Education, Faculty of
Language and Literacy Education (LLED), Department of
DSpace
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications
Norton, Bonny, 1956-
This is a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND) digital copy of the following book: Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Identity and Language Learning draws on a longitudinal case study of immigrant women in Canada to develop new ideas about identity, investment, and imagined communities in the field of language learning and teaching. Bonny Norton demonstrates that a poststructuralist conception of identity as multiple, a site of struggle, and subject to change across time and place is highly productive for understanding language learning. Her sociological construct of investment is an important complement to psychological theories of motivation. The implications for language teaching and teacher education are profound.Now including a new, comprehensive Introduction as well as an Afterword by Claire Kramsch, this second edition addresses the following central questions:- Under what conditions do language learners speak, listen, read and write?- How are relations of power implicated in the negotiation of identity? - How can teachers address the investments and imagined identities of learners?The book integrates research, theory, and classroom practice, and is essential reading for students, teachers and researchers in the fields of language learning and teaching, TESOL, applied linguistics and literacy.“The publication of Bonny Norton’s Identity and Language Learning in 2000 was a landmark moment in the field of additional/second language learning. The countless discussions in journal articles, research reports and PhD theses in the past decade testify to the power of her multi-faceted and generative ideas. I have no doubt that this revised edition will be on the ‘must read’ list of anyone concerned with additional/second language learning and language education more generally.”Constant Leung, King’s College, University of London, UK“Uniting impeccable scholarship and an enduring passion for social justice, Bonny Norton’s 2000 book Identity and Language Learning is republished here with a magisterial new Introduction by the author and an inspirational Afterword by Claire Kramsch. The book demonstrates anew the intrinsic power of Norton’s constructs of investment, imagined identities and imagined communities, and the paradigm-shifting impact of her theory of identity on an ever-expanding set of questions, contexts, and interdisciplinary approaches to research and teaching in second language education and applied linguistics.” Nancy Hornberger, University of Pennsylvania, USA“Since the publication of the first, pathbreaking edition of this now-classic text, identity has become a central term through which applied linguists have been able to explore the changing, complex and contradictory struggles we encounter as we learn languages. This book has become one of the most significant of the last decade, and will continue to provoke thought, research and discussion for another decade. A key text for any applied linguist.”Alastair Pennycook, University of Technology, Sydney, AustraliaBonny Norton is a Professor and Distinguished University Scholar in the Department of Language and Literacy Education, University of British Columbia, Canada. She is committed to social change through the power of ideas and the integration of theory, research, and practice. In 2010 she was the inaugural recipient of the “Senior Researcher Award” by the Second Language Research group of AERA (American Educational Research Association) and in 2012 was inducted as an AERA Fellow. Her website can be found at http://www.educ.ubc.ca/faculty/norton/Identity and Language LearningFull details of all our publications can be found on http://www.multilingual-matters.com, or by writing to Multilingual Matters, St Nicholas House, 31–34 High Street, Bristol BS1 2AW, UK.Identity and Language LearningExtending the ConversationSecond editionBonny NortonAfterword: Claire KramschMULTILINGUAL MATTERSBristol • Buffalo • TorontoLibrary of Congress Cataloging in Publication DataNorton, Bonny Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation/Bonny Norton. 2nd Edition.Includes bibliographical references and index.1. Second language acquisition. 2. Language and languages – Study and teaching. I. Title. P118.2.N67 2012418.0071–dc23 2013022866British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue entry for this book is available from the British Library.ISBN-13: 978-1-78309-055-6 (hbk)ISBN-13: 978-1-78309-054-9 (pbk)Multilingual MattersUK: St Nicholas House, 31–34 High Street, Bristol BS1 2AW, UK.USA: UTP, 2250 Military Road, Tonawanda, NY 14150, USA.Canada: UTP, 5201 Dufferin Street, North York, Ontario M3H 5T8, Canada.Copyright © 2013 Bonny Norton.All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher.The policy of Multilingual Matters/Channel View Publications is to use papers that are natural, renewable and recyclable products, made from wood grown in sustainable forests. In the manufacturing process of our books, and to further support our policy, preference is given to printers that have FSC and PEFC Chain of Custody certifi cation. The FSC and/or PEFC logos will appear on those books where full certifi cation has been granted to the printer concerned.Typeset by Techset Composition India (P) Ltd., Bangalore and Chennai, India.Printed and bound in Great Britain by Short Run Press Ltd.For Anthony, Julia and Michael,who fill my life with love, joy and meaning.Language is the place where actual and possible forms of social organization and their likely social and political consequences are defined and contested. Yet it is also the place where our sense of ourselves, our subjectivity, is constructed.Weedon, 1997, p. 21Just as, at the level of relations between groups, a language is worth what those who speak it are worth, so too, at the level of interactions between individuals, speech always owes a major part of its value to the value of the person who utters it.Bourdieu, 1977, p. 652viiContentsPreface ixIntroduction 1Revisiting Identity and Language Learning 1Relevance of Identity Research to Language Learning 2Poststructuralist Theories of Identity 3Identity and Investment 5Imagined Communities and Imagined Identities 8Identity Categories and Language Learning 11Methods and Analysis of Research 13Identity and Language Teaching 16Emerging Themes and Future Directions 22Structure of the Book 261 Fact and Fiction in Language Learning 41Saliha and the SLA Canon 42Identity and Language Learning 44Power and Identity 46Motivation and Investment 50Ethnicity, Gender and Class 52Rethinking Language and Communicative Competence 532 Researching Identity and Language Learning 58Methodological Framework 58Central Questions 60The Researcher and the Researched 60The Project 62Data Organization 71Comment 733 The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 76The International Context 76The Canadian World of Immigrant Women 80Biography, Identity and Language Learning 85Comment 954 Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 97Eva 98Mai 1115 Mothers, Migration and Language Learning 124Katarina 126Martina 131Felicia 138Comment 1446 Second Language Acquisition Theory Revisited 146Natural Language Learning 147Alberto and The Acculturation Model of SLA 150The Affective Filter 156Reconceptualizing Identity 161Language Learning as a Social Practice 166Comment 1687 Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communities 170Formal Language Learning and Adult Immigrants 171Beyond Communicative Language Teaching 175Rethinking Multiculturalism 179The Diary Study as a Pedagogy of Possibility 182Transforming Monday Morning 188Concluding Comment 190Afterword: Claire Kramsch 192Why the Interest in Social and Cultural Identity in SLA? 193Three Influential Concepts 195The Future of the ‘Right to Speak’ 196Discussion 197Conclusion 199References 202Index 211viii Ident ity and Language LearningixPrefaceAbout three years ago, a student in one of my classes at the University of British Columbia (UBC) asked me why my 2000 book, Identity and Language Learning, was not available as an e-book. Once again, my students had caught me off-guard in the realm of technology. We embarked on a class discussion on the merits of e-books for them, and my students informed me that e-books are much more affordable than printed texts, a very important con-sideration for them; and they are also more accessible, portable, storable, and searchable. Convinced, I entered into an agreement with Multilingual Matters to publish a second edition of my 2000 book in both electronic and print format. The second edition includes a new comprehensive Introduction, updating the literature on identity and language learning, as well as an insightful Afterword by Claire Kramsch, which locates the book within its wider historical and disciplinary context. I am very grateful to Claire for her outstanding scholarship and her generosity of spirit. Warm thanks also to Tommi Grover, Anna Roderick and the remarkable team at Multilingual Matters for helping to sustain and extend the global conversation on identity and language learning.In my post-2000 research journey, I have been privileged to publish col-laboratively with a number of colleagues who share an interest in identity and language learning, and whose influence is pervasive in the Introduction to the second edition. The process of co-editing books and journal special issues with Kelleen Toohey, Christina Higgins, Yasuko Kanno, and Aneta Pavlenko has been inspiring. I have also greatly enjoyed co-publishing with Margaret Early, Maureen Kendrick, Carolyn McKinney, Lyndsay Moffatt, Diane Dagenais, Gao Yihong, Margaret Hawkins, Brian Morgan, and Sue Starfield. Doctoral students have injected my research with energy and insight, and I thank, in particular, Juliet Tembe, Harriet Mutonyi, Shelley Jones, Sam Andema, Ena Lee, Sal Muthayan, Lauryn Oates, and Espen Stranger-Johannessen. At the University of British Columbia, I have benefited greatly from regular interaction with a remarkable group of colleagues, including Patricia Duff, Lee Gunderson, Ryuko Kubota, Ling Shi, and Steven Talmy. After working closely with all of these exciting scholars, over many years, the distinction between ‘colleague’ and ‘friend’ becomes difficult to draw.As seasoned scholars know, the peer review process in academia demands great commitment from members of our community, and I wish to acknowledge the unfailing support I have received over the years, not only from Claire Kramsch, but also from Nancy Hornberger, Constant Leung, Alastair Pennycook, Sandra Silberstein, Mastin Prinsloo, Jim Cummins, and Allan Luke. I would like to acknowledge insightful com-ments on the Introduction by Peter De Costa, and I am grateful to my stu-dent Ron Darvin for his help with copy-editing and cover design. Warmest thanks also to the hundreds of emerging and established scholars, in every region of the world, who have challenged and enlightened me – online, in print, and face-to-face at conferences, workshops, and seminars. You know who you are.Generous funding from the Social Sciences and Research Council of Canada has been pivotal in every aspect of my research and publication pro-gram. I am very grateful for the opportunities this funding has provided.The unconditional love of Anthony, Julia, and Michael sustains me every day.Bonny NortonUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver, CanadaApril, 2013.x Ident ity and Language Learning1IntroductionRevisiting Identity and Language LearningClaire Kramsch notes in the Afterword of this book that the publication of Identity and Language Learning in 2000 captured an important shift in the spirit of the times. There is now a wealth of research that explores identity in language education, and the multiple volumes that have appeared are tes-tament to the fact that issues of identity have become central to the field.1 ‘Identity’ features in most encyclopedias and handbooks of applied lin-guistics, second language acquisition (SLA) and language teaching.2 There is also an award-winning journal, the Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, which focuses on issues of identity in the field of language education. Of particular interest is the number of graduate student theses and dissertations that have been written on the topic of identity, investment and imagined communities, suggesting that emerging researchers will continue this trajec-tory of research in the future.3 Translations of my work now appear in Chinese, Portuguese, German and French.4 Indeed, as Zuengler and Miller note (2006, p. 43), identity is now established as a research area ‘in its own right’.As indicated in the Preface to this second edition, my purpose is not to rewrite the 2000 book, which has its own logic and coherence, but rather to reframe it with reference to ideas proposed in the book that have proved to be particularly productive in the field. In this regard, not only have post-structuralist theories of language and identity been highly influential, as scholars such as Block (2007a), Ricento (2005) and Swain and Deters (2007) note, but also the construct of investment I developed in 1995 (Norton Peirce, 1995) has been taken up in diverse and interesting ways, as have subsequent ideas about imagined communities and imagined identities. There is also a growing body of research by a wide range of identity theorists that seeks to investigate the ways in which particular relations of race, gender, class and sexual orientation may impact the process of language learning and teaching. In addition, there has been discussion on research methods associated with investigations on identity, as well as implications of identity research for classroom teaching. As indicated in the Preface, this Introduction draws on exciting collaborative research with diverse scholars over more than a decade.5 It will focus on expanding areas of research and practice, making connections to research findings and ideas proposed in the first edition of this book.Relevance of Identity Research to Language LearningI begin this Introduction with a backward glance at scholars such as Sue Gass (Gass, 1998), who have noted that identity theorists need to establish the theoretical relevance of identity research insofar as it affects the acquisi-tion of a second language. Here I respond to this important and legitimate observation. The central arguments I make in this regard are summarized below and then developed more fully in subsequent sections. (i) Work on identity offers the field of language learning a comprehensive theory that integrates the individual language learner and the larger social world. Identity theorists question the view that learners can be defined in binary terms as motivated or unmotivated, introverted or extroverted, inhibited or uninhibited, without considering that such affective factors are frequently socially constructed in inequitable rela-tions of power, changing across time and space, and possibly coexisting in contradictory ways within a single individual. A fully developed theory of identity highlights the multiple positions from which lan-guage learners can speak, and how sometimes marginalized learners can appropriate more desirable identities with respect to the target language community. (ii) SLA theorists need to address how relations of power in the social world affect learners’ access to the target language community; learners who may be marginalized in one site may be highly valued in another. Identity theorists are therefore concerned about the ways in which opportunities to practice speaking, reading and writing, acknowledged as central to the SLA process (cf. Spolsky, 1989), are socially structured in both formal and informal sites of language learning. This has impor-tant implications for the conditions under which learners speak, read or write the target language, and hence opportunities for language learning.(iii) Identity, practices and resources are mutually constitutive. This suggests that identity is influenced by practices common to institutions such as homes, schools and workplaces, as well as available resources, whether they are symbolic or material. Examination of the practices and resources of particular settings, and of learners’ differential access to those practices and resources, offers a means to theorize how identities 2 Ident ity and Language Learningare produced and negotiated. At the same time, structural conditions and social contexts do not entirely determine language learning or use. Through human agency, language learners who struggle to speak from one identity position may be able to reframe their relationship with others and claim alternative, more powerful identities from which to speak, read or write, thereby enhancing language acquisition.(iv) The sociological construct of investment, which I developed to comple-ment the psychological construct of motivation in SLA, is a construct that signals the complex relationship between language learner identity and language learning commitment. I argue that a learner may be a highly motivated language learner, but may nevertheless have little investment in the language practices of a given classroom or commu-nity. The classroom, for example, may be racist, sexist, elitist or homo-phobic. Alternatively, the language practices of the classroom may not be consistent with learner expectations of good teaching, with equally dire results for language learning. In sum, a learner can be highly moti-vated to learn a language, but not necessarily invested in a given set of language practices. However, a learner who is invested in a given set of language practices would most likely be a motivated language learner. Investment has become an important explanatory construct in language learning and teaching (Cummins, 2006). (v) Recent research on imagined communities and imagined identities is the- oretically generative for SLA theory. The term ‘imagined community’, originally coined by Benedict Anderson (1991), was explored in my 2001 chapter (Norton, 2001), and further developed in Kanno and Norton (2003), Pavlenko and Norton (2007) and Norton and Gao (2008). In these publications, we argue that in many language classrooms, the target language community may be, to some extent, a reconstruction of past communities and historically constituted relationships, but also a community of the imagination, a desired community that offers possi-bilities for an enhanced range of identity options in the future. These ideas, inspired also by Lave and Wenger (1991) and Wenger (1998), have proved generative in diverse research sites. I have argued that an imag-ined community assumes an imagined identity, and a learner’s invest-ment in the target language can be understood within this context.Poststructuralist Theories of IdentityIn the first edition of my book, I drew extensively on poststructuralist theories of identity associated with the work of feminist scholars such as Christine Weedon (1987/1997). Like other poststructuralist theorists who inform her work, Weedon has foregrounded the central role of language in her analysis of the relationship between the individual and the social, arguing Introduct ion 3that language not only defines institutional practices but also serves to con-struct our sense of ourselves – our subjectivity: ‘Language is the place where actual and possible forms of social organisation and their likely social and political consequences are defined and contested. Yet it is also the place where our sense of ourselves, our subjectivity, is constructed’ (1997, p. 21).The use of the term subjectivity, derived from the term subject, is com-pelling because it serves as a reminder that a person’s identity must always be understood in relational terms: one is often subject of a set of relation-ships (i.e. in a position of power) or subject to a set of relationships (i.e. in a position of reduced power). Weedon noted that the terms ‘subject’ and ‘sub-jectivity’ signify a different conception of the individual than that associ-ated with humanist conceptions of the individual dominant in Western philosophy. While humanist conceptions of the individual presuppose that every person has an essential, unique, fixed and coherent core, poststruc- turalism depicts the individual (i.e. the subject) as diverse, contradictory, dynamic and changing over historical time and social space. Drawing on the Foucauldian notions of discourse and historical specificity, subjectivity in poststructuralism is understood as discursively constructed and as always socially and historically embedded. Further, as Weedon notes, identity is constituted in and through language. By extension, every time language learners speak, read or write the target language, they are not only exchang-ing information with members of the target language community, they are also organizing and reorganizing a sense of who they are and how they relate to the social world. As such, they are engaged in identity construction and negotiation.As I argued in the first edition, poststructuralist theory has led me to define identity as the way a person understands his or her relationship to the world, how that relationship is constructed across time and space, and how the person understands possibilities for the future. It is the importance of the future that is central to the lives of many language learners, and is integral to an understanding of both identity and investment.Poststructuralist approaches to theorizing identity have also been fruit-fully put to work by cultural theorist Stuart Hall (1992a, 1992b, 1997) and post-colonial theorist Homi Bhabha (1994) to de-essentialize and decon-struct identity categories such as race and gender. In theorizing cultural iden-tity, Hall focuses on identity as in-process, and stresses the importance of representation following from the discursive construction of identity. In his notion of new ethnicities, Hall provides an alternative theorizing of race that recognizes experiences of race without homogenizing them. Hall emphasizes a multi-faceted rootedness which is not limited to ethnic minori-ties and which can be applied to other forms of difference.Poststructuralist theories of positioning are also of interest to identity researchers. As a theoretical construct, positioning is most often associated with the work of Davies and Harré (1990), who sought to challenge the 4 Ident ity and Language Learningadequacy of the concept of ‘role’ in developing a social psychology of selfhood. They and other poststructuralist theorists have reminded us of the contingent, shifting and context-dependent nature of identities, and empha-sized that identities are not merely given by social structures or ascribed by others, but are also negotiated by agents who wish to position themselves. The recognition of positioning in social structures, but also individual agency, has been important in many studies of language learning. Menard-Warwick (2007), for example, described a vocational English as a second language (ESL) class in which she was able to identify particular episodes of positioning on the part of both the teacher and her Latina students that had effects on how learners were able to claim ‘voice’ in the classroom. The importance of investigating student positionings is also underscored in De Costa (2011), who examined the ways in which a Chinese immigrant stu-dent in a Singapore secondary school was positioned by her classmates and teachers, and how she in turn positioned herself during her interactions with them. Coupling the construct of positioning with the notion of language ideology, he demonstrated how his focal student’s positionings and language ideologies ultimately impacted her English language learning outcomes.As Brian Morgan and I have noted (Morgan, 2007; Norton & Morgan, 2013), poststructuralist theories of identity are liberating not only in desta-bilizing essentialist notions of identity but in challenging dominant theories of knowledge and text, while providing powerful conceptual tools that help to expose the partiality of claims to truth. At the same time, however, post-structuralist theories of identity raise a number of unsettling issues. One key challenge concerns the notion of agency with respect to a student or teacher’s capacity to question dominant meanings and resist essentialized identities. To what extent is agency a quality that pre-exists discourse? Menard-Warwick (2006) makes the case that Bakhtin’s theories of language (Bakhtin, 1981, 1984) have the potential to resolve some of the contradictions between continuity and change that characterize debates on identity in the fields of SLA and literacy. A second challenge concerns the theorizing of identity as multiple: there are occasions when students or teachers may wish to assert their identities as homogenous and unitary, foregrounding a particular aspect of their experience such as gender, race, class, sexual orientation or religious affiliation. We see this in the current strength of nationalisms and religious fundamentalism in different parts of the globe. The terms identity politics or the politics of difference reference this particular coalescence of identity and power relations.Identity and InvestmentIn my research with immigrant women in Canada, as discussed in the first edition of Identity and Language Learning, I observed that existing theories Introduct ion 5of motivation in the field of SLA were not consistent with the findings from my research. Most theories at the time assumed motivation was a character trait of the individual language learner and that learners who failed to learn the target language were not sufficiently committed to the learning process. Further, theories of motivation did not pay sufficient attention to unequal relations of power between language learners and target language speakers. My research found that high levels of motivation did not necessarily trans-late into good language learning, and that unequal relations of power between language learners and target language speakers was a common theme in the data. For this reason, I developed the construct of ‘investment’ to complement constructs of motivation in the field of language learning and teaching.The construct of investment offers a way to understand learners’ variable desires to engage in social interaction and community practices. Inspired by the work of Bourdieu (1977, 1984, 1991), it signals the socially and historic- ally constructed relationship of learners to the target language and their often ambivalent desire to learn and practice it. If learners ‘invest’ in the target language, they do so with the understanding that they will acquire a wider range of symbolic resources (language, education, friendship) and material resources (capital goods, real estate, money), which will in turn increase the value of their cultural capital and social power. Bourdieu and Passeron (1977) use the term ‘cultural capital’ to reference the knowledge, credentials and modes of thought that characterize different classes and groups in relation to specific sets of social forms. They argue that cultural capital is situated, in that it has differential exchange value in different social fields. As the value of their cultural capital increases, so learners’ sense of themselves and their desires for the future are reassessed. Hence, as I argued in earlier work, there is an integral relationship between investment and identity. Further, while motivation can be seen as a primarily psychological construct (Dörnyei, 2001; Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2009), investment must be seen within a sociological framework, and seeks to make a meaningful con-nection between a learner’s desire and commitment to learn a language, and their complex and changing identity.The construct of investment provides for a particular set of questions associated with a learner’s commitment to learning the target language. In addition to asking, for example, ‘To what extent is the learner motivated to learn the target language?’, the teacher or researcher asks, ‘What is the learn-er’s investment in the language practices of this classroom or community?’ A learner may be a highly motivated language learner but may nevertheless have little investment in the language practices of a given classroom or com-munity, which may, for example, be racist, sexist, elitist or homophobic. Thus, despite being highly motivated, a learner could be excluded from the language practices of a classroom, and in time positioned as a ‘poor’ or unmo-tivated language learner (see Norton & Toohey, 2001). Alternatively, the 6 Ident ity and Language Learninglearner’s expectations of good language teaching may not be consistent with the language practices promoted by the teacher in the classroom. The learner may therefore resist participating in the language practices of the classroom, with equally dire results (Talmy, 2008).By way of illustration, it is instructive to consider a classroom-based study conducted by Duff (2002) in a multilingual secondary school in Canada. Drawing on macro-level and micro-level contexts of communication in one content-level course, Duff found that the teacher’s attempts to foster respect for cultural diversity in the classroom had mixed results. In essence, the English language learners in the class were afraid of being criticized or laughed at because of their limited command of English. As Duff (p. 312) notes, ‘Silence protected them from humiliation’. This silence, however, was perceived by the native English speakers as representing ‘a lack of initiative, agency, or desire to improve one’s English or to offer interesting material for the sake of the class’ (2002, p. 312). It is clear from the classroom data, how-ever, that the English language learners in the class were not ‘unmotivated’; rather, it could be argued that they were not ‘invested’ in the language prac-tices of their classroom, where there were unequal power relations between the English language learners and native English speakers. Their investments were co-constructed in their interactions with their native speaker peers, and their identities a site of struggle.The construct of investment has sparked considerable interest in the field of applied linguistics and language education,6 including a special issue on the topic in the Journal of Asian Pacific Communication (Arkoudis & Davison, 2008). McKay and Wong (1996), for example, have drawn on this construct to explain the English language development of four Mandarin-speaking stu-dents in Grades 7 and 8 in a California school, noting that the needs, desires and negotiations of students were integral to their investment in the target language. Skilton-Sylvester (2002), drawing on her research with four Cambodian women in adult ESL classes in the USA, has argued that tradi-tional views of adult motivation and participation do not adequately address the complex lives of adult learners, and that an understanding of a woman’s domestic and professional identities is necessary to explain her investment in particular adult ESL programs. Haneda (2005) has drawn on the construct of investment to understand the engagement of two university students in an advanced Japanese literacy course, concluding that their multimember-ship in differing communities may have shaped the way they invested in writing in Japanese. Potowski (2007) uses the construct of investment to explain students’ use of Spanish in a dual Spanish/English immersion pro-gram in the USA, noting that even if a language program is well run, a learner’s investment in the target language must be consistent with the goals of the program if language learning is to meet expectations. In his work with immigrant students in a Singapore school, De Costa (2010a) used the notion of investment to investigate how a learner from China embraced standard Introduct ion 7English to inhabit an identity associated with being an academically able student. Cummins (2006) has drawn on the construct of investment to develop the notion of the identity text, arguing that the construct of invest-ment has emerged as a ‘significant explanatory construct’ (p. 59) in the second language learning literature.Imagined Communities and Imagined IdentitiesAn extension of interest in identity and investment concerns the imag-ined communities that language learners aspire to when they learn a lan-guage (Kanno & Norton, 2003; Norton, 2001; Pavlenko & Norton, 2007). Imagined communities refer to groups of people, not immediately tangible and accessible, with whom we connect through the power of the imagina-tion. In our daily lives we interact with many communities whose existence can be felt concretely and directly. These include our neighborhood commu-nities, our workplaces, our educational institutions and our religious groups. However, these are not the only communities with which we are affiliated. As Wenger (1998) suggests, direct involvement in community practices and concrete relationships – what he calls engagement – is not the only way in which we belong to a community; for Wenger, imagination is another impor-tant source of community. Imagined ties extend both spatially and tempo-rally. Benedict Anderson (1991), who first coined the term imagined communities, argues that what we think of as nations are imagined communi-ties, ‘because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion’ (p. 6). Thus, in imagining our-selves bonded with our fellow citizens across time and space, we can feel a sense of community with people we have not yet met, but perhaps hope to meet one day.A focus on imagined communities in language learning enables us to explore how learners’ affiliation with such communities might affect their learning trajectories. Such communities include future relationships that exist only in the learner’s imagination as well as affiliations – such as nation-hood or even transnational communities – that extend beyond local sets of relationships (Warriner, 2007). These imagined communities are no less real than the ones in which learners have daily engagement and might even have a stronger impact on their current actions and investment.The genesis of my thinking on imagined identities and imagined com- munities can be found in the stories of resistance shared with me by the language learners discussed in the first edition of this book. In that edition (p. 143), I describe how Mai, a young adult immigrant woman from Vietnam, grew increasingly unhappy with her English language class, and eventually withdrew from the course:8 Ident ity and Language LearningI was hoping that the course would help me the same as we learnt [in the six-month ESL course], but some night we only spend time on one man. He came from Europe. He talked about his country: what’s happening and what was happening. And all the time we didn’t learn at all. And tomor-row the other Indian man speak something for there. Maybe all week I didn’t write any more on my book.Although Mai was a highly motivated language learner, she had little invest-ment in the language practices of her classroom. While it could be argued that the teacher was attempting to incorporate the lived histories of the students into the classroom by inviting them to make public presentations about their native countries, what she appeared to do was to validate only one aspect of student identity – an essentialist, ethnic identity (European, Indian) – paying little attention to other sites of identity formation, such as gender, age and class. Further, the teacher appeared to focus primarily on the students’ historical past, rather than addressing the pressing demands of the present and the future, which, for Mai, included an investment in literacy practices.Insight into Mai’s hopes for the future, her imagined community and her imagined identity can be found in the following data taken from her diary on May 15, 1991:After work today when I was walking by myself on New Street then I met Karl who was go to the same school with me last course . . . I just told him about my job and the course I am taking. He said to me, ‘The good thing for you is to go to school then in the future you would have a job to work in the office.’ I hope so. But sometime I’m scared to dream about that.Mai worked in a clothes factory, and spent much time behind a sewing machine, dressed in regulation clothes and doing highly repetitive tasks. In the corner of the factory was a closed-in area, which served as ‘the office’. Here the employees wore fashionable clothes, worked at desks, and had easy access to phones and computers. Mai’s hope for the future was that she would become a member of this community: her imagined identity was that of the office worker who dressed smartly and was not lost in the anonymity of the factory floor. Mai knew she would need to speak and write English to be able to join this community. However, when her English class focused on the past lives of students, across diverse geographic communities, Mai strug-gled to make a connection between the language practices of the classroom and her imagined identity.Such issues have been taken up more extensively in publications such as Pavlenko and Norton (2007), and have been developed by scholars in the international community7 as well as a co-edited special issue of the Journal of Introduct ion 9Language, Identity, and Education on ‘Imagined communities and educational possibilities’ (Kanno & Norton, 2003). In the latter publication, a number of scholars have explored the imagined communities of learners in diverse regions of the world, following up this initial research in more recent publica-tions. In the Japanese context, for example, Kanno (2008) examined the rela-tionship between school education and inequality of access to bilingualism in five different Japanese schools promoting bilingual education. She found that while additive bilingualism was promoted for upper-middle-class stu-dents, subtractive bilingualism was far more common in schools serving immigrant and refugee children. Kanno argued that in the schools she researched, different visions of children’s imagined communities called for different forms of bilingual education, exacerbating existing inequities between students with unequal access to resources.In Canada, Dagenais et al. (2008) investigated the linguistic landscape in the vicinity of two elementary schools in Vancouver and Montreal, illustrat-ing the ways in which the children imagined the language of their neighbor-hoods, and constructed their identities in relation to them. Dagenais et al. described the innovative ways in which researchers and students drew on multimodal resources such as digital photography to document the linguistic landscape of these neighborhoods, and the way children in both cities were encouraged to exchange letters, posters, photographs and videos. Dagenais et al. argued that documenting the imagined communities of neighborhoods as seen by children can provide much information on the children’s under-standing of their community, which has important implications for identity and language learning.In another region of the world, Kendrick and Jones (2008) drew on the notion of imagined communities to analyze the drawings and photographs produced by primary and secondary schoolgirls in the Ugandan context. Their research, drawing on multimodal methodologies, sought to investigate the girls’ perceptions of participation in local literacy practices, and to pro-mote dialogue on literacy, women and development. What they found was that the girls’ visual images provided insight into their imagined communi-ties, which were associated with command of English and access to educa-tion. As they conclude (2008, p. 397):Providing opportunities for girls to explore and consider their worlds through alternative modes of communication and representation has immense potential as a pedagogical approach to cultivate dialogue about the nature of gender inequities, and serve as a catalyst for the positing of imagined communities where those inequities might not exist.Blackledge (2003) has linked the notion of imagined communities with racialization to investigate racial discourses embodied in educational docu-ments. He found that a monocultural and monolingual community, imagined 10 Ident ity and Language Learningby educational decision-makers as normative and natural, stigmatized the cultural practices of Asian minorities who made regular visits to their heri-tage countries. He argued that this normative imagined community valued homogeneity over diversity, and ‘positioned particular cultural practices as aberrant, “Other”, and damaging to the educational prospects of minority children’ (p. 332). In essence, he made the case that the normalizing dis-courses of the dominant group racialized the cultural practices of Asian groups by proposing a set of apparently common-sense arguments to under-mine them.Identity Categories and Language LearningWhile much research on identity and language learning explores the mul-tiple and intersecting dimensions of learners’ identities, there is a growing body of research that seeks to investigate the ways in which relations such as race, gender, class and sexual orientation may impact the language learn-ing process. Innovative research that addresses these issues does not regard such identity categories as ‘variables’ but rather as sets of relationships that are socially and historically constructed within particular relations of power. Interest in identity categories and language learning is gaining momentum. Special issues of the TESOL Quarterly on ‘Gender and language education’ (Davis & Skilton-Sylvester, 2004) and ‘Race and TESOL’ (Kubota & Lin, 2006) include insightful debates on gender, race and language learning, while recent monographs by Heller (2007), May (2008) and Rampton (2006) ensure that issues of language, ethnicity and class remain on the radar in the field. It is interesting to explore in greater detail the research that addresses language learning with respect to race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation.Many scholars see important connections between identity, race and eth-nicity (see Amin, 1997; Curtis & Romney, 2006; Lin et al., 2004; Luke, 2009), and there has been increasing interest in the relationship between race and language learning. Ibrahim’s (1999) research with a group of French-speaking continental African students in a Franco-Ontarian High School in Canada explores the impact on language learning of ‘becoming black’. He argues that the students’ linguistic styles, and in particular their use of Black Stylized English, was a direct outcome of being imagined and constructed as black by hegemonic discourses and groups.From a slightly different perspective, Taylor’s (2004) research in an anti-discrimination camp in Toronto argues for the need to understand language learning through the lens of what she calls ‘racialized gender’. The stories of Hue, a Vietnamese girl, and Khatra, a Somali girl, are particularly powerful in this regard, as Hue learns the multiple ways in which she is racialized in her school, and Khatra learns how her body signifies certain ethnic, racial Introduct ion 11and national identities. The experiences of Hue and Khatra support the view held by Kubota (2004) that a color-blind conception of multiculturalism does not do justice to the challenges faced by language learners of diverse races and ethnicities.The 2006 special issue of TESOL Quarterly (edited by Kubota & Lin) offered several articles investigating the relationship between race and lan-guage learning, and all authors made the case that TESOL practitioners need to critically examine how our ideas about race and racial identities influence what we teach, how we teach and how we see our students. As Kubota and Lin (2006) observed, ‘[Although] the field of teaching English to speakers of other languages (TESOL) brings people from various racialized backgrounds together . . . the field of TESOL has not sufficiently addressed the issue of race and related concepts’ (p. 471). Motha (2006) supported Kubota and Lin’s assertion that race is central in language teaching, and examined how four American teachers attempted to create anti-racist pedagogies, showing what complexities such a commitment involved. For example, the Korean American teacher (the only teacher of color among the research subjects) described her belief that her legitimacy as a professional was judged inade-quate by colleagues, and that this contributed to her feelings of inequality within her professional context. Shuck (2006) explicitly examined how public discourse in the United States links language with race as a way of positioning groups. In interviews with white undergraduates who speak English as a first language at a southwestern USA university, Shuck found that non-native speakers with non-European origins were seen by the stu-dents as incomprehensible, intellectually lesser, and responsible for their ‘non-integration’ in American society. In particular, she found the onus was always on the non-native speaker, not the white student, to create comprehensibility.With regard to intersections of gender and language learning, the work of scholars such as Cameron (2006), Gordon (2004), Higgins (2010), Pavlenko et al. (2001) and Sunderland (2004) is particularly insightful. Their concep-tion of gender, which extends beyond female–male divides, is understood to be a system of social relationships and discursive practices that may lead to systemic inequality among particular groups of learners, including women, minorities, elderly and disabled. Pavlenko, for example, like Taylor (2004), argues for the need to understand the intersections between gender and other forms of oppression, noting that both girls and boys who are silenced in the language classroom are more likely those from the working class. A number of these issues are taken up in Norton and Pavlenko (2004), who document research from diverse regions of the world that addresses the rela-tionship between gender and language learning with respect to the domi-nance of the English language internationally.After decades of silence, the work of scholars such as King (2008), Moffatt and Norton (2008) and Nelson (2009) explores the extent to which 12 Ident ity and Language Learningsexual orientation might be an important identity category in the language classroom. Of central interest is the way in which a teacher can create a sup-portive environment for learners who might be gay, lesbian or transgendered. Nelson contrasts a pedagogy of inquiry, which asks how linguistic and cul-tural practices naturalize certain sexual identities, most notably heterosexu-ality, with a pedagogy of inclusion which aims to introduce images as well as experiences of gays and lesbians into curriculum materials. Nelson’s approach can fruitfully be applied to other issues of marginalization, helping learners to question normative practices in the target culture into which they have entered.Methods and Analysis of ResearchWithin reference to the identity approach to language learning, the key methodological question to be answered is: What kind of research enables scholars to investigate the relationship between language learners as social beings and the frequently inequitable worlds in which learning takes place (Norton & McKinney, 2011)? Since the identity approach to language learn-ing characterizes learner identity as multiple and changing, a quantitative research paradigm relying on static and measurable variables will generally not be appropriate. The focus on issues of power also necessitates that quali-tative research designs are framed by critical research. For these reasons, methods that scholars use in identity approaches to language learning tend to be qualitative rather than quantitative, and often draw on critical ethnog-raphy, feminist poststructuralist theory, sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology.Most recently, there is increasing interest in the identity of the researcher with respect to research participants, given that much identity research takes the position that claims to ‘objectivity’ (whether qualitative or quantitative) are often suspect. In this view, researchers have to under-stand their own experience and knowledge as well as those of the partici-pants in their studies. This does not suggest that identity research is lacking in rigor; on the contrary, all research studies are understood to be ‘situated’, and the researcher integral to the progress of a research project. In her research in India, Ramanathan (2005, p. 15) notes, for example, ‘Questions and issues of what are “present” and “absent” clearly underlie what are “visible” and “invisible” in literacy events and practices and are determined, to a large extent, by the researcher’s lens.’ In our research in Uganda, Margaret Early and I (Norton & Early, 2011) explore researcher identity with respect to teacher education in a poorly resourced rural com-munity. We found that we regularly sought to reduce power differentials between ourselves and our participants by adopting a range of identities such as ‘international guest’, ‘collaborative team member’, ‘teacher’ and Introduct ion 13‘teacher educator’. Crucially, this need to exercise and report on researcher reflexivity is consistent with similar calls for a more transparent approach to working with language learners (see Kramsch & Whiteside, 2007; Tremmel & De Costa, 2011) and language teachers (Crookes, 2009; Kumaravadivelu, 2012).Identity researchers frequently seek to better understand how power operates within society, constraining or enabling human action. They often draw on Fairclough (2001) and Foucault (1980) to understand not only the relationship between knowledge and power but also the subtle ways in which power operates in society. Foucault notes, for example, that power is often invisible in that it frequently naturalizes events and practices in ways that come to be seen as ‘normal’ to members of a community. As Pennycook (2007, p. 39) notes:Foucault brings a constant scepticism towards cherished concepts and modes of thought. Taken-for-granted categories such as man, woman, class, race, ethnicity, nation, identity, awareness, emancipation, lan-guage or power must be understood as contingent, shifting and pro-duced in the particular, rather than having some prior ontological status.In an identity approach to language learning, there has been a strong meth-odological focus on narratives, whether collected through fieldwork (Barkhuizen, 2008; Block, 2006; Early & Norton, in press; Goldstein, 1996; McKay & Wong, 1996; Miller, 2003) or from existing autobiographical and biographical accounts (Kramsch, 2009; Pavlenko, 2001a, 2001b). This meth-odological focus has many potential synergies with a critical research para-digm in that it foregrounds an individual’s sense-making of their experience as well as the complexity of individual/social relationships. As Block (2007a) has pointed out, the focus on narrative in SLA research follows its recent popularity in social science research, and is part of a wider ‘social turn’ (Block, 2003) in SLA research. Pavlenko (2001b) makes a strong case for the particular contribution that narrative can make:L2 learning stories . . . are unique and rich sources of information about the relationship between language and identity in second lan-guage learning and socialization. It is possible that only personal nar-ratives provide a glimpse into areas so private, personal and intimate that they are rarely – if ever – breached in the study of SLA, and at the same time are at the heart and soul of the second language socialization process. (p. 167)In fieldwork-based research on identity and language learning, researchers often combine a range of methods of data collection such as ethnographic 14 Ident ity and Language Learningobservation, interviews (including life history interviews), diary studies and written responses (narrative or other) to researcher questions. Autoethnographies (e.g. Canagarajah, 2012) also have much potential for exploring identity development. Extended time frames provide particular depth. For example, Toohey’s (2000, 2001) longitudinal study of six young learners from minority language backgrounds in a Canadian school tracked their development over a three-year period. Toohey combined several eth-nographic data collection methods: regular classroom observation captured in field notes and audio recordings and supported by monthly video record-ings; interviews and ongoing informal discussions with the children’s teachers; and home visits where parents were interviewed. It was the com-bination of such methods that provided the rich data necessary to under-stand the learners and their classroom language learning as socially, historically and politically constructed, and the classroom as a site of iden-tity negotiation.Indeed, while using a combination of data collection tools as illustrated in Toohey (2000, 2001) is not uncommon, much identity work has also focused on a smaller variety of data sets. While some researchers focus on interaction data (e.g. Bucholtz & Hall, 2005), others have adopted a corpus approach to investigate how identities are represented in written discourse (e.g. De Costa, 2007; Hyland, 2012); others still have used critical discourse analytic tools to explore the ways in which identities are depicted in the media (e.g. Omoniyi, 2011). Omoniyi (2011), for example, analyzed two newspapers to examine how minority identity was depicted in the British media. Hence, in addition to taking into consideration the types of data sets for exploring identity, identity researchers have developed new ways to facili-tate this investigative process. Gee (2012), for instance, has designed a set of theoretical tools of inquiry – situated meanings, social languages, figured worlds and Discourses – in order to, as he puts it, ‘move us from the ground of specific uses of language in specific contexts . . . up to the world of identi-ties’ (p. 43). Working with narratives, Block (2010) has suggested three dis-tinct ways of dealing with narratives: thematic analysis (i.e. focus on the content of what is said), structural analysis (i.e. focus on how narratives are produced) and dialogic/performative analysis (i.e. focus on the ‘who’ the utterance is directed to and the purpose of the utterance). This third analytic approach underscores the need to take into account the positionings adopted by the interlocutor, thereby allowing for a more rigorous analysis of narratives.Qualitative research on language and identity is not without its chal-lenges, however, and the following two studies are illustrative of some of its difficulties. Drawing on their research on task-based language learning in urban settings in the United Kingdom, Leung et al. (2004) examine the inelegance of qualitative research, arguing that the ‘epistemic turbulence’ in qualitative research in second language acquisition centers on the Introduct ion 15 question of what constitutes or represents reality. The methodology adopted in their study was to collect naturally occurring data with the use of video and audio recordings, which were supplemented by field notes. They describe the data as ‘messy’ in that it was difficult to represent and account for data that did not fit neatly into the theoretical construct of task-based language use. Leung et al. make the case that researchers need a conceptual framework that acknowledges rather than obscures the mess-iness of data. In other words, and as noted earlier, identity researchers need to adopt a transparent approach when sharing the findings of their work.In a very different context, Toohey and Waterstone (2004) describe a research collaboration between teachers and researchers in Vancouver, Canada, with the mutual goal of investigating what practices in classrooms would make a difference to the learning opportunities of minority-language children. While teachers were comfortable discussing and critiquing their educational practices, they expressed ambivalence about translating their practice into publishable academic papers, noting that they felt little ownership over the academic language characteristic of many published jour-nals. To address precisely this type of challenge, Sharkey and Johnson (2003), as well as Denos et al. (2009), have initiated a productive and engaging dia-logue between researchers and teachers, with the express aim of demystify-ing research and theory that address themes of identity, power and educational change.Identity and Language TeachingI now turn to the relevance of theories of identity and language learning for classroom teaching, a subject that I began to address in the first edition of Identity and Language Learning. McKinney and Norton (2008) have argued that responding to diversity in the language classroom requires an imagina-tive assessment of what is possible as well as a critical assessment of what is desirable. Clearly, the assessment of what is ‘possible’ requires ongoing inter-action between teachers, administrators and policy-makers, with reference to larger material conditions that can serve to constrain or enable the range of identity positions available to students (see Gunderson, 2007; Luke, 2004a). If we agree that diverse identity positions offer learners a range of positions from which to speak, listen, read or write, the challenge for language educa-tors is to explore which identity positions offer the greatest opportunity for social engagement and interaction. Conversely, if there are identity positions that silence students, then teachers need to investigate and address these marginalizing practices. I will develop this topic of identity and language teaching with reference to global perspectives, digital innovations and class-room resistance.16 Ident ity and Language LearningGlobal perspectivesA number of recent research projects, drawn from diverse regions of the world, are illustrative of the ways in which particular pedagogical practices in language classrooms can either constrain or enable students in their re-imagining of possibilities for both the present and the future. As Lee’s (2008) research in a Canadian post-secondary institution suggests, while many lan-guage teachers strive to enhance the range of possible futures available to their students, there is often a disjuncture between the pedagogy as it is conceptualized by the teacher and the practices adopted in the classroom. Despite the best intentions, classroom practices can recreate subordinate stu-dent identities, thereby limiting students’ access not only to language learn-ing opportunities but also to other more powerful identities.Lee’s findings are consistent with those of Ramanathan (2005), who, in a different part of the world, found that teachers’ language practices can reinforce existing inequities among diverse learners of English. In the Indian context, Ramanathan (2005) investigated how students who had been socialized into either Gujarati or English-medium schools through grades K–12 adjusted to English in English-medium tertiary level institutions. What she found was that students who received English-medium instruction through high school were better prepared to succeed in English-medium col-leges than those schooled in the vernacular. The English curriculum for the students educated in the English medium tended to focus on the creative analysis of English literature, while the English curriculum for the ver- nacular students, who were mostly lower-caste Dalit students, made exten-sive use of grammar and translation. What Ramanathan’s research suggests is that pedagogical language practices that are ritualized and allow for little meaning-making on the part of students may limit the learner’s language learning progress and access to more powerful identities.Projects with more promising outcomes took place in Mexico, China, South Africa, Uganda and the United Kingdom. In these classrooms, and in many other transformative classrooms that have been discussed in the litera-ture (see for example the multiple projects discussed in Norton & Toohey, 2004), the language teachers’ conceptions of ‘language’ and thus ‘language teaching’ are broad in scope. The teachers conceive of language not only as a linguistic system but also as a social practice in which experiences are orga-nized and identities negotiated. There is recognition that if learners are not invested in the language practices of the classroom, learning outcomes are limited and educational inequities perpetuated. Further, such teachers take great care to offer learners multiple identity positions from which to engage in the language practices of the classroom, the school and the community. In diverse regions of the world, innovative language teachers are seeking to pro-vide learners with a range of opportunities to take ownership over meaning-making, and to re-imagine an expanded set of identities for the future.Introduct ion 17In Mexico, Clemente and Higgins (2008) drew on their longitudinal study of pre-service English teachers in Oaxaca to raise questions about the dominant role that English plays in the globalized political economy, and to illustrate the ways in which the non-native English teachers in their study sought to appropriate and ‘perform’ English without sacrificing local identi-ties. Defining their research site as a ‘contact zone’, they describe the way the student teachers confronted the demands of English through various forms of language play in both English and Spanish, making the case that the student teacher groups were safe havens in which participants could play with both languages. Such performances allowed them to explore various identity positions, as a counter-discourse to dominant discourses on the native English teacher. As one student teacher said (2008, p. 123):I have a Mexican accent. English is mine from the very moment I put it into practice and I am able to establish communication. But when I say that the English language is mine, I do not mean to say that I want to take the culture that comes with it.In China, drawing on Norton’s (2000) notion of imagined communi-ties, Xu (2012) examined how the imagined identities of four ESOL K–12 teachers were transformed during their early years of teaching. Coining the term practiced identities, she illustrated how the practiced identities of three of her case participants differed substantially from their initial imagined identi-ties, a consequence of a reality check once they started teaching. Only the fourth case teacher, through perseverance and agency, was able to extend the imagined learning facilitator identity that she had conceived at the start of her career.In South Africa, Stein (2008) explored the way in which English lan-guage classrooms in under-resourced township schools became transforma-tive sites in which textual, cultural and linguistic forms were re-appropriated and ‘re-sourced’, with a view to validating those practices that had been marginalized and undervalued by the apartheid system. This transformation took place as teachers provided opportunities for English language learners to make use of multimodal resources, including linguistic, bodily and sen-sory modes, in order to engage in meaning-making. Stein’s learners embraced the opportunities they were given to produce multimodal counter-texts that subverted the canon, and to draw on topics sometimes considered taboo.In a similar spirit, recent research in Uganda investigated the extent to which multimodal pedagogies that include drawing, photography and drama can be incorporated more systematically into the English curriculum (Kendrick et al., 2006; Kendrick & Jones, 2008). Drawing on research in two regions of the country, Kendrick and her colleagues argue that multimodal pedagogies offer teachers innovative ways of validating students’ literacies, experiences and cultures, and are highly effective in supporting English 18 Ident ity and Language Learning language learning in the classroom. In the photography project, for example, the students’ perception of English as being a somewhat restrictive and arti-ficial medium of instruction diminished as English began to be used for com-munication, expression and ownership of meaning.In the United Kingdom, Wallace (2003) has worked with adult language learners on critical reading courses that address the socially embedded nature of the reading process, exploring text-focused activities that address how meaning and power are encoded in texts. In doing so, she makes use of a range of popular texts, including newspaper articles, magazine articles and advertisements. Wallace contrasts her approach with dominant English Foreign Language methodologies such as communicative language teaching and task-based learning, arguing that such approaches can be ‘domesticating’ for learners, teaching them only how to fit in with dominant cultures rather than to question and reshape powerful discourses.Digital technology, identity and language learningThe affordances of digital technology have been investigated by a number of scholars interested in language and identity.8 Lam (2000, 2006), for example, found that immigrant youth in the United States were fashion-ing identities for themselves in computer-mediated transnational networks as multilingual, multicompetent actors. In so doing, they were able to pro-vide for themselves new language learning opportunities that seemed denied to them in their school in which they were stigmatized as immigrants and incompetent language users. In another part of the world, White (2007) examined two distance language teaching programs in Australia, both of which were responding to the need for a wider range of foreign languages in schools. She concluded that as innovations in distance learning and teaching expand, it is imperative that the field find ways of addressing the philo-sophical, pedagogical and professional issues that arise, and that issues of identity, for both teachers and learners, are significant factors in each of these domains.Lewis and Fabos (2005) examined the functions of Instant Messaging (IM) among seven youths to see how their social identities shaped and were shaped by this form of digital literacy. They found that the youths engaged in IM to enhance their social relationships and statuses across contexts, sometimes assuming alternative identities online. They noted that IM per-mitted these youths to engage in literacy practices in ways they were not able to do in school and that schools must take into account these new forms of literacy. The research of Kramsch and Thorne (2002) indicated, however, that not all internet communication leads to positive identity outcomes. In their study of the synchronous and asynchronous communication between American learners of French in the USA and French learners of English in France, they found that students had little understanding of the larger Introduct ion 19 cultural framework within which each party was operating, leading to prob-lematic digital exchanges.In Canada, Jim Cummins and Margaret Early have been working on a digital project that seeks to provide a range of identity options for learners in multilingual schools in Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal. Working with more than 50 teachers, four schoolboards, a teacher’s union and non- government literacy organizations, this Multi Literacy Project (www.multiliteracies.ca) seeks to understand the literacy practices of students in and outside of school, to explore innovative classrooms in which teachers engage in multiliterate practices, and to investigate how educational systems influence the multiliteracy practices of schools. The project website provides a workspace for students, teachers and researchers to assemble and organize annotated galleries, construct demonstration classroom projects, and create case studies on what Cummins (2006) and Cummins and Early (2011) have called the ‘identity texts’ produced by these students.In Uganda, Norton and Williams (2012) draw on their research on the digital portable library, eGranary, undertaken in a rural village in 2008, to investigate the uptake of eGranary by secondary students in the community. Drawing on Blommaert’s (2010) construct of scale, they illustrate how both space and time were implicated in the diverse practices associated with eGra-nary, and their indexical meanings in the wider community. In addition, with reference to Norton’s (2000) work on identity and investment, they illustrate how students’ identities shifted over time from trainee to tutor, and how the use of eGranary enhanced what was socially imaginable to the library scholars. The construct of investment thus served as a useful comple-ment to Blommaert’s construct of scale.Most of the studies that investigate how digital technologies affect identity and language learning have been commendatory, with the following comment by Lam (2006) representative of current thinking: ‘Networked electronic com-munications have given rise to new social spaces, linguistic and semiotic prac-tices, and ways of fashioning the self beyond the national context for immigrant youths in the United States’ (p. 171). However, she also cautioned that these technologies may not provide the analytical tools necessary to empower youths to critique and change existing social structures. It may be that mentoring is a crucial element in supporting learner use of multimodality for critical purposes (Hull, 2007). However, to ensure analytical rigor, identity researchers will also need to adopt more sophisticated analytical tools (see Baldry & Thibault, 2006; Blommaert, 2010; Hornberger, 2003; Martinec & van Leeuwen, 2009) in order to better understand how identities are mediated along multimodal lines. Further, as scholars such as Andema (2009), Snyder and Prinsloo (2007) and Warschauer (2003) note, much of the digital research on language learning has focused on research in wealthier regions of the world, and there is a great need for research in poorly resourced communities to impact global debates on new technologies, identity and language learning.20 Ident ity and Language LearningIdentity and resistanceThe relationship between identity, language learning and classroom resistance has become a compelling and fruitful area of research in language education. While larger structural constraints and classroom practices might position learners in undesirable ways, learners, with human agency, can resist these positions in innovative and unexpected ways, as the following three examples illustrate. In exploring what he calls the subversive identities of language learners, Canagarajah (2004a) addresses the intriguing question of how language learners can maintain membership of their vernacular communities and cultures while still learning a second language or dialect. He draws on his research with two very different groups, one in the USA and the other in Sri Lanka, to argue that language learners are sometimes ambivalent about the learning of a second language or dialect, and that they may resort to clandestine literacy practices to create ‘pedagogical safe houses’ in the language classroom. In both contexts, the clandestine liter-acy activities of the students are seen to be forms of resistance to unfavor-able identities imposed on the learners. At the same time, however, these safe houses serve as sites of identity construction, allowing students to negotiate the often contradictory tensions they encounter as members of diverse communities.A second example of resistance is found in the work of McKinney and van Pletzen (2004). Working with relatively privileged students at a histori-cally white and Afrikaans university in South Africa, McKinney and van Pletzen introduced critical reading into their first year English studies course using two curriculum units on South African literature. In exploring repre-sentations of the apartheid past, McKinney and van Pletzen encountered significant resistance from students to the ways in which they felt uncom-fortably positioned by the curriculum materials on offer. McKinney and van Pletzen attempted to create discursive spaces in which both they and the students could explore the many private and political processes through which identities are constructed. In doing so, they re-conceptualized stu-dents’ resistance more productively as a meaning-making activity which offers powerful teaching moments.The third example of identity and resistance is drawn from Talmy (2008), who investigated the multiple ways in which English language learners in a Hawai’i high school resisted being positioned as an ‘ESL stu-dent’ in their dedicated-ESL classes. While the school-sanctioned ESL stu-dent was expected to bring required materials to class, read assigned fiction, do book work, meet assigned dates, follow instructions and work for the full class session, resistant ESL students engaged in a wide variety of oppo-sitional activities, including leaving materials ‘at home’, talking with friends and playing cards. From a pedagogical point of view, two of Talmy’s observations are particularly significant. The first observation is that the Introduct ion 21ESL teachers began to change their practices in response to the resistance of their students, necessitating a shift in teacher identity; the second is that the students’ actions paradoxically turned the ESL program into precisely what the students disliked most, ‘an easy, academically inconsequential program that did little to meet their L2 learning or educational needs’ (2008, p. 639).Emerging Themes and Future DirectionsIt is clear from the discussion above that ‘identity’ has indeed become a research area in its own right, and is stimulating many researchers and much debate in the field of language learning and teaching. Increasingly, the field is being informed in diverse ways by work in anthropology, sociology, post-colonial and cultural studies, and education. The researcher who investigates identity and language education in the future will need to be comfortable with this interdisciplinarity (Gao, 2007), and as scholars such as Luke (2004b) and Morgan and Ramanathan (2005) have remarked, need to understand that learners live in globalized and cosmopolitan sociocultural worlds. Current language education scholars have seen a static view of language as system and learning as internalization of system as an inadequate representation of dynamic and complex processes. What has remained of interest is the notion of complex and embodied language learners living in socially stratified worlds that constrain as well as enable the exercise of human agency. The goal for future research on identity and language learning is to contribute to efforts to promote language learning and teaching in ways that can enhance human agency in more equitable worlds.In this spirit, researchers such as Jenkins (2007) and De Costa (2012) have started to examine how non-native language learners develop and enact identities from an English as a lingua franca (ELF) perspective, an innovative extension of earlier debates on who owns English in the international com-munity (Norton, 1997; Pennycook, 1998; Phillipson, 2009). Closely related to this interest in non-native speaker identities has been a growing volume of research on the identities of heritage language learners (see Abdi, 2011; Blackledge & Creese, 2008; Duff, 2012; He, 2006). This emergent interest can be attributed in part to a larger agenda to reject the essentialization of iden-tity categories. As identity research has illustrated, static categorizations need to be interrogated in the face of globalization (Alim et al., 2008; Higgins, 2011; Lo Bianco et al., 2009), as well as growing multilingualism in schools and society (see Blackledge & Creese, 2010; Kramsch, 2009; Shin, 2012; Weber & Horner, 2012).In this regard, an understanding of language learning processes focused on identity would be greatly enriched by research conducted in postcolonial sites where multilingualism is the norm and language acquisition processes 22 Ident ity and Language Learningcan be quite different from immigrant language learning