- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Linguistic dating of biblical texts : proponents, challengers...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Linguistic dating of biblical texts : proponents, challengers and Judges 5 Felushko, Brian G.
Abstract
Whether the biblical texts can or cannot be dated has a significant impact on the reliability, or usefulness in using them to reconstruct Israelite history. In addition, knowing when a text was written impacts our ability to understand what its meaning was for its readers. Some biblical texts can be dated to the post-exilic period with relative confidence based on convergences between content and historically dated extra-biblical material and/or literary sources. This corpus, for most scholars, would include Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah and Chronicles. Beyond these, however, there is much debate about whether it is possible to even provide relative dates to any other texts. Numerous scholars, past and present, confidently assert that linguistic features can date biblical texts, on the basis of typology, to at least one of three periods: pre-monarchic, pre-exilic or post-exilic. In contrast, especially since the early 1990s, numerous linguists, Hebraists, and Hebrew Bible scholars have challenged that thesis. In large part, they reject the idea that typology indicates chronology and argue rather that it is indicative of authorial/editorial style and of genre. The purpose of this paper is, first, to summarize and explain each side in this debate. This will be followed by a linguistic analysis of Judges 5 in order to demonstrate the principle that linguistic features alone are insufficient for textual dating. This conclusion will be supported through a critique of some of the essential assumptions on each side of the debate. Finally, I will offer a path through the current impasse and towards continued study and respectful discussion that will add to our knowledge and deepen our understanding of the role of linguistic features in the dating of biblical texts.
Item Metadata
Title |
Linguistic dating of biblical texts : proponents, challengers and Judges 5
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2018
|
Description |
Whether the biblical texts can or cannot be dated has a significant impact on the reliability,
or usefulness in using them to reconstruct Israelite history. In addition, knowing when a text
was written impacts our ability to understand what its meaning was for its readers. Some
biblical texts can be dated to the post-exilic period with relative confidence based on
convergences between content and historically dated extra-biblical material and/or literary
sources. This corpus, for most scholars, would include Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah and
Chronicles. Beyond these, however, there is much debate about whether it is possible to even
provide relative dates to any other texts. Numerous scholars, past and present, confidently
assert that linguistic features can date biblical texts, on the basis of typology, to at least one
of three periods: pre-monarchic, pre-exilic or post-exilic. In contrast, especially since the
early 1990s, numerous linguists, Hebraists, and Hebrew Bible scholars have challenged that
thesis. In large part, they reject the idea that typology indicates chronology and argue rather
that it is indicative of authorial/editorial style and of genre. The purpose of this paper is, first,
to summarize and explain each side in this debate. This will be followed by a linguistic
analysis of Judges 5 in order to demonstrate the principle that linguistic features alone are
insufficient for textual dating. This conclusion will be supported through a critique of some
of the essential assumptions on each side of the debate. Finally, I will offer a path through
the current impasse and towards continued study and respectful discussion that will add to
our knowledge and deepen our understanding of the role of linguistic features in the dating of
biblical texts.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2018-06-20
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0368700
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2018-09
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International