mentioning that there is no kernel when working with hG-spheres. 15 3.1. The Rank Computation As with linear representations, we have the notion of an induced homo- topy representation. The dimension function of an induced representation behaves as expected. Indeed, if X is a G-homotopy representation, and H is a subgroup of G then DimIndGH(X)(K) = ∑ Ki Dim(X)(Ki), where the action of K on G/H decomposes into orbits as ∐ K/Ki. In view of lemma 3.1.1, determining the rank of DimV (G) is an inter- esting problem. This will be the main result of this section. Theorem 3.1.3 (tom Dieck-Petrie). The rank of DimV (G) is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of subgroups of G that are cyclic after abelian- ization, i.e. rk(DimV (G)) = |{H ∈ ϕ(G)|H/H ′ is cyclic}|. This theorem is the result of the following lemmas presented below. First, we show that for every subgroup of G whose abelianization is cyclic, we can produce a certain homotopy representation. This collection turns out to be linearly independent. Next, using the so called Borel conditions, which give restrictions on dimension functions of homotopy representations, we give an upper bound for the rank of Dim(V (G)). Lemma 3.1.4 (tom Dieck-Petrie). Let G be a finite group with G/G′ cyclic. Then there exists a homotopy representation X of G such that Dim(X)(H) = 0 if and only if H 6= G. Proof. Construct the appropriate Brieskorn Variety. Lemma 3.1.5 (tom Dieck-Petrie). The corank of DimV (G) ⊗ Q in C(G) is at least the cardinality of the set {H ∈ ϕ(G)|H/H ′ is not cyclic} Proof. If H/H ′ is not cyclic, then there exists a normal subgroup K of H such that H/K ∼= Cp ×Cp for some prime p. Then the Borel condition lifts 16 3.1. The Rank Computation to H to give a linear relation lH = eH + ∑ K<H aKeK where lH(Dim(X)) = 0 for all X ∈ V (G). Here eH is the evaluation map at H and aK ∈ Q. Thus each such H corresponds to a relation in C(G), and so the corank of DimV (G)⊗Q in C(G) is at most the size of {H ∈ ϕ(G)|H/H ′ is not cyclic}. We are now ready to prove the above theorem: Proof of Theorem 3.1.3. By Lemma 3.1.5 we have an upper bound on the rank of DimV (G)⊗Q. To show that this is indeed the rank, tom Dieck and Petrie [19] used the module structure of V (G) over A(G). However this can be done directly. Let A ⊂ ϕ(G) be the subset of ϕ(G) containing all conjugacy classes (H) such that H/H ′ is cyclic. For each H ∈ A, construct a homotopy representation XH as in Proposition 3.1.4 and consider the collection of corresponding dimension functions after inducing them up to G: { DimIndGH(XH) } H∈A . This set is linearly independent in DimV (G)⊗Q. Consider the matrix (aij) with aij = DimIndGHiXHi(Hj) with Hi ∈ A and Hj ∈ ϕ(G). Notice that (aij) is upper-triangular as the first nonzero entry of DimIndGHi(XHi)(−) occurs at Hi. Thus the rank is exactly the size of {H|H/H ′ is cyclic}. 17 3.2. Examples Since Lemma 3.1.5 is concerned only with dimension functions, and each homotopy representation gives rise to an element of Vw(G), we have the following version of Theorem 3.1.3: Theorem 3.1.6. The rank of DimVw(G) is given by: rk(DimVw(G)) = | { H ∈ ϕp(G)|H/H ′ is cyclic } |. In addition, this result gives a comparison of the work of tom Dieck- Petrie with that of Grodal-Smith. The projection map below, simply con- siders a dimension function on all subgroups as a dimension function on subgroups of prime power order. Corollary 3.1.7. The natural projection from DimV (G) to DimVw(G) is a surjection after tensoring with Q. The above mapping is not, in general, surjective before tensoring with Q. As an example, consider the symmetric group on three letters. The dimension function (0, 0, 2) is not in the image of the above projection map without rationalizing. 3.2 Examples In this section, we use the results above to compute a basis for V (G) for several different groups. We compare these to the more natural, but more difficult to compute, basis of non-virtual representations. Although a basis for Σ3 was constructed in [19], the method used was ad hoc, and does not easily generalize to larger groups. The current method gives one basis element for each subgroup of G whose abelianization is cyclic. As the group Σ3 will be discussed in more detail in chapter 4, we provide a basis here: 18 3.2. Examples Example 3.2.1. Consider the symmetric group on three letters, G = Σ3. A basis for DimV (G), computed by inducing up from subgroups whose abelian- ization is cyclic: e C2 C3 Σ3 DimIndGe (Xe)(−) 6 3 2 1 DimIndGC2(XC2)(−) 0 1 0 1 DimIndGC3(XC3)(−) 0 0 4 2 DimIndGΣ3(XΣ3)(−) 0 0 0 2 The above basis may be rewritten more familiarly as follows: e C2 C3 Σ3 Dim1(−) 1 1 1 1 DimX(−) 1 0 1 0 DimY (−) 2 1 0 0 DimZ(−) 4 0 0 0. A more complicated example: Example 3.2.2. Let G = A4, the alternating group on four letters. Then ϕ(G) = {e, C2, C3, V4, A4}, and the only subgroup that does not have a cyclic abelianization is V4. Thus the rank of V (G) is 4. A basis for DimV (G)⊗Q 19 3.2. Examples as constructed in Theorem 3.1.3 is presented in the table below. e C2 C3 V4 A4 DimIndGe (Xe)(−) 12 6 4 3 1 DimIndGC2(XC2)(−) 0 2 0 3 1 DimIndGC3(XC3)(−) 0 0 2 0 2 DimIndGA4(XA4)(−) 0 0 0 0 2 This basis is Z-equivalent to e C2 C3 V4 A4 Dim(1) 1 1 1 1 1 Dim(X) 2 2 0 2 0 Dim(Y ) 3 1 1 0 0 Dim(Z) 6 2 0 0 0 where 1, X and Y are linear. 20 4Finiteness Conditions 4.1 Finiteness Conditions for G-spaces It is often useful to consider a space X with a group action as a diagram of fixed points. In other words, we think of X as a functor over some orbit category Γ. When using the usual notion of G-homotopy equivalence, our preferred viewpoint is to consider a G-space X as a diagram over Γ = O(G). With this in mind, we begin with a result about finiteness conditions for diagrams, which is a generalization of Wall’s classical result. The proof follows the original, found in [20]. Before we state the theorem, we introduce a definition: Definition 4.1.1. Let R be a ring, Γ a small category, RΓ-mod the category of contravariant functors Γ → R-mod, and D a Γ-CW-complex (a diagram of CW-complexes with the shape of Γ) . Define the fundamental category of the Γ-CW-complex D, denoted by Π(Γ, D), as the homotopy colimit of the contravariant functor Γ→ {groupoids} defined object-wise via γ → Π(D(γ)). See [11] for further explanation and results concerning the fundamental category. We may now introduce the following theorem: Theorem 4.1.2. Let R be a ring, Γ a small category, RΓ-mod the category of contravariant functors Γ → R-mod, and D a Γ-CW-complex whose fun- 21 4.1. Finiteness Conditions for G-spaces damental category Π(Γ, D) is trivial. Moreover, suppose that D satisfies the following additional properties: i. H∗(D) = 0 for all ∗ > n, and ii. Hn+1(D;M) = 0 for all RΓ-modules M . Then D is equivalent to