- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Refugee status determination, narrative and the oral...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Refugee status determination, narrative and the oral hearing in Australia and Canada Vogl, Anthea Fay
Abstract
In processes of refugee status determination, the applicant’s first person testimony plays a critical role. The applicant’s own testimony is often the only evidence available to support the claim being made. This thesis examines the presentation and assessment of refugee applicants’ oral testimony before the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) and the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT). In addressing the conduct of the oral hearing, a central event within refugee status determination processes, it focuses on the critical role played by the form of refugee applicants’ oral testimony. Its central question is how does the form of refugee testimony shape assessments of refugee applicants’ evidence as credible and thus, influence who may access protection and on what terms. These questions are explored through the close reading of 14 refugee applicants’ oral hearings, which took place in Australia and Canada between 2012 and 2014. In analysing the hearings, this thesis argues that the law’s requirement for evidence that is plausible and credible within refugee status determination involves an expectation that applicants present evidence in a compelling narrative form. Using the frameworks of ‘law and literature’ and narrative theory, with attention to questions of temporality, causation and plot, this thesis demonstrates that a demand for narrative structured the oral hearings. The demand encompassed expectations that applicants present evidence marked by linearity; direct and explicable causal connections; and some sense of both ‘plot’ and closure. The hearings woven through this thesis trace how decision-makers articulated such demands and explore the extent to which the demand for narrative represents the State’s requirement that refugees to narrate themselves as particular kinds of subjects, whose complex histories and experiences of fear or harm resolve in the decision to seek refugee status.
Item Metadata
Title |
Refugee status determination, narrative and the oral hearing in Australia and Canada
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2016
|
Description |
In processes of refugee status determination, the applicant’s first person testimony
plays a critical role. The applicant’s own testimony is often the only evidence
available to support the claim being made. This thesis examines the presentation and
assessment of refugee applicants’ oral testimony before the Canadian Immigration
and Refugee Board (IRB) and the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT). In
addressing the conduct of the oral hearing, a central event within refugee status
determination processes, it focuses on the critical role played by the form of refugee
applicants’ oral testimony. Its central question is how does the form of refugee
testimony shape assessments of refugee applicants’ evidence as credible and thus,
influence who may access protection and on what terms. These questions are explored
through the close reading of 14 refugee applicants’ oral hearings, which took place in
Australia and Canada between 2012 and 2014.
In analysing the hearings, this thesis argues that the law’s requirement for evidence
that is plausible and credible within refugee status determination involves an
expectation that applicants present evidence in a compelling narrative form. Using the
frameworks of ‘law and literature’ and narrative theory, with attention to questions of
temporality, causation and plot, this thesis demonstrates that a demand for narrative
structured the oral hearings. The demand encompassed expectations that applicants
present evidence marked by linearity; direct and explicable causal connections; and
some sense of both ‘plot’ and closure. The hearings woven through this thesis trace
how decision-makers articulated such demands and explore the extent to which the
demand for narrative represents the State’s requirement that refugees to narrate
themselves as particular kinds of subjects, whose complex histories and experiences
of fear or harm resolve in the decision to seek refugee status.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2017-06-30
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0305029
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2016-09
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International