- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Cruel and unusual punishment : prisoners' rights in...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Cruel and unusual punishment : prisoners' rights in the 1990's Bowman, John Ramsay
Abstract
With the tenth anniversary of the enactment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom fast approaching, this thesis is intended to evaluate the extent to which s.12 of that document has effectively impacted on prison litigation in Canada. An historical analysis of the prohibition against cruel and unusual treatment or punishment will show an encouraging swing away from the fairly restrictive interpretations of the past. An overview of the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, with its similarly worded prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments, will help to evaluate the degree to which the many U.S. prison conditions cases may be usefully applied by Canadian courts. This, along with a general look at prison litigation under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, will help assess whether the present Canadian judicial approach is still too restrictive, and the risks of that attitude becoming even more conservative. With this background established, two issues of current interest in prison life will be examined, with the aim of suggesting that existing correctional attitudes to these issues violate s.12. The treatment of prisoners infected with the AIDS virus will be the focus of one chapter. As numbers of those infected with the AIDS virus in general and prison populations continues to rise, it will be asked what might be the most practical approach to controlling this new prison "inmate". The other issue to be considered is that of prison overcrowding, and in particular, the practice of double bunking, placing two people in a cell designed for one. It will be suggested that the existing cases in this area were based on an inadequate assessment of the evidence, and that those decisions have, in any case been overtaken by the Supreme Court of Canada's developing understanding of s.12. The thesis will conclude by conceding that, despite a more liberated judicial attitude to cruel and unusual treatment or punishment in Canada, not very much has changed in prison litigation. If s.12 is to be more than a paper guarantee of rights and freedoms in the 1990's, a more interventionist approach on the part of the judiciary is clearly mandated.
Item Metadata
Title |
Cruel and unusual punishment : prisoners' rights in the 1990's
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1991
|
Description |
With the tenth anniversary of the enactment of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom
fast approaching, this thesis is intended to evaluate the extent to which s.12 of that document
has effectively impacted on prison litigation in Canada. An historical analysis of the prohibition
against cruel and unusual treatment or punishment will show an encouraging swing away from
the fairly restrictive interpretations of the past. An overview of the Eighth Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution, with its similarly worded prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments,
will help to evaluate the degree to which the many U.S. prison conditions cases may be usefully
applied by Canadian courts. This, along with a general look at prison litigation under Article 3
of the European Convention on Human Rights, will help assess whether the present Canadian
judicial approach is still too restrictive, and the risks of that attitude becoming even more
conservative.
With this background established, two issues of current interest in prison life will be examined,
with the aim of suggesting that existing correctional attitudes to these issues violate s.12. The
treatment of prisoners infected with the AIDS virus will be the focus of one chapter. As
numbers of those infected with the AIDS virus in general and prison populations continues to
rise, it will be asked what might be the most practical approach to controlling this new prison
"inmate". The other issue to be considered is that of prison overcrowding, and in particular, the
practice of double bunking, placing two people in a cell designed for one. It will be suggested
that the existing cases in this area were based on an inadequate assessment of the evidence, and
that those decisions have, in any case been overtaken by the Supreme Court of Canada's
developing understanding of s.12. The thesis will conclude by conceding that, despite a more
liberated judicial attitude to cruel and unusual treatment or punishment in Canada, not very
much has changed in prison litigation. If s.12 is to be more than a paper guarantee of rights and
freedoms in the 1990's, a more interventionist approach on the part of the judiciary is clearly
mandated.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2012-04-17
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0077768
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.