a finite dimensional complex Γ-CW-complex K. Furthermore, if K has trivial finiteness obstruction σ(K) ∈ K̃0(RΓ), then K may be assumed to be finite. Before proceeding with the proof, we begin with the following lemma, which allows us to recognize the cofiber of the (n−1)-skeleton approximation map as a projective module. Lemma 4.1.3. Let D be as above. We may assume that D is a I-CW- complex with (n − 1)-skeleton Dn−1. Then the cofiber of the inclusion map Dn−1 → D has projective homology. Proof. Let D be as above. Let C be the cofiber of the inclusion map. Then we have the following equalities: Hn(C) = Hn(D,Dn−1) = Cn(D)/Bn(D), where Cn and Bn are the n-chains and n-boundaries respectively. To show that Hn(C) is projective, we will show that it is a direct summand of the free module Cn(D). Begin by considering the following diagram: Cn+2 d Cn+1 d c // Bn j // Cn. Cn ∃s <<y y y y 22 4.1. Finiteness Conditions for G-spaces Since C∗ = C∗(D) is a chain complex, d2 = 0. Furthermore, we may identify the composition jc as jc = d. Thus we see that 0 = d2 = jcd, and so cd = 0. This implies that c is a cocycle. Notice that Bn(D) is an RΓ-module and Π(Γ, D) is trivial, so Hn+1(D;Bn(D)) = 0 by assumption. Therefore, since the cohomology vanishes, c is a coboundary as well. Hence there exists a map s : Cn → Bn such that c = sd = sjc. The map c is surjective, and so we may conclude that the composition sj is an identity. Thus the sequence Bn(D) j // Cn(D) sqq // Hn(D/Dn−1) splits and so Hn(D/Dn−1) = Hn(C) is a direct summand of the free module Cn(D), and hence is projective. We are now ready to prove theorem 4.1.2. Proof of Theorem 4.1.2. Let C be the cofiber of the inclusion map j : Dn−1 → D. Denote its homology, which is projective by the previous lemma, by P = Hn(C). LetQ be a projectiveRΓ module such that the sum, F = P⊕Q, is free. Write F ′ = P ⊕Q⊕ P ⊕ . . . ∼= ⊕ F ∼= ⊕ i∈I (F i)si , where F i is the free functor generated at i ∈ I. First, wedge on the free cell Sn−1 × F i, for each generator of our free module F ′. Denote the resulting diagram by K = Dn−1 ∨ ∨ F ′ (Sn−1 × F i). 23 4.1. Finiteness Conditions for G-spaces Next, trivially extend the map j to K by mapping the wedge of free cells to a point (the constant diagram). Write CK for the cofiber of modified map j ∨ ∗ : K → D. The above diagrams may be arranged as follows: Dn−1 j // D // C K j∨∗ // D // CK ∨ F ′(S n−1 × F i) // ∗ Since everything in sight is a cofiber sequence, the cofiber of the 3rd vertical map is homotopy equivalent to the cofiber of the 3rd horizontal map, which is clearly, Σ(∨F ′(Sn−1 × F i)). Thus the map C ↪→ CK , gives rise to the cofiber sequence C → CK → Σ(∨F ′(Sn−1 × F i)), which induces a long exact sequence in homology which splits (since K dominates Dn−1) and so Hn(CK) ∼= Hn(C)⊕ F ′ = P ⊕ F ′ ∼= F ′ is free. Now attach n-cells ∐ F ′ Dn × F i to K via the attaching maps F ′ ∼= Hn(CK) ∼= pin(CK) ∂−→ pin−1(K). Denote by L the result of attaching these cells to K. Finally, consider the 24 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres cofibration given by the map CK → CL: CK → CL → CK,L. It induces a long exact sequence in homology which was constructed such that (a) Hn(CK,L) = 0 for all i 6= n, and (b) Hn(CK) = 0 for all i 6= n. In addition, in dimension n, we have the exact sequence 0 // Hn(CL,K) ∼= // Hn(CK) // 0. Thus Hn(CL) = 0 for all i ≥ 0 and hence D is equivalent to a finite dimen- sional I-CW-complex. We may define the finiteness obstruction of K by σ(K) = (−1)nHn(C) Where, as above, C is the cofiber of the inclusion of the n − 1 skeleton. If σ(K) vanishes, then Hn(C) is stably free. That is there is a f.g. free module F such that Hn(C)⊕F = F ′ is free. Since F ′ is a f.g. free module, we only need to attach finitely many cells in the above argument. 4.2 Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres In this section, we begin an investigation into finiteness obstructions for hG-spheres. When working with the notion of hG-homotopy equivalence, the appropriate diagrams to consider are ones over the p-orbit categories of G. By the work of [7] discussed in section 2.3 we know that two G- spheres over the p-orbit categories are equivalent if and only if they have the same dimension function. As a first step to determining when an hG- sphere X is equivalent to a finite complex, we investigate when X has a finite Γp-replacement. By a finite Γp-replacement, we mean a finite diagram 25 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres Y (possibly over a larger category), whose mod-p homology agrees with X at each p-subgroup of G. At first glance, it would appear that the finiteness obstruction given in section 4.1, applied to Γp, would provide the correct answer to question 1.0.3 of the introduction. However, as the following example demonstrates, this is far too restrictive. Instead, theorem 4.1.2 applied to Γp, provides an obstruction to which G-spheres are realizable on a finite complex with isotropy in Fp. Example 4.2.1. Consider the R3Oop3 (Σ3) space consisting of two points, with trivial action. Its reduced chain complex consists of the trivial functor in dimension zero. The diagram category has the following shape: Σ3/C3C2 C2 // // Σ3/e Σ3tt There are two free functors, namely FΣ3/C3(γ) = { R3C2 if γ = Σ3/C3 R3C2 if γ = Σ3/e and FΣ3/e(γ) = { 0 if γ = Σ3/C3 R3Σ3 if γ = Σ3/e Notice that the free resolution of the trivial functor is not finite dimensional. Indeed, the resolution evaluated at the orbit Σ3/e is a resolution of R3 by R3C2-modules and R3Σ3-modules, and such a resolution is infinite dimen- sional since both C2 and Σ3 are 2-periodic at the prime 3. More generally, when G is not a p-group, the trivial functor does not have a finite resolution by free modules over the p-orbit category. It is worth noting, however, that such a complex does have a finite projective resolution: Remark 4.2.2. Recall that even though the trivial functor over the p-orbit category may not have a finite resolution of free modules, it always has a 26 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres finite resolution by projectives, a result first proved in [10]. This is also verified by the work of [7]: simply apply theorem 2.3.3, as stated in the introduction, to the sphere S0. It is certainly reasonable to ask that S0 be a finite Γp-replacement for the hG-sphere corresponding to the trivial functor in the previous example. The reason the obstruction theory given in section 4.1 does not allow for such a replacement is that as a complex over the p-orbit category, its non- p-group isotropy is empty. In what follows we relax this condition, allowing for arbitrary isotropy at non-p-groups, in order to avoid this example. We are therefore led to consider not only modules that are free over RpΓp, but