- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Welfare reform in Alberta and British Columbia : a...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Welfare reform in Alberta and British Columbia : a comparative case study Nash, Adrienne J.
Abstract
This thesis is a comparative case study of welfare reform in Alberta and British Columbia in the 1990s. It explores the predominant pressures on the social assistance systems emanating from the provincial, national and international arenas. It further identifies and compares the policy response of each province to these pressures and the consequences of the reforms for the respective governments and social assistance communities. Lastly, it attempts to account for the major similarities and differences between the two reformed welfare policies. This thesis argues that while Alberta's and British Columbia's welfare reforms share a number of notable similarities, they reflect fundamentally different models of welfare provision: Alberta's reforms follow a market-enforcement model while British Columbia's approximate a market-performance model. The similarities between the two policies are best accounted for as reactions to parallel pressures on the two welfare programs, specifically, rising welfare caseloads and program costs as well as the changing debate around the merits of government social assistance programs. Conversely, the differences between the two policies reflect the salience of distinctive pressures on each welfare system. In Alberta reform was driven by the influence of Alberta Family and Social Services Minister Mike Cardinal and the example of American welfare reforms while in BC the reforms were initiated on account of federal policy transformations and public perceptions of fraud. Finally, this thesis suggests that the specific models of welfare provision chosen in each case reflect the influence of each provinces' unique political context. The political ideology of the governing party in both provinces was a significant factor in determining the orientation of the reformed welfare policy. In Alberta the adoption of a market-enforcement model was further facilitated by the province's longstanding political culture while in British Columbia the influence of interest groups contributed to the creation of a social assistance policy closely resembling a market-performance model.
Item Metadata
Title |
Welfare reform in Alberta and British Columbia : a comparative case study
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1999
|
Description |
This thesis is a comparative case study of welfare reform in Alberta and British
Columbia in the 1990s. It explores the predominant pressures on the social assistance
systems emanating from the provincial, national and international arenas. It further
identifies and compares the policy response of each province to these pressures and the
consequences of the reforms for the respective governments and social assistance
communities. Lastly, it attempts to account for the major similarities and differences
between the two reformed welfare policies.
This thesis argues that while Alberta's and British Columbia's welfare reforms
share a number of notable similarities, they reflect fundamentally different models of
welfare provision: Alberta's reforms follow a market-enforcement model while British
Columbia's approximate a market-performance model. The similarities between the two
policies are best accounted for as reactions to parallel pressures on the two welfare
programs, specifically, rising welfare caseloads and program costs as well as the
changing debate around the merits of government social assistance programs.
Conversely, the differences between the two policies reflect the salience of distinctive
pressures on each welfare system. In Alberta reform was driven by the influence of
Alberta Family and Social Services Minister Mike Cardinal and the example of American
welfare reforms while in BC the reforms were initiated on account of federal policy
transformations and public perceptions of fraud.
Finally, this thesis suggests that the specific models of welfare provision chosen
in each case reflect the influence of each provinces' unique political context. The
political ideology of the governing party in both provinces was a significant factor in
determining the orientation of the reformed welfare policy. In Alberta the adoption of a
market-enforcement model was further facilitated by the province's longstanding
political culture while in British Columbia the influence of interest groups contributed to
the creation of a social assistance policy closely resembling a market-performance model.
|
Extent |
7151434 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-06-26
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0089185
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1999-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.