- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Environmental regulation and incentives to comply :...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Environmental regulation and incentives to comply : reviewing the economics behind forest practices enforcement strategies in British Columbia Farenholtz, Glenn Douglas
Abstract
Government, as the Principal in the Principal-Agent theory model, can maximize social welfare in setting up an enforcement structure that provides incentive for an Agent to adopt diligent behaviour. Also, society is better off providing opportunity for development and harvesting of resources on those lands where diligent behaviour will result in social welfare gains. Penalties provide incentive for firms to expend on precautionary strategies to lessen the social welfare loss of environmental damage and allow for the maximization of social welfare. Using a partial equilibrium model of social welfare from forest management activities, a definition of what penalties should be to provide optimal incentive is developed. Penalties levied under the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act have been described as low by the Forest Practices Board and by environmental groups due to not recognizing the value of environmental damage in the sanction. As penalties are negligence-based under the Code, they do not explicitly consider environmental damage as is shown in the derivations from the partial equilibrium model. The model describes that penalties should be greater than the difference in the cost of being diligent relative to the increased likelihood of environmental damage from non-diligent behaviour. The relative effects of that ratio are subject to social value constraints, and some consideration as to proportionality of this relationship has bearing on whether the "penalty fits the crime". Government may elect to pursue other non-financial strategies to effect compliance, as the cost of pursuing an enforcement action exceeds the expected social gains of enforcement, and therefore would be a welfare loss with a low probability of successful sanction. Economic incentive to comply is more sensitive to the probability of a penalty being applied than the size of the penalty and therefore actions that increase the successful application of a sanction, for example making regulations and standards clearer and more enforceable, will assist in providing for increased incentive to comply.
Item Metadata
Title |
Environmental regulation and incentives to comply : reviewing the economics behind forest practices enforcement strategies in British Columbia
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2003
|
Description |
Government, as the Principal in the Principal-Agent theory model, can maximize social
welfare in setting up an enforcement structure that provides incentive for an Agent to adopt
diligent behaviour. Also, society is better off providing opportunity for development and
harvesting of resources on those lands where diligent behaviour will result in social welfare
gains. Penalties provide incentive for firms to expend on precautionary strategies to lessen
the social welfare loss of environmental damage and allow for the maximization of social
welfare.
Using a partial equilibrium model of social welfare from forest management activities, a
definition of what penalties should be to provide optimal incentive is developed. Penalties
levied under the Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act have been described as low
by the Forest Practices Board and by environmental groups due to not recognizing the value
of environmental damage in the sanction. As penalties are negligence-based under the
Code, they do not explicitly consider environmental damage as is shown in the derivations
from the partial equilibrium model. The model describes that penalties should be greater
than the difference in the cost of being diligent relative to the increased likelihood of
environmental damage from non-diligent behaviour. The relative effects of that ratio are
subject to social value constraints, and some consideration as to proportionality of this
relationship has bearing on whether the "penalty fits the crime".
Government may elect to pursue other non-financial strategies to effect compliance, as the
cost of pursuing an enforcement action exceeds the expected social gains of enforcement,
and therefore would be a welfare loss with a low probability of successful sanction.
Economic incentive to comply is more sensitive to the probability of a penalty being applied
than the size of the penalty and therefore actions that increase the successful application of
a sanction, for example making regulations and standards clearer and more enforceable,
will assist in providing for increased incentive to comply.
|
Extent |
7065122 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-11-17
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0091558
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2003-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.