- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Customary law, the Crown and the common law : ancient...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Customary law, the Crown and the common law : ancient legal islands in the post-colonial stream Pesklevits, Richard Dale
Abstract
This thesis is a cross-disciplinary study of legal history and customary law. Respect for, and accommodation of local customary law has been a constant and integral feature of law in Britain since Anglo-Saxon times. It guided the emergence of the common law, and continues as a rule of law to the present day. Such respect and accommodation was an essential principle that permitted the peaceful consolidation of the British realms from its constituent parts. Continuity of law is a legal presumption whether territories have been added by conquest, cession or annexation. The principle respect for local legal custom was one of two schools of thought carried to Britain's overseas colonies; the other was a theory that local customary law could be extinguished by non-recognition on the part of the British sovereign or his/her delegates. Nevertheless, customary laws and institutions were explicitly and implicitly recognized in the colonial period. The doctrine has modern application with respect to the customary law ways of indigenous peoples wherever the common law has been extended overseas. Rights under customary law are distinguished from Aboriginal rights, though there is some overlap between the two. Customary law can only be extinguished by an express statute, or by clearly unavoidable implication. Legal customs are not invalid merely for being contrary to the common law. Common law defers to valid customary law as a matter of constitutional common law. But the common law provides tests by which courts can identify valid legal custom. Where a valid, unextinguished legal custom is found, courts are bound by the common law to apply it. Where customary law can be identified, it binds the servants and agents of the Crown, except when it is inconsistent with Crown sovereignty itself.
Item Metadata
Title |
Customary law, the Crown and the common law : ancient legal islands in the post-colonial stream
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2002
|
Description |
This thesis is a cross-disciplinary study of legal history and customary law. Respect for, and
accommodation of local customary law has been a constant and integral feature of law in
Britain since Anglo-Saxon times. It guided the emergence of the common law, and
continues as a rule of law to the present day. Such respect and accommodation was an
essential principle that permitted the peaceful consolidation of the British realms from its
constituent parts. Continuity of law is a legal presumption whether territories have been
added by conquest, cession or annexation. The principle respect for local legal custom was
one of two schools of thought carried to Britain's overseas colonies; the other was a theory
that local customary law could be extinguished by non-recognition on the part of the British
sovereign or his/her delegates. Nevertheless, customary laws and institutions were explicitly
and implicitly recognized in the colonial period. The doctrine has modern application with
respect to the customary law ways of indigenous peoples wherever the common law has
been extended overseas. Rights under customary law are distinguished from Aboriginal
rights, though there is some overlap between the two. Customary law can only be
extinguished by an express statute, or by clearly unavoidable implication. Legal customs are
not invalid merely for being contrary to the common law. Common law defers to valid
customary law as a matter of constitutional common law. But the common law provides
tests by which courts can identify valid legal custom. Where a valid, unextinguished legal
custom is found, courts are bound by the common law to apply it. Where customary law can
be identified, it binds the servants and agents of the Crown, except when it is inconsistent
with Crown sovereignty itself.
|
Extent |
13171708 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-08-13
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0077461
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2002-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.