- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Evaluating the effect of the 1980 trawl ban in the...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Evaluating the effect of the 1980 trawl ban in the Java Sea, Indonesia Buchary, Eny
Abstract
Trawl fishing was banned in Indonesia in 1980 (except in the Arafura Sea) due to resource access conflicts between trawl operators and small-scale artisanal fishers. Recently, however, the new Indonesian government opened a debate on trawl ban revocation. This research evaluates the effect of the 1980 trawl ban on the sustainability of Java Sea fisheries, using an ecosystem approach. Three approaches were used. The first was to construct an Ecopath model for the Java Sea prior to the ban, to get a snap-shot picture of the ecosystem before fishery development escalated. The second used Ecosim, a dynamic multispecies model, to project the pre-ban model forward for 50 years. Ecosystem dynamics were examined in light of four hypothetical scenarios. The third approach employed an economic impact analysis to evaluate the economic implications of a trawl ban revocation. Results showed that the Java Sea in mid-1970s was a moderately mature and stable ecosystem, thus relatively resilient to perturbations. Various scenarios that were simulated suggested that the Java Sea was resilient enough to absorb perturbations, mainly by creating alternative stable states. However, these alternative stable states involved the loss of at least some parts of the initial food web structure. In all cases, this involved the increase of economically low-value species at the cost of the loss of economically high-value species. Economic impact analysis predicted some short-term gains by opting for the trawl ban revocation. In the long term, however, this revocation would create a greater impact on ecosystem integrity, and further reduce the economic viability of the already highlyexploited fishery. The major conclusion is that the trawl ban has not so far been able to provide enough opportunity for most of the heavily impacted fished groups to recover. The failure to recover is partly due to the concurrent and continual increase of fishing pressure from purse seiners and small scale gears. Therefore, a revocation of the trawl ban is not recommended.
Item Metadata
Title |
Evaluating the effect of the 1980 trawl ban in the Java Sea, Indonesia
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1999
|
Description |
Trawl fishing was banned in Indonesia in 1980 (except in the Arafura Sea) due to resource
access conflicts between trawl operators and small-scale artisanal fishers. Recently, however,
the new Indonesian government opened a debate on trawl ban revocation.
This research evaluates the effect of the 1980 trawl ban on the sustainability of Java Sea
fisheries, using an ecosystem approach. Three approaches were used. The first was to
construct an Ecopath model for the Java Sea prior to the ban, to get a snap-shot picture of the
ecosystem before fishery development escalated. The second used Ecosim, a dynamic
multispecies model, to project the pre-ban model forward for 50 years. Ecosystem dynamics
were examined in light of four hypothetical scenarios. The third approach employed an
economic impact analysis to evaluate the economic implications of a trawl ban revocation.
Results showed that the Java Sea in mid-1970s was a moderately mature and stable
ecosystem, thus relatively resilient to perturbations. Various scenarios that were simulated
suggested that the Java Sea was resilient enough to absorb perturbations, mainly by creating
alternative stable states. However, these alternative stable states involved the loss of at least
some parts of the initial food web structure. In all cases, this involved the increase of
economically low-value species at the cost of the loss of economically high-value species.
Economic impact analysis predicted some short-term gains by opting for the trawl ban
revocation. In the long term, however, this revocation would create a greater impact on
ecosystem integrity, and further reduce the economic viability of the already highlyexploited
fishery. The major conclusion is that the trawl ban has not so far been able to
provide enough opportunity for most of the heavily impacted fished groups to recover. The
failure to recover is partly due to the concurrent and continual increase of fishing pressure
from purse seiners and small scale gears. Therefore, a revocation of the trawl ban is not
recommended.
|
Extent |
9888860 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-06-15
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0074849
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1999-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.