- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Development and testing of a paired-comparisons figural...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Development and testing of a paired-comparisons figural scale to measure preference for complexity Wichert, Shelley Gabriele
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop and to test a paired-comparisons figural scale to measure preference for complexity. A Random Shapes Scale (RSS) consisting of 18 sets of 3 random shapes was constructed. In each set of 3, one shape was of high complexity, one of medium complexity and one of low complexity. The random shapes were chosen from the eleven hundred generated by Vanderplas. Two existing measures of preference for complexity, the Barron-Welsh Art Scale (BW) and the Revised Art Scale (RA) were also used. Students in architecture, art, education, law and engineering (N=292) were tested using the RSS. Three weeks later the same groups of students (N=184) were retested on the RSS and completed the BW and RA as well. The BW and RA were significantly correlated with the RSS in three of the five groups tested. The internal consistency of the RSS calculated over all groups combined was .66; the stability coefficient was .71. The analysis of variance showed significant differences among the five groups tested. Therefore the RSS does differentiate among groups on the dimension of preference for complexity. The majority of the items were highly correlated with total test scores. This indicates that the items are homogenous. The results of the statistical analyses lead to the conclusion that the RSS is a useful measure of a unitary dimension of preference for complexity.
Item Metadata
Title |
Development and testing of a paired-comparisons figural scale to measure preference for complexity
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1973
|
Description |
The purpose of this study was to develop and to test a
paired-comparisons figural scale to measure preference for
complexity.
A Random Shapes Scale (RSS) consisting of 18 sets of
3 random shapes was constructed. In each set of 3, one
shape was of high complexity, one of medium complexity
and one of low complexity. The random shapes were chosen
from the eleven hundred generated by Vanderplas. Two existing
measures of preference for complexity, the Barron-Welsh Art
Scale (BW) and the Revised Art Scale (RA) were also used.
Students in architecture, art, education, law and
engineering (N=292) were tested using the RSS. Three weeks
later the same groups of students (N=184) were retested on
the RSS and completed the BW and RA as well. The BW and RA
were significantly correlated with the RSS in three of the
five groups tested.
The internal consistency of the RSS calculated over all
groups combined was .66; the stability coefficient was .71.
The analysis of variance showed significant differences
among the five groups tested. Therefore the RSS does differentiate
among groups on the dimension of preference for complexity.
The majority of the items were highly correlated with total
test scores. This indicates that the items are homogenous.
The results of the statistical analyses lead to the
conclusion that the RSS is a useful measure of a unitary
dimension of preference for complexity.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2012-04-11
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0107079
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.