- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Identification and treatment of depression in residents...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Identification and treatment of depression in residents of long term care facilities Soon, Judith Alice
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 1. To develop screening protocol for identifying long term care (LTC) residents with major depression suitable for participation in a clinical drug trial; 2. To conduct a pilot clinical trial of fluoxetine 5 mg and 20 mg daily and estimate the treatment success rate in elderly depressed LTC patients. DESIGN: All capable LTC residents were initially screened for depression. Subsequently, a pilot study for the clinical drug trial was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel, fixed-dose, dose-response trial with a one week placebo period, a 14 week treatment period, a 2 week drug-free period, and then an optional open-label continuation period. SETTING: Three medium-sized intermediate-care LTC facilities with medical services provided by primary care physicians, and a total study sample of 315 residents over 65 years of age. PATIENTS: The LTC study sample was 72 percent female and had a mean age of 84 (± 8) years. Following administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), 206 patients (65 %) were able to complete the screen, 155 (49 %) had a MMSE score > 19, 59 (19 %) had a G D S > 11, 21 (7 %) met the criteria for the clinical drug trial, and 17 (5 %) signed the informed consent to enter the trial. Of the patients who entered the trial, 15 were randomized into treatment groups, 8 completed the trial, and 6 met the criteria for treatment success. INTERVENTION: During the pilot study, patients received oral fluoxetine 5 mg or 20 mg daily. Maintenance therapy for concomitant medical conditions was continued. Benzodiazepines for hypnotic/sedative use were permitted and usage recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For those 155 patients with a MMSE >19, the distribution of GDS-30 scores suggested that 79 (51%) of patients were not depressed, and 76 (49 %) had a GDS score > 11 suggestive of depression. The correlation between the GDS-3 0 and HAM-D was 0.88 in patients with a MMSE > 19. Using the HAM-D criterion for major depression as the clinical standard, a GDS-30 cutoff score of 13 had a sensitivity of 100 %, and a specificity of 81 %. The mean time to administer the GDS-30 was 8.4 minutes (± 5.6); the HAM-D required 21.8 minutes ( ± 9.8). When screened, 44 patients (15% of the total LTC sample) were receiving antidepressants, and in the 30 of these patients with a MMSE > 19, 10 (33 % o f those on antidepressants) had a HAM-D > 18. When the results of all 8 patients who completed the pilot study were combined, the mean HAM-D score declined-from 20.6 (± 1.9) at the end of baseline to 8.1 (± 2.3) at the end of the study at Week 14. Six of the 8 patients who completed the trial met the criteria for treatment success. It was estimated that a total o f 126 patients would be required in a full clinical trial to detect a difference of 30 percent in treatment success with a power of 90 % and a level of significance of a = 0.05. Exploratory findings for the pooled patients who completed the trial found the following significant changes (p < 0.05) between the end of baseline and the end of study: GDS 17.8 ± 2.3 to 12.6 ± 4.0; CGI (severity) 4.4 ± 0.5 to 2.3 ± 0.7; and CGI (improvement) 4.1 ± 0.6 to 1.9 ±0.6. A substantial proportion of patients in both treatment groups had somatic symptoms present at baseline. Twenty-one treatment-emergent side effects were experienced by the 7 patients on 5 mg fluoxetine daily, while 24 treatment-emergent side effects were experienced by the 8 patients on 20 mg daily. Few treatment-emergent side effects occurred after 6 weeks of drug therapy. For the 8 patients who completed the trial, health status measures of 6 out of 8 health domains improved over the 14 week duration of the trial, with the magnitude of change in the range o f 20 to 75 %. CONCLUSIONS: Screening LTC residents with the GDS, MMSE, and then the HAM-D was an efficient and cost-effective method to identify potential candidates for a clinical drug trial in major depression. When data were combined for the groups treated with 5 mg and 20 mg fluoxetine daily for 14 weeks, 40 % of these elderly LTC patients experienced treatment success an d few late treatment-emergent side effects were observed.
