- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- Openness buffers the impact of Belief in Conspiracy...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
Openness buffers the impact of Belief in Conspiracy Theories on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy : Evidence from a large, representative Italian sample Li, Tania; de Girolamo, Giovanni; Zamparini, Manuel; Malvezzi, Matteo; Candini, Valentina; Calamandrei, Gemma; Starace, Fabrizio; Zarbo, Cristina; Götz, Friedrich M.
Abstract
As COVID-19 continues to incur enormous personal and societal costs, widespread vaccination against the virus remains the most effective strategy to end the pandemic. However, vaccine hes-itancy is rampant and has been steadily rising for decades. Seeking to remedy this, personality psychologists have begun to explore psychological drivers of vaccine hesitancy, including the Big Five. Openness to Experience presents itself as a vexing case as previous attempts to study its association with vaccine hesitancy have yielded mixed findings. In this preregistered study, we hypothesise that the impact of Openness to Experience on Vaccine Hesitancy depends on its interplay with other factors, namely conspiracy beliefs. To test this, we apply logistic regres-sions, simple slopes analyses, and propensity score matching to a nationally representative sam-ple of 2,500 Italian citizens, collected in May 2021. Contrary to our original hypothesis (i.e., Openness will have a positive association with Vaccine Hesitancy at high – and a negative at low – levels of Conspiracy Beliefs) we find that high Openness diminishes the impact of Belief in Conspiracy Theories on Vaccine Hesitancy. Consistent with previous research, we propose that Openness serves as a buffer against extreme positions by allowing individuals to be exposed to a greater diversity of information.
Item Metadata
Title |
Openness buffers the impact of Belief in Conspiracy Theories on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy : Evidence from a large, representative Italian sample
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
Elsevier
|
Date Issued |
2023-03-28
|
Description |
As COVID-19 continues to incur enormous personal and societal costs, widespread vaccination against the virus remains the most effective strategy to end the pandemic. However, vaccine hes-itancy is rampant and has been steadily rising for decades. Seeking to remedy this, personality psychologists have begun to explore psychological drivers of vaccine hesitancy, including the Big Five. Openness to Experience presents itself as a vexing case as previous attempts to study its association with vaccine hesitancy have yielded mixed findings. In this preregistered study, we hypothesise that the impact of Openness to Experience on Vaccine Hesitancy depends on its interplay with other factors, namely conspiracy beliefs. To test this, we apply logistic regres-sions, simple slopes analyses, and propensity score matching to a nationally representative sam-ple of 2,500 Italian citizens, collected in May 2021. Contrary to our original hypothesis (i.e., Openness will have a positive association with Vaccine Hesitancy at high – and a negative at low – levels of Conspiracy Beliefs) we find that high Openness diminishes the impact of Belief in Conspiracy Theories on Vaccine Hesitancy. Consistent with previous research, we propose that Openness serves as a buffer against extreme positions by allowing individuals to be exposed to a greater diversity of information.
|
Subject | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2025-03-28
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0445569
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Citation |
Li, T. Y., de Girolamo, G., Zamparini, M., Malvezzi, M., Candini, V., Calamandrei, G., Starace, F., Zarbo, C., & Götz, F. M. (2023). Openness buffers the impact of belief in conspiracy theories on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from a large, representative italian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 208, 112189-112189.
|
Publisher DOI |
10.1016/j.paid.2023.112189
|
Peer Review Status |
Reviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Researcher; Graduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International