- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Assessing the motivations and implications of US biological...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Assessing the motivations and implications of US biological warfare policy Warrian, Kevin James
Abstract
The 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) was the first international treaty in the history of arms control to successfully ban an entire class of strategic military weapons. Despite its historical precedent however, subsequent grievous violations of the convention by at least two state parties to the treaty revealed its profound weaknesses. In the absence of even the most rudimentary verification mechanisms, the diffusion and advancement of biotechnology resulted in severe violations by both the former Soviet Union and the former government of Iraq. In response to the violations of the international regime banning biological warfare, the state parties to the BTWC began to take steps to repair the regime in the early 1990s by initiating negotiations to create a set of multilateral verification protocols for the convention. In 2001, after have spent seven long years in negotiation, the positions of the state parties to the BTWC had begun to converge on a set of verification instruments that satisfied the vast majority of the participating nations. This progress however, was abruptly undercut by the United States when it not only rejected the draft verification protocols that had been negotiated by the state parties to the convention, but it also went on to reject the very process of strengthening the regime through the creation of multilateral verification mechanisms. To date, the U.S. policy toward the development of verification protocols has effectively prevented the international community from moving forward to strengthen the BTWC, as the U.S. is the world leader in biotechnology and any effective verification protocols would need the support of the United States. While the current U.S. policy toward verification protocols represents a formidable setback in the international community's effort to restore credibility to the BTWC, current illicit research and development by the U.S. military into the creation a new generation of offensive biological weapons has dealt yet another blow to the long standing international norm against biological warfare. In order to restore credibility to the international regime banning biological warfare, the U.S. must not only retreat from its polarized position of opposing the institution of multilateral verification protocols, but it must also bring itself back into full compliance with its obligations under the BTWC.
Item Metadata
Title |
Assessing the motivations and implications of US biological warfare policy
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2003
|
Description |
The 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) was the first
international treaty in the history of arms control to successfully ban an entire class of strategic
military weapons. Despite its historical precedent however, subsequent grievous violations of
the convention by at least two state parties to the treaty revealed its profound weaknesses. In
the absence of even the most rudimentary verification mechanisms, the diffusion and
advancement of biotechnology resulted in severe violations by both the former Soviet Union
and the former government of Iraq. In response to the violations of the international regime
banning biological warfare, the state parties to the BTWC began to take steps to repair the
regime in the early 1990s by initiating negotiations to create a set of multilateral verification
protocols for the convention. In 2001, after have spent seven long years in negotiation, the
positions of the state parties to the BTWC had begun to converge on a set of verification
instruments that satisfied the vast majority of the participating nations. This progress however,
was abruptly undercut by the United States when it not only rejected the draft verification
protocols that had been negotiated by the state parties to the convention, but it also went on to
reject the very process of strengthening the regime through the creation of multilateral
verification mechanisms. To date, the U.S. policy toward the development of verification
protocols has effectively prevented the international community from moving forward to
strengthen the BTWC, as the U.S. is the world leader in biotechnology and any effective
verification protocols would need the support of the United States. While the current U.S.
policy toward verification protocols represents a formidable setback in the international
community's effort to restore credibility to the BTWC, current illicit research and development
by the U.S. military into the creation a new generation of offensive biological weapons has
dealt yet another blow to the long standing international norm against biological warfare. In order to restore credibility to the international regime banning biological warfare, the U.S.
must not only retreat from its polarized position of opposing the institution of multilateral
verification protocols, but it must also bring itself back into full compliance with its
obligations under the BTWC.
|
Extent |
9201648 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-10-29
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0091032
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2003-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.