- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The effects on writing and revision of two different...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The effects on writing and revision of two different feedback methods : Teachers’s written feedback and writing conference feedback Buck, Roberta Rude
Abstract
This thesis investigates the effects of teachers' written feedback and writing conference feedback on writing and revision and on attitudes toward writing and revision. Seventeen subjects received teachers' written feedback and/or writing conference feedback on drafts of three assignments written for a university-level computer science course. Subjects also completed pre- and post-questionnaires surveying their attitudes toward writing and revision. Data collected for each writing assignment included all initial drafts, teachers' written and writing conference feedback, and all final drafts. All written and conference feedback and selected revisions were coded according to the researcher's coding schemes. Essays were holistically rated. Features of each type of feedback were assessed for their effects on writing and revision. Feedback methods were found to differentially affect revisions and between-draft holistic score differences. Feedback methods were also found to differentially affect subjects' changes in attitude toward writing and revision.
Item Metadata
Title |
The effects on writing and revision of two different feedback methods : Teachers’s written feedback and writing conference feedback
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
This thesis investigates the effects of teachers' written
feedback and writing conference feedback on writing and revision
and on attitudes toward writing and revision. Seventeen subjects
received teachers' written feedback and/or writing conference
feedback on drafts of three assignments written for a
university-level computer science course. Subjects also
completed pre- and post-questionnaires surveying their attitudes
toward writing and revision. Data collected for each writing
assignment included all initial drafts, teachers' written and
writing conference feedback, and all final drafts. All written
and conference feedback and selected revisions were coded
according to the researcher's coding schemes. Essays were
holistically rated. Features of each type of feedback were
assessed for their effects on writing and revision. Feedback
methods were found to differentially affect revisions and
between-draft holistic score differences. Feedback methods were
also found to differentially affect subjects' changes in
attitude toward writing and revision.
|
Extent |
5031916 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-01-09
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0078074
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1995-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.