- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Milton "Lycidas" : an evaluation of eight approaches...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Milton "Lycidas" : an evaluation of eight approaches and the proposal of a ninth approach Winter, Keith J.
Abstract
The history of the literary criticism of "Lycidas" contains wide-spread disagreement and is punctuated with numerous altercations. The reputation of the poem has been built largely on the denial of the denials of its sincerity and unity. The point upon which most critics do agree is that "Lycidas" is undoubtedly one of the most problematic poems in the history of English literature. This power of "Lycidas" to intrigue the critics and to incite disagreement is best seen, I feel, in the longstanding controversy over whether the poem contains a unifying principle and , if so, what is it. After reading through about two hundred articles on "Lycidas", I noticed that there were eight broad approaches to the poem. These are: imagistic, archetypal, technical, biographical, literal, mannerist, musical, and irrelevance of intention. This thesis is an attempt to evaluate the unifying principle implicit or explicit in each of these eight approaches. The aim of this thesis is not to explicate the entire poem, but to find a satisfactory unifying principle. For each of the eight approaches I have selected the one critic, or at most three, who best typifies this approach. In the course of the discussion eight major fallcies will be offered as grounds for delimiting the eight unifying principles. There are: the faulty syllogism, the literal fallacy, the biographical fallacy, the fallacy of mistaking the author's intentions, the formal fallacy, the selective fallacy, the psychological fallacy, and the reductionsist fallacy. I do not wish to imply a one to one correspondence between the eight approaches and the eight fallacies; some approaches contain only one fallacy, whereas other contain several. After evaluating the eight broad approaches to "Lycidas", this thesis will advance the conclusion that the unity of the poem is larger, more organic, more synthetic than that suggested by any of the eight approaches. The central unity of the poem is a buttressing principle in which the metaphorical, thematic, literal, biographical, manneristic, archetypal, and technical features of the poem mutually reinforce one another and fuse together into a total aesthetic impact.
Item Metadata
Title |
Milton "Lycidas" : an evaluation of eight approaches and the proposal of a ninth approach
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1965
|
Description |
The history of the literary criticism of "Lycidas"
contains wide-spread disagreement and is punctuated with
numerous altercations. The reputation of the poem has
been built largely on the denial of the denials of its
sincerity and unity. The point upon which most critics
do agree is that "Lycidas" is undoubtedly one of the most
problematic poems in the history of English literature.
This power of "Lycidas" to intrigue the critics and to
incite disagreement is best seen, I feel, in the longstanding
controversy over whether the poem contains a
unifying principle and , if so, what is it.
After reading through about two hundred articles
on "Lycidas", I noticed that there were eight broad
approaches to the poem. These are: imagistic, archetypal,
technical, biographical, literal, mannerist,
musical, and irrelevance of intention. This thesis
is an attempt to evaluate the unifying principle
implicit or explicit in each of these eight approaches.
The aim of this thesis is not to explicate the entire
poem, but to find a satisfactory unifying principle.
For each of the eight approaches I have selected the
one critic, or at most three, who best typifies this
approach.
In the course of the discussion eight major fallcies
will be offered as grounds for delimiting the eight unifying
principles. There are: the faulty syllogism, the literal
fallacy, the biographical fallacy, the fallacy of mistaking
the author's intentions, the formal fallacy, the selective
fallacy, the psychological fallacy, and the reductionsist
fallacy. I do not wish to imply a one to one correspondence
between the eight approaches and the eight fallacies; some
approaches contain only one fallacy, whereas other contain
several.
After evaluating the eight broad approaches to
"Lycidas", this thesis will advance the conclusion that
the unity of the poem is larger, more organic, more synthetic
than that suggested by any of the eight approaches.
The central unity of the poem is a buttressing principle
in which the metaphorical, thematic, literal, biographical,
manneristic, archetypal, and technical features of the
poem mutually reinforce one another and fuse together
into a total aesthetic impact.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2012-05-28
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0107143
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.