- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Exploring the mathematical equations and empirical...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Exploring the mathematical equations and empirical properties for maximal reliability and factor determinacy in bifactor models Li, Sijia
Abstract
Bifactor models gained increasing popularity across different areas of psychology in the past two decades. Methodologists proposed that omega reliability indices, maximal reliability (i.e., coefficient H) and factor determinacy can be used for evaluating the quality of total scale and subscales, as well as whether the general and group factors are well-defined by item (sub)set in the bifactor model. However, previous literature directly imported the formula for coefficient H derived from unidimensional models, which is incorrect for bifactor models. Additionally, no previous study explored the mathematical connections between maximal reliability and factor determinacy and empirical performances in bifactor models. Therefore, I proved that coefficient H formula is incorrect for latent variables in bifactor models, and derived the correct formula for maximal reliability in bifactor models. I also proved that in bifactor models, the mathematical relationships between omega reliability, maximal reliability and factor determinacy are consistent with their relationships in unidimensional models. With the bifactor-derived formulas, I illustrated how to compute and interpret maximal reliability, factor determinacy, optimal and regression weights for general and group factors in the empirical bifactor model reported by Watts et al. (2019). In empirical bifactor models, regression factor total scores are more reliable than regression factor subscores, and regression factor scores are more reliable than sum scores. Additionally, a substantive proportion of negative regression weights are found on positively loaded items, which compromised the interpretability of regression factor scores. [An errata to this thesis was made available on 2025-01-15.]
Item Metadata
Title |
Exploring the mathematical equations and empirical properties for maximal reliability and factor determinacy in bifactor models
|
Creator | |
Supervisor | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2024
|
Description |
Bifactor models gained increasing popularity across different areas of psychology in the past two
decades. Methodologists proposed that omega reliability indices, maximal reliability (i.e.,
coefficient H) and factor determinacy can be used for evaluating the quality of total scale and
subscales, as well as whether the general and group factors are well-defined by item (sub)set in
the bifactor model. However, previous literature directly imported the formula for coefficient H
derived from unidimensional models, which is incorrect for bifactor models. Additionally, no
previous study explored the mathematical connections between maximal reliability and factor
determinacy and empirical performances in bifactor models. Therefore, I proved that coefficient
H formula is incorrect for latent variables in bifactor models, and derived the correct formula for
maximal reliability in bifactor models. I also proved that in bifactor models, the mathematical
relationships between omega reliability, maximal reliability and factor determinacy are consistent
with their relationships in unidimensional models. With the bifactor-derived formulas, I
illustrated how to compute and interpret maximal reliability, factor determinacy, optimal and
regression weights for general and group factors in the empirical bifactor model reported by Watts
et al. (2019). In empirical bifactor models, regression factor total scores are more reliable than
regression factor subscores, and regression factor scores are more reliable than sum scores.
Additionally, a substantive proportion of negative regression weights are found on positively
loaded items, which compromised the interpretability of regression factor scores. [An errata to this thesis was made available on 2025-01-15.]
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2024-09-05
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0445322
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2024-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International