- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Numerical expressions in the oracle-bone and bronze...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Numerical expressions in the oracle-bone and bronze inscriptions : quantificational typology and the origin of the Chinese classifier system Campbell, Roderick Bruce
Abstract
This thesis will attempt to give a syntactic, semantic and pragmatic account of numerical expressions in the earliest attested stages of the Chinese language, the oracle-bone and bronze inscriptions. Early Inscriptional Chinese (EIC) numerical expressions can be classified into three different word orders: order I: Num N, order II: N Num and order III: N Num N. While order I is unmarked, orders II and III are marked, focus related structures. Specifically, when kind and number are being proposed or focused separately it causes the determiner phrase (DP) to be split in two, one part denoting kind and the second denoting number. Syntactically, the second DP is an adjunct of the first DP and co-referential to it, and together, they form a DP apposition structure. Based on the fact that order III is also the unmarked structure for measure phrases, it is proposed that the second noun in this construction is a classifier. In support, we presented a cross-linguistic study of classifiers based on recent work on the semantics of plurality and mass. From this investigation we proposed a distinction between languages that take the singular as default ("bottom up" languages) and those that take transnumeral as default ("top down" languages). Within the "top down" languages there are those that perform the operation of transnumeral to singular with an affix, a clitic, a lexical item or nothing at all. EIC uses the default strategy of not marking number, but in focus related order HI marks it with a lexical item (a classifier). This distinguishes EIC from modern Chinese dialects which have obligatory number marking and always use classifiers. Finally, we propose that this marked focus structure gradually lost its marked status and spread to non-focus contexts.
Item Metadata
Title |
Numerical expressions in the oracle-bone and bronze inscriptions : quantificational typology and the origin of the Chinese classifier system
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2001
|
Description |
This thesis will attempt to give a syntactic, semantic and pragmatic account of
numerical expressions in the earliest attested stages of the Chinese language, the
oracle-bone and bronze inscriptions. Early Inscriptional Chinese (EIC) numerical
expressions can be classified into three different word orders: order I: Num N, order II:
N Num and order III: N Num N. While order I is unmarked, orders II and III are
marked, focus related structures. Specifically, when kind and number are being
proposed or focused separately it causes the determiner phrase (DP) to be split in two,
one part denoting kind and the second denoting number. Syntactically, the second DP
is an adjunct of the first DP and co-referential to it, and together, they form a DP
apposition structure.
Based on the fact that order III is also the unmarked structure for measure
phrases, it is proposed that the second noun in this construction is a classifier. In
support, we presented a cross-linguistic study of classifiers based on recent work on
the semantics of plurality and mass. From this investigation we proposed a distinction
between languages that take the singular as default ("bottom up" languages) and those
that take transnumeral as default ("top down" languages). Within the "top down"
languages there are those that perform the operation of transnumeral to singular with
an affix, a clitic, a lexical item or nothing at all. EIC uses the default strategy of not
marking number, but in focus related order HI marks it with a lexical item (a
classifier). This distinguishes EIC from modern Chinese dialects which have
obligatory number marking and always use classifiers. Finally, we propose that this
marked focus structure gradually lost its marked status and spread to non-focus
contexts.
|
Extent |
8490273 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-08-06
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0090015
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2001-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.