- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- Deep Dyspareunia : Review of Pathophysiology and Proposed...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
Deep Dyspareunia : Review of Pathophysiology and Proposed Future Research Priorities Orr, Natasha L.; Wahl, Kate; Joannou, Angela; Hartmann, Dee; Valle, Lisa; Yong, Paul J.; International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health. Special Interest Group on Sexual Pain
Abstract
Introduction: Dyspareunia has been traditionally divided into superficial (introital) dyspareunia and deep dyspareunia (pain with deep penetration). While deep dyspareunia can co-exist with a variety of conditions, recent work in endometriosis has demonstrated that co-existence does not necessarily imply causation. Therefore, a re-consideration of the literature is required to clarify the pathophysiology of deep dyspareunia. Aims: To review the pathophysiology of deep dyspareunia, and to propose future research priorities. Methods: Narrative review after appraisal of published frameworks and literature search with the terms (dyspareunia AND endometriosis), (dyspareunia AND deep), (dyspareunia AND (pathophysiology OR etiology)). Main Outcome Variable: Deep dyspareunia (present/absent or along a pain severity scale). Results: Potential etiologies for deep dyspareunia include gynecological, urological, gastrointestinal, nervous system, psychological, and musculoskeletal system related. These etiologies can be classified according to anatomic mechanism (contact with a tender pouch of Douglas, uterus-cervix, bladder, or pelvic floor, with deep penetration). They can also be stratified into four categories (as previously proposed for endometriosis specifically), which can be utilized to personalize management: Type I (primarily gynecologic), Type II (non-gynecologic comorbid conditions), Type III (central sensitization and genito-pelvic pain penetration disorder), and Type IV (mixed). Sociocultural and genetic factors and sexual response may also be important for deep dyspareunia. Conclusion: We propose the following eight research priorities for deep dyspareunia: 1) development of deep dyspareunia measurement tools; 2) focus on the population who are avoiding intercourse due to deep dyspareunia; 3) clarification of the role of non-gynecologic comorbidities in the generation of deep dyspareunia; 4) addressing of ethnic and other sociocultural factors; 5) initiation of clinical trials with adequate power for deep dyspareunia outcomes; 6) inclusion of partner variables; 7) elucidation of pathways between psychological factors and deep dyspareunia; and 8) empirical validation of personalized approaches to deep dyspareunia.
Item Metadata
Title |
Deep Dyspareunia : Review of Pathophysiology and Proposed Future Research Priorities
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Date Issued |
2018-10-16
|
Description |
Introduction: Dyspareunia has been traditionally divided into superficial (introital) dyspareunia and deep dyspareunia (pain with deep penetration). While deep dyspareunia can co-exist with a variety of conditions, recent work in endometriosis has demonstrated that co-existence does not necessarily imply causation. Therefore, a re-consideration of the literature is required to clarify the pathophysiology of deep dyspareunia.
Aims: To review the pathophysiology of deep dyspareunia, and to propose future research priorities.
Methods: Narrative review after appraisal of published frameworks and literature search with the terms (dyspareunia AND endometriosis), (dyspareunia AND deep), (dyspareunia AND (pathophysiology OR etiology)).
Main Outcome Variable: Deep dyspareunia (present/absent or along a pain severity scale).
Results: Potential etiologies for deep dyspareunia include gynecological, urological, gastrointestinal, nervous system, psychological, and musculoskeletal system related. These etiologies can be classified according to anatomic mechanism (contact with a tender pouch of Douglas, uterus-cervix, bladder, or pelvic floor, with deep penetration). They can also be stratified into four categories (as previously proposed for endometriosis specifically), which can be utilized to personalize management: Type I (primarily gynecologic), Type II (non-gynecologic comorbid conditions), Type III (central sensitization and genito-pelvic pain
penetration disorder), and Type IV (mixed). Sociocultural and genetic factors and sexual response may also be important for deep dyspareunia.
Conclusion: We propose the following eight research priorities for deep dyspareunia: 1) development of deep dyspareunia measurement tools; 2) focus on the population who are avoiding intercourse due to deep dyspareunia; 3) clarification of the role of non-gynecologic comorbidities in the generation of deep dyspareunia; 4) addressing of ethnic and other sociocultural factors; 5) initiation of clinical trials with adequate power for deep dyspareunia outcomes; 6) inclusion of partner variables; 7) elucidation of pathways between psychological factors and deep dyspareunia; and 8) empirical validation of personalized approaches to deep dyspareunia.
|
Subject | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2019-07-23
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0379943
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Publisher DOI |
10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.007
|
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Graduate; Undergraduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International