modules that arise as restrictions of free modules over RpΓ (the latter clearly including the former). With this in mind, we make the following definition. Definition 4.2.3. An RpΓp module M is said to be pseudo-free if it is the restriction of a free module on the full orbit category RpΓ. That is to say M(−) = ResΓΓpFx(−), where Fx(y) = RpMorΓ(y, x) for some x ∈ Γ. Pseudo-free modules have the following properties: Lemma 4.2.4. Let M be a pseudo-free RpΓp-module. Then (a) M(G/e) = RpMor(G/e,G/D) = Rp[G/D], for some D < G, (b) M(G/e) is a p-permutation module, and (c) M has finite projective dimension. Proof. Part (a) follows from the fact that the Γp is a full subcategory of Γ, and part (b) from the definition of p-permutation module. Part (c) follows from the more general result, ‘Rim’s Theorem for Orbit Categories’ and Corollary 3.12 of [9]. One shows that ResGP (RpMor(−, G/D)) has finite projective dimension if a Sylow p-subgroup of D is an object of Γp. The proof relies on induction on the length of the module M , with the base case established by the classical result of Rim. 27 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres Our motivating example suggests that we should consider extensions of RpΓp-modules instead of RpΓp-modules themselves. Although we will not place any requirements on the non-p-group isotropy, it appears that we will still need to keep track of it. In order to accomplish this, we need a way of extending modules to the full orbit category. There are two natural ways of extending functors along the inclusion Γp ↪→ Γ, based on the left and right Kan extensions. We recall the definitions of the left and right Kan extensions. The following definition can be found in [12]. Definition 4.2.5. Let ι be an inclusion of categories ι : C → D and a F a functor F : C → E. If C is small and E is cocomplete, then there exists a left Kan extension Lanι(F ) of F along ι defined at each object d ∈ D by Lanι(F )(d) = colimι↓dF (c), where the colimit is taken over the comma category (ι ↓ d). The right Kan extension, denoted Ranι(−), is defined dually. The left Kan extension behaves like an inclusion. More concretely, the functor Lan(−) takes an RpΓp moduleM and extends it to RpΓ by assigning a value of zero to the non-p-subgroups. More interestingly, the right Kan extension is not a simple inclusion. However the functor Ran(−) on the category of RpΓp modules adds norm-type elements which is not desirable for our purposes. It would be more useful to have a functor that ‘recovered’, in some sense, a free functor on the entire orbit category from its restriction to the p-orbit category. The Brauer construction [17] accomplishes this by dividing out the norm elements of the right Kan extension, but, in the process, it kills all of the non-p group values of Ran(M)(−). A better approach is to first factor the RpΓp-module valued functor Mx as the free RpΓp module on the set valued functor Mor(−, x). We then extend Mor(−, x) to the category Γ, using the right Kan extension, and take the free Rp-module on the result. Definition 4.2.6. Let Mx be the pseudo-free RpΓp-module generated at x ∈ 28 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres Γ. That is to say Mx(y) = RpMor(y, x). Extend Mx to Γ by taking the free Rp-module on the right Kan extension: E(Mx)(y) = Rp(RanΓΓp(Mor(y, x))). As discussed, there are many ways to extend modules along the inclusion Γp ↪→ Γ, however the free module on the right Kan extension has evident advantages. Lemma 4.2.7. The extension E : RpΓp → RpΓ is an honest extension, that is to say E(M)(G/P ) =M(G/P ) for all p-subgroups P of G. In addition, E sends pseudo-free modules to free modules. In other words, E(ResΓΓPF ) = F where F is a free RpΓ-module. Proof. The first statement follows from the fact that the inclusion of Γp into Γ is an inclusion of a full subcategory. The second statement can be broken into three cases: Let F be a free Γ-functor at G/D, where D is a p-group. Since E is an honest extension, E(ResΓΓpF )(−) = F (−) on p-groups. Since Mor(G/H,G/K) = ∅ if Kg H for all g ∈ G, the value of E(ResΓΓpF )(−) is zero elsewhere. Hence E(ResΓΓpF ) = F . Now suppose that F is free at G/D, a where D is a q-group, q a prime distinct from p. Then ResΓΓp(F ) is the module ResΓΓpF (G/N) = G/D if N = e0 otherwise. It is only necessary to compute the extension at subgroups of D, as E(ResΓΓpF ) is clearly zero elsewhere. Let Q ≤ D. The extension at G/Q is 29 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres computed by taking the free Rp-module on the limit of the arrow category G/Q G/Q // ... // G/e Goo . Notice that this limit may be computed by finding the isotropy of one of the |G/Q| arrows, this isotropy subgroup is Q, and then computing the fixed points of said arrow’s target under the action of Q. Thus the value of E(ResΓΓpF )(−) evaluated at Q is given by the following: E(ResΓΓpF )(Q) = Rp((G/D) Q) = Rp {g ∈ G|Qg ≤ D} /D = F (G/Q) as desired. Finally, for composite subgroups, we proceed in a similar fashion. Let F be free at a composite subgroup D of G. When computing the value at a subgroup Q of D, we first note that we only need to consider the arrows from the orbit G/Q to the trivial orbit G/e, since the group action moves all of the other arrows here. The argument is then the same as the p′ case. The above lemma suggests that pseudo-free modules will play an impor- tant role in our theory. It will therefore be necessary to determine when a complex is equivalent to a complex of pseudo-free modules. As such we introduce the following obstruction. Definition 4.2.8. Let X be a finite dimensional chain complex of projective RpΓp modules whose top dimension is n. Define the pseudo-free finiteness obstruction of X, denoted by σp(X) ∈ K̃0(RpΓp)/I, as the alternating sum σp(X) = n∑ i=0 (−1)i[Xi]. 30 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres Generators of the ideal I are given as the alternating sum of the projective resolution of restrictions of free modules. More concretely, a generator i ∈ I has the following form: i = ∑ (−1)n[Pn(Res(F ))], where P∗(Res(F )) is a projective resolution of the restriction of the free RpΓ-module F . It is necessary to use projective resolutions of elements in the image, since the functor Res : RpΓ−mod→ RpΓp−mod does not preserve projectives; however, as can be seen from lemma 4.2.4, this definition still makes sense because the restriction functor takes free modules to modules of finite projective dimension, ensuring that the alternating sum in the above definition is well defined. Notice that this obstruction will vanish if the usual obstruction vanishes, but also vanishes on our motivating example. We collect various facts about σp in the following proposition: Proposition 4.2.9. Let X and Y be a finite dimensional chain complexes of projective RpΓp-modules. (a) If X and Y are chain homotopy equivalent, then σp(X) = σp(Y ). (b) If σp(X) = 0 then X is chain homotopy equivalent to a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. pseudo-free RpΓp-modules. (c) If σp(X) = 0 then there is a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free RpΓ-modules Y , such that ResΓΓp(Y ) = X. Proof. To prove part (a), note that the cofiber C, of the map X ' // Y is contractible. Its chain complex is therefore split, and hence σp(C) = 0. Since σp is additive, we are done. 31 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres For part (b), assume that Xi = 0 for i > n where n is a positive integer. Then after adding complexes of the form P 1 // P , where P is a projective RpΓp-module, we may assume that X has the following form: 0→ Q fn−→ Fn−1 → . . .