- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Counterfactuals and cotenability
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Counterfactuals and cotenability Gleb, Gary Timothy
Abstract
If philosophers had an acceptable theory of counterfactuals, counterfactuals would be an extremely useful philosophical tool. Unfortunately, analysis of the truth-conditions of counterfactuals has proved to be a difficult task. I examine Nelson Goodman's attempt in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast to develop a criterion of truth for counterfactuals, an attempt which ended with the discovery of a notorious problem, that of cotenability. This problem arises directly out of Goodman's inclusion of what is known as the "cotenability condition" within his tentative criterion. I explore in some detail the evidence that Goodman adduces in favour of this condition, and in doing so, argue that the cotenability condition as it stands is viciously circular. However, I also argue that this evidence is best seen as giving rise to two distinct problems, of which the solution to neither requires use of the cotenability condition. Resolution of the first, I claim, ultimately depends on the notion of explanation. With respect to the second, on the other hand, I contend that if the approach I suggest is borne out, then no modification of Goodman's criterion is necessary, other than that required to resolve the first problem.
Item Metadata
Title |
Counterfactuals and cotenability
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1977
|
Description |
If philosophers had an acceptable theory of counterfactuals, counterfactuals would be an extremely useful philosophical tool. Unfortunately, analysis of the truth-conditions of counterfactuals has proved to be a difficult task. I examine Nelson Goodman's attempt in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast to develop a criterion of truth for counterfactuals, an attempt which ended with the discovery of a notorious problem, that of cotenability. This problem arises directly out of Goodman's inclusion of what is known as the "cotenability condition" within his tentative criterion. I explore
in some detail the evidence that Goodman adduces in favour of this
condition, and in doing so, argue that the cotenability condition as it stands is viciously circular. However, I also argue that this evidence is best seen as giving rise to two distinct problems, of which the solution to neither requires use of the cotenability condition. Resolution of the first, I claim, ultimately depends on the notion of explanation. With respect to the second, on the other hand, I contend that if the approach I suggest is borne out, then no modification of Goodman's criterion is necessary, other than that required to resolve the first problem.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2010-02-21
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0094184
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.