- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Generalization of topological spaces
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Generalization of topological spaces Lim, Kim-Leong
Abstract
Given a set X , let P(X) be the collection of all subsets of X . A nonempty sub-collection u, of P(X) is called a generalized topology for X and the ordered pair (X, u) is called a generalized topological space or an abstract space or simply a space. Elements of u are said to be u-open and their complements are said to be u-closed. We define u-closure, u-limit point, ….. and so on in the natural way. Most of the basic notions in point set topology are defined analogously. It is expected that many important results in point set topology will not be carried over and a number of interesting properties will be lost or weakened. Nevertheless, some of them will still hold true despite the absence of the finite intersection axiom and the arbitrary union axiom for the collection of subsets. The primary objective of this thesis is to investigate which theorems in point set topology still remain valid in our more general setting. A secondary objective is to provide some counterexamples showing certain basic results in point set topology turn out to be false in the setting. It should be noted that other basic notions which are not discussed here at all can be defined similarly. However, in order to attain desirable and interesting conclusions, additional conditions must be imposed.
Item Metadata
Title |
Generalization of topological spaces
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1966
|
Description |
Given a set X , let P(X) be the collection of all subsets of X . A nonempty sub-collection u, of P(X) is called a generalized topology for X and the ordered pair (X, u) is called a generalized topological space or an abstract space or simply a space. Elements of u are said to be u-open and their complements are said to be u-closed. We define u-closure, u-limit point, ….. and so on in the natural way. Most of the basic notions in point set topology are defined analogously. It is expected that many important results in point set topology will not be carried over and a number of interesting properties will be lost or weakened. Nevertheless, some of them will still hold true despite the absence of the finite intersection axiom and the arbitrary union axiom for the collection of subsets.
The primary objective of this thesis is to investigate which theorems in point set topology still remain valid in our more general setting. A secondary objective is to provide some counterexamples showing certain basic results in point set topology turn out to be false in the setting. It should be noted that other basic notions which are not discussed here at all can be defined similarly. However, in order to attain desirable and interesting conclusions, additional conditions must be imposed.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2011-08-31
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0080589
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.