Open Collections

Abstract

Clinical evidence suggests that there can be a reduction of pain by wearing a valgus knee brace for treatment of unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis of the knee (Horlick and Loomer, 1991). It has been suggested that the brace alters the orientation of the thigh and shank segments during gait in such a manner as to reduce the inter-joint pressure of the afflicted compartment. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the knee brace alters the alignment of the shank segment with respect to the thigh segment. As a part of this study twelve subjects was recruited. Each had been diagnosed with medial compartment osteoarthritis of one knee and for treatment, prescribed a valgus knee brace (Generation II Orthotics Unloader). Prior to the study, the subjects had worn the brace for over one month on a daily basis and report pain relief compared to the time before they received their brace. While walking on a treadmill at either of two speeds the each of the subjects was filmed by two gen-locked video cameras of 60 Hz. A total of five reflective markers were placed on the thigh and shank segments of the afflicted leg. After digitizing the marker points recorded by two cameras, the three dimensional coordinates were determined using the direct linear transformation method. From these data the movements and flexion, varus and axial rotation angles of the thigh and shank segments in a global coordinate system were determined. The data analyzed was the normalized average of five sequential step cycles where each cycle was the time from one heel-strike to the next heel-strike of the same foot of the afflicted leg. The values of the angles were calibrated with respect to the standing position,”no-brace” condition, i.e. those readings were taken to be the reference point for each subject. The study was a repeated measured design with two factors and 23 dependent variables. The factors of interest were brace condition: i.e., no-brace and brace, and walking speed: i.e., medium and fast. Thus, there were four conditions defined by combining the levels of the two factors. Each of the 12 subjects were tested at every condition. Therefore, the study was a (12:subject X 2:brace X 2:speed) RM design. The statistical analysis consisted of twenty three ANOVAs at the p