The philosophy of Bernard Bosanquet
department or school: Arts, Faculty of
department or school: Philosophy, Department of
data provider: DSpace
degree campus: UBCV
creator: Stedman, Ralph Elliott
issued: 2010-03-17T18:19:18Z
issued: 1928
related degree: Master of Arts - MA
degree grantor: University of British Columbia
description: [No abstract available]
aggregated CHO: https://circle.library.ubc.ca/rest/handle/2429/22000
note: THE PHILOSOPHY of BERNARD BOSANQUET t>y Ralph Elliott Stedman \ A Thesis submitted for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of PHILOSOPHY The University of British Columbia April - 1928 THE PHILOSOPHY OF BERNARD BOSANQUET PREFACE In undertaking a work of this kind it is obvious that the writer, inasmuch as his appreciation"of his subject expands geometrically with greater understanding of and penetration into it, will always feel that his task is poorly done. This essay is rather an attempt to understand Bosanquet's thought than to criticise and evaluate it Justly. It is certain that criticism will creep in, at least in implication, and that evaluation cannot be escaped even in exposition. It should suffice to say that, at present, Bosanquet's position seems to the writer to be trery strong; and far more comprehensive and thorough than any of the somewhat easy-going pluralisms which are springing up around us. That there are difficulties remainiiig none can doubt, but this study is a beginning rather than an end. CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTORY Chapter I His Life " II His Philosophical Affiliations 1. Remote a.Plato b.Spinoza c.Rousseau a.Hegel. E. Immediate a.Green and the Neo-Hegelians b.Bradley. " III Some General Comments Concerning His Philosophy. 1. Originality S. Peculiarities of His Idealism. a.Its placing of Mind. b.Not Subjectivism c.Not an "ancilla fidei" 3. His Starting Point. a.The'best of experience.' b.The 'full impression' c.importance and Reality' 4. Comparison with Bradley. a.Positive and optimistic "b.Diffusene3s of style and argument. CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTORY Chapter I His Life " II His Philosophical Affiliations 1. Remote a.Plato b.Spinoza c.Rousseau a.Hegel. E. Immediate a.Green and the Neo-Hegelians b.Bradley. " III Some General Comments Concerning His Philosophy. 1. Originality S. Peculiarities of His Idealism. a.Its placing of Mind. b.Not Subjectivism c.Not an "ancilla fidei" 3. His Starting Point. a.The'best of experience.' b.The…
has type: Thesis/Dissertation
is shown at: 10.14288/1.0094902
language: eng
degree discipline: Philosophy
provider: Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
publisher: University of British Columbia
rights: For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
scholar level: Graduate
type: Text
identifier URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/22000