A scoping review of resilience among transition-age youth with serious mental illness : tensions, knowledge gaps, and future directions
department or school: Medicine, Faculty of
department or school: Non UBC
department or school: Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Department of
data provider: DSpace
identifier citation: BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 07;23(1):660
contributor: Providence Health Care (Vancouver, B.C.). Research Institute
rights copyright: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature
creator: Nesbitt, Amy E.
creator: Sabiston, Catherine M.
creator: deJonge, Melissa L.
creator: Barbic, Skye
creator: Kozloff, Nicole
creator: Nalder, Emily J.
issued: 2024-12-10T23:42:09Z
issued: 2023-09-07
description: Introduction: The study of resilience among transition-age youth (aged 16–29 years) living with serious mental illness (SMI) has provided a promising new direction for research with the capacity to explore individuals’ strengths and resources. However, variability in how resilience is defined and measured has led to a lack of conceptual clarity. A comprehensive synthesis is needed to understand current trends and gaps in resilience research among this population. The purpose of the current study was to map how resilience has been conceptualized and operationalized among transition-age youth with SMI, explore resilience factors and outcomes that have been studied, and recommend areas for future research. Methods: A six-stage scoping review methodology was used to systematically identify relevant empirical literature across multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus), addressing transition-age youth diagnosed with SMI and resilience. Topic consultation and reaction meetings were conducted to gather feedback from transition-age youth with SMI, researchers, and clinicians during the review process to enhance the applicability of the review findings. A meta-narrative approach was used to organize included studies into research traditions (i.e., paradigms of inquiry with similar storylines, theoretical and methodological orientations). Resilience factors and outcomes, and the consultative meetings, were analyzed using content analysis. Results: Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria (14 quantitative, 9 qualitative, 1 mixed-method). Four research traditions were identified, each contributing a unique storyline which conceptualized and operationalized resilience in slightly different ways: Stress Adaptation, Person-Environment Interactions, Recovery-Focused, and Critical and Cultural Perspectives. Resilience factors and outcomes were most commonly evaluated at the individual-level or within the immediate environment (e.g., personal characteristi…
aggregated CHO: https://circle.library.ubc.ca/rest/handle/2429/89829
note: Nesbitt et al. BMC Psychiatry (2023) 23:660 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05158-0RESEARCH Open Access© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom-mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.BMC PsychiatryA scoping review of resilience among transition-age youth with serious mental illness: tensions, knowledge gaps, and future directionsAmy E. Nesbitt1*, Catherine M. Sabiston2, Melissa L. deJonge2, Skye P. Barbic3,4,5, Nicole Kozloff6,7 and Emily J. Nalder1,8 Abstract Introduction The study of resilience among transition-age youth (aged 16–29 years) living with serious mental illness (SMI) has provided a promising new direction for research with the capacity to explore individuals’ strengths and resources. However, variability in how resilience is defined and measured has led to a lack of conceptual clarity. A comprehensive synthesis is needed to understand current trends and gaps in resilience research among this popu-lation. The purpose of the current study was to map how resilience h…
has type: Article
is shown at: 10.14288/1.0447440
language: eng
peer review status: Reviewed
provider: Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
publisher: BioMed Central
publisher DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05158-0
rights: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
rights URI: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
scholar level: Faculty
scholar level: Researcher
scholar level: Other
subject: Adolescent
subject: Young adult
subject: Resilience
subject: Mental health
subject: Review
subject: Advisory group
type: Text
identifier URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/89829