- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Development of a Dyadic Partner Validation Scale
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Development of a Dyadic Partner Validation Scale Stumpe, Tiina-Mai
Abstract
Self-validation is a process of restoring or enhancing one's wellbeing around the five interrelated thematic components of the self-validation model developed by Ishiyama, (1987, 1989). The thematic components of comfort, support,and security: self-worth and self-acceptance; competence, and autonomy; identity and belonging; and love, fulfillment and meaning in life are essential for self-validation and relationship validation. The Dyadic Parmer Validation Scale was developed to measure this construct This study tested the psychometric properties of Dyadic Partner Validation Scale. Item-total correlations ranged from .24 - .93, internal consistency correlations (Cronbach alpha) at .82, .81 and .70 and with a test-retest coefficient of .79 and .85 over a three week time period. Reliability correlations for the Dyadic Partner Validation Scale were high. As hypothesized, relationship validation measured by the Dyadic Partner Validation Scale had high positive correlation (.59, .75 and .78) with relationship satisfaction measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. This hypothesis was accepted. It was hypothesized that relationship validation would have high negative correlations (.19, -.21 and -.30) with self-esteem measured by Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale and high negative correlations ( .01, -.17 and -.33) with indices of mental health measured by Hopkin's Symptom Checklist This hypothesis was not supported but the correlations were moving in the expected negative direction. The Dyadic Partner Validation Scale was found to have predictive validity with relationship satisfaction. This scale provides a useful assessment tool for clinical and research purposes in studying marital and nonmarital relationships. Limitations of the study and theoretical and clinical implications are discussed. Further scale validation is recommended, and clinicians may consider using this instrument for exploratory purposes.
Item Metadata
Title |
Development of a Dyadic Partner Validation Scale
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1992
|
Description |
Self-validation is a process of restoring or enhancing one's wellbeing around the five
interrelated thematic components of the self-validation model developed by Ishiyama, (1987,
1989). The thematic components of comfort, support,and security: self-worth and
self-acceptance; competence, and autonomy; identity and belonging; and love, fulfillment and
meaning in life are essential for self-validation and relationship validation. The Dyadic Parmer
Validation Scale was developed to measure this construct This study tested the psychometric
properties of Dyadic Partner Validation Scale. Item-total correlations ranged from .24 - .93,
internal consistency correlations (Cronbach alpha) at .82, .81 and .70 and with a test-retest
coefficient of .79 and .85 over a three week time period. Reliability correlations for the Dyadic
Partner Validation Scale were high.
As hypothesized, relationship validation measured by the Dyadic Partner Validation Scale
had high positive correlation (.59, .75 and .78) with relationship satisfaction measured by
the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. This hypothesis was accepted. It was hypothesized that relationship
validation would have high negative correlations (.19, -.21 and -.30) with self-esteem
measured by Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale and high negative correlations ( .01, -.17 and
-.33) with indices of mental health measured by Hopkin's Symptom Checklist This hypothesis
was not supported but the correlations were moving in the expected negative direction. The Dyadic
Partner Validation Scale was found to have predictive validity with relationship satisfaction. This
scale provides a useful assessment tool for clinical and research purposes in studying marital and
nonmarital relationships. Limitations of the study and theoretical and clinical implications are
discussed. Further scale validation is recommended, and clinicians may consider using this
instrument for exploratory purposes.
|
Extent |
2724728 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2008-12-18
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0054074
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1992-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.