experiences in the Western countries or study abroad contexts.9 In an article that challenges monolingualist assumptions underlying much of SLA theory, Canagarajah (2007, p. 935) argues that ‘insights from non-Western communities should inform the current efforts for alternate theory building in our field’. In such multilingual contexts it is unlikely that the term SLA itself is appropriate. As Block (2003, p. 5) has noted, the term ‘second’ doesn’t capture the ‘experi-ences of multilinguals who have had contact with three or more languages in their lifetimes’. Indeed, as Kramsch and Whiteside (2008, p. 664) argue, the growth of multilingualism has led to what they have called the develop-ment of ‘symbolic competence’:Social actors in multilingual settings seem to activate more than a com-municative competence that would enable them to communicate accu-rately, effectively, and appropriately with one another. They seem to display a particularly acute ability to play with various linguistic codes and with the various spatial and temporal resonances of these codes. We call this competence ‘symbolic competence’.By way of example, South African multilingual contexts have much to con- tribute to our thinking on processes of identification and language learning (e.g. Makubalo, 2007; McKinney, 2007; Nongogo, 2007). McKinney’s (2007) study of the language practices of black South African students attending previously white high schools shows the complex self and other positioning of black youth in relation to different ‘brands’ of English as well as to the use of local African languages. In a country with eleven official languages, but where English is the language of power, one learner referred to the prestige variety of English as ‘Louis Vuitton English’, illustrating the idea of English as a commodity (McKinney, 2007, p. 14). Despite the accusations aimed at these black students who are acquiring a prestige variety of English as ‘becoming white’, or the use of derogatory labels such as ‘coconuts’, such students resisted this positioning and showed their awareness of the differ-ent kinds of cultural capital carried by varieties of English and local lan-guages. They were clearly appropriating English for their own uses rather than identifying with white first language speakers of English in their lan-guage acquisition processes.In a similar spirit, Morgan and Ramanathan (2005) argue persuasively that the field of language education needs to consider ways in which English language teaching can be decolonized, proposing that there is a need to decenter the authority that Western interests have in the language teaching industry. To this end, there is a need to restore agency and professionalism in periphery communities (Canagarajah, 2002, 2007; Higgins, 2009; Kumaravadivelu, 2003; Tembe & Norton, 2008), and give due recognition to local vernacular modes of learning and teaching (Canagarajah, 2004b). There Introduct ion 23has been some progress on this front. Special issues of a number of journals are significant, including: special issues of the TESOL Quarterly on Language in Development (Markee, 2002) and Language Policies and TESOL (Ramanathan & Morgan, 2007); and two recent issues of the AILA Review of the International Association of Applied Linguistics (AILA) on ‘Africa and Applied Linguistics’ (Makoni & Meinhof, 2003) and ‘World Applied Linguistics’ (Gass & Makoni, 2004).Another way to promote more equitable language learning and teaching is to explore the relatively under-researched identity of class. Much identity work has drawn on Bourdieu’s (1991) constructs of capital and habitus (see Albright & Luke, 2007; De Costa, 2010c; Heller, 2008; Lam & Warriner, 2012; Lin, 2007; Norton, 2000); however, an explicit discussion of class in identity research is less common. This has prompted Block’s (2012) exhortation for language researchers to make connection between class and SLA. Further, an explicit discussion of class has become vitally relevant in light of prevailing neoliberal discourses of consumerism, entrepreneurship and economic com-petitiveness – all of which have directly impacted how languages are learned and taught both inside and outside the classroom (see Block et al., 2012; Heller, 2011; Kramsch, 2006; Morgan & Clarke, 2011).With regard to other future directions in the field of identity and lan-guage learning, one area that is receiving increasing attention is that of the language teacher and the language teacher educator.10 By invoking Lave’s (1996) notions of learning-in-practice and identities-in-practice, Kanno and Stuart (2011), for example, traced how two beginning teachers in the USA, enrolled in a practicum course, ultimately developed professional identities. Kanno and Stuart conclude that an enhanced understanding of teacher iden-tity development needs to be included in the knowledge base of second language teacher education. From a teacher educator perspective, Pennycook (2004), in Sydney, Australia, reflects on his experience of observing a teacher in a TESOL practicum. In a compelling narrative, he reminds us that a great deal of language teaching does not take place in well-funded institutes of education, but in community programs, places of worship and immigrant centers, where funds are limited and time is at a premium. Of central inter-est is a consideration of the way in which teacher educators can intervene in the process of practicum observation to bring about educational and social change. To this end, Pennycook argues that ‘critical moments’ in the practicum can be used to raise larger questions of power and authority in the wider society, and provide an opportunity for critical discussion and reflection.Researchers of language and identity have also become interested not only in the conditions under which language learners speak but in the extent to which identities and investments structure their engagement with texts, whether these be written, oral or multimodal. There is growing recognition that when a learner engages in textual practices, both the comprehension 24 Ident ity and Language Learningand the construction of the text are mediated by the learner’s investment in the activity and the learner’s identity. Many scholars11 have engaged in research on the relationship between literacy and learner identity, and this interest is likely to continue in the future.With regard to other future directions on identity and language learning, there is scope for expanding the methodological tools used. Wagner (2004) and Block (2007a) have recently commented on the potential of the analysis of naturally occurring interaction to enrich research in the area of identity in SLA, particularly in exploring the negotiation of participation. As a method-ological tool, Conversation Analysis (CA) enables researchers to explore dis-course identities (Zimmerman, 1998) and social identities, thereby enhancing our understanding of how identities are ascribed through an analysis of the sequential development of talk. While there are several identity-focused analyses of second language classroom talk (e.g. Duff, 2002; Pomerantz, 2008; Talmy, 2008; Toohey, 2000), analyses of talk outside the classroom are less common. On a broader level, future identity work needs to conceptualize talk as discursive practice, in light of the practice turn in applied linguistics (see De Costa, 2010b; Pennycook, 2010, 2012; Young, 2009). Related to this turn has been an exploration of identity in conjunction with ideology (e.g. De Costa, 2010a, 2011, 2012), style (e.g. Stroud & Wee, 2012) and stance (e.g. Jaffe, 2009). This interest in ideology, style and stance will likely be devel-oped further and applied to a variety of learning and teaching contexts to advance an already vibrant identity research agenda.Finally, identity research will be enhanced by the conduct of more long- itudinal work. While earlier work involving immigrant learners such as reported in Norton (2000) and Toohey (2000) took into account identity development over space and time, future work will benefit from a more nuanced spatio-temporal understanding of how learner identities evolve through a scalar lens. Lemke (2008), for example, has called for the notion of identity to be more scale differentiated, arguing that identities on all scales shape and are shaped by desires and fears rooted in human embodiedness. Echoing a similar sentiment, Wortham (2008) proposes greater attention to the level of practice, which entails studying when and where identities are made locally. This, he suggests, should be done by examining critical points in activities engaged across space and time scales. This scalar approach to examining identity has been used by sociolinguists who work in domains outside of the classroom (e.g. Blommaert, 2010; Budach, 2009; Dong & Blommaert, 2009). However, this scalar perspective will likely find larger purchase in future education-related identity work.The wide range of research on identity and language learning and the emerging areas of research in this regard suggest that interest in identity and language learning will remain vibrant in the future. The first edition of Identity and Language Learning anticipated only some of the research that has been undertaken since 2000. However, the constructs of investment, imagined Introduct ion 25communities and imagined identities have proved resilient over the years. It is timely then to revisit these ideas in Chapters 1 to 7 that follow. The com-pelling Afterword by Claire Kramsch provides a complementary perspective to issues of identity in the field, and locates my work within an historical context. I look forward to engaging in further debate and collaborative research on the topic of identity and language learning with both established and emerging scholars in the coming years.Structure of the BookIn Chapter 1, I argue that, since practice in the target language is centrally important in the learning of a second language, SLA theorists and second language teachers need to understand how opportunities to practice speaking are socially structured in both formal and informal sites of language learning. Furthermore, it is important for theorists and teachers to understand how language learners respond to and create opportunities to speak the target language, and how their actions intersect with their investment in the target language and their changing identities. Research which addresses these issues will be of benefit to language teachers who wish to meet the needs of learners like Saliha (see page 41). If learners do not make progress in learning, teachers cannot assume that learners do not wish to learn the second language or that they are unmotivated or inflexible; perhaps the learners are struggling because they cannot speak under conditions of marginalization.In Chapter 2, I address the complex relationship between the methodo- logy and the theory of my study. I argue that any approach to methodology presupposes a set of assumptions that guides the questions that are asked in a research project and how these questions are addressed. Furthermore, I suggest that how data is collected will inevitably influence what data is col-lected and what conclusions are drawn on the basis of data analysis. I describe the theory that informed my approach to methodology, and then describe the methodology that I used in the light of this theory, focusing on the diary study as particularly important in the data collection process.In Chapter 3, I locate my study in the context of other studies of immi-grant language learners in both Canada and the international community. I then introduce the five participants in the study: Eva from Poland, Mai from Vietnam, Katarina from Poland, Martina from the former Czechoslovakia and Felicia from Peru.12 I comment on their exposure to English and their practice of English, and describe the conditions under which they feel most comfortable speaking English. I draw attention to the contradictory position in which these women find themselves in relation to anglophone Canadians: They need access to anglophone social networks in order to practice English in the wider community, but knowledge of English is an a priori condition of entry into these social networks.26 Ident ity and Language LearningIn Chapter 4, I describe the language learning experiences of the two younger women in the study, Eva and Mai. I argue that each woman’s invest-ment in English must be understood with reference to her reasons for coming to Canada, her plans for the future and her changing identity. I describe Eva as a multicultural citizen in that, over time, she gained access to the anglo-phone social networks at work and described herself as having the same possibilities as Canadians. With respect to Mai, I demonstrate that she took on the position of language broker in the home to enable her to resist the patriarchal structures in her extended family. I also examine how and why Mai’s workplace offered opportunities for Mai to practice English, and how changes in the language practices in the workplace represented a threat to her investment in English, her opportunities to practice English and her iden-tity as a language broker in the home.In Chapter 5, I describe the language learning experiences of the three older women in the study, Katarina, Martina and Felicia, indicating how their investment in English intersects with their identities as mothers. Katarina’s ambivalent relationship to English is described in depth: On the one hand, she feared that English would undermine her relationship to her only child; on the other hand, it would give her access to the fellow profes-sionals with whom she would most like to interact. Martina, on the other hand, as the primary caregiver in the home, needed to speak English in order to relieve her children of the responsibility of defending the family’s interests in the larger social world. Despite her sense that her immigrant status afforded her little social value, she was not silenced by marginalization. Felicia’s investment in her identity as a wealthy Peruvian is intriguing, and her resistance to being positioned as an immigrant in Canada is addressed.In Chapter 6, I address the implications of my findings for second lan-guage acquisition theory. With reference to data from my study, I critique current SLA theory on natural language learning, the acculturation model of SLA and the affective filter hypothesis respectively. I argue that SLA theo-rists need to address the inequitable relations of power which structure opportunities for language learners to practice the target outside the class-room. I demonstrate that the acculturation model of SLA does not give suf-ficient recognition to situations of additive and subtractive bilingualism, and I suggest that a learner’s affective filter needs to be theorized as a social construction which intersects in significant ways with a language learner’s identity. I suggest that a poststructuralist conception of identity and Bourdieu’s (1977) notion of legitimate discourse are theoretically useful in help-ing to explain the findings from my study, and are a valuable contribution to SLA theory. In the final section of the chapter, drawing on Lave and Wenger’s (1991) conceptions of situated learning, I incorporate these ideas into an expanded notion of language learning as a social practice.In Chapter 7, I consider the implications of my study for classroom prac-tice. I examine the expectations the participants had of formal language Introduct ion 27classes and analyze these expectations in view of findings from the study on natural language learning and identity. I suggest that my study has a number of implications for classroom practice, defending my arguments with refer-ence to two stories of classroom resistance described by Katarina and Felicia. However, with reference to Mai’s story of a particularly problematic class-room experience, I raise questions about how student experience should be incorporated into the language curriculum. I then take the position that the diary study itself was a pedagogical practice that had the potential to expand and transform language learning possibilities both inside and outside the classroom. Finally, noting the limitations of the diary study, I suggest that classroom-based social research might help to bridge the gap between formal and natural sites of language learning for immigrant language learners, giving them the more powerful identity of ethnographer in relation to the larger world of target language speakers.Notes (1) See for example volumes by Atkinson, 2011; Block, 2003, 2007b; Caldas-Coulthard & Iedema, 2008; Clark, 2009; Cummins, 2001; Day, 2002; Heller, 2007; Higgins, 2009; Kanno, 2003, 2008; Kramsch, 2009; Kubota & Lin, 2009; Lin, 2007; Mantero, 2007; Menard-Warwick, 2009; Miller, 2003; Nelson, 2009; Norton, 1997; 2000; Norton & Toohey, 2004; Pavlenko & Blackledge, 2004; Potowski, 2007; Toohey, 2000; Tsui & Tollefson, 2007. (2) See for example Block, 2010; Morgan & Clarke, 2011; Norton, 2006, 2010; Norton & McKinney, 2011; Norton & Toohey, 2002; Ricento, 2005. (3) Anya, 2011; Cornwell, 2005; Cortez, 2008; Kim, 2008; Pomerantz, 2001; Ross, 2011; Shin, 2009; Song, 2010; Tomita, 2011; Torres-Olave, 2006; Villarreal Ballesteros, 2010; Zacharias, 2010. (4) See Dagenais et al., 2008; Mastrella-De-Andrade & Norton, 2011; Norton (2013); Xu, 2001. (5) Kanno & Norton, 2003; Norton & Early, 2011; Norton & Gao, 2008; Norton & McKinney, 2011; Norton & Morgan, 2013; Norton & Pavlenko, 2004; Norton & Toohey, 2011. (6) See for example Bearse & de Jong, 2008; Chang, 2011; Cummins, 2006; De Costa, 2010a; Haneda, 2005; McKay & Wong, 1996; Pittaway, 2004; Potowski, 2007; Skilton-Sylvester, 2002. (7) See for example Carroll, Motha & Price, 2008; Chang, 2011; Dagenais, 2003; Early & Norton, in press; Gao, 2012; Gordon, 2004; Murphey, Jin & Li-Chin, 2005; Norton & Kamal, 2003; Pavlenko, 2003; Silberstein, 2003; Xu, 2012. (8) Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Lam 2000, 2006; Lam & Rosario-Ramos, 2009; Lewis & Fabos, 2005; Mutonyi & Norton, 2007; Prinsloo & Rowsell, 2012; Snyder & Prinsloo, 2007; Thorne & Black, 2007; Warschauer, 2003; White, 2007. (9) See for example Block & Cameron, 2002; Garciá, Skutnabb-Kangas & Torres-Guzmán, 2006; Lin & Martin, 2005; Morgan & Ramanathan, 2005; Pennycook, 2007; Rassool, 2007. (10) See Clarke, 2008; Hawkins, 2004, 2011; Hawkins & Norton, 2009; Kanno & Stuart, 2011; Morgan, 2004; Norton & Early, 2011; Pennycook, 2004; Varghese et al., 2005. (11) See for example Barton, 2007; Blommaert, 2008; Hornberger, 2003; Janks, 2010; Kramsch & Lam, 1999; Kress et al., 2004; Lam & Warriner, 2012; Martin-Jones & 28 Ident ity and Language LearningJones, 2000; Moje & Luke, 2009; Prinsloo & Baynham, 2008; Street & Hornberger, 2008. (12) All the names of people and places used in the study have been changed.ReferencesAbdi, K. (2011). ‘She really only speaks English’: Positioning, language ideology, and heri-tage language learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review 67.2, 161–189.Albright, J. & Luke, A. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu and Literacy Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Alim, S., Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. (2008). Global Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language. New York, NY: Routledge.Amin, N. (1997). Race and the identity of the nonnative ESL teacher. TESOL Quarterly 31, 580–583.Andema, S. (2009). Digital Literacy and Teacher Education in East Africa: The Case of Bondo Primary Teachers’ College, Uganda. Unpublished MA thesis, University of British Columbia.Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (rev. edn.). New York: Verso.Anya, O. C. (2011). Investments in communities of learners and speakers: How African American students of Portuguese negotiate ethno-racialized, gendered, and social-classed identities in second language learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Arkoudis, S. & Davison, C. (guest eds) (2008). Chinese students: Perspectives on their social, cognitive, and linguistic investment in English medium interaction. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 18.1 (special issue).Atkinson, D. (ed.) (2011). Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. London and New York: Routledge.Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (C. Emerson, trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1963.)Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.Barkhuizen, G. (2008). A narrative approach to exploring context in language teaching. English Language Teaching Journal 62.3, 231–239.Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language (2nd edn.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Bearse, C. & de Jong, E. J. (2008). Cultural and linguistic investment: Adolescents in a sec-ondary two-way immersion program. Equity and Excellence in Education 41.3, 325–340.Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.Blackledge, A. (2003). Imagining a monocultural community: Racialization of cultural prac-tice in educational discourse. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 2.4, 331–347.Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. (2008). Contesting ‘language’ as ‘heritage’: Negotiation of identities in later modernity. Applied Linguistics 29.4, 533–554.Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective. London and New York: Continuum.Block, D. (2003). The Social Turn in Second Language Acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Block, D. (2006). Multilingual Identities in a Global City: London stories. London: Palgrave.Block, D. (2007a). The rise of identity in SLA research, post Firth and Wagner (1997). Modern Language Journal 91.5, 863–876.Introduct ion 29Block, D. (2007b). Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.Block, D. (2010). Researching language and identity. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakti (eds), Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. London: Continuum, 337–347.Block, D. (2012). Class and SLA: Making connections. Language Teaching Research 16.2, 188–205.Block, D. & Cameron, D. (eds) (2002). Globalization and Language Teaching. New York: Routledge.Block, D., Gray, J. & Holborow, M. (eds) (2012). Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Blommaert, J. (2008). Grassroots Literacy: Writing, Identity, and Voice in Central Africa. London and New York: Routledge.Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16.6, 645–668.Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (R. Nice, trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power (J. B. Thompson, ed.; G. Raymond & M. Adamson, trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published in 1982.)Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. London/Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7.4–5, 585–614.Budach, G. (2009). ‘Canada meets France’: recasting identities of Canadianness and Francité through global economic exchanges. In J. Collins, S. Slembrouck, & M. Baynham (eds), Globalization and Language in Contact: Scale Migration and Communicative Practices. London: Continuum, 209–232.Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. & Iedema, R. (eds) (2008). Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Cameron, D. (2006). On Language and Sexual Politics. New York and London: Routledge.Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Globalisation, methods, and practice in periphery classrooms. In D. Block & D. Cameron (eds), Globalisation and Language Teaching. London and New York: Routledge, 134–150.Canagarajah, A. S. (2004a). Subversive identities, pedagogical safe houses, and critical learning. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 116–137.Canagarajah, A. S. (ed.) (2004b). Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Canagarajah, A. S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and lan-guage acquisition. Modern Language Journal 91 (focus issue), 923–939.Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnogra-phy. TESOL Quarterly 46.2, 258–279.Carroll, S., Motha, S. & Price, J. (2008). Accessing imagined communities and reinscribing regimes of truth. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 5.3, 165–191.Chang, Y.-J. (2011). Picking one’s battles: NNES doctoral students’ imagined communities and selections of investment. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10: 213–230.Clark, J. B. (2009). Multilingualism, Citizenship, and Identity: Voices of Youth and Symbolic Investments in an Urban, Globalized World. London: Continuum.Clarke, M. (2008). Language Teacher Identities: Co-constructing Discourse and Community. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.30 Ident ity and Language LearningClemente, A. M. & Higgins, M. (2008). Performing English with a Postcolonial Accent: Ethnographic Narratives from Mexico. London: Tufnell Publishing.Cornwell, S. (2005). Language Investment, Possible Selves, and Communities of Practice: Inside a Japanese Junior College Temple. Unpublished PhD thesis, Temple University.Cortez, N. A. (2008). Am I in the Book? Imagined Communities and Language Ideologies of English in a Global EFL Textbook. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Arizona.Crookes, G. (2009). Values, Philosophies, and Beliefs in TESOL: Making a Statement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society (2nd edn.). Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.Cummins, J. (2006). Identity texts: The imaginative construction of self through multi-literacies pedagogy. In O. Garcia, T. Skutnabb-Kangas & M. Torres-Guzman (eds), Imagining Multilingual Schools: Language in Education and Glocalization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 51–68.Cummins, J. & Early, M. (eds) (2011). Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Curtis, A. & Romney, M. (2006). Color, Race, and English Language Teaching: Shades of Meaning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Dagenais, D. (2003). Accessing imagined communities through multilingualism and immersion education. Language, Identity and Education 2.4, 269–283.Dagenais, D., Beynon, J., Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (2008). Liens entre la langue et l’identité dans le discours des apprenants, des parents et des enseignants. In C. Kramsch, D. Lévy & G. Zarate (eds), Précis Critique du Plurilinguisme et du Pluriculturalisme. Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines/Contemporary Publishing International, 301–306.Dagenais, D., Moore, D., Lamarre, S., Sabatier, C. & Armand, F. (2008). Linguistic landscape and language awareness. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (eds), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 253–269.Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20.1, 43–63.Davis, K. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistic research. TESOL Quarterly 29.3, 427–454.Davis, K. & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (eds) (2004). Gender in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 38.3 (special issue).Day, E. (2002). Identity and the Young English Language Learner. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.De Costa, P. I. (2007). The chasm widens: The trouble with personal identity in Singapore writing. In M. Mantero (ed.), Identity and Second Language Learning: Culture, Inquiry, and Dialogic Activity in Educational Contexts. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 190–234.De Costa, P. I. (2010a). Language ideologies and standard English language policy in Singapore: Responses of a ‘designer immigrant’ student. Language Policy 9.3, 217–239.De Costa, P. I. (2010b). Let’s collaborate: Using developments in global English research to advance socioculturally-oriented SLA identity work. Issues in Applied Linguistics 18.1, 99–124.De Costa, P. I. (2010c). From refugee to transformer: A Bourdieusian take on a Hmong learner’s trajectory. TESOL Quarterly 44.3, 517–541.De Costa, P. I. (2011). Using language ideology and positioning to broaden the SLA learner beliefs landscape: The case of an ESL learner from China. System 39.3, 347–358.De Costa, P. I. (2012). Constructing SLA differently: The value of ELF and language ideol-ogy in an ASEAN case study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22.2, 205–224.Introduct ion 31Denos, C., Toohey, K., Neilson, K. & Waterstone, B. (2009). Collaborative Research in Multilingual Classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Dong, J. & Blommaert, J. (2009). Space, scale and accents: constructing migrant identity in Beijing. In J. Collins, S. Slembrouck & M. Baynham (eds), Globalization and Language in Contact: Scale Migration and Communicative Practices. London: Continuum, 42–61.Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (eds) (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Duff, P. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics 23, 289–322.Duff, P. (2012). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 410–426.Early, M. & Norton, B. (in press). Language learner stories and imagined identities. Narrative Inquiry.Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd edn.). Harlow, UK: Pearson/Longman.Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Gao, F. (2012). Imagined community, identity, and Chinese language teaching in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22:1, 140–154.Gao, Y. H. (2007). Legitimacy of foreign language learning and identity research: Structuralist and constructivist perspectives. Intercultural Communication Studies 16.1, 100–112.Garciá, O., Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Torres-Guzmán, M. E. (eds) (2006). Imagining Multilingual Schools: Languages in Education and Glocalization. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Gass, S. (1998). Applied and oranges: Or why apples are not oranges and don’t need to be. A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal 82, 83–90.Gass, S. M. & Makoni, S. (eds) (2004). World applied linguistics: A celebration of AILA at 40. AILA Review 17 (special issue).Gee, J. P. (2012). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In R. Rogers (ed.), An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge, 23–45.Goldstein, T. (1996). Two Languages at Work: Bilingual Life on the Production Floor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Gordon, D. (2004). ‘I’m tired. You clean and cook.’ Shifting gender identities and second language socialization. TESOL Quarterly 38.3, 437–457.Gunderson, L. (2007). English-Only Instruction and Immigrant Students in Secondary Schools: A Critical Examination. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hall, S. (1992a). The question of cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held & T. McGrew (eds), Modernity and its Futures. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers and The Open University, 274–325.Hall, S. (1992b). New ethnicities. In J. Donald & A. Rattansi (eds), ‘Race’, Culture and Difference. London: Sage, 252–259.Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.Haneda, M. (2005). Investing in foreign-language writing: A study of two multicultural learners. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 4.4, 269–290.Hawkins, M. R. (ed.) (2004). Language Learning and Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Approach. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Hawkins, M. R. (ed.) (2011). Social Justice Teacher Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.32 Ident ity and Language LearningHawkins, M. & Norton, B. (2009). Critical language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. Richards (eds), Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education. (pp. 30–39).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.He, A. W. (2006). Toward an identity theory of the development of Chinese as a heritage language. Heritage Language Journal 4.1, 1–28.Heller, M. (2007). Linguistic Minorities and Modernity: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography (2nd edn.). London: Continuum.Heller, M. (2008). Bourdieu and ‘literacy education’. In J. Albright & A. Luke (eds), Pierre Bourdieu and Literacy Education. New York: Routledge.Heller, M. (2011). Paths to Post-Nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Higgins, C. (2009). English as a Local Language: Post-Colonial Identities and Multilingual Practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Higgins, C. (2010). Gender identities in language education. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (eds), Sociolinguistics and Language Education (pp. 370–397). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Higgins, C. (ed.) (2011). Identity Formation in Globalizing Contexts: Language Learning in the New Millennium. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Hornberger, N. (ed.) (2003). Continua of Biliteracy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Hull, G. (2007). Mobile Texts and Migrant Audiences: Rethinking Literacy in a New Media Age. Plenary presentation to annual conference of the National Reading Conference. Austin, TX.Hyland, H. (2012). Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Ibrahim, A. E. (1999). Becoming Black: Rap and hip-hop, race, gender, identity, and the politics of ESL learning. TESOL Quarterly 33.3, 349–369.Jaffe, A. (ed.) (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and Power. New York and London: Routledge.Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kanno, Y. (2003). Negotiating Bilingual and Bicultural Identities: Japanese Returnees Betwixt Two Worlds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Kanno, Y. (2008). Language and Education in Japan: Unequal Access to Bilingualism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Kanno, Y. & Norton, B. (guest eds) (2003). Imagined communities and educational pos-sibilities. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2.4 (special issue).Kanno, Y. & Stuart, C. (2011). Learning to become a second language teacher: Identities-in-practice. Modern Language Journal 95.2, 236–252.Kendrick, M. & Jones, S. (2008). Girls’ visual representations of literacy in a rural Ugandan community. Canadian Journal of Education 31.3, 372–404.Kendrick, M., Jones, S., Mutonyi, H. & Norton, B. (2006). Multimodality and English education in Ugandan schools. English Studies in Africa 49.1, 95–114.Kim, J. (2008). Negotiating Multiple Investments in Languages and Identities: The Language Socialization of Generation 1.5 Korean Canadian University Students. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.King, B. (2008). ‘Being gay guy, that is the advantage’: Queer Korean language learning and identity construction. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 7.3–4, 230–252.Kramsch, C. (2006). The traffic in meaning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 26.1, 99–104.Kramsch, C. (2009). The Multilingual Subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kramsch, C. & Lam, W. S. E. (1999). Textual identities: The importance of being non-native. In G. Braine (ed.), Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57–72.Introduct ion 33Kramsch, C. & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (eds), Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge, 83–100.Kramsch, C. & Whiteside, A. (2007). Three fundamental concepts in second language acquisition and their relevance in multilingual contexts. The Modern Language Journal 91, 907–922.Kramsch, C. & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics 29.4, 645–671.Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K. & Reid, E. (2004). English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. London and New York: Routledge.Kubota, R. (2004). Critical multiculturalism and second language education. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 30–52.Kubota, R. & Lin, A. (2006). Race and TESOL: Introduction to concepts and theor- ies. TESOL Quarterly 40.3 (special issue), 471–493.Kubota, R. & Lin, A. (eds) (2009). Race, Culture, and Identities in Second Language Education: Exploring Critically Engaged Practice. London and New York: Routledge.Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Language Teacher Education for a Global Society. New York: Routledge.Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly 34.3, 457–482.Lam, W. S. E. (2006). Re-envisioning language, literacy and the immigrant subject in new mediascapes. Pedagogies: An International Journal 1.3, 171–195.Lam, W. S. E. & Rosario-Ramos, E. (2009). Multilingual literacies in transnational digi-tally mediated contexts: an exploratory study of immigrant teens in the United States. Language and Education 23.2, 171–190.Lam, W. S. E. & Warriner, D. (2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices in contexts of migration. Reading Research Quarterly, 47.2, 191–215.Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3.3, 149–164.Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Lee, E. (2008). The ‘other(ing)’ costs of ESL: A Canadian case study. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 18.1, 91–108.Lemke, J. (2008). Identity, development, and desire: Critical questions. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & Iedema, R. (eds) (2008). Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–42.Leung, C., Harris, R. & Rampton, B. (2004). Living with inelegance in qualitative research on task-based learning. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 242–267.Lewis, C. & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly 40.4, 470–501.Lin, A. (ed.) (2007). Problematizing Identity: Everyday Struggles in Language, Culture, and Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Lin, A. & Martin, P. (2005). Decolonisation, Globalisation: Language-in-Education Policy and Practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Lin, A., Grant, R., Kubota, R., Motha, S., Tinker Sachs, G. & Vandrick, S. (2004). Women faculty of color in TESOL: Theorizing our lived experiences. TESOL Quarterly 38, 487–504.34 Ident ity and Language LearningLo Bianco, J., Orton, J. & Gao, Y. (eds) (2009). China and English: Globalisation and the Dilemmas of Identity. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Luke, A. (2004a). Two takes on the critical. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 21–29.Luke, A. (2004b). Teaching after the market: From commodity to cosmopolitan. Teachers College Record 106.7, 1422–1443.Luke, A. (2009). Race and language as capital in school: A sociological template for lan-guage education reform. In R. Kubota & A. Lin (eds), Race, Culture and Identities in Second Language Education. London: Routledge.Makoni, S. & Meinhof, U. (eds) (2003). Africa and applied linguistics. AILA Review 16 (special issue).Makubalo, G. (2007). ‘I don’t know . . . it contradicts’: Identity construction and the use of English by learners in a desegregated school space. English Academy Review 24.2, 25–41.Mantero, M. (ed.) (2007). Identity and Second Language Learning: Culture, Inquiry, and Dialogic Activity in Educational Contexts. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 190–234.Markee, N. (guest ed.) (2002). Language in development. TESOL Quarterly 36, 3.Martin-Jones, M. & Jones, K. (2000). Multilingual Literacies. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Martinec, R. & van Leeuwen, T. J. (2009). The Language of New Media Design: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Mastrella-De-Andrade, M. & Norton, B. (2011). Querer é poder? Motivação, identidade e aprendizagem de língua estrangeira. In Mastrella-De-Andrade M. R. (Org.) Afetividade e Emoções no Ensino/Aprendizagem de Línguas: Múltiplos Olhares. Campinas: Pontes Editores, 89–114.May, S. (2008). Language and Minority Rights. London and New York: Routledge.McKay, S. & Wong, S. C. (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Educational Review 66.3, 577–608.McKinney, C. (2007). ‘If I speak English does it make me less black anyway?’ ‘Race’ and English in South African desegregated schools. English Academy Review 24.2, 6–24.McKinney, C. & Norton, B. (2008). Identity in language and literacy education. In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (eds), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 192–205.McKinney, C. & van Pletzen, E. (2004). ‘. . . This apartheid story . . . we’ve finished with it’: Student responses to the apartheid past in a South African English studies course. Teaching in Higher Education 9.2, 159–170.Menard-Warwick, J. (2006). Both a fiction and an existential fact: Theorizing identity in second language acquisition and literacy studies. Linguistics and Education 16, 253–274.Menard-Warwick, J. (2007). ‘Because she made beds. Every day.’ Social positioning, class-room discourse and language learning. Applied Linguistics 29.2, 267–289.Menard-Warwick, J. (2009). Gendered Identities and Immigrant Language Learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Miller, J. (2003). Audible Difference: ESL and Social Identity in Schools. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Moffatt, L. & Norton, B. (2008). Reading gender relations and sexuality: Preteens speak out. Canadian Journal of Education 31.31, 102–123.Moje, E. B. & Luke, A. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly 44.4, 415–437.Morgan, B. (2004). Teacher identity as pedagogy: Towards a field-internal conceptualiza-tion in bilingual and second language education. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7.2&3, 172–188.Introduct ion 35Morgan, B. (2007). Poststructuralism and applied linguistics: Complementary approaches to identity and culture in ELT. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (eds), International Handbook of English Language Teaching. New York: Springer, 1033–1052.Morgan, B. & Clarke, M. (2011). Identity in second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning Volume II. New York: Routledge, 817–836.Morgan, B. & Ramanathan, V. (2005). Critical literacies and language education: Global and local perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 25, 151–169.Motha, S. (2006). Racializing ESOL teacher identities in US K12 public schools. TESOL Quarterly 40.3, 495–518.Murphey, T., Jin, C. & Li-Chin, C. (2005). Learners’ constructions of identities and imag-ined communities. In P. Benson & D. Nunan (eds), Learners’ Stories and Diversity in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 83–100.Mutonyi, H. & Norton, B. (2007). ICT on the margins: Lessons for Ugandan education. Digital literacy in global contexts. Language and Education 21.3 (special issue), 264–270.Nelson, C. (2009). Sexual Identities in English Language Education: Classroom Conversations. New York: Routledge.Nongogo, N. (2007). ‘Mina ‘NgumZulu Phaqa’ Language and identity among multi- lingual Grade 9 learners at a private desegregated high school in South Africa. English Academy Review 24.2, 42–54.Norton, B. (guest ed.) (1997). Language and identity. TESOL Quarterly 31.3 (special issue).Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language class-room. In M. Breen (ed.), Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research. London: Pearson Education Limited, 159–171.Norton, B. (2006). Identity: Second language. In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (vol. 5) (2nd edn.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 502–507.Norton, B. (2010). Language and identity. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (eds), Sociolinguistics and Language Education. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters, 349–369.Norton, B. (2013). Identität, Literalität und Mehrsprachigkeit im Unterricht. In A. Bertschi-Kaufmann & C. Rosebrock: Literalität Erfassen: Bildungspolitisch, Kulturell, Individuell. Weinheim und München: Juventa, 123–134.Norton, B. & Early, M. (2011). Researcher identity, narrative inquiry, and language teach-ing research. TESOL Quarterly 45.3, 415–439.Norton, B. & Gao, Y. (2008). Identity, investment, and Chinese learners of English. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 18.1, 109–120.Norton, B. & Kamal, F. (2003). The imagined communities of English language learners in a Pakistani school. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2.4, 301–307.Norton, B. & McKinney, C. (2011). An identity approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 73–94.Norton, B. & Morgan, B. (2013). In Poststructuralism. In C. Chapelle (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0924Norton, B. & Pavlenko, A. (eds) (2004). Gender and English Language Learners. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly 35.2, 307–322.Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (2002). Identity and language learning. In R. Kaplan (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford.Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (eds) (2004). Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.36 Ident ity and Language LearningNorton, B. & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching 44.4, 412–446.Norton, B. & Williams, C. J. (2012). Digital identities, student investments, and eGranary as a placed resource. Language and Education 26.4, 315–329.Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29.1, 9–31.Omoniyi, T. (2011). Discourse and identity. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (eds), Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 260–278.Oxford, R. & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal 78.1, 12–28.Pavlenko, A. (2001a). Language learning memoirs as gendered genre. Applied Linguistics 22.2, 213–240.Pavlenko, A. (2001b). ‘How am I to become a woman in an American vein?’: Transformations of gender performance in second language learning. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (eds), Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 133–174.Pavlenko, A. (2003). ‘I never knew I was a bilingual’: Reimagining teacher identities in TESOL. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2.4, 251–268.Pavlenko, A. & Blackledge, A. (eds) (2004). Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I. & Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (2001). Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Pavlenko, A. & Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language teaching. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (eds), International Handbook of English Language Teaching. New York: Springer, 669–680.Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Pennycook, A. (2004). Critical moments in a TESOL praxicum. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 327–345.Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London and New York: Routledge.Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a Local Practice. New York: Routledge.Pennycook, A. (2012). Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places. Bristol, UK: Multi- lingual Matters.Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic Imperialism Continued. New York and London: Routledge.Pittaway, D. (2004). Investment and second language acquisition. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies 4.1, 203–218.Pomerantz, A. I. (2001). Beyond the Good Language Learner: Ideology, Identity, and Investment in Classroom Foreign Language Learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Pomerantz, A. (2008). ‘Tú necisitas preguntar en Español’: Negotiating good language learner identity in a Spanish classroom. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7.3/4, 253–271.Potowski, K. (2007). Language and Identity in a Dual Immersion School. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Prinsloo, M. & Baynham, M. (eds) (2008). Literacies, Global and Local. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Prinsloo, M. & Rowsell, J. (guest eds) (2012). Digital literacies as placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education 26.4 (special issue).Ramanathan, V. (2005). The English-Vernacular Divide: Postcolonial Language Politics and Practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Ramanathan, V. & Morgan, B. (guest eds) (2007). Language policies and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly 41.3 (special issue).Introduct ion 37Rampton, B. (2006). Language in Late Modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Rassool, N. (2007). Global Issues in Language, Education and Development: Perspectives from Postcolonial Countries. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Ricento, T. (2005). Considerations of identity in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research on Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 895–911.Ross, B. M. (2011). Language, Identity, and Investment in the English Language of a Group of Mexican Women Living in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Unpublished PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University.Saussure, F. de (1966). Course in General Linguistics. (W. Baskin, trans. [1916]). New York: McGraw-Hill.Sharkey, J. & Johnson, K. (eds) (2003). The TESOL Quarterly Dialogues: Rethinking Issues of Language, Culture, and Power. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Shin, J. (2009). Critical Ethnography of a Multilingual and Multicultural Korean Language Classroom: Discourses on Identity, Investment and Korean-Ness. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Shin, S. (2012). Bilingualism in Schools and Society: Language, Identity, and Policy. New York: Routledge.Shuck, G. (2006). Racializing the nonnative English speaker. Journal of Language, Identity and Education 5.4, 259–276.Silberstein, S. (2003). Imagined communities and national fantasies in the O. J. Simpson case. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2.4, 319–330.Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2002). Should I stay or should I go? Investigating Cambodian wom-en’s participation and investment in adult ESL programs. Adult Education Quarterly 53.1, 9–26.Snyder, I. & Prinsloo, M. (guest eds) (2007). The digital literacy practices of young people in marginal contexts. Language and Education: An International Journal 21.3 (special issue).Song, H. (2010). Imagined Communities, Language Learning and Identity in Highly Skilled Transnational Migrants: A Case Study of Korean Migrants in Canada. Unpublished M. Ed thesis, University of Manitoba.Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Stein, P. (2008). Multimodal Pedagogies in Diverse Classrooms: Representation, Rights and Resources. London and New York: Routledge.Street, B. & Hornberger, N. (eds) (2008). Encyclopedia of Language and Education (vol. 2: Literacy). Boston, MA: Springer.Stroud, C. & Wee, L. (2012). Style, Identity and Literacy: English in Singapore. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.Sunderland, J. (2004). Gendered Discourses. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Swain, M. & Deters, P. (2007). ‘New’ mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. Modern Language Journal 91 (focus issue), 820–836.Talmy, S. (2008). The cultural productions of the ESL student at Tradewinds High: Contingency, multidirectionality, and identity in L2 socialization. Applied Linguistics 29.4, 619–644.Taylor, L. (2004). Creating a community of difference: Understanding gender and race in a high school anti-discrimination camp. In B. Norton & Pavlenko, A. (eds), Gender and English Language Learners. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 95–109.Tembe, J. & Norton, B. (2008). Promoting local languages in Ugandan primary schools: The community as stakeholder. Canadian Modern Language Review 65.1, 33–60.38 Ident ity and Language LearningThorne, S. & Black, R. (2007). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27, 133–160.Tomita, Y. (2011). The Role of Form-Focused Instruction: Learner Investment in L2 Communication. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at School: Identity, Social Relations and Classroom Practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Toohey, K. (2001). Disputes in child L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly 35.2, 257–278.Toohey, K. & Waterstone, B. (2004). Negotiating expertise in an action research com-munity. In B. Norton and Toohey, K. (eds), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 291–310.Torres-Olave, B. M. (2006). ‘If I didn’t have Professional Dreams Maybe I Wouldn’t Think of Leaving’. Unpublished MA thesis, University of British Columbia.Tremmel, B. & De Costa, P. I. (2011). Exploring identity in SLA: A dialogue about meth-odologies. Language Teaching 44.4, 540–542.Tsui, A. & Tollefson, J. (eds) (2007). Language Policy, Culture, and Identity in Asian Contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Varghese, M., Morgan, B. Johnston, B. & Johnson, K. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 4, 21–44.Villarreal Ballesteros, A. C. (2010). Professional Identity Formation and Development of Imagined Communities in an English Language Major in Mexico. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Arizona.Wagner, J. (2004). The classroom and beyond. Modern Language Journal 88.4, 612–616.Wallace, C. (2003). Critical Reading in Language Education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Warriner, D. S. (guest ed.) (2007). Transnational literacies: Immigration, language learn-ing, and identity. Linguistics and Education 18.3–4.Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Weber, J. J. & Horner, K. (2012). Introducing Multilingualism: A Social Approach. New York: Routledge.Weedon, C. (1987/1997). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory (2nd edn.). London: Blackwell.Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.White, C. (2007). Innovation and identity in distance language learning and teaching. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1.1, 97–110.Wortham, S. (2008). Shifting identities in the classroom. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & R. Iedema (eds), Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 205–228.Xu, H. (2012). Imagined community falling apart: a case study on the transformation of professional identities of novice ESOL teachers in China. TESOL Quarterly 46.3, 568–578.Xu, J. W. (2001). Bonny Norton’s new ideas about foreign language learning. Foreign Language Teaching Abroad 4, 14–17. Language Teaching Abroad.Young, R. F. (2009). Discursive Practice in Language Learning and Teaching. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Zacharias, N. (2010). The Evolving Teacher Identities of L2 South/East Asian Teachers in US Graduate Programs. Unpublished PhD thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.Zimmerman, D. H. (1998). Identity, context, and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (eds), Identities in Talk. London: Sage, 87–106.Zuengler, J. & Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly 40.1, 35–58.Introduct ion 3941Fact and Fiction in Language LearningAs Saliha takes the envelope, she says, ‘Merci beaucoup, Madame Rivest.’ Stepping out the door, she switches the plastic bag containing her work clothes from her right hand to her left hand and extends her right hand to Madame Rivest and says, ‘Bonjour, Madame Rivest’ and smiles. These are the first real words she has uttered since she woke up that morning.In the elevator, going down, Saliha is alone. She checks the contents of the envelope and smiles with satisfaction. Before the elevator reaches the ground floor, Saliha has time to reflect on her day. She has earned enough for the week’s food and cigarettes. Last week, she paid the last instalment for her tuition at Plato College. She is tired but life is under control. Her only regret is that she hasn’t answered Madame Rivest in longer sentences. But she chases away her regrets with a light shrug and admits the reality.We come here to speak like them, she thinks; but it will be a long time before they let us practise.Ternar, 1990, pp. 327–8Although Saliha is a fictional character, her story is real to many language learners, whether in Canada, Colombia or Korea. Saliha is eager to learn the language of her new community in Quebec and she understands the need to practice the French that she is learning in the formal context of Plato College. However, although ‘immersed’ in the francophone community, Saliha has little opportunity to practice French because of the nature of the work she does and the way relations of power are structured in her workplace. In the course of a long day at work, the only words she has uttered are ‘Merci beau-coup, Madame Rivest’ and ‘Bonjour, Madame Rivest’. It is with regret that she notes she has not answered Madame Rivest in longer sentences. The reality that Saliha has to confront is that Madame Rivest has the power to influence when she can speak, how much she can speak and what she can speak about. Saliha acknowledges that it will be a long time before Madame Rivest will ‘let’ her practice speaking the target language.In this chapter, I draw on Saliha’s fictional story in Quebec, Canada to begin an exploration of the relationship between identity and language 1learning, between the individual language learner and the larger social world. I use her story to illustrate notions of power, identity and invest-ment, and conceptions of ethnicity, gender and class. In the following chap-ters of the book, I move from Saliha’s fictional world in Quebec to the lived experiences of five immigrant women learning English in the neigh-boring province of Ontario, Canada. I demonstrate that the opportunities these women had to practice English were structured by unequal relations of power in the home and workplace. I illustrate how the women responded to and acted upon these relations of power to create opportunities to prac-tice speaking English, and the extent to which they succeeded in their efforts. I argue, however, that their efforts must be understood with refer-ence to their investment in English and their changing identities across his-torical time and social space. Thus the ideas and themes introduced in this chapter will re-emerge in later chapters, demonstrating, I believe, that truth is indeed stranger than fiction, life more intriguing than art.Saliha and the SLA CanonSaliha would struggle to recognize herself in current theories of second language acquisition (SLA). She could be overwhelmed by perspectives from psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, neurolinguistics, classroom research, bilingual education and social psychology.1 She would probably agree, how-ever, as Spolsky (1989) notes, that the more she is exposed to and practices French, the more proficient she will become. Extensive exposure to French, in relevant kinds and amounts, and the opportunity to practice the target language will reap many rewards for her. She will learn to discriminate between the sounds of the language, have the opportunity to analyze the language into its constituent parts, learn how its constituent parts can be recombined grammatically into larger units, and develop control over the grammatical and pragmatic structures of French. Saliha would be mystified, however, by Spolsky’s distinction between the natural or informal environ-ment of the target language community and the formal environment of the classroom:The distinction between the two is usually stated as a set of contrasting conditions. In natural second language learning, the language is being used for communication, but in the formal situation it is used only to teach. In natural language learning, the learner is surrounded by fluent speakers of the target language, but in the formal classroom, only the teacher (if anyone) is fluent. In natural learning, the context is the out-side world, open and stimulating; in formal learning, it is the closed four walls of the classroom. In natural language learning, the language used is free and normal; in the formal classroom it is carefully controlled and 42 Ident ity and Language Learningsimplified. Finally, in the natural learning situation, attention is on the meaning of the communication; in the formal situation, it is on mean-ingless drills. (1989, p. 171)‘How much communicating did I do today?’ Saliha may well ask, ‘How meaningful are my conversations with Madame Rivest?’ Because many SLA theorists have not addressed the experiences of language learners with refer-ence to inequitable relations of power between language learners and target language speakers, they have struggled to theorize the relationship between the individual language learner and the larger social world. In general, artifi-cial distinctions have been drawn between the learner and the language learning context. On the one hand, the individual is described with respect to a host of affective variables such as her or his motivation to learn a second language. The personality of the individual is described as introverted or extroverted, inhibited or uninhibited. It is assumed that the learner’s atti-tudes towards the target language community determine how motivated the second language learner is, and that levels of anxiety determine how much comprehensible input becomes cognitive intake.2 The social, on the other hand, generally refers to group differences between the language learner group and the target language group. Where there is congruence between the second language group and the target language group, the social distance between them is considered to be minimal, which in turn facilitates the acculturation of the second language group into the target language group and enhances language learning (Schumann, 1976a). Where there is great social distance between the groups, little acculturation is considered to take place, and as a result members of the second language group are deemed not to become proficient speakers of the target language.In theories of SLA which focus on individual differences, Saliha would be held primarily responsible for progress in learning the target language. The ‘good language learner’3 is one who seeks out opportunities to learn the language, is highly motivated, has good attention to detail, can tolerate ambi-guity and has low levels of anxiety. If Saliha made little progress in learning the second language, she might be considered unmotivated and inflexible. In contrast, theories of SLA which focus on group differences in second lan-guage learning would consider Saliha to have little human agency: social distance and degrees of acculturation would determine the extent to which she learnt the target language, and the role of instruction would be consid-ered tangential to this process. Thus, in many SLA theories, Saliha would be conceived of as an individual with various attributes independent of her rela-tionship to the social or as having a group identity that leaves little room for individual action. The disagreements in the literature on the way affective variables interact with the larger social context would be also be puzzling for Saliha. While Krashen (1981) regards motivation as a variable independent of social context, Spolsky (1989) regards the two as inextricably intertwined. Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 43While Krashen draws distinctions between self-confidence, motivation, and anxiety, Clement, Gardner and Smythe (quoted in Spolsky, 1989) consider motivation and anxiety as a subset of self-confidence. While Krashen consid-ers self-confidence as an intrinsic characteristic of the language learner, Gardner (1985) argues that self-confidence arises from positive experiences in the context of the second language. Such disagreements in the SLA literature should not be dismissed, as Gardner (1989) dismisses them, as ‘more superfi-cial than real’ (p. 137). This debate arises, I suggest, because artificial distinc-tions are drawn between the individual and the social, which lead to arbitrary mapping of particular factors on either the individual or the social, with little rigorous justification.In sum, in the field of SLA, theorists have not adequately addressed why it is that learners like Saliha may sometimes be motivated, extroverted and confident, and sometimes unmotivated, introverted and anxious; why in one place there may be social distance between learners and the target language community, while in another place the social distance may be minimal; why learners can sometimes speak and at other times remain silent. Although muted, there is an uneasy recognition by some theorists that current theory of the relationship between the language learner and the social world is prob-lematic. Scovel (1978), for example, has found that research on foreign lan-guage anxiety suffers from several ambiguities, and Gardner and MacIntyre (1993, p. 9) remain unconvinced of the relationship between ‘personality variables’ and language achievement.Identity and Language LearningThe central argument of this book is that SLA theorists have struggled to conceptualize the relationship between the language learner and the social world because they have not developed a comprehensive theory of identity that integrates the language learner and the language learning con-text. Furthermore, they have not questioned how relations of power in the social world impact on social interaction between second language learners and target language speakers. While many SLA theorists such as Ellis (1985), Krashen (1981), Schumann (1978a) and Stern (1983) recognize that language learners do not live in idealized, homogeneous communities but in complex, heterogeneous ones, such heterogeneity has generally been framed uncritically. Theories of the good language learner have been devel-oped on the premise that language learners can choose under what condi-tions they will interact with members of the target language community and that the language learner’s access to the target language community is a function of the learner’s motivation. Thus Gardner and MacIntyre (1992), for example, argue that ‘the major characteristic of the informal context is that it is voluntary. Individuals can either participate or not in informal 44 Ident ity and Language Learningacquisition contexts’ (p. 213). Second language theorists have not ade-quately explored how inequitable relations of power limit the opportunities second language learners have to practice the target language outside the classroom. In addition, many have assumed that learners can be defined unproblematically as motivated or unmotivated, introverted or extroverted, inhibited or uninhibited, without considering that such affective factors are frequently socially constructed in inequitable relations of power, chang-ing over time and space, and possibly coexisting in contradictory ways in a single individual.In this book I take the position that notions of the individual and the language learner’s personality in SLA theory need to be reconceptualized in ways that will problematize dichotomous distinctions between the language learner and the language learning context. I use the term identity to reference how a person understands his or her relationship to the world, how that relationship is constructed across time and space, and how the person under-stands possibilities for the future. I argue that SLA theory needs to develop a conception of identity that is understood with reference to larger, and fre-quently inequitable, social structures which are reproduced in day-to-day social interaction. In taking this position, I foreground the role of language as constitutive of and constituted by a language learner’s identity. As Heller (1987) demonstrates, it is through language that a person negotiates a sense of self within and across different sites at different points in time, and it is through language that a person gains access to – or is denied access to – powerful social networks that give learners the opportunity to speak. Thus language is not conceived of as a neutral medium of communication, but is understood with reference to its social meaning.Interest in language and identity has been growing in momentum, a trend reflected in the number of doctoral theses that have recently appeared on this topic. Kanno (1996), for example, examined the changing identities of Japanese students returning to their home country after a period of time abroad, and Miller (1999) studied the relationship between speaking and social identity among migrant students in a number of Australian high schools. As the comprehensive reviews of McNamara (1997) and Hansen and Liu (1997) demonstrate, different researchers, drawing on different sources and using a variety of methodologies, have brought diverse perspectives to our understanding of language and identity. Social psychologists such as Henriques et al. (1984) and Edwards and Potter (1992) offer different concep-tions of identity than that associated with the work of scholars such as Tajfel (1982) and Giles and Coupland (1991), while the recent research of SLA scholars in different parts of the world has provided important insights into the relationship between identity and language learning.4 In calling for a reorientation of SLA research, the work of Hall (1997), Lantolf (1996), Rampton (1995) and van Lier (1994) is particularly noteworthy. As Rampton (1995) argues,Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 45The very undifferentiated portrait of the second language learner that emerges in SLA no doubt partly results from its tendency to thematise the learner’s internal psychological condition. Rather than looking at interaction as a socio–historically sensitive arena in which language learner identity is socially negotiated, SLA generally examines learners’ behaviour for evidence of the determining influence of psycholinguistic states and processes . . . At present, SLA could probably benefit from an enhanced sense of the empirical world’s complex socio–cultural diversity. (293–4)As if on cue, international language journals are giving greater attention to research on sociocultural diversity in general, and identity in particular. In 1996, for example, Martin-Jones and Heller (1996) edited two special issues of Linguistics and Education on discourse, identities and power, and Sarangi and Baynham (1996) edited a special double issue of Language and Education on the construction of educational identities. These were followed by a spe-cial issue of TESOL Quarterly on language and identity, which I edited in 1997 (Norton, 1997a).Given the subject of this book, a few comments on the TESOL Quarterly special issue are relevant. The five studies that constitute the bulk of the special issue represent perspectives from Canada (Morgan, 1997), Japan (Duff and Uchida, 1997), the United States (Schecter and Bayley, 1997), South Africa (Thesen, 1997), and England (Leung et al., 1997). What I found particularly interesting was the way in which each author framed and con-ceptualized identity, with the focus of Morgan’s research on social identity, Duff and Uchida’s on sociocultural identity, Thesen’s on voice, Schecter and Bayley’s on cultural identity and Leung et al.’s on ethnic identity. The appar-ent differences between the authors’ conceptualizations of identity, I argue, can be explained partly in terms of the disciplines and research traditions that inform their respective studies, as well as the different emphases of their research projects. Notwithstanding such differences, however, I note that distinctions – such as those between social and cultural identity – become less marked as the researchers ground their theory in specific sites of prac-tice.5 Furthermore, most of the researchers noted that identity construction must be understood with reference to relations of power between language learners and target language speakers. It is to this relationship that I now turn.Power and IdentityAn investigation of the ways in which relations of power impact on language learning and teaching has been initiated by researchers who adopt a critical approach to the field of second language education.6 These 46 Ident ity and Language Learningresearchers have argued that the very heterogeneity of society must be understood with reference to an inequitably structured world in which the gender, race, class and ethnicity of second language learners may serve to marginalize them. Much of this research has been motivated by educa-tional theory within a critical tradition, such as that of Freire (1970, 1985), Giroux (1988, 1992) and Simon (1987, 1992), and has highlighted the fact that language teaching is not a neutral practice but a highly political one. In this book I use the term ‘power’ to reference the socially constructed relations among individuals, institutions and communities through which symbolic and material resources in a society are produced, distributed and validated. By symbolic resources I refer to such resources as language, edu-cation and friendship, while I use the term material resources to include capital goods, real estate and money. Following Foucault (1980) and Simon (1992) I take the position that power is neither monolithic nor invariant; it is not simply something that can be physically possessed, but a relation which always implies social exchange on a particular set of terms. By extension, it is a relation that is constantly being renegotiated as symbolic and material resources in a society change their value. As well, like Foucault (1980), I take the position that power does not operate only at the macro level of powerful institutions such as the legal system, the education system and the social welfare system, but also at the micro level of every-day social encounters between people with differential access to symbolic and material resources – encounters that are inevitably produced within language.To illustrate these notions, consider again the relationship between Madame Rivest and Saliha. In their relationship, Madame Rivest has con-trol over valued symbolic resources (French) and valued material resources (Saliha’s wages). Saliha desires access to both these resources, but it is Madame Rivest who controls how and when these resources are to be dis-tributed and what form they will take. When Saliha bids farewell to Madame Rivest, she does not attempt to prolong the conversation with Madame Rivest and create the opportunity to speak – she simply smiles. If Saliha had sighed, shrugged her shoulders or carried on talking without Madame Rivest’s active participation, her behavior might have been considered inap-propriate and she could have jeopardized her access to the material resources that Madame Rivest provided. This vignette illustrates that control of sym-bolic and material resources are not distinct facets of power, but are inti-mately connected to each other, as well as to the process of social interaction.7Insights from West (1992), Bourdieu (1977), Weedon (1997) and Cummins (1996) are particularly helpful in conceptualizing the relationship between power, identity and language learning. Following West (1992), I take the position that identity references desire – the desire for recognition, the desire for affiliation and the desire for security and safety. Such desires, West Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 47argues, cannot be separated from the distribution of material resources in society. People who have access to a wide range of resources in a society will have access to power and privilege, which will in turn influence how they understand their relationship to the world and their possibilities for the future. Thus the quesion ‘Who am I?’ cannot be understood apart from the question ‘What am I allowed to do?’ And the question ‘What am I allowed to do?’ cannot be understood apart from material conditions that structure opportunities for the realization of desires. According to West, it is a person’s access to material resources that will define the terms on which desires will be articulated. In this view, a person’s identity will shift in accordance with changing social and economic relations.Bourdieu’s (1977) work is complementary to that of West because it focuses on the relationship between identity and symbolic power. In argu-ing that ‘speech always owes a major part of its value to the value of the person who utters it’ (p. 652), Bourdieu suggests that the value ascribed to speech cannot be understood apart from the person who speaks, and the person who speaks cannot be understood apart from larger networks of social relationships. His position is that the linguist (and, I would argue, many applied linguists) take for granted the conditions for the establish-ment of communication: that those who speak regard those who listen as worthy to listen, and that those who listen regard those who speak as worthy to speak. I have argued, however, in Norton Peirce (1995), that it is precisely such assumptions that must be called into question. In the follow-ing chapters I draw on Bourdieu to suggest that an expanded definition of communicative competence should include the ‘right to speech’ (what I have translated as the right to speak) or the ‘the power to impose reception’ (1977, p. 75).Unlike West and Bourdieu, Weedon (1997) has worked within a feminist poststructuralist tradition. While West’s work has focused on the relation-ship between identity and material relations of power, and Bourdieu’s on the relationship between identity and symbolic power, Weedon has sought to integrate language, individual experience and social power in a theory of subjectivity. In this theory, the individual is accorded greater human agency than in Bourdieu’s theory, while the importance of language in constructing the relationship between the individual and the social is given greater promi-nence than in West’s theory. Three defining characteristics of subjectivity are comprehensively investigated in Chapter 6 of this book: the multiple, nonunitary nature of the subject; subjectivity as a site of struggle; and sub-jectivity as changing over time. Furthermore, and of central importance, subjectivity and language are theorized as mutually constitutive. As Weedon (1997) says, ‘Language is the place where actual and possible forms of social organization and their likely social and political consequences are defined and contested. Yet it is also the place where our sense of ourselves, our sub-jectivity, is constructed’ (p. 21).48 Ident ity and Language LearningIn drawing a distinction between coercive and collaborative relations of power, Cummins (1996) makes an important contribution to an under-standing of the relationship between identity and power. He argues that coercive power relations refer to the exercise of power by a dominant indi-vidual, group or country that is detrimental to others and serves to main-tain an inequitable division of resources in a society. Collaborative relations of power, on the other hand, can serve to empower rather than marginalize. In his view, it is possible for power to be coercive or productive; it is possible for both dominant and subordinate groups in a society to exercise power, but the realm of influence of the dominant group will be far greater than that of the subordinate group. Indeed, the dominant group may try to exer-cise absolute power by encouraging all members of a society to accept the status quo as normal and beyond critique. Thus power is not a fixed, prede-termined quantity, but can be mutually generated in interpersonal and intergroup relations. As Cummins (1996) notes, ‘The power relationship is additive rather than subtractive. Power is created with others rather than being imposed on or exercised over others’ (p. 21). By extension, relations of power can serve to enable or constrain the range of identities that language learners can negotiate in their classrooms and communities.To continue with my illustration, how might we understand Saliha’s identity and the way in which her identity constructs and is constructed by her interaction with Madame Rivest? Notwithstanding the complex history Saliha has had before coming to Quebec, Saliha identifies herself as an immigrant language learner who has little power to control the progress of her interaction with Madame Rivest. She signals the unequal relations of power between language learners and target language speakers in Quebec by using we/they referents (‘we come here to speak like them’). The ‘we’ to whom Saliha refers are the immigrants who have come to Quebec and seek to speak like francophone Quebecers (‘them’) who have access to desirable symbolic and material resources in Quebec society. Saliha’s identity in this context must be understood with reference to her contradictory relationship to Madame Rivest. On the one hand, Saliha wants to have more interaction with Madame Rivest, greater control over the symbolic resources of her new society, and access to the power and privilege enjoyed by Madame Rivest and other francophone Quebecers. On the other hand, Saliha does not want to jeopardize her access to desperately needed material resources which help to sustain her from day to day. Significantly, it is these conflicts about who she is, what she needs, and how she desires that keep Saliha silent. But such conflict between her desire for symbolic resources and her desire for material resources are cap-tured in her smiles. Saliha smiles obediently when she bids Madame Rivest farewell, resisting the impulse to respond in longer sentences. And she smiles again, in private, when she opens the envelope which contains the material resources to sustain her for the following week.Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 49Motivation and InvestmentIt is intriguing to consider whether Saliha was motivated or unmoti-vated to speak. In the field of second language learning, the concept of motivation is drawn primarily from the field of social psychology, where attempts have been made to quantify a learner’s commitment to learning the target language. The work of Gardner and Lambert (1972) has been particularly influential in introducing the notions of instrumental and inte-grative motivation into the field of SLA. In their work, instrumental moti-vation references the desire that language learners have to learn a second language for utilitarian purposes, such as employment, while integrative motivation references the desire to learn a language to integrate success-fully with the target language community. While researchers such as Crookes and Schmidt (1991), Dornyei (1994, 1997), and Oxford and Shearin (1994) have sought to broaden the theoretical framework proposed by Gardner and Lambert, such debates on motivation in the field of SLA do not capture the complex relationship between power, identity and lan-guage learning that I have observed in my research. The concept of invest-ment, which I introduced in Norton Peirce (1995), signals the socially and historically constructed relationship of learners to the target language, and their often ambivalent desire to learn and practice it. It is best understood with reference to the economic metaphors that Bourdieu uses in his work – in particular the notion of cultural capital. Bourdieu and Passeron (1977) use the term ‘cultural capital’ to reference the knowledge and modes of thought that characterize different classes and groups in relation to specific sets of social forms. They argue that some forms of cultural capital have a higher exchange value than others in relation to a set of social forms which value some forms of knowledge and thought over others. If learners invest in a second language, they do so with the understanding that they will acquire a wider range of symbolic and material resources, which will in turn increase the value of their cultural capital. Learners expect or hope to have a good return on that investment – a return that will give them access to hitherto unattainable resources.It is important to note that the notion of investment I am advocating is not equivalent to instrumental motivation. The conception of instrumental motivation presupposes a unitary, fixed, and ahistorical language learner who desires access to material resources that are the privilege of target lan-guage speakers. The notion of investment, on the other hand, conceives of the language learner as having a complex social history and multiple desires. The notion presupposes that when language learners speak, they are not only exchanging information with target language speakers, but they are constantly organizing and reorganizing a sense of who they are and how they relate to the social world. Thus an investment in the target language is 50 Ident ity and Language Learningalso an investment in a learner’s own identity, an identity which is con-stantly changing across time and space. In this spirit, the questions ‘Is Saliha motivated to learn the target language? What kind of personality does Saliha have?’ may not be as helpful as the questions ‘What is Saliha’s investment in the target language? How is Saliha’s relationship to the target language socially and historically constructed?’ As I will demonstrate in this book, a learner’s investment in the target language may be complex, contradictory and in a state of flux.In a study of Chinese adolescent immigrant students in the United States, McKay and Wong (1996) extend the notion of investment developed by Norton Peirce (1995). Like Norton Peirce, they demonstrate how the spe-cific needs, desires and negotiations of the learners were not distractions from the task of language learning, but ‘must be regarded as constituting the very fabric of students’ lives and as determining their investment in learning the target language’ (1996, p. 603). McKay and Wong (1996) note, however, that while Norton Peirce (1995) focused on opportunities to speak, their research investigated students’ investment in the four skills of listening, speaking, reading and writing. They argue that investment in each of these skills can be highly selective and that different skills can have different values in relation to learner identities. This latter theme is developed in greater detail by Angelil-Carter (1997), whose study addresses the develop-ment of academic literacy by English language learners in a South African university. She argues as follows:For [Norton] Peirce’s (1995) concept of investment to take on meaning in the academic language learning context, I believe, it can usefully be broken down from its broad idea of investment in a target language such as English to investment in literacies, forms of writing or speaking – let us call them discourses – that are dislodged and recon-structed over time and space. Such investments may play a powerful facilitating or hindering role in the acquisition of new discourses. (p. 268)There is evidence that the notion of investment is receiving some attention in the mainstream SLA literature. Ellis, in his 1997 book, Second Language Acquisition, contrasts the work of Norton Peirce (1995) with that of Schumann (1978a), defining investment as the ‘learners’ commitment to learning an L2, which is viewed as related to the social identities they construct for them-selves as learners’ (Ellis, 1997, p. 140). In McKay and Wong’s study, as in Angelil-Carter’s and Norton Peirce’s, the relationship between ethnicity, identity and language learning is a central motif in the analysis. I turn next to a fuller investigation of ethnicity, gender and class in relation to identity and language learning.Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 51Ethnicity, Gender and ClassHeller (1987) argues that people growing up in a homogeneous society would not define themselves as ethnic, and that ethnicity is a product of opposition. It is this kind of opposition that Saliha experiences in her rela-tionship with Madame Rivest, and Saliha’s sense of otherness is socially con-structed within relationships such as this one. Saliha is excluded from Madame Rivest’s powerful ethnic social network – a network which Heller would argue is defined by common language:Thus the first principle of ethnic identity formation is participation in ethnic social networks, and therefore in activities controlled by ethnic group members. Language is important here as a means by which access to networks is regulated: If you do not speak the right language, you do not have access to forming relationships with certain people, or to par-ticipating in certain activities. (p. 181)Drawing on her research with immigrant women in Canada, Ng (1981, 1987), like Heller, argues that ethnicity must be understood as a set of social relations that organize people in relation to larger social processes in society. She notes in particular that conventional research draws on observable fea-tures such as language and customs to determine criteria for ethnicity and pays little attention to the day-to-day experiences of immigrants. Yet, Ng stresses, it is only in the context of such interactions with members of the larger society that ethnicity becomes an issue for immigrants. Furthermore, Ng (1981) notes that immigrant women occupy a particular and different location in society to immigrant men, and that experiences of immigration must be understood as gendered ones.In theorizing the gendered nature of the immigrant language learner’s experience, I am concerned not only with the silencing that women experi-ence within the context of larger patriarchal structures in society,8 but also with the gendered access to the public world that immigrant women, in particular, experience. It is in the public world that language learners have the opportunity to interact with members of the target language commu-nity, but it is the public world that is not easily accessible to immigrant women. As will be discussed in the following chapters, even when such access is granted, the nature of the work available to immigrant women provides few opportunities for social interaction.Like ethnic and gendered identities, a classed identity is one that is pro-duced in specific sets of social, historical and economic relations of power which are reinforced and reproduced in everyday social encounters. In this regard, the concept of class articulated by Connell, Ashendon, Kessler and Dowsett (1982) is helpful. While in conventional sociological terms, a class is understood as sets of individuals who share the same attributes or 52 Ident ity and Language Learning possessions, such as level of income, type of occupation, level of education and ownership of capital, Connell et al. argue that ‘it is not what people are, or even what they own, so much as what they do with their resources’ that is central to an understanding of class (p. 33). In their view, it is problematic to consider the relationship between individuals and class as a ‘location’, in which people are passive markers of a ‘geometrical spot’. Their research indicates that the relationship between individuals and class cannot be reduced to a system of categories; it is, rather, a system of relationships between people. In sum, like Rockhill (1987b), I take the position that eth-nicity, gender and class are not experienced as a series of discrete background variables, but are all, in complex and interconnected ways, implicated in the construction of identity and the possibilities of speech.Rethinking Language and Communicative CompetenceIn arguing that language is constitutive of and constituted by a speaker’s identity, I take the position that language is more than words and sentences. Saliha’s words and sentences, her extended hand, her ambivalent smile and light shrug, cannot be understood apart from her unique relationship with Madame Rivest and the particular time/space configuration of this social relationship. The theory that helps me to understand the language of this relationship is associated with the work of critical discourse researchers who have framed their work with reference to poststructuralist theories of lan-guage.9 Poststructuralist theories of language achieved much prominence in the late twentieth century, and are associated, among others, with the work of Bakhtin (1981), Bourdieu (1977), Fairclough (1992), Gee (1990) and Kress (1989). These theories build on, but are distinct from, structuralist theories of language, associated predominantly with the work of Saussure. Saussure’s (1966) distinction between speech (parole) and language (langue) was an attempt to provide a way of recognizing that, despite geographical, inter-personal and social variations, languages have shared patterns and structure. For structuralists, the building blocks of language structure are signs that comprise the signifier (or sound-image) and the signified (the concept or meaning). Saussure asserts that neither the signifier nor the signified preex-ists the other and that the link between them is arbitrary. He notes that it is the linguistic system that guarantees the meaning of signs and that each linguistic community has its own set of signifying practices that give value to the signs in a language.One of the criticisms poststructuralists have levelled at this notion of language is that structuralism cannot account for struggles over the social meanings that can be attributed to signs in a given language. The signs Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 53/feminist/, /research/ and /SLA/, for example, can have different meanings for different people within the same linguistic community. Witness, for example, debates over the meaning of SLA theory in the field of Applied Linguistics.10 While structuralists conceive of signs as having idealized mean-ings and linguistic communities as being relatively homogeneous and con-sensual, poststructuralists take the position that the signifying practices of societies are sites of struggle, and that linguistic communities are heteroge-neous arenas characterized by conflicting claims to truth and power.Thus the theory of discourse that is central to this book represents a departure from notions of discourse (units of language larger than the sen-tence) associated with much of the traditional sociolinguistic research. In critical discourse research (Norton, 1997b), discourses are the complexes of signs and practices that organize social existence and social reproduction. The discourses of the family, the school, the church, the corporation are constituted in and by language and other sign systems. Discourses delimit the range of possible practices under their authority and organize how these practices are realized in time and space. As such, a discourse is a particular way of organizing meaning-making practices. Kress (1989, p. 7) offers a par-ticularly cogent illustration of this concept:Discourses tend towards exhaustiveness and inclusiveness; that is they attempt to account not only for an area of immediate concern to an institution, but attempt to account for increasingly wider areas of con-cern. Take as an example one discourse which determines the matter in which the biological category of sex is taken into social life as gender, the discourse of sexism. It specifies what men and women may be, how they are to think of themselves, how they are to think of and to inter-relate with the other gender. But beyond that the discourse of sexism specifies what families may be, and relations within the family: What it is to be a ‘proper father’ or a ‘mother’ and ‘the eldest son’, ‘our little girl’. It reaches into all major areas of social life, specifying what work is suitable, possible even, for men and for women; how pleasure is to be seen by either gender; what artistic possibilities if any there are for either gender. A metaphor which I use to explain the effects of dis-course to myself is that of a military power whose response to border skirmishes is to occupy the adjacent territory. As problems continue, more territory is occupied, then settled and colonised. A discourse colo-nises the social world imperialistically, from the point of view of one institution.To extend Kress’s military metaphor, it is important to note that while discourses are powerful, they are not completely determined. It is possible for people in border towns to resist the dominance of a colonising power, and to set up what Terdiman (1985) calls ‘counter-discourses’ to the 54 Ident ity and Language Learning dominant power. In this regard, as Foucault notes, power and resistance frequently coexist:It is true, it seems to me, that power is ‘always already there’, that one is never ‘outside’, that there are no ‘margins’ in which those in rupture with the system may gambol. But this does not mean that it is necessary to admit an unavoidable form of domination or an absolute privilege of the law. That one can never be ‘outside of power’ does not mean that one is in every way trapped . . . There are no relations of power without resis-tances. (Quoted in Morris & Patton, 1979, p. 55)Given a theory of language as discourse, this book, particularly in Chapter 7, will reiterate and develop concerns I have raised in Norton Peirce (1989) about the normative views on communicative competence that have dominated the field of second language education in the 1980s and 1990s. In what has become a classic framework for conceptualizing communicative competence in the field of SLA, Canale and Swain (1980) and Canale (1983) identified four characteristics of a learner’s communicative competence: grammatical competence (knowledge of the code itself); sociolinguistic com-petence (the ability to produce and understand utterances appropriately); discourse competence (the ability to combine grammatical forms into larger stretches of spoken or written discourse); and strategic competence (the mas-tery of communication strategies). I have argued (Norton Peirce, 1989, p. 406) that, while it is important for language learners to understand what Hymes (1979) calls the ‘rules of use’ of the target language, it is equally important for them to explore whose interests these rules serve. What is considered appropriate usage is not self-evident (Bourne, 1988), but must be understood with reference to inequitable relations of power between interlocutors.Turning once again to Saliha and Madame Rivest, it is instructive to con-sider whether Saliha demonstrates communicative competence in their inter-action. Clearly, Saliha has grammatical competence as her utterances are well formed. She is sociolinguistically competent in that she shows appropriate regard for the status of her interlocutor and recognizes her employer’s desire not to engage in further interaction; she is strategically competent in that she is sensitive enough to step out of the door before bidding Madame Rivest farewell, thus reassuring Madame Rivest that she will not draw her into fur-ther interaction. While it is impossible to determine whether Saliha has dis-course competence (because Madame Rivest does not allow her to respond in longer sentences), it is possible to conclude that Saliha has learnt the linguistic rules of use in this particular social interaction. However, as a language educa-tor concerned with social justice, I am not satisfied that Saliha has learnt to produce grammatically acceptable and sociolinguistically appropriate utter-ances in the target language. It is disturbing that Saliha resigns herself to Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 55what she unproblematically calls ‘reality’, rather than investigating how that reality is socially constructed. I suggest in this book that theories of commu-nicative competence should extend beyond an understanding of the appropri-ate rules of use in a particular society to include an understanding of the way rules of use are socially and historically constructed to support the interests of a dominant group within a given society.In sum, this book draws on a different set of theoretical perspectives to those commonly associated with traditional SLA research and begins with a different set of assumptions. The questions I bring to this reader include the following: What opportunities are available to second language learners to interact with target language speakers? What happens when target language speakers avoid interaction with second language speakers? Is Krashen’s (1981, 1982) notion of the affective filter adequately theorized? Are there alternative ways of theorizing motivation? Under what conditions is a lan-guage learner introverted, sensitive to rejection, inhibited? When will a lan-guage learner take risks, and why?Notes (1) For a comprehensive overview of these topics, see Tucker and Corson (1997) and Cummins and Corson (1997). (2) See H.D. Brown (1994), Gardner and Lambert (1972), Krashen (1981) and Schumann (1978b) for more detailed analyses. (3) The work of Rubin (1975) and Naiman, Frohlich, Stern and Todesco (1978) has been central in defining ‘the good language learner’ in SLA theory. Drawing on social theory and their research with adults and children respectively, Norton and Toohey (1999) have documented changing notions of the good language learner. (4) As illustrative of the range of this work, see the work of Lin (1996) in Hong Kong, Rampton (1995) in England, Kramsch (1993) and Hall (1993, 1995) in the USA, Toohey (1998, 2000) in Canada and Thesen (1997) in South Africa. (5) In my previous work (Norton Peirce, 1993, 1995), I had been drawn to theories of social identity as distinct from cultural identity. As I understood it, social identity references the relationship between the individual and the larger social world as mediated through institutions such as families, schools, workplaces, social services and law courts. I asked to what extent this relationship must be understood with reference to a person’s race, gender, class or ethnicity. Cultural identity I understood to reference the relationship between individuals and members of a group who share a common history, a common language and similar ways of understanding the world. I tended not to draw on theories of cultural identity because I debated whether such theories could do justice to the heterogeneity within the groups I had encountered over many years of research, and the dynamic and changing nature of identity I had observed. Over time, however, I have come to see the difference between social and cultural identity as more fluid, and the commonalities more marked than their differences. (6) For a comprehensive overview of such research, see Hornberger and Corson (1997), focusing in particular on the chapters by Faltis (1997), Goldstein (1997), Martin-Jones, (1997), May (1997) and Norton (1997b). (7) See Heller’s (1992) research on codeswitching and language choice in Ontario and Quebec which reveals the ways in which the regulation of access to symbolic 56 Ident ity and Language Learningresources is tied to the regulation of access to material resources. Furthermore, her research depicts how French is now set up, parallel to English, as a crucial linguistic resource in Quebec society to which relatively powerless groups, such as natives and immigrants, must aspire. (8) See for example hooks (1990), Lewis and Simon (1986), Smith (1987b), Spender, (1980). (9) See for example Corson (1993), Fairclough (1992), Gee (1990), Heller (1999), Kress (1989), Lemke (1995), Luke (1988), Norton Peirce and Stein (1995), Pennycook (1994, 1998), Simon (1992) and Wodak (1996). (10) See Beretta and Crookes (1993), Gregg (1993), Long (1993), van Lier (1994), Lantolf (1996) and Schumann (1993).Fact and Fic t ion in Language Learning 5758Researching Identity and Language LearningAll methods are ways of asking questions that presume an underlying set of assumptions, a structure of relevance, and a form of rationality.Simon and Dippo, 1986, p. 195Since critical research has a relatively recent history in the field of SLA, I have found the work of researchers in related disciplines invaluable in helping me develop a methodological framework for the study described in this book. In this chapter, I first discuss how three groups of educational researchers have influenced my work, and then outline my central research questions. I turn next to an examination of the complex relationship between researcher and researched, followed by a detailed description of the study itself.Methodological FrameworkIn investigating the relationship between identity and language learning, the questions I have asked, the data I have considered relevant and the con-clusions I have drawn have been informed by the work of educational research-ers in cultural studies, feminist research and critical ethnography. The first group of educational researchers include Connell et al. (1982), Simon (1987, 1992), Walsh (1987, 1991) and Willis (1977); the second include Briskin and Coulter (1992), Luke and Gore (1992), Schenke (1991, 1996), Smith (1987a, 1987b) and Weiler (1988, 1991); and the third include Anderson (1989), Britzman (1990), Brodkey (1987) and Simon and Dippo (1986). While these educational theorists do not always ask the same questions or share the same assumptions, I have found that the ideas they share, six of which are outlined below, highly productive for research on identity and language learning.(i) The researchers aim to investigate the complex relationship between social structure on the one hand, and human agency on the other, 2without resorting to deterministic or reductionist analyses. For exam-ple, Anderson (1989) notes that critical ethnography has grown out of dissatisfaction with social research on structures like class, patriarchy and racism in which real people never appear, and cultural interpreta-tions of human action in which broad structural constraints like class, patriarchy and racism never appear. Likewise, Weiler (1988) suggests that the specific mandate of feminist scholarship is to investigate the relationship between the individual and the social, with a particular focus on the everyday world of women. (ii) The researchers assume that in order to understand social structures we need to understand inequitable relations of power based on gender, race, class, ethnicity and sexual orientation. Walsh (1991, p. 139), for exam-ple, argues that in an unequal world, in which power relations are con-stantly at work, ‘participation and dialogue never just happen’; students are differentially positioned in relation to one another, the subject matter, and the teacher. Further, Weiler (1988) notes that while women share a gendered history, women should not be treated as a single group with no differences; questions of race and class are as important as ques-tions of gender.(iii) The researchers are interested in the way individuals make sense of their own experience. Connell et al. (1982), drawing on their landmark research in Australia, note that they wanted to get close to the situa-tions people found themselves in and to talk to them in depth about their personal experiences. Smith (1987b, p. 9) notes that what she calls an ‘institutional ethnography’ is a method of analysis that returns the researcher to the actualities of what people do on a day-to-day basis under particular conditions and in defined situations. (iv) The researchers are interested in locating their research within a histori-cal context. In this regard, Simon and Dippo (1986, p. 198) note that ‘history is not to be relegated to the collection of “background data”, but rather becomes an integral part of the explanation of the regularities explored in any specifics’. Walsh (1991) notes that the purpose of her study on the struggles of Puerto Rican students in the United States was to highlight how the past and present intersect in people’s voices and transform pedagogical conditions. Luke and Gore (1992), in a similar spirit, note that the identities that feminist academics have forged for themselves have been influenced by feminists past and present and by the extensive feminist literature of the preceding two decades. (v) The researchers reject the view that any research can claim to be objec-tive or unbiased. Weiler (1988) notes that feminist research begins with the assumption that the researcher plays a constitutive role in determin-ing the progress of a research project and that the researcher has to understand her own subjective experience and knowledge as well as that of the women she studies. Likewise, Simon and Dippo (1986) make the Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 59point that the production of knowledge cannot be understood apart from the personal histories of the researchers and the larger institutional context in which researchers work. They suggest that critical ethno-graphic work should define data and analytic procedures in a way con-sistent with its pedagogical and political project.(vi) The researchers believe that the goal of educational research is social and educational change. Brodkey (1987) for example, makes the point that the goal of critical ethnography is to help create the possibility of trans-forming such institutions as schools. Briskin and Coulter (1992) note that feminist pedagogy is situated firmly within the discourse on pro-gressive education and critical pedagogy, while Simon’s work, and that of his colleagues, is centrally concerned with what schools can do to address inequities in educational and social institutions (Simon et al., 1992).Central QuestionsIn my own study with immigrant language learners in Canada, I sought to investigate the relationship of learners to the larger social world, without resorting to oversimplication. I frequently asked how questions of gender, race, class and ethnicity were central to the analysis. I sought to investigate how the learners made sense of their experiences and to what extent their particular historical memories intersected with their investment in language learning. Through these enquiries I recognized increasingly that my own history and experiences structured the study in diverse and complex ways. The questions addressed in this book can be collapsed into two broad sets of questions. (i) Since interaction with target language speakers is a desirable condition for adult SLA, what opportunities for interaction exist outside the classroom? How is this interaction socially structured? How do learners act upon these structures to create, use or resist opportunities to speak? To what extent should their actions be understood with reference to their investment in the target language and their changing identities across time and space? (ii) How can an enhanced understanding of identity and natural language learning inform both SLA theory and classroom practice?The Researcher and the ResearchedHaving established a methodological framework for my research, I needed to consider the kind of relationship I wished to establish with the participants in my research, a topic of increasing interest and concern in the social sciences. In this regard, the work of Cameron et al. (1992) is particu-larly helpful. Drawing on their research, primarily conducted in England, 60 Ident ity and Language LearningCameron et al. distinguish three positions that researchers may take up in relation to their subjects, defined respectively as ethical, advocacy and empowerment research. In ethical research, they argue, there is an appropri-ate concern that subjects do not suffer damage or inconvenience while par-ticipating in the research, and that the contributions of subjects are adequately acknowledged. They characterize such research as research on social subjects. Advocacy research, in contrast, is characterised by a commit-ment on the part of the researcher to do research for subjects as well as on subjects. In this regard, researchers might be asked to use their skills to defend the interests of subjects and to advocate on their behalf.While ethics and advocacy, Cameron et al. argue, are associated with positivist assumptions about research, empowerment presupposes a more radical research project. It is characterized by research that is on, for and with subjects, as Cameron et al. (1992, p. 22) explain:One of the things we take that additional ‘with’ to imply is the use of interactive or dialogic research methods, as opposed to the distancing or objectifying strategies positivists are constrained to use. It is the central-ity of interaction ‘with’ the researched that enables research to be empowering in our sense; though we understand this is as a necessary rather than sufficient condition.In making the case for empowering research, Cameron et al. (1992) argue that three tenets should be observed: (i) Persons are not objects and should not be treated as objects. The central point here is that the researcher’s goals, assumptions and procedures should be made explicit, and that research methods should be open, interactive and dialogic. They argue further that interaction can enhance research, and that claims for non-intervention as a guarantee of objectivity and validity are ‘philosophically naive’ (p. 23). (ii) Subjects have their own agendas and research should try to address them. Cameron et al. make the point that, if a researcher is working with subjects, it follows that asking questions and introducing topics should not be the sole prerogative of the researcher. Indeed, helping subjects to address their own agendas may generate new insights and enhance the project as a whole. (iii) If knowledge is worth having, it is worth sharing. As Cameron et al. suggest, this is a particularly challenging tenet, since it begs the questions, ‘what is knowledge?’ and ‘how do we share?’ They conclude that each research proj-ect offers different opportunities for interaction with subjects on the find-ings of the research, acknowledging that divergent interpretations by researchers and subjects may arise. In research with adult immigrants, researchers need to be particularly cognizant of the unequal relationship between researcher and researched since such subjects, new to a society, have few institutional protections and are frequently vulnerable and isolated. I did not want to do what Rist (1980) calls blitzkrieg ethnography by taking a brief Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 61look at a few language learners, collecting a handful of anecdotes and writing up decontextualized stories. Such an approach to ethnography is one that is being increasingly questioned by scholars such as Watson Gegeo (1988). How I sought to develop both an ethical and empowering relationship with my participants is discussed in the next section.The ProjectAs I embarked on my study, I immediately faced three challenges. First, I wanted to work with participants over an extended period so that I could examine to what extent language learning experiences changed over time; second, I needed a methodology adequate to the task of exploring complex and intimate experiences in a language that had not yet been mastered by the participants; third, I hoped to work with participants who had only recently arrived in Canada and were in the initial stages of language learning. This stage places the greatest demands on the immigrant to learn the second language and cultural practices of the new society. Such cultural practices, as Willis (1977) notes, cannot be specified in mechanical or structural terms, but in terms of distinctive kinds of relationships that are often in flux. The way I approached my research project and addressed these challenges are best described in the form of a chronology that spans a period of two years. It will be evident in this overview that, in doing the study, which was qualitative in nature, I utilized what Wolcott (1994) describes as the three classic modes that qualitative researchers use to gather data: interviewing, the analysis of documentation and participant observation. From January to June 1990, I helped to teach a full-time ESL course to recent immigrants in Ontario, Canada, which gave me access to a highly diverse and interesting group of language learners. In the second six months of that year, I invited the learn-ers in this course to be part of the research, developed a detailed question-naire for them to complete, and began initial interviews with the five women who agreed to participate in the three parts of the study. From January to June 1991, I conducted a diary study with the women, and thereafter (July to December 1991) did follow-up interviews and a second questionnaire. The sections below describe the two-year process in greater detail, highlighting how I sought to capture the relationship between identity and language learning.January to June 1990: The ESL courseMy first challenge was to find participants who were willing and able to take part in a long-term project. In most immigrant language training pro-grammes in Canada, a teacher has access to learners for only a short period of time after the immigrant learner’s arrival in Canada. If an immigrant is 62 Ident ity and Language Learningfortunate to be placed in a subsidized Employment and Immigration Canada (EIC) language training program, the teacher has access to learners for a maximum of six months,1 thereafter, access to learners becomes increasingly difficult. Even in this six-month period, communication with learners may be particularly difficult if the teacher has no common language with the learners and the learners have only a limited command of English. Nevertheless, a course of this nature was the best means of gaining access to recently arrived language learners who were all living in relatively close prox-imity to one another. In January 1990, I was given the opportunity to par-ticipate part-time in an EIC language training program run by a community college, called Ontario College, in the town of Newtown in Ontario. My job was to teach the course one full day a week, in conjunction with the full-time instructor who taught the course for the remaining four days a week.The ESL course was highly structured, and the learners were given a thorough introduction to English grammar and pronunciation. The full-time teacher was energetic and meticulous. As a team teacher once a week, I was asked to complement and reinforce what the students had learnt during the remainder of the week, but I was also encouraged to be innovative and to introduce my own materials into the classroom. At the conclusion of the six-month course, I told the learners that I was about to embark on a long-term project on the second language learning of adult immigrants. I informed them that they would each be invited to participate in the project, and that details of the project would be sent to them before the end of the year. At this point in the study, I did not know who might be willing to participate in the study, although a number did express considerable interest. I inter-viewed and tape-recorded each student about his or her plans for the follow-ing six months and asked them all to write a short essay on the following topic: ‘Some people think that Canada is “a good country for immigrants”. Do you think that this is true? Please explain.’ I had chosen this topic with care because I wanted to gain some insight into the experience that these learners had had as immigrants in Canada. I knew that, when I used the topic in the study, I could gain insight into the learners’ changing perceptions of immigrant life in Canada. In addition, by using the same topic, I would have the opportunity to determine to what extent their writing ability had developed over time. The same essay was written by participants in January 1991 (before the diary study began) and in December 1991, when the research project was completed.July to October 1990: First questionnaireThe development of a detailed questionnaire aimed to secure informa-tion from each participant about the following areas: biographical informa-tion, language background, immigration information, accommodation, work experience, the English language course, language contacts, the extent of Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 63English usage, self-assessment of English progress, comfort levels in using English, the learning process and the students’ perception of the relationship between language and culture.2 All this information I believed would be useful in helping me to understand the respective histories of the partici-pants, their particular social circumstances in Canada, and their progress in language learning. In the questionnaire, I asked the participants how they had found out about the EIC course, how much English they had learnt in the course and which specific skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing) had been developed, which activities (from the list provided in the question-naire) they found most helpful in learning English, and how the course might be changed to facilitate learning. When developing this questionnaire, I was aware that some of the language might present a problem to the par-ticipants. I therefore pretested the questionnaire on advanced ESL learners as well as recent immigrants with limited command of English. On the basis of their recommendations, I modified the questions to ensure they would be as unambiguous as possible. For example, I revised the expressions strongly agree, agree, disagree and strongly disagree to the terms YES!, yes, no, NO! I used a variety of question types, including multiple-choice questions, fill-in-the-blanks, lists and open-ended questions. In the section on language and culture, I invited the participants to use their mother tongue if they chose to.In November 1990, I distributed an information package to each of the students at a reunion of the ESL course, inviting them to participate in the study. The reunion was held at the home of the teacher who had taught the students full time. The reunion was not linked formally to the research project, although the full-time teacher had indicated to the learners that I wished to take the opportunity to invite their participation in a research study. The information package contained a letter which included a consent form, the questionnaire described above and a stamped, self-addressed envelope in which the participants could place their completed questionnaires. In the letter I indicated that the three parts of the study included a questionnaire, a personal interview and a diary study. The diary study was described as follows:I would like to understand exactly how, when and where you use English; who you speak English to; what happens when you speak English. The best way to examine this is to ask you to keep a diary (a notebook) in which you regularly make comments about your experiences in learning English. I know that keeping a diary can take a lot of time. For this reason, there will be no rules about what you should write in your diaries or how much you should write. This will depend on what you are inter-ested in and how much time you have. I hope that the project will run for 8 weeks. In addition, I think it will be useful for the people in the project to get together once a week or once every two weeks while the project is in progress. This will give you time to discuss the comments 64 Ident ity and Language Learningyou have made in your diaries. I hope it will also give you the chance to improve your writing and speaking skills. We can meet at my house, which is in a convenient place for many of you. In addition, if you would like to meet individually at another place, this can be arranged. This part of the project will begin in the middle of January 1991.Fourteen (eight women and six men) of the sixteen students completed the questionnaire, twelve agreed to be interviewed (seven women and five men), and five women agreed to participate in the diary study. Because the diary study was to be a major source of data, I decided at that point to focus my data analysis on the five women who agreed to be part of the diary study: Eva and Katarina from Poland, Mai from Vietnam, Martina from Czechoslovakia and Felicia from Peru. This approach provided an important focus for my data analysis and gave me the opportunity to concentrate my attention on a subset of language learners whose experience, Ng (1981) argues, has been largely unaccounted for because of their silence.It is difficult to determine with confidence how the five women who chose to take part in the diary study differed from the other students in the ESL course, both male and female. It is possible, however, that the self-selection process could be understood in gendered terms. What distinguished the diary study from the other two parts of the study was the intimacy of the project as well as the time commitment involved. It is possible that the women in the course were more attracted to the writing of a diary on per-sonal experience than the men were, an observation that is supported by much feminist research.3 bell hooks (1990, p. 338), for example, describes how writing is paradoxically both a form of resistance and a form of submis-sion for women who have few means to make their voices heard:Writing was a way to capture speech, to hold onto it, to keep it close. And so I wrote down bits and pieces of conversations, confessing in cheap diaries that soon fell apart from too much handling, expressing the inten-sity of my sorrow, the anguish of speech – for I was always saying the wrong thing, asking the wrong questions. I could not confine my speech to the necessary corners and concerns of my life.With reference to the time commitment involved in the diary study, the women who volunteered for the diary study had generally fewer demands on their time than the remainder of the women in the ESL course. The vol-unteers fell into two categories – they were either working or studying part-time and had school-age children (Katarina, Martina, Felicia) or they were working full-time outside the home but had no children (Eva, Mai). The remaining four women in the course were either mothers in full-time paid employment or mothers of pre-school children, working full-time in the home. In their interviews and telephone calls to me, they indicated that their Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 65‘double days’ gave them little opportunity to participate in other recreational or educational activities. They took on the responsibility for most of the domestic work in the home, as well as undertaking full-time paid employ-ment or full-time child care responsibilities respectively. Access to this diary study then, and the symbolic resources it provided, must itself be understood with reference to patriarchal relations which structure double days for many women. Further, although the women who took part in the study may have appeared privileged relative to other immigrant women, they were privileged only in so far as their desires were not in open conflict with larger patriarchal structures. If the circumstances of their gendered lives changed, so too did their opportunities to learn English. As a particularly telling example of this, I note the case of Mai, who changed her status from single to married within a few years of her arrival in Canada. As I indicate in Chapter 4, at the time of her wedding, Mai was already expressing concerns that her opportunities to learn English would be limited once she was married. She indicated that her opportunities depended on the wishes of her husband and the extent to which he would let her study and work in the public world.December 1990 to January 1991: Initial interviewsThe initial interviews took place in the homes of the women, in December 1990 and January 1991, and lasted between 45 minutes and 3 hours. The interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed. In these inter-views, I asked the women to clarify comments they had made in their ques-tionnaires, and to respond to questions they had left unanswered. I also discussed the diary study with them, and explained what I hoped to learn from the project. I indicated that I hoped to be able to use the diary study to gain greater insight into their language learning experiences on a day-to-day basis, and the extent to which such experiences change over time and place. I also indicated to them that I hoped the diary study would provide some opportunity for them to get more experience in writing English, and in speaking it in our diary study meetings. All five women wished to make use of the opportunities that the project offered. During the initial interviews I also had the opportunity to gain some familiarity with the domestic lives of the women, as well as their immediate neighborhoods, more details of which will be given in Chapters 3 through 5. I was introduced to their partners and their children, and had the opportunity to talk informally to members of the family during the course of the visits. In Mai and Katarina’s homes I was taken through family photograph albums of past and recent events in their lives. In Felicia’s home I was shown the beautiful furniture that the family had brought with them from Peru, and which had been damaged as a result of the change in climate. I was generously offered refreshments at the home of each of the women, from espresso and cake at Eva’s home to Chinese tea and cookies at Mai’s.66 Ident ity and Language LearningJanuary to June 1991: Diary studyFrom January to June 1991, I had the opportunity to return the hospital-ity of the five women at my house for the duration of the diary study. As far as transportation was concerned, Felicia had access to a car; Eva, Katarina and Martina were driven to my house by Martina’s husband, while I gave them a ride home; Mai was picked up and dropped off by me. The initial meetings were scheduled as a weekly event for a total of eight weeks. The sessions took place in the evening – Friday nights and Sunday nights were considered the most suitable – and lasted approximately three hours. While our first meeting was held in the kitchen around a large kitchen table, our subsequent meetings took place in the living room where the chairs were more comfortable and the setting more intimate. After eight weekly meet-ings were over, I faced a delicate situation. On the one hand, I wanted to continue with the study, but didn’t want any of the women to feel obliged to continue with the meetings, particularly since my letter of invitation had indicated that we would be meeting for eight weeks. I wanted to be sure that any of the participants could comfortably leave the group without feeling that they had let the group down. On the other hand, I didn’t want the women to interpret my tentative attempts at closure as a summary gesture on my part to bring our meetings to a premature end. I decided at the end of eight weeks to simply thank the women for participating in the study, and indicated that, if anybody was interested in continuing with the meetings, I would be happy to join them. There was general consensus that the meetings should continue, but that we should schedule the meetings on a monthly basis. We thus met once a month for the next three months, making a total of 12 group meetings between January and June 1991.Establishing a venue, schedule and transportation for the diary study proved a great deal simpler than deciding on a format for the diaries them-selves. In the field of SLA research, a number of researchers have made use of diary studies to explore the process of second language learning. However, with the exception of Yu (1990), such studies4 were introspective accounts of the learning of a foreign language: None of the diarists in question was learn-ing the language for the purposes of remaining in the target language coun-try for an extended period of time. Furthermore, all of the accounts except that of Yu (1990) were written in the mother tongue, and all but Brown’s (1984) research involved the use of diaries by the researchers themselves in the process of language learning. Brown’s study required participants, who were studying Spanish in an intensive formal program in the United States, to spend 15 minutes a day writing entries in their journals about their lan-guage learning experiences. Most of the entries referenced by Brown dealt with student responses to formal aspects of grammar teaching and the scheduling of the classes, though there were some hints of resistance by some students at being required to perform this duty. My diary study had a very Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 67different purpose as it invited participants to reflect on their language learn-ing experiences, not only in the classroom, but in the home, the workplace and the community. The emphasis of the diary study was on what partici-pants thought, felt and did, in response to different language learning situa-tions and different encounters with speakers of the target language. The participants were encouraged to write as much and as often as they chose to. In addition, there was consensus that the diaries should be written in English, the target language, rather than the mother tongue. Although I had asked the women if they would prefer to use their mother tongues for their diaries, which would then be translated, they were adamant that they wanted practice writing in English, as well as regular feedback on their writ-ing progress. In addition, they indicated that a translation of their diaries would not accurately reflect what they were trying to say. Furthermore, the participants were encouraged to share extracts from their diaries at our diary study meetings, so that the audience for their writing included other partici-pants as well as me. I hoped that the opportunity to write for an authentic and interested audience would be a desirable feature for the participants in the study. Zamel (1987, p. 707) has written at length about research on the social context of writing development:This research has revealed what can happen to students when they are acknowledged, given numerous opportunities to write, and become par-ticipants in a community of writers. In classrooms in which risk taking is encouraged, trust is established, choice and authority are shared, and writing is viewed as a meaning-making event, students change as writ-ers, adopt positive attitudes toward written work and demonstrate real growth in writing performance.Although all the women had asked me what was expected of them in the diaries, I did not want to prescribe a right or wrong way of approaching the task. However, given my own research questions, I did wish to provide some guidance as to how they might proceed. I did this by articulating my objec-tives in written form and by responding to the diary entries that the women made. First, at the initial diary study meeting, I gave the women an introduc-tory letter which outlined my interest in the project, and provided each woman with a chart on which she could record day-to-day activities that were conducted in English. I indicated that the chart might provide a start-ing point for further reflections which could be recorded in the diaries. (A new chart was given to each woman at each meeting.) After we had dis-cussed the contents of the letter, I asked the women to consider under what conditions they had used English in the course of that particular day. Martina volunteered to share her experiences, focusing on her experiences of attend-ing Church, listening to the sermon and singing hymns in English. She dis-cussed how strange it was to perform such intimate functions in a second 68 Ident ity and Language Learninglanguage. I used her discussion as an example of how the diary entries might be made, and I elaborated on this discussion in my letters to the participants in the subsequent two weeks. Second, I gave the women regular feedback on their diary entries. Sometimes I asked them to clarify or expand on issues that had been raised. For example, one of my comments to Katarina was as follows: ‘Very interesting, Katarina! It would be nice to know more about some of the conversations you mention. For example, how did you find out about the Community Services job? Could you give more details about the interview? Who did most of the talking? What precisely did you talk about?’ Similarly, a comment to Eva read as follows: ‘Very interesting Eva! Please explain why you feel better when you don’t have to do the heavy jobs and why this makes you want to talk more.’ However, my comments did not only request clarification or amplification. I would often give words of com-fort and support such as those I gave Mai: ‘You’re doing a FANTASTIC job, Mai! Don’t let your brother tell you otherwise!’ I would also comment on the quality of the women’s writing. For example, to Felicia I said ‘Very nicely written’ and to Martina, ‘Very clear and easy to understand, Martina.’ There were times when I would ask the women to give me feedback on my com-ments. For example, a note to Mai was as follows: ‘Your comments are very interesting, Mai. Is it useful for me to correct your writing as much as I have? Let me know.’Within two to three weeks, each woman had developed a method of com-munication with which she felt most comfortable. Mai and Martina were the most prolific writers in the group and wrote long, detailed entries on a broad range of topics. Eva said that she liked to respond to questions that I had asked, and did not like to sit down and write without having something spe-cific to say. Felicia enjoyed writing, but did not attend the meetings as regu-larly as the other women did. Katarina didn’t write very much, though we did talk on the phone a number of times during the course of the study. In some respects, defining my own relationship to the women was even more complex than helping the women develop a format for their diaries. I wanted to create a supportive and intimate environment in which the women would feel suf-ficiently comfortable to discuss their desires, fears, joys and frustrations. This was one of the main reasons why the meetings were held in my home. I hoped that my home, as a private sphere, would facilitate the expression and analysis of personal and private experiences. At one level, I wanted the women to relate to me as another woman, functioning as a mother, wife and home-maker. I did not want my role as researcher to dominate my relationship with the women as I thought this might create too much distance between us. It was for this reason that I did not use a tape recorder at our meetings; I already had sufficient experience with the use of a tape recorder to know that some of the women felt uncomfortable discussing personal issues in their lives in the presence of a tape recorder. However, I occasionally took notes at the meetings when I wanted to remember direct quotes from the women.Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 69Although I wished to avoid relating to the women as a ‘teacher’ within the context of the diary study, it was a relationship that could not easily be displaced since our initial relationship had been structured in an educational setting. Furthermore, I understood that one of the reasons why the women took part in the study was to take the opportunity to improve their oral and written English in a supportive environment. For this reason, I encouraged the women to read some of their diary entries to the group each week. This gave them the opportunity to develop their oral skills, and it gave the group the opportunity to examine and discuss the issues that had been raised. Sometimes, during the course of our meetings, I would discuss vocabulary and grammar issues with the women when they asked me for comments or when they were struggling to express themselves. I also attempted to make suggestions as to how they might improve their written expression. Correcting the women’s work also gave me the opportunity to comment on what had been said in the diaries and to ask for clarification. As indicated above, my comments played an important part in influencing the direction that the diary entries took.I do not know how well I succeeded in maintaining a balance between my diverse positions as friend, teacher and researcher. I wanted to apologize on those rare occasions when I corrected the women’s pronunciation – even though I knew that pronunciation training was what they had requested. Sometimes, when I picked up my notepad in a meeting to record a comment that a woman had made, I almost felt as though I was undermining a friend-ship, betraying a confidence. I sometimes felt that my comments on the women’s writing of their intimate and often unsettling stories were hope-lessly inadequate. I found myself trying to compensate for what Britzman (1990) calls guilty readings by helping the women to find employment, write résumés, provide references and deal with immigration officials. In retro-spect it is highly ironic that I should try to reconcile my multiple relation-ships to the women or attempt to resolve the conflicting tensions of being friend, teacher and researcher in our diary study meetings. I was simultane-ously exploring the complexity of identity while trying to maintain an unambivalent relationship to each woman. It was a misplaced endeavor. Not all the women attended all the meetings and, as indicated above, some dia-ries were more detailed than others. However, the discussions that arose from the extracts that the women chose to read to the group were a rich complement to the written diary entries. During the course of the study, I also kept a journal of my reflections. My analysis of the diary entries and the subsequent discussions are the most important source of data for the study.July to December 1991: Final interviews and questionnaireIn December 1991, six months after the diary study was completed, I had follow-up interviews with each of the women. At this time, the women 70 Ident ity and Language Learningrewrote the essay on immigration that they had written twice before – once at the end of the six-month ESL course in June 1990, and once at the begin-ning of the diary study in January 1991. I wanted to see whether the wom-en’s perceptions of immigration had changed over the 18-month period. I also took the opportunity to demonstrate to the women how much prog-ress they had made in writing English over the course of two years. Furthermore, in December 1991, I developed another brief questionnaire that explored a few of the questions that had been asked in the first question-naire. The purpose of this questionnaire was to investigate whether the par-ticipants’ views on certain crucial issues had changed in the intervening period. The questions I was most interested in concerned the women’s per-ceptions of what had helped them the most to learn English, under what conditions they felt comfortable or uncomfortable speaking English, and to what extent they still felt like immigrants in Canada. All the women except Eva completed this questionnaire in December 1991, while Eva, who was undergoing much change in her personal life, completed it in April 1992.Data OrganizationAfter working on the project for two years and actively collecting and recording data for twelve months, I had accumulated hundreds of pages of data. I had data from the women’s diaries, data from my own journal, data from individual interviews (which had been transcribed), data from the two questionnaires and data from the written essays. My next task was to orga-nize these data in a way that would help me to understand the relationship between identity and language learning. As Wolcott (1994) suggests, a major challenge for qualitative researchers is not how to get data, but how to decide what to do with the data they get. The three ways in which he suggests data can be presented are defined as descriptive, analytical and interpretive, respectively. My study, and the presentation of data in this book, draws to a greater or lesser extent on all three presentation formats. To a lesser extent, in the voices of the women, the data speak for themselves; to some extent, an analysis proceeds from systematic comparisons and contrasts among the data, and to a greater extent I have sought to reach for understanding and explanation that goes beyond a limited conception of analysis. Thus organiz-ing data is a theoretical task. On what basis would I choose which data to use, which issues to focus on, which stories to tell?The first approach I took was to organize each individual woman’s data into one composite file. There was a separate file for Eva, for Mai, for Felicia, for Katarina and for Martina. Each woman’s file included the questionnaires, the essays, the diary entries (which had all been typed) and transcripts of the interviews. In order to help me focus on different parts of the data, I began to cross-collate the data. The first cross-collation of data was made on the Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 71basis of the different sites in which the women had the opportunity to prac-tice English. I focused on the home, the workplace and the school respec-tively. I went through each woman’s file, categorizing data that pertained to her use of English in each of these sites. I then collated these in the form of chapters on the home, workplace and school, respectively focusing on changes in the women’s experiences across time. This approach helped me to understand the way language practices are structured within a particular social site, and how institutional relations of power in the home, workplace and school, respectively, offer different kinds of opportunities for as well as constraints on the practice of the target language. However, in adopting this approach, I tended to lose sight of the composite language learning experi-ences of each of the women across the different domains of her life. For example, I was not able to address in a satisfying way how a particular wom-an’s investment in English and practice of English in the workplace inter-sected with her investment in English and practice of English in her home. Thus, although I could capture aspects of identity and language learning across historical time, I could not capture it across social space.I then decided to write up a comprehensive chapter on each woman, one which would allow me to make cross-references across both historical time and social space. While completing this exercise, I looked for data that would help me to understand how the position of these language learners as female immigrants influenced their access to and practice of English. This was a very valuable exercise in that it gave me a comprehensive picture of each of my participants, and insight into their experiences as immigrant women in Canada. However, the chapters began to read like anecdotal narratives in which all observations became idiosyncratic. Under these conditions, while I could capture the complexities of individual experience, it was difficult to link individual experience to larger social structures. My next strategy was to categorize all the data that pertained to everyday experiences implicated in the production of gender and ethnicity. I wrote up a chapter on each of these issues respectively, drawing comparisons across participants. This was a valuable exercise in that it gave me the opportunity to examine how gen-dered and ethnic identities are structured across time and space, and how opportunities to practice English must be understood within this context. What was particularly interesting is that I found myself making compari-sons and contrasts between the two younger participants in the study, Eva and Mai, and the three older participants, Katarina, Martina and Felicia. It became clear that the older women had very different investments in English from Eva and Mai because they had been professionally and domestically well established in their native countries prior to immigration and had arrived in Canada with children and spouses. The accumulated memories of their private and public lives in their native countries and their positions within their respective families had an important influence on the way they understood their relationship to the public world in Canada. This in turn 72 Ident ity and Language Learninginfluenced how they created, responded to and resisted opportunities to speak English.While the focus on the production of gendered and ethnic identities was valuable, the limitation of this approach was that many language learning issues centered on the production of both gender and ethnicity. I found that at times making distinctions between gender and ethnicity became an artificial activity that oversimplified the discussion at hand. Indeed, as Lorde (1990) notes, to deal with one without dealing with the other is a distortion. Furthermore, as Ng (1987) notes, questions of gender and ethnicity are integral constituents in the organization of class relations and should not be abstracted from the larger social relations in which they arise: ‘The fact that we can think of ethnicity and gender as separate social phenomena is itself a product of our kind of society which introduces an artificial separation between economic and social life’ (p. 14). It was at this stage in the preparation of my data that I decided to organize the analysis by comparing and contrasting the experiences of the two younger women, Eva and Mai, with those of the three older women, Katarina, Martina and Felicia. This approach gave me the opportunity to investigate how the language learning experiences of the younger, single women who had not yet established themselves professionally compared with those of the older, married women who arrived in Canada with well- established professional histories. As well, the approach enabled me to investi-gate how opportunities to practice English are socially structured across space (the home and workplace) and across time (a period of 12 months).5 Furthermore, by comparing the experiences of only two or three participants at a time, I hoped to do justice to the individual histories and changing identities of each of the women, while still being able to make interesting comparisons within and across the sets of data. While the European Science Foundation Project undertaken in Europe in the 1980s (Perdue, 1984, 1993a, 1993b) will be dis-cussed in greater detail in the next chapter, it is interesting to note that using age as a principle of organization in my data was, to some extent, consistent with one of their central findings. As Perdue (1993b) notes:In a comparison of the lexical richness scores, it was found that learners in a position to benefit from everyday contacts acquired faster and more successfully. Propensity to benefit from contact could be defined: the learner who is younger, more educated in the source country, not married to a compatriot and with no children is likely to benefit from contact, at least as measured by vocabulary richness scores. (p. 264)CommentIt is important to note that, while this study was not focused on literacy as such, it is informed by and may lend insight to recent research on literacy Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 73as a social practice. Such research is associated with scholars such as Barton and Hamilton (1998), Mitchell and Weiler (1991), Solsken (1993) and the New London Group (1996). As Barton and Hamilton (1998) note:The notion of literacy practices offers a powerful way of conceptualising the link between the activities of reading and writing and the social structures in which they are embedded and which they help shape. When we talk about practices, then, this is not just the superficial choice of a word but the possibilities that this perspective offers for new theoretical understandings about literacy. (p. 6)What is particularly important for my study is Barton and Hamilton’s find-ing, based on their research in Lancaster, England, that literacy practices, among other purposes, were regularly used to assert or create identity. They note the case of Harry, who had begun to write his life history as a way of asserting a sense of time and place, and June, Terry and Mumtaz, who docu-mented their lives through photographs. The lengthy diary entries of Mai and Martina are reminiscent of Harry’s literacy practices, while June, Terry and Mumtaz’s investment in photographs mirrored the many occasions I pored over volumes of photographs in Mai’s and Katarina’s homes. The fol-lowing observation by Barton and Hamilton (1998) speaks eloquently to the literacy practices that were central to my study:People’s interest in documenting their lives very often extended beyond their own life, and was part of a process of situating themselves within the wider context of family, cultural group, nation and even world his-tory. In the case of minority cultural groups, or those who have been displaced, this can create a sense of identity. (p. 241)In Chapter 3, I provide a preliminary introduction to each of the five women, locating their stories in the context of other research on immigrant language learners, in general, and immigrant women in particular. In Chapter 4, I focus in greater depth on the stories of the two younger women, and in Chapter 5 on the stories of the three older women.Notes(1) This program, currently under review, is now referred to as LINC: Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada.