- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification in case-control studies Chu, Rong
Abstract
Measurement error occurs frequently in observational studies investigating the relationship between exposure variables and the clinical outcome. Error-prone observations on the explanatory variable may lead to biased estimation and loss of power in detecting the impact of an exposure variable. The mechanism of measurement error, such as whether or in what way the quality of data is affected by the disease status, is seldom completely revealed to the investigators. This increases uncertainty in assessing the consequences of ignoring measurement error associated with observed data, and brings difficulties to adjustment for mismeasurement. In this study, we consider situations with a correctly specified binary response, and a misclassified binary exposure. We propose a solution to conduct Bayesian adjustment to correct for measurement error subject to varying differentiality, including the nondifferential misclassification, differential misclassification and nearly nondifferential misclassification. Our Bayesian model incorporates the randomness of exposure prevalences and misclassification parameters as prior distributions. The posterior model is constructed upon simulations generated by Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Internal validation data is utilized to insure the resulting model is identifiable. Meanwhile, we compare the Bayesian model with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and simulation extrapolation (MC-SIMEX) methods, using simulated datasets. The Bayesian and MLE models produce accurate and similar estimates for odds ratio in describing the association between the disease and exposure, when appropriate assumptions regarding the differentially of misclassification are made. The 90% credible or confidence intervals capture the truth approximately 90% of the time. A Bayesian method corresponding to nearly nondifferential prior belief compromises between the loss of efficiency and loss of accuracy associated with other prior assumptions. At the end, we look at two case-control studies with misclassified exposure variables, and aim to make valid inference about the effect parameter.
Item Metadata
Title |
Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification in case-control studies
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2007
|
Description |
Measurement error occurs frequently in observational studies investigating the relationship
between exposure variables and the clinical outcome. Error-prone observations on
the explanatory variable may lead to biased estimation and loss of power in detecting the
impact of an exposure variable. The mechanism of measurement error, such as whether
or in what way the quality of data is affected by the disease status, is seldom completely
revealed to the investigators. This increases uncertainty in assessing the consequences
of ignoring measurement error associated with observed data, and brings difficulties to
adjustment for mismeasurement.
In this study, we consider situations with a correctly specified binary response, and
a misclassified binary exposure. We propose a solution to conduct Bayesian adjustment
to correct for measurement error subject to varying differentiality, including the
nondifferential misclassification, differential misclassification and nearly nondifferential
misclassification. Our Bayesian model incorporates the randomness of exposure prevalences
and misclassification parameters as prior distributions. The posterior model is
constructed upon simulations generated by Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithm.
Internal validation data is utilized to insure the resulting model is identifiable.
Meanwhile, we compare the Bayesian model with maximum likelihood estimation
(MLE) and simulation extrapolation (MC-SIMEX) methods, using simulated datasets.
The Bayesian and MLE models produce accurate and similar estimates for odds ratio
in describing the association between the disease and exposure, when appropriate assumptions regarding the differentially of misclassification are made. The 90% credible
or confidence intervals capture the truth approximately 90% of the time. A Bayesian
method corresponding to nearly nondifferential prior belief compromises between the
loss of efficiency and loss of accuracy associated with other prior assumptions. At the
end, we look at two case-control studies with misclassified exposure variables, and aim
to make valid inference about the effect parameter.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2011-03-07
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0101064
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.