Open Collections

UBC Faculty Research and Publications

Validation and minimum important difference of the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire in fibrotic interstitial lung disease Chen, Tao; Tsai, Amy Po Yu; Hur, Seo Am; Wong, Alyson; Sadatsafavi, Mohsen; Fisher, Jolene H.; Johannson, Kerri A.; Assayag, Deborah; Morisset, Julie; Shapera, Shane; et al.

Abstract

Rationale The University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSDSOBQ) is a frequently used domain-specific dyspnea questionnaire; however, there is little information available regarding its use and minimum important difference (MID) in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). We aimed to describe the key performance characteristics of the UCSDSOBQ in this population. Methods UCSDSOBQ scores and selected anchors were measured in 1933 patients from the prospective multi-center Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Anchors included the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Concurrent validity, internal consistency, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness were assessed, followed by estimation of the MID by anchor-based (linear regression) and distribution-based methods (standard error of measurement). Results The UCSDSOBQ had a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97), no obvious floor or ceiling effect, strong correlations with SGRQ, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-VAS (|r| > 0.5), and moderate correlations with FVC%, DLCO%, and 6MWD (0.3 < |r| < 0.5). The MID estimate for UCSDSOBQ was 5 points (1–8) for the anchor-based method, and 4.5 points for the distribution-based method. Conclusion This study demonstrates the validity of UCSDSOBQ in a large and heterogeneous population of patients with fibrotic ILD, and provides a robust MID estimate of 5–8 points.

Item Metadata

Title
Validation and minimum important difference of the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire in fibrotic interstitial lung disease
Creator
Chen, Tao; Tsai, Amy Po Yu; Hur, Seo Am; Wong, Alyson; Sadatsafavi, Mohsen; Fisher, Jolene H.; Johannson, Kerri A.; Assayag, Deborah; Morisset, Julie; Shapera, Shane; Khalil, Nasreen; Fell, Charlene D.; Manganas, Helene; Cox, Gerard; To, Teresa; Gershon, Andrea S.; Hambly, Nathan; Halayko, Andrew J.; Wilcox, Pearce; Kolb, Martin; Ryerson, Christopher J.
Contributor
University of British Columbia. Centre for Heart Lung Innovation; St. Paul's Hospital (Vancouver, B.C.); University of British Columbia. Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation
Publisher
BioMed Central
Date Issued
2021-07-08
Description
Rationale The University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSDSOBQ) is a frequently used domain-specific dyspnea questionnaire; however, there is little information available regarding its use and minimum important difference (MID) in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). We aimed to describe the key performance characteristics of the UCSDSOBQ in this population. Methods UCSDSOBQ scores and selected anchors were measured in 1933 patients from the prospective multi-center Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Anchors included the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO%), and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Concurrent validity, internal consistency, ceiling and floor effects, and responsiveness were assessed, followed by estimation of the MID by anchor-based (linear regression) and distribution-based methods (standard error of measurement). Results The UCSDSOBQ had a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97), no obvious floor or ceiling effect, strong correlations with SGRQ, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-VAS (|r| > 0.5), and moderate correlations with FVC%, DLCO%, and 6MWD (0.3 < |r| < 0.5). The MID estimate for UCSDSOBQ was 5 points (1–8) for the anchor-based method, and 4.5 points for the distribution-based method. Conclusion This study demonstrates the validity of UCSDSOBQ in a large and heterogeneous population of patients with fibrotic ILD, and provides a robust MID estimate of 5–8 points.
Subject
Dyspnea; Interstitial lung disease; Pulmonary fibrosis; Minimum clinically important difference
Genre
Article
Type
Text
Language
eng
Date Available
2021-07-19
Provider
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
DOI
10.14288/1.0400473
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2429/79034
Affiliation
Medicine, Faculty of; Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of; Non UBC; Medicine, Department of
Citation
Respiratory Research. 2021 Jul 08;22(1):202
Publisher DOI
10.1186/s12931-021-01790-0
Peer Review Status
Reviewed
Scholarly Level
Faculty; Researcher; Other
Copyright Holder
The Author(s)
Rights URI
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Aggregated Source Repository
DSpace

Item Media

Item Citations and Data

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)