- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm comparisons
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm comparisons Wen, Sijin
Abstract
Various Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms are available for sampling from a posterior distribution. The random walk Metropolis algorithm is a simple scheme which is frequently used in Bayesian statistical problem. The guided walk algorithm attempts to suppress the random walk behavior in the random walk Metropolis algorithm. Other algorithms, such as the Langevin algorithm and the hybrid algorithm use more information about the posterior distribution than the random walk Metropolis algorithm and the guided walk algorithm. In this thesis, The performance of each of those four algorithms has been examined, based on simulation studies using multivariate normal target distributions. Then we compare the algorithms in terms of efficiency and convergence time. Moreover, these four algorithms are compared using a posterior distribution for parameters given observed data in an application.
Item Metadata
Title |
Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm comparisons
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2001
|
Description |
Various Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms are available for sampling
from a posterior distribution. The random walk Metropolis algorithm is a
simple scheme which is frequently used in Bayesian statistical problem. The
guided walk algorithm attempts to suppress the random walk behavior in the
random walk Metropolis algorithm. Other algorithms, such as the Langevin
algorithm and the hybrid algorithm use more information about the posterior
distribution than the random walk Metropolis algorithm and the guided walk
algorithm. In this thesis, The performance of each of those four algorithms
has been examined, based on simulation studies using multivariate normal
target distributions. Then we compare the algorithms in terms of efficiency
and convergence time. Moreover, these four algorithms are compared using a
posterior distribution for parameters given observed data in an application.
|
Extent |
3175564 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-08-04
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0089938
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2001-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.