- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Reliability, validity, and feasibility of remotely...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Reliability, validity, and feasibility of remotely conducting clinical balance and walking assessments via video-conferencing platforms for people following stroke Peng, Tzu-Hsuan
Abstract
This study explores reliability, validity, and feasibility of conducting clinical assessments of balance and walking ability for people post-stroke via videoconferencing.
Twenty-eight people with chronic stroke who completed the in-person Six-minute Walk Test and Community Balance and Mobility Scale were recruited. Five clinical measures were modified as virtual assessments: Five-times Sit-to-Stand (5-times STS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), tandem stance (TS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and Thirty-seconds Sit-to-Stand (30-sec STS). Sessions were conducted over video-conferencing platform. Test-retest reliability was examined by Intra-class correlations (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) to evaluate the reliability and agreement between two testing days. The magnitude of associations among in-person and virtual assessments were used to examine convergent validity using Spearman rank correlation. Feasibility was evaluated by task completion rate, adverse events, and experienced technical difficulties.
Twenty-one participants (52% female) participated both in-person and virtual assessments. There were no adverse events. Challenges of Internet connection or navigating the platform were experienced by 38% participants. The TUG, 30-sec STS, 5-times STS had good-to-excellent test-retest reliability (ICCs=0.97, 0.90, and 0.77 respectively). FRT and TS had moderate test-retest reliability (ICCs=0.54 and 0.50). The TUG, 5-times STS, and 30-sec STS had moderate-to-excellent relationships with in-person assessment (ρ= -0.55 to -0.85, P<0.001). FRT and TS showed no significant relationships with in-person assessments.
The good-to-excellent test-retest reliability of remotely conducting 5-times STS, TUG, and 30-sec STS for people with stroke, together with strong convergent validity of the measures compared to in-person 6MWT is promising. Measurement of walking and balance function in ambulatory people post-stroke over video-conferencing is feasible; however, technical challenges were experienced.
Item Metadata
| Title |
Reliability, validity, and feasibility of remotely conducting clinical balance and walking assessments via video-conferencing platforms for people following stroke
|
| Creator | |
| Supervisor | |
| Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
| Date Issued |
2021
|
| Description |
This study explores reliability, validity, and feasibility of conducting clinical assessments of balance and walking ability for people post-stroke via videoconferencing.
Twenty-eight people with chronic stroke who completed the in-person Six-minute Walk Test and Community Balance and Mobility Scale were recruited. Five clinical measures were modified as virtual assessments: Five-times Sit-to-Stand (5-times STS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), tandem stance (TS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and Thirty-seconds Sit-to-Stand (30-sec STS). Sessions were conducted over video-conferencing platform. Test-retest reliability was examined by Intra-class correlations (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) to evaluate the reliability and agreement between two testing days. The magnitude of associations among in-person and virtual assessments were used to examine convergent validity using Spearman rank correlation. Feasibility was evaluated by task completion rate, adverse events, and experienced technical difficulties.
Twenty-one participants (52% female) participated both in-person and virtual assessments. There were no adverse events. Challenges of Internet connection or navigating the platform were experienced by 38% participants. The TUG, 30-sec STS, 5-times STS had good-to-excellent test-retest reliability (ICCs=0.97, 0.90, and 0.77 respectively). FRT and TS had moderate test-retest reliability (ICCs=0.54 and 0.50). The TUG, 5-times STS, and 30-sec STS had moderate-to-excellent relationships with in-person assessment (ρ= -0.55 to -0.85, P<0.001). FRT and TS showed no significant relationships with in-person assessments.
The good-to-excellent test-retest reliability of remotely conducting 5-times STS, TUG, and 30-sec STS for people with stroke, together with strong convergent validity of the measures compared to in-person 6MWT is promising. Measurement of walking and balance function in ambulatory people post-stroke over video-conferencing is feasible; however, technical challenges were experienced.
|
| Genre | |
| Type | |
| Language |
eng
|
| Date Available |
2022-01-06
|
| Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
| Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
| DOI |
10.14288/1.0406181
|
| URI | |
| Degree (Theses) | |
| Program (Theses) | |
| Affiliation | |
| Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
| Graduation Date |
2022-05
|
| Campus | |
| Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
| Rights URI | |
| Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International