→ F0 → 0, where each Fi (respectively Q) is a free (respectively projective) RpΓp- module. Since σp is invariant under chain homotopy, we have 0 = σp(X) ∼= σp(Q), thus Q is equivalent to some pseudo-free RpΓ module. We now have a finite dimensional chain complex of pseudo-free RpΓp- modules which we would like to extend to RpΓ. However, the extension of Q to the free RpΓ-module E(Q) is not compatible with the map fn. The extension would be non-empty at p′-subgroups, and therefore, necessarily map to zero. We fix this by wedging on an additional copy of Q. SinceQ is projective, there is a projective module P , such that P⊕Q ∼= F is free. Thus, without altering the homology, we may add the complex P 1−→ P in dimension n: 0→ P −→ Q ⊕ P fn−→ Fn−1 → . . .→ F0 → 0. After writing P ⊕Q as F and adding the complex Q 1−→ Q in dimension n, we have 0→ P ⊕ Q −→ F ⊕ Q fn⊕0−−−→ Fn−1 → . . .→ F0 → 0. The above complex is equivalent to the following complex: 0→ F −→ F ⊕ Q fn⊕0−−−→ Fn−1 → . . .→ F0 → 0. This is now a complex of free RpΓp-modules, except for Q in dimension n 32 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres which is pseudo-free, and maps to zero. It is this zero map that will allow us to extend the complex to RpΓ. For part (c), extend the modified complex obtained above, from Ch(RpΓp) to Ch(RpΓ), using Lan(−) except at the pseudo-free module Q in dimension n. Extend Q via the extension E(−), to the free module E(Q)(−). This is possible because the attaching map of E(Q)(−) is trivial. Call the extended complex Y . Since Lan(−) clearly preserves free modules and E(Q)(−) is free by lemma 4.2.7, Y is a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free RpΓ-modules whose restriction to RpΓp is X. In particular X and Y have the same homology at p-groups. Remark 4.2.10. It is worth mentioning that extensions to the full orbit category are, in general, not unique. There are several pseudo free complexes with the same p-group homology. In fact the non-p group isotropy may not even be a sphere. It is this non-uniqueness property that makes the global finiteness obstruction, discussed in the next section, difficult. The following example demonstrates the non-uniqueness of such exten- sions. Example 4.2.11. Let G = Σ3. The following two chain complexes, in fact algebraic Σ3-spheres, of free R3Γ-modules have the same homology for prime ordered subgroups at the prime p = 3, i.e. the cyclic subgroup C3 and the trivial subgroup e. They are clearly not equal as complexes over R3Γ, but they are both equivalent after restriction to R3Γ3 to the complex whose dimension function is (0, 4). 33 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres The first R3Γ-sphere has dimension function (0, 0, 2, 4), [3] R3[Σ3] f3 [2] R3[Σ3]⊕R3[Σ3] f2 [1] R3 0 R3[Σ3]⊕R3[Σ3/C2] f1⊕0 [0] R3 1 R3[Σ3/C2] [−1] R3 R3 R3 R3 Σ3/Σ3 Σ3/C3 Σ3/C2 Σ3/e and the second R3Γ-sphere has dimension function (0, 0, 0, 4) [3] R3[Σ3] g3 [2] R3[Σ3]⊕R3[Σ3] g2 [1] R3[Σ3]⊕R3[Σ3] g1 [0] R3[Σ3] [−1] R3 R3 R3 R3 Σ3/Σ3 Σ3/C3 Σ3/C2 Σ3/e Notice that after restricting to the 3-orbit category, both are equivalent to the 34 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres complex of projective R3Γ3-modules which has dimension function (0, 4). [3] R3P+ p3 [2] R3P− p2 [1] R3P− p1 [0] R3P+ p0 [−1] R3 R3 Σ3/C3 Σ3/e If fact any Borel-Smith dimension function (0, 0,m, 4), where 0 ≤ m ≤ 4, has such a restriction. Let us restate our work up to this point. Given an hG-sphere X we would like to determine if there is a mod-p equivalent space Y that is finite dimensional or finite. So we look at the algebraic G-sphere associated to X. It is a finite dimensional chain complex of projectives. We modify it so that it is a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free modules except, possibly, in the penultimate dimension. Based on example 4.2.1, we know it is not enough to produce a chain complex over RpΓp, so we must extend our chain complex to RpΓ. Now that we have a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free RpΓ modules we can use a modification of a lemma of Pamuk, found in [14], to build a space whose chain complex has the same homology at the p- groups. As our current chain complex has empty homology at non-p-groups, we will need to suspend our complex to fix this. We are now ready to introduce the main theorem of this section. Theorem 4.2.12. Let X be an hG-sphere whose p-fixed points are at least 35 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres 3-connected. Then X is hG-equivalent to a finite dimensional complex. Fur- thermore, if σp(C∗(X)) = 0, then there is a finite space Y whose mod-p homology at p-groups agrees with that of X, that is to say X has a finite Γp replacement. Proof. As discussed above, if the obstruction σp(C∗(X)) vanishes, then we may construct a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free modules over the full orbit category, Γ, whose homology at p-groups agrees with that of X. The proof then follows the standard argument of building a space from a chain complex of free modules, with the exception of how to attach free cells. That result is presented as a lemma below. Once we show that we can attach free cells, we proceed by induction. The induction begins with the chain complex for the classifying space, EΓ, of the category Γ. Such a space always exists: see, for example, [9]. We require that the p-fixed points of X are at least 3-connected so that we may replace the first few stages of our free chain complex with the chains on EΓ. Finally, after constructing the space Y , we note that the dimension function of Y is the same (on p-groups) as the dimension function of X. Thus, by [7], they have the same mod-p hG-homotopy type. The following lemma is adapted from [9] or [14]. In those cases, the au- thors were concerned with attaching F-cells over the orbit category OF (G). In the present version we will be attaching Fp-cells over the entire orbit category O(G). Lemma 4.2.13. Let X(−) be a finite G-CW-complex. Suppose that we are given a free RpΓ module F (−) and a RpΓ module homomorphism ϕ : F (−)→ Hn(X(−);Rp), for some n ≥ 2. Assume further that (a) if Rp[G/P ](−) is a summand of F (−), then X(G/P ) is (n − 1) connected for every p-group P of G; and (b) if Rp[G/D](−) is a summand of F (−), for any non-p group D, then the restriction of ϕ to Rp[G/D](−) is trivial, i.e. ϕ|Rp[G/D](−) = 0. 