- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Faculty Research and Publications /
- A Standardized Assessment of the Chinese Renal Nutrition...
Open Collections
UBC Faculty Research and Publications
A Standardized Assessment of the Chinese Renal Nutrition Patient Education Materials at Providence Health Care Koo, Winphia; Koh, Jiak Chin
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the 15 Chinese renal nutrition handouts developed at Providence Health Care (PHC) by using the Suitability Assessment of Material (SAM) tool. Methods: A quantitative, non-experimental survey design was used to assess overall suitability, content, literacy demand, graphics, layout and typography, learning stimulation/motivation, and cultural appropriateness of the handouts. The evaluation was done using the SAM tool. Results: Eight of the 15 handouts were found to be superior and seven adequate in overall suitability. Subscale scores identified three areas of relative weakness – lack of inclusion of summary or review, high reading grade level, and the lack of use of interactive learning stimulation. Conclusions and Implications: This systematic evaluation found that all of the 15 handouts were suitable overall. A few relative weaknesses were identified and they will be addressed at the next revision. This study also confirmed that the SAM is a feasible tool to evaluate patient education materials.
Item Metadata
Title |
A Standardized Assessment of the Chinese Renal Nutrition Patient Education Materials at Providence Health Care
|
Creator | |
Date Issued |
2016
|
Description |
Objective: This study evaluated the 15 Chinese renal nutrition handouts developed at Providence Health Care (PHC) by using the Suitability Assessment of Material (SAM) tool.
Methods: A quantitative, non-experimental survey design was used to assess overall suitability, content, literacy demand, graphics, layout and typography, learning stimulation/motivation, and cultural appropriateness of the handouts. The evaluation was done using the SAM tool.
Results: Eight of the 15 handouts were found to be superior and seven adequate in overall suitability. Subscale scores identified three areas of relative weakness – lack of inclusion of summary or review, high reading grade level, and the lack of use of interactive learning stimulation.
Conclusions and Implications: This systematic evaluation found that all of the 15 handouts were suitable overall. A few relative weaknesses were identified and they will be addressed at the next revision. This study also confirmed that the SAM is a feasible tool to evaluate patient education materials.
|
Subject | |
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2017-01-31
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0320961
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Faculty; Other
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International