- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Undergraduate Research /
- Titanoboa : a cost benefit analysis of the eatART Foundation’s...
Open Collections
UBC Undergraduate Research
Titanoboa : a cost benefit analysis of the eatART Foundation’s environmental education & public outreach activities Jhutti, Romy-Rajvir
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to offer greater insights in to the link between art, environmental education, and behaviour change through investigating the role of art in the fight against anthropogenic climate change. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of art as a tool for spreading socio-environmental education, and cognitive learning with the viewer, encouraging pro-environmental individual behaviour change. Specifically, my research is centered on an environmental cost benefit analysis (CBA), in the investigation of the eatART Foundation’s performance sculpture Titanoboa, and the impact of its art-based environmental educational outreach activities at the 2013 Vancouver Chinese New Year Parade. This research will answer the following questions put forward by the eatART Foundation: 1. What message is the viewer taking away from our outreach efforts? 2. How can we share the environmental message of our work to encourage the greatest impact on the viewer as well as the environment? 3. How can we minimize the impact of our personal energy consumption patterns while sustaining the greatest impact on our audience members? In the interest of spreading their mandate of “energy awareness through art”, eatART must travel to distant outreach locations by motor vehicle, generating a harmful carbon footprint in the process. This is an environmental cost, which contradicts eatART’s environmental mandate and ultimately contributes to the phenomena of global warming and climate change. To conclusively determine whether the environmental benefits of eatART’s educational outreach offset this carbon footprint, this study employs a three part qualitative and quantitative method, which quantifies and compares the carbon footprint in relation to the cognitive level of learning as well as its relative impact amongst outreach participants. The environmental costs of this case study are quantified based on eatART’s carbon footprint owing to transportation, and are focused on understanding Titanoboa’s overall impact on climate change. Titanoboa’s carbon footprint is calculated strictly based on the CO₂ emissions generated from the modes of transportation used by eatART in travelling to the 2013 Vancouver Chinese New Year parade. Overall, results indicate that eatART generated very miniscule environmental costs, with a very small carbon footprint of approximately 10.87 kilograms of CO₂. Although eatART normally relies solely on the use of fuel-based motor vehicles for transportation, in this case study eatART utilized several low-emission modes of transportation. These environmentally friendly modes of transportation partially account for the small carbon footprint. However, the small carbon footprint primarily occurred due to the fact that eatART travelled a very short local distance within Vancouver of merely 86.4 kilometers and consequently emitted very low amounts of CO₂. While the environmental costs in this case study were low, Rathore’s research demonstrates that eatART could potentially generate a very high environmental cost through extensive long distance travel relying on motor vehicle use. In order to maintain a low carbon footprint in future outreach, eatART should focus on reducing their CO₂ emissions by travelling less. I recommend restricting all future environmental outreach activities to destinations within a small local area that require only short distances of travel. I would only recommend travelling to distant outreach locations in situations where the environmental benefits are known to outweigh the environmental costs 4 associated with travel. EatArt should also increase the use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation in the future, as the findings demonstrate that these modes can be successfully employed to lower CO₂ emissions while maintaining the quality and scale of educational outreach. Alternatively, eatART could also explore the possibility of creating lightweight art pieces instead of large heavy performance art sculptures, as they require less fuel to transport. Likewise, eatART could also consider the possibility of creating fixed art installations that do not require any travel for environmental outreach purposes. Lastly, eatART could also explore the option of purchasing carbon offsets, which indirectly reduce the overall negative impact of eatART’s activities on the environment. The environmental benefits of this study are based on measuring the overall success of Titanoboa’s environmental outreach programming in facilitating cognitive understanding of environmental awareness with the viewer, as well as individual behaviour change. To quantify the environmental benefits of educational outreach programming, this research employs a two-part investigation utilizing a research survey and interviews. The research findings of the survey, suggest that there are a low amount of environmental benefits offered by Titanoboa’s current outreach efforts. Generally, the results demonstrate that the perceived message behind outreach programming did not spread a message of environmental awareness, but instead encouraged a message of innovative artwork and technology. Correspondingly, participants indicated that they were highly unlikely to adopt any pro-environmental behaviour changes as a result of outreach efforts. The research findings from the interviews also support the findings of the research survey, confirming that very low amounts of environmental benefits are offered by Titanoboa’s current educational outreach. To reap the environmental benefits of art-based environmental outreach in the future, eatART must reassess the framework of Titanoboa’s educational outreach programming. In order to spread the message of energy awareness and encourage behaviour change with participants in the future, my recommendation for eatART is to redesign their educational outreach programming so that it communicates a very clear environmental educational message and utilizes effective strategies to communicate this message with their audience. Educational programming must be redesigned to communicate a central message of environmental awareness with the viewer instead of innovative art and technology. I also recommend increasing public interaction and involvement with the viewer in future outreach endeavors, as research demonstrates that increased public interaction and involvement is especially fundamental when attempting to foster environmental awareness, and a personal connection facilitating behaviour change. While inspiring behavioural change with the viewer, can be challenging, research demonstrates that the use of non-conventional strategies in outreach such as social marketing, critical place-based education and eco-visualization can be highly influential in spreading climate change awareness as well as influencing individual behaviour change. As such, my recommendation for eatART is to also incorporate the use of these strategies in their future outreach programming. Once the changes to outreach programming are implemented, my recommendation to eatART is to continue to use environmental CBA to measure the overall impact of their educational outreach programming, to monitor whether the benefits of outreach offset the costs.
