http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0314278
data provider: CONTENTdm
is referenced by: http://resolve.library.ubc.ca/cgi-bin/catsearch
is part of: British Columbia Historical Books Collection
is part of: Fur seal arbitration
creator: Bering Sea Tribunal of Arbitration
issued: 2016-09-14
issued: 1895
description: "Fur-seal arbitration. The counter case of the United States before the Tribunal of Arbitration to convene at Paris under the provisions of the treaty between the United States of America and Great Britain, concluded February 29, 1892. Including appendix" -- First page "([United States] 53d Cong., 2d sess. Senate. Ex. doc. 177, pts. 1-16)" -- Lowther, B. J., & Laing, M. (1968). A bibliography of British Columbia: Laying the foundations, 1849-1899. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria, p. 126.
aggregated CHO: https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/bcbooks/items/1.0314278/source.json
extent: xi, 470 pages : illustrations, photographs, maps (folded), tables (folded) ; 24 cm
format: application/pdf
note: FUR SEAL ARBITRATION. PROCEEDINGS Tribunal of Arbitration, CONVENED AT PARIS TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN CONCLUDED AT WASHINGTON FEBRUARY so, 1893, DETERMINATION OF QUESTIONS BETWEEN THE TWO GOVERNMENTS CONCERNING THE JURISDICTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES WATERS OF BERING SEA. VOLUME VII. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1895. /57, H-fo S3/34 *7 FUR-SEAL ARBITRATION. THE COUNTER CASE OS The United States TRIBUNAL OF ARBITRATION TO CONVENE AT PAEIS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND GREAT BRITAIN, CONCLUDED FEBRUARY 29, 1892. INCLUDING APPENDIX. ■WASHINGTON, D. C.: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. • 1893. TABLE OF CONTENTS COUNTER CASE. INTRODUCTION. The Counter Case of the United States: I Its object Original British Case and supplement PART FIRST. reply of the united states to the british case first presented. The True Issues in the Present Controversy: Difference of views as to the object of the present arbitration Protection of seals the main object of the arbitration Origin of the controversy as to jurisdiction " Lord Salisbury's reference to the Russian ukase Mr. Bayard invites international cooperation Mr. Blaine's statement of the issues H Justification of seizures of sealing vessels Lord Salisbury again introduces the ukase The United States sought international agreement. eThe Erroneous Translation of Certain Russian Documents:. Imposition practiced upon the United States Government Partial restatement of its case necessary The Situation about Bering Sea and on the Northwest Coast down to the Treaties of 1824-'25: Russia's colonial system Ukase of 1799 Chapter I of British Case Distinction between Bering Sea region and Pacific Ocean Ukase of 1821 in IV TABLE OF CONTENTS. The Situation about Bering Sea, etc.—Continued. Character of control claimed over Bering Sea No exclusive territorial jurisdiction claimed Protests against ukase and resulting treaties Case of tbe Pearl Period…
has type: Books
has type: Legislative proceedings
identifier: JX238.F8 1895
is shown at: 10.14288/1.0314278
language: English
provider: Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
publisher: Washington : Government Printing Office
rights: Images provided for research and reference use only. For permission to publish, copy, or otherwise distribute these images please contact digital.initiatives@ubc.ca.
source: Original Format: University of British Columbia. Library. Rare Books and Special Collections. JX238 .F8 1895
subject: Bering Sea controversy
subject: Sealing
title: Fur seal arbitration. Proceedings of the Tribunal of Arbitration, convened at Paris under the treaty between the United States of America and Great Britain concluded at Washington February 29, 1892, for the determination of questions between the two governments concerning the jurisdictional rights of the United States in the waters of Bering Sea. Volume VII
type: Text