- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Masking of beluga whale (delphinapterus leucas) vocalizations...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Masking of beluga whale (delphinapterus leucas) vocalizations by icebreaker noise Erbe, Christine
Abstract
This thesis examines the masking effect of underwater noise on beluga whale communication. As ocean water is greatly opaque for light but well conducting for sound, marine mammals rely primarily on their hearing for orientation and communication. Man-made underwater noise has the potential of interfering with sounds used by marine mammals. Masking to the point of incomprehensibility can have fatal results-for the individual, but ultimately for the entire species. As part of our understanding of whether marine mammals can cope with human impact on nature, this thesis is the first to study the interference of real ocean noises with complex animal vocalizations. At the Vancouver Aquarium, a beluga whale was trained for acoustic experiments, during which masked hearing thresholds were measured. Focus lay on noise created by icebreaking ships in the Arctic. As experiments with trained animals are time and cost expensive, various techniques were examined for their ability to model the whale's response. These were human hearing tests, visual spectrogram discrimination, matched filtering, spectrogram cross-correlation, critical band cross-correlation, adaptive filtering and various types of artificial neural networks. The most efficient method with respect to similarity to the whale's data and speed, was a backpropagation neural net. Masked hearing thresholds would be of little use if they could not be related to accessible quantities in the wild. An ocean sound propagation model was applied to determine critical distances between a noise source, a calling whale and a listening whale. Colour diagrams, called maskograms, were invented to illustrate zones of masking in the wild. Results are that bubbler system noise with a source level of 194 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m has a maximum radius of masking of 15 km in a 3-dimensional ocean. Propeller noise with a source level of 203 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m has a maximum radius of masking of 22 km. A naturally occurring icecracking event with a source level of 147 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m only masks if the listening whale is within 8 m of the event. Therefore, in the wild, propeller cavitation noise masks furthest, followed by bubbler system noise, then icecracking noise.
Item Metadata
Title |
Masking of beluga whale (delphinapterus leucas) vocalizations by icebreaker noise
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1997
|
Description |
This thesis examines the masking effect of underwater noise on beluga whale communication.
As ocean water is greatly opaque for light but well conducting for sound, marine
mammals rely primarily on their hearing for orientation and communication. Man-made
underwater noise has the potential of interfering with sounds used by marine mammals.
Masking to the point of incomprehensibility can have fatal results-for the individual,
but ultimately for the entire species. As part of our understanding of whether marine
mammals can cope with human impact on nature, this thesis is the first to study the
interference of real ocean noises with complex animal vocalizations.
At the Vancouver Aquarium, a beluga whale was trained for acoustic experiments,
during which masked hearing thresholds were measured. Focus lay on noise created by
icebreaking ships in the Arctic.
As experiments with trained animals are time and cost expensive, various techniques
were examined for their ability to model the whale's response. These were human hearing
tests, visual spectrogram discrimination, matched filtering, spectrogram cross-correlation,
critical band cross-correlation, adaptive filtering and various types of artificial neural
networks. The most efficient method with respect to similarity to the whale's data and
speed, was a backpropagation neural net.
Masked hearing thresholds would be of little use if they could not be related to accessible
quantities in the wild. An ocean sound propagation model was applied to determine
critical distances between a noise source, a calling whale and a listening whale. Colour
diagrams, called maskograms, were invented to illustrate zones of masking in the wild.
Results are that bubbler system noise with a source level of 194 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m has
a maximum radius of masking of 15 km in a 3-dimensional ocean. Propeller noise with a
source level of 203 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m has a maximum radius of masking of 22 km. A
naturally occurring icecracking event with a source level of 147 dB re 1 μPa at 1 m only
masks if the listening whale is within 8 m of the event. Therefore, in the wild, propeller
cavitation noise masks furthest, followed by bubbler system noise, then icecracking noise.
|
Extent |
18919158 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-05-29
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0088708
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1997-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.