Item Metadata
Title |
Identification and treatment of depression in residents of long term care facilities
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
OBJECTIVES: 1. To develop screening protocol for identifying long term care (LTC) residents with major depression suitable for participation in a clinical drug trial; 2. To conduct a pilot clinical trial of fluoxetine 5 mg and 20 mg daily and estimate the treatment success rate in elderly depressed LTC patients. DESIGN: All capable LTC residents were initially screened for depression. Subsequently, a pilot study for the clinical drug trial was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, parallel, fixed-dose, dose-response trial with a one week placebo period, a 14 week treatment period, a 2 week drug-free period, and then an optional open-label continuation period. SETTING: Three medium-sized intermediate-care LTC facilities with medical services provided by primary care physicians, and a total study sample of 315 residents over
65 years of age. PATIENTS: The LTC study sample was 72 percent female and had a mean age of 84 (± 8) years. Following administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), 206 patients (65 %) were able to complete the screen, 155 (49 %) had a MMSE score > 19, 59 (19 %) had a G D S > 11, 21 (7 %) met the criteria for the clinical drug trial, and 17 (5 %) signed the informed consent to enter the trial. Of the patients who entered the trial, 15 were randomized into treatment groups, 8 completed the trial, and 6 met the criteria for treatment success. INTERVENTION: During the pilot study, patients received oral fluoxetine 5 mg or 20 mg daily. Maintenance therapy for concomitant medical conditions was continued. Benzodiazepines for hypnotic/sedative use were permitted and usage recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For those 155 patients with a MMSE >19, the distribution of GDS-30 scores suggested that 79 (51%) of patients were not depressed, and 76 (49 %) had a GDS score > 11 suggestive of depression. The correlation between the GDS-3 0 and HAM-D was 0.88 in patients with a MMSE > 19. Using the HAM-D criterion for major depression as the clinical standard, a GDS-30 cutoff score of 13 had a sensitivity of 100 %, and a specificity of 81 %. The mean time to administer the GDS-30 was 8.4
minutes (± 5.6); the HAM-D required 21.8 minutes ( ± 9.8). When screened, 44
patients (15% of the total LTC sample) were receiving antidepressants, and in the 30 of these patients with a MMSE > 19, 10 (33 % o f those on antidepressants) had a HAM-D > 18. When the results of all 8 patients who completed the pilot study were combined, the mean HAM-D score declined-from 20.6 (± 1.9) at the end of baseline to 8.1 (± 2.3) at the end of the study at Week 14. Six of the 8 patients who completed the trial met the criteria for treatment success. It was estimated that a total o f 126 patients would be required in a full clinical trial to detect a difference of 30 percent in treatment success with a power of 90 % and a level of significance of a = 0.05. Exploratory findings for the pooled patients who completed the trial found the following significant changes (p < 0.05) between the end of baseline and the end of study: GDS 17.8 ± 2.3 to 12.6 ± 4.0; CGI (severity) 4.4 ± 0.5 to 2.3 ± 0.7; and CGI (improvement) 4.1 ± 0.6 to 1.9 ±0.6. A substantial proportion of patients in both treatment groups had somatic symptoms present at baseline. Twenty-one treatment-emergent side effects were experienced by the 7 patients on 5 mg fluoxetine daily, while 24 treatment-emergent side effects were experienced by the 8 patients on 20 mg daily. Few treatment-emergent side effects occurred after 6 weeks of drug therapy. For the 8 patients who completed the trial, health status measures of 6 out of 8 health domains improved over the 14 week duration of the trial, with the magnitude of change in the range o f 20 to 75 %. CONCLUSIONS: Screening LTC residents with the GDS, MMSE, and then the HAM-D was an efficient and cost-effective method to identify potential candidates for a clinical drug trial in major depression. When data were combined for the groups treated with 5 mg and 20 mg fluoxetine daily for 14 weeks, 40 % of these elderly LTC patients experienced treatment success an d few late treatment-emergent side effects
were observed.
|
Extent |
10036323 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-01-10
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0086801
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1995-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.