- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Effects of component placement on patellar kinematics...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Effects of component placement on patellar kinematics and loading in intraoperative and postoperative loading configurations Brimacombe, Jill Maureen
Abstract
Postoperative patellofemoral complications and anterior knee pain contribute to suboptimal clinical outcomes following total knee replacement (TKR). Pain and complications are thought to be related to patellar tracking and loading, and the placement of the TKR implants can influence these biomechanical parameters. Surgeons aim to improve postoperative performance of the knee by optimizing intraoperative implant placement; however, they can only judge patellofemoral mechanics intraoperatively by observing passive, unloaded knee flexion. The main purpose of our study was to compare the patellar kinematics (tilt, shift and spin) and peak patellofemoral contact forces for cadaveric specimens in testing configurations designed to simulate both passive intraoperative and loaded postoperative flexion. The goal was to rank the effects of varying the placement of the TKR implants on kinematics and forces in both testing configurations. Zimmer NexGen posterior-stabilized implants were implanted in 8 fresh-frozen adult anatomic specimen knees. The knees were cycled dynamically through flexion and extension in rigs designed to simulate intraoperative and postoperative flexion. The femoral, tibial and patellar implants were modified to allow for the following changes in placement: 1) external and internal rotation of the femoral implant 2) external and internal rotation of the tibial implant 3) 3 patellar resection angles 4) 2 mediolateral patellar positions 5) additional patellar thickness. Changes in patellar tilt and shift were moderately- to well-correlated between the intraoperative and postoperative simulations (r = 0.70 to 0.85 for tilt, r = 0.54 to 0.77 for shift). The correlation indicates that changes made intraoperatively to optimize tracking will likely result in similar changes in the postoperative knee. Spin was not correlated between simulations. No changes in peak contact force were statistically significant in either testing rig and peak contact forces were not well-correlated between simulations. It is hoped that the results and protocol of this study will be used to guide a future clinical study comparing optimal intraoperative patellar tracking and loading to optimal postoperative mechanics. We also intend to use the results of this study to assist in the development of a computer assisted surgical technique for resurfacing the patella.
Item Metadata
Title |
Effects of component placement on patellar kinematics and loading in intraoperative and postoperative loading configurations
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2006
|
Description |
Postoperative patellofemoral complications and anterior knee pain contribute to suboptimal
clinical outcomes following total knee replacement (TKR). Pain and complications are thought
to be related to patellar tracking and loading, and the placement of the TKR implants can
influence these biomechanical parameters.
Surgeons aim to improve postoperative performance of the knee by optimizing intraoperative
implant placement; however, they can only judge patellofemoral mechanics intraoperatively by
observing passive, unloaded knee flexion. The main purpose of our study was to compare the
patellar kinematics (tilt, shift and spin) and peak patellofemoral contact forces for cadaveric
specimens in testing configurations designed to simulate both passive intraoperative and loaded
postoperative flexion. The goal was to rank the effects of varying the placement of the TKR
implants on kinematics and forces in both testing configurations.
Zimmer NexGen posterior-stabilized implants were implanted in 8 fresh-frozen adult anatomic
specimen knees. The knees were cycled dynamically through flexion and extension in rigs
designed to simulate intraoperative and postoperative flexion. The femoral, tibial and patellar
implants were modified to allow for the following changes in placement: 1) external and internal
rotation of the femoral implant 2) external and internal rotation of the tibial implant 3) 3 patellar
resection angles 4) 2 mediolateral patellar positions 5) additional patellar thickness.
Changes in patellar tilt and shift were moderately- to well-correlated between the intraoperative
and postoperative simulations (r = 0.70 to 0.85 for tilt, r = 0.54 to 0.77 for shift). The correlation
indicates that changes made intraoperatively to optimize tracking will likely result in similar
changes in the postoperative knee. Spin was not correlated between simulations. No changes in
peak contact force were statistically significant in either testing rig and peak contact forces were
not well-correlated between simulations.
It is hoped that the results and protocol of this study will be used to guide a future clinical study
comparing optimal intraoperative patellar tracking and loading to optimal postoperative
mechanics. We also intend to use the results of this study to assist in the development of a
computer assisted surgical technique for resurfacing the patella.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2010-01-08
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0080712
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2006-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.