36 4.2. Local Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres Then by attaching (n + 1)-cells to X, we can obtain a G-CW-complex Y such that Hi(X(−);Rp) ∼= Hi(Y (−);Rp), for i 6= n, n+ 1, and Hn+1(X(−);Rp) ↪→ Hn+1(Y (−);Rp)→ F → Hn(X(−);Rp) Hn(Y (−);Rp) is exact for all p-groups P . Proof. We attach a wedge of Γ-spheres, with the appropriate actions; for the free p-cells corresponding to Rp[G/P ], we attach them to XP using the homotopy groups of XP and then extend them equivariantly, for the free cells generated by non-p groups, we simply wedge them on to X via the zero map. Specifically, we do the following procedure: Let Z be a wedge of n-dimensional Γ-spheres such that Hn(Z;Rp) = F . We construct a map Z → X that will realize ϕ one summand at a time. For summands of the form Rp[G/P ], where P is a p-group, our assumptions on the connectivity of XP imply that Hn(XP ;Rp) ∼= pin(XP ). Therefore elements in the image, ϕ(Rp[G/P ](P )), correspond to maps egP : Sn → XP . Extend these maps equivariantly to a map eP : Sn×G/P → X. For the non-p-group cells, Rp[G/D](−), define eD : Sn × G/D → X to be zero. In this way we construct a map e : Z → X that realizes ϕ on homology. Let Y be the cofiber of e : Z → X. Such a construction satisfies the exact sequence given above. 37 4.3. Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres 4.3 Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres In the previous section, we constructed a finite replacement for X at a prime p. In general, there may exist many replacements whose homology differs at non p-groups. In order to construct a global finiteness replacement, we must ensure that the homology of extensions from different primes is somehow compatible. In this section, we begin an investigation into a global finiteness condition. For hG-spheres, the compatibility is verified via the p- dimension functions. This allows one to determine the finiteness of an hG- sphere based on its dimension function, something easy to verify, instead of a K̃0 obstruction. The problem of globally realizing a given hG-sphere on a finite complex can be broken down into steps, seen below in the following diagram: Diagram 4.3.1. ⊕ p||G| Ch(RpΓp) // i Ch(ZΓ) // CW∗ ⊕ p||G| Ch(RpΓ) r RR g <<xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Given a collection of finite dimensional chain complexes, { C(p) } p||G|, of projective RpΓp-modules representing X, we first extend these complexes from the p-orbit category, Γp, to the full orbit category Γ. Call these mod- ified complexes C̃(p). Such an extension is a necessary step, as seen in the previous section, since there are examples of finite (even linear) hG-spheres whose ‘finiteness obstruction’ over RpΓp is nontrivial. Next, we show that if the collection { C̃(p) } p||G| satisfies a compatibility condition, which can be verified by the dimension functions of each complex, we can use a Postnikov tower to glue them together. This resulting complex, 38 4.3. Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres C, is a finite dimensional chain complex of projective ZΓ-modules. This complex has the property that C ⊗ Rp = C̃(p) for all primes p dividing the order of G. Furthermore, the dimension functions the original complexes,{ C(p) } p||G|, will also satisfy this compatibility condition. We then determine when the obstruction, which lives in K̃0(ZΓ), to C being homotopy equivalent to a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free modules vanishes on the image of g. When this is the case, C is homotopy equivalent to a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free ZΓ-modules. Finally, we verify that the chain complex C satisfies the conditions of [14], in order to construct a finite complex X ∈ V +w (G) that realizes C. When G is the group CpoCq, where p and q are distinct primes such that q|p−1 and Cq acts by conjugation on Cp, the above discussion is summarized by the following theorem, which will we will prove below. Theorem 4.3.2. Let G = Cp o Cq where p and q are distinct primes such that q|p − 1. An hG-sphere X is realizable on a finite complex if and only if q divides DimX(G/e) − DimX(G/Cp) where DimX(−) is the dimension function of X. When q = 2, all hG-spheres are realizable on a finite complex. This result immediately gives conditions on larger groups containing cyclic subgroups acting on quotients: Corollary 4.3.3. Let G be any finite group, and X an hG-sphere with dimension function Dim(X). Let G contain subgroups H / K / M < G, where M/K ∼= Cq acts faithfully on K/H ∼= Cp. If X is realizable on a finite complex then q divides DimX(H)−DimX(K). The above corollary suggests the following conjectural answer to question 1.0.2 posed in the introduction: Conjecture 4.3.4. Let G be any finite group, and X an hG-sphere with dimension function Dim(X). Then X is realizable on a finite complex if and only if qr divides DimX(H) − DimX(K) for all chains of subgroups H /K /M < G, where M/K ∼= Cqr acts faithfully on K/H ∼= Cp. 39 4.3. Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres The sufficiency of such congruencies is indicated by the classification virtual homotopy representations. Recall the result of Bauer [1], which con- cludes that the homotopy representations that are realizable as a difference of finite homotopy representations are those whose dimension functions sat- isfy the congruencies given above. Theorem 4.3.2 will be proved as a consequence of the following lemmas. The proof of the first lemma will be deferred to section 4.5. Lemma 4.3.5. In diagram 4.3.1, the map r is onto when G is the group of order pqr where faithful Cqr acts faithfully by conjugation on Cp. Conse- quently, every dimension function defined on the primes orbit category has a (non-unique) extension to the full orbit category. In the next proposition, we examine the numerical condition needed to insure that a given pair of RlΓl chain complexes, l ∈ {p, q}, lifts via the map g to a chain complex of ZΓ-modules. Proposition 4.3.6. When G is the metacyclic group of order pq, a pair of chain complexes, C(p) and C(q), lifts to a chain complex over ZΓ if and only if 2q divides DimX(G/e)−Dim(G/Cp). Before we prove the proposition, we recall the following definition and an associated lemma. Definition 4.3.7. A family of chain complexes { C(l) } l of RlΓ-modules is said to be compatible if there exists a finitely generated ZΓ module H∗ such that Hi ⊗ Zl = Hi(C(l)). We may now ask for conditions on the compatibility of chain complexes. The following lemma does exactly that. Lemma 4.3.8. When G is the metacyclic group of order pq, a pair of chain complexes, C(p) and C(q), is compatible if and only if 2q divides DimX(G/e)−DimX(G/Cp). 