- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- A ghost in the machine : the struggle for epistemological...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
A ghost in the machine : the struggle for epistemological territory in chaos Coffey, E. Elaine
Abstract
This paper is a rhetorical examination of three works on the subject of chaos. The first two works discussed are the popular scientific texts "Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature", by Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, and "Chaos: Making a New Science", by James Gleick. These two works, which cover the emergence of a new science of nonlinear dynamics, are analysed using Lawrence Prelli's topological criteria for scientific reasonableness, as outlined in his book A Rhetoric of Science. The third work discussed is N. Katherine Hayles' book "Chaos Bound", which is an interdisciplinary study of chaos as a cultural entity that was transformed by and has transformed our systems of knowledge in postmodern society. This paper is a discussion of the distinctions that Hayles' has drawn between Prigogine and Stengers' text and Gleick's. Hayles maintains that Prigogine and Stengers' text and Gleick's represent two branches of chaos science. This paper challenges that assumption, and offers an alternative explanation for the differences between Gleick's book and Prigogine and Stengers' book based on a rhetorical analysis of those two texts. This paper then goes on to suggest a reason for Hayles' portrayal of a split in chaos science based on her reading of Prigogine and Stengers and Gleick. It is suggested that Hayles' cultural model (taken from both science and literature) for the transmission of knowledge leads her to posit a split in science that might positively reflect on her own interdisciplinary study. After an analysis of Hayles' cultural model (illustrating the dynamics of culture through the terms ecology, economy, and equivocation), a suggestion is made for an extension of her model that could resolve the paradox which has led her to portray two branches of chaos science.
Item Metadata
Title |
A ghost in the machine : the struggle for epistemological territory in chaos
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1995
|
Description |
This paper is a rhetorical examination of three works on the subject of chaos. The first two
works discussed are the popular scientific texts "Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature", by Ilya Prigogine and Isabelle Stengers, and "Chaos: Making a New Science", by James
Gleick. These two works, which cover the emergence of a new science of nonlinear dynamics, are analysed using Lawrence Prelli's topological criteria for scientific reasonableness, as outlined in his book A Rhetoric of Science. The third work discussed is N. Katherine Hayles' book "Chaos
Bound", which is an interdisciplinary study of chaos as a cultural entity that was transformed by and has transformed our systems of knowledge in postmodern society.
This paper is a discussion of the distinctions that Hayles' has drawn between Prigogine and
Stengers' text and Gleick's. Hayles maintains that Prigogine and Stengers' text and Gleick's
represent two branches of chaos science. This paper challenges that assumption, and offers an
alternative explanation for the differences between Gleick's book and Prigogine and Stengers'
book based on a rhetorical analysis of those two texts. This paper then goes on to suggest a
reason for Hayles' portrayal of a split in chaos science based on her reading of Prigogine and
Stengers and Gleick. It is suggested that Hayles' cultural model (taken from both science and
literature) for the transmission of knowledge leads her to posit a split in science that might
positively reflect on her own interdisciplinary study. After an analysis of Hayles' cultural model
(illustrating the dynamics of culture through the terms ecology, economy, and equivocation), a
suggestion is made for an extension of her model that could resolve the paradox which has led her to portray two branches of chaos science.
|
Extent |
4254753 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-02-03
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0086968
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1996-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.