- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Pruning management of Leucaena leucocephala alleycropped...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Pruning management of Leucaena leucocephala alleycropped with maize and cassava Welke, Sylvia Eliesabeth
Abstract
An experiment was carried out to determine suitable pruning intervals for Leucaena leucocephala in an alley cropping system with maize and cassava in Southwestern Nigeria. I considered light and soil moisture limitations to crops in the system, in addition to nutrient contributions by Leucaena prunings to both crops and the soil. Pruning labour was also taken into account to provide an economic perspective. Marked reductions in maize yield were recorded when hedgerow pruning was delayed beyond 10 weeks after crop planting while cassava economic yield was not affected. I observed a general trend of taller plants with thinner stems when Leucaena hedgerows were not pruned or pruned at intervals of 8 weeks or less. Plants adjacent to the hedgerows were usually shorter than those in the middle of the alleys. I attributed the yield declines and growth effects to light limitations rather than soil moisture depletion by the hedgerows, although the potential for the latter could exist in drought. While productivity was affected by light reductions, there was no clear indication that Leucaena prunings contributed to crop growth. Differences in leaf nutrient content were obvious between treatments where hedgerows were pruned at least once a season and where they were not. Maize nutrition was likely satisfied by inorganic fertilizer and initial application of Leucaena pruning, but the same could not be established for cassava where nutrient concentrations were low. I suggest that prunings applied at or just after planting could contribute to crop nutrition, while subsequent prunings are instrumental in maintaining soil fertility. When costs of different pruning intervals were calculated, it was clear that pruning at least once during the maize growing season was advantageous. I briefly discuss some possible economic advantages and disadvantages of pruning every 4 and 8 weeks, or mid-season and at harvest. Upon integrating the biophysical and economic data gathered in the study, it is clear that hedgerow pruning can be delayed up to 10 weeks after planting for maize. For cassava, further studies are necessary in order to recommend pruning intervals for a maize/cassava intercrop in an alley cropping system.
Item Metadata
Title |
Pruning management of Leucaena leucocephala alleycropped with maize and cassava
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1993
|
Description |
An experiment was carried out to determine suitable pruning intervals for Leucaena leucocephala in
an alley cropping system with maize and cassava in Southwestern Nigeria. I considered light and
soil moisture limitations to crops in the system, in addition to nutrient contributions by Leucaena
prunings to both crops and the soil. Pruning labour was also taken into account to provide an
economic perspective. Marked reductions in maize yield were recorded when hedgerow pruning was
delayed beyond 10 weeks after crop planting while cassava economic yield was not affected. I
observed a general trend of taller plants with thinner stems when Leucaena hedgerows were not
pruned or pruned at intervals of 8 weeks or less. Plants adjacent to the hedgerows were usually
shorter than those in the middle of the alleys. I attributed the yield declines and growth effects to
light limitations rather than soil moisture depletion by the hedgerows, although the potential for the
latter could exist in drought. While productivity was affected by light reductions, there was no clear
indication that Leucaena prunings contributed to crop growth. Differences in leaf nutrient content
were obvious between treatments where hedgerows were pruned at least once a season and where
they were not. Maize nutrition was likely satisfied by inorganic fertilizer and initial application of
Leucaena pruning, but the same could not be established for cassava where nutrient concentrations
were low. I suggest that prunings applied at or just after planting could contribute to crop nutrition,
while subsequent prunings are instrumental in maintaining soil fertility. When costs of different
pruning intervals were calculated, it was clear that pruning at least once during the maize growing
season was advantageous. I briefly discuss some possible economic advantages and disadvantages of
pruning every 4 and 8 weeks, or mid-season and at harvest. Upon integrating the biophysical and
economic data gathered in the study, it is clear that hedgerow pruning can be delayed up to 10 weeks
after planting for maize. For cassava, further studies are necessary in order to recommend pruning
intervals for a maize/cassava intercrop in an alley cropping system.
|
Extent |
2120782 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-02-25
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0087369
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1994-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.