40 4.3. Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres Proof. Let n = DimX(G/e) and m = DimX(G/Cp). Since the Weil group of Cp, given by WG(CP ) = NG(Cp)/Cp = Cq, acts on XCp , it acts on the homology of XCP as well. Since X is a sphere, C(p)(−) is a chain complex starting with the one dimensional RpΓ module Rωp (−) for some root of unity ω. Here Rωp (−) is given by Rωp (γ) = Rωp for all γ ∈ Γ, and Rωp denotes the module Rp together with the Cq action of multiplication by ω. Notice that there are q such projective RpΓ modules corresponding to the splitting of the free RpΓ module FG/Cp(γ) = { RpCq if γ = Cp, e 0 else into projectives. The finitely generated module H∗ exists if and only if the Weil group of Cp acts trivially on bothHn(C(p)(G/e);Rp) = Rp andHm(C(p)(G/Cp);Rp) = Rp. Thus both C(p)(G/e) and C(p)(G/Cp) are resolutions of Rωp , which end with Rp. This can occur if and only if 2q, the period of Cq, divides DimX(G/e)−DimX(G/Cp). Proposition 4.3.6 then follows from a standard Postnikov tower argument (given in [9]): it can be shown that a compatible family of p-local chain com- plexes lifts to an integral chain complex. The argument involving Postnikov towers given here is due to Dold [3]. We recall the proof for completeness: Proof of Proposition 4.3.6. We construct the ZΓ chain complex C by induc- tion. Let C0 = P (H0), where P (H0) is a projective resolution of H0. If Hi is trivial, then let Ci = Ci−1. Otherwise note that Exti+1ZΓ (Ci−1,Hi) ∼= ⊕ p||G| Exti+1RpΓ(Ci−1 ⊗Rp,Hi ⊗Rp) = ⊕ p||G| Exti+1RpΓ(C (p) i−1,H (p) i ) 41 4.3. Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres holds whenever i + 1 > l(Ci−1) + hdim(Ci−1). This condition is satisfied trivially when G has order pq. Thus the Postnikov invariants of Ci are determined by its p-adic Postnikov invariants. In order to utilize the theory of finiteness obstructions over ZΓ, some preliminaries are in order. For instance, it is not obvious that the complex C constructed from the Postnikov tower approximation has finite homologi- cal dimension. However, recall that proposition 2.2.3 states that an integral Γ chain complex is finite dimensional if its p-completions are finite dimen- sional for all p||G|. Since our starting complexes C(p) and C(q) were finite dimensional , it is indeed the case that our integral complex C is equivalent to a finite dimensional chain complex as well. Since we have now shown that our gluing operation results in a finite complex, it makes sense to talk about a finiteness obstruction (as the al- ternating sum will be finite) on the image of g. The proof of the following lemma will be postponed until section 4.5. Lemma 4.3.9. For the metacyclic group of order pq, the finiteness obstruc- tion vanishes on the image of the map g in diagram 4.3.1. Proof. See Section 4.5. Thus we may assume that C is a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free modules. To construct a finite CW-complex X from the chain complex C we appeal to the following theorem of Pamuk [14]: Theorem 4.3.10 (Pamuk). Let C be a finite dimensional chain complex of f.g. free ZΓ-modules. Suppose that C is an n-Moore complex such that dim(C(H)) ≥ 3 for all H < G. Suppose further that Ci(H) = 0 for all i > dim(C(H)) + 1, and all H. Then there is a finite G-CW-complex Z such that C(Z(−),Z) is chain homotopy equivalent to C as chain complexes of ZΓ-modules. In order to apply the above theorem to our chain complex C, we must first modify it so that it satisfies the necessary gap hypothesis. In order to 42 4.3. Global Finiteness Conditions for hG-spheres do so, we use proposition 2.2.4. Notice that when G is the metacyclic group of order pq, and Dim(−) is any non-trivial dimension function, l(H,K) is at most one whenever Dim(H) = Dim(K). Thus by using proposition 2.2.4, we may assume that C is equivalent to a complex that satisfies the various gap hypotheses. Finally, as in the previous section, notice that the dimension function of the new space Z, is the same as the dimension function of our original hG-sphere X, and so Z and X have the same hG-homotopy type. We now give an example of a complex over the p-orbit category, which cannot be extended to a finite complex over the full orbit category. Example 4.3.11. Let G = C7 o C3 be the metacyclic group of order 21. Let X be the following algebraic sphere over the category R7Γ7: G/C7 R7 G/e R7 R7P1 p1oo Rω7P2, p2oo where Pi is the projective resolution of R7, and ω is a 3rd root of unity in R7. The dimension function of X is (0, 2), and since the difference DimX(G/e)−DimX(G/C7) is not congruent to 0 modulo 3, by theorem 4.3.2, X cannot be extended to a finite integral complex. Explicitly, notice that the of action of G on H2(X(G/e);R7) is non-trivial, and therefore is not compatible with a (nec- essarily trivial) G-action on H2(Y (G/e);R3), where Y any R3Γ3-complex with the homology of a sphere and dimension function (∗, 2). Moreover, X does not even have a finite Γ7-replacement. Indeed its finiteness obstruction σ7(X) = Rω7P2 is non-trivial in K0(R7Γ7)/I. Notice, however, that the 3-fold tensor of X has dimension function (0, 6) and will satisfy the congruence condition, and σ7(X⊗3) = 0 as well. 43 4.4. Examples of Finite hΣ3-spheres 4.4 Examples of Finite hΣ3-spheres In this section, we give a complete picture of the monoids V +(Σ3) and V +w (Σ3). Notice that all of the obstructions for a given hΣ3-sphere to be hG-equivalent to a finite complex vanish. The congruence condition, DimX(Σ3/C3)−DimX(Σ3/e) ≡ 0 mod 2, is not a new restriction: indeed, it simply a restatement of a Borel-Smith condition. Nonetheless, it is of interest to exhibit several families of finite (non- linear, non-free, non-virtual) Σ3-spheres. These spheres, together with the linear ones, and Swan’s free Σ3 sphere [16], generate V +w (Σ3). Recall that V +(Σ3) is defined on the full orbit category. As a result, to complete the picture for V +(Σ3), we include an additional nontrivial (non smooth) Σ3- sphere. This sphere is, after reduction, equivalent to the trivial sphere. Remark 4.4.1. These results go further than tom Dieck and Petrie in [19] and Mackrodt [13]. In those papers the authors computed the structure of the group completed object V (Σ3). That is to say they only verified that the homotopy representations given below existed virtually. It is much easier to produce the required chain complexes over ⊕ p||G| Zp̂Γ and then glue them together via a Postnikov tower, than to build them over ZΓ directly. The complexes presented below are the result of such a procedure. We will use the following presentation of Σ3: Σ3 = { σ, τ |σ3 = τ2 = e, τστ = σ2} Example 4.4.2. The chain complex given below has dimension function (0, 0, 4, 4). 