- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using 3 simulated barrier techniques for COVID-19 intubation : a quality assurance study Rose, Peter; Veall, John; Chima, Navraj; Vowels, Elena; Chitnis, Shruti; Flexman, Alana; Tang, Raymond
Abstract
Background: The intubation of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) puts health care workers at risk of infection through aerosol, droplet and contact contamination. We evaluated the risk of droplet and contact contamination for health care workers using 3 intubation barrier techniques as part of a quality assurance study at our institution. Methods: This randomized quality assurance study was completed at a tertiary academic hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on Apr. 4, 2020. Participants in personal protective equipment performed simulated intubations on a manikin with (a) no barrier, (b) a clear plastic sheet covering the manikin and (c) a plexiglass intubation box over the manikin, in random order. Fluorescein was ejected from inside the manikin’s mouth to simulate droplet and contact spread during a standard intubation sequence. Two blinded independent assessors evaluated the location and degree of contamination on the intubator and assistant using an ultraviolet light. Contamination severity was rated in a standard fashion (0 = none; 1 = minor; 2 = major). The primary outcome was total contamination score and secondary outcomes were scores between intubator and assistant, anatomic areas contaminated and qualitative feedback on ease of intubation. Results: Five participants completed this study. Total contamination score was different between the 3 groups for the intubator (p = 0.02) but not the assistant (p = 0.2). For the intubator, the total contamination score was higher when the sheet was used (median 29 [interquartile range (IQR) 25–34]) than when the box was used (median 17 [IQR 15–22]) or when no barrier was used (median 18 [IQR 13–21]). All 5 participants reported challenges during intubation using the sheet. Interpretation: Use of a plastic sheet while intubating patients with COVID-19 may increase the risk of droplet and contact contamination during intubation and impede intubation. Further study should be undertaken before implementing barrier techniques in practice.
Item Metadata
Title |
A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using 3 simulated barrier techniques for COVID-19 intubation : a quality assurance study
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Publisher |
Canadian Medical Association (Canada)
|
Date Issued |
2020
|
Description |
Background: The intubation of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) puts health care workers at risk of infection
through aerosol, droplet and contact contamination. We evaluated the risk of droplet and contact contamination for health care workers using 3 intubation barrier techniques as part of a quality assurance study at our institution.
Methods: This randomized quality assurance study was completed at a tertiary academic hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada, on Apr. 4, 2020. Participants in personal protective equipment performed simulated intubations on a manikin with (a) no barrier, (b) a clear plastic sheet covering the manikin and (c) a plexiglass intubation box over the manikin, in random order. Fluorescein
was ejected from inside the manikin’s mouth to simulate droplet and contact spread during a standard intubation sequence. Two
blinded independent assessors evaluated the location and degree of contamination on the intubator and assistant using an ultraviolet
light. Contamination severity was rated in a standard fashion (0 = none; 1 = minor; 2 = major). The primary outcome was total contamination score and secondary outcomes were scores between intubator and assistant, anatomic areas contaminated and qualitative feedback on ease of intubation.
Results: Five participants completed this study. Total contamination score was different between the 3 groups for the intubator
(p = 0.02) but not the assistant (p = 0.2). For the intubator, the total contamination score was higher when the sheet was used
(median 29 [interquartile range (IQR) 25–34]) than when the box was used (median 17 [IQR 15–22]) or when no barrier was
used (median 18 [IQR 13–21]). All 5 participants reported challenges during intubation using the sheet.
Interpretation: Use of a plastic sheet while intubating patients with COVID-19 may increase the risk of droplet and contact contamination during intubation and impede intubation. Further study should be undertaken before implementing barrier techniques
in practice.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2021-06-22
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0398491
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Citation |
Rose P, Veall J, Chima N, Vowels E, Chitnis S, Flexman A, et al. (2020). A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using 3 simulated barrier techniques for COVID-19 intubation: a quality assurance study. CMAJ open, 8, E554-E559.
|
Publisher DOI |
10.9778/cmajo.20200090
|
Peer Review Status |
Reviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Researcher
|
Copyright Holder |
Authors
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International