- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- California and the Gold Standard During the American...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
California and the Gold Standard During the American Civil War Shearer, Ronald Alexander, 1932-
Abstract
In late December 1861 the New York banks stopped redeeming their monetary liabilities in gold or silver legal tender coins. The New York suspension was followed by banks throughout the east and midwest and by the government of the United States. Combined with a subsequent act that declared United States notes (“greenbacks”) to be legal tender, the suspension effectively put most of the Union on an inconvertible paper standard. The glaring exceptions were on the Pacific coast where support for the gold standard was strong and where some states remained on the gold throughout the period of inconvertibility. The western recalcitrance with respect to the greenback standard is an interesting and puzzling episode in the American monetary history. Several questions suggest themselves. What does it mean to say that some far western states remained on the gold standard? Given the presumed supremacy of the federal government in monetary affairs, how were these states able to remain on gold while the rest of the country was on an inconvertible paper standard? What were the consequences of remaining on gold? The purpose of this paper is to explore these issues. The scope of this paper is limited in two ways. First, although the period of inconvertibility in the east extended from December 30, 1961 to January 1, 1879, I focus on the Civil War period and its 1 immediate aftermath. This was the period during which the western commitment to gold was aggressively asserted and was placed under severe political stress. Second, I limit the analysis to California. Other western states and territories either adhered to gold (Oregon and Idaho) or contained strong but defeated support for the gold standard (Washington and Nevada) but California was the leader and the lynch- pin in the western gold standard movement. If California had abandoned gold, the role of San Francisco as the financial centre for the coast made it is almost certain that the others would have also. For this reason, understanding why and how California remained on gold is fundamental to understanding the coexistence of the gold standard and an inconvertible paper standard in the United States at this time.
Item Metadata
Title |
California and the Gold Standard During the American Civil War
|
Creator | |
Date Issued |
2000-10
|
Description |
In late December 1861 the New York banks stopped redeeming
their monetary liabilities in gold or silver legal tender coins. The New
York suspension was followed by banks throughout the east and midwest
and by the government of the United States. Combined with a
subsequent act that declared United States notes (“greenbacks”) to be
legal tender, the suspension effectively put most of the Union on an
inconvertible paper standard. The glaring exceptions were on the
Pacific coast where support for the gold standard was strong and where
some states remained on the gold throughout the period of
inconvertibility. The western recalcitrance with respect to the greenback
standard is an interesting and puzzling episode in the American
monetary history. Several questions suggest themselves. What does it
mean to say that some far western states remained on the gold
standard? Given the presumed supremacy of the federal government in
monetary affairs, how were these states able to remain on gold while the
rest of the country was on an inconvertible paper standard? What were
the consequences of remaining on gold? The purpose of this paper is to
explore these issues.
The scope of this paper is limited in two ways. First, although
the period of inconvertibility in the east extended from December 30,
1961 to January 1, 1879, I focus on the Civil War period and its
1
immediate aftermath. This was the period during which the western
commitment to gold was aggressively asserted and was placed under severe
political stress. Second, I limit the analysis to California. Other western
states and territories either adhered to gold (Oregon and Idaho) or contained
strong but defeated support for the gold standard (Washington and Nevada)
but California was the leader and the lynch- pin in the western gold standard
movement. If California had abandoned gold, the role of San Francisco as
the financial centre for the coast made it is almost certain that the others
would have also. For this reason, understanding why and how California
remained on gold is fundamental to understanding the coexistence of the
gold standard and an inconvertible paper standard in the United States at this
time.
|
Geographic Location | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2017-01-27
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0340777
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International