44 4.4. Examples of Finite hΣ3-spheres [4] Z[Σ3] f4 [3] Z 0 Z[Σ3/C2]⊕ Z[Σ3] 0⊕f3 [2] Z[Σ3] f2 [1] Z[Σ3] f1 [0] Z 1 Z[Σ3/C2] [−1] Z Z Z Z Σ3/Σ3 Σ3/C3 Σ3/C2 Σ3/e The maps fi, 1 ≤ i ≤ 4 are given by f1(e) = 1̄− 2̄ f2(e) = e− στ − σ2τ f3(e) = e− σ2 + σ2τ − τ f4(e) = (e+ σ + στ, 1̄). Example 4.4.3. The chain complex given below has dimension function 45 4.4. Examples of Finite hΣ3-spheres (0, 1, 3, 3). [3] Z[Σ3] f3 [2] Z 0 Z[Σ3/C2]⊕ Z[Σ3] 0⊕f2 [1] Z[Σ3] f1 [0] Z[C2] Z Z[C2]⊕ Z[Σ3/C2] [−1] Z Z Z Z Σ3/Σ3 Σ3/C3 Σ3/C2 Σ3/e The maps fi, 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 are given by f1(e) = (e,−1̄) f2(e) = e− σ + τ − σ2τ f3(e) = (e+ στ + σ2τ, 1). The above complexes are enough to generate all of V +w (Σ3) (see remarks at the end of the section), but we need one more to generate V +(Σ3). Notice that this is an example of a nontrivial sphere that is locally trivial. Example 4.4.4. The chain complex given below has dimension function 46 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 (0, 2, 2, 2). [2] Z[Σ3] f2 [1] Z[C2] N̄ Z 0 Z[C2]⊕ Z[Σ3/C2]⊕ Z[Σ3] f1 [0] Z[C2] Z 1 Z[C2]⊕ Z[Σ3/C2] [−1] Z Z Z Z Σ3/Σ3 Σ3/C3 Σ3/C2 Σ3/e The maps fi, 1 ≤ i ≤ 3 are given by f1(e) = (e,−1̄) f2(e) = e− σ + τ − σ2τ. Since each of these chain complexes is free, (and l(Γp) < 2) we may realize each of them on a finite dimensional CW-complex. By shifting the module in dimension 4 (resp. 3) we can produce chain complexes with dimension functions (0, 4n, 4n) (resp. (1, 3 + 4n, 3 + 4n)). These dimension functions, together with the linear and free dimension func- tions generate all of V +w,f (G) modulo obvious low dimensional requirements. For instance, it is not possible to realize (0,0,2), except as a virtual sphere. 4.5 Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 In this section we present two proofs of 4.3.5 and a proof of 4.3.9. We have two versions of the proof that the restriction map is surjective. 47 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 The first version is for the group of order pq; it is a constructive proof. The second version works for order pqr. Lemma 4.3.5. In diagram 4.3.1, the map r is onto when G is the meta- cyclic group of order pq. Consequently, every dimension function defined on the primes orbit category has a (non-unique) extension to the full orbit category. Proof. We show, by construction, that the following dimension functions exist in Zl̂Γ for l = p, q: G Cp Cq e 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2. One notes that after restricting from Γ to ΓFprimes (i.e. deleting the first column) these dimension functions generate Dim(V +w (G)), and so the map r is onto. (The last dimension function is not needed to describe Vw(G) but is needed for V +(G).) All chain complexes are written over the orbits listed as follows: G/G G/Cp G/Cq G/e. The first two dimension functions above are given by the following projective chain complexes, where R = Zl̂: R R R R RCq N RCq N RCq RCq R R R R 48 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 When l = p, the second two dimension functions are realized by R[G/Cq] (0,1) R 0 R[G/Cq]⊕Rω[G/Cq] 0⊕p0 R 1 R[G/Cq] R R R R and Rω[G/Cq] p0 R[G/Cq] R R R R where ω is a pth root of unity, and p0 is the projective cover of R[G/Cq]. When l = q, the second two dimension functions are realized by Q (0,1,0) R 0 R⊕Q⊕Q (0,0)⊕(0,0)⊕(0,1) R 1 R⊕Q 1⊕0 R R R R 49 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 and R[Cq] N R[Cq] R R R R where the Zq̂Γ-module Q is the nontrivial summand of Zq̂[G/Cq]. The last dimension function is given as R[G/Cq] (0,1,0) R 0 R 0 R⊕R[G/Cq]⊕R[G/Cq] (0,0)⊕(0,0)⊕(,1) R 1 R 1 R⊕R[G/Cq] R R R R when l = p and Q⊕Q R[Cq] N R 0 R[Cq]⊕R[G/Cq]⊕Q⊕Q R[Cq] R 1 R[Cq]⊕R[G/Cq] R R R R when l = q. 50 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 Lemma 4.3.5. In diagram 4.3.1, the map r is onto when G is the meta- cyclic group of order pqr with Crq acting faithfully on Cp. Consequently, every dimension function defined on the primes orbit category has a (non- unique) extension to the full orbit category. Proof. We show that every ‘elementary’ dimension function Dim(−) is real- izable on a finite dimensional chain complex of projectives. By an elementary dimension function, we mean a function Dim(−), where Dim(H) ∈ {0, 2} for all subgroups H of G, for all possible monotonic combinations. These allowable dimension functions are of the following two types: Type I: Dim(H) = 2 if H < Cqs 2 if H = Cp 0 otherwise Type II: Dim(H) = 2 if H < Cqs 0 if H = Cp 0 otherwise for some integer s, where 0 ≤ s ≤ r. Since CpoCqs is normal in G with cyclic quotient, all Type I dimension functions exist (even integrally). Note that Type II dimension functions are trivial extensions over Zq̂. Over Zp̂, more work is needed. First extend the ‘elementary’ dimension function from Zp̂Γp to Zp̂Γ, via a left Kan extension. We modify this complex to have the appropriate homology for the non- trivial q-subgroups using the same argument as proposition 6.8 in [9]: Use the following two exact sequences: 0→M → H0 → Ĥ0 → 0 0→ H2 → Ĥ2 →M → 0 where Hi is the original homology, Ĥi is the modified homology, and M is 51 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 the Zp̂Γ-module given by M(H) = Zp̂ if H < Cqs Zp̂p̄ if H = 1 0 otherwise We need only verify that M is projective. Indeed, M is a summand of the free module Zp̂Mor(−, G/Cqs). Remark 4.5.1. This argument also shows that the resulting complex will be free: since two copies of M are added in dimensions of opposite parity, the modified complex still has trivial obstruction. This shows that all dimension functions over RpΓ are realizable on finite dimensional complexes of f.g. free modules. For q, we only have that every dimension function exists as a finite complex of projectives over RqΓ (just include them from RqΓq). Lemma 4.3.9. In diagram 4.3.1, the finiteness obstruction vanishes on the image of g. Proof. We show that if DimX(−) is a dimension function such that q di- vides DimX(G/e)−DimX(G/Cp), we can construct unreduced chain com- plexes C(l) over Zl̂ such that the unreduced finiteness obstruction, σ(C (l)) ∈ K0(Zl̂Γ) vanishes. Since σ(C)⊗ Zl̂ = σ(C(l)) we are done. Below, we present a pair of chain complexes over Zp̂Γ and Zq̂Γ that have dimension function (0, 2i, 2q). The dimension of the chain complex is given on the left hand side of the page, and the complexes are written over the orbits G/Cp G/e and G/Cq G/e, 52 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 respectively. Notice that these dimension functions, for 0 ≤ i ≤ q, together with the dimension functions induced from normal subgroups, generate all of the dimension functions that satisfy the above congruence. Furthermore, notice that these complexes are constructed in a manner that that ensures their finiteness obstruction vanishes. 