- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 : evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China Jiang, Yawen; Cai, Dan; Chen, Daqin; Jiang, Shan
Abstract
Objectives The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 with regard to public health and clinical impacts by incorporating asymptomatic and presymptomatic infection and to compare the medical costs associated with the two strategies. Methods A model that consisted of six compartments was built. The compartments were the susceptible (S), the asymptomatic infective (A), the presymptomatic infective (L), the symptomatic infective (I), the recovered (R), and the deceased (D). The A, L and I classes were infective states. To construct the model, several parameters were set as fixed using existing evidence and the rest of the parameters were estimated by fitting the model to a smoothed curve of the cumulative confirmed cases in Wuhan from 24 January 2020 to 6 March 2020. Input data about the cost-effectiveness analysis were retrieved from the literature. Results Conducting RT-PCR tests three times for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 reduced the estimated total number of symptomatic cases to 45013 from 51144 in the two-test strategy over 43 days. The former strategy also led to 850.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of health gain and a net healthcare expenditure saving of CN¥49.1 million. About 100.7 QALYs of the health gain were attributable to quality-adjusted life day difference between the strategies during the analytic period and 749.4 QALYs were attributable to years of life saved. Conclusions More accurate strategies and methods of testing for the control of COVID-19 may reduce both the number of infections and the total medical costs. Increasing the number of tests should be considered in regions with relatively severe epidemics when existing tests have moderate sensitivity.
Item Metadata
Title |
The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19 : evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
BMJ
|
Date Issued |
2020-06-05
|
Description |
Objectives The objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness
of conducting three versus two reverse transcription-PCR
(RT-PCR) tests for diagnosing and discharging people with
COVID-19 with regard to public health and clinical impacts by
incorporating asymptomatic and presymptomatic infection
and to compare the medical costs associated with the two
strategies.
Methods A model that consisted of six compartments
was built. The compartments were the susceptible (S), the
asymptomatic infective (A), the presymptomatic infective
(L), the symptomatic infective (I), the recovered (R), and the
deceased (D). The A, L and I classes were infective states. To
construct the model, several parameters were set as fixed
using existing evidence and the rest of the parameters were
estimated by fitting the model to a smoothed curve of the
cumulative confirmed cases in Wuhan from 24 January 2020
to 6 March 2020. Input data about the cost-effectiveness
analysis were retrieved from the literature.
Results Conducting RT-PCR tests three times for diagnosing
and discharging people with COVID-19 reduced the
estimated total number of symptomatic cases to 45013 from
51144 in the two-test strategy over 43 days. The former
strategy also led to 850.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)
of health gain and a net healthcare expenditure saving of
CN¥49.1 million. About 100.7 QALYs of the health gain were
attributable to quality-adjusted life day difference between
the strategies during the analytic period and 749.4 QALYs
were attributable to years of life saved.
Conclusions More accurate strategies and methods of
testing for the control of COVID-19 may reduce both the
number of infections and the total medical costs. Increasing
the number of tests should be considered in regions with
relatively severe epidemics when existing tests have
moderate sensitivity.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2021-09-16
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0402163
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Citation |
Jiang Y, Cai D, Chen D, et al. The cost-effectiveness of conducting three versus two reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing and discharging people with COVID-19: evidence from the epidemic in Wuhan, China. BMJ Global Health 2020;5:e002690.
|
Publisher DOI |
10.1136/ bmjgh-2020-002690
|
Peer Review Status |
Reviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty
|
Copyright Holder |
Authors
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International