- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods : a cross-sectional survey of authors from Vancouver, BC Pawliuk, Colleen; Cheng, Shannon; Zheng, Alex; Siden, Harold (Hal)
Abstract
Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered the gold standard of evidence, but many published SRs are of poor quality. This study identifies how librarian involvement in SRs is associated with quality reported methods and examines the lack of motivation for involving a librarian in SRs. Study Design and Setting: We searched databases for SRs that were published by a first or last author affiliated to a Vancouver hospital or biomedical research site and published between 2015-2019. Corresponding authors of included SRs were contacted through an email survey to determine if a librarian was involved in the SR. If a librarian was involved in the SR, the survey asked at what level the librarian was involved and if a librarian was not involved the survey asked why. Quality of reported search methods was scored independently by two reviewers. A linear regression model was used to determine the association between quality of reported search methods scores and the level at which a librarian was involved in the study. Results: 191 SRs were included in this study and 118 (62%) of the SRs authors indicated whether a librarian was involved in the SR. SRs that included a librarian as a co-author had a 15.4% higher quality assessment score than SRs that did not include a librarian. Most authors (27;75%) who did not include a librarian in their SR, did not do so because they did not believe it was necessary. Conclusion: Higher level of librarian involvement in SRs is correlated with higher scores in reported search methods. Greater advocacy or changes at the policy level is necessary to increase librarian involvement in SRs and as a result the quality of their search methods.
Item Metadata
Title |
Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods : a cross-sectional survey of authors from Vancouver, BC
|
Alternate Title |
Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher reported search methods
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Date Issued |
2024-01-11
|
Description |
Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered the gold standard of evidence, but many
published SRs are of poor quality. This study identifies how librarian involvement in SRs is
associated with quality reported methods and examines the lack of motivation for involving a
librarian in SRs. Study Design and Setting: We searched databases for SRs that were published by a first or last
author affiliated to a Vancouver hospital or biomedical research site and published between
2015-2019. Corresponding authors of included SRs were contacted through an email survey to
determine if a librarian was involved in the SR. If a librarian was involved in the SR, the survey
asked at what level the librarian was involved and if a librarian was not involved the survey
asked why. Quality of reported search methods was scored independently by two reviewers. A
linear regression model was used to determine the association between quality of reported
search methods scores and the level at which a librarian was involved in the study.
Results: 191 SRs were included in this study and 118 (62%) of the SRs authors indicated
whether a librarian was involved in the SR. SRs that included a librarian as a co-author had a
15.4% higher quality assessment score than SRs that did not include a librarian. Most authors
(27;75%) who did not include a librarian in their SR, did not do so because they did not believe
it was necessary.
Conclusion: Higher level of librarian involvement in SRs is correlated with higher scores in
reported search methods. Greater advocacy or changes at the policy level is necessary to
increase librarian involvement in SRs and as a result the quality of their search methods.
|
Subject | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2025-06-16
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0449124
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Citation |
Pawliuk, C., Cheng, S., Zheng, A., & Siden, H. (2024). Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 166, 111237
|
Publisher DOI |
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111237
|
Peer Review Status |
Reviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Researcher
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International