53 4.5. Proofs of Lemmas 4.3.5 and 4.3.9 [2q] Zp̂[G/Cq] Zq̂[Cq] Zp̂n−1ω [G/Cq] Zq̂[Cq] ... ... Zp̂i+1ω [G/Cq] Zq̂[Cq] Zp̂[G/Cq]⊕ Zp̂i+1ω [G/Cq] Zq̂[Cq]⊕ Zq̂Q [2i] Zp̂ Zp̂[G/Cq]⊕ Zp̂ωi [G/Cq] Zq̂ 0 Zq̂[G/Cq] 0 0 ... 0 ... Zp̂ω2 [G/Cq] 0 Zp̂ω [G/Cq] 0 Zp̂ω [G/Cq] Zq̂Q [0] Zp̂ Zp̂[G/Cq] Zq̂ Zq̂[G/Cq] 54 Bibliography [1] Stefan Bauer. A linearity theorem for group actions on spheres with applications to homotopy representations. Comment. Math. Helv., 64(1):167–172, 1989. [2] Serge Bouc and Ergün Yalçın. Borel-Smith functions and the Dade group. J. Algebra, 311(2):821–839, 2007. [3] Albrecht Dold. Zur Homotopietheorie der Kettenkomplexe. Math. Ann., 140:278–298, 1960. [4] Ronald M. Dotzel and Gary C. Hamrick. p-group actions on homology spheres. Invent. Math., 62(3):437–442, 1981. [5] William G. Dwyer and Clarence W. Wilkerson. Smith theory revisited. Ann. of Math. (2), 127(1):191–198, 1988. [6] A.D. Elmendorf. Systems of fixed point sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 277:275–284, 1983. [7] J. Grodal and J. H. Smith. Classification of homotopy G-actions on spheres. In Preparation, 2009. [8] Jesper Grodal. The classification of p-compact groups and homotopical group theory. Proc. ICM, 2010. [9] Ian Hambleton, Serma Pamuk, and Ergun Yalcin. Equivariant cw- complexes and the orbit category. arXiv:0807.3357v3, 2008. [10] Stefan Jackowski, James McClure, and Bob Oliver. Homotopy clas- sification of self-maps of BG via G-actions. I. Ann. of Math. (2), 135(1):183–226, 1992. 55 Bibliography [11] Wolfgang Lück. Transformation groups and algebraic K-theory, volume 1408 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989. Mathematica Gottingensis. [12] Saunders Mac Lane. Categories for the working mathematician, vol- ume 5 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998. [13] John Milnor. Groups which act on Sn without fixed points. Amer. J. Math., 79:623–630, 1957. [14] Serma Pamuk. Periodic Resolutions and Finite Group Actions. PhD thesis, McMaster University, 2008. [15] P. A. Smith. Permutable periodic transformations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 30:105–108, 1944. [16] Richard G. Swan. Periodic resolutions for finite groups. Ann. of Math. (2), 72:267–291, 1960. [17] Jacques Thévenaz. G-algebras and modular representation theory. Ox- ford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press Oxford Univer- sity Press, New York, 1995. Oxford Science Publications. [18] T. tom Dieck and T. Petrie. The homotopy structure of finite group actions on spheres. In Algebraic topology, Waterloo, 1978 (Proc. Conf., Univ. Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont., 1978), volume 741 of Lecture Notes in Math., pages 222–243. Springer, Berlin, 1979. [19] Tammo tom Dieck and Ted Petrie. Homotopy representations of finite groups. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., (56):129–169 (1983), 1982. [20] C. T. C. Wall. Finiteness conditions for CW-complexes. Ann. of Math. (2), 81:56–69, 1965. 56
- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Group actions on finite homotopy spheres
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Featured Collection
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Group actions on finite homotopy spheres Clarkson, James Price 2010
pdf
Notice for Google Chrome users:
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.
If you are having trouble viewing or searching the PDF with Google Chrome, please download it here instead.
Page Metadata
Item Metadata
Title | Group actions on finite homotopy spheres |
Creator |
Clarkson, James Price |
Publisher | University of British Columbia |
Date Issued | 2010 |
Description | Recently, Grodal and Smith [7}have developed a finite algebraic model to study hG-spaces where G is a finite group. The procedure associates to each G-space X with finite F_p homology a perfect chain complex of functors over the orbit category. When X has the homotopy type of a sphere, this construction is particularly well behaved. The reverse construction, building an hG-space from the algebraic model, generally produces an infinite dimensional space. In this thesis, we construct a finiteness obstruction for hG-spheres working one prime at a time. We then begin the development of a global finiteness obstruction. When G is the metacyclic group of order pq, we are able to go further and express the global finiteness obstruction in terms of dimension functions. In addition, we relate the work of tom Dieck and Petrie [19] concerning homotopy representations to the newer model of Grodal and Smith, and compute the rank of V_w(G). We conclude with some new examples of finite Σ₃-spheres. |
Genre |
Thesis/Dissertation |
Type |
Text |
Language | eng |
Date Available | 2010-08-06 |
Provider | Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library |
Rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International |
DOI | 10.14288/1.0071105 |
URI | http://hdl.handle.net/2429/27134 |
Degree |
Doctor of Philosophy - PhD |
Program |
Mathematics |
Affiliation |
Science, Faculty of Mathematics, Department of |
Degree Grantor | University of British Columbia |
GraduationDate | 2010-11 |
Campus |
UBCV |
Scholarly Level | Graduate |
Rights URI | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
AggregatedSourceRepository | DSpace |
Download
- Media
- 24-ubc_2010_fall_clarkson_james.pdf [ 320.71kB ]
- Metadata
- JSON: 24-1.0071105.json
- JSON-LD: 24-1.0071105-ld.json
- RDF/XML (Pretty): 24-1.0071105-rdf.xml
- RDF/JSON: 24-1.0071105-rdf.json
- Turtle: 24-1.0071105-turtle.txt
- N-Triples: 24-1.0071105-rdf-ntriples.txt
- Original Record: 24-1.0071105-source.json
- Full Text
- 24-1.0071105-fulltext.txt
- Citation
- 24-1.0071105.ris
Full Text
Cite
Citation Scheme:
Usage Statistics
Share
Embed
Customize your widget with the following options, then copy and paste the code below into the HTML
of your page to embed this item in your website.
<div id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidgetDisplay">
<script id="ubcOpenCollectionsWidget"
src="{[{embed.src}]}"
data-item="{[{embed.item}]}"
data-collection="{[{embed.collection}]}"
data-metadata="{[{embed.showMetadata}]}"
data-width="{[{embed.width}]}"
data-media="{[{embed.selectedMedia}]}"
async >
</script>
</div>
Our image viewer uses the IIIF 2.0 standard.
To load this item in other compatible viewers, use this url:
https://iiif.library.ubc.ca/presentation/dsp.24.1-0071105/manifest