Item Metadata
Title |
Titanoboa : a cost benefit analysis of the eatART Foundation’s environmental education & public outreach activities
|
Creator | |
Date Issued |
2013-04
|
Description |
The purpose of this research is to offer greater insights in to the link between art,
environmental education, and behaviour change through investigating the role of art in
the fight against anthropogenic climate change. This study aims to examine the
effectiveness of art as a tool for spreading socio-environmental education, and cognitive
learning with the viewer, encouraging pro-environmental individual behaviour change.
Specifically, my research is centered on an environmental cost benefit analysis (CBA), in
the investigation of the eatART Foundation’s performance sculpture Titanoboa, and the
impact of its art-based environmental educational outreach activities at the 2013
Vancouver Chinese New Year Parade. This research will answer the following questions
put forward by the eatART Foundation:
1. What message is the viewer taking away from our outreach efforts?
2. How can we share the environmental message of our work to encourage the
greatest impact on the viewer as well as the environment?
3. How can we minimize the impact of our personal energy consumption patterns
while sustaining the greatest impact on our audience members?
In the interest of spreading their mandate of “energy awareness through art”,
eatART must travel to distant outreach locations by motor vehicle, generating a harmful
carbon footprint in the process. This is an environmental cost, which contradicts
eatART’s environmental mandate and ultimately contributes to the phenomena of global
warming and climate change. To conclusively determine whether the environmental
benefits of eatART’s educational outreach offset this carbon footprint, this study employs
a three part qualitative and quantitative method, which quantifies and compares the carbon footprint in relation to the cognitive level of learning as well as its relative impact
amongst outreach participants.
The environmental costs of this case study are quantified based on eatART’s
carbon footprint owing to transportation, and are focused on understanding Titanoboa’s
overall impact on climate change. Titanoboa’s carbon footprint is calculated strictly
based on the CO₂ emissions generated from the modes of transportation used by eatART
in travelling to the 2013 Vancouver Chinese New Year parade. Overall, results indicate
that eatART generated very miniscule environmental costs, with a very small carbon
footprint of approximately 10.87 kilograms of CO₂. Although eatART normally relies
solely on the use of fuel-based motor vehicles for transportation, in this case study
eatART utilized several low-emission modes of transportation. These environmentally
friendly modes of transportation partially account for the small carbon footprint.
However, the small carbon footprint primarily occurred due to the fact that eatART
travelled a very short local distance within Vancouver of merely 86.4 kilometers and
consequently emitted very low amounts of CO₂.
While the environmental costs in this case study were low, Rathore’s research
demonstrates that eatART could potentially generate a very high environmental cost
through extensive long distance travel relying on motor vehicle use. In order to maintain
a low carbon footprint in future outreach, eatART should focus on reducing their CO₂
emissions by travelling less. I recommend restricting all future environmental outreach
activities to destinations within a small local area that require only short distances of
travel. I would only recommend travelling to distant outreach locations in situations
where the environmental benefits are known to outweigh the environmental costs 4
associated with travel. EatArt should also increase the use of environmentally friendly
modes of transportation in the future, as the findings demonstrate that these modes can be
successfully employed to lower CO₂ emissions while maintaining the quality and scale of
educational outreach. Alternatively, eatART could also explore the possibility of creating
lightweight art pieces instead of large heavy performance art sculptures, as they require
less fuel to transport. Likewise, eatART could also consider the possibility of creating
fixed art installations that do not require any travel for environmental outreach purposes.
Lastly, eatART could also explore the option of purchasing carbon offsets, which
indirectly reduce the overall negative impact of eatART’s activities on the environment.
The environmental benefits of this study are based on measuring the overall
success of Titanoboa’s environmental outreach programming in facilitating cognitive
understanding of environmental awareness with the viewer, as well as individual
behaviour change. To quantify the environmental benefits of educational outreach
programming, this research employs a two-part investigation utilizing a research survey
and interviews. The research findings of the survey, suggest that there are a low amount
of environmental benefits offered by Titanoboa’s current outreach efforts. Generally, the
results demonstrate that the perceived message behind outreach programming did not
spread a message of environmental awareness, but instead encouraged a message of
innovative artwork and technology. Correspondingly, participants indicated that they
were highly unlikely to adopt any pro-environmental behaviour changes as a result of
outreach efforts. The research findings from the interviews also support the findings of
the research survey, confirming that very low amounts of environmental benefits are
offered by Titanoboa’s current educational outreach. To reap the environmental benefits of art-based environmental outreach in the
future, eatART must reassess the framework of Titanoboa’s educational outreach
programming. In order to spread the message of energy awareness and encourage
behaviour change with participants in the future, my recommendation for eatART is to
redesign their educational outreach programming so that it communicates a very clear
environmental educational message and utilizes effective strategies to communicate this
message with their audience. Educational programming must be redesigned to
communicate a central message of environmental awareness with the viewer instead of
innovative art and technology. I also recommend increasing public interaction and
involvement with the viewer in future outreach endeavors, as research demonstrates that
increased public interaction and involvement is especially fundamental when attempting
to foster environmental awareness, and a personal connection facilitating behaviour
change. While inspiring behavioural change with the viewer, can be challenging, research
demonstrates that the use of non-conventional strategies in outreach such as social
marketing, critical place-based education and eco-visualization can be highly influential
in spreading climate change awareness as well as influencing individual behaviour
change. As such, my recommendation for eatART is to also incorporate the use of these
strategies in their future outreach programming. Once the changes to outreach
programming are implemented, my recommendation to eatART is to continue to use
environmental CBA to measure the overall impact of their educational outreach
programming, to monitor whether the benefits of outreach offset the costs.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Series | |
Date Available |
2014-04-23
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0075669
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Campus | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Undergraduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada