- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Seat structural design choices and the effect on occupant...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Seat structural design choices and the effect on occupant injury potential in rear end collisions Skipper, Christopher Scott
Abstract
The seat is the most important safety device available to vehicle occupants during rear end collisions, and thus proper design and structural integrity of the seat under expected impact loading is essential. The objective of the current research work is to increase the understanding of design requirements for seat performance in relation to injury producing collisions, and to examine how various seat design parameters affect both structural integrity and occupant protection. A numerical model-based finite element parametric sensitivity study (conducted in LS-Dyna) was employed with the goal of assessing the effect of seat structural properties on occupant kinematics and injury response. A 2002 Pontiac Grand Am seat was utilized to create the base geometry for the finite element seat model used in the study. The parametric study utilized a 50th percentile male dummy, applied the CMVSS 202 standard crash pulse to selected structural variations of this seat, and then utilized the neck injury criterion (NIC), neck displacement criterion (NDC) and relative neck accelerations to assess the likelihood of injury. Seatback and recliner angle, and the degree of seatback twist are utilized to indicate seat performance. Based upon this work, there are significant structural components of the seat that contribute to injury mitigation. The recliner rotational stiffness and the head restraint stiffness are the most significant seat structural design choices, which can mitigate injury potential. Recliner stiffness results indicate that stiff recliners offer injury risk reduction. A stiff head restraint that absorbs little energy mitigates injury. The seatback frame can mitigate injury by absorbing energy through plastic deformation. The risk of occupant ejection is reduced through the use of seatmounted seatbelt retractors, although dual retractor systems mounted to the vehicle's b-pillar and seat base provide comparable ramping reduction. Energy correlations have been derived that offer a first step toward relating seat design to injury.
Item Metadata
Title |
Seat structural design choices and the effect on occupant injury potential in rear end collisions
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2005
|
Description |
The seat is the most important safety device available to vehicle occupants during rear end
collisions, and thus proper design and structural integrity of the seat under expected impact
loading is essential. The objective of the current research work is to increase the understanding
of design requirements for seat performance in relation to injury producing collisions, and to
examine how various seat design parameters affect both structural integrity and occupant
protection. A numerical model-based finite element parametric sensitivity study (conducted in
LS-Dyna) was employed with the goal of assessing the effect of seat structural properties on
occupant kinematics and injury response.
A 2002 Pontiac Grand Am seat was utilized to create the base geometry for the finite element
seat model used in the study. The parametric study utilized a 50th percentile male dummy,
applied the CMVSS 202 standard crash pulse to selected structural variations of this seat, and
then utilized the neck injury criterion (NIC), neck displacement criterion (NDC) and relative
neck accelerations to assess the likelihood of injury. Seatback and recliner angle, and the degree
of seatback twist are utilized to indicate seat performance.
Based upon this work, there are significant structural components of the seat that contribute to
injury mitigation. The recliner rotational stiffness and the head restraint stiffness are the most
significant seat structural design choices, which can mitigate injury potential. Recliner stiffness
results indicate that stiff recliners offer injury risk reduction. A stiff head restraint that absorbs
little energy mitigates injury. The seatback frame can mitigate injury by absorbing energy
through plastic deformation. The risk of occupant ejection is reduced through the use of seatmounted
seatbelt retractors, although dual retractor systems mounted to the vehicle's b-pillar and
seat base provide comparable ramping reduction. Energy correlations have been derived that
offer a first step toward relating seat design to injury.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-12-11
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0080750
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2005-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.