(2) The questionnaire has many similarities with the information elicited from par-ticipants in the European Science Foundation project (see Perdue, 1984, pp. 268–74).(3) See Van Daele (1990) for a comprehensive examination of this issue.(4) See for example Bailey (1980, 1983), Bell (1991), C. Brown (1984); Cooke (1986); F. Schumann (1980); Schumann and Schumann (1977).74 Ident ity and Language Learning(5) Note that while Chapters 3, 4 and 5 address the home and the workplace as sites of language learning, Chapter 7 addresses the language learning experiences of the women in the formal context of the school. Note further that in investigating how opportunities to practice English are socially structured across time, I need to draw on the participants’ memories of language learning prior to the timing of the research project.Researching Ident ity and Language Learning 7576The World of Adult Immigrant Language LearnersIn the ESF project, most studies of understanding have been linked to an awareness of, and concern for, the paradoxical situation that these learners have to cope with, namely, that they have to learn in order to communicate, whilst communicating in order to learn – and this in a racist society.Bremer, Broeder, Roberts, Simonot and Vasseur, 1993, p. 154The International ContextIn his research on the development of community languages in Australia, Clyne (1991) describes patterns of immigration to Australia, in which migrants have sought to escape unjust or unstable social orders in Europe, Asia and South America. The waves of immigration coincide with key events in world history in the twentieth century, in which migrants and refugees from the Russian revolution (1917), the Second World War (1939–45), Soviet intervention in Hungary (1956), anti-Allende (1970) and pro-Allende (1973) forces in Chile, and ethnic Chinese from Vietnam and Cambodia (1975) entered Australia. Such massive displacements of people, not only to Australia but to other parts of the world, were commonplace in the twentieth century. A recent fallout from political instability was high-lighted in the Vancouver Sun, in Canada, on 6 May 1999, which declared in bold headlines: ‘900 refugees from Kosovo expected to come to B.C.’ Increases in international migration have precipitated a major new study, the International Metropolis Project, begun in 1995 and including over twenty countries from different parts of the globe.1 The purpose of the Metropolis project is to examine the effects of immigration, especially on cities, and the extent to which government and non-government intervention has helped to facilitate the integration of immigrants into their new countries.Researchers and teachers in the field of SLA come face to face with adults migrating from one country to another, many of whom are struggling with the challenge of learning the language of their new country. As a result, there 3is a growing body of research that addresses the provision of formal second language instruction for adult immigrants, including perspectives from community-based programs, workplace training, postsecondary education and family literacy programs.2 A recent special issue of Prospect, published in 1998, for example, documents the challenges and successes of the Australian Migrant English Program, while a comprehensive collection of articles, edited by Smoke (1998), examines the relationship between politics and pedagogy in the North American adult ESL context. Research on the natural language learning of adult immigrants is, however, less prolific than research on formal language learning. Johnson (1992) indicates that there has been sur-prisingly little research on the language learning of adults within a sociocul-tural context, an area of investigation which, she says, merits more attention than it has received. Indeed, most of the much-cited literature that addresses natural second language learning of adult immigrants, such as that of Acton and de Felix (1986) and Clarke (1976) is based on speculation. Klein (1986), argues thus:Until a few years ago, spontaneous language acquisition remained a side issue in research; even today the bulk of second language investigations are addressed to guided learning. Moreover, students of spontaneous learning are chiefly preoccupied with child second language acquisition; very few of them deal with spontaneous learning in adults, or at an age when the first language is fully established. (p. 18)As Klein notes, an obvious reason for the paucity of research on the natural language learning of adults is the accessibility of data: It is easier to conduct SLA research in the formal language classroom than the informal world out-side it. Notwithstanding this bleak picture, however, there are a number of research projects on the natural language learning of adult immigrants that have received greater or lesser attention in the mainstream SLA literature. One such study was conducted at Harvard University in the USA in the 1970s and another, the European Science Foundation project, was conducted in five European countries in the 1980s. At approximately the same time, there was also a large-scale community ESL literacy study of Hispanic immi-grant women in the USA that has received little attention in mainstream SLA research. While the Harvard study will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 6, I will draw on the latter two studies to highlight important aspects of my study with immigrant women.The European Science Foundation studyOne of the most ambitious longitudinal studies on the SLA process of adults under conditions of immigration was conducted by the European Science Foundation (ESF) in the mid-1980s. A description of the study The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 77first appeared in 1984 (Perdue, 1984), with more recent description and anal-ysis available in two volumes (Perdue 1993a, 1993b). As well, a particularly interesting aspect of the study on achieving understanding in intercultural encounters is addressed in a book by Bremer, Roberts, Vasseur, Simonot and Broeder (1996). The design of the research was to conduct a five-country, five-year coordinated comparative study of the spontaneous acquisition of a second language by adult immigrant workers. The study included five target languages, six mother tongues and ten interlanguages. The primary purpose of the study was to investigate the widespread existence of fossilized inter-languages and the processes and determining factors of second language acquisition. Most of the data analysis was based on 26 informants learning English, German, Dutch, French or Swedish. Data was collected through a mix of experimental tasks and naturally occurring or role-played and simu-lated interactions over a two-and-a-half-year period.One of the important characteristics of the ESF Project was its focus on the larger social and political context in which language learners and target language speakers interact. Among other issues, it noted that adult immi-grants are frequently subject to discrimination, which has a significant impact on social interaction. In addition, it addressed the fact that misunder-standings between target language speakers and language learners can occur because of different culture-specific assumptions about the way social inter-action should proceed at both a verbal and nonverbal level. Thus, while the ESF project had three major questions, the one of particular relevance to this book is as follows: What are the characteristics of communication between native and non-native speakers of a language? This question was the central focus of the report written by Bremer, Broeder, Roberts, Simonot and Vasseur (1993) at the conclusion of the ESF project, and formed the foundation of the book described above.The insights and findings from Bremer et al. (1993, 1996) are extensive, but two are particularly noteworthy. First, Bremer et al. propose a different conception of understanding than that associated with traditional SLA research. In contrast to studies which conceive of understanding as the pur-view of research on listening and reading, they argue that understanding is an active rather than passive skill, co-constructed by both learners and target language speakers (Bremer et al., 1993, p. 153). They demonstrate that, if both parties actively participate in the negotiation of meaning, language learning is enhanced. They note, however, that in most inter-ethnic encoun-ters, it is the learner who is expected to work to understand the native speaker, rather than the native speaker ensuring that the learner understand. Further, they make a useful distinction between a misunderstanding, in which both parties may be unaware that a difficulty has occurred, and a lack of understanding, which becomes more immediately apparent in an interaction. Second, Bremer et al. are centrally concerned with the paradoxical situation that adult immigrant language learners face in that they have to learn in 78 Ident ity and Language Learningorder to communicate, and to communicate in order to learn – frequently under difficult sociocultural conditions. By extension, they argue that learn-ers face the paradox that learning to behave appropriately in interaction can only be learnt through participation, but that the learner is likely to be assessed according to the way she participates. While such a Catch-22 situa-tion can be alleviated with sustained contact with the majority community, they make the argument that opportunities for learning are frequently lim-ited to bureaucratic and gate-keeping encounters in which learners are doubly disadvantaged by their limited competence in the target language as well as the power imbalance between the learners and their interlocutors. The authors demonstrate that difficulties of understanding can be managed suc-cessfully when there is a reduction of the asymmetry of the interaction and the overt establishment of shared knowledge. This is accomplished not only by pre-emptive action on the part of the target language speaker, but by a willingness on the part of the learner to demonstrate a lack of understand-ing. In either case, both parties need to ensure that understanding is achieved without loss of face.While the ESF project was remarkable in both its objectives and out-comes, it did not focus directly on the relationship between identity and language learning. The biographies of the learners, included in the appendices of the ESF reports, provide thumbnail sketches of the learners, and the his-tories, memories and desires of the 26 informants were not central to the analysis. In my study I hope to demonstrate that important insights about language learning can be gained through a comprehensive analysis of the multiple identities of language learners in the different domains of their lives.Literacy and Hispanic immigrant women in the USARockhill’s (1987a, 1987b) influential literacy study with Hispanic immi-grant women in Los Angeles in the USA is distinguished from the ESF Project in its attempt to link the acquisition of English literacy to the daily lives and experiences of informants. Because Rockhill worked with a relatively large number of women (approximately 50), while my study is a smaller case study of five women, Rockhill’s research provides a lens through which I can interrogate my findings on identity and language learning. The conception of literacy in Rockhill’s study, like that of the Barton and Hampton study discussed in Chapter 2, is more than simply knowing how to read and write. As Rockhill (1987a, pp. 327–8) notes, ‘Literacy is a social practice, as well as a discursive and ideological practice, and it symbolizes becoming “educated”.’ The women that Rockhill interviewed did not talk directly about illiteracy, they talked about not knowing English. Despite the fact that learning English was extremely difficult, given the material and social conditions of the women in the study, the women nevertheless expressed shame and guilt at not being able to communicate in English and blamed themselves for The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 79making little progress in learning English. Rockhill notes that, while all the women expressed the desire to go to school, to learn English, to become liter-ate, they did not think of literacy as a right for themselves, although they perceived it to be a right for their husbands and their children. Even those women who were talented and highly educated put their own needs last in the family: Success for these women was interpreted to be the extent to which their children and husbands were successful, and they concentrated their energies on providing a better life for their families.Rockhill’s study provides a larger framework for my study because it investigates literacy as both a social practice and a gendered one. I demon-strate in this book that the way the women learnt English, their exposure to English, and their opportunities to practice English, were structured to a large extent by their identities as women. For example, in contrast to the older women, the young women in my study, who had no children, had fewer domestic responsibilities and more time and energy to devote to learning English and finding work that would give them access to English speakers. The older women, on the other hand, were torn by the demands of their domestic duties and their desire to learn English. Like the women in Rockhill’s study, their own needs were always considered secondary to the needs of their families. In making the argument that second language learning is a gendered activity, I explore how the use of the mother tongue, the language of the private sphere, and the use of English, the language of the public sphere, inter-sect in diverse ways with the identities of the women and their practice of English. Rockhill’s study, however, also contrasts with findings from my study in that knowledge of English, for my participants, was not synonymous with being educated: all the women in my study were relatively well edu-cated. However, the concern for these women was that their education and experience had little social value in Canada, and hence gave them little access to the material resources they desperately sought. This had an important impact on their access to desirable social networks, their classed identities and their opportunities to speak English. Such an analysis is absent in Rockhill’s work. Because my study, unlike Rockhill’s, is a longitudinal one, and because my participants are able to articulate and reflect on their experiences in writ-ten form, I have been able to gain some unique insights into the production of their identities as immigrant women and language learners.The Canadian World of Immigrant WomenImmigration in Canada is experienced differently by newcomers from diverse parts of the world, settling in different regions in Canada, and at different points in Canadian history. The multiple meanings of immigrant must be also understood with reference to the reasons why people immigrate to Canada, the experiences they have had before coming to Canada and the 80 Ident ity and Language Learningconditions under which they live in Canada. While Canada’s policy of mul-ticulturalism invites immigrants of different backgrounds into a country in which acceptance and respect is fundamental to government policy, there is recognition that some immigrants have been marginalized and subjected to discrimination. Immigrant women may be particularly vulnerable in this regard. Boyd (1992) demonstrates how some foreign-born women are fre-quently triply disadvantaged by their status as female, as foreign-born and by their origins or race. As a result, certain groups of immigrant women are frequently at the bottom of the socio–economic scale, particularly if they are recent arrivals or from Asian or Southern European countries. Furthermore, Boyd notes that even after living in Canada for a number of years, immigrant women are more than twice as likely as their male counterparts not to know an official language well enough to carry on a conversation. Not knowing an official language results in fewer job opportunities for these women. Even when immigrant women do find work, it tends to be in ethnically segmented low-paying occupations in which extensive oral interaction is not a require-ment of the job. Seven out of ten immigrant women without knowledge of English or French are employed in service, processing and fabrication occupa-tions (Boyd, 1992). In order to appreciate the specific experiences of Eva, Mai, Katarina, Martina and Felicia, I turn to an examination of Canadian research that helps to locate the stories of these five women in a broader sociohistori-cal context.Ng’s study of immigrant women in VancouverIn the summer of 1978, Ng (1981) conducted a study to determine how immigrant women’s experience is located in the social and economic context of Canada. In particular, Ng focused her research on the social processes whereby a person comes to be labelled as an ‘immigrant’, or an ‘ethnic’ in Canada. Ng makes the point that some landed immigrants are not consid-ered to be ethnic, while others who have been in Canada for 50 years are still regarded as immigrants. Of importance to my study is Ng’s finding that it is in the social organization of immigrant women’s lives – how they are orga-nized in relation to the social service delivery system, the labor market, the educational system – that immigrant women’s ethnicity becomes a signifi-cant feature. As she argues,An immigrant woman’s ethnicity becomes consequential when she inter-acts with the rest of society, e.g. the bus driver, the cashier at the super-market, or the social worker. The attribution then . . . draws on the fact that she looks different; that she cannot function adequately or conduct herself properly on such occasions. Her ethnicity is posited as a reason for her incompetence. This is the point at which ethnicity arises for the immigrant. (p. 103)The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 81Ng stresses the fact that differences between the immigrant women’s experi-ence in Canada and their home countries are not merely cultural differences. In their home countries, immigrant women conduct themselves in a compe-tent manner, and their physical difference does not have the same degree of consequence for their interactions in the larger society. In Canadian society – or any new society for that matter – the adequate functioning of an indi-vidual assumes a commonsense knowledge of the organizational forms which determine how the society works. Ethnicity is enacted and recreated for immigrant women whenever contact is made with members of the larger society, and Ng notes that an immigrant women’s ethnicity is reinforced when there is a disjuncture between how the everyday world works and her knowledge and understanding of it.Cumming and Gill’s Indo-Canadian studyWhile Ng was interested in the construction of ethnicity among immigrant women in Canada, Cumming and Gill (Cumming, 1990; Cumming & Gill, 1991, 1992) focused their research on the extent to which language education might better serve one population of immigrant women. Bilingual ESL literacy classes and child care services were offered free of charge, two afternoons per week, to a small group of Punjabi-speaking women at a community service agency in Vancouver. The researchers sought to ascertain the women’s decisions to study ESL literacy, as well as their uses of literacy, English and Punjabi in their daily lives. Of interest to my study is the finding that none of the women had any English-speaking friends or acquaintances, despite the fact that they had been in Canada for an average of six (one to 13) years. Only one woman occasionally spoke to her neighbor in English and the one woman who had worked regularly said that she only occasionally spoke to the security guard or representative of the contracting company at her janitorial job. Occasionally, anglophones would speak to the women on the street about their babies. Thus, prior to educational intervention, the women had few opportunities to practice the little English they had. This observation led Cumming and Gill to challenge the prevailing view in Canadian language planning circles that opportuni-ties to practice the second language will occur through informal contact with the majority society. Further, Cumming and Gill note that ‘gender is a fundamental consideration to be accounted for in conceptualizing adult’s motivation or potential to learn a second language’ (p. 248). For many of the women in their study, the most important priorities were to take care of the family and household. Only after domestic commitments had been met could they indulge in the luxury of an education. In addition, it was the husbands – most of whom were competent English speakers – who took on the major responsibility of interacting with the public world, buying major purchases, dealing with public institutions, thereby further 82 Ident ity and Language Learning restricting the extent and quality of interaction that the women had with the majority society.Goldstein’s bilingual workplace studyIn another part of the country, with a different group of learners, Goldstein (1996) conducted a critical ethnographic study of bilingual life and language choice in a multicultural/multilingual factory in Toronto in which the majority of workers were Portuguese immigrant women. The study raised questions about the assumptions that are often made about the way immigrant workers need to communicate in the Ontario workplace in order to fulfil their responsibilities at work. Of particular relevance to my study is the finding that the use of English was associated with more social and eco-nomic costs than benefits. At the factory, most of the production workers were Portuguese, and the Portuguese language functioned as a symbol of solidarity and group membership in what was akin to an extended family of line workers, in which workers referred to one another as sister, brother daughter. The use of Portuguese was associated with the rights, obligations and expectations members of the family had of each other at work – for example, to help keep the line up, to substitute for those in need. In order for women (whether mother-tongue speakers of Portuguese, Italian or Spanish) to gain access to the friendship networks on the line, they had to speak Portuguese, a minority language, rather than English, the dominant language of the wider Canadian community. Portuguese speakers who used English at work ran the risk of being accused of insulting members of their community and of jeopardizing their access to symbolic and material resources in the workplace. Goldstein argues that the value of friendship and assistance at work is not to be underestimated because workers need the help of co-workers in order to meet efficiency standards. As I will indicate in Chapter 4, this finding speaks directly to Mai’s experience in the workplace.As well, Goldstein argues that access to English must be understood with reference to the gendered structure and dynamics of the Portuguese family and the class position the workers hold in the Canadian political economy. Most of the Portuguese workers who were able to secure higher-paying jobs off the line were people who had access to English-speaking contacts and English literacy skills prior to joining the factory. This latter group consisted primarily of Portuguese men or women who had immigrated to Canada before the age of 16, and had access to anglophone schooling. Like Katarina’s and Felicia’s husbands, the Portuguese men had access to English speakers through the nature of their work in their home countries and/or in Canada while others had attended federally sponsored formal language training in Canada. The reasons why the women had not accessed such formal language training include resistance from their fathers because of the presence of so many boys in the classroom, domestic responsibilities, fear of going out at The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 83night and a lack of self-confidence. Goldstein notes that working-class women with only four years of schooling in Portugal saw nothing better than the line work that they did, work that is associated with the use of Portuguese.Burnaby, Harper and Norton Peirce’s Levi Strauss studyAnother study, commissioned by Levi Strauss & Co. (Canada), highlights the challenges that immigrant women face in learning English in some Canadian workplaces. In the early 1990s, Burnaby, Harper and Norton Peirce conducted an evaluation of the ESL programs in three Levi Strauss garment factories in Canada.3 The objective of the study was to evaluate the social impact of the English workplace programs on stakeholders in the three plants, plants that were staffed predominantly by women. The researchers found that the opportunity for the learners to practice their English was minimal. There was little evidence of social conversation on the factory floor, a situation exacerbated by the stressful nature of the piecework system, in which workers were paid in proportion to the amount of work they did rather than by the hour, and by the noise level in the plants, which made the wearing of ear-plugs mandatory. Supervisors had the most individual contact with line-workers, but they tended to communicate in formulaic English, sometimes referred to as Levi-English. Friendship networks were generally based on common language and English speakers would seldom socialize with non-English speakers. In the canteen, employees tended to sit with people who spoke a common language.Further, many of the non-English speakers felt marginalized within the factories by virtue of their lack of command of English and the fact that they perceived themselves to be non-Canadian. For example, some said they needed to speak English to defend themselves against exploitation by super-visors who favoured the Canadians by giving them the easy bundles of jeans to work on; others said they felt like invalids because they could not speak English. Many did not access the opportunity to participate in the ESL pro-gram in their plant because their experience of marginalization kept them silent. In addition, the domestic lives of the workers intersected in a number of interesting ways with the women’s investment in the ESL program, para-doxically leading many women to avoid participating in the ESL program (Norton Peirce et al., 1993). For many women, the workplace represented a release from the tedium of their domestic lives, and they did not want to do anything to jeopardize their independence. Thus some women were afraid that they might lose their jobs – and access to the few friends they had in Canada – if they took the ESL course and became distracted from the demands of production. Others were the sole breadwinners in the family and lived a hand-to-mouth existence. They wished to focus all their energies on earning as much money as they could to support their families, and were 84 Ident ity and Language Learningafraid that taking English classes would hamper their productivity by reduc-ing the momentum required for piecework. Others did not want to attend the ESL class because their husbands did not want their wives to become more educated than they were.Morgan’s action research study with immigrant womenOn a more optimistic note, Morgan’s (1997) action research with immi-grant women in a community-based ESL classroom in Toronto offers a com-pelling example of how ESL teachers can help address social iniquities in their classrooms. In providing a detailed account of his teaching of intona-tion to a group of predominantly Chinese immigrant women, he notes as follows:What stands out most in this activity is how the foregrounding of social power and identity issues seemed to facilitate greater comprehension of sentence level stress and intonation as strategic resources for (re)defining social relationships based on gender and ethnicity.Drawing on critical research, he investigates how a common subject area such as pronunication can have what he calls emancipatory potential. His central conclusion – that language teachers need to conceive of their students as having social needs and aspirations which may be inseparable from lin-guistic needs – is integral to my own study.Biography, Identity and Language LearningTo varying degrees, the European, American and Canadian studies cited above provide insight into the paradoxical position of immigrant language learners in relation to communication with target language speakers. On the one hand, immigrant language learners need access to the social networks of target language speakers in order to practice and improve the target lan-guage; on the other hand, they have difficulty gaining access to these net-works because common language is an a priori condition of entry into them. What is absent from all these studies, however, are the voices of particular learners, their distinctive histories, their unique desires for the future. Such biographical insights are important in understanding the relationship between identity and language learning. As Weiler (1991) argues, while the category women references women of different races, classes and sexual ori-entations, the category woman is multiple, shifting and subject to change. By extension, immigrant women must not be understood as an undifferentiated group, united in their experiences of language learning, whether in the class-room or community. By drawing on the voices, histories and desires of five The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 85distinct and unique women, at a particular time and place, I have sought to develop an enhanced understanding of the relationship between identity and language learning. In this spirit, I provide below a preliminary introduction to each of the five women, an introduction that will be given greater depth and texture in Chapters 4 and 5.EvaWhen I first met Eva, I was struck by her friendly demeanor and gener-ous spirit. Born in Poland in 1967, she finished high school and worked as a bartender before she left Poland at the age of 20. Before arriving in Canada in 1989, in the refugee class, she spent two years in Italy where she became fluent in Italian. She had also learnt Russian at school, and could understand what she called Czechoslovakian and Yugoslavian.4 She knew no English before arriving in Canada. Eva immigrated because she wanted ‘economical advantage’ and chose to come to Canada because it is one of the few indus-trialized countries that encourage immigration. She came alone, with no family or friends, but did know one person in Newtown before she arrived. Fairly soon after arriving in Canada, Eva moved into an apartment with Janusz, a Polish man, having resisted the attention of other men who were not Polish. Eva explained that her choice of a Polish partner was not coinci-dental. ‘For me, I prefer somebody from Poland, because this person can understand you better, the same way as they, instead of someone who is Canadian.’ The home seemed to be a place of refuge for Eva and she was comfortable with her domestic situation. Very little English was spoken in Eva’s home, though she did occasionally watch tv and listen to music on English radio stations.When Eva arrived in Newtown, she found employment at what she calls the Italian store, which is situated in the heart of an established Italian neighborhood in Newtown. Eva herself lived in this neighborhood, as do many recent immigrants to Newtown, and was given the job because she was a fluent speaker of Italian. She was well liked at the Italian store because many Canadians of Italian background patronized the store, and liked to be served in Italian. Eva was very happy at the store, but was concerned because she wanted to learn English, and had little opportunity to practice English at work. She was pleased therefore that, after only two months in Canada, she managed to get a place in a language training programme at Ontario College in Newtown. Eva reduced her hours at the Italian store and worked only one day a week, on Saturdays. After Eva finished the language course, she began looking for another job in earnest, at a place where she could become a more proficient speaker of English. She found employment at a restaurant in Newtown, Munchies, where she was the only employee who could not speak English fluently. Munchies is an upmarket fast-food restaurant situ-ated in a trendy part of town. Eva was a full-time employee who performed 86 Ident ity and Language Learninga variety of jobs, the most important of which was to clean the store and prepare the food for cooking. Her experiences at Munchies will be more fully documented in the following chapter.Eva was happy that she came to Canada. In response to the essay topic ‘Some people think that Canada is “a good country for immigrants”. Do you think this is true? Please explain’, Eva wrote:5I do agree with those people’s statement. I don’t know what particular issues they have on their minds, but I can come up with some examples supporting this point of view. Canadian government gives money to pro-grammes that help the immigrants develop the basic skills needed in settling down in a foreign country. The most important thing for a new-comer is to be able to communicate in English. Everyone interested in learning it has a variety of day or night courses offered by local schools. At the same time, a qualified immigrant can be financially supported by government so it is possible for an individual to devote most of one’s time to learning process. Government also assists in finding jobs related to immigrant’s previous positions. Overall Canada is a good country for immigrants because the government as well as ordinary people try to help during the difficult process of assimilating in a new country.Eva felt that she has made a good deal of progress in learning English: ‘I can communicate with outside world, I can be confident while talking to Canadians. Finally I can work in the place where speaking English is a neces-sity,’ she wrote. To explain her progress, Eva drew a distinction between formal and natural sites of language learning: ‘The English as a Second Language course helped me to learn the basics of English. Later, practicing English in everyday conversations helped me to be more fluent.’ Nevertheless, she was well aware that opportunities to practice English were not readily accessible because of the social organization of Canadian society:I think it is difficult to have friends who would be willing to help to learn English. It is caused by the fact that social life doesn’t offer many chances of meeting different people. Often conversations that are not connected with the place of work would certainly be very helpful in the process of learning English.After two years in Canada, Eva reached the stage in which she could feel confident talking to Canadians and finding work in mainstream anglophone jobs. However, despite the fact that she understood the importance of prac-ticing her English in order to become more fluent, she did not have much opportunity to meet Canadians outside her work situation. There is a dis-juncture between the anglophone world and her own. As she said: ‘At home I live in the Polish community.’ This disjuncture is not only one of difference The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 87however. Despite the fact that Eva was able to communicate with the outside world, she still felt marginalized by it: ‘Because of my distinguishable pro-nunciation I am viewed as an immigrant by others and therefore I still feel like one,’ she said.MaiLike Eva, Mai was young, courageous and spirited. She was born in 1968 in Vietnam and arrived in Canada in October 1989, when she was 21 years old. She immigrated with her elderly parents ‘for my life in the future’. Mai’s father is Chinese, her mother Vietnamese, and Mai is fluent in both Cantonese and Vietnamese. She had no knowledge of English before coming to Canada. Mai has eight brothers and sisters, two of whom live in Canada. One of her brothers who lives in Newtown helped to sponsor Mai’s immigra-tion to Canada in the Family class. Before coming to Canada, she had not lived in any other country. Mai remained in her brother’s home in Newtown from the time she arrived in Canada until the time she married in May 1992. At this time she moved to a neighboring city where her husband’s family lived. In her brother’s home, she left behind her brother, sister, three nephews and her mother and father. As I will discuss in greater detail in Chapter 4, a good deal of English was spoken in Mai’s home because her nephews were all monolingual anglophones. However, unlike the situation for Eva, I dem-onstrate that home was not a place of refuge from the outside world.Mai completed her high school education before coming to Canada, and had been trained as a dressmaker in Vietnam. Before starting the ESL course in January 1990, Mai worked for a short period at a packing factory in the Newtown area. Soon after she finished the ESL course, she found a job at a small garment factory in Newtown and worked there until she got married. Although Mai worked full-time, she also continued to take nighttime ESL courses at Ontario College. Initially, Mai’s work in the garment factory gave her many opportunities to hear English and speak English. Mai says that the Canadian way of life makes it easy to learn English because ‘with the life in here I need go to work. So at job I meet people. They all speak English.’ Nevertheless, as I will indicate in Chapter 4, this situation changed dramati-cally when workers were laid off. Mai said that she ultimately hopes to return to college and study for a professional degree.Despite the challenges that Mai faced in her first two years in Canada, she was happy she immigrated, writing as follows:Canadian people are very friendly and helpful. It is a big country, there are a lot of companies, factories and farms with many kind of jobs. Don’t need too much the knowledge of the English language or experience. People just come to Canada can find the job without too much difficulty. Also the Government of Canada is very caring about life of immigrants. 88 Ident ity and Language LearningIt helps people go to school for six months. If someone is out of work they can go to Employment and Immigration Canada. More or less they will have some help from there to go though their hard times.Mai noted that Canadian people have been friendly and helpful to her. She has had no difficulty getting a job because of her sewing skills; however, unlike the case for Eva, this kind of job was not dependent on a good com-mand of the English language. She was also impressed with the social ser-vices provided by the Canadian government. Nevertheless, despite her positive comments on Canadians and the Canadian government, Mai noted that she still feels like an immigrant in Canada. Apart from her accent, Mai said that she did not have the features of a white Canadian, and was imme-diately recognized as different by strangers. For these reasons, Mai wrote that she would never be considered part of mainstream Canadian society:I’m an immigrant in Canada. Even I’ll be living in Canada for whole my life. Because I have a lot of things that completely different. Like the accent. Custom. Even sometimes people ask when they don’t know me too well Are you Chinese? It makes me have more feeling that I’m immi-grant, or Chinese Canadian citizen.With reference to her learning of English, Mai expressed confidence that her English had improved significantly since her arrival in Canada: ‘I’m able to read, write and speak English. I’m able to understand a lot of things that people talk with me, and I can talk with them whatever I need.’ She indi-cated that what had helped her to learn English the most was ‘the commu-nity, at work, watch tv and read the book or newspaper’. Like Eva, Mai felt comfortable speaking English to her friends or anglophone members of her family and felt uncomfortable speaking English with people she didn’t know and with people she considered her superiors, such as her boss at work. However, it is significant that Mai also indicated that when she had personal domestic problems, she felt uncomfortable using English:I feel comfortable using English most of the time except when I have some problems because by that time the problem’s always in my mind. It makes me feel uncomfortable to use English.KatarinaKatarina was born in Poland in 1955 and arrived in Canada in April 1989, with her husband and child, a daughter Maria, aged six at the time. The family immigrated to Canada because they ‘disliked communism’ and the family’s immigration, in the refugee class, was sponsored by the Catholic church. Before coming to Canada, the family spent a year in Austria. Apart The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 89from her mother tongue, Polish, Katarina had a limited command of German and Russian when she arrived in Canada. Although Katarina had no knowl-edge of English, her husband was reasonably fluent as he had worked in international trade in Poland and had used English in his job. When the family arrived in Newtown, they stayed at a sponsor’s home for a temporary period before renting a two-bedroom apartment in the same building in which Eva lived. In Poland, Katarina was a teacher with a Master of Arts degree in biological sciences; her husband is similarly qualified. When she first arrived in Canada, she worked full time at a German restaurant as a kitchen help for a period of eight months and then, after the ESL course, found part-time work as a homemaker for an organization called Community Service. In this job she had the opportunity to speak English on a regular basis. In September 1990 she began an English upgrading course to give her further practice in learning English, but switched over to a Grade 12 ESL course in early 1991. After receiving her Grade 12 ESL credit, she began an 18-month computer course, graduating in December 1992. Her plans for the future are to find a good, well-paying job.Katarina wrote that many people feel good in Canada, a place where there is much diversity in the population:Most people feel good in Canada. A great deal of people came here after the Second World War but many came here in last years. Most of them had spent one or two years in Austria, German, Greece or Italy. Austria is a beautiful country but only to visit but not to live in. Another nation-ality person doesn’t feel good in that country because most of people there are people who were born there. Immigrants feel good in Canada because they are aware of various nationalities. In Canada life has a high standard. The Government gives possibility for people to study. The mothers with children but without husbands have help from the govern-ment. People who aren’t able to work or can’t find the job receive social welfare. I think that Canada is a ‘good country for immigrants’.Despite the high standard of living in Canada and the support given by the Canadian government to immigrants, Katarina was nevertheless ambivalent about her immigrant status and unsure whether or not she has been accepted into mainstream Canadian society. She felt at a great disadvantage in Canada because, although she is well-educated, she was not a fluent speaker of English, nor did she have the financial backing to devote all her time to learn-ing English: ‘In my native country I was a teacher. I studied 17 years. I am not able to be a very good speaker of English because I need five to seven years to study English and I am short of money.’6 She noted that a good education and knowledge of English give people options in life – the choice, for example, of doing a variety of jobs: ‘The life is easier when somebody can communicate with other people, can explain exactly what somebody is 90 Ident ity and Language Learningthinking, can do another job than have to do, because somebody has good education and is a good speaker of English.’However, Katarina was happy that she had made much progress in learn-ing English and was able to speak with Canadian people, read the newspaper, listen to the radio, watch and understand television. She initially placed great faith in formal language learning to help her become a good speaker of English. In December 1990 she indicated that teachers – and textbooks – had helped her the most to learn English: ‘Very important is a teacher. The second place has a textbook.’ A year later, however, Katarina had changed her posi-tion a little. While still acknowledging the value of ESL courses, she also stressed the value of speaking with people and taking courses that weren’t devoted solely to language instruction. Like Eva and Mai, Katarina felt com-fortable speaking English with friends, but was less comfortable when talking to professional people such as ‘my teacher; the doctor’ noting in addition, ‘I feel comfortable using English when I speak with one person or in a small group of people. I feel uncomfortable when I speak in a large group of people.’MartinaMartina was born in Czechoslovakia in 1952 and came to Canada in March 1989 when she was 37 years old. She was accompanied by her hus-band Petr and her three children (Jana 17, Elsbet 14 and Milos 11 at the time). She came to Canada for a ‘better life for children’. Before arriving in Canada, Martina spent 19 months in Austria and one month in Yugoslavia. Although Martina’s mother tongue is Czech, she also learnt Slovak and Russian at school. When she was in Austria waiting for a visa, she learnt to speak German. Neither she nor her husband knew any English before they came to Canada, but their children had received some English language training in Austria. Martina and her family, officially classified as refugees, were spon-sored by the Catholic church. They came to Newtown because this is where the sponsor found an apartment for them. The apartment was in the base-ment of a house and was noisy and very expensive. After a year, Martina and her family found a two-bedroom apartment in the same building in which Eva and Katarina lived. They remained there for a year before they moved to Winchester in July 1991 where Petr had found a job.In Czechoslovakia Martina had a professional degree as a surveyor. When Martina arrived in Newtown she worked at Fast Foods as a cook help but left this job when she started the ESL course. Since Martina left the ESL course, she attended an English skills course for the duration of the 10-month course, after which time the family moved to Winchester. In Winchester, Martina found a job as a cashier at a local community college, and took a part-time course as a tax preparer. She graduated top of her class. In the future Martina said she would like to get a challenging job, but was unsure of her prospects.The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 91In December Martina indicated that the difficulties she was experiencing in finding a good job could be explained by her limited English skills: ‘I’m not afraid about a work, and if my English is now better, maybe I’ll be lucky and find a good job.’ A year later, however, Martina began to think that knowledge of English was not enough to secure her the kind of job she wanted, stressing the employer’s desire for Canadian experience: ‘I’d like work as a surveyor or some other job, where is a lot of math. I thought that for getting this job I need more English, but now I am not sure, because everybody asks for Canadian experiences and references.’ Martina’s husband Petr, who is a plumber, has also had great difficulty finding a job in his pro-fession, and has been laid off work on a number of occasions. This has come as a great shock to Martina’s family because they never had to face the pros-pect of unemployment in Czechoslovakia: ‘It is very different, because every-thing has different rules. In my country, everything is owned by the government, and almost every application goes to the government. We never were dreading that we can lose a job if we worked hard.’ Very little English was spoken in Martina’s home, and her jobs gave her little opportunity to practice it in the workplace. Furthermore, in the community in which she lived, there were few English speakers: ‘For me is very big problem speaking, and if there are a lot of immigrants in Newtown, then is a small chance talk and correct all sentences.’ She indicated, however, that she had made prog-ress in learning English and was able to perform numerous tasks in English.Martina was ambivalent about the family’s decision to come to Canada, writing that they have had both good and bad experiences in the country: ‘Some people are very friendly and helpful, but on the other side, some people take advantage of us.’ Nevertheless, despite unpleasant experiences in Canada and job insecurity, Martina still thinks that Canada is a good country for immigrants. With ‘capability and courage’ a hardworking person should be able to make a successful life for themselves in Canada:Even though the economic situation is not good at this time in the whole world, I think that Canada is a good country for immigrants, especially for hardworkers. Canada is a very big country and if you are young you can move from one place to another and find a place according to your own imagination. First of all you must learn English to understand and to speak with the people, then if you cannot find a job in your profession you might take some courses and later on get a better job depending on your capability and courage.Martina said that she still feels like an immigrant in Canada, someone less worthy than other Canadians: ‘Because of my accent some people treat me as less worthy than they are (especially when I was looking for a job)’ she wrote. Martina thought that people would treat her differently when she became a good speaker of English because ‘some Canadians are fed up with 92 Ident ity and Language Learningpeople who are not able to communicate well in English’. She said that she never felt comfortable speaking English because she could not explain things as competently as she could in her mother tongue, noting, in addition, ‘I feel uncomfortable using English in the group of people whose English language is their mother tongue because they speak fluently without any problems and I feel inferior.’FeliciaThe eldest of the five women, Felicia was born in 1945 in Lima, Peru. She arrived in Canada as a landed immigrant in March 1989 with her husband, who had a professional visa, and her three children, two elder boys aged 16 and 14, and a little girl aged six at time of arrival. They came to Canada because ‘The terrorism was increasing in Peru’. Of the five women in the study, Felicia had lived the most opulent lifestyle before coming to Canada, was the only woman who knew some English before coming to Canada and had travelled to North America before immigrating. Her family had lived in an exclusive neighborhood in Lima and owned a beach cottage where they regularly went for weekend getaways. When the family arrived in Canada they came to Newtown because ‘Newtown is like the place we used to live’. They lived in a three-bedroom apartment in a middle-class neighborhood where most of the people – predominantly elderly people – speak English as a first language. In 1992 they bought a house of their own in Newtown.Felicia’s mother tongue is Spanish, but she can understand some Italian and Portuguese. Her husband and two sons were good speakers of Eng-lish before coming to Canada because they had attended private English-medium schools in Peru, and her husband had used English in his job. Her little girl Maria soon learnt English in the public elementary school she attended, but Spanish is still the language used in the home. Felicia had been trained as an elementary school teacher in Peru, although she had given up this job when she had children. Here in Canada she has had only part-time positions, delivering newspapers and babysitting at the Fair Lawns Recreational Center. In the future she hopes ‘to study some career’.Felicia and her family were under a great deal of emotional and financial stress in Canada because Felicia’s husband was unable to find a job in his profession in Canada. Although he applied for countless positions and was interviewed many times, he struggled to find suitable employment. Felicia attributed their difficult position to the fact that Canadians discriminate against immigrants. Felicia was the only one of the five women who stated unequivocally that she was unhappy the family had come to Canada, writ-ing as follows in June 1990:At the moment, I think the life is very quiet her, and very organized. But we haven’t found yet our way in this country. Sometimes, I perceive that The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 93some Canadians look down at the immigrants. I don’t know why, if ALL Canadians came from other countries too. Canada is formed from immi-grants. I think that the authorities of the Canadian consulate should tell the truth about the difficulties to get a job for a person who has a very good preparation and experience in his profession. Canadians think that here there isn’t discrimination, but I don’t think so. I hope that, in the future, I could change my mind.A year-and-a-half later, Felicia had not changed her mind. She stated in December 1991 that professional people who immigrate have a much more difficult time in Canada than immigrants who have lived under communism or lived in poverty. These people can ‘work in any kind of work’, said Felicia, arguing that it is difficult for wealthy people to have the kind of lifestyle they lived in their home countries, and it is difficult for them to return to the home country once the children have settled down. For Felicia, the only strength that Canada has is that it is a relatively peaceful, law-abiding country:Canada can be a good country for some kinds of immigrants; people who lived in countries under communism are happy here or people who never had anything in their countries. Here, they can work in any kind of work and get things. But professional people and wealthy people lose a lot coming to Canada. They are not welcome here as the Canadian Consul told them in their countries. They spend a lot of their money here and is not easy to come back when they have children looking for their way in life. Opportunities are very difficult to find for them, and life goes with-out emotion. The only thing I find is good, is that there is no terrorism and many thiefs here.Felicia’s disappointment over their immigrant experience led her to resist any identification with Canada. She strongly resisted being labeled an immigrant and sought refuge in her Peruvian identity. Wealthy Peruvians living in Canada were her reference group and she considered herself a ‘foreigner person who lives here by accident’:I’ve never felt an immigrant in Canada, just as a foreigner person who lives here by accident and I’ll never feel Canadian, because I don’t think that Canada is a friendly country. Canada only brings people because it needs them, not because it wants to help them.Nevertheless, Felicia indicated that her English had improved since her arrival in Canada and, recognizing the need for what she called ‘practice, practice, practice’, she organized regular meetings in her home with a Canadian woman who wanted to learn Spanish. She noted that listening and speaking 94 Ident ity and Language Learningat her work helped her to improve her English, writing that ‘it has been good for me to listen every day to the ladies who work with me’. Like Mai, how-ever, she said that it is sometimes hard for her to learn English ‘because I live here with many tensions. I have to do too many things too and I don’t have enough time to study’. Like Eva, Mai and Katarina, Felicia felt comfortable speaking English to anglophone friends, but was uncomfortable speaking to strangers: ‘I feel comfortable or almost comfortable with people that I know very well. I feel uncomfortable with people that I don’t know’. She indicated, in addition, the importance of feeling confident in order to speak English. Such confidence, however, was absent when she was in the presence of Peruvian people who could speak English well:I feel comfortable using English with people I know and have confidence with them, especially with the lady who I meet each week to practice English and Spanish conversation. I feel uncomfortable with new people and never can speak English in front of Peruvian people who speak English correctly.CommentIt is important to note that all five women in the study were good lan-guage learners. The very fact that they all took the opportunity to partici-pate in the diary study is indicative of their desire to gain regular exposure to English and practice in English. While all the women had a strong drive to communicate, the data indicate, however, that all of the women had dif-ficulty speaking under conditions of marginalization. If they felt inferior, they felt uncomfortable speaking. This is not to say that the learners had inhibited personalities, or were not willing to make mistakes (Rubin, 1975). Most often, the women felt marginalized because they felt positioned as immigrants and not because of invariant personality traits. They did not feel different but equal to their Canadian peers; they often felt, in Martina’s words, ‘less worthy’ than Canadians. The women were thus sensitive to the social relations of power in their daily interactions and only felt comfortable speaking in the company of friends who knew them well.A common theme running through these stories (apart from those pre-sented by Felicia) is that all the women think that the Canadian government is generous towards immigrants and provides adequate social security in times of hardship. Eva, Mai, Katarina and Martina made distinctions between formal government policy and their day-to-day experiences of interaction with Canadians. As noted by Martina, ‘Even though the economic situation is not good at this time in the whole world, I think that Canada is a good country for immigrants especially for hardworkers.’ They all recognized that the Canadian government has a generous health and social welfare system The World of Adult Immigrant Language Learners 95and puts substantial resources into providing language training for certain classes of immigrants. Further, many of the negative experiences the women had in Canada related to economic conditions: Eva had difficulty finding a job, there were cutbacks at Mai’s workplace, Katarina and her husband could not find jobs in their professions, Martina could not find a job in her profes-sion and her husband was laid off work, and neither Felicia nor her husband could find jobs in their professions. For this reason, the symbolic resources that the women had brought with them to Canada were not validated in the places where they did find work. If they had managed to find work in their professions (and this is particularly true for the older women), they might have had easier access to anglophone social networks, and hence greater opportunity to speak and practice English.In Chapter 4 and Chapter 5, respectively, I turn to an in-depth analysis of the stories of the two younger participants, Eva and Mai, and the three older participants, Katarina, Martina and Felicia. Although I recognize the multiplicity of each woman’s identity, I have sought to capture what for me were particularly salient identities with respect to each woman’s investment in English. It is important to note, further, that the stories these women have told are their stories. I have taken seriously their interpretations of events and their understanding of cultural practices in Canadian society. I have sought to understand the world as they have understood it, and have not questioned whether their interpretation of events was the correct or true interpretation. Since I have sought to understand identity and language learning, it has been necessary for me to understand the world as the language learner under-stands it.Notes(1) See the website: www.international.metropolis.globalx.net(2) See Auerbach (1997), Benesch (1996), Burnaby (1997), Morgan (1997), Roberts, Davies and Jupp (1992), Wallerstein (1983).(3) See Burnaby, Harper and Norton Peirce (1992); Harper, Norton Peirce and Burnaby (1996); Norton Peirce, Harper and Burnaby (1993). It is important to note that, while these publications documented practices current at the time, a number of changes were taking place in these workplaces, particularly with regard to the use of the piecework system.(4) Eva made no distinction between Czech and Slovak, or between Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian and Macedonian.(5) Minor corrections, particularly those which impede comprehension, have been made to the writing of the participants.(6) Although Katarina and her husband did not have much disposable income, they nev-ertheless used the resources they had to upgrade her qualifications, with a view to securing skilled work in the future. (See Chapter 5.)96 Ident ity and Language Learning97Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young ShouldersWe children, not rooted to white stolen land, must find our rest in small spaces, our home in small secure places of our own making.Yee, 1993, p. 19Both Eva and Mai made great progress in learning English, but in different ways and for different reasons. In this chapter I draw on my understanding of the lives and experiences of these two young women to examine the rela-tionship between investment, identity and language learning, showing in particular how the construction of identity in one site, the home, intersects with the construction of identity in another site, the workplace. With respect to Eva’s experience at Munchies, I demonstrate how she was initially mar-ginalized and silenced because her symbolic and material resources were not valued in the workplace. This marginalization is explained with reference to the job Eva did, her limited command of English and ethnocentric relations of power. It was only after a period of months that Eva gradually gained acceptance and respect from her co-workers, and with it access to the anglo-phone social networks that gave her increased opportunities to speak. How and why these changes occurred is discussed in detail. With respect to Mai, I describe the language patterns in her home environment, demonstrating how they are best understood in the context of larger patriarchal, material and racist social structures. I suggest that her investment in English must be understood with reference to her desire to resist the patriarchal structures in the home and to redefine her identity in the private domain of her life. I examine how and why Mai’s workplace offered opportunities for Mai to practice English, and how changes in the language practices in the workplace accompanied changes in the language of power, together with Mai’s oppor-tunities to practice English. How these changes in turn represented a threat to Mai’s identity in the home and workplace, and to her investment in English, is addressed.4Eva‘I have the same possibilities as Canadians.’Eva’s investment in English must be understood with reference to her reasons for coming to Canada, her plans for the future and her changing identity. She had come to Canada for economic advantage and hoped ultimately to go to university to study for a degree in business. She knew that she needed to be a good speaker of English in order to work where she wanted to work, to go to the university of her choice and to rid herself of an immigrant identity. In other words, she valued English for the access it gave her to the public world – or what she called the outside world. Because she had no children and few domestic responsibilities, Eva could devote her time to pursuing her career goals in Canada.Eva’s home: A place of refugeWhile Eva had a great deal of investment in learning English, she wanted the private domain of her life to be Polish. As indicated in Chapter 3, Eva had chosen to live with a Polish partner because she felt he would understand her better than an anglophone Canadian would. Most of her friends were Polish, and she describes herself as living her private life ‘in the Polish community’. Although she did watch English tv and read English newspapers in the home, she always spoke Polish to her partner. As she said, ‘You cannot speak with a Polish person in English. It doesn’t – it’s not – if you try, you always change because it’s too difficult and it’s easier for you to say it in Polish.’ Her home within the Polish community was a place of refuge for Eva, where she was respected and well liked, and where she could lead a relatively independent lifestyle.Eva’s workplace: From immigrant to valued co-workerThe workplace – Munchies – was the only place where Eva had regular exposure to English and practice in English, as she was the only non-English speaker and the only recent immigrant to Canada. All the other employees, worker and management, were anglophone Canadians. Because the work-place was a fast food restaurant, the primary activities were the following: Workers had to take orders from customers, pass these orders on to other workers, take cash from customers, prepare food, clean the restaurant (tables and floors), keep supplies current and communicate with management. The only activity that was not dependent on spoken interaction was cleaning the restaurant and preparing food and drinks. All the other activities required a reasonably good command of English.Eva left the comfort and security of the Italian store because she wanted to practice speaking English. However, when Eva started working at 98 Ident ity and Language LearningMunchies, she was given ‘the hard jobs’ to do, such as cleaning the floors and tables, clearing out the garbage and preparing the drinks. Not only was this solitary work in which she had little contact with anglophones (‘I’m just alone and everybody doing something else – who can I talk to?’), but it was considered a job for ‘stupid’ people. Although Eva was in an anglophone environment, in contact with anglophones, she neither had access to the social networks within the workplace nor access to customers who spoke English. The process by which Eva finally gained access to social networks in the workplace and access to customers was a long and arduous process, intricately bound up with issues of social power. I will discuss, in turn, Eva’s exclusion from the anglophone social network among her co-workers and access to customers who patronized the store, the process whereby she gained acceptance into the social network, and the privileges that accrued to her as a result of her acceptance in the workplace. I will link the analysis to Eva’s opportunities to practice English.Exclusion from anglophones in the workplaceEva understood that, in order to practice English, she had to become part of the social network within the workplace: she had to form social relation-ships and affiliative links with her co-workers. However, the social network was structured in such a way as to privilege those workers whose material and symbolic resources were valued in the workplace. These were the work-ers who had the ‘better’ jobs in the store and fluency in English. Eva felt inadequate with respect to each of these resources. Eva had ‘the heavy job’, a job that nobody wanted to do, a job that carried little status in the work-place. As a result, she felt her co-workers had little respect for her and did not interact with her.E1: I think because when I didn’t talk to them, and they didn’t ask me, maybe they think I’m just like – because I had to do the worst type of work there. It’s normal.B: Why is that, Eva?E: When I started to work there I was on ice-cream and I had to clear out the garbage and nobody wants to do that.Eva had a perceptive understanding of the relationship between the work she did and the standing she had in her workplace community. As a person who had ‘the worst type of work’ clearing out the garbage, she felt she could not claim the right to speak to her co-workers. She explained that a person who had the worst type of job was assumed to be a ‘stupid’ person with little contribution to make to her community.B: I think I asked you in one letter why their [the co-workers’] respect is important to you. Why were you even worried about whether or not they respect you?Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 99E: I don’t want like somebody takes me for a stupid person. Who just came and doesn’t know nothing and cleans the floor –The relevance of such relationships for language learning is clearly articu-lated by Eva in the following words:When I see that I have to do everything and nobody cares about me because – then how can I talk to them? I hear they don’t care about me and I don’t feel to go and smile and talk to them.Eva takes it for granted that, since she is the person with the most undesir-able job, her fellow workers would have little wish to speak to her. They would assume that she is ‘stupid’, and ‘knows nothing’. As Eva says, because her co-workers do not appear to care about her, she herself does not have the confidence to ‘smile and talk’ to them. The lack of opportunity to practice her English is thus partly structured by social rela-tions of power which exclude unskilled workers, supposedly uneducated workers, from language practices in this particular workplace. However, the picture is even more complex than this. At a later stage in the data collection process, Eva made the point that one worker at Munchies had said: ‘I don’t like working with people who aren’t Canadian.’ The fact that Eva was an immigrant with the ‘worst type of job’ exacerbated the mar-ginalization she initially experienced at Munchies. It is important to note, in addition, that Eva’s marginalization had a marked impact on her iden-tity, which in turn limited her opportunities to practice English. Because she did not feel positive about her job, herself and her relationship with others, she could not enter into conversations with fellow workers – indeed, she was not welcome in the social network. Significantly, Eva’s high ‘affective filter’ (Krashen, 1981, 1982) was not an invariant personal-ity trait, but one that was produced within the context of inequitable relations of power in the workplace. Furthermore, Eva had only limited fluency in the English language and could not make herself understood with ease. As she wrote,[Munchies] was the first place that I had to be able to communicate in English. I was having a hard time with understanding, speaking and making conversation with somebody. Many times we were having a break together and they were talking about something. Sometimes I didn’t understand the topic and many times if I did understand, I didn’t know enough correct words to take part in conversation. Having trouble while speaking in English, I meant the time when I said something and the other person couldn’t understand me. Having trouble making conver-sation – the reason it’s the same, my vocabulary was too poor to talk to somebody or to start a conversation.100 Ident ity and Language LearningEva was in the Catch-22 position discussed in Chapter 3. She needed to have command of English in order to gain access to the social networks in the restaurant, but she couldn’t develop fluency without access to these social networks. Thus her limited opportunity to practice English was, para-doxically, also structured by her limited ability to speak it. It is important to note, in addition, that Eva’s exclusion from the social network in the work-place created the conditions for her exploitation.During my day at work we have half an hour break. We are talking about the things which we have to do, and the plans for the day. If we have time left we talk about other things. But usually I don’t talk very much, because the subject is unknown to me, or it’s very stupid, that I wouldn’t talk about it. I think that I should explain it. Another girl which works with me is nineteen years old, and she is little crazy. She talks all the time, and as I wrote the things which she talks about are very stupid. All the workers are listening to her, and laughing with her. But even if she has to do something, she goes and repeats everything to everybody. Instead of her, I have to do everything. They take advantage, because they know that I wouldn’t say anything. . . . After a while, when I started to feel more comfortable in English, they didn’t notice it. I think they didn’t want to notice it. They needed somebody to work while they were talking. They were keeping me busy all the time.Part of the reason why Eva’s exclusion from the social network was tanta-mount to exploitation was her inability to use English to defend her rights. She was acutely conscious of the fact that ‘they takes advantage of me, because they know that I wouldn’t say anything’. Even when Eva became more proficient in English, Eva felt that her co-workers did not think it was in their best interests to recognize it. The social network represents power. Through a process of marginalization, the social network can ensure that undesirable forms of work are done by those who do not have access to the dominant social network in the workplace or the language of power. Under such conditions, Eva’s rights were not respected. Eva was particularly frus-trated by the fact that her co-worker Gail, who was a contemporary (if a few years younger than her), colludes in this oppression. They both had similar job descriptions, but there was no solidarity between them. It was very dis-turbing for Eva that the other workers added insult to injury by respecting Gail more than they respected her. Like the women in Rockhill’s (1987a, 1987b) study, despite her best efforts, Eva felt bad that she had the worst job in the store and was ashamed of her English.Initially, Eva’s access to anglophone customers was as limited as her access to her co-workers. The managers at Munchies had little confidence that Eva could deal with the customers, and would only give her access to the customers if they had no choice. When Eva was given the occasional Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 101opportunity to work on cash, her manager would hover around and make Eva anxious. This in turn would lead to errors in her work. Once again, Eva’s high affective filter was not an invariant personality trait but one that was constructed within inequitable relations of power that limited her ability to speak.E: When I’m at the cash – when somebody goes for the summer – I take the order but the manager she comes and she listens and then I feel like – she’s watching for my mistakes and I already do some mistakes when I say something.B: You mean that makes it worse? You think that makes you nervous?E: Mm – hmm.Eva’s anxiety, however, also arises from her inability to perform both an oral and a literate task simultaneously, that is, to speak to the customers and to write down their orders at the same time. Workers at Munchies are expected to perform both tasks successfully, a real-time task which, Norton Peirce, Swain and Hart (1993) have demonstrated, is a particularly threat-ening one.They [management] – are worried that I might – that my job is not good enough. I wouldn’t speak to the customers because I wouldn’t feel confi-dent to speak to the customers, because I do not have enough time to speak to them. And when for example Gail, she’s like ‘oh hello, how are you?’ she’s a little like this way – and she says something to everybody. But I don’t have time to talk about –Significantly, however, Eva’s lack of confidence and high anxiety does not detract from her investment in learning English. She is not unmotivated to learn English. Despite her beleaguered identity, she has no desire to return to the Italian store, where people respected her work and where she felt com-fortable and confident.It’s – I feel at the [Italian] store – I do not worry about it – how I feel there. I have my job and I, they gave me the important job. They made me that I do this job well. But there [Munchies], when it’s busy I have to do drinks. I have no company. They don’t want to put me with the people, just sometimes when they have to, when they had no choice.Gaining access to anglophones in the workplaceAfter a period of months, Eva had managed to penetrate the boundaries of the social network at work, and also developed confidence dealing with the customers. This success can be partly explained with reference to the kind of activities that the workers engaged in both outside and inside the 102 Ident ity and Language Learningcontext of the workplace and how Eva herself acted upon the social struc-tures of the workplace, resisting marginalization. Like the students in Walsh’s (1991) study, the boys in Willis’s (1977) study and the women in Morgan’s (1997) study, Eva was not content to submit without struggle to her marginalization. She would not accept being positioned as an unedu-cated immigrant in the workplace with nothing to offer her co-workers.With reference to activities outside the workplace, it was company policy at Munchies that about once a month the management would help to sponsor an outing for the workers at the restaurant. It was at these times that Eva was taken outside the workplace where she had been positioned as a ‘stupid’ person, only worthy of the ‘worst kind of job’ to a context in which her youth and charm were valued symbolic resources. It was also on these occasions that Eva’s boyfriend would help provide transportation for her fellow co-workers. Outside the institutional constraints of the workplace, where the nature of the work undertaken by Munchies employees structured to a large extent the social relations of power in the workplace, a different set of relationships began to develop. Eva’s identity in the eyes of her co-workers became more complex and their relationship to her began to change. This in turn opened up greater possibilities for social interaction.B: I know you said here that sometimes the people respect Gail more than you. You think that’s still true?E: Now I don’t feel that much. It might be sometimes. But before it was I felt it more.B: Why? Why do you think they did, Eva?E: Why? I don’t know why. It’s just I feel this.B: Is it because of the work you were doing? You were doing the cleaning of the floors, and things like that?E: For example yesterday when we went out, the manager she said to me, because I am just one year younger than she, ‘You look really different when you are not at work.’ Because when I am at the work I, when I do the hard job, I don’t know, I’m different than like here.Toohey (2000) discusses how one of the subjects in her study with ele-mentary school language learners, a young girl by the name of Julie, recruited both child and adult allies in her attempt to appropriate a more powerful identity in the kindergarten classroom. Toohey notes in particular that Julie’s outside school identity might have influenced her interaction with her anglo-phone peers. In the afternoons, and on the playground, Julie played a great deal with her cousin Agatha, who was proficient in English. Although Agatha was not enrolled in Julie’s morning kindergarten, Toohey argues that this powerful part-time ally, with whom Julie had strong and long-standing ties outside the classroom, may have been important in how other students, as well as her teacher, perceived her. In a similar spirit, it is possible that Eva’s Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 103co-workers began to perceive Eva differently once they recognized that she had useful and desirable allies outside the workplace. They recognized, in effect, that her identity was more complex than they had assumed, and they responded more favourably towards her.With reference to activities that took place inside the restaurant, Eva was gradually given more responsibility at work. As she was given more status and respect in the workplace she felt more comfortable speaking:Situation at work is surprising me, especially today. Usually the man-ager at the morning tells us what we have to do. Then the girl (which I wrote about her) pretends that she is busy all the time. This way I have to do everything. Today the manager gave us the list what we have to do (each of us separately). I was surprised, but the girl was more than me. After that, when I had done everthing, she (the manager) asked me to do the order of vegetables, which we needed. Always I had to do the heavy job, this time was different. It made me feel better. When I feel well, than I can talk to the others. Today I was talking more than usually.Eva explained that it was not that she wanted a job that was better than that of her co-workers, but one in which she would be on an equal footing with them. This in turn would open up possibilities for shared conversation.B: So are you saying that when you are doing a better job you feel you can talk to people?E: Not the better job. It’s not just me who does this job. I don’t want to just stay at the cash. I know it’s not possible. But I want to, to me and Gail we do the same job because we are at the same position there.B: I see. And so in other words when you are both working together you feel better and you can talk, but if you are working on your own and doing something nobody else is doing then obviously you’re finding it difficult to talk –E: Mm – hmm.I pressed Eva on the issue of the relationship between the nature of work undertaken and the opportunities to practice English. She was unequivocal about their interrelationship.B: So Eva, do you think that – really I’m trying to make sense of all this – so really the nature of the work you do has a very important impact on whether or not you speak English or how you feel about speaking English? In other words, the more responsibility you have 104 Ident ity and Language Learningand the more people respect you, the more comfortable you are speaking English to them?E: I think it’s true. Because for example she [the manager] knows that I can do everything – for example prepare, that I have the responsibility to prepare everything that has to be prepared. She like talks to me and I feel like more comfortable than with her, and sometimes when for example, during the break time, she says we have to do this, for example the onions, I already know but she might not know because she cannot notice everything.B: So she respects that you can contribute.E: I can help her, and she knows that.However, Eva did not simply wait for structural relations in the work-place to change, thus facilitating her opportunity to practice English. She herself acted upon the workplace, taking the opportunity to listen to the way her co-workers spoke to the customers, participating in social conversa-tion (to the surprise of her co-workers) and contributing in unexpected ways to the general running of the restaurant. The following extract depicts how Eva would pay attention to the way her co-workers would use English with the customers:E: I started to take orders from them. For example, because for bacon sandwich we have this BLT –B: That’s right, ‘Bacon, lettuce and tomato’.E: Ya, and they don’t understand sometimes what it is, and then I have to explain everything. And it’s hard for me, because for another person who can speak English fluently, it’s not as hard, and I cannot do this all the time – write and speak. During the lunchtime it’s a little bit harder because I know I have to take the orders as fast as I can. But it’s still OK. I learn how the other people explain this and then I learn how to – because I overhear it and I do the same thing. I know it’s correct because it’s from Canadian people.Eva would also claim spaces in conversations with co-workers. Her pur-pose was to introduce her own history and experiences into the workplace in the hope that her symbolic resources would be validated. This surprised her co-workers.B: You were saying, Eva, that you are starting to speak to other people? The other people who work there?E: Ya. Because before –B: Is everybody there Canadian?E: Ya. Because there everybody is Canadian and they would speak to each other, not to me – because – I always was like – they sent me Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 105off to do something else. I felt bad. Now it’s still the same but I have to do something. I try to speak.B: How are you doing that?E: For example, we have a half-hour break. Sometimes – I try to speak. For example, they talk about Canada, what they like here, the places which they like –B: Like to visit? Vacations?E: Ya. Then I started to talk to them about how life is in Europe. Then they started to ask me some questions. But it’s still hard because I cannot explain to them how things, like –B: How do you actually find an opportunity in the conversation to say something. Like, if they’re talking to each other, do you stop them?E: No.B: You wait for a quiet – Then what do you say?E: No. I don’t wait for when they are completely quiet, but when it’s the moment I can say something about what they are talking about.B: When you started doing that were they surprised?E: A little bit.What is in evidence here is Eva’s attempt to be seen, in Bourdieu’s (1977) terms, as a ‘legitimate speaker’ of English. Bourdieu argues that, if an utter-ance is to be an example of legitimate discourse, four conditions need to be met. First, it must be uttered by an appropriate speaker, as opposed to an ‘imposter’: Only a priest, for example, would be authorized to use religious language. Second, it must be uttered in a legitimate situation: Wedding vows, for example, would only be appropriate in a marriage ceremony. Third, it must be addressed to legitimate receivers: A young child, for example, would not be a legitimate receiver of an academic lecture. Fourth, it must be formu-lated in legitimate phonological and syntactic forms. In this interaction, Eva is making astute judgements about the contribution she can make to a con-versation on vacations. Since she cannot talk to her co-workers about vaca-tions in Canada, she chooses to talk about vacations in Europe, a desirable destination for many Canadian travellers. She has judged that her co-workers are legitimate receivers of such an utterance. The situation is a legitimate one and she carefully chooses ‘the moment [she] can say something about what they are talking about’. Though she still finds it hard to express herself in legitimate phonological and syntactic forms, she succeeds in making herself understood. Whether she is considered a legitimate speaker is somewhat unclear: her co-workers were somewhat surprised by her contribution. Nevertheless, they did invite her into the conversation by asking her questions about life in Europe.Eva also tried to gain access to the social network by showing that she was able to make a positive contribution to the lives of her co-workers, to 106 Ident ity and Language Learninghelp in a variety of ways. Eva describes how she was able to help a manager learn some Italian so that the manager could surprise her husband:B: So when you told them a little bit about Europe or whatever, do they then ask you other questions or, how do they respond?E: They ask me a few more other questions and then we were talking about languages. They asked me, because my manager she has got married with an Italian – and I help her with a few words in Italian –B: Just make sure you don’t start speaking Italian at Munchies. Please!E: (laughter) No. She is English, and her husband speaks English. Just she wanted to surprise him.B: Were people impressed that you could also speak Italian?E: mmmm. They already knew before. Maybe they were because they asked me if I can speak another languages and I told them I can understand Russian and I said that I can understand Czech and I learnt for example German and I know almost well the Italian. They were surprised I think.As discussed in Chapter 3, Bremer et al. (1993, 1996) have argued that interaction between target language speakers and language learners is most productive when both parties work actively to achieve understanding. What these data seem to suggest is that, if the target language speaker is as invested in the conversation as the language learner is, she or he may work harder to achieve such understanding. Once Eva had identified which of her resources (e.g. knowledge of Europe or knowledge of multiple languages) was valuable in this context, she was able to reduce the power imbalance between herself and her interlocutors, and speak with greater confidence. Eva also tried to help her co-worker Gail when Gail had fallen behind in her duties. As dis-cussed with reference to Kress’s (1989) work, described in Chapter 1, the power of institutional discourses is such that people learn quickly what it means to be a good colleague, a helpful worker, a model employee. Such helpfulness can be understood as another resource that was valued in the workplace, serving to offset limitations in Eva’s competence in English.When I don’t have a lot of things to clean on the table, and I’m really like, I don’t have nothing to do, when the lunchtime is over and we don’t have to prepare anything we just have to clean – she does, she has for example to clean the dishes and stuff like this, during the time when I’m at tables, when she has a lot of those dishes – then when I get back and I am fin-ished I sometimes help her. And she saw it.The privileges of access to anglophones in the workplaceIn time, Eva gradually gained access to the social network at work. After a few months at Munchies, she described the following conversation that she Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 107had overheard. One worker, turning to another, said in passing, ‘I don’t like working with people who aren’t Canadian.’ When his companion replied ‘Except Eva’, he repeated, ‘Except Eva’. Such data provide unequivocal evidence that, notwithstanding Eva’s initial marginalization at Munchies, she had, over time, succeeded in achieving legitimacy in her workplace.2 As Eva said in one interview, ‘Now I think that they understand that I started to work there because I have no job because there was no possibility for the job because of the economic, because I didn’t know that much English.’ Eva feels that her co-workers no longer think of her as stupid, but as someone who is a victim of circumstance. Her level of competence in English no longer marginalizes her; it is no longer equated with ignorance. On the contrary, it now becomes an explanation for the type of work she has been compelled to do. In other words, while previously the type of work she did was under-stood to be a result of an intrinsic incompetence, it was then perceived as a result of an unfortunate set of circumstances.As Eva became more comfortable and confident with her co-workers, she spoke more English and, as she spoke more English, she became more com-fortable and confident. The relationship between comfort/confidence levels and use of English is an intricate one:B: I’m just trying to kind of imagine. So are you finding at Munchies now that you are speaking more English?E: Ya.B: Why is that?E: Firstly, I have more practice. I feel more comfortable there when I speak. And I’m not that scared anymore to say something. Because before I wasn’t sure if I say something the right way or they like understand me or not – because sometimes I say something but they don’t understand me.B: Do you think it’s because your English has got better that you’ve got more confident or do you think that you’ve got more confident and so you’re speaking more English?E: Mmmm. Both. Both.It is significant that Eva is concerned, not only that she understand her co-workers, but that they understand her. One of the central findings of the ESF project, as discussed in Chapter 3 (Bremer et al., 1993, 1996), is that in most inter-ethnic encounters, it is the learner who bears most of the respon-sibility for ensuring that mutual understanding has been achieved. This can be partly explained by the unequal investments that such interlocutors have in an interaction. Eva is highly invested in the interactions with her co-workers because she is seeking entry into their social networks; without such entry, she will have difficulty improving her English and finding better working conditions: it is the classic Catch-22 situation. Notwithstanding the 108 Ident ity and Language Learningcounter-example given above, in which Eva helped a co-worker to learn some Italian, her co-workers, initially at least, appeared to have little investment in interaction with her.Having gained entrance into the social network, Eva was able to participate in a variety of social interactions that she had not taken part in before: she was no longer powerless in the workplace. In the following extract, Eva indicates that she is now able to inform her co-worker Gail when work had to be done, rather than simply do it all herself. As a result, she is able to resist exploitation. It is interesting that one of the ways in which Eva asserts her rights is through the use of humour. She does not insist that Gail do her fair share of the work; she jokes with Gail and uses a lighthearted tone when speaking to her. Heller and Barker (1988) and Rampton (1995) describe how students use puns and code-switching to break down social boundaries; Eva, likewise, uses humour as conversational strategies to help her communicate her intentions.Now she [Gail] is little bit changing. She’s like aa she – for example today she was doing something and I said to her ‘Gail, we have a lot of things to prepare for the weekend.’ ‘Really, why didn’t you tell me before?’ I said ‘It’s logical, it’s the end of the week!’ And she helped to do everything with me – Because now that I feel she’s more close to me, I feel like I can say ‘Gail, we have to do something!’ But when I don’t know somebody, I think that she doesn’t – like before she was – I couldn’t go to her and say ‘Gail, we’ve got to do something.’The solidarity between Gail and Eva is such that they are able to discuss the possibility of asking for an increase in wages. In this regard, as Goldstein’s (1996) work, described in Chapter 3 has shown, access to social networks does not have only symbolic value, but material consequences as well.B: Do you ever talk about your salary? Do you know what Gail earns?E: Ya. What Gail earns is the same as like me. Just, I cannot ask the manager how much she is paid!B: But you and Gail get about the same?E: Because Gail asked me – we have to ask about the rise together –B: Really?E: We asked and she [the manager] said ‘not yet’. She can’t ask the owner yet because it is too slow and we cannot ask before summer.B: Really? Did Gail suggest that you ask for a raise?E: Mm – hmm.CommentWith reference to SLA theory, it is clear from these data that opportuni-ties to practice English cannot be understood apart from social relations of Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 109power in natural or informal settings. Although Eva had access to anglo-phones in the workplace, she did not initially have access to the workers’ social network or to customers who patronized the store. In this regard, it is not only sustained contact with the dominant community that is important, as advocated by Bremer et al. (1996), but access to social networks within this community. When Eva started working at Munchies, her material and sym-bolic resources were not valued in the workplace. She had a job with low status and she could not express herself adequately in English. Furthermore, she entered a workplace in which there was resistance to immigrants – ‘people who aren’t Canadian’ – and unequal investments in social interaction. Because Eva was marginalized, she could not take part in the language practices in the workplace and was subject to exploitation. Her lack of confidence and anxiety were not invariant personality traits but socially constructed in inequitable relations of power. It was only after a number of months that Eva gained access to the social network in the workplace, and with it the right and oppor-tunity to speak. Such access was gained because Eva acted upon the work-place, refusing to be marginalized, and because the organization of activities for workers outside the workplace gave her the opportunity to distance herself from the identity of an unskilled immigrant.At one diary study meeting, I asked Eva if she felt she was part of Canadian society. Her response was that she felt comfortable in Canada because the people at work liked her and accepted her. The central point here is that it is only in the work environment that Eva had access to Canadians. In many ways, the workplace was Canada for Eva. Because Eva had gained access to the social network at work, she was able to practice English on a regular basis and become a proficient speaker of English. Indeed, she became sufficiently proficient to change her job to that of a waitress at another res-taurant in Newtown where she was required to speak English fluently. In this workplace, not only did she earn more money, but she had a different relation-ship to her customers and increased opportunities to speak English. Eva may not be ‘Canadian’ but, as Eva is no longer marginalized, she is no longer pow-erless. As she herself said: ‘I feel I have the same possibilities as Canadians.’Arguably, Eva is a classic multicultural citizen. She says that she feels comfortable about being Polish in Canada. Polish is the language of the pri-vate sphere; English is the language of the public sphere. Further, if people look at her strangely on occasion, she thinks that is their problem and not hers. When she first arrived in Canada, she would have assumed that, if people treated her with disrespect, it was because of her own limitations. Eva said that the English course had helped her make a head start on the adapta-tion process. ‘It would have taken a lot longer’ if there had been no course. But the most important English teacher for her was ‘real life’. Furthermore, work helped her, not only because of the increased exposure to English and practice in English, but also because she was able to observe how Canadians talk to one another and behave towards one another – how things ‘get done’ 110 Ident ity and Language Learningin Canadian society. At Munchies, Eva’s identity was that of someone who was ‘different but equal’ to her co-workers. Because she was no longer mar-ginalized by her co-workers, because she had their acceptance and respect, she could talk to them, practice her English, and become a good speaker of English. As well, it is significant that Eva not only wanted to be accepted, she wanted her ‘difference’ to be respected: ‘When I started to work there, they couldn’t understand that it might be difficult for me to understand everything and know about everthing what it’s normal for them’, she wrote. This sentiment was echoed another time when she said that the people working with her ‘weren’t able to understand why it’s difficult to come to the other country and not know the language’. Eva wants her co-workers to try to understand her, to accept that she doesn’t know everything that they take for granted. However, she doesn’t want recognition of difference at the price of marginalization.It was disturbing, therefore, that when I saw Eva after the diary study was complete, I learnt that she was still fighting the same battles for respect in the workplace, and that her competence in English still constituted a bar-rier to her acceptance by some Canadians. She told me a story of a male customer who had said to her ‘Are you putting on this accent so that you can get more tips?’ Eva had been angry, but had said to him: ‘I wish I did not have this accent because then I would not have to listen to such comments’. Eva was no longer silenced by ethnocentric comments, she was angered by them. Her identity had changed and, with it, her inclination to speak in the public world.Mai‘I feel so sorry for my parents and my nephews because they can not talk with each other . . . I am always in the middle.’Mai, who had come to Canada for a better future, had great investment in English, not only for the access it gave her to the public world, as was the case with Eva, but also for the power it gave her within the private sphere of the home, where, as a language broker she sought to resist her brother’s patri-archal authority. The opportunities that Mai had to practice English in the home and workplace were structured by highly complex sets of social rela-tionships that underwent significant change over time. Where appropriate, I will contrast Mai’s experiences with those of Eva because there are interest-ing similarities and differences in their experiences. Both Mai and Eva are approximately the same age, landed in Canada at the same time, arrived in Canada without a partner, did not speak any English on arrival in Canada and were the only two of the five women who obtained full-time employ-ment shortly after arrival in Canada. There are important differences Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 111between them, however. Mai is a visible minority in Canada, she lived with an extended family from the time of her arrival in Canada till the time she married, she heard English spoken in her home on a daily basis, and her skills as a seamstress were economically desirable in Canada.Mai’s home: The Tower of BabelMing, the brother with whom Mai lived, had been in Canada for over ten years before Mai arrived. He is at least 10 years older than Mai, is married to a Vietnamese woman called Tan and has three sons. Fourteen-year-old Trong was born in Vietnam, while the other two, Mark (aged 12) and Kevin (aged eight), were born in Canada. The family lives in an opulent neighborhood in Newtown, with large new houses arranged on small, neat lots. Mai’s brother works in a government department and has been financially successful in Canada. Her sister-in-law, Tan, has her own sewing business that she runs from home. Mai and her elderly parents all initially stayed at her brother’s home. The occupants of the house included the two grandparents, the par-ents, the three children and Mai. At the time of Mai’s arrival, a younger brother also lived in the same house, although he moved into another house soon after Mai arrived. Thus, unlike Eva, Mai had a complex set of domestic relationships in her place of residence: She was daughter to her two parents, sister (and sister-in-law) to her brother and his wife, and aunt to her brother’s three sons.Significantly, unlike the case for Eva, three languages were spoken in the home on a continual basis: Vietnamese, Cantonese and English. Mai’s par-ents spoke Vietnamese and Cantonese, but no English. Her brother and sis-ter-in-law spoke Vietnamese and Cantonese; her brother had good command of English, but her sister-in-law spoke only limited English. Her nephews spoke English only. This meant that Mai’s parents and nephews were unable to communicate with one another, and that there was limited communica-tion between Mai’s nephews and their mother. As Mai wrote:It is funny when I think about my family, it’s not too big but always had spoken by three languages. My parents can’t speak English, I had to speak with them in Vietnamese or Chinese. I always spoke Chinese when my family’s friends who are from Toronto came to visit us. They are all Chinese. With my brother and his wife, I spoke Vietnamese because they used to speak with each other by that language. And my nephews, they didn’t know any other language except English. So I spoke English with them although it is the language I spoke more than the other. For me it doesn’t matter when people speak with me in Vietnamese, Chinese or English. The only thing that I feel so sorry for my parents and my neph-ews because they cannot talk with each other. It is very worst in the family. I think I won’t let it happen to my children if I have in my future.112 Ident ity and Language LearningThe patterns of language use in Mai’s home are linked inextricably to social relations of power within the home and Canadian society at large. These relations of power – which have patriarchal, racist and material histo-ries – have contributed in complex ways to the breakdown of the extended family structure in Mai’s home. This breakdown, in turn, has had a marked impact on Mai’s identity, the status of English in the home and the opportu-nities for Mai to practice English. The first set of relationships I will examine is that between Mai’s nephews and their parents. The following conversa-tion describes the limited communication between Tan and her three sons:B: You hear a lot of English here at home?M: Ya I do. For my nephews, they all speaking English, so I’m have to speak with them.B: Now do they speak any Chinese3 or Vietnamese?M: No they don’t.B: Nothing? Nothing at all?M: No.B: Why not? Does your sister-in-law not speak to them in Chinese or Vietnamese?M: No. Because, um, for my sister-in-law she got this business, so she has to speak English, so she didn’t want if she speaks Chinese with her kids, so she will lose her English. So she just try to speak English. My nephews speak better than her because they were born here and they go to school –B: But does she not speak Vietnamese to them?M: No. No. Not at all.I asked Mai how Tan speaks to the boys if the boys do not speak Vietnamese and Tan’s English is so limited. Mai said she hardly does speak to the boys. When she does, it takes a long time to make herself understood and the boys make fun of her efforts. Mai suggested that her brother and his wife are obsessed with making money, so much so that their children call the mother ‘Money’ instead of ‘Mummy’. Mai says that her nephews treat their mother with disrespect because she doesn’t know English, saying to their mother ‘Shut up, Money.’It appears that Tan avoided speaking Vietnamese to her children because she thought her command of English would improve if she spoke English to the boys. Part of her desire to learn English was driven by economic interest. Her children, however, who attended anglophone schools, very soon became more competent in English than she was, and she began to lose her authority over them. The boys, in fact, seemed to exert power over their mother, and used their English as a weapon against her. The disrespect with which they treated their mother seems partly explained by the fact that they observed their own father treating his mother and his sister with disrespect. When Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 113Mai’s brother once chastised the boys for treating their mother badly, Mark, the middle son, said, ‘But then why do you treat Grandmom and Aunt so badly?’ Thus the patriarchal relations of power in the home have influenced the language patterns in the home and exacerbated the intergenerational breakdown.There is another important point to note, however. On the way home from one diary study meeting, Mai discussed how the breakdown of the family structure and the use of English in the home were related to her brother’s perception of Vietnamese and Chinese people in Canada. She said that her brother thinks that Vietnamese and Chinese people are ‘low’ while Canadian people are ‘high’. Even though he himself is Vietnamese/Chinese and his wife is Vietnamese, he doesn’t like the Vietnamese and Chinese people and thinks they are ‘bad people’. Mai said that her nephews have been brought up as Canadians, and have never been encouraged to learn Vietnamese – only the eldest has any understanding of Vietnamese. They have no interest in finding out about Vietnam or Vietnamese people, and have said on occasion that they hate their appearance. Mai says that her brother tries to think he is Canadian but that other people don’t see him that way. He tries to have Canadian rather than Vietnamese friends, treating the two groups very differently. It appears that racist practices in Canadian soci-ety – either covert or overt – have had a deleterious effect on the identities of the members of Mai’s extended family. Such phenomena have been compre-hensively studied in other contexts in North America by such scholars as Wong Fillmore (1991) and McKay and Wong (1996) and will receive further attention in Chapter 6.When Mai and her parents arrived in Canada, it was in this set of rela-tionships that she found herself. English was the language of power in the home, males had authority and Canadians were considered to be superior to Chinese and Vietnamese people. Mai, however, rejected her brother’s patri-archal and racist views. When she arrived in Canada at 21 years of age, she was very comfortable with her Vietnamese and Chinese heritage. She was distressed that her brother wished to obliterate his Vietnamese past and that her nephews cared so little for their heritage. She was struck by the fact that her brother had changed so much and had little respect for his own parents: ‘You can’t just throw away what has been passed down from generation to generation.’ At the same time, however, Mai said that her parents have no voice in Canada. It was for this reason that Mai became subject to her broth-er’s authority. Although she could speak to Tan, Tan seemed to support her husband’s patriarchal authority over Mai. As I will indicate, it was with the nephews that Mai developed a special relationship that was to create oppor-tunities for her to speak English, resist her brother’s patriarchal authority, and redefine her gendered identity.Mai had come to Canada for her ‘life in the future’ but the future that her brother and sister-in-law had in mind for Mai did not coincide with 114 Ident ity and Language LearningMai’s desires. Because Mai wanted to be independent, learn English, drive a car and take an accounting course, she came into conflict with the patri-archal structures in her home. There were many ways in which her brother and sister-in-law attempted to curb her independent spirit. There was verbal pressure: Her brother and sister-in-law said that she was ‘license crazy’, and ridiculed her desire for a ‘driver’s license, an English license an accountant’s license’. Further, they limited her economic independence as she was required to give her brother her regular salary check. As well, they tried to control her personal time. When Mai got home from work every day, she was required to join Tan in the basement and help her with sewing contracts. Finally, they belittled her status as a single woman, saying she was a girl who didn’t need school. ‘Just find a rich young man’, they told her. Indeed, from the moment of Mai’s arrival in Canada, Ming and Tan attempted to find a husband for her. The first person they introduced to her was a relation of Tan, who in fact came to pick Mai up at the airport when she first arrived in Canada. Mai described this meeting in the follow-ing interview:At the night I came here, the first time I came to Canada, he went to airport to pick me up. And after that the second time he came and brought something for me. He want to be my boyfriend. Ya. But, after I knew him, I didn’t want to be that. I don’t want to be. I don’t that he’s stupid but, it is not good way for me. Ya. And I just tell him, ‘If you want me to be your friend, your sister, I’ll be glad to be that, but for the – you want to be my boyfriend – no.’ No, I don’t think so. And for now he says ‘OK, I’ll be your brother.’Mai’s response to this pressure was complex. Sometimes she tried to reason with her brother, saying that she needed to be independent for her future; other times she defended her actions by saying ‘At least I didn’t do any bad thing to anybody.’ Sometimes, Mai said, it was easier to be quiet and say nothing. While Eva often found herself silenced in the workplace, Mai often struggled for respect in the home. It is significant that Mai never challenged her brother directly. She never seemed to question his right to try to control her life, even though she opposed what he was doing; she never challenged the patriarchal structures, but tried to accommodate them while finding alternative routes to independence. Eva, on the other hand, was frustrated by what she understood to be discrimination and abuse of her rights in the workplace. Thus their relationship to the oppression they both experienced was very different. Like many of the women in Rockhill’s study, Mai did not assume that she had the right to independence, she assumed that it was a privilege granted under sufferance.Because of the breakdown of the extended family, and the emotional and material network that had hitherto supported Mai, Mai had to redefine Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 115her relationships within the family. Mai’s parents offered her little support. Her non-English speaking father was no longer the patriarch; Mai said he had no power in Canada. Mai’s mother cleaned the house, did the cooking and spent the rest of her time in her bedroom, alone and alienated from her extended family. Her sister-in-law had no authority in the home, little rela-tionship with her sons and spent her days and evenings in the basement making garments and drapes for clients. In a sense, unless Mai redefined her status in the home, her options were extremely bleak. She could become an economic prisoner in the home, like Tan, with little identity or authority as a member of the family, she could accept a marginalized status as her mother had done or she could claim an alternative status that would provide her with an expanded set of possibilities. Mai chose the last option, despite her brother’s desire to relegate her to Tan’s status or marry her off as quickly as possible.Mai’s strategy was two-fold. First, she found employment outside the home. This enabled her to contribute to the economic welfare of the family and gave her increased opportunities to practice English. Second, as her English improved, particularly after the six-month ESL course, she took on the role of language broker in the home, a status that gave her a measure of power and authority that no other person, apart from her brother, had suc-ceeded in achieving. At a diary study meeting, she described herself as always in the middle, interpreting between her parents and her nephews and occasionally between her nephews and their mother. This gave Mai respect and authority in the eyes of her nephews, who were important allies in Mai’s struggle against her brother’s patriarchal authority. As noted above, it was her nephews who came out in defence of her by asking their father why he treated Mai so badly. They were also impressed because she could speak English better than their mother who had been in Canada for more than ten years. As Mai wrote: ‘One time Trong told me “I hope you won’t be like someone they just care about money then they forget about English. It’s no good in the future.” I understood what he means’. What Mai under-stood was that her nephews resented their mother’s preoccupation with the acquisition of material resources rather than symbolic resources. They were concerned that Mai should not follow in their mother’s footsteps. It was Mai’s friendly relationship with her nephews and her role as a language broker in the home that gave her numerous opportunities to practice English on a regular basis.Thus, although Mai’s brother grew wary of the developing relationship between Mai and his sons, Mai remained an asset in the home. She was more than ‘a girl’: she brought money into the home, she was a language broker in the home, she was able to take care of her nephews and give the parents the freedom to travel. Despite her brother’s ambivalence towards Mai, it was Mai and not the grandparents who took care of the boys when Mai’s brother went to Vietnam for a month. By this time, there was a mutually beneficial 116 Ident ity and Language Learningrelationship between the boys and Mai. As Mai noted, they helped her prac-tice English, and she took care of them:My brother and his wife went to Vietnam 4 weeks go. Since they went I have to take care of my three nephews. I think they must be sad when their parents all gone, that’s why I tried to keep the activity in the house always like they used to be with their parents. All the time I have to make up my mind to think about something that they like to eat. At night, before I went to sleep I went to check two of the younger to make sure that if they okay. And the happy thing I got from them is they all have been very good and listen to me everything that I tell them. They used to ask me when they wanted to go out or do something. The one very helpful to me and my study is Kevin. He is eight and a half years old and he is the third of my nephews. Whenever I asked him to help me for dictation and something else, he is very pleased to help me. He helps me more than the other one. He reads for me to write my dictation. Trong the older one is taking high school, he didn’t have much time to help me. Neither does the second one Mark. I know they all busy. So I didn’t want to bother them. But when I had some problems that Kevin couldn’t explain to me, I had to ask Trong or Mark They all happy to help me and explained to me very clearly.There was an interesting relationship between Mai’s position of language broker and her investment in English. English represented both a weapon against her brother’s patriarchal authority and a symbol of her value in the private and public world. Mai was an extremely diligent language learner – she took every opportunity she could to speak and use the language. She took course after course, despite the extreme inconvenience of attending courses at night, after a long day at work. She practiced at home with her nephews, she regularly attended the diary study meetings, she wrote reams in her diary. When Mai’s brother evicted his parents from his house a year after they had arrived in Canada, Mai’s strategies were rewarded when she was given the option to remain in her brother’s home. Mai captured these trau-matic events in the following words:I am feeling so sad and very lonely now. Tonight will be the last night I am close to my mother. Then tomorrow she’ll move to someone’s house and stay there all the time. She’s going to take care of one child who is six months old. Since I was born until I came here I used to stay with my parents. I couldn’t miss them even ten days. But now, I can’t help when something happen. It hurts me a lot come to think of it. Before we were living in Vietnam we always hoped that we could come here soon to see someone in family that we haven’t seen for long time. Then we’ll stay together and enjoy the time we have. But now so many bad things Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 117 happened to us. It made my parents feel bad, because they never think about something like that happened to them. My parents didn’t feel like to stay in my brother’s house any more . . . Even me, I don’t know where to go now. I am confused about what is going to happen with my parents and I in the future. Around me now all storm and big windy, I am not sure if I am strong enough to standup in this situation.Having examined the language practices in Mai’s home, and how her oppor-tunities to practice English were socially structured, I now examine the kinds of opportunities Mai had to practice English in the workplace, how these opportunities were socially structured and their mutual relationship to Mai’s investment in English.Mai’s workplace: Insider to outsiderWhen the ESL course was complete, Mai worked as a seamstress at a place called The Fabric Factory in Newtown. She was the youngest worker there and the only one from a Vietnamese/Chinese background. There were seven additional workers, all women (‘just only seven girls’) and no native-born Canadian workers. ‘No any one Canadian people’, said Mai. When Mai arrived at the workplace, everyone spoke English communally, although the women were from Italian (four), Portuguese (two) and Indian (one) back-grounds. Only occasionally did one woman speak to another in her mother tongue. ‘Maybe they don’t want us to know something. They cannot help it so, speak really fast.’ As noted in Chapter 3, Goldstein (1996) describes in detail how the immigrant women and men in her study formed an intimate social network in the workplace, where workers referred to one another as sister, brother, daughter. Goldstein argues that in this context, work relation-ships were represented as family and community relationships. For example, a problem concerning a worker who is unhappy with the supervisor was referred to as a family problem. These sets of relationships had a significant influence on the language patterns on the production floor: Portuguese func-tioned as a symbol of solidarity and group membership. The language was associated with the rights, obligations and expectations that members of the community had of one another, including the obligation to help one another keep the line up and cover for slower workers.It was into a set of relationships like this that Mai entered at The Fabric Factory, although the language of solidarity was English. Unlike Eva, Mai did not have difficulty gaining access to the social network in the workplace and had many opportunities to practice English. Unlike Eva, Mai did not have the worst job in the factory. On the contrary, Mai was a highly competent worker and soon gained the respect of both the management and workforce. Unlike the case with Eva, the better jobs were not reserved for those profi-cient in English; all the workers had the same type of job, and none of them 118 Ident ity and Language Learningneeded to be good speakers of English to be competent workers. Furthermore, all Mai’s co-workers were immigrants to Canada. Unlike the case at Eva’s work, Mai was part of the camaraderie among the women. As well, Mai was younger than the other workers in the factory and was affectionately called a young chicken, a little girl by the other workers. In a sense, she was like a daughter to the older, more experienced workers there. Mai in fact referred to the most experienced worker in the factory as ‘the mother of us all’. As in Eva’s case, Mai’s workplace was symbolic of the outside world for Mai; how-ever, it was more than a place where she could have increased exposure to English and practice in English, it was a place that offered her refuge from the tensions of her family life and provided her with the emotional and mate-rial support of a surrogate family.The first time I interviewed Mai in December 1990, she expressed great satisfaction with her work situation. She spoke a lot of English there, had great support from her supervisor, and was loved by the women she worked with.B: So do you speak a lot when you work or do you just sit and work, work, work.M: No, I speak a lot. [laughter] Some days they have to stop me! Because the jobs make me sleepy if we don’t speak. We just listen to the sound of the machine. Something is –B: It makes you sleepy?M: For me not but for someone else. So I just want to make them wake up or something. If I was not very – I was very quiet, and then later on – I get used to everything, those people, and I try to speak more and – Ya. Because I actually want to practice speaking English. And even with my supervisor, I told her before – I’m not very good in speaking English. I hope when I be there so you can teach me some more for reading and writing or speaking. She said ‘yes’ so –B: Is she Canadian? The supervisor?M: She’s Italian. But she come here since she was very young.B: So she speaks good English?M: Ya, she speaks good English.B: Does she speak a lot to you? When you’re working?M: She speaks with me a lot.B: And is she friendly? Is she nice?M: She’s friendly. And other day I got accident she was so worried about me –B: Oh really.M: Ya. I, I’m happy for my factory. Because – they love me.This extract is highly significant. It indicates that the workplace is a very important source of self-esteem for Mai. She is happy when people care Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 119about her and, when she is happy, she can talk a great deal. Unlike the older women in the study, who find solace in their families, and Eva, who has a partner, Mai finds little solace in her extended family; it is in the workplace where she feels competent, has friends who love her and has the opportunity to speak a lot of English. Her own mother no longer has any voice, but Rita, ‘the mother of us all’, has a great deal of power in the factory.When there was enough work for everybody, there was a positive atmo-sphere in the workplace and Mai had no difficulty practicing her English. Things started to go wrong for Mai, however, when the company started feeling the effects of recession and women were laid off work. Because Mai was particularly competent, she was not one of those laid off. But the lay-offs had a marked impact on the social interaction and language patterns on the factory floor and Mai’s opportunities to speak English. As Mai wrote:Something’s happened at work. It made me feel sad and uncomfortable. Today, after we had lunch, Emelia asked two ladies to stay home tomor-row because there isn’t enough job for everybody. Now my boss decides that he can keep only people who know how to make everything from top to bottom. It doesn’t matter how long have they been working here. Everyone in that factory all have been working there at least 8 months. I’m the only one here not so long. Then my supervisor tells me to stay. I know someone else doesn’t like that way. But I can not say anything, it is not my fault, even though those ladies are very upset. They spoke in front of me with each other. One said ‘that’s not fair, how come I stay here longer, now she lays me off?’ The other one says, ‘someone else can’t do everything. Why don’t they lay them off too?’ Then they started to speak their own language, Italian or Portuguese. By the way they look at someone who is still working it was very strange looking. They said a lot of things I couldn’t understand. I don’t know what do they think about me. I just have to do according to my supervisor.The solidarity among the women was lost after the layoff, and the language patterns in the workplace altered dramatically. Except for Mai, the women remaining in the factory were all Italian: Emelia (the supervisor), Rita (the most experienced person) and Ilsa. The others no longer spoke English, they all spoke Italian. Because none of the workers had to speak to clients or cus-tomers, there were no constraints on the use of Italian and the other workers tried to convince Mai to learn Italian. Mai tried to resist this, saying she must learn English, but her co-workers tried to convince her that it would be good for her to understand another language. It is important to note that in this context Mai felt marginalized, not because of her limited command of one of the official languages in Canada, but because of her lack of command of a minority language:120 Ident ity and Language LearningSince last Tuesday, I’ve been working at my factory in a very quiet condi-tion. There were only three people at work. Rita, me and Ilsa with the supervisor. We didn’t like to turn on the radio like we used to. Because they all Italian, that’s why they speak Italian language all the time. Sometimes I feel so lonely like I was working by myself. Then all of them wanted me to learn Italian language. I liked that too at the beginning. Rita taught me how to say thank-you, good morning, understand and how to count from one to ten. It was harder than when I learned English even the pronunciation. One time I told Rita ‘I’m not going to learn any-more, the thing I need now is English language.’ Over there I’m the youngest, so everyone like to tease me and call me by all different names. Rita told me ‘Come on young chicken, it’s good for you to understand some different language.’ She started to speak with me by Italian like when she asked me to do or to get something. At those moments I couldn’t understand what she said. I just stood there with a funny face. When Emelia saw me like that she asked me ‘What happened with the little girl here.’ Then Ilsa explained to her and she burst out laughing. I think Rita was a Fatsy Lady. She can just be happy or get mad at some-one at anytime. But in these few days she has been very nice to me. Sometimes she teach me how to make something by her way. It was easier and faster than the way I did before.After the layoffs, English was no longer the language of power in the work-place, but Italian. This put Mai in an invidious position. If Mai neglected her English, she might lose the little bargaining power she had in the home through her identity as a language broker; yet, if she insisted on speaking English, she might lose the friendship of the people at work. Indeed, not only might she lose their friendship, but she might lose access to their experience and skills, the symbolic resources that would help her to be a more compe-tent worker. As Mai said, Rita helped her to do things easier and faster than the way she had done things before. Such support might be compromised if Mai did not respect the language of power in the workplace. It is significant that when two of the women who had been laid off came back to the work-place to get some paperwork done, they refused to greet Mai. Mai described how one of the women had reluctantly turned to Mai and said to her, in an unfriendly way, that she [Mai] had been allowed to stay because she didn’t have a man. The laid-off workers refused to acknowledge that Mai had been kept on because of her competence and diligence. Their words suggested that, because Mai did not have a husband to provide security for her, she had been saved from dismissal.The social meaning of these words must be understood with reference to the construction of Mai’s gendered identity. In the home, she had strug-gled to resist the patriarchal oppression of a brother who insisted she was a ‘girl’ who didn’t need school, but a rich young man; in the workplace, she Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 121was positioned as a young chicken, a little girl, but ultimately a person whose single status was used to explain the preferential treatment she had received from the management of The Fabric Factory. Like Eva, Mai did not want to have a better job than the others; she did not want preferential treatment; she simply wanted to be treated fairly. However, she became positioned as someone who had received preferential treatment on the grounds of her gendered identity. Within a year, Mai got married. Her hus-band ‘saved’ her from her brother’s patriarchal authority and from the deri-sion of workmates who used her single status as grounds for marginalization. Her husband has given Mai a status in Canada as a wife. How this affects Mai’s exposure to and practice in English has yet to be determined. Her husband does not want her to work outside the home; at best, Mai says, he may ‘let’ her study.CommentWhile for both Eva and for Mai, the workplace represented Canada, their experiences and opportunities to learn in the workplace were radically different. In Eva’s case, her identity shifted from that of an uneducated immigrant woman to that of a valued co-worker. In Mai’s case, her identity shifted from that of a competent, energetic co-worker, to that of a marginal-ized, unattached female. The work of Lave and Wenger (1991) on situated learning provides some insight into the way Eva and Mai were initially positioned in their workplaces and why their identities and learning oppor-tunities shifted over time. Lave and Wenger (1991), working within an anthropological framework, are centrally concerned with the relationship between learning and the social situation in which it occurs. Through a process of what they call legitimate peripheral participation newcomers inter-act with old-timers in a given community setting and become increasingly experienced in the practices that characterize that community. This per-spective is useful in the field of SLA (see for example Toohey, 1998, 2000) because it focuses on the local analysis of communities and insists that learners should be conceptualized as members of social and historical col-lectivities, and not as isolated individuals. Further, Lave and Wenger (1991) call for closer examination of the conditions for learning and for the appro-priation of practices in any given community, recognizing that particular social arrangements in any community may constrain or facilitate move-ment toward fuller participation.In Eva’s workplace community, the constraints initially placed on her movement towards fuller participation were particularly problematic because they violated the expectations that newcomers have when entering a com-munity of practice; that is, the expectations that newcomers will have access to the central practices of that community, in all its forms. As Lave and Wenger (1991, p. 100) note:122 Ident ity and Language LearningThe key to legitimate peripheral participation is access by newcomers to the community of practice and all that membership entails. But though this is essential to the reproduction of the community, it is always problematic at the same time. To become a full member of a community of practice requires access to a wide range of ongoing activ-ity, old-timers, and other members of the community; and to informa-tion, resources and opportunities for participation.What is noteworthy in Eva’s data is the struggle she had to undergo to achieve such access, and how her identity within the community changed as she was given information, resources and opportunities for participation.With regard to Mai, however, she was, in many respects, an old-timer in a new community of practice. She was an experienced seamstress who was immediately identified as someone who could contribute actively to the prac-tices of the community. To the extent that the community met with her expectations, she felt confident and competent, regularly engaging in conver-sation with her co-workers. After the lay-offs, however, it was Mai’s compe-tence that was seen as threatening to her co-workers, and some gradually withdrew from interaction with her. The isolation that she felt had both symbolic and material consequences, as her access to both friendship and expertise was compromised. Such reversals in the relationships between old-timers and newtimers receive little attention in Lave and Wenger (1991) and merit further research. Nevertheless, as I argue in Norton (2001), the com-munity of practice perspective and Wenger’s (1998) recent work on identity, offer much promise for theorizing about second language learning in class-rooms and communities. In the next chapter, we gain greater insight into the practices that characterize the places in which Katarina, Martina and Felicia worked.Notes(1) In all interviews, names are abbreviated: B for Bonny, E for Eva, M for Mai or Martina (depending on context), K for Katarina, and F for Felicia. A dash (–) indicates a pause and square brackets are used for clarificatory comments.(2) It is important to note, however, that she had not succeeded in changing the ethno-centric views held by some of her co-workers towards immigrants in general.(3) I did not at this point in the study acknowledge the differences between the variety of languages spoken in China.Eva and Mai: Old Heads on Young Shoulders 123124Mothers, Migration and Language Learning‘I want you to speak English. Pa hallar buen trabajo tienes que saber hablar el inglés bien. Qué vale toda tu educatión si todavía hablas inglés con un “accent”,’ my mother would say, mortified that I speak English like a Mexican.anzaldúa, 1990, p. 203Theorizing and researching gender and language learning is fraught with complexity. In a comprehensive article on researching gender in language use, Freedman (1997) distinguishes two traditions in research on gender and lan-guage use. The first tradition, associated with the sociolinguistic work of such researchers as Lakoff (1975) and Tannen (1990), focuses on how women and men use speech in social interaction. Lakoff, for example, demonstrates that women are more tentative than men, using tag questions and hedges more frequently than men do. While Tannen would agree with this observa-tion, her analysis of why such differences occur would differ from that of Lakoff in that she would place less emphasis on power differentials between women and men than Lakoff does. The second tradition that Freedman iden-tifies is that associated with the anthropological work of researchers in lan-guage socialization, such as that of Ochs (1992). Ochs argues that linguists should study how gender is constituted through acts, stances and activities associated with culturally preferred gender roles which have context-specific linguistic realizations. She demonstrates, more specifically, how differences in communicative practices across cultures socialize infants and small chil-dren into different local images of women in general and mothers in particular.While both research traditions offer rich possibilities for research on gender and language learning, this chapter proposes an alternative frame-work for thinking about the significance of gender within language learning research. Instead of asking, ‘How do women speak?’ or, ‘What communica-tive practices are associated with culture-specific gender roles?’ I ask ‘Under what conditions do women speak?’ More specifically, I address how an 5 immigrant woman’s gendered identity as mother is implicated in her invest-ment in the target language and her interaction with target language speak-ers. In the previous chapter, there was some evidence that Eva and Mai’s gendered identities as young attached woman and unmarried young woman respectively may have had an important impact on the nature of their rela-tionships with target language speakers in their workplaces. The fact that Eva had a boyfriend who could help drive co-workers to parties may have given Eva greater esteem in the eyes of her co-workers and increase the pos-sibility for social interaction. With regard to Mai, her young, single status was treated with ambivalence in the workplace. On the one hand, some of her co-workers adopted a protective attitude towards her, calling her a young chicken and a little girl, and invited her into their conversations. Others, however, who had been laid off, positioned her as a person who was inade-quate because she did not have a partner. ‘You don’t have a man’, they said, as they turned their backs. In neither case, however, was Mai fully acknowl-edged as an independent woman in her own right.I now wish to focus on the three older women in the study: Katarina, aged 34 when she arrived in Canada, Martina, aged 37, and Felicia, aged 44. Katarina, the youngest of the three older women, had one child who was still in elementary school; both Martina and Felicia had three chil-dren: two teenagers and a preadolescent. All three women had received tertiary education in their home countries, they had all been married in their home countries and had children in their home countries, they had all worked for extended periods of time in their home countries, but none had found jobs in their professions in Canada. The differences between the women are also significant, beginning with their reasons for immi-grating to Canada. Katarina and her family, from Poland, came to Canada because they ‘disliked communism’, preferring instead a capitalistic system, as well as a state with a Christian orientation. Martina on the other hand, from Czechoslovakia, came because she wanted a better life for her children and Felicia came because ‘the terrorism was increasing in Peru’. The women also had very different lifestyles in their home coun-tries. Katarina stressed the fact that she was an educated person who had taught for 17 years. Martina was a surveyor who had worked for the same organization from the time she had finished her post-secondary training. Felicia had been a primary school teacher who had lived a life of luxury in exclusive neighborhoods in Peru, with weekends at the beach cottage. In this chapter I demonstrate that the women’s investment in English and their opportunities to practice English were influenced by their gendered identities as mothers and wives, the disjuncture between the symbolic resources that they had acquired in their home countries and those valued in Canada, and ethnocentric social practices in their new country. I ana-lyze each woman’s experience in turn, drawing comparisons and contrasts across the data.Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 125Katarina‘I choose computer course, not because I have to speak, but because I have to think.’Katarina and her husband have one child, a daughter Maria. When the family arrived in Canada, the daughter was only six years old. From the time of their arrival in Canada, Katarina was concerned that her daughter might lose command of her mother tongue, Polish. Katarina said that when she arrived in Canada she cried every day because she realized that her daughter would grow up speaking English. When asked to explain, she said that she was afraid Maria would grow up speaking another language that Katarina couldn’t speak well. Katarina was afraid that she would lose contact with her daughter. The Polish priest at Katarina’s church confirmed her fears. Katarina said that the priest had strongly urged all his parishioners to speak the mother tongue at home ‘not for patriotic reason, not for love of the language, but for the parents’. He told them that, when the children grow up, and the parents want to talk about things that mean a lot to them, the parents would not be as comfortable in English as they would be in their native tongue. In order to keep contact with the children, he strongly encouraged his parishio-ners to speak their native language in the home. He also said that the chil-dren would always be fluent speakers of English, so the parents did not have to be concerned about their integration into Canadian society.Thus the Polish language meant more to Katarina than a link to the past. It was an essential link to her future: her ongoing relationship with her daughter and her identity as a mother. At one of our first diary study meet-ings, Katarina talked at length about her daughter who was about to have her first communion. Katarina said that she wanted her daughter to have her first communion in Polish because ‘That’s the way I did it. I remember it so well in the long white dress.’ She also said that, if the major communion texts Our Father and The Ten Commandments were in Polish, she could help Maria learn them, but if they were in English, she would have difficulty. Now Maria knows all these texts in Polish. In her diary, Katarina indicated the importance of motherhood to her when she expressed disapproval of women who had gone to the Gulf War, leaving children with fathers: ‘Mothers have been to the war and children at home with fathers. I don’t understand. What is more important, “war” or “children”.’Katarina was in strong support of the heritage language classes run by the local school board and sent her daughter to learn Polish every Saturday morning. She was the only one of the three mothers in the study who indi-cated that she was in strong support of her daughter learning the mother tongue in the regular classroom. There were times, however, when she expressed some concern that Maria seemed to be forgetting her Polish, saying, ‘I started to read Polish to her. She had forgotten the Polish words. After a while, she could read better . . .’ Because of Katarina’s concern about 126 Ident ity and Language Learningher relationship with her daughter, the dominant language in Katarina’s home was Polish. She never spoke English to her daughter or husband, some-thing, echoing Eva, which was a hard thing to do.It is interesting to note the comparisons between the language patterns in Mai’s household with those in Katarina’s. From the outset, Katarina was aware that the use of English in the home may not be in the best interests of the family unit and might drive a wedge between her daughter and herself. When I interviewed Katarina in her home on a number of occasions, it was clear that Katarina felt uncomfortable speaking English in front of her daughter. On one occasion, when Katarina was reading an English text onto the tape recorder, her daughter walked by and said her mother sounded like a child. This was very unsettling for Katarina. The social meaning of this comment for Katarina must be understood with reference to her investment in her identity as a mother and her ongoing relationship with her daughter. She was happy to watch English tv with her daughter, read English newspa-pers and listen to English news programs, but she was adamant that the spoken language in the home should be Polish.In view of the forthcoming discussions on Martina and Felicia, it is important to note that Katarina’s husband had developed good English skills before arriving in Canada. Katarina’s husband had learnt English because the work that he had done in international trade had brought him in contact with anglophones. Katarina said that, when they first arrived in Canada, it was her husband who took on all the responsibility of dealing with the public world, answering telephone calls, speaking to teachers and so forth. Although Katarina’s English improved at a rapid rate, she still has what she calls the poorest English skills in the family. Her daughter is fluent in English and her husband is highly competent. Unlike the experience of many women in Rockhill’s study, Katarina’s husband was supportive of her efforts to learn English. Because he provided enough income for the family’s immediate needs, Katarina could attend school to learn English, and then later to do a computer course. She worked part-time to supplement the family’s income, noting as follows:I have attended the school for the skills course from September 1990. It is possible because my husband works, then I don’t have worry about money for apartment and food. My daughter attends the school from 9 am to 3.30 pm. In this time I have my English course – exactly 9 am–12 am. I only work nine hours a week in the Community Service as a homemaker. For the time being it is a good job for me.Nevertheless, because of her age and domestic responsibilities, Katarina often found it difficult to study. As she wrote, ‘It isn’t easy to study when some-body has finished 30 years and has family. There is a lot of hardships on our way to learn English.’Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 127Although Katarina was reluctant to use English in the home, she never-theless had a great investment in learning the language. She believed that knowledge of English would help her regain the professional status that she had lost when she left Poland. ‘I want life to be normal again, like in Poland’, she said. When asked what her plans for the future were, Katarina referred to her past in Poland, in particular her educational status: ‘In my native country I was a teacher. I studied 17 years.’ Katarina wanted sufficient com-petence in English to secure her the kind of employment that would make life ‘normal’ again. However, Katarina did not want employment that was simply an extension of the work done in the home. She said that when she worked as a dishwasher and kitchen help she felt ‘another’. Katarina wanted to do skilled work done by people who are highly educated and was eager to find employment that would give her a good income, an intellectual chal-lenge and access to social networks of educated Canadians. She chose a com-puter course for upgrading purposes so that she could have contact with people who, as she said, think like her. Likewise, at another time she said, ‘I choose computer course, not because I have to speak, but because I have to think.’It was in her quest for skilled employment that Katarina felt marginal-ized in Canada, not by virtue of being Polish, but by virtue of being an immigrant. Because of her investment in the professional status she had acquired in Poland, Katarina bitterly resisted being positioned as unskilled and uneducated. Like Eva, when Katarina first arrived in Canada, the only employment she could find was in an ‘ethnic’ workplace, in Katarina’s case, a German restaurant where she spoke predominantly German. In one meet-ing she said that the immigration officials think that ‘immigrants must work as a dishwasher for the first ten years they are here: “You are immigrant”’. When Katarina found part-time employment as a homemaker for the Community Service, she saw this type of work as a temporary experience, a good job ‘for the time being’. Ironically, however, this type of work gave her many opportunities to practice speaking English. It brought her into contact with lonely, elderly people who were always grateful for her assistance, assis-tance provided gratis by the Community Service. She worked on a one- to-one basis with her clients and did not need to seek entry into a social network in order to speak English. Her clients welcomed the opportunity to talk to her:I work still at the same place in the Community Service. Yesterday I worked for an older married couple. They were more than 80 years old. How lonely people can be! I didn’t think about it before. A lot of people don’t think about it either. If people are young they are able to do all. Old people very often can’t do nothing. They live by themselves and it is sad for them. There are only photographs of their children and their grand-children in their homes.128 Ident ity and Language LearningIt seems that Katarina was in a position of power relative to the older people she worked for, and never experienced feelings of alienation or inad-equacy in her workplace. On the contrary, she felt sorry for these lonely people who were unable to fend for themselves. She gradually lost feelings of anxiety (‘uptight’) while speaking and did not take offence, for example, when an elderly person asked her why she came to Canada without know-ing English.From September 1990 during my work I have contact with Canadian people. I see myself that each month I’m not so uptight when I speak. I have contact with big variety of speaking. There are people who I under-stand very good but there are people who I have to hear carefully. They speak quickly and unclearly. About a month ago I worked with one Canadian woman, who asked me why I came to Canada without know-ing English. She was 84 years old. Other people with whom I work, try to explain me, when I don’t understand something.Katarina therefore had many opportunities to practice English. She attributes this to the fact that she has contact with a lot of people and indicated that her work helped her to improve her English: ‘I have contact with Canadian people. I speak with them. I sometimes call to my supervisor. I have to listen what Canadian people tell me and I have to give answers.’ She also com-mented that after the ESL course, her spoken English was very poor: ‘I had understood all tenses, but their using were difficult.’ On 17 February 1991, she remarked on the progress she had made in learning English by comparing two interviews she had had in the previous six months:On Wednesday I had interview in Ontario College in Newtown. I am going to take after [skills] course, Computer Programmer Course. I don’t have to pass an examination of mathematics. I only have to pass an exam of English. I can compare this interview with another which I have had six months ago. The first interview took place in the Community Service. I wasn’t able to tell a lot about myself after ESL course during that interview. On Wednesday I was able to ask and understand about my course, about another course and requirements for these courses.In sum, although Katarina had an ambivalent attitude towards English because of the threat it posed to her relationship with her daughter, she was very eager to learn it so that she could become part of a social network of people who would value the professional status she had acquired in Poland – people who would think as she does. She wanted a normal life again, where she could enjoy respect from educated people. She went so far as to change her profession because of her need to find stimulation in her work, and to meet like-minded people. Unlike the subjects in Rockhill’s study who Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 129wanted to move out of the factory and find ‘clean work’, Katarina already had a history of clean work and wanted to return to it. Katarina’s story indi-cates that a language learner’s investment in the target language must be understood with reference to class structures as well as gender and race. While Eva’s data highlights the relationship between ethnocentricism and language learning, and Mai’s data highlights the relationship between lan-guage learning and patriarchy, Katarina’s draws attention to the relationship between language learning and class relations.In Poland, Katarina and her husband had achieved status and respect as members of a professional class of people, who had high levels of responsibil-ity in their work and relative autonomy. In this context, it was their educa-tion that had given them access to power and prestige. When Katarina and her family arrived in Canada, their primary concern was to regain a similar class position in Canada, and they turned to education to offer them this opportunity. Because of her lack of fluency in English, Katarina assumed that she would not be able to find employment as a teacher in Canada, and there-fore sought out a profession, computer science, that would accommodate her second language skills. She was prepared to forgo full-time job opportunities in unskilled work, and use the family’s resources to pay for her 18-month computer course, in the hope of achieving long-term job satisfaction. Both she and her husband shared these goals. English, for Katarina, was perceived as a resource that would secure for her the educational training that she sought, and ultimately a responsible job in which she could work autono-mously. She was not interested, as she said, in learning ‘72 definitions for test’; she was not primarily interested in learning English so that she could speak. She was interested in learning English so that she could work in a stimulating job and form a set of relationships with people of her profes-sional class.I do not think it is coincidental that the person Katarina befriended in the ESL class was Felicia, a former teacher. Indeed, there were times when I perceived that Katarina had an ambivalent relationship to me – a fellow professional, a woman, and a mother, but someone who had come to Canada with the linguistic resources to secure professional work in the country. In one telephone call, for example, she said to me, ‘Imagine you in Poland or Russia as a dishwasher, homemaker – You don’t have problems with the language. You don’t have to struggle with the language.’ Nevertheless, Katarina was sufficiently comfortable to utilize the resources that I willingly offered. I helped both Katarina and her husband prepare résumés when they were looking for jobs, had a number of discussions with Katarina about appropriate schooling for her daughter, and tried to help her find employ-ment in the computer industry. During the data collection period, I sensed that Katarina felt her life was on hold, and that everything she was doing in Canada was a temporary diversion in the trajectory of her life. Ironically, perhaps, one of the main reasons why Katarina’s English improved is likely 130 Ident ity and Language Learningbecause of her regular contact with people who were not active professionals. While Katarina says that she feels uncomfortable talking to people who are teachers and doctors, she feels very comfortable talking to the people she tends in her homemaking job. This gives her many opportunities to practice English in the informal context of her workplace. In Chapter 7 I will discuss in some detail how Katarina’s investment in her professional identity leads to disruption in her learning of English in the formal context of the school.Martina‘If I want to learn, I must do it by myself.’When Martina and her family arrived in Canada, neither Martina nor her husband Petr knew any English. Her children, however, had learnt some English in Austria while they were waiting for their Canadian visas. Initially, Martina was dependent on her children to perform the public/private tasks of settling into a new country. Unlike Katarina, Martina could not rely on her husband to perform these tasks because his English was as limited as hers was. When Martina went looking for a job, she took her eldest daughter with her, even though her daughter would cry because nobody wanted to employ her mother. When Martina wanted to help serve customers at Fast Foods, she asked her daughters to tell her what words to use. As Martina’s English improved, she took on more and more of the public/private tasks in the home. Many of Martina’s diary entries describe the way that she used English to perform a wide variety of tasks in the home and community. It was Martina rather than her husband Petr who did most of the organization in the family, such as finding accommodation, organizing telephones, buying appliances and finding schools for the children. She helped her children in many ways. She took over the paper rounds for her son Milos when he was ill, accompanied her daughter to her TOEFL exam and bought stationery for the children. Martina also helped her husband to perform public tasks in English. When Petr was laid off work, he relied on Martina to help him apply for unemployment insurance and he asked Martina to help him pre-pare for his plumber’s certificate by translating the preparation book from English to Polish.I suggest that Martina’s investment in English was largely structured by an identity as primary caregiver in the family. She wanted to learn English so that she could take over the private/public tasks of the home from her children. The very reason why Martina and Petr came to Canada was to find a better life for their children. Martina was anxious not to jeopardize the children’s future by having them take on more domestic and public tasks than were absolutely necessary. As well, because Martina had the responsibility for dealing with the public world, she was also anxious to understand the Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 131Canadian way of life – how things get done in Canadian society. Unlike Katarina, she could not rely on her husband to do this; indeed, her knowledge of English served as a resource for her husband. Like Katarina, Martina also wanted to learn English so that she could find a professional job for herself in Canada. However, as I will demonstrate, the conditions of possibility were more constrained in Martina’s case than in Katarina’s.In the community in which Martina lived there were few anglo-phones with whom she could practice speaking English. As Martina said in an interview:M: I never heard English in this building.B: Really.M: Because in this door live some Chinese. They’ve been in Canada maybe nine years, but when they open door, they talk Chinese or Vietnamese, I don’t know. And always if we open I heard the washer room Polish, or sometime Yugoslavish, or Portuguese or – I don’t know what language. But it is not English. Maybe they are some English but I didn’t see if it’s one family or two –B: Really Martina. So there are a lot of immigrants here.M: Yes. I think because this building is quite a cheap. There are a lot of immigrants because a lot of people move in and move out.Although there were few anglophone resources in her immediate com-munity that Martina could draw on, Martina, like Mai, made use of her family’s resources to help her to practice English. Her daughters taught her how to deal with customers, she would borrow her children’s books from school and try to read them, her children would bring her books from the library and she would occasionally test her children on the work that she was doing in her skills course. Martina would also make superfluous phone calls to practice her English. For example, when her husband Petr wanted to sign up for an English course in Winchester, Martina decided to phone a number of schoolboards to practice her query. As she said,About two weeks ago I called to the Separate School Board in Winchester and I asked for a booklet of the schools. I got it and then I tried to find some evening ESL course for Petr. They told me that I have to call on Wednesday about 6 o’clock. Then I tried to call some schools in Newtown for practise.Because Martina was the primary caregiver in the home, she could not – would not – succumb to the nervousness and anxiety that she often felt when dealing with Canadians. She couldn’t give up. Despite what might be considered to be a high affective filter, she refused to be silenced. Her identity as mother was more powerful than her identity as immigrant:132 Ident ity and Language LearningThe first time I was very nervous and afraid to talk on the phone. When the phone rang, everybody in my family was busy, and my daughter had to answer it. After ESL course when we moved and our landlords tried to persuade me that we have to pay for whole year, I got upset and I talked with him on the phone over one hour and I didn’t think about the tenses rules. I had known that I couldn’t give up. My children were very sur-prised when they heard me.Like Katarina, Martina wanted to be a good mother, but she did not define her motherhood in the same way that Katarina did. Unlike Katarina, she saw little threat that English would undermine her relationship with her chil-dren. She did not mind, for example, if her children did not learn Czech at school. ‘My children say if we learn Czech at home it’s enough.’ An explana-tion for Martina’s position may be that her children are older than Katarina’s one child, and that their command of Czech is fully developed. Her children are young adults and have already undergone primary socialization by their parents. Furthermore, since Martina has taken over many of the public/pri-vate tasks in the home and is more organized and capable than her husband, Petr, she has an authority and esteem in the home that is not shared by Katarina or Mai’s sister-in-law, Tan.As the primary caregiver in the family, Martina was not only interested in practicing English, but in understanding how Canadians conduct them-selves in the public world. Martina and her family had a number of unfor-tunate experiences in Canada as a result of unscrupulous landlords and appliance dealers. However, she did not passively accept the exploitation she had experienced, but actively sought a variety of methods to investigate the Canadian way of life. Since she had little contact with Canadians in general, she turned to television soap operas for guidance, writing as follows:Why I chose ‘One life to live’ is a long story. When we came to Austria everybody told us that they didn’t like the immigrants, but I met a lot of people who liked us. Not everybody is the same. The first month in Austria during the ‘steel days’1 we got the washer, the iron and other things. They weren’t new, but we could use them. First month in Canada was very difficult, because we weren’t able to communicate and understand. When we bought the refrigerator – it didn’t work, it warmed up. Every second week a repairman came and after one week it stopped to work again. Then we decided to return it and we asked for a small freezer but they didn’t have one. The manager told my daughter that she must wait and call every month. I was very disappointed and I wanted to know something about Canadians. First time we watch ‘Who’s the boss?’ or ‘The Cosby show’ – it was funny, but I was look-ing for something else. After the ESL course when I had the interview, Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 133they asked me very different questions, the ones that we didn’t study in school and I was very surprised. Then I started to watch ‘All my children’ – not every day – and ‘One life to live’. In both soap operas there are stories from actual people’s experiences and very few from work. There are different personalities. The life is full of love, hate, danger and lies. When I told these stories to my children I use some English phrases – leave me alone, what’s going on, etc. These phrases sound better in English.Martina explained to me that she was fascinated by soap operas in Canada because they were so different from the kind of soap operas she would watch in Czechoslovakia. In her native country, all the television shows depicted hard-working people devoted to the service of the state’s economy. She jok-ingly told me that Petr said his hands got sore just watching Czechoslovakian tv. Canadian soap operas, in contrast, only used work as a backdrop to the domestic lives of the characters in the soap operas – lives that were filled with love, hate, danger and lies. These soap operas, Martina said, helped her to make sense of the experiences she had had in Canada. In addition, they gave her much exposure to spoken English and were relatively easy to understand.Like Katarina, Martina was anxious to find employment in a job in which she could practice her English on a regular basis and utilize the skills that she had acquired in her native country. However, her search for employment as a surveyor proved fruitless. She attributes her lack of success to ethnocentric practices in Canada. ‘Because of my accent, some people treat me as if I am less worthy than they are (especially when I was looking for a job)’, she wrote. As she understands it, an immigrant is someone who is less worthy than Canadians. Although conscious of this marginalization, Martina does not seem to resist it. In fact, she appears sympathetic to Canadians who are ‘fed up’ with people who can’t speak English. She says that both her limited com-mand of English and her lack of Canadian experience are handicaps. Significantly, Martina believes that one of the reasons why she was unable to find a job in her profession was her lack of understanding of Canadian cul-tural practices, noting as such in the following interview:M: I heard that in Canada you have to – sell yourself –.B: Exactly. Exactly.M: But I’m not the person. I never had problems with work because when I finish the school and I only fill the application at school and the school give us a company who had to keep us. And I work for one company for 16 years, and all the time only different branches.Martina said she did not know how to market herself correctly. In this regard, she explained that the knowledge that she has brought with her from 134 Ident ity and Language LearningCzechoslovakia on how to conduct a job interview did not seem appropriate in the Canadian context:I was there, I had interview about two hours long. They want to know everything about me. They asked different questions. I never heard these questions. Some question was ‘What I will do if the boss was shouting at me.’ And I was very surprised. I thought ‘My boss never, never shouted at me.’ And I don’t know, I said ‘If I do something bad, I try to do better. And I will apologize.’ But I don’t know because never, never, I don’t think about it.Martina’s limited knowledge of Canadian cultural practices mitigates against the possibility of getting a job in which she is competent, a job that will give her the opportunity to practice English with her co-workers. As Eva and Mai’s experiences indicate, competence in a job gives a person a great deal of symbolic capital that carries with it the right to speak and converse in the workplace.Because Martina was unable to get a job that does justice to her skills, she was prepared to take on unskilled work (kitchen help, cashier) while she attempted to improve her spoken English. She did not seem to have as much resistance as Katarina had to doing such work. It may be that she simply has fewer choices than Katarina – her husband Petr, a plumber, was constantly worried that he would become unemployed – and in fact, was laid off once the family moved to Winchester. In addition, Martina seemed to accept that her age made her less mobile than a younger person, and that getting a job in her profession would be difficult because of her second language skills and her lack of Canadian experience. Her major priority was not to join the Canadian professional classes, but to ensure the immediate survival of her family.Although Martina sometimes despaired that she would ‘clean all [her] life’, she thought that this was preferable to remaining at home under depressing conditions. Although at home she had exposure to English through television and reading, these activities did not give her practice in speaking English. However, the kind of work that was available to Martina had given her little access to anglophone social networks. When she was working as a kitchen help at Fast Foods, the only people she came in contact with were her manager and the young part-time workers. While the manager and the part-time workers had a social relationship, Martina was excluded from interaction with them. Like Eva, she did not have the symbolic capital to enter the social network in the workplace, and she only had access to customers through her own initia-tive. It is important to note, however, that Martina did actively take initiative – she did not passively accept her marginalization, writing as follows:My experiences with young Canadians were very bad, maybe I didn’t have fortune. Usually I worked only with my manager, but when was Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 135P.A. day or some holidays for students, the manager stayed in his office and I worked with some students. Very often I worked with two sisters Jennifer (12 years) and Vicky (15 years) and the assistant man-ager who was on cash. These two girls loved talking but not with me. Even though I was very busy, they talked with young customers and laughed and sometimes looked at me. I didn’t know if they laughed at me or not. When we didn’t have any customers, they went to the man-ager office and tried to help the manager with ‘wheel of fortune’ on the computer. Later when some customers came in and I called these girls, they went but they made faces. I felt bad and I wanted to avoid this situation. In the evening I asked my daughter what I had to tell the customer. She answered me ‘May I help you’ then ‘pardon’ and ‘something else’. When I tried first time to talk to two customers alone, they looked at me strangely, but I didn’t give up. I gave them everything they wanted and then I went looking for the girls and I told them as usually only ‘cash’. They were surprised but they didn’t say anything. I tried doing that only a few times because I didn’t have more chances.Martina’s marginalization, however, may have been exacerbated by the fact that she was a lot older than her co-workers. As she said:In restaurant was working a lot of children but the children always thought that I am – I don’t know – maybe some broom or something. They always said ‘Go and clean the living room’, and I was washing the dishes and they didn’t do nothing. They talked to each other and they thought that I had to do everything. And I said ‘No’. The girl is only 12 years old. She is younger than my son. I said ‘No, you are doing nothing. You can go and clean the tables or something.’This comment, I think, is highly significant. It depicts very clearly that a learner’s identity is not only constituted by social interaction, but also con-stitutive of social interaction. Martina’s identity as mother in the private sphere of her life leads her to situate the actions and comments of her younger co-workers in the public sphere within a domestic framework. She positions her co-workers as children, younger than her own, who have no right to give orders to her. The social meaning Martina attributed to the children’s words and actions must therefore be understood with reference to the construction of Martina’s identity across social space. This is an issue that will be dis-cussed further in Chapter 6.Despite the fact the Martina worked very diligently and conscien-tiously at Fast Foods for a period of eight months, she was nevertheless almost invisible there. When, for example, she needed to get a reference from Fast Foods so that she could get accommodation for her family, 136 Ident ity and Language Learningnobody at Fast Foods acknowledged her existence. She explained this in an interview with me:M: When we moved they [the landlords] want some reference. Then I said, ‘Can they [Fast Foods] give me reference?’ because I was working for eight months. And if they tell me – I work from 6.30 to 2 or 3 o’clock – and if some student didn’t come, they said, ‘If I can stay for one or two hours?’ I don’t have any problem because when children come home – I always cook in the evening and when they come they only heat up little. I said ‘It’s OK.’ Then I decided to put the Fast Foods on the application form, for this apartment. Then the manager called them. They said I never worked at the restaurant. Then the manager called me: ‘I lie.’ And I said ‘No, it’s true,’ and I bring them three checks, and then he believes me. But it was so –B: TerribleM: – bad because I said ‘oh, what am I supposed to do because –’B: Why did they say that Martina?M: Because they said that in Fast Foods they always telephone for some students, and maybe the students was working for short time, and when somebody asks ‘No, no, she’s not working. I never met her. Bye bye.’ And we saw that we couldn’t find any apartment because if we put – because they want know if we work, what we are for people.One of the ways in which things get done in Canadian society is through the practice of providing personal references to help a person secure a job, accommodation, a bank loan. As a newcomer, however, Martina and her family did not have access to a network of social contacts who could verify what they were ‘for people’. However, even though Martina had worked in a Canadian institution for eight months, she could not rely on her co-workers or management to respect this cultural practice. Such marginalization must be understood with reference to inequitable relations of power in Canada which sometimes render immigrants voiceless and invisible. Indeed, when one company asked Martina if she had a Canadian friend, the only person who came to Martina’s mind was me. Martina believes that only time, hard work and courage will make a difference in their lives.In sum, Martina’s primary investment in English was to help her secure the survival of her family and a better life for her children. Her identity as mother and primary caregiver was one which structured her relationship to both the private and the public world and had a marked impact on the ways she created opportunities to practice English interact in the workplace. As primary caregiver in the family, Martina learnt very soon that in Canada ‘you have to do things yourself’. Martina said, for example, that her children had never received English grammar lessons at school: ‘They studied from Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 137books on their own. If I want to learn, I must do it by myself.’ It was with great initiative that Martina took it upon herself to create opportunities to speak English and to learn about Canadian society. From attending ESL classes to making practice telephone calls and watching soap operas, Martina persevered in her efforts. Marginalization did not silence her. She knew she could not give up.Despite the fact that Martina showed remarkable resourcefulness and progress in her second language learning, she frequently referred to herself as stupid and inferior because she could not speak English fluently. She said she was stupid for directing a telephone installer to the kitchen when he requested the use of the bathroom; she was stupid because she worked for four dollars an hour as a kitchen help; she was stupid because she took on extra tasks to help out her manager; she was inferior because she was not able to speak English fluently. Although marginalization did not silence Martina, she seemed to accept being positioned as an immigrant. Indeed, she appears sympathetic to anglophone Canadians, saying ‘Some Canadians are fed up with people who are not able to communicate well English.’ My understanding of Martina’s position is that she believes that progress and success in life are a function of an individual’s own capability and courage and not a function of larger, structural possibilities. Successful people are those who take initiative and ‘do things yourself’. By extension, failure must be attributed to personal inadequacy or individual failure. It is for this reason, I think, that Martina had little resentment towards Canadians or Canadian social institutions, despite her marginalized status, and believed that Canada is a good country for immigrants. In order to succeed, an immi-grant needs to work hard, be patient and have courage. Given this position, Martina was often bewildered when confronted with evidence that seemed to contradict her vision of Canada. She did not expect landlords to exploit her, appliance dealers to deceive her, employers and co-workers to ignore her and management to terminate her husband’s employment. Despite her cour-age and her initiative in learning and practicing English, Martina felt that she has not found acceptance and respect in Canada. Indeed, she did feel some ambivalence about the family’s decision to immigrate. Nevertheless, she has not given up. The last news of Martina was that she had taken a tax preparation course, graduating top of her class with 99%. Her eldest daugh-ter has been accepted to do a professional degree at a university, and her two younger children were doing well at school. Her courage may yet be vindicated.Felicia‘I’ve never felt an immigrant in Canada, just as a foreigner person who lives here by accident.’138 Ident ity and Language LearningIn Peru, Felicia had a relatively comfortable identity as the wife of a success-ful businessperson. They lived in the most exclusive part of town, owned a beach cottage, travelled and sent their children to private schools. However, because of the nature of her husband’s work, her husband was subject to death threats and lived in fear for his life. It was for this reason that the family decided to leave Peru and settle in Canada, because ‘the terrorism was increasing in Peru’. The transition from Peru to Canada was extremely dif-ficult for Felicia, who was very unhappy that they immigrated. Felicia thinks she and her husband were duped by the local authorities in Peru who encour-aged them to come to Canada. What has made the transition particularly difficult is the fact that Felicia’s husband did not manage to get a good job in Canada, which led to a substantial change in the family’s quality of life. As Felicia wrote:We downed our standard of living in Canada. We used to have a relaxed life in our country. My husband had a very good job. Canada doesn’t give my husband the opportunity to work. I never will understand why the government gave him the professional visa.Felicia has had to make many adjustments after the opulent lifestyle she led in Peru, saying life is very hard in Canada: ‘It is just work, work, work.’ In Peru the family would spend weekends at their beach cottage, but now they spend the weekends delivering flyers. How her changed class position affects Felicia’s investment in English and practice of English is a highly complex issue and must be understood with reference to the construction of Felicia’s identity. As indicated in Chapter 3, Felicia draws a distinction between dif-ferent classes of immigrants: those who ‘never had anything’ in their coun-tries of origin and those who were ‘professional people and wealthy people’. She argues that people who never had anything are happy in Canada because they are not selective in their choice of work and can ultimately accumulate material goods. However, professional people lose rather than gain when immigrating to Canada because they are not as welcome here as they expected they would be. In Felicia’s view, the Canadian government wants immigrants to spend a lot of money, but does not offer compensatory opportunities for them. Felicia bitterly resents the fact that the symbolic and material resources she and her family had enjoyed in Peru have little meaning in the Canadian context. As Connell et al. (1982) have argued, it is not who people are or what they own that is central to an understanding of class relationships. Rather, it is what people do with their resources that is significant. Felicia is resentful that, while the family does have symbolic resources in the form of skills and education, they have struggled to utilize these resources to maintain the class position that they had established in their home country. Felicia’s husband submitted hundreds of résumés to prospective employers, contacted corporate headhunters and asked friends Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 139for assistance in his quest for employment. I, for example, was asked to review his résumé and introduce him to headhunters. I also helped Felicia find a childcare position at a local school. It is interesting that the only two women who used me as a resource (rather than simply a reference) were Katarina and Felicia, both of whom had vested interests in professional class relationships.In Peru, Felicia’s own status, self-esteem and material prosperity were associated with her husband’s occupation and income. Since the birth of her children over 15 years prior to their immigration, Felicia had not worked in her profession as a teacher, and was a full-time homemaker. The only employment that Felicia was able to get in Canada was to deliver flyers and take care of children. When she arrived in Canada, and her husband could not find a job, there was little that Felicia could do to help either her husband or her family, organizationally or materially. At one time, Felicia ruefully declared that everybody in her family had some talents and achievements except her, ‘whose English is poor’. Like Katarina’s husband, Felicia’s hus-band had developed good English skills before arriving in Canada. Her hus-band had gone to an English-medium school in Peru, and his work had brought him in contact with anglophones in the international arena. When Felicia was growing up in Peru, it was not deemed necessary for women to learn English, and Felicia had gone to a convent where Spanish was the medium of instruction. In English she learnt ‘the verb “to be” and nothing else’. She said that in Peru English has become very important, given the influence of television, international communication and business, and her children had gone to a private English-medium school in Peru. Both her hus-band and children were therefore competent speakers of English before emi-grating from Peru. Consequently, when Felicia arrived in Canada, her husband took on the responsibility of communicating with the public world. Unlike the situation in Martina’s home, Felicia’s family was not dependent on her English skills for a better life. English therefore did not have the same value for Felicia as it did for Martina, who was responsible for communicat-ing with the public world in order to ensure the adequate functioning of the family. Further, unlike Katarina and like Martina, English did not represent a threat to her relationship with her daughter and two sons. In Felicia’s home, Spanish was consistently used as the language of the home. Apart from the parents, the two older boys always used Spanish, as did the younger daughter. Felicia did not express any anxiety that her daughter would lose command over her mother tongue; she was confident that her daughter had enough support from all members of the family to pursue her knowledge of Spanish. As a result, like Martina, Felicia did not feel strongly that her chil-dren should learn their mother tongue at school or that English would threaten her relationship with her young daughter.Felicia could not claim membership of the professional classes in Canada, nor was she comfortable with her lower standard of living, despite the fact 140 Ident ity and Language Learningthat Canada provided a society in which ‘there is not terrorism or many thiefs’. Felicia attributed their unfortunate circumstances to the fact that Canada is not a friendly country. Indeed, Felicia gradually came to the conclusion that she was being positioned as an immigrant in Canada, a posi-tion, as indicated in the following extract, that she bitterly resented:Sometimes, I perceive that some Canadians look down at the immi-grants, I don’t know why, if ALL Canadians came from other countries too. Canada is formed from immigrants . . . Canadians think that here there isn’t discrimination, but I don’t think so. I hope that, in the future, I could change my mind.Like Katarina, who also had great investment in the class position she had held in her home country, Felicia vehemently resisted being positioned as an immigrant in Canadian society. Katarina and Felicia both perceived that if they were positioned as immigrants they would be denied access to the social networks that they felt appropriate for their educational level and material status respectively. While Katarina resisted the immigrant label by pursuing educational goals, Felicia, who was ten years older than Katarina, felt less able to begin a new professional life. For this reason, Felicia retreated into an identity as a wealthy Peruvian, rejecting entirely any identification with her immigrant status. As she poignantly said, ‘I’ve never felt an immi-grant in Canada, just as a foreigner person who lives here by accident.’ A ‘foreigner person’, like a tourist, is someone who is not subject to the social relations of power in the host country – she or he is a temporary sojourner, and has an independence and mobility that an immigrant does not have. Foreign people can thus relate to their hosts from a position of strength rather than a position of weakness. Felicia nurtures her Peruvian identity, has many Peruvian friends and likes to be known by her fellow workers as a friend from Peru.How this identity impacts on Felicia’s investment in English and oppor-tunities to speak English is significant. To the extent that her Peruvian iden-tity is validated, Felicia feels comfortable speaking English; if this identity is not validated, if she is positioned as an immigrant, Felicia is silenced. It is for this reason that Felicia feels most comfortable speaking to people she knows well. These are the people who have familiarity with her history and her Peruvian identity and would not dismiss her as an immigrant. The situ-ation that she finds most comfortable is to meet regularly with another language learner on a one-to-one language exchange in her home. Felicia describes how, in their weekly meetings, they practice their mutual target languages.Like always we could speak very well. I feel very well talking with her, because she motivates my English and she is patient; she is interested in Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 141everything that I tell her. She has the same problem with her Spanish and it is good for both of us to feel comfortable.With strangers, however, Felicia feels very uncomfortable. For example, she avoids speaking to the people in her apartment building. It seems she would rather be thought of as a timid or unfriendly person than an immigrant.In my building, live many senior people and when I meet them at the elevator always they tell me something about the weather or any other thing, but I answer with short answers because I can’t talk fluently and fast. I think that maybe I look like a timid or unfriendly person.Given her investment in her Peruvian identity, I think it is also highly signifi-cant that Felicia says ‘I feel uncomfortable with new people and never can speak English in front of Peruvian people who speak English correctly.’ Felicia would vehemently resist any unfavorable comparisons between her-self and the class of Peruvians with whom she would like most to be associ-ated – a phenomenon I will discuss more fully in the next chapter. As Connell et al. (1982) have argued, class is not a system of categories, but a system of relationships between people.In her workplace at the Fair Lawns Recreational Centre, a centre that is located in an opulent part of town, Felicia has succeeded in projecting an identity of a wealthy Peruvian. Her co-workers, who live in the neighbor-hood of the recreational centre, know that she owns property in Peru, that she wants to buy a house in Newtown, and that she has three successful children and a professional (if unemployed) husband:I was talking with the ladies who work with me about a land that I’m selling in Peru. Last month there was a person interested to buy it. My sister-in-law was talking with her for many days, and called me by tele-phone collect, receiving my instructions to sell, but at last the lady didn’t buy the land. And I have to pay about $600 for calls.The women at this centre seem to have welcomed Felicia – a visitor rather than an immigrant – into their social network. They invite her home for dinner, discuss Peruvian news items with her, and are very patient with her English. Indeed, Felicia indicates that her progress in English can be attrib-uted to the women she works with at this centre. It appears that Felicia’s strategy of asserting her Peruvian identity has been vindicated, at least with respect to the opportunities available to her to practice English. However, although Felicia does interact with the women at work and has many oppor-tunities to talk, it appears that her role is a relatively passive one. She tends to listen more than she talks: She does not want to appear an uninteresting 142 Ident ity and Language Learningperson because of her lack of fluency in English. Thus, while she has over-come the hurdle of being considered an immigrant in the workplace, she feels that her lack of fluency in English makes her an uninteresting foreign person.I listen to more English at my work than I have to talk. Sometimes the ladies ask me something about my country or my family, but I think that I’m not an interesting person because my English is limited and I have to think before talking. I feel confident with them because it is about eight months that we worked together and I see them every day. They are very nice and patient with my English. I understand most that they talk, but I sometimes have to guess something.Felicia does take the opportunity to talk to the toddlers in the childcare centre, although they tend to be very young and remain in the centre for only brief periods of time. However, Felicia is very reluctant to talk to the chil-dren’s mothers: ‘I avoid talking with the children’s mothers because my English is too poor and I don’t feel well talking with strangers. I would like to tell the mothers many things about their babies but I prefer to be silent. I only tell what is necessary.’ Felicia prefers to be silent than to risk the pos-sibility of being positioned as an immigrant in Canada: Strangers would have little knowledge of her Peruvian history and social class. Thus the opportuni-ties open to Felicia to practice English are constrained by the risk of her being marginalized as an immigrant.By way of comparison, when Felicia accepts another part-time job at an after-school childcare programme, she quits this job after only a few days because she feels both incompetent and marginalized at the school. Because she had to deal with older children, she needed fairly advanced English skills and struggled to maintain discipline in the programme. The children, fur-thermore, appeared to have little respect for her Spanish background and marginalized her as different. In addition, she was the only adult in the programme, and had no support from or communication with adults who might be more sympathetic than the children towards her Peruvian identity.I started to work on Wednesday. Wednesday was okay, there were 19 children to look after and I could communicate with them and with the teacher who used to do this work before. Yesterday I went with Maria, she spoke to me in Spanish many times, there were different children than the day before, two of them were very active and the kind of children that don’t like to obey. I had to call them the atten-tion many times and I felt that my English was limited. One of the older children asked me, you have an accent, don’t you? I answered yes, I do. He asked me if my language was French, and I answered not, but it is close to French. When his mother came to pick him up, Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 143I asked him his name, and he answered ‘I don’t know to tell my name in Spanish’, and I answered him, ‘You don’t have to tell me your name in Spanish, you have to tell it in English.’ Yesterday I didn’t feel very well there.CommentIn this chapter I have argued, with reference to the three older women in the study, that their investment in English and their opportunities to prac-tice English must be understood in the context of their changing identities across historical time and social space. While recognizing the multiplicity and complexity of identity, an examination of their identities as mother offers a particularly interesting opportunity for comparative analysis. I have asked the question: ‘To what extent is an immigrant woman’s gendered iden-tity as “mother” implicated in her investment in the target language and her interaction with target language speakers?’ Perhaps the first and most impor-tant point to note is that the children of immigrant women are or will likely become target language speakers. Katarina, who had only one child, was acutely aware of this. Indeed, two concerns weighed heavily on her mind: Maria might grow up speaking a language that Katarina could not under-stand, and Maria might forget the only language that Katarina could under-stand. The solution to her dilemma was twofold: Maria had to become bilingual, and Katarina had to learn English as quickly and efficiently as possible, notwithstanding her ambivalence towards the language. Her invest-ment in English was not, however, a one-to-one gender mapping: The data indicate convincingly that Katarina’s desire to be recognized as a professional was also of great importance to her. Further, Katarina had none of the ambiv-alent feelings towards her native language, Polish, that Mai’s sister had towards Vietnamese, or, for that matter, that Anzaldúa’s mother, quoted at the beginning of this chapter, had towards Chicano Spanish. Why some minority languages have greater value than others is a topic that will receive greater attention in Chapter 6.Although Martina and Felicia were both mothers of three children, all of whom were fluent speakers of their native language as well as English, their positions within their respective families were very different, which in turn influenced their investment in the English language and their relationship with target language speakers. Martina was not only the mother in the family but the primary caregiver, with an unemployed husband who had very limited proficiency in English. While her children initially took respon-sibility for interacting with the larger anglophone community, Martina wanted to learn English as quickly as possible so that she could take over such responsibilities from her children. To be a good mother in this context, then, extended not only to the private sphere of the home, but to all the 144 Ident ity and Language Learningpublic institutions outside of it. For this reason, Martina could not give up and, notwithstanding adverse experiences in the public world, would not be silenced. Unlike Martina, Felicia had a husband who was fully competent, not only in the English language, but in the cultural practices of Canadian society. And, unlike Katarina, she had a secure relationship with her children. Thus, while her identity as mother in the private sphere of her home was secure, the only identity that had any public value for her was that of wealthy Peruvian. When she was able to assert her identity as a wealthy Peruvian to a sympathetic interlocutor, she would feel sufficiently comfortable to speak; conversely, she would rather not speak than be positioned as an immigrant. Given the particular circumstances of her private and public identity, her ambivalence towards English can be better understood. In the next chapter, I move from a predominantly descriptive presentation of the language learn-ing experiences of the five women to a more analytical and interpretative discussion of the data.Note(1) Martina explained that ‘steel days’ were days on which people leave second-hand steel appliances outside for other people to pick up if needed.Mothers, Migrat ion and Language Learning 145146Second Language Acquisition Theory RevisitedNo researcher today would dispute that language learning results from participation in communicative events. Despite any claims to the contrary, however, the nature of this learning remains undefined.Savignon, 1991, p. 271Language is more than a mode of communication or a system composed of rules, vocabulary, and meaning; it is an active medium of social practice through which people construct, define, and struggle over meanings in dialogue with and in relation to others. And because language exists within a larger structural context, this practice is, in part, positioned and shaped by the ongoing relations of power that exist between and among individuals.Walsh, 1991, p. 32At the 1999 TESOL convention in New York, USA, Julian Edge and I (Edge & Norton, 1999) debated the extent to which it is productive to incorporate notions of power into theories of SLA. The point I made at the time is that, if we avoid naming and confronting questions of power in social interaction, we may struggle to understand the language learning experiences of our stu-dents. If we assume, for example, that all relationships between language learners and target language speakers are egalitarian ones, we might expect learners to enjoy the comfort and ease that Katarina experienced in her inter-actions with the elderly people in her Community Service job. However, this leaves unanswered questions about Eva’s relationships to her co-workers at Munchies, Mai’s at the Fabric Factory and Martina’s at Fast Foods. Without incorporating theories of power in SLA (see Chapter 1), the nature of partici-pation in communicative events may not only remain undefined, but unex-plained. Such debates over power are not unique to SLA, however, and extend to the broader area of applied linguistics. As indicated in Chapter 5, Lakoff (1975) and Tannen (1990) have different interpretations of the speech production of women and men because they have divergent views on ques-tions of power. While Lakoff argues that the speech patterns of women and men are best understood in the context of inequitable relations of power, 6Tannen understands such speech patterns as markers of difference rather than inequity. Such debates are not trivial ones. How we name and under-stand difference has a direct bearing on how we address it, at both a theoreti-cal and practical level. If women and men are understood to be different but equal, there is little need for social change; if inequities exist, there is greater demand for social action.Drawing on data presented in previous chapters, I take the position that some of the current models of SLA, in neglecting to address questions of power, do not do justice to the language learning experiences of immigrant language learners. It is important to note, further, that the data I present have striking similarities to the data presented in the larger, ESF project (Bremer et al., 1996). I begin the chapter by revisiting theories of natural language learning, the acculturation model of SLA and the affective filter hypothesis, respectively. In the penultimate section, I argue that a post-structuralist conception of identity and Bourdieu’s (1977) notion of legiti-mate discourse are theoretically useful in helping to explain the findings from my study and are a valuable contribution to SLA theory. In the final section, I extend these ideas to argue for a conception of language learning as a social practice.Natural Language LearningWith reference to the learning of English as a second language, my research suggests that Spolsky’s (1989) description of natural language learn-ing, as outlined in Chapter 1, does not adequately reflect the experiences of the immigrant women in my study. Drawing on the data, I address each of the five characteristics of natural language learning that he outlines, with the caveat that Spolsky is reporting on current theory in the field rather than articulating a personal position.The first claim that Spolsky makes is that, in natural language learning, the target language is used for authentic communication and not for con-trived, classroom purposes. Under such conditions, there is a negotiation of meaning that is a valuable form of practice. What the data from my study indicate, however, is that target language speakers are frequently unwilling to engage in a negotiation of meaning with language learners. It was only on rare occasions that native English speakers would take the time to repair a breakdown in communication. More often than not, the native speakers would indicate through paralanguage their impatience with these foreign women: ‘I could see by their face that they think this’, said Eva. Martina said that the expressions on the faces of the students she worked with at Fast Foods were sometimes worse than their comments.The second claim is that in natural language learning, the learner is sur-rounded by fluent speakers of English. For three of the immigrant women in Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 147the study, Eva, Katarina and Martina, English was hardly ever spoken in their neighborhoods. All three lived in a community where accommodation was particularly inexpensive and tended to attract those people who had limited means of financial support, many of whom were ESL immigrants. English was spoken in Mai and Felicia’s neighborhoods, but Felicia was afraid to speak for fear that she would be marginalized as an immigrant. Mai never once indicated that she spoke English to any of her affluent, predominantly anglophone neighbors. The only dependable exposure that the women had to spoken English was through television and radio, but these did not provide the women with opportunities to practice their speaking. A number of the women resorted to eavesdropping to increase their exposure to spoken English, whether on the bus, in stores or in shopping malls. As Martina indicates, however, when she sometimes tried to engage anglophones in social conversation in these public places, they would ‘run away’. It was only in the workplace that some of the women were surrounded by fluent speak-ers of English. These fluent speakers of English, however, were organized in social networks to which the women struggled, and often failed, to gain access. Even in a supportive environment such as Felicia’s, the tendency was for the learners to listen rather than speak. When the environment became hostile, as it did when workers were laid off at Mai’s work, not only was Mai unable to speak, but the language medium of the workplace changed. Mai was then faced with the difficult decision of abandoning her social network at work or abandoning her attempts to speak English.The third claim is that the outside world is open and stimulating, where there is a multitude of contextual clues for understanding language in use. For the women in the study, the outside world was not open and stimulating but one which, at best, ‘went by without emotion’ (Felicia), at worst was ‘all storm and big windy’ (Mai). All the women were intimi-dated by strangers – by people who did not know them, their personal histories, and the fact that they were not uneducated, illiterate, immi-grants. The kind of contextual clues they would find in the outside world were those that dismissed them from the very open and stimulating envi-ronments they sought: ‘They thought I was a broom or something’, said Martina; ‘They took advantage of me because they knew I wouldn’t say anything’, said Eva. The kinds of social contexts in which the women felt most comfortable to speak were familiar, friendly, intimate environments, where people were patient with their English. It is striking, in retrospect, to note that the place where the women spoke most comfortably and at length was in my car, when I used to drive them home from our diary study meetings. In the car we were all in close physical contact with one another; we were all removed from the stresses of the home, the workplace and the school; and we had all enjoyed an evening of intimate talk, in which experiences of marginalization were explored in the light of social relations of power rather than personal inadequacy. We were all in a mobile, 148 Ident ity and Language Learninginsulated capsule, safe from the assaults of the ‘open and stimulating’ world. And we never stopped talking.The fourth claim that is made is that, in natural language learning, the language used is free and normal, rather than carefully controlled and simpli-fied. While the women were exposed to English spoken at a normal pace, they certainly did not feel free to use English as they would have liked to. Felicia, for example, frequently wished to tell the mothers of the children she tended stories of what had happened during the day, but refrained from doing so for fear of appearing incompetent. Eva wanted to tell her co-worker at Munchies to stop exploiting her, but only felt free, ultimately, to joke lightly when the co-worker was not doing her fair share of the work. Mai wanted to tell her brother that he could not control her life, but it was at times easier to be quiet and say nothing. Because most social interactions that the women encountered were marked by inequalities of gender and ethnicity, the language used was seldom free and normal but a mechanism of social control.The final claim made is that in natural learning situations, where atten-tion is on the meaning of the communication, ‘the [native] speaker makes an effort to see that language is comprehensible’ (Spolsky, 1989, p. 173). Martina’s landlord never made it clear to Martina that she would be liable for a year’s rent if she broke her lease; nor did the appliance dealer make it clear to her that she would have to wait for months to replace the refrigerator that kept warming up. The immigration officials never made it clear to Felicia that Canada was not always a land of milk and honey. The research suggests that the onus is on the learner to understand and be understood, and not on the native speaker to ensure that the learner understands. Whenever a breakdown in communication occurred, it is significant that the learner felt ashamed, while the target language speaker felt impatient or angry. It was for this reason that the women’s desire to make themselves understood was even stronger than their desire to understand. One of Mai’s co-workers from the first job that Mai had in Canada explained to Mai at a later date that she had stopped trying to talk to Mai because it had made her so tired. Martina said that Canadians are fed up with people who don’t speak English. Eva said that her co-worker had indicated that he didn’t like working with people who aren’t Canadian. Felicia said that Canadians looked down on immigrants.In sum, natural language learning does not necessarily offer language learners the opportunity to learn a second language in an open and stimulat-ing environment, in which learners are surrounded by fluent speakers of the target language, who generously ensure that the learner understands the com-munication directed at the learner, and who are prepared to negotiate mean-ing in an egalitarian and supportive atmosphere. The research suggests that natural language learning is frequently marked by inequitable relations of power in which language learners struggle for access to social networks that Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 149will give them the opportunities to practice their English in safe and support-ive environments. The reality for most of the women in the study was that the outside world was frequently hostile and uninviting. Native speakers of English were often impatient with their attempts at communication and more likely to avoid them than negotiate meaning with them. The multitude of contextual clues that they picked up were that native speakers did not like to talk or work with immigrants.Bourdieu’s (1977) notion of the legitimate speaker, introduced in Chapter 1, helps to explain the natural language learning experiences of these immigrant women. He argues that, when a person speaks, the speaker wishes not only to be understood, but to be ‘believed, obeyed, respected, distinguished’ (p. 648). However, Bourdieu takes the position that a speaker’s ability to command the listener is unequally structured for different speakers because of the symbolic power relations between them. His position, he argues, is distinct from that of the linguist (as well, I have argued, from many SLA theorists) who has only an abstract notion of competence:The linguist regards the conditions for the establishment of communica-tion as already secured, whereas, in real situations, that is the essential question. He takes for granted the crucial point, namely that people [who] talk to each other, are ‘on speaking terms,’ that those who speak regard those who listen as worthy to listen and that those who listen regard those who speak as worthy to speak. (p. 648)Drawing on Bourdieu, I take the position that the women’s experiences of natural language learning were generally alienating ones because they could not command the attention of their listeners; nor were they regarded as worthy to speak. It is for this reason, I suggest, that the women were more concerned that they be understood than that they understand: If they could not impose reception, if they had no right to speak, they were ipso facto unworthy people. Because the linguist’s abstract notion of competence does not address real situations (or what SLA theorists call natural situations of social interaction), Bourdieu argues that the expanded definition of compe-tence should include the ‘right to speech’ (1977, p. 648). This is an issue that will be addressed more fully in the final section of this chapter.Alberto and The Acculturation Model of SLAIn 1973 a research project was undertaken at Harvard University by Cazden, Cancino, Rosansky and Schumann (1975) to conduct a 10-month longitudinal study of the untutored acquisition of English by six native speak-ers of Spanish – two children, two adolescents and two adults. The study focused on the subjects’ acquisition of wh-questions, negatives and auxiliaries. 150 Ident ity and Language LearningData collection involved the recording of both spontaneous and experimen-tally elicited speech. Schumann presents the findings on the 33-year-old, working-class Costa Rican subject, Alberto, in whom Schumann took a particular professional interest, to support his pidginization hypothesis (1976b, 1978a) and the acculturation model of SLA (1978b, 1986). There are a number of reasons why I would like to examine the acculturation model of SLA in some depth. The model was developed specifically with a view to explaining the language acquisition of adult immigrants. ‘This model accounts for second-language acquisition under conditions of immigration’, says Schumann (1978b, p. 47). As such, it is particularly germane for the purposes of my study. Further, the model is based on the premise that there is a causal link between acculturation and SLA: ‘SLA is just one aspect of acculturation and the degree to which the learner acculturates to the TL (target language) group will control the degree to which he acquires the second language’ (1978b, p. 34). In addition, Schumann (1978b, p. 48) states that the model ‘argues for acculturation and against instruction’. In other words, if accultura-tion does not take place, instruction in the target language will be of limited benefit to the language learner – a theory which has important implications for the second language education of adult immigrants. Finally, the model has been highly influential in the field of SLA, featuring prominently in the estab-lished literature on SLA theory (see for example H.D. Brown, 1994; Ellis, 1997; Larsen-Freeman & Long, 1991; Spolsky, 1989).In his study, Schumann noted that Alberto showed very little linguistic development during the 10-month research study, far less in fact, than the other five subjects. Alberto was characterized as using a reduced and simpli-fied form of English, what Schumann calls a pidginized English. Schumann argues that three explanations are considered for the lack of development in Alberto’s speech: ability, age and social and psychological distance from speakers of the target language. Schumann dismisses the first two reasons on the grounds of lack of evidence and concludes that it is the ‘social and psychological distance’ between Alberto and the target language community that accounts for Alberto’s pidginized speech. In his later work, Schumann (1978b) refined his earlier theories into the acculturation model of SLA, the central premise of which is as follows:I would like to argue that two groups of variables – social factors and affective factors – cluster into a single variable which is the major causal variable in SLA. I propose that we call this variable acculturation. By acculturation I mean the social and psychological integration of the indi-vidual with the target language group. I also propose that any learner can be placed on a continuum that ranges from social and psychological dis-tance to social and psychological proximity with speakers of the TL, and that the learner will acquire the language only to the extent that he acculturates. (p. 29)Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 151While the details of acculturation model are accessible in the numerous pub-lications listed above, what is of particular relevance to the focus of my study is the process whereby Schumann reached his conclusions and the theoretical adequacy of the model that he developed on the basis of his findings. I return then to the data on which Schumann bases his acculturation model of SLA: the pidginized speech of a 33-year-old working-class Costa Rican named Alberto.In the original 1973 study conducted by Cazden et al. (1975) there were, as indicated above, six subjects: two children, two adolescents and two adults. While the first four subjects were the children of upper middle-class Latin American professional immigrants, Schumann describes Alberto as belonging to ‘a social group designated as lower-class Latin American worker immigrants’ (1976b, p. 400). During the course of the 10-month study, Alberto’s incorrect usage of the English negative, interrogative and auxiliary did not improve, while that of the other subjects did. Schumann argues that since the Latin American worker immigrant group was at a greater social distance from Americans than are professionals, he would expect the work-er’s use of English to be functionally restricted and to pidginize. ‘This is precisely what we found in Alberto’, argues Schumann. In order to get some assessment of Alberto’s psychological distance from Americans, Alberto was given a questionnaire to fill out on his attitude and motivation. Unexpectedly, the questionnaire indicated that Alberto ‘seemed to have a positive attitude and good motivation, and hence little psychological dis-tance’ (Schumann, 1976b, p. 403) from the target language community. It is significant that Schumann dismisses this evidence on the grounds that Alberto may not have been entirely candid in his answers. Because Alberto was not responding as expected, Schumann assumed that Alberto was not telling the truth.While Schumann accused Alberto of saying ‘what he thought the experi-menter wanted to hear’ (1976b, p. 403), Schumann does not consider the possibility that the experimenter would only hear what he wanted to prove – namely that a learner whose language pidginizes must ipso facto be unmo-tivated and have negative attitudes towards the target language community. Schumann does not consider two alternative possibilities to explain his data: First, that a highly motivated Alberto was telling the truth and did indeed have positive attitudes towards Americans; second, that the reason why Alberto’s language pidginized was very simply because the members of the dominant anglophone community had ambivalent attitudes towards Alberto, offering him limited opportunities to practice English, rather than the reverse situation. In essence, if Schumann found that Alberto’s lack of progress in language learning was due to the social and psychological distance between Alberto and anglophones, it may be because the dominant power structures within society had relegated Alberto to a marginalized status and then blamed him for his inability to acculturate.152 Ident ity and Language LearningThe strength of the acculturation model is that it highlights the sociocul-tural context of language learning without neglecting the role of individuals in the language learning process. It recognizes, furthermore, the importance that must be placed on regular contact between language learners and speak-ers of the target language for successful language learning to take place. However, I wish to call into question the theoretical adequacy of the model and argue for a different conception of the relationship between the adult immigrant language learner and the target language community than that presupposed by this model. In order to defend my position, I examine three assumptions of the acculturation model in some depth.Assumption 1: If a second language group is inferior or subordinate to the target language group, it will resist learning the second language.The first point to note here is that the acculturation model does not theo-rize inferiority and superiority with reference to inequitable relations of power, in which second language groups are socially structured as inferior to the dominant group. The data from my study indicate that the participants did not arrive in Canada feeling inferior or what Martina called less worthy than Canadians; they were constructed as such by the signifying practices of the dominant society. The social meaning of immigrant is one that was constructed within and by the everyday experiences of the women in the study in the multiple domains of their lives. For example, as a result of her interaction with immigration officials, Katarina concluded that immigration officials think that immigrants ‘must work for first ten years as dishwasher’. Thus, one of the social meanings of immigrant, for Katarina, is that it con-notes a working-class position. This view is corroborated by other partici-pants, who noted that an immigrant is someone who is considered to work in unskilled jobs, someone who, as Eva put it, has very little education and is too stupid to do skilled work. An immigrant is also a person who, as Felicia said, people look down on. Mai had to struggle against being positioned as an immigrant on the grounds of her language and her race while Martina said that her lack of fluency in English made her feel inferior. For all the women, the social meaning of immigrant was not newcomer with initiative and courage, but uneducated, unskilled minority. The only woman who would speak under such conditions of marginalization was Martina, and she did so only because she could not give up if her family were to thrive in Canada.The second point to note, in relation to Assumption 1, is that, even though the women felt marginalized in Canadian society, they did not resist learning English. On the contrary, they strongly believed that command of the English language would rid them of the immigrant label and help them obtain the opportunities for which they had come to Canada. Indeed, the Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 153data indicate that the people who resist interaction are more likely to be members of the dominant language group rather than immigrant language learners. It is quite possible that Alberto, like the women in the study, may have simultaneously chafed against his inferior status while still seeking opportunities to speak to anglophones. He did, after all, devote 10 months of his time with anglophone researchers practicing the negative construction in English.Assumption 2: If members of the second language learning group give up their lifestyles and values and adopt those of the target language group, they will maximize their contact with the target language group and enhance SLA.Assumption 3: Positive attitudes between the target language group and the second language group will enhance SLA.Assumption 2 given above is described in the acculturation model as the integration strategy of assimilation (Schumann, 1978b). The model states that, while it is not essential for a language learning group to give up its lifestyles and values in order to enhance SLA, the group must minimally adapt to the lifestyle and values of the target language group for acquisition to take place; it can still maintain its own lifestyles and values for intragroup use. Positive attitudes (Assumption 3) between the two groups will facilitate assimilation and thus enhance the SLA of the language learner group. The problem with Assumptions 2 and 3 is that they take for granted that mem-bers of the target language group are happy to accommodate attempts by the second language group to assimilate and that they will reciprocate the posi-tive attitudes of the language learner group. The model does not consider the possibility that inequitable power relations may prevent members of the lan-guage learner group from maximizing their contact with target language speakers, notwithstanding the positive attitudes of the language learner group. More significantly, however, the model does not consider the possibil-ity that SLA may, in contradistinction to the model’s predictions, be impeded if language learners give up their lifestyle and values in favour of those of the target language group. As a particularly striking – and tragic – example of this, I wish to focus on the data obtained on Mai’s language learning experi-ences in her brother’s home.I noted in Chapter 4 that Mai had many opportunities to practice speak-ing English in her place of residence because her nephews were monolingual speakers of English, and could not converse in Vietnamese, their mother tongue. Furthermore, Mai took on the position of a language broker in her brother’s home, interpreting between her nephews and her parents, and occasionally between her nephews and their mother. The nephews were sur-prised that, although Mai had only been in Canada a short time, she was a better speaker of English than their mother, who had lived in Canada for 154 Ident ity and Language Learningover ten years. A central concern here is the fact that Mai’s nephews had undergone a process of what Lambert (1975) calls subtractive bilingualism, in which a second language was learnt at the cost of losing the mother tongue, and that Mai’s sister-in-law was unable to interact successfully with her own children – in either her mother tongue or the target language. What is equally disturbing, given Assumptions 2 and 3, is that Mai’s brother and sister-in-law had actively sought to assimilate into the anglophone Canadian world and had highly positive attitudes towards Canadians. Something had gone terribly wrong.I suggest that the reason why Mai’s extended family was populated by monolingual speakers, when a process of rich bilingualism might have taken place, is partly because Mai’s extended family was caught up in a discourse of racism in Canadian society and perhaps in other countries in which her brother had lived, travelled and worked. As I have indicated in Chapter 4, Mai learnt very soon after arriving in Canada that her brother thought Canadians were superior (‘high’), while Vietnamese and Chinese people were inferior (‘low’). Mai was shocked at how much her brother had changed: He had little regard for his own history and way of life; he had little respect for his own parents, he thought Vietnamese and Chinese people were bad people, and he (and his wife) had not actively encouraged their children to maintain their mother tongue. Given Mai’s brother’s experience of overt or covert racism, it is not difficult to see how his sons could have grown to despise their appearance, reject their histories and lose their command of Vietnamese, their mother tongue. Mai, who believed that a person cannot just discard everything that one values (and who, significantly, had made great progress in learning the target language) was aware of this tragedy, and vowed the following: ‘I think I won’t let it happen to my children if I have in my future.’The acculturation model does not acknowledge that situations of addi-tive1 and subtractive bilingualism must be understood with reference to larger social structures in which (in the Canadian context) language learners of European descent do not experience the racism that is experienced by people of Vietnamese descent. Consider Katarina, for example, who com-pared her experiences of living in Austria, where she said Polish people are considered ‘second category’ people with her experiences in Canada, where she said Canadians accept Polish people. In contrast to Mai’s sister-in-law who did not encourage her sons to learn Vietnamese, Katarina actively sought to ensure that her daughter Maria maintained her mother tongue while learn-ing English. Furthermore, the acculturation model does not address the point that immigrant language learners are generally more invested in relationships with target language speakers than the reverse situation. The immigrants are the ones who need to make contact with members of the target language community if their language learning is to improve, and they are far more vulnerable to the attitudes of the dominant group than the dominant group Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 155is vulnerable to them. Despite the marginalization experienced by the women in my study, the only one who expressed negative attitudes towards Canadians as a group was Felicia, who indicated that she thought Canadians are not friendly people. Even this attitude, however, did not deter Felicia from seek-ing opportunities to practice English with a fellow learner in the non-threat-ening environment of her home. The remaining four women frequently indicated their desire to have more contact with Canadians.In sum, the acculturation model draws sharp distinctions between the social (group differences between the language learner group and the target language group) and the individual, who may be motivated or unmotivated. The model places the onus on the adult immigrant to make the appropriate adjustments to the target language community in order to increase contact with target language speakers, thereby enhancing the SLA process. To the extent that progress is not made in language learning, the model holds the language learner responsible for resisting acculturation. Differences between language learners and target language speakers are not theorized in terms of unequal relations of power, which compromise efforts by language learners to interact with target language speakers and promote SLA. Indeed, it is a tragic irony that in the only case where a family rejected its own values and lifestyle in favour of the perceived values of anglophone Canadians, the social fabric of the family was destroyed, together with any hope of bilingual lan-guage development.The Affective FilterAs indicated in Chapter 1, most current models of SLA note the impor-tance of affective factors in the second language learning process. Krashen (1981, 1982) has in fact hypothesized that comprehensible input in the pres-ence of a low affective filter is the major causal variable in SLA. In Krashen’s view, this affective filter comprises the learner’s motivation, self-confidence and anxiety state and these are variables that pertain to the individual rather than the social context. I have indicated, however, that many second lan-guage theorists are not in complete agreement with Krashen’s conception of the affective filter or his understanding of how affective variables interact with the larger social context. By reexamining the notions of motivation, self-confidence and anxiety with reference to my data, I will argue that a language learner’s affective filter cannot be understood apart from his or her relationship to larger, and frequently inequitable social structures.MotivationAll the participants in the study were highly motivated to learn English. They all took extra courses to learn English, they all participated in the diary 156 Ident ity and Language Learningstudy, they all wished to have more social contact with anglophone Canadians and all of them, except Martina, indicated that they felt comfortable speak-ing to friends. It is significant, however, that all the women felt uncomfort-able talking to people in whom they had a particular symbolic or material investment. Eva, who came to Canada for economic advantage, and was eager to work with anglophones, practice her English and get better jobs, was silenced when the very customers she depended on made comments about her accent. Mai, who came to Canada for her life in the future and depended on the wishes of management for her job security and financial indepen-dence, was most uncomfortable speaking to her boss. Katarina, who came to Canada to escape a communist and atheistic system, and had a great invest-ment in her status as a professional, felt most uncomfortable talking to her teacher, the doctor and other anglophone professionals. Martina, who had given up a surveyor’s job to come to Canada for the children, was frustrated and uncomfortable when she could not defend her children’s rights in the public world. Felicia, who had come to Canada to escape terrorism, and had great investment in her Peruvian identity, felt most uncomfortable speaking English in front of Peruvians who speak English fluently.Despite being highly motivated, there were particular conditions under which the women were most uncomfortable and unlikely to speak. As argued in Chapter 1, the concept of motivation as currently taken up in the SLA literature conceives of the language learner as having a unified, coherent identity which organizes the type and intensity of a language learner’s moti-vation. My data indicate that motivation is a much more complex matter than hitherto conceived. A learner’s motivation to speak is mediated by other investments that may conflict with the desire to speak – investments that are intimately connected to the ongoing production of the learners’ identities and their desires for the future. In order to capture the complex interaction of different forces on the women’s desire to speak and practice English, I have talked about the women’s investment in English, rather than their motiva-tion to speak. By exploring the women’s investment in English, it is possible to understand how and to what extent they created and responded to oppor-tunities to practice English. I will consider each of the women in turn.For Eva, English represented a means towards economic independence in the public world, and access to higher education. Her investment in English must be understood with reference to her gendered identity as a young, single woman, her reasons for immigrating to Canada – for economic advantage, and her plans for the future – to study at college. Unfettered by heavy domestic duties and childcare responsibilities, she was able to seek and obtain full-time employment in workplaces that would give her increased exposure to English and opportunities to practice English. As she gradually assumed the identity of a valued co-worker and multicultural citizen, she began to speak more.English for Mai represented a means towards gender emancipation in the home as well as economic independence in the private and public world. Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 157Mai’s gendered identity as a single woman was one that was constantly undermined, initially in her home, and ultimately in the workplace. It was command of English that gave her an identity as a language broker in her home and the prospect of an attractive career in the public world. Her invest-ment in English must be understood with reference to the constraints of her domestic life, her reasons for coming to Canada ‘for my life in the future’, and her plans for the future – ‘to take some higher course at college’. She was extremely diligent in her attempts to practice English, and drew constantly on resources in the home, workplace and community to do so. Her new posi-tion as a wife in a patriarchal marriage, however, may ultimately undermine her opportunities to speak and practice English.For Katarina, English was not an unqualified boon as it represented a threat to her gendered identity as a mother. It also represented a challenge to her authority in the private world because her husband, who was more com-petent in English than she was, took charge of the private/public communi-cative tasks when they first moved to Canada. However, English was also her means towards entry into a professional world where life would be normal again, as it had been in Poland. A normal life for Katarina was one in which fellow professionals would validate her symbolic resources, and one in which she could have regular social contact with Canadians who shared her values and educated status. As will be examined more fully in Chapter 7, Katarina withdrew from social interaction and resisted opportunities to learn English when her symbolic resources were not validated.For Martina, English represented a means towards a better future for her children, which was her reason for coming to Canada. Her desire to learn English to get a better job was secondary to the needs of her family, particu-larly because her husband was unable to help perform the private/public communicative tasks necessary to preserve the continuity of family life. Although she was a highly educated woman, Martina did not demand respect for her educated status in the same way that Katarina had, and she did not react as strongly as Katarina had towards being positioned as an immigrant. Because her investment in English had less to do with her own life chances than with the life chances of her children, marginalization did not silence Martina: In the interests of her children, she knew she could not give up. She took every opportunity to practice English, even if it meant phoning strangers on vague pretexts, and she did not withdraw when people treated her with disrespect.For Felicia, English represented the means towards her acceptance as an interesting person who could actively participate in social interactions with Canadians rather than passively observing them. Because she had three chil-dren, two of whom were adolescents, she was not concerned, as Katarina was, that English would threaten her gendered identity as a mother. However, because all her family were more competent in English than she was, she was not required to deal with the public anglophone world in the same way that 158 Ident ity and Language LearningMartina had. Felicia knew that she had to ‘practice, practice, practice’ in order to improve her English, but, unlike Martina, did not make use of every opportunity to speak. Her fear of being marginalized as an immigrant was greater than her desire to practice English in the public world. For this reason, she retreated into the safety of her home to practice English with another language learner who validated her Peruvian identity. As will be discussed more fully in Chapter 7, Felicia totally withdrew from social interaction when her Peruvian identity was negated.Anxiety and self-confi denceThe confusion in the literature about the role of motivation in SLA is paralleled by debate over the role of anxiety and self-confidence in SLA.2 Spolsky (1989, p. 115), for example, has argued that ‘there is a specific kind of anxiety that in the case of many learners interferes with second language learning’. He argues that this anxiety is most often focused on lis-tening and speaking skills. Bailey (1983), on the other hand, distinguishes between facilitating and debilitating anxiety, suggesting that anxiety is not a permanent predisposition of a learner, but is context-dependent. In Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis, anxiety and poor self-confidence (along with low motivation) are considered individual characteristics of a poor lan-guage learner. My data suggest that there is a variety of ways in which anxi-ety and self-confidence influence the extent to which learners create and respond to opportunities to practice the target language. The data indicate that in the natural language learning situation, a learner’s anxiety is, as Spolsky argues, associated with the learner’s oral skills rather than literacy skills. Felicia made the point that it is ‘easier for me yet, understand when I read, than when I listen (or hear)’. Martina, for example, says ‘if I wrote I can correct by myself and I can think about it. The problem with speaking, I don’t have time to think about it. But if I write something, it’s not big prob-lem’. Eva points to a related problem when she says that, unlike the Canadians at her work who are fluent in English, she cannot take her customers’ orders and speak to them at the same time: ‘They don’t understand sometimes what it is and then I have to explain everything. And it’s hard for me, because for another person who can speak English fluently, it’s not as hard, and I cannot do this all the time – write and speak’. The problem, Eva says, is one of time: ‘I wouldn’t speak to the customers because I wouldn’t feel confident to speak to the customers. Because I do not have enough time to speak to them.’The effect of what Norton Peirce, Swain and Hart (1993) refer to as the locus of control in a communicative event helps to explain the women’s lack of confidence in their oral skills. On the basis of their findings on self-assess-ment among French immersion students, Norton Peirce et al. argue that, if learners control the rate of flow of information in a communicative event, Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 159the locus of control will be in their favour and they will be relatively more confident about their language skills than in communicative events in which the locus of control is not in their favour. The important issue here is whether or not a particular communicative event is time-dependent. In activities that take place in real time, that is when the learner has little time to process information, the learner will have limited time to activate the schemata nec-essary to help decode the utterance. If the utterance does not take place in real time, the learner will take as much time as is necessary to activate such schemata. Since oral activities take place in real time, learners have little control over the rate of flow of information in these communicative events, which in turn increases their levels of anxiety.While the locus of control is a useful construct to explain the anxiety that learners experience when called upon to exercise their oral skills in social interaction, it does not address the extent to which feelings of anxi-ety and lack of confidence are socially constructed in and by the lived expe-riences of learners. Like the women in Rockhill’s study, instead of feeling a sense of accomplishment at the great progress they had all made in learning English, the participants in my study tended to feel ashamed, inferior and uninteresting because of their second language abilities. Such feelings of inadequacy and poor self-confidence must be linked to the power relations that the women had to negotiate in their social interactions in the wider community and their marginalized positions as immigrants. In this regard, Eva’s response to the question, ‘When do you feel most comfortable speak-ing English?’ is significant: ‘It much depends on the speaker I talk to. If one doesn’t constantly show his or her superiority my English is more fluent and relaxed. I become tense and tend to forget even simple grammar rules if one does make comments about my accent.’ Such data indicate very clearly that anxiety is not an inherent trait of a language learner, but one that is socially constructed within and by the lived experiences of language learners.The data indicate further that anxiety is not only constructed within social interaction but also with reference to the learner’s preoccupation with stressful day-to-day living conditions. Mai, for example, made the following comment: ‘I feel comfortable using English most of the time except when I have some problems because by that time the problems always in my mind it makes me feel uncomfortable to using English.’ Of all the women in the study, Mai had arguably the most stressful life in Canada, given that both her home and ultimately her work environments offered her little comfort or refuge from the ‘stormy and windy’ immigrant experience. With problems ‘always on my mind’ Mai felt at times uncomfortable using English, irrespec-tive of the particular social interaction she was engaged in. In contrast, Mai said in an interview that if she feels ‘comfortable or happy, so I can think very easy’. Felicia made a similar point when she wrote that learning English is hard ‘because I live here with many tensions’.160 Ident ity and Language LearningIn the Levi Strauss study, Norton Peirce, Harper and Burnaby (1993) found that some women dropped out of the EWP program because they felt nervous and anxious during the ESL class. Such anxiety was partly socially constructed by the conditions of their work. Because job security was deter-mined by the worker’s ability to achieve what is called their 100 per cent – the minimum productivity level required to maintain their positions at the company – some workers were distracted during the ESL class: They were thinking of work that needed to be done and sewing mistakes that needed to be corrected. As one worker said (Norton Peirce, Harper & Burnaby, 1993, p. 19), ‘The thing is, sometimes I make a lot of mistakes at my work, and I’m think about it. I want the class finish fast so I can go back to work to look at the work.’ Their anxiety could not be considered an invariant personality trait but a condition constructed by poor economic conditions and limited life chances.Reconceptualizing IdentityIn suggesting that the relationship between the individual and the social in the context of second language learning should be reconceptualized, I am drawing particularly on feminist poststructuralism as represented in the work of Weedon (1997). Feminist poststructuralism, like much postmodern educational theory (Cherryholmes, 1988; Giroux, 1988; Simon, 1992), explores how prevailing power relations between individuals, groups and communities impact on the life chances of individuals at a given time and place. The work of feminist poststructuralists, however, is distin-guished from that of other postmodern theorists in the centrality it accords to women’s experience, and the rigorous and comprehensive way it links individual experience and social power in a theory of subjectivity. Subjectivity is defined as ‘the conscious and unconscious thoughts and emo-tions of the individual, her sense of herself and her ways of understanding her relation to the world’ (Weedon, 1997, p. 32). Thus, while feminist post-structuralism is not an orthodoxy, but ‘a field of critical practices that cannot be totalized’ (Butler & Scott, 1992, xiii), it seeks to harness social theory and make it accountable to women’s interests. Having noted the limitations of theories of natural language learning, the acculturation model and the affective filter hypothesis for explaining my data, I have found feminist poststructuralism compelling in its explanatory potential. The theory of subjectivity, in particular, has helped me to formulate a concept of identity that is useful in understanding the women’s stories, a concept which promises to be theoretically productive in SLA theory. In this regard, three defining characteristics of subjectivity are central: the multiple, non-unitary nature of the subject, subjectivity as a site of struggle and subjectiv-ity as changing over time.Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 161Identity and the nonunitary subjectWeedon (1997) argues that the terms subject and subjectivity signify a different conception of the individual than that associated with humanist conceptions of the individual dominant in Western philosophy. While humanist conceptions of the individual – and many definitions of the indi-vidual in SLA research – presuppose that every person has an essential, unique, fixed and coherent core (introvert/extrovert; motivated/unmoti-vated), poststructuralism depicts the individual – the subject – as diverse, contradictory, dynamic and changing over historical time and social space. Subjectivity is conceived of as multiple rather than unitary, decentered rather than centered. The concept of identity as non-unitary and contradictory helps to explain the following data. Eva wanted to be regarded as an equal in the workplace, but she wanted her co-workers to recognize and respect her difference. As she said, ‘When I started to work there, they couldn’t under-stand that it might be difficult for me to understand everything and know about everything what it’s normal for them.’ Mai wanted to resist the patri-archal forces in her family and lead a life independent of her brother, but she did not want to be marginalized as someone who had no man; she wanted to be accepted by the Italian women at work, but she did not want to learn Italian at the expense of learning English. Katarina wanted her daughter to learn English, but she didn’t want her daughter’s knowledge of English to undermine their relationship; she wanted to take English courses, but she also wanted to take computer courses that would give her the opportunity to think. Martina was uncomfortable speaking English but, in the interests of her children, refused to be silent; she felt stupid because of her English skills, but graduated at the top of her tax preparation course. Felicia wanted to ‘practice, practice, practice’ speaking English, but she didn’t want to speak in public; she wanted her husband to find a job, but she didn’t want him to deliver pizza.The position that identity is nonunitary and contradictory has important implications for understanding how the women responded to and created opportunities to speak English. To illustrate this point, consider some of the multiple sites of Martina’s identity formation: She was an immigrant, a mother, a language learner, a worker, a wife. As a socially constructed immi-grant woman, Martina never felt comfortable speaking. As she said, ‘I feel uncomfortable using English in the group of people whose English language is their mother tongue because they speak fluently without any problems and I feel inferior.’ Significantly, however, despite feelings of inferiority and shame, Martina refused to be silenced. I suggest that the reasons why Martina refused to be silenced were because her identity as a mother and primary caregiver in the home led her to violate the appropriate rules of use governing interactions between legitimate speakers of English (anglophone Canadians) and imposters (Bourdieu, 1977). The multiple sites of identity 162 Ident ity and Language Learningformation explain the surprises in Martina’s data. Two examples come to mind, which are described below.Martina surprised her children (and no doubt her landlord and herself) by entering into a long conversation with her landlord on the phone in which she insisted that her family had not broken their lease agreement. As she wrote:The first time I was very nervous and afraid to talk on the phone. When the phone rang, everybody in my family was busy, and my daughter had to answer it. After ESL course when we moved and our landlords tried to persuade me that we have to pay for whole year, I got upset and I talked with him on the phone over one hour and I didn’t think about the tenses rules. I had known that I couldn’t give up. My children were very sur-prised when they heard me.Further, Martina surprised customers at Fast Foods (who looked at her strangely) and co-workers (who were surprised, but said nothing) by taking the initiative to serve the customers while the other workers were playing a video game in the manager’s office.When I tried first time to talk to two customers alone, they looked at me strangely, but I didn’t give up. I gave them everything they wanted and then I went looking for the girls and I told them as usually only ‘cash’. They were surprised but they didn’t say anything.I suggest that Martina’s perseverance (‘I couldn’t give up’, ‘I didn’t give up’) and her courage to challenge linguistic rules of use that limited possibilities for herself and her family intersect with her identity as a mother: As a pri-mary caregiver, she could not rely on her husband to deal with the public world and defend the family’s rights against unscrupulous social practices. Martina had to do this herself, regardless of her command of the English tense system, regardless of the strange looks she received from her interlocutors, regardless of her feelings of inferiority. As well, Martina drew on her sym-bolic resources as a mother to reframe the power relations between herself and her co-workers. Thus, instead of conceding to their power as legitimate speakers of English who had the power to demand obedience of imposters of the language, she reframed their relationship as a domestic one in which, as children, they had no authority over her, as a parent. I repeat the relevant extract from Martina, quoted in Chapter 5:In restaurant was working a lot of children but the children always thought that I am – I don’t know – maybe some broom or something. They always said ‘Go and clean the living room’, and I was washing the dishes and they didn’t do nothing. They talked to each other and they Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 163thought that I had to do everything. And I said ‘No’. The girl is only 12 years old. She is younger than my son. I said ‘No, you are doing nothing. You can go and clean the tables or something.’Identity as a site of struggleIn feminist poststructuralist theory, subjectivity is theorized as produced by and producing the meaning-making practices of the home, the workplace, the school, the community. Subjectivity is produced in a variety of social sites, all of which are structured by relations of power in which the person takes up different subject positions as teacher, child, feminist, manager, critic. The subject, in turn, is not conceived of as passive; he or she is con-ceived of as both subject of and subject to relations of power within a par-ticular site, community and society: the subject has human agency. Thus the subject positions that a person takes up within a particular discourse are open to contestation: While a person may be positioned in a particular way within a given discourse, the person might resist the subject position, or even set up a counter-discourse which positions the person in a powerful rather than marginalized subject position. The concept of identity as a site of strug-gle is a logical extension of the position that identity is multiple and contra-dictory. If identity were unitary, fixed and immutable, it could not be subject to change over time and space, nor subject to contestation.The conception that identity is a site of struggle helps to explain how the participants in the study created and responded to opportunities to speak English. As described above, witness how Martina set up a counter-discourse in her workplace by resisting the subject position immigrant woman in favour of the subject position mother. This not only gave her the right to speak, but, in effect, silenced the co-workers who had been exploiting her. Eva was positioned as ignorant by her co-workers, so she surprised them by teaching them to use some of her languages. By subverting their respective knowledge/power subject positions, she slowly gained access to the social network in the workplace, which in turn gave her increased opportunities to speak English. Mai was positioned as a helpless girl by her brother, so she became a language broker in the home: She did not overtly challenge her brother’s authority, but was able to set up a counter-discourse to the patriarchal relationship between them. Chapter 7 will examine in greater detail Katarina and Felicia’s struggle over identity in the formal context of the school.Identity as changing over timeIn taking the position that subjectivity is multiple, contradictory and a site of struggle, feminist poststructuralism highlights the changing quality of a person’s identity. As Weedon (1997) argues, ‘the political significance of 164 Ident ity and Language Learningdecentring the subject and abandoning the belief in essential subjectivity is that it opens up subjectivity to change’ (p. 32). It is partly for this reason that I have critiqued the notions of a language learner’s attitudes and motivation in SLA theory. Not only are such characteristics socially constructed, but they change over historical time and social space. This is a crucial point for second language educators in that it opens up possibilities for educational intervention, an issue that will be taken up more comprehensively in the next chapter. The conception of identity as subject to change has important implications for the way the women in the study responded to and created opportunities to practice English. The data that I will use to illustrate this point is taken from Eva’s experiences in the workplace. The central point I wish to make here is that it was only over time that Eva’s conception of herself as an immigrant with no right to speak changed to a conception of herself as a multicultural citizen with the power to impose reception (Bourdieu, 1977).When Eva first started working at Munchies, she did not think it was appropriate for her to approach her co-workers, and attempt to engage them in conversation.When I see that I have to do everything and nobody cares about me because – then how can I talk to them? I hear they doesn’t care about me and I don’t feel to go and smile and talk to them.Note that Eva does not complete a crucial part of her sentence. ‘Nobody cares about me because –’ Because why? I suggest that nobody acknowledged Eva because she had the subject position of immigrant in the workplace: She was someone who was not fluent in English; she was not Canadian; she was stupid; she had the worst type of work in the store. To speak under such conditions would have constituted what Bourdieu calls ‘heretical usage’ (1977, p. 672). Eva accepted the subject position, immigrant; she accepted that she was not a legitimate speaker of English and that she could not com-mand reception of her interlocutors. As she herself said, when she first arrived in Canada, she assumed that, if people treated her with disrespect, it was because of her own limitations. She conceded to the appropriate rules of use in her workplace, rules that Eva herself accepted as normal: ‘I think because when I didn’t talk to them, and they didn’t ask me, maybe they think I’m just like – because I had to do the worst type of work there. It’s normal.’As Eva’s sense of who she was, and how she related to the social world began to change, she started to challenge her subject position in the work-place as an illegitimate speaker. It is significant that her co-workers were surprised by her actions, supporting the view that the linguistic rules of use that Eva initially observed in the workplace were indeed an integral part of the power relations at her workplace. As Eva continued to develop what Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 165I have called an identity as a multicultural citizen, she developed with it a sense of her right to speak. If people treated her with disrespect, it was their problem and not her problem. Thus when the male customer asked her if she puts on this accent so that she could get more tips, Eva had been angry rather than ashamed; she had spoken out, rather than been silenced. When she said to him, ‘I wish I did not have this accent because then I would not have to listen to such comments’, she was claiming the right to speak as a multicul-tural citizen of Canada. Nevertheless, even though Eva, at one diary study meeting, had expressed the view that she no longer felt like an immigrant in Canada, she said, less than a year later, that she still felt like an immigrant because she was positioned as one: ‘Because of my distinguishable pronuncia-tion I am viewed as an immigrant by others and therefore I still feel like one.’ Thus, although Eva’s identity had changed over time, it remained a site of struggle.Language Learning as a Social PracticeIn this section I will take the position that Bourdieu’s notion of legiti-mate discourse and poststructuralist theories of identity, as articulated above, are highly productive for conceptualizing language learning as a complex social practice, rather than an abstract, internalized skill. By social practice I refer in particular to its formulation by Lave and Wenger (1991, pp. 49–50):In contrast with learning as internalization, learning as increasing par-ticipation in communities of practice concerns the whole person acting in the world. Conceiving of learning in terms of participation focuses attention on ways in which it is an evolving, continuously renewed set of relations . . . Insistence on the historical nature of motivation, desire and the very relations by which social and culturally mediated experience is available to persons-in-practice is one key to the goals to be met in developing a theory of practice.In seeking to ground these theories, I will focus in some detail on an extract from Eva’s diary:Everybody working with me is Canadian. When I started to work there, they couldn’t understand that it might be difficult for me to understand everthing and know about everthing what it’s normal for them. To explain it more clearly I can write an example, which happened few days ago.The girl which is working with me pointed at the man and said:‘Do you see him?’ I said‘Yes, Why?’166 Ident ity and Language Learning‘Don’t you know him?’‘No. I don’t know him.’‘How come you don’t know him. Don’t you watch tv. That’s Bart Simpson.’It made me feel so bad and I didn’t answer her nothing. Until now I don’t know why this person was important.The extract illustrates that a breakdown in communication has occurred in Eva’s workplace.3 Eva’s co-worker, Gail, has initiated a conversation with Eva, the topic of which is Bart Simpson, an icon of popular culture in North America. When Eva admits that she has no knowledge of this television character, Gail’s response is accusing: ‘How come you don’t know him.’ Eva is silenced by Gail’s response. Although Eva is eager to interact with anglo-phones, practice her English and enhance her language learning, she resists the opportunity to speak. In a follow-up interview, when I asked Eva why she had not responded to Gail, she explained that she had felt humiliated at the time. As she said, ‘“You don’t watch tv?” And I felt “What are you doing?” I was thinking like “This strange woman”.’ These data provide a powerful illustration of the relationship between language, identity and lan-guage learning. Language is not just a neutral form of communication, but a practice that is socially constructed in the hegemonic events, activities and processes that constitute daily life – the practices that are considered normal by the dominant society. When Eva admits her ignorance of Bart Simpson, she is positioned as someone who is strange, someone who does not have the cultural knowledge that is commonsense in the workplace. Gail’s subject position is that of knower, and it is that knowledge that gives her power. Significantly, because Eva does not have access to that knowledge, she is silenced.Bourdieu’s (1977) notion of legitimate discourse, as described in Chapter 4, helps to explain why this breakdown in communication occurred. Because Eva did not have the knowledge that Gail assumed she should have, Eva was positioned as an illegitimate receiver of Gail’s utterance, an impos-ter. Significantly, as soon as Gail recognized that Eva was an imposter, she brought closure to the conversation. Note that Gail’s question to Eva was rhetorical – she did not expect, or possibly even desire a response from Eva. ‘How come you don’t know him. Don’t you watch tv. That’s Bart Simpson.’ I suggest that what made Eva feel bad was being exposed as an imposter, a person strange to legitimate discourse. Because Eva accepted the subject posi-tion of imposter, she could not claim the right to speak. Thus, while Eva had been offered the opportunity to engage in social interaction, to practice her English, her subject position within the larger discourse of which she and Gail were a part undermined this opportunity: ‘It made me feel so bad and I didn’t answer her nothing.’ Such discourse must be understood not only in relation to the words that were said, but in relationship to larger, inequitable Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 167structures within the workplace, and the larger society, in which immigrant language learners are often considered illegitimate speakers of English. Note how Eva was sent off to do the menial jobs in the restaurant so that the other workers could continue their conversations without her, further denying her the opportunity to engage in social interaction in English. As Eva wrote, ‘They take advantage of me, because they know that I wouldn’t say any-thing. I tried talk to them few times, but for them it’s better to send me somewhere, to do something.’ Bourdieu (1977, p. 648) makes the point that the ‘most radical, surest, and best hidden censorships are those which exclude certain individuals from communication’.Given this larger social context, it comes as little surprise that Eva ‘didn’t answer her nothing’ when Gail positioned Eva as ignorant in the Bart Simpson exchange. Because of the construction of Eva’s identity as immi-grant, the social meaning of Gail’s words to her were understood by Eva in this context. Had Eva been, for example, an anglophone Canadian who endorsed public rather than commercial television, or perhaps no television at all, she could have set up a counter-discourse to Gail’s utterance, resisting being positioned as a potentially legitimate receiver of Gail’s utterance. However, because of the unequal relations of power between Gail and Eva, it was Gail who could determine the grounds on which legitimate discourse was to be determined. Like her fictional compatriot, Saliha, in the neighbor-ing province of Quebec, it would be a long time before her interlocutor would let her answer in longer sentences.CommentIn this chapter I have noted the tendency in the field of SLA to avoid ques-tions of power, arguing that the refusal to name and address power relations limits our ability to do justice to the complex experiences of language learners across historical time and social space. The data suggest, in particular, that current conceptions of natural language learning, acculturation and the affec-tive filter should be called into question. Drawing on feminist poststructural-ist theories of subjectivity, as well Bourdieu’s notion of legitimate discourse, I have argued that the learning of a second language is not simply a skill that is acquired with hard work and dedication, but a complex social practice that engages the identities of language learners in ways that have received little attention in the field of SLA. Poststructuralist theories of identity and Bourdieu’s (1977) conception of the right to speech are important contribu-tions to SLA theory, as is Lave and Wenger’s (1991) insistence on the need to conceptualize learning as situated within particular communities of practice in which learners, to a greater or lesser extent, participate. In Chapter 7, I examine the implications of my data for classroom practice, elaborating on what the right to speak might mean for language learning and teaching.168 Ident ity and Language LearningNotes(1) A process whereby a person learns a second language without losing the mother tongue (Lambert, 1975).(2) Like Gardner and MacIntyre (1993), I address these issues simultaneously since they have an inverse relationship to each other.(3) Eva explained later that there was a customer with a Bart Simpson T-shirt on.Second Language Acquisit ion Theory Rev isited 169170Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and CommunitiesIn spite of trendy jargon in textbooks and teacher’s manuals, very little is actually communicated in the L2 classroom. The way it is structured does not seem to stimulate the wish of learners to say something, nor does it tap what they might have to say.Legutke and Thomas, 1991, pp. 8, 9After ESL course when we moved and our landlords tried to persuade me that we have to pay for whole year, I got upset and I talked with him on the phone over one hour and I didn’t think about the tenses rules. I had known that I couldn’t give up.Martina, a language learner‘Culture gap. Chinese teachers don’t think the way most Westerners think’, said a Chinese teacher in explaining why communicative language teaching methods don’t work in China (Burnaby & Sun, 1989, p. 229). In their research in China in the late 1980s, Burnaby and Sun found that traditional teacher–student relationships in China presuppose certain behaviors and teaching methods and that, if teachers used communicative language teaching meth-ods, they might expect students to complain. Resistance from students is not unique to the Chinese context, and this chapter will explore acts of resis-tance in two language classrooms in Canada. I begin the chapter by examin-ing the expectations that Eva, Mai, Katarina, Martina and Felicia had of formal language classes. Then, drawing on the stories of classroom resistance by Katarina and Felicia, I argue that language teachers need to develop an understanding of their students’ investments in the target language and their changing identities. With reference to a story by Mai, however, I note that incorporating student experience into classroom pedagogy is not unproblem-atic, given the dangers of essentializing student identity. After examining the diary study as a pedagogical practice, I conclude that classroom-based social 7research might help to integrate formal and natural sites of language learn-ing. This approach encourages students to adopt the identity of ethnographer rather than language learner in relation to the target language community. By reframing the relationship between language learners and target language speakers, I argue, learners can claim the right to speak outside the classroom. Furthermore, in response to Legutke and Thomas (1991, p. 8), it is hoped that classroom-based social research may ‘stimulate the wish of learners to say something’ in the classroom. This approach is inspired by Martina, quoted above, who is a language learner of great courage and insight.Formal Language Learning and Adult ImmigrantsIn Chapter 6, I have drawn on my data and poststructuralist theory to argue that identity is a site of struggle and change. Immigrants who attend a language class bring not only their local experiences into the classroom, but also their memories of experiences in their native country and their own visions of the future they desire in their new country. Furthermore, they bring their own desires of what a language course should provide to help them settle into a new country and their own expectations of how formal language training can enhance the process of second language learning. To investigate the expectations that the participants had of formal ESL courses, and how these expectations intersected with their experiences of language learning outside the classroom, I closely examined the women’s responses to the question, ‘What has helped you the most to learn English?’ This question was asked in the first questionnaire in December 1990 as well as the second questionnaire a year later. I also used data collected in the first questionnaire which sought to determine what kinds of ESL courses the students consid-ered best for adult immigrants and how courses could be modified to meet their needs.In answer to the question, ‘What has helped you the most to learn English?’, there are quite striking differences between the women’s responses in December 1990 and their responses in December 1991. In December 1990, three of the five women (Eva, Katarina & Martina) stressed the fact that it was the six-month ESL course that had helped them most in learning English. Furthermore, in the first questionnaire, all the women except Felicia indi-cated the importance of instruction in English grammar, pronunciation and vocabulary.1 Katarina summed up the impressions of the group when she wrote in December 1990:If sombody wants to live for good in Canada, should be spoken the English language. In [a preferred course] people will spend most of the time learning English grammar, pronunciation and vocabulary because it is base English.Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 171By December 1991, however, only one woman, Martina, indicated that teachers were the most important influence on her language learning prog-ress. Four of the five women stressed the importance of speaking regularly to anglophones, echoing Felicia’s comment on the need for ‘practice, practice, practice’. The comment made by Eva is representative of the perceptions of the group as a whole: ‘The English as a Second Language course helped me to learn the basics of English. Later, practicing English in everyday conversa-tions helped me to be more fluent.’ All of the women indicated that they would like to meet more Canadians socially and to have more opportunity to practice speaking English outside the classroom.The data that I have examined on natural language learning indicate, however, that, while the women can have exposure to English through television, radio and newspapers, the opportunity to practice speaking English outside the classroom is dependent largely on their access to anglo-phone social networks. Access to such networks was difficult to achieve for these immigrant women. In Eva’s case, she had to struggle to gain entry into the social networks in the workplace. Even then, her access to these networks might have had less to do with her hard work than the social outings that the management organized on a regular basis. While Mai had no difficulty gaining access to the social network in her workplace (perhaps because all her co-workers were immigrants), this solidarity was soon lost when workers started to lose their jobs. Katarina had the unique opportu-nity to speak to the elderly and patient Canadians that she tended on a regular basis; she indicates, however, that she has little social contact with other Canadians. Despite eight months of conscientious work at Fast Foods, Martina never managed to penetrate the social network at work; however, she took the opportunity to practice English whenever she could create an opportunity to do so. Felicia had the opportunity to practice speaking English at work, although she said she was more likely to listen than to speak.What are the implications of these findings on natural language learning for second language pedagogy? In essence, all the women wanted more prac-tice using English in the classroom so that they could transfer their skills to learning contexts outside the classroom. While all the women indicated that they had learnt a lot in the six-month ESL course subsidized by Employment and Immigration Canada, a number indicated that the course did not give them sufficient opportunity to practice what they had learnt in class. Felicia, for example, called the course passive: ‘It might be less theory and more practice’, she said. Eva said that the lack of opportunity to practice English in the classroom meant that she felt scared when she had to use the language outside the classroom:Practice is the best thing to learn. When we were by the school we were in a lot of contact with English, but when I had to go out to work and 172 Ident ity and Language Learningspeak the language, I was so scared. You don’t have the practice, just the structures.Although all the women agreed they needed the opportunity to practice English in the classroom, they did not agree on what kind of curriculum the language teacher should follow. The women had different expectations of formal language classes because of their unique experiences of natural language learning outside the classroom. They looked to the formal lan-guage classroom to complement the kind of learning that took place in other sites. Thus Mai, for example, who had the opportunity to speak English in the workplace, wanted the opportunity to write in the ESL class: ‘Speaking I can learn every way – outside, in the bus, on the bus, or on the train. Everywhere. But for reading and writing I have to go to school.’ Martina, on the other hand, who had a great deal of writing practice in her upgrad-ing courses, wanted the opportunity to talk in the ESL class: ‘If I wrote, I can correct by myself and I can think about it. The problem with speaking – I don’t have time to think about it. But if I write something, it’s not big problem.’As a result of their experiences of natural language learning, the women also indicated that they would like an ESL course to familiarize them with the cultural practices of Canadian society. As Eva said of the ESL course, ‘We were talking about different things I didn’t know and I didn’t hear about it. In home I stay in the Polish community and don’t hear about it.’ The women suggested that the ESL course had given them a rather ideal-ized picture of the kinds of communicative contexts in which they would be required to use English outside the classroom. Martina gave a graphic example of this with reference to the job interview process: ‘After the ESL course when I had the interview, they asked me very different questions, the ones that we didn’t study in school and I was very surprised.’ Such a comment was an echo of a previous statement she had made on another occasion:Ya, I was there. I had interview about two hours long. They want to know everything about me. They asked different questions. I never heard these question. Some question was ‘What I will do if the boss was shout-ing at me.’ And I was very surprised. I thought ‘My boss never, never shouted at me.’ And I don’t know, I said ‘If I do something bad, I try to do better. And I will apologize.’ But I don’t know because never, never, I don’t think about it.On the basis of these data, it is possible to conclude that the women had the following expectations and desires of a formal ESL course: It should help students to learn the basics of English grammar, pronunciation and vocabu-lary, it should create opportunities for students to speak and write English so Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 173that they will not be scared to interact with target language speakers outside the classroom, and it should help students to become familiar with the cultural practices of their new society, without resorting to idealization. The study indicates, however, that language learning is not an abstract skill that can be easily transferred from one context to another. It is a social practice that engages the identities of learners in complex and sometimes contradic-tory ways. For example, the anxiety the women experienced when they attempted to speak outside the classroom was not an invariant characteristic of their ability in the target language. Their anxiety was differently con-structed in diverse encounters with target language speakers and must be understood with reference to their investment in particular kinds of social relationships. As demonstrated in Chapter 3, while the women could all speak in the company of friends, they were intimidated in different ways by different kinds of strangers. Eva could speak to strangers, but she was always self-conscious about her accent. Mai could speak to her co-workers but not to her boss. Katarina could speak to elderly people, but not to anglophone professionals. Martina could speak to anybody, but felt constantly inferior. Felicia could speak to her co-workers, but not in front of Peruvians who speak English fluently.The implications of these findings for second language teaching are as follows. First, unsurprisingly, the language teacher needs to help prepare learners to speak the target language outside the classroom. This is particu-larly important in the context of second, as opposed to foreign language classrooms. Burnaby and Sun (1989) found that the academic study of grammar, literature and literary texts, as opposed to a focus on spoken English, was appropriate for the uses of English as a foreign language in China. In second language contexts such as Canada, however, it is not enough for the learner to know the ‘theory’ and the ‘tenses system’; it is not enough for learners to have ‘the structures, but not the practise’. Language learners need regular practice in speaking and writing in the lan-guage classroom so that they can feel more confident in interaction with target language speakers outside the classroom. Second, the study indicates that it is equally important for the language teacher to understand what opportunities are available for the learner to interact with target language speakers outside the classroom and how these opportunities are socially structured. Unless the language teacher understands what possibilities are available for the language learner to speak outside the classroom, practice in the classroom may not facilitate practice outside the classroom. As a corollary of the second point, my study suggests that the language teacher needs to understand how learners respond to these opportunities to prac-tice and the extent to which learners create or resist opportunities to inter-act with target language speakers. In other words, the teacher needs to develop an understanding of the learners’ investments in the target lan-guage and their changing identities.174 Ident ity and Language LearningBeyond Communicative Language TeachingThe findings from the study will not come as any surprise to the lan-guage teacher who has been trained in the principles of communicative lan-guage teaching. As Savignon (1991) notes, communicative language teaching has become a term that in fact frames competence in terms of social interac-tion, and views the learner as a partner in the learning process:Drawing on current understanding of language use as social behavior, purposeful, and always in context, proponents of communicative lan-guage teaching offer a view of the language learner as a partner in learn-ing; they encourage learner participation in communicative events and self-assessment of progress. (p. 273)Notwithstanding the more critical European focus in communicative lan-guage teaching, going back to the 1970s (see Candlin, 1989), most theories of communicative language teaching do not address relations of power between language learners and target language speakers. In the North American context, a communicative approach to language teaching is associated most often with the Canale and Swain (1980) framework, while in England and Europe, the ‘notional–functional’ approach has pre-ceded communicative language teaching (see Breen & Candlin, 1980). While these approaches have had a profound effect on language teaching internationally, it is interesting that their limitations have achieved great-est attention in countries outside of the North American/European con-text. Thus I have noted, in the South African context, that innovations in language teaching have called into question dominant curriculum frame-works (Norton Peirce, 1989). As the South African scholar, Gardiner (1987) has argued:People’s English cannot construct itself upon the implementation of the English as a Second/Foreign Language principles generated so industri-ously and marketed so assiduously by British universities, publishers and agents of its Foreign Office. That would be tantamount to changing the names of the actors but retaining the same old play. Not only should future syllabi be reconceptualized; they must proceed from a different set of principles. (p. 60)The different set of principles that Gardiner refers to include the recognition of the political nature of language and a reconceptualization of the meaning of language competence. The spirit of Gardiner’s words is clearly evident in the work of such scholars as Janks (1997), Ndebele (1987) and Stein (1998), whose work has a more critical edge than that associated with dominant conceptions of communicative language teaching.Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 175In other parts of the world, such as China, critiques of communicative language teaching stem from a different source than that of the South African critiques. The research of Burnaby and Sun (1989), for example, indicates that Chinese teachers have mixed reactions to communicative language teaching methods because of the purposes for which English, in particular, is used in the country. While they believe communicative methods are appro-priate for students who plan to study in an English-speaking country, they are not appropriate for students living in China, who use the language pri-marily for reading and translation. Further, such teachers claim that com-municative methods call for resources that are not readily available in China, and that some teachers lack confidence in their ability to teach communica-tively. As one teacher said, ‘I can only teach English to some extent. If I am asked to give more explanations on the language and cultural differences, it’s impossible for me’ (Burnaby & Sun, 1989, p. 228).Another limitation of communicative language teaching methods is that many do not actively seek to engage the identities of language learners in the language teaching process. Even in dialogue journal writing, which is argu-ably a classic communicative teaching method, students are discouraged from writing about issues that directly engage their sense of who they are and how they relate to the social world. Thus Peyton and Reed’s (1990) handbook, Dialogue Journal Writing with Nonnative English Speakers, while claiming to ‘individualize language and content learning’ (p. 18), simultane-ously offers advice on how the teacher can prevent writing from becoming too personal:Some teachers are afraid that leaving the choice of topics entirely open to students encourages them to write about very personal topics or family matters that the teacher is not prepared to deal with, and that the writ-ing can turn into a counseling session. This does occur at times. However, it need not continue. Teachers can gently point out that they are not comfortable discussing that topic and introduce another one. (p. 67)Savignon (1991) notes, however, that communicative language teaching is an approach that looks to further language acquisition research to inform its development. While my study suggests that immigrant learners welcome some communicative language teaching in the classroom, it also suggests that communicative language teaching should take seriously the lived expe-riences of language learners. The study makes problematic the very notions of communicative competence, social interaction and social behavior. I have argued that the linguistic rules of use, while being appropriate to a given situation, may not be desirable if language teachers wish to address the silencing that language learners may experience in their communities. I have taken the position that any given social interaction must be understood with reference to relations of power between interlocutors as well as the 176 Ident ity and Language Learningongoing production of a language learner’s identity. It is for this reason that Eva felt bad in the Bart Simpson episode, and did not continue her interac-tion with Gail; it is for this reason that Felicia felt uninteresting when she struggled to interact with her co-workers at Fair Lawns Recreation Centre, and chose to listen to her co-workers rather than speak to them.But how does the teacher take seriously the lived experiences of language learners? How can the lives of language learners become an integral part of the second language curriculum when a teacher may have thirty students in the classroom, all with different histories, experiences and expectations? My position is that the identities and lived experiences of language learners are already part of the language learning/language teaching experience, whether or not this is formally recognized in the second language curriculum. What the language teacher needs to understand is how the identities of learners are engaged in the formal language classroom, and how this knowledge can help teachers facilitate the language learner’s interaction with target language speakers in the wider community. To illustrate and extend this argument, I draw attention to two stories of classroom resistance by Katarina and Felicia.Katarina’s story2Once the women had completed the six-month ESL course, two of the women, Katarina and Martina, were given the opportunity to take a nine-month subsidized English skills upgrading course. Katarina and Martina were in the same class and had the same teacher. After four months in this course, Katarina dropped out in anger and indignation. At a diary study meeting, Katarina explained why she did not want to attend the class, saying that she had come into conflict with her teacher because her teacher had said that Katarina’s English was not good enough to take a computer course. Katarina said that her teacher intimated that Katarina spoke ‘immigrant English’. Katarina was angry and never returned to the class.At the meeting, Katarina suggested that the instructor did not take her teaching job seriously because the students were immigrants. Katarina said she was made to feel stupid in class. Katarina liked her first ESL class, where she learnt new vocabulary, read the newspaper and learnt grammar, but with the second ESL teacher, she felt like a student in first grade. She objected to having to learn ‘72 definitions for test’ and listen to the teacher all day. At the meeting she asked Martina how she felt about the teacher, saying ‘Immigrants, immigrants – Martina, maybe you think this is normal?’ Martina, however, did not take exception to the instructor and remained in the course until she was awarded a certificate. Katarina, on the other hand, entered the computer course that was considered too advanced for her and successfully completed the 18-month program. Why did one woman feel angry and marginalized by the teacher’s pedagogy and ultimately drop out of the course, while the other remained indifferent and continued till the end?Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 177Felicia’s storyAt another diary study meeting, Felicia described her unhappy experi-ences in a Grade 12 ESL course that she was taking with a group of adult immigrants in a local school in Newtown. The teacher had asked each of the students to bring in information about their home country to share with the class. After the session, the teacher summarized the main points that had been raised, but neglected to mention the points that Felicia had made about Peru. Felicia was angry and asked the teacher why she had not included Peru in her summary. The teacher explained that Peru was not a major country under consideration. Felicia never returned to the class.In seeking to understand why Katarina and Felicia resisted attending their ESL classes, it is necessary to address the relationship between identity and formal language learning. As indicated in Chapter 5, Katarina had been a teacher in Poland and had taught for 17 years. In this position, she had accumulated valued symbolic capital. When she came to Canada, she could not find employment as a teacher, and enjoyed little status or respect as a part-time homemaker for the Community Service, a job that was only good ‘for now’. She eagerly sought recognition from people who were fellow pro-fessionals and wished to have a profession in which she could meet like-minded people. Thus Katarina had a great investment in her teachers, not only because in the learning of a second language ‘very important is a teacher’, but because she sought affirmation of her symbolic capital from her teachers.3 When Katarina felt that her English teacher in the skills course failed to acknowledge her professional history, positioning her as an immi-grant, she was angry. When, indeed, the teacher appeared to discourage Katarina from taking a computer course that would give her access to the very professional social networks she sought, she dropped out of the course. Katarina refused to take up the subject position of the uneducated, unskilled immigrant in her language class. And since the teacher appeared not to acknowledge her as a fellow professional, there was no subject position acceptable to Katarina in this social site. It was an act of resistance on her part to remove herself from the scene of conflict. Martina, in contrast, under-stood her teacher’s behavior as normal and did not resist being positioned as an immigrant – a recurring theme in the data. Although a highly educated person herself, she did not seek access to professional social networks and she did not expect her teachers to validate her history or personal experience. She successfully completed the upgrading course.With reference to Felicia’s response to her ESL teacher’s omission of Peru in a summing-up exercise, I thought at the time that Felicia had overreacted to this event. However, when I understand the event within the context of Peru as symbolic of Felicia’s own identity, the teacher’s marginalization of Peru takes on added significance. Felicia’s friends at work validated her Peruvian identity, but it appeared that her ESL teacher did not. Indeed, the 178 Ident ity and Language Learningvery reason why Felicia may have been accepted by her friends at work was because she took up the subject position of a wealthy Peruvian rather than a recent immigrant in the workplace. Felicia therefore had great investment in her identity as a Peruvian and it was important to her that this identity be validated. Dropping out of the Grade 12 ESL class was not only an act of resistance on Felicia’s part, but also a desperate attempt to hold onto her belief in the efficacy of her Peruvian identity, an identity which enabled her to claim the right to speak.In sum, I suggest that these stories demonstrate convincingly that the historically and socially constructed identity of learners influences the sub-ject position they take up in the language classroom and the relationship they establish with the language teacher. Whether or not the identities of a learner are recognized as part of the formal language curriculum, the peda-gogy that a teacher adopts in the classroom will nevertheless engage the identities of learners in diverse and sometimes contradictory ways. It is only by understanding the histories and lived experiences of language learners that the language teacher can create conditions that will facilitate social interaction both in the classroom and in the wider community, and help learners claim the right to speak. Likewise, unless learners believe that their investments in the target language are an integral and important part of the language curriculum, they may resist the teacher’s pedagogy, or possibly even remove themselves from the class entirely.Rethinking MulticulturalismHaving argued that the language teacher needs to incorporate the lived experiences of language learners into the formal language curriculum and take cognizance of their multiple and changing investments in the target language, I need to address the persistent question of how to do this. How can the language teacher make the identities and lived experiences of the language learner an integral part of classroom practice? To begin an explora-tion of this question, I will draw on data from Mai’s classroom experience in which the teacher attempted to incorporate the learners’ histories into the classroom context.Mai’s storyAfter the completion of the Employment and Immigration Canada course, Mai continued taking ESL courses at night in order to improve her spoken and written English. She had to make great sacrifices to attend these courses. After a long day at work, she rushed home, made dinner and rushed out again to take public transportation to her class. At night, she would come home, exhausted and with some dread that potential assailants were chasing Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 179after her while she was walking from her bus stop to her home at 10.30 pm. Given the sacrifices that Mai made to attend these courses, she expressed great frustration that she was not learning anything in one particular course she was attending. In an interview with Mai, I questioned her more closely about the way the teacher taught the course. Mai explained that it was cen-tred around student presentations of life in their home countries. She described how frustrating it was to sit for a whole lesson and listen to one student speak (emphasis added):I was hoping that the course would help me the same as we learnt [in the six-month ESL course], but some night we only spend time on one man. He came from Europe. He talked about his country: what’s happening and what was happening. And all the time we didn’t learn at all. And tomor-row the other Indian man speak something for there. Maybe all week I didn’t write any more on my book.After struggling through this course for a number of weeks, after feeling that she didn’t learn at all, Mai never went back to the class.It could be argued that the Mai’s ESL teacher was attempting to incor-porate the lived histories of the students into the classroom by inviting them to make public presentations about their native countries. The teacher was giving the students the opportunity to practice speaking in the class-room, and inviting them to share their heritage with the rest of the class. This approach, however, clearly backfired, at least as far as Mai was con-cerned. Mai was convinced that she did not learn at all when she sat mute, listening to a fellow classmate discuss his native country. Her classroom learning did not warrant the many sacrifices she had to make to attend the ESL class.I wish to argue that that there are at least three reasons why the teach-er’s methods silenced Mai rather than encouraged her active participation. First, the method presupposed that student experience is unidimensional. I have demonstrated in this book that identity is not a fixed category, but one that is multiple and changing. While an immigrant learner’s experi-ences in his or her native country may be an important part of a learner’s identity, these experiences are constantly being mediated by the learner’s experiences in the new country, across multiple sites in the home, workplace and community. What Mai’s teacher did was to validate only one aspect of the learners’ histories. The teacher did not provide the learn-ers with the opportunity to critically examine their experiences in their native country in the light of more recent experiences in Canada, or to critically examine their experiences in Canada in light of experiences in their native countries. The teacher’s approach is one which exoticizes multiculturalism, rather than critically engages it. As Schenke (1991, p. 48) has noted,180 Ident ity and Language LearningThe question of how histories, stories, and memories are made to be true in relation to the persuasions of discourse is fundamental to an understanding of how speaking and silence get shaped and regulated within ESL practice. Taking multiculturalism as a case in point, what comes to count as students’ speaking is often little more that an atom-ized and disconnected ‘exchange’ of cultural exoticisms and curiosities. Divested of the lived histories and relations of power through which they come to be told, such stories populate classroom knowledge with racial, religious, gendered, and culinary eccentricities (the list goes on) that defy any engagement other than that of a ‘friendly and respectful’ acknowledgment of cultural pluralisms.Second, the method did not take into account that the learners may have little investment in one another’s presentations. While the teacher might have considered her teaching methods student-centred and the students partners in learning, the approach could be regarded as little more than transmission teaching in a multicultural guise. Such disconnected exchanges in the classroom give listeners few entry points for discussion and critique. Mai had no investment in her fellow student’s description of his home country in Europe; she had no stake in learning about life in India. As she said to her co-workers in The Fabric Factory, who wanted her to learn Italian, ‘The thing I need now is English language.’ Mai wanted the opportunity to practice English in the ESL classroom; she did not want to be a passive recipient of another student’s exotic stories. In Bourdieu’s terms as described in preceding chapters, the ESL classroom was not a legitimate context for such stories. It was for this reason that Mai felt she didn’t learn at all in her ESL class and that a potentially rich opportunity for language learning and teaching had been forfeited. Mai’s story illus-trates that incorporating student experiences into the classroom should be a more complicated process than commodifying multicultural histories in the form of student presentations. Indeed, it problematizes the very notion of multicultural education, a theme that is receiving increasingly critical attention in the field of second language education. Kubota (1999), for example, argues persuasively that applied linguistics literature on the teaching of writing creates a cultural dichotomy between the East and the West, constructing essentialist representations of Japanese culture. She argues for a critical multiculturalism in which language teachers need to go beyond simply affirming and respecting the culture of the Other and romanticizing its authentic voices’ (Kubota, 1999, p. 27). She suggests, instead, that such teachers need to explore how cultural differences as a form of knowledge are produced and perpetuated, and how teachers can work towards social transformaton.Third, the method was tantamount to an abdication of the teacher’s authority. This is a theme discussed insightfully by Giroux (1988), who uses Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 181the notion of the teacher’s ‘emancipatory authority’ (1988, p. 90) to argue that teachers are intellectuals who need to play an active and critical role in the classroom:The concept of emancipatory authority suggests that teachers are bearers of critical knowledge, rules, and values through which they consciously articulate and problematize their relationship to each other, to students, to the subject matter, and to the wider community. Such a view of authority challenges the dominant view of teachers as primarily techni-cians or public servants, whose role is primarily to implement rather than conceptualize pedagogical practice. The category of emancipatory authority dignifies teachers’ work by viewing it as a form of intellectual practice.In this view, student-centred learning does not presuppose that the teacher is invisible in the classroom, who simply affirms student experience but has little authority or expertise to provide direction and critique of such experi-ence. The challenge for the teacher is to develop a practice which, as Simon (1992) argues, acknowledges student experience as legitimate curricular con-tent while simultaneously challenging both the substance and the form of such experience. With this caveat in mind, I turn now to an analysis of the diary study as a particular kind of practice that offered possibilities for the engagement of student experience and student identity, but which ultimately did not fully realize its transformative potential.The Diary Study as a Pedagogy of PossibilityWith reference to data from the study and the stories of Katarina, Felicia and Mai in particular, I have argued that the language teacher needs to help language learners bridge the gap between their learning of the target lan-guage in the language classroom and their opportunities to practice it in the wider community. In order to bridge this gap, I have suggested that the lived experiences and identities of language learners need to be incorporated into the formal curriculum. I have noted, however, that essentializing student experience will compromise the conditions necessary for reflection and cri-tique of personal experience in the classroom. I now wish to address what type of pedagogy might be productive in the teaching of a second language to immigrant language learners. Drawing on Simon (1992, p. 56), I am using the term pedagogy to distinguish it from the term teaching:In staff rooms and classrooms, teaching manuals and curriculum guide-lines, teaching is most commonly referred to as the strategies and tech-niques used in order to meet a set of predefined (often given) set of 182 Ident ity and Language Learningobjectives. Not unsurprisingly, talk and writing about teaching are pri-marily carried out in the language of method for the purpose of propos-ing viable classroom suggestions . . . But in my view, something is missing from such discussion of teaching. When we teach, we are always implicated in the construction of a horizon of possibility for ourselves, our students, and our communities . . . To propose a pedagogy is to pro-pose a political vision.Like Simon, and countless other second language educators, my teaching is centrally concerned with the enhancement of human possibility. In attempt-ing to bridge the gap between language learning in classrooms and communi-ties, I would like to suggest that the diary study itself represented what Simon would call a pedagogy of possibility for the immigrant women in my study. In this section, I examine the purposes, strengths and limitations of the diary study as a form of pedagogy before turning to a consideration of how insights from the diary study might inform practice in second language classrooms.The diary study was framed as a project about the learning of English as a second language in Canada. The way that it proceeded, however, was a project about the complexities of living as a woman in a new and some-times threatening society, coping with the daily demands of family, work, schooling, housing, unemployment – much of which was conducted in a language that was only just beginning to make sense. It took place at a time when the women were beginning to question the usefulness of formal ESL classes and were confronting the lack of congruence between their under-standing of the world and their experience of it in Canada. It was a time when they saw the need for practice in the target language, but also a time when they were beginning to understand that their access to anglophone social networks was compromised by their position as immigrants in Canadian society. It was a time when they had a lot to ask, much to say and a great deal to resist.Though scarcely articulated at the time, the model of the diary study that was used in the research had its origins in the consciousness-raising groups associated with the second wave of feminism that Weiler (1991) describes in her work. Through the collective exploration of personal experiences of lan-guage learning and social interaction with members of the target language group, I hoped that the participants would uncover, in the words of Haug (1987, p. 41), ‘the points at which change is possible, the points where our chains chafe most, the point where accommodations have been made’. While my role within the group remained that of teacher/researcher, my authority was not derived from hierarchical educational structures, but rather from my command of the target language and my history as the former teacher of the participants in the study. It may also have been derived from my position as a professional, white, middle-class member of the dominant anglophone Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 183 community, a woman with access to desirable symbolic and material resources. However, partly because I had come to know and understand some aspects of the respective histories of each of the women – the talent and resources they had brought with them to Canada – I believe the women felt comfortable in my presence. Certainly, whatever authority I may have had did not appear to silence them.It is possible that the very architecture of the diary study meetings helped to reduce the power differentials associated with the more formal ESL class-room. We were all located in the private sphere of a home, where the domes-tic position of a woman as homemaker is more foregrounded than her professional position as teacher/researcher. We sat in a circle, the configura-tion of which changed each week. The only blackboard was a child’s black-board which was used on rare occasions. Such a setting, I believe, not only reduced the power differentials between me as a teacher and them as stu-dents, but also reframed the women’s expectations of whose knowledge was considered more legitimate and valid. Further, not only was my status as teacher reframed, but so was the status of the students. In this context, I was not the gatekeeper of a finite body of knowledge, nor were the women stu-dents who vied with each other for access to my closely guarded resources. This had, I believe, a significant impact on the comfort levels in the group. Given the non-stop discussion that characterized our meetings, I think that the setting was a relatively egalitarian one. However, though the relation-ships between the women were equitable, their experiences as immigrant women were differently constructed across time and space. A fundamental premise of the diary study, reinforced by the architecture of the setting, was that each woman was an expert on her own life. Through the use of the weekly charts, the diary entries and the feedback to the women, I tried to help each woman explore and articulate in English her personal experiences of language learning in the home, the workplace, the school and the com-munity. This approach was a radical departure from the pedagogy that had been used in the ESL course, where writing was primarily confined to filling in blanks and writing decontextualized sentences. Indeed, my purpose was to create conditions to promote what Cameron et al. (1992) have referred to as ‘empowering research’.In reflecting on why it was that the diary study was a particularly impor-tant source of data on identity and language learning, I have found the work of Clark and Ivanic (1997) helpful. Drawing on their research on the teaching of writing, they demonstrate that acts of writing depend on the multiple identities that writers bring to such acts and propose four interrelated factors that contribute to the notion of the writer identity: The autobiographical self is one that has been shaped by a writer’s life-history up to the moment of writing, the discoursal self addresses the ongoing construction of identity implicated in each act of writing, and the self as author addresses the question of ownership and voice in the writing process. These three writer identities, 184 Ident ity and Language Learningin turn, are understood in the context of a larger, more abstract notion of writer identity which addresses the subject positions that are available to writers within particular communities, at particular points in time. It is pos-sible that the diary study provided subject positions for these women that had hitherto not been available in their experience as immigrant language learners, and that they were able to explore, to a greater or lesser extent, their autobiographical, discoursal and authorial identities in the act of construct-ing each diary entry.At the risk of idealizing the outcomes of the diary study, I think that the quality and quantity of writing that the women produced and the range of issues that we discussed in the meetings were remarkable.4 Topics included children’s schooling, workplace conflict, popular tv programs, stories from the women’s native countries, the weather, the recession and the Gulf War. After scarcely a year and a half in Canada, the women were able to make themselves clearly understood in both spoken and written form in the target language. This is not to say that their grammar was excellent, their pronun-ciation clear and their vocabulary extensive – rather, they were able to give voice to the complexity of their experience. Furthermore, it was at least of symbolic importance that, as the diary study progressed, the women began relating stories of how they had stood up for their rights in the workplace. At one diary study meeting, for example, Mai, Felicia and Eva described how they had resisted exploitative actions in their respective jobs. The stories which follow illustrate how central language was in this process.In Mai’s workplace, one of the workers had asked her to turn some very heavy drapes inside out, a job normally reserved for another stronger worker at the factory. Although on a previous occasion, Mai had reluctantly agreed to do this, she had felt frustrated and angry at having acquiesced. This time, when asked to do the task again, Mai had told the worker that, if she wanted Mai to do the job, the worker had to check it out with the supervisor first. The worker had been surprised and never asked Mai to perform this task again. After Mai had spoken up, Felicia then relayed a story about how she had spoken up for her rights at a school where she was doing after-school childcare. One teacher had apparently told Felicia, in front of a parent, not to record the children’s names in a particular format. Felicia felt angry and humiliated, but refused to remain silent. She turned to the teacher and said, ‘Either I am the teacher or you are. If you are, I am going home.’ Eva then relayed a story about how the manager tried to send her home early one day when work was slow but had still retained the part-time workers. Eva had felt angry and had said that it was not fair that she – a full-time worker – should have to go home while the part-time workers were allowed to remain on-site. (Eva would not get paid for the hours she went home early.) The next day, Eva had felt sick and had decided to stay home. She simply told the management that she was not coming in to work. Eva said she thought this worried the management and, the next day when she returned to work, Eva Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 185had been given more responsible work to do. She felt happy that she had spoken up.Notwithstanding these stories, however, I think the focus of our meetings was more on the expression of experience than the analysis of experience. While there was much discussion on how being positioned as an immigrant constrained the opportunities for the women to interact with anglophones, there was little reflection on the ways in which gender, class and race were implicated in larger, inequitable social structures. Three examples will illus-trate this point. First, at one diary study meeting, Felicia was expressing con-cern at her husband’s unemployed status, saying she pitied him. Katarina expressed her sympathy for Felicia’s plight by saying: ‘Women can always clean the house, but men must do something.’ There was general agreement with the sexist assumptions underlying this statement: in other words, that the work women do in the home is not classified as doing something5; and that employment is a right for men and by extension only a privilege for women. Second, in an interview I had with Eva just before our first diary study meeting, Eva was explaining why her co-workers at Munchies did not talk to her: ‘I think because when I didn’t talk to them, and they didn’t ask me, maybe they think I’m just like – because I had to do the worst type of work there. It’s normal.’ Eva said that it was understandable – ‘normal’ – that a person who had a job with little status should be marginalized by co-work-ers. Eva never challenged the classist assumptions underlying this statement. Third, when I was taking Mai home from a diary study meeting, Mai was describing the alienation that her nephews experienced as Chinese/Vietnamese people in Canada. The eldest child, Trong, for example, had chosen to change his name from a Vietnamese one to an anglicized one. Mai told me that she had encouraged her nephews not to reject their heritage, explaining ‘With your hair, your nose, your skin, you will never be perfect Canadians’. Mai did not problematize the racist belief that perfect Canadians exist and that perfect Canadians are white.I did not take up these issues with the women, but let them pass. During the course of the diary study I did not know how and to what extent I should disorganize and challenge the commonsense understandings of gender, class and race that the women expressed. My position as researcher and my desire to maintain solidarity with the women, to create a comfortable space where they could express their confusion, their anger and their joy, kept me silent. I could affirm, but not negate. The danger of remaining silent on such issues, however, became apparent to me in a telephone call I had with Katarina in January 1993, long after the diary study was over. She was telling me that she had moved from her old apartment block to a new one. It was with pride that she said, ‘There are very few immigrants here. It’s mainly old people.’ It became immediately apparent to me that she was implicated in reinforcing and reproducing the marginalizing discourse on immigrants. Furthermore, as the diary study progressed, it also became apparent to me that Mai could 186 Ident ity and Language Learningnot or chose not to discuss with the group the racism that her extended family had experienced in Canada. The only times when she expressed con-cern about her brother’s attitudes towards Vietnamese people, about the fact that her nephews hated their appearance, were in moments when the two of us were alone together. Such times arose when I was driving her to or from her home, or when we were both waiting for other members of the group to arrive for the start of a meeting. Mai used her diary to express feelings of anxiety and alienation, but often chose not to read particularly troublesome experiences to the group.Harper, Norton Peirce and Burnaby (1996) make the point that attempts to incorporate women’s experience in the second language classroom para-doxically may serve to maintain the present status and conditions that women face at work and in society at large. Accommodating women’s expe-rience rather than problematizing it ultimately may not work in the best interests of women. They stress the importance of identifying and intensify-ing the moments where an opening is created for critical reflection on issues of gender and race. This theme is addressed insightfully by Schenke (1996, p. 156) who draws on her feminist/antiracist work to argue for a practice of what she calls historical engagement in the ESL classroom.By historical, I refer to the ways in which we live our personal and collec-tive histories in the present and how acts of remembering can fashion new stories out of the familiar refrains of the old. By engagement, I refer to the willingness to involve ourselves (students and teachers) strategi-cally in critical analyses of the cultural/racial/gendered production of our everyday lives.Such memory work, she argues, is not just a way of sharing personal experi-ences, but a way of investigating how and what we choose to remember, how such choices are socially and historically constructed, and how we can remember differently. The focus of such memory work is the recognition that language learners come to classrooms already knowing and that the struggle to understand new cultural practices proceeds from memories and experiences of past cultural practices.Such insights are shared by Stein (1998) who, working in a South African context, describes the way in which a teacher can use performance and auto-biographical narrative to interpret, rename and validate students’ histories and experiences of literacy. Drawing on the work of Simon (1992), she describes how her students have been doing a pedagogy of remembrance in which the past is rediscovered by the present in a way that gives hope for the future. Collaboration is central to her pedagogy, in that students work together to help one another interrogate the frame in which memories are constructed. She cautions, however, that ‘the process of remembering is not merely an act of repetition of the past but an act of remembering or collecting Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 187one’s “members” – one’s prior selves and the figures and events that belong to one’s life story – in a purposeful and conscious way’ (1998, p. 523).The relevance of such insights for my study is profound, helping me to understand Katarina’s resistance to the teacher who did not validate her identity as a fellow professional, or Felicia’s anger at the teacher who knew little of her memories and experiences of Peru. There is another dimension to the analysis, however. In this book I have noted that it is not only engage-ment with historical memory that is important in understanding identity and language learning, but also engagement with alternative identities that are site, and not time, specific. Thus Martina, for example, in claiming the right to speak in her workplace, drew on her memories as a mother, memo-ries constructed in the private domain of her life, to reframe her relationship with her co-workers, who populated the public domain of her life: ‘The girl is only 12 years old. She is younger than my son. And I said, “No, you are doing nothing. You can go and clean the tables or something.”’ By claiming a new identity within the discourses of the workplace, Martina could claim the right to speak. How teachers might help language learners claim new identities, reframe their relationships with target language speakers and claim the right to speak, is addressed in the next section.Transforming Monday MorningIn his paper on the concept of method, Pennycook (1989) argues persua-sively that language teachers need to understand our practice, not in terms of totalizing or universal discourses on methods, but in terms of local com-plexities and possibilities. In different parts of the globe, this challenge has been taken up by teachers in elementary and secondary classrooms, colleges and communities. While Canagarajah (1993) in Sri Lanka and Lin (1996) in Hong Kong, for example, address the ambivalent responses of students to the dominance of English in their societies, Kalantzis, Cope and Slade (1989) in Australia address the response of the education system to the increasing lin-guistic diversity of the student population. The central point here, as Morgan (1998) notes, is that teachers need to respond to the particular challenges and possibilities of their own communities. ‘If theoretical knowledge is to be relevant’, he suggests, ‘it must begin by negotiation and a considerable amount of local autonomy’ (1998, p. 131).It is in this spirit that I have drawn on insights from the diary study, the literature I have read and my own classroom experience to offer some sug-gestions as to how the identities and investments of language learners can be integrated into the language classroom. In providing a framework for what I have called classroom-based social research I do not, however, wish to advo-cate a new method of language teaching. I offer this framework as a contri-bution to conversations on language teaching that have begun long before 188 Ident ity and Language Learningthis study was conducted and will no doubt continue for years to come. Without neglecting a focus on grammar, pronunciation and vocabulary (the basics), I will argue that classroom-based social research might help the learner understand how opportunities to speak are socially structured, how the learner might create possibilities for social interaction with target lan-guage speakers, and how the teacher might gain insight into the learners’ identities and investments. In this regard, it is a response to an observation by Bremer et al. (1996, p. 236) that ‘Classroom learning needs to be comple-mented by structured opportunities outside the classroom for minority workers to interact with speakers of the dominant language’. It is inspired by observations of Martina, who, in constructing for herself alternative iden-tities from which to speak, has simultaneously opened up such possibilities for other learners.I define classroom-based social research as collaborative research that is carried out by language learners in their local communities with the active guidance and support of the language teacher. The goals of such research are for learners to investigate systematically, with the use of observation charts and log books, what opportunities they have to interact with target language speakers, whether in the home, the workplace or the community. Through social research, the learners will become increasingly aware of the opportuni-ties available to them to use the target language in the wider community and how they might transform such possibilities in keeping with their desires for the future. As well, learners are encouraged to reflect critically on their engagement with target language speakers. That is, learners are encouraged to investigate the conditions under which they interact with target language speakers, how and why such interactions take place and what results follow from such interaction. In this way, learners will develop insight into the way in which opportunities to speak are socially structured, and how social rela-tions of power are implicated in the process of social interaction. As learners develop an understanding of how power acts on and through social interac-tion, they might learn to challenge social practices of marginalization. Learners are encouraged to pay particular attention to those moments when an occurrence, action or event, surprises them or strikes them as unusual. By recording their surprises in the data collection process, learners become more aware of differences between cultural practices in their native countries and cultural practices in their new society. Given the identity of student researcher/ethnographer rather than adult immigrant, they may be able to critically engage their histories and their memories from a position of strength rather than a position of weakness. With this enhanced awareness, the learner can use the language teacher as an important resource for further learning.Learners may reflect on their observations in diaries or journals. This creates opportunities for them to write about issues in which they have a particular investment. Learners can use their diaries to critically examine any Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 189communication breakdowns that may have occurred with target language speakers. These diaries can be written in the target language and collected regularly by the teacher for comment and feedback. The diaries give the language teacher access to information about the learners’ opportunities to practice the target language in the wider community, their investments in the target language and their changing identities. The teacher can help the learner critically reflect on findings from the research and make suggestions for further research and reflection where necessary. Finally, learners can use the data they have collected as material for their language classrooms, to be compared and contrasted with the findings of their fellow ethnographers. In comparing and contrasting their data with other learners, the learners will have an investment in the presentations that their fellow students make, and a meaningful exchange of information may ensue. Learners may begin to see one another as part of a social network in which symbolic resources can be produced, validated and exchanged. The teacher can also use this informa-tion to structure classroom activities and develop classroom materials that will help learners claim the right to speak in the wider community. Furthermore, the teacher will be able to guide classroom discussion from a description of the findings of the research to a consideration of what the research might indicate about broader social processes in society. In this way, the teacher can help learners interrogate their relationship to these larger social processes, and find spaces for the enhancement of human possibility.Concluding CommentI would like to conclude this book with a reflection on the following comment by Luke (2002, p. 79):While recognising that a significant majority of migrants continue to be positioned in lower socioeconomic classes and localities in the countries of the EEC, North America, Japan, Australia and other Asia-Pacific econ-omies – much as their postwar predecessors were – there is also the need to develop narrative descriptions of minority identity that are not victim-oriented, that begin to describe the complexity, the play and the power of new identities of difference within white-dominated cultures, and that supplant the liberal condescension that continues, to cite Bob Dylan’s 1960s song, to ‘pity the poor immigrant’.This, I believe, is a timely reminder that in an era of increasing globalization, language teachers need to rethink our conceptions of the immigrant students we encounter in our classrooms, whether young or old, female or male, rich or poor, Asian or English. Equally important, we need to re-examine our own identities as teachers, researchers, community members and global citizens. 190 Ident ity and Language LearningIn this book I have argued that essentialist notions of language learners are untenable, and that it is only by acknowledging the complexity of identity that we can gain greater insight into the myriad challenges and possibilities of language learning and language teaching in the new millennium.Notes(1) Felicia had already received instruction in English grammar in Peru, where she had learnt ‘the verb “to be” and nothing else’.(2) As a foil to Katarina’s story, I have included an account from Martina, who was in the same upgrading course as Katarina was.(3) It is instructive to note, by way of comparison, that Katarina never took offense when the elderly people she worked for asked her questions that could potentially have been offensive, such as why she had come to Canada without knowing English.(4) Auerbach (1989) notes similar writing progress in what she calls a social–contextual approach to ESL literacy for adult immigrants.(5) See Rossiter (1986) for an insightful analysis of the social construction of homemaking.Claiming the Right to Speak in Classrooms and Communit ies 191192AfterwordClaire KramschOnce in a while, the scholarly work of a well-known applied linguist like Bonny Norton acquires a momentous historical significance because it cap-tures an important shift in the spirit of the times. That shift can be fully appreciated only in retrospect, and it is therefore timely that Bonny revisits her work in a second edition of Identity and Language Learning, published over a decade ago. On 22 April 2007 at the AAAL annual convention in Costa Mesa, California, over coffee, Bonny started telling me about growing up in the 70s during apartheid South Africa, the horror of it, the racial and linguis-tic segregation, the domination of Afrikaans, and her commitment to People’s English (Norton Peirce, 1987). I suddenly understood how much personal experience accounted for the passion of a researcher’s work; it explained the perspective Bonny had chosen to explore her object of inquiry – the teaching of ESL in a country where language was ‘in transition’. Bonny’s passionate interest in issues of identity and social justice made sense in light of the brutal suppression of social and civic identities under apartheid. Her focus on investment in SLA and the forging of imagined communities of English speakers echoed the ‘pedagogy of possibility’ she had advocated given her history in South Africa (Norton Peirce, 1989). For the first time I understood the extent to which Bonny’s notion of identity in language learning was tied to the social injustices she had so intensely witnessed in her own past. For the first time, I understood that learning English could indeed represent the hope of a better, more equitable, more democratic form of life.I grew up in the 40s under different skies, in different times. France under German occupation was no South Africa, but it had its own ter-rors and its specific horrors. Post-war France was obsessed with recovering its sense of national identity, and with finding a way to reconnect with a ‘hereditary enemy’ that had threatened its identity for more than 80 years. My interest in German language and literature was a way of transcending those traditional hostilities and recapturing the potential of literature to heal identities badly wounded during the war (Kramsch, 2010). But ultimately, my multilingual and multicultural family background made me less inter-ested in issues of national identity than in linguistic and cultural subject positions. How should I position myself as a French person now expatriated and teaching German in the United States? To what extent did SLA research inform the teaching of languages other than English? As the teaching of culture became an object of research in US foreign language education (Kramsch, 1993), I was led to focus less on identity than on subjectivity in SLA (Kramsch, 2009, 2012). Indeed, I had experienced first-hand how differ-ent languages could literally construct multilingual subjects who either hated or loved one another, often both at the same time. Attracted by such paradoxes, I gravitated naturally towards poststructuralism and found common interests with Bonny Norton, albeit from a postmodern angle. For the first time, I understood that, for English speakers, learning a language other than English could indeed represent the hope of a less parochial, more cosmopolitan form of life.Bonny’s pathbreaking Identity and Language Learning (Norton, 2000), written at the end of the 90s, provided a platform to talk about issues of identity in a new, narrative way. Memorably captured by the individual stories of five immigrant women to Canada, identity acquired a face and a heart. Readers could identify with Eva, Mai, Katarina, Martina and Felicia in ways that had not been possible in previous SLA research. The personal rapport of the teacher/researcher with her students/informants opened up the possibility of ‘doing’ SLA in new ways that engaged not only the lin-guistic and the cognitive but also the affective and the cultural dimensions of language learning. At the end of the 90s, Bonny Norton’s book undoubt-edly responded in the right way at the right time to the concerns of lan-guage educators regarding culture in the teaching of foreign languages (Kramsch, 1993) and identity in the teaching of English (Norton Peirce, 1995). But why did identity become such an important topic in SLA at the end of the 90s?Why the Interest in Social and Cultural Identity in SLA?Beyond the differences in life trajectories, both Bonny and I were respond-ing to larger historical forces that shaped our work and our respective relation-ship to SLA. The first was of a disciplinary nature. After more than 20 years of its mainly psycholinguistic existence, SLA research was under increasing pressure to take account of the social factors that facilitate or inhibit language acquisition. In the 80s, advances in interactionist SLA (see, for example, the work of Michael Long, Sue Gass and Merrill Swain, among many others) showed that social interaction was essential to acquiring the ability to use language for communicative purposes – and communicative competence was seen as the uncontested goal of SLA. In addition, the translation into English first of Vygotsky (in particular Vygotsky, 1978), then of Bakhtin (1981), brought a socially grounded Soviet psychology and a dialogic view of language Af terword 193to the attention of Western applied linguists. Together with others (e.g. Merrill Swain, Aneta Pavlenko, Steven Thorne), Lantolf developed the influ-ential sociocultural theory of SLA, in which collaborative learning played a major role in facilitating acquisition (Lantolf, 2000; Lantolf & Thorne, 2006). Both interactionist SLA and sociocultural SLA lay the ground for what Block has called ‘the social turn in SLA’ (Block, 2003) and its concern for the social and cultural identity of language learners.The second historical force to bring about a concern for identity was the large-scale migrations that occurred at the end of the 80s as a result of the deregulation of international markets (Cameron, 2006) and the ensuing eco-nomic and cultural globalization. Due to this increased global mobility, national societies became more heterogeneous and multicultural, their sense of community became more ‘imagined’ than ever. The question ‘Who am I (as a citizen, a woman, a minority, an immigrant, a gendered person)?’ now looms large for native and non-native speakers alike, embroiled as they have been in identity politics and their struggles for recognition. Whether they are new immigrants assessing their possibilities for the future or long-time US residents assessing the changed face of America, questions of social and national identity have become more important in the last 15 years, especially since 9/11/2001.The third historical development to account for an interest in identity in SLA came from the advances in information technologies, the internet and networked computers at the end of the 80s. For the first time, people could communicate online with texts, images, videos and with other fellow com-puter users; they could have access to hypertexts and hyper-realities; they could adopt virtual selves and don alternative identities. Today Facebook and the blogosphere offer opportunities for re-inventing oneself and for develop-ing multiple identities in interaction with others online.These larger geopolitical upheavals accelerated the spread of global capi-talism and the desire for a global mode of communication: English as lingua franca. The transformation of English from a national language to a global language gave issues of identity a crucial importance: who am I when I speak English? Or, as Bonny Norton put it, how do I understand my relationship to the world and my possibilities for the future? Within a poststructuralist perspective, how does the use of the English language itself construct a world that is different from the one constructed in my mother tongue? And do I want to belong to that world? These are existential questions that, 12 years after the first publication of Identity in Language Learning, still elicit conflict-ing answers. In fact, after 9/11 and the many wars that ensued, the role of English and the multiple identities it promises may have become more ambig-uous than they were when Identity and Language Learning was first published. A look at the three highly influential concepts put forth by Bonny Norton and their theoretical sources of inspiration may give us a clue as to why this might be so.194 Ident ity and Language LearningThree Infl uential ConceptsIt is instructive to examine the three major concepts that underpin Norton’s theory of identity in language learning: investment, identity and imagined community. All three are anchored in a social constructionist theory of the individual, the self and the nation. In line with the desire for a more socially just world, Bonny found in these three concepts an expression of her desire to reclaim the right of language learners to take ownership of English, to liberate themselves from imposed identities, and to build com-munities of practice constituted along lines other than the institutional com-munities imposed by society.Norton’s notion of investment, a strong dynamic term with economic con-notations, was to replace the traditional term ‘motivation’ in SLA. Unlike motivation, investment carries connotations of hopes of returns and benefits; it accentuates the role of human agency and identity in engaging with the task at hand, in accumulating economic and symbolic capital, in having stakes in the endeavor and in persevering in that endeavor. In the North American context, investment in SLA has become synonymous with ‘lan-guage learning commitment’ and is based on a learner’s intentional choice and desire. In this view, learners are no longer passively structured by power-ful institutions; nor are they simply moved to learn what others teach them. They can exercise agency, claim their right to be heard, change perceptions and institutional prejudices, and strive to become whoever they want to be.Indeed, Norton’s concept of identity is ‘discursively constructed’ and ‘always socially and historically embedded’ (Introduction, this volume). This means that the kind of person we claim to be is always open to challenge and redefinition with shifts in the discursive context. In SLA this means, for example, that on the one hand, an immigrant need not be the deficient non-native speaker that her co-workers construct her to be; she can strive to be whoever she reclaims herself to be, based on the multiple identities she can choose from. On the other hand, this new identity might be seen by others as incompatible with theirs; it might be contested and thus has to be con-stantly re-assessed and re-negotiated under new social power relations.Such an uncertainty might be unsettling for immigrants who are used to relying on people in authority (the government, a landlord, a boss, a teacher) to grant them what they need, but the constant changes in power relations implied in Norton’s concept of ‘identity’ are precisely what enables immi-grants and learners of English to envisage other scenarios of possibility than the realities they are living under. The communities they wish to belong to might not be those around them but imagined communities, nourished by the hopes of economic mobility associated with the English language. Imagined communities are aspirational communities that are also built and sustained, sometimes online. United by common aspirations, learners of English around the world dream of such values as freedom, democracy, agency and power. Af terword 195The internet holds the promise of being born again into a better world, of reinventing oneself. It promises new and more powerful social identities by reclaiming the right to speak (as a human right or a civil right) and having one’s voice heard.These ideals are shared by the many scholars who have followed Bonny Norton in fighting against a reductionist theory of the language learner in SLA research (see Introduction, this volume). They have used her notions of investment and imagined communities to underscore the political dimension of SLA, namely language learning through community participation and global cooperation in the public sphere. However, since the first publication of Identity in Language Learning, the attacks against the World Trade Center in 2001, the world-wide financial crisis of 2008, the never-ending war against global terrorism and the rising gap on the global level between rich and poor have put these ideals to the test. What is the future of Norton’s investment, identity and imagined communities in SLA?The Future of the ‘Right to Speak’To theorize the gap between the dreams and the realities of English lan-guage use in the 21st century it is instructive to go back to the three thinkers who inspired Bonny Norton’s theory of identity in SLA: Pierre Bourdieu, Chris Weedon and Benedict Anderson. All three fought in the 80s against the reductionist views of their field and their work has had the impact it has had precisely because they were, like Bonny Norton with SLA research, bucking the trend in their time.As a sociologist, Pierre Bourdieu (1982) fought against the fallacy of the autonomous individual. In reaction to rational actor theory, which posits the individual as a social actor taking rational decisions based on a rational assessment of the costs and benefits of human action, Bourdieu considered an individual’s habitus as unconsciously structured by the fields in which he/she finds himself (e.g. family, school, workplace); in turn, by acting according to their habitus, individuals structure the fields in which they operate. It is through this interaction of habitus and field that people gain a practical sense of who they are and who they can become. In order to be successful, ‘all participants must believe in the game they are playing, and in the value of what is at stake in the struggles they are waging’ (ibidem, my emphasis). According to him, the very existence and persistence of the game or field presuppose a total and unconditional ‘investment’, a practical and unquestioning belief in the game and its stakes. Note the use of the modal ‘must’ here. Bourdieu is not enunciating a moral imperative but rather, as a sociologist, spelling out the rules of the game of cultural reproduction as social destiny. Bourdieu’s views on the game have a realistic edge and a survivalist flavor that echoes much of what many people feel today.196 Ident ity and Language LearningAs a feminist and cultural theorist, Chris Weedon (1987) fought against innatist theories of the self. Defining subjectivity as ‘our sense of ourselves’ (1987, p. 21), she argued that an individual’s subjectivity is constructed, not innate; it is not genetically determined, but socially produced. She called this stance ‘poststructuralist’ because it eschews fixed categories of identity and embeds the construction of identity in a never-ending struggle over power. This struggle may lead to change but may also reinforce the status quo. ‘Unlike humanism, which implies a conscious, knowing, unified, rational subject, poststructuralism theorizes subjectivity as a site of disunity and con-flict, central to the processes of political change and to preserving the status quo’ (ibidem). According to Weedon, ‘all forms of poststructuralism assume that meaning is constituted within language and is not guaranteed by the subject which speaks it’ (ibidem, p. 22). There can be no essential feminine or masculine qualities given for all times and reflected in language and the social relations which language structures. She adds: ‘The meanings of femi-ninity and masculinity vary from culture to culture and language to lan-guage’ (ibidem). Here, too, Weedon’s views on identity emphasize a sense of ambiguity, disunity and conflict that resonates well with today’s readers.As a historian and cultural theorist, Benedict Anderson (1983) fought against God-given, natural theories of nationalism. His well-known phrase, imagined communities, captured the fact that national identities are not the birthright of native speakers but are painstakingly constructed by the nation-state through census, maps, museums and, of course, schools, the film industry and the media. Nations imagine themselves to be limited (by national borders), sovereign (free under God) and united in brotherly love (deep, horizontal comradeship). Anderson writes: ‘Communities are to be distinguished, not by their falsity/genuineness, but by the style in which they are imagined’ (Anderson, 1983, p. 6). This style is avowedly grounded in history. By constantly rehearsing their history and remembering their heroes, nations ‘transform fatality into continuity, contingency into meaning’ (p. 11) and thereby build their own sense of identity. As Anderson memorably remarks: ‘It is the magic of nationalism to turn chance into des-tiny’ (p. 12). Anderson’s phrase ‘imagined community’ reminds readers today of the overwhelming power of nations to control the imagination of their citizens, both directly through political speeches and indirectly through mass forms of communication.DiscussionEach of the three theorists that Bonny Norton drew on fought against the dangers of conceptualizing the individual as ‘master of his/her destiny’, carv-ing his/her path to attain well-formulated goals in the future, secure in his/her membership in a clearly defined, God-given national community. All Af terword 197three show that in fact the real world is messy and contradictory: individuals are complicit in playing a game whose rules have been set by powerful institu-tions (Bourdieu); their identities are not unitary but conflictual as they are constituted by the language of others according to social forces not of their choosing (Weedon); the communities they belong to are not natural but social and political constructs that serve the interests of the powerful (Anderson). By fighting against a structuralist view of the world, these poststructuralist thinkers opened the possibility of resistance born out of an awareness of and attention to complexity, change and paradox.Norton’s poststructuralist thought as inspired by Bourdieu, Weedon and Anderson has been further elaborated by other researchers in the field (see Introduction), but it is now read within global geopolitical conditions that give it new meanings. For example, while the notion of ‘investment’ is now inseparable from the much quoted ‘participation and (re)construction of selves’ memorably documented by Pavlenko and Lantolf (2000), it is also inseparable from some of the dramatic accounts of the damage done by unbridled globalization (Heller, 2003, 2010; Kramsch & Boner, 2010). Sim- ilarly, the sharing of narratives of the self associated with the work of Pavlenko (2001, 2002), Block (2006) and others (including Norton & Early, 2011) is now also linked to the narratives of global injustices and ideological contradictions documented in Blommaert (2005) and Holborow (2012).In yet another example, Norton’s work has inspired language educators to use electronic chatrooms, blogs and Skype technology to have students communicate with one another outside the classroom (Lam, 2006; Malinowski & Kramsch, in press; Mendelson, 2010) and telecollaboration with native speakers in distant countries (Kramsch & Thorne, 2002; Ware & Kramsch, 2005). Her narrative approach has boosted the efforts of literacy educators who are using digital storytelling to develop cosmopolitan identi-ties among disadvantaged youth around the globe (Hull et al., in press). But these efforts are now inseparable from the critical work of sociolinguists on the neocolonial effects of tourism discourse (Thurlow & Jaworski, 2010) and its insidious influence on language textbooks (Vinall, 2012). And they cannot be dissociated from MIT psychoanalyst Sherry Turkle’s devastating indict-ment of the internet in Alone Together (2011). In all these cases, the dream of renewed identities is clouded by the ruthless realities of economic and cul-tural globalization.In the same way as the global economic, cultural and political upheavals of the last 10 years have affected the way we interpret events, so has the teaching of English come to be viewed through a much more ambivalent lens than even 10 years ago. The growth of critical, postmodern sociolinguistics (Block et al., 2012; Blommaert, 2005, 2010; Heller & Duchêne, 2011; Thurlow & Jaworski, 2010; Ward, 2011) is prompting us to cast a more political light on the indi-vidual cases documented by Norton in the Nineties, and continues to impact Norton’s more recent work (e.g. Norton & Williams, 2012).198 Ident ity and Language LearningConclusionMuch has happened in the last ten years that has shaped today’s readers of Identity and Language Learning. In the 90s, we lived in a world where the fall of the Berlin Wall, the demise of Soviet communism, the end of apartheid in South Africa indeed ushered in the promise of freedom, demo- cracy and equal opportunity around the world. Knowledge of English has been a strong element in the new identities that were part of that promise. But since 2001, we also live in a world where a deregulated fast capitalism has exacerbated global inequalities, created havoc with the financial markets and increased the global competition for goods, status and power. English has become the language of the new global elites. Rather than just a communicative skill, English has become for many also a status symbol.More importantly, for some, English has become the language not of dreams come true but of dreams shattered. Words lose much of their truth value when language becomes commodified by the marketing industry, and the right to speak becomes trivialized by the overuse of statistics and opinion polls. The political promise of the poststructuralist perspective, that was to open up possibilities by characterizing social identities as ‘multiple and con-tradictory’ (Norton Peirce, 1995, p. 15) and a learner’s investment in the target language as ‘complex, contradictory and in a state of flux’ (Norton, 2000, p. 11), risks itself becoming commodified as one more structural and controlling process that benefits those who ‘made it’ and who may no longer wish to have multiple and contradictory identities, but rather a unitary, stable and predictable one.Identity will continue to be an important topic of research in SLA, but the notion of identity as defined in Identity and Language Learning is in danger of itself being redefined in structuralist terms by those who have the eco-nomic, cultural and symbolic capital to do so. Identity might then cease to be a matter of investment and imagination and might become once again a matter of birth privilege and social class. It will then be good to remember the South African origins of Bonny Norton’s influential work and the revo-lutionary ideals it embodies.ReferencesAnderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Block, D. (2003). The Social Turn in Second Language Acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Block, D. (2006). Multilingual Identities in a Global City: London Stories. London: Palgrave.Block, D. (in preparation). Class in Applied Linguistics: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge.Block, D., Gray, J. & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Af terword 199Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard.Cameron, D. (2006). Styling the worker: Gender and the commodification of language in the globalized service economy. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (3), 323–347.Heller, M. (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (4), 473–492.Heller, M. (2010). Language as resource in the globalized new economy. In N. Coupland, (ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 349–365.Heller, M. & Duchêne, A. (2011). Pride and profit: Changing discourse of language, capital and nation-state. In A. Duchêne & M. Heller (eds), Language in Late Capitalism. Pride and Profit. London: Routledge, 1–21.Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberal keywords and the contradictions of an ideology. In D. Block, J. Gray, & M. Holborow (eds.). Neoliberalism and Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, 33–55.Hull, G., Stornaiuolo, A. & Sterponi, L. (in press). Imagined readers and hospitable texts: Global youths connect online. In D. Alvermann, N. Unrau & R. Ruddell (eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th edn.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Kanno, Y. & Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2 (4) (special issue), 241–249.Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kramsch, C. (2009). The Multilingual Subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kramsch, C. (2010). Afterword. In D. Nunan & J. Choi (eds), Language and Culture. Reflective Narratives and the Emergence of Identity. London: Routledge, 223–224.Kramsch, C. (2012). Subjectivity. In C. Chapelle (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Kramsch, C. & Boner, E. (2010). Shadows of discourse: Intercultural communication in global contexts. In N. Coupland (ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 495–519.Kramsch, C. & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (eds.), Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge, 83–100.Lam, E.W.S. (2006). Re-envisioning language, literacy and the immigrant subject in new mediascapes. Pedagogies: An International Journal 1 (2), 171–195.Lantolf, J. (ed.) (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Lantolf, J.P. & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Malinowski, D. & Kramsch, C. (in press). The ambiguous world of heteroglossic com-puter-mediated language learning. In A. Blackledge & A. Creese (eds), Heteroglossia as Practice and Pedagogy.Mendelson, A. (2010). Using online forums to scaffold oral participation in foreign lan-guage instruction. L2 Journal 2, 23–44.Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.Norton, B. & Early, M. (2011). Researcher identity, narrative inquiry, and language teach-ing research. TESOL Quarterly 45 (3) 415–439.Norton, B. & Williams, C.J. (2012). Digital identities, student investments, and eGranary as a placed resource. Language and Education 26 (4), 315–329.200 Ident ity and Language LearningNorton Peirce, B. (1987). ESL under apartheid: Language in transition. Paper presented at the 21st Annual TESOL convention, Miami Beach, FL.Norton Peirce, B. (1989). Toward a pedagogy of possibility in the teaching of English internationally: People’s English in South Africa. TESOL Quarterly 23 (3), 401–420.Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29 (1), 9–31.Pavlenko, A. (2001). ‘In the world of the tradition, I was unimagined’: Negotiation of identities in cross-cultural autobiographies. International Journal of Bilingualism 5 (3), 317–344.Pavlenko, A. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to the study of social factors in second language learning and use. In V. Cook (ed.), Portraits of the L2 User. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 275–302.Pavlenko, A. & Lantolf, J. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 155–178.Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–114.Thompson, J.B. (1991). Editor’s Introduction. In P. Bourdieu (ed.), Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–31.Thurlow, C. & Jaworski, A. (2010). Tourism Discourse. Language and Global Mobility. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together. Why We Expect More from Technology and Less of Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Vinall, K. (2012). Un Legado Historico? Symbolic competence and the construction of mul-tiple histories. L2 Journal 4, 102–123.Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Ward, S. (2011). Neoliberalism and the Global Restructuring of Knowledge and Education. London: Routledge.Ware, P. & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance. Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal 89 (2), 190–205.Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Af terword 201202ReferencesActon, W. and de Felix, J.W. (1986) Acculturation and mind. In J.M. Valdes (ed.) Culture Bound: Bridging the Culture Gap in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Anderson, G. (1989) Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59 (3), 249–70.Angelil-Carter, S. (1997) Second language acquisition of spoken and written English: Acquiring the skeptron. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (2), 263–87.Anzaldúa, G. (1990) How to tame a wild tongue. In R. Ferguson, M. Gever, T. Minh-ha and C. West (eds) Out There: Marginalization in Contemporary Cultures (pp. 203–11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Auerbach, E.R. (1989) Toward a social–contextual approach to family literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 59, 165–81.Auerbach, E.R. (1997) Family literacy. In V. Edwards and D. Corson (eds) Literacy. Vol. 2, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Bailey, K.M. (1980) An introspective analysis of an individual’s language learning experi-ence. In R. Scarcella and S. Krashen (eds) Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Bailey, K.M. (1983) Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H.D. Seliger and M.H. Long (eds) Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Barton, D. and Hamilton, M. (1998) Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London: Routledge.Bell, J. (1991) Becoming Aware of Literacy. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.Benesch, S. (1996) Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 723–38.Beretta, A. and Crookes, G. (1993) Cognitive and social determinants of discovery in SLA. Applied Linguistics, 14: 250–75.Bourdieu, P. (1977) The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16 (6), 645–68.Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. London/Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Bourne, J. (1988) ‘Natural acquisition’ and a ‘masked pedagogy’. Applied Linguistics, 9 (1), 83–99.Boyd, M. (1992) Immigrant women: Language, socio–economic inequalities, and policy issues. In B. Burnaby and A. Cumming (eds) Socio–Political Aspects of ESL in Canada. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Breen, M. and Candlin, C. (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in lan-guage teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 89–112.Bremer, K., Broeder, P., Roberts, C., Simonot, M. and Vasseur, M.-T. (1993) Ways of achieving understanding. In C. Perdue (ed.) Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, vol. II: The Results (pp. 153–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Bremer, K., Roberts, C., Vasseur, M.-T., Simonot, M. and Broeder, P. (1996) Achieving Understanding: Discourse in Intercultural Encounters. London: Longman.Briskin, L. and Coulter, R. C. (1992) Feminist pedagogy: Challenging the normative. Canadian Journal of Education, 17 (3), 247–63.Britzman, D. (October 1990) Could this be your story? Guilty readings and other ethno-graphic dramas. Paper presented at the Bergamo Conference, Dayton, Ohio.Brodkey, L. (1987) Writing critical ethnographic narratives. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 67–76.Brown, C. (1984) Two Windows on the classroom world: Diary studies and participant observation differences. In P. Larson, E. Judd, and D. Messerschmitt (eds) On TESOL’84. Washington, DC: TESOL.Brown, H.D. (1994) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Burnaby, B. (1997) Second language teaching approaches for adults. In G.R. Tucker and D. Corson (eds) Second Language Education. Vol. 4, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Burnaby, B., Harper, H. and Norton Peirce, B. (1992) English in the workplace: An employer’s concerns. In B. Burnaby and A. Cumming (eds) Socio–Political Aspects of ESL Education in Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.Burnaby, B. and Sun, Y. (1989) Chinese teachers’ views of western language teaching: Context informs paradigms. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (2), 219–36.Butler, J. and Scott, J.W. (eds) (1992) Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B. and Richardson, K. (1992) Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method. London: Routledge.Canagarajah, A.S. (1993) Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (4), 601–26.Canale, M. and Swain, M. (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.Canale, M. (1983) On some dimensions of language proficiency. In J. Oller (ed.) Issues in Language Testing Research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Candlin, C. (1989) Language, culture, and curriculum. In C. Candlin and T.F. McNamara (eds) Language, Learning and Community (pp. 1–24). Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Cazden, C., Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. and Schumann, J. (1975) Second Language Acquisition Sequences in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Research report, Cambridge, MA.Cherryholmes, C. (1988) Power and Criticism: Poststructuralist Investigations in Education. New York: Teachers College Press.Clark, R. and Ivanic, R. (1997) The Politics of Writing. London: Routledge.Clarke, M. (1976) Second language acquisition as a clash of consciousness. Language Learning, 26, 377–90.Clyne, M. (1991) Community Languages: The Australian Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Connell, R.W., Ashendon, D.J., Kessler, S. and Dowsett, G.W. (1982) Making the Difference. Schools, Families, and Social Division. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.Cooke, D. (1986) Learning the language of your students. TESL Talk, 16 (1), 5–13.Corson, D. (1993) Language, minority education and gender. Cleveland: Multilingual Matters.Crookes, G. and Schmidt, R. (1991) Motivation: Reopening the Research Agenda. Language Learning, 41 (4), 469–512.References 203Cumming, A. and Gill, J. (1991) Learning ESL Literacy among Indo-Canadian women. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 4 (3), 181–98.Cumming, A. and Gill, J. (1992) Motivation or accessibility? Factors permitting Indo-Canadian women to pursue ESL literacy instruction. In B. Burnaby and A. Cumming (eds) Socio–Political Aspects of ESL Education in Canada. Toronto: OISE Press.Cummins, J. (1996) Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society. Ontario, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.Cummins, J. and Corson, D. (eds) (1997) Bilingual Education. Vol. 5, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Dörnyei, Z. (1994) Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 273–84.Dörnyei, Z. (1997) Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: group dynamics and motivation. Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 482–93.Duff, P. and Uchida, Y. (1997) The negotiation of teachers’ sociocultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 451–86.Edge, J. and Norton, B. (1999) Culture, power, and possibility in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual TESOL convention, New York, NY, March 1999.Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Ellis, R. (1985) Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Oxford University Press.Ellis, R. (1997) Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Faltis, C. (1997) Case study methods in researching language and education. In N. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, C. Gordon (trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Freedman, R. (1997) Researching gender in language use. In N. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 47–56). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.Freire, P. (1985) The Politics of Education. South Hadley, MA: Bergin-Garvey.Gardiner, M. (1987) Liberating language: People’s English for the future. In People’s Education: A Collection of Articles (pp. 56–62). Bellville, South Africa: University of the Western Cape, Centre for Adult and Continuing Education.Gardner, R.C. (1985) Social Psychology and Second Language Learning. The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Gardner, R.C. (1989) Attitudes and Motivation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1988 (9), 135–48.Gardner, R.C. and Lambert, W. E. (1972) Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Gardner, R.C. and MacIntyre, P. D. (1992) A student’s contributions to second-language learning. Part I: Cognitive Variables. Language Teaching, 25 (4), 211–20.Gardner, R.C. and MacIntyre, P. D. (1993) A student’s contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective Variables. Language Teaching, 26 (1), 1–11.Gee, J.P. (1990) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.Giles, H. and Coupland, N. (1991) Language: Contexts and Consequences. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Giroux, H.A. (1988) Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Giroux, H. (1992) Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York: Routledge.204 Ident ity and Language LearningGoldstein, T. (1996) Two Languages at Work: Bilingual Life on the Production Floor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Goldstein, T. (1997) Language research methods and critical pedagogy. In N. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds) (1997) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Gregg, K. (1993) Taking explanation seriously; or let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14, 276–93.Hall, J.K. (1993) The Role of Oral Practices in the Accomplishment of Our Everyday Lives: The Sociocultural Dimension of Interaction with Implications for the Learning of Another Language. Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 145–66.Hall, J.K. (1995) (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16 (2), 206–32.Hall, J.K. (1997) A Consideration of SLA as a Theory of Practice: A Response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 81 (3), 301–6.Hansen, J.G. and Liu, J. (1997) Social identity and language: Theoretical and methodologi-cal issues. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 567–76.Harper, H., Norton Peirce, B. and Burnaby, B. (1996) English-in-the-workplace for gar-ment workers: A feminist project? Gender and Education, 8 (1), 5–19.Haug, F. (ed.) (1987) Female Sexualization: a Collective Work of Memory, Erica Carter (trans.). London: Verso.Heath, S.B. (1983) Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Heller, M. (1987) The role of language in the formation of ethnic identity. In J. Phinney and M. Rotheram (eds) Children’s Ethnic Socialization (pp. 180–200). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Heller, M. (1992) The politics of codeswitching and language choice. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13 (1 & 2), 123–42.Heller, M. (1999) Linguistic Minorities and Modernity: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography. London: Longman.Heller, M. and Barker, G. (1988) Conversational strategies and contexts for talk: Learning activities for Franco-Ontarian minority schools. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 19 (1), 20–46.Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C. and Walkerdine, V. (1984) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation, and Subjectivity. London and New York: Methuen.Hooks, b. (1990) Talking Back. In R. Ferguson, M. Gever, T. Minh-ha and C. West (eds) Out There: Marginalization in Contemporary Cultures. Cambridge, Mass, MA: MIT Press.Hornberger, N. and Corson, D. (eds) (1997) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Hymes, D. (1979) On communicative competence. In C.J. Brumfit and K. Johnson (eds) The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching (pp. 5–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Janks, H. (1997) Teaching language and power. In R. Wodak and D. Corson (eds) Language Policy and Political Issues in Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 241–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Johnson, D. (1992) Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning. New York: Longman.Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. and Slade, D. (1989) Minority Languages and Dominant Culture: Issues of Education, Assessment and Social Equity. London: Falmer.Kanno, Y. (1996) There’s no Place Like Home: Japanese Returnees’ Identities in Transition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.Klein, W. (1986) Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Kramsch, C. (1993) Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.References 205Krashen, S. (1981) Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Krashen, S. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Kress, G. (1989) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Kubota, R. (1999) Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (1), 9–35.Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and Row.Lambert, W.E. (1975) Culture and language as factors in learning and education. In A. Wolfgang (ed.) Education of Immigrant Students. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Lantolf, J. (1996) SLA Theory Building: ‘Letting All the Flowers Bloom!’ Language Learning, 46 (4), 713–49.Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. (1991) An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman.Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Legutke, M., and Thomas, H. (1991) Process and Experience in the Language Classroom. London: Longman.Lemke, J. (1995) Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.Leung, C., Harris, R. and Rampton, B. (1997) The idealised native speaker, reified ethnici-ties and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 543–60.Lewis, M. and Simon, R. (1986) A discourse not intended for her: Learning and teaching within patriarchy. Harvard Educational Review, 56 (4), 457–72.Lin, A. (1996) Bilingualism or linguistic segregation? Symbolic domination, resistance and code-switching in Hong Kong schools. Linguistics and Education, 8 (1), 49–84.Long, M. (1993) Assessment strategies for second language acquisition theories. Applied Linguistics, 14, 225–49.Lorde, A. (1990) Age, race, class, and sex: Women redefining difference. In R. Ferguson, M. Gever, T. Minh-ha and C. West (eds) Out There: Marginalization in Contemporary Cultures (pp. 281–7). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Luke, A. (1988) Literacy, Textbooks and Ideology, Basingstoke: Falmer Press.Luke, A. (2002) Producing new Asian masculinities. In C. Barron, N. Bruce & D. Nunan (eds), Knowledge and Discourse: Towards an Ecology of Language. Harlow, UK: Longman Pearson Education, 78–92.Luke, C. and Gore, J. (eds) (1992) Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.McKay, S.L. and Wong, S.C. (1996) Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant stu-dents. Harvard Educational Review, 3, 577–608.McNamara, T. (1997) What do we mean by social identity? Competing frameworks, competing discourses. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 561–6.Martin-Jones, M. and Heller, M. (1996) Introduction to the special issues on Education in multilingual settings: Discourse, identities, and power. Linguistics and Education, 8, 3–16.Martin-Jones, M. (1997) Bilingual classroom discourse: Changing research approaches and diversification of research sites. In N. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds) (1997) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.May, S. (1997) Critical ethnography. In N. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds) (1997) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.206 Ident ity and Language LearningMiller, J. (1999) Speaking English and Social Identity: Migrant Students in Queensland High Schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia.Mitchell, C. and Weiler, K. (1991) Rewriting Literacy: Culture and the Discourse of the Other. Toronto: OISE Press.Morgan, B. (1997) Identity and intonation: Linking dynamic processes in the ESL class-room. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 431–50.Morgan, B. (1998) The ESL Classroom: Teaching, Critical Practice, and Community Development. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Morris, M. and Patton, P. (eds) (1979) Michel Foucault: Power, Truth, Strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications.Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H.H. and Todesco, A. (1978) The Good Language Learner. A Research in Education Series No. 7. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Ndebele, N. (1987) The English language and social change in South Africa. The English Academy Review, 4, 1–16.New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.Ng, R. (1981) Constituting ethnic phenomenon: An account from the perspective of immigrant women. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 13, 97–108.Ng, R. (1987) Immigrant women in Canada: A socially constructed category. Resources for Feminist Research/Documentation sur la Recherche Féministe, 16, 13–15.Norton Peirce, B. (1989) Toward a pedagogy of possibility in the teaching of English internationally: People’s English in South Africa. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (3), 401–20.Norton Peirce, B. (1993) Language Learning, Social Identity, and Immigrant Women. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto.Norton Peirce, B. (1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (1), 9–31.Norton, B. (1997a) Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 409–429.Norton, B. (1997b) Critical discourse research. In N. Hornberger and D. Corson (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Vol. 8, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Norton, B. (2001) Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language class-room. In M. Breen (ed.) Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New directions in research. Harlow, UK: Longman Pearson Education, 159 –171.Norton Peirce, B., Harper, H. and Burnaby, B. (1993) Workplace ESL at Levi Strauss: ‘Dropouts’ speak out. TESL Canada Journal, 10 (2), 9–30.Norton Peirce, B. and Stein, P. (1995) Why the ‘monkeys passage’ bombed: Tests, genres, and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 65 (1), 50–65.Norton Peirce, B., Swain, M. and Hart, D. (1993) Self-assessment, French immersion, and locus of control. Applied Linguistics, 14 (1), 25–42.Norton, B. and Toohey, K. (1999) Reconceptualizing ‘the good language learner’: SLA at the turn of the century. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.Ochs, E. (1992) Indexing gender. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds) Rethinking Context (pp. 335–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Oxford, R. and Shearin, J. (1994) Language Learning Motivation: Expanding the Theoretical Framework. Modern Language Journal, 78 (1), 12–28.Pennycook, A. (1989) The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23 (4), 589–618.Pennycook, A. (1994) The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.References 207Pennycook, A. (1998) English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Perdue, C. (ed.) (1984) Second Language Acquisition by Adult Immigrants. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Perdue, C. (ed.) (1993a) Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Vol. I, Field Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Perdue, C. (ed.) (1993b) Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives. Vol. II, The Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Peyton, J.K. and Reed, L. (1990) Dialogue Journal Writing with Nonnative English Speakers: A Handbook for Teachers. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.Rampton, B. (1995) Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents. London: Longman.Rist, R. (1980) Blitzkrieg ethnography: On the transformation of a method into a move-ment. Educational Researcher, 9 (2), 8–10.Roberts, C., Davies, E. and Jupp, T. (1992) Language and Discrimination: A Study of Communication in Multi-ethnic Workplaces. London: Longman.Rockhill, K. (1987a) Literacy as threat/desire: Longing to be SOMEBODY. In J. Gaskill and A. McLaren (eds) Women and Education: A Canadian Perspective (pp. 315–31). Calgary, Alberta: Detselig Enterprises Ltd.Rockhill, K. (1987b) Gender, language and the politics of literacy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (2), 153–67.Rossiter, A.B. (1986) From Private to Public: A Feminist Exploration of Early Mothering. Toronto: Women’s Press.Rubin, J. (1975) What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.Sarangi, S. and Baynham, M. (1996) Discursive construction of educational identities: affirmative readings. Language and Education, 10 (2 & 3), 77–81.Saussure, F. de. (1966) Course in General Linguistics. W. Baskin (trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Savignon, S. (1991) Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (2), 261–78.Schecter, S. and Bayley, R. (1997) Language socialization practices and cultural identity: Case studies of Mexican descent families in California and Texas. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 513–42.Schenke, A. (1991) The ‘will to reciprocity’ and the work of memory: Fictioning speaking out of silence in ESL and feminist pedagogy. Resources for Feminist Research/Documentation sur la Recherche Féministe, 20 (3/4), 47–55.Schenke, A. (1996) Not just a ‘social issue’: teaching feminist in ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30 (1), 155–9.Schumann, F. (1980) Diary of a language learner: a further analysis. In R. Scarcella and S. Krashen (eds) Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Schumann, J. (1976a) Social distance as a factor in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26 (1), 135–43.Schumann, J. (1976b) Second language acquisition: The pidginization hypothesis. Language Learning, 26 (2), 391–408.Schumann, J. (1978a) The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Schumann, J. (1978b) The acculturation model for second-language acquisition. In R.C. Gringas (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Schumann, J. (1986) Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisi-tion. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7 (5), 379–92.Schumann, J. (1993) Some problems with falsification: An illustration from SLA research. Applied Linguistics, 14, 295–306.208 Ident ity and Language LearningSchumann, J.H. and Schumann, F. (1977) Diary of a language learner: An introspective study of second language learning. In H.D. Brown, C. Yorio, and R. Crymes (eds) On TESOL ‘77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends and Practice. Washington, DC: TESOL.Scovel, T. (1978) The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. Language Learning, 28, 129–42.Simon, R. (1987) Empowerment as a pedagogy of possibility. Language Arts, 64, 370–83.Simon, R. (1992) Teaching Against the Grain: Texts for a Pedagogy of Possibility. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Simon, R.I. and Dippo, D. (1986) On critical ethnographic work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 17, 198–201.Simon, R.I., Dippo, D. and Schenke, A. (1991) Learning Work: a Critical Pedagogy of Work Education. Toronto: OISE Press.Smith, D.E. (1987a) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Smith, D.E. (1987b) Institutional Ethnography: A Feminist Method. Resources for Feminist Research/Documentation sur la Recherche Féministe, 15, 6–13.Smith, D.E. (1987c) An analysis of ideological structures and how women are excluded. In J.S. Gaskell and A.T. McLaren (eds) Women and Education: A Canadian Perspective. Calgary, Alberta: Detselig Enterprises Ltd.Smoke, T. (ed.) (1998) Adult ESL: Politics, Pedagogy, and Participation in Classroom and Community Programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Solsken, J. (1993) Literacy, Gender, and Work: in Families and in School. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Co.Spender, D. (1980) Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Spolsky, B. (1989) Conditions for Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Stein, P. (1998) Reconfiguring the past and the present: Performing literacy histories in a Johannesburg classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (3), 517–28.Stern, H.H. (1983) Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Tannen, D. (1990) You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.Terdiman, R. (1985) Discourse/Counter-Discourse: The Theory and Practice of Symbolic Resistance in Nineteenth-century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Ternar, Y. (1990) Ajax là-bas. In L. Hutcheon and M. Richmond (eds) Other Solitudes: Canadian Multicultural Fictions. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Thesen, L. (1997) Voices, discourse, and transition: In search of new categories in EAP. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (3), 487–512.Toohey, K. (1996) Learning English as a second language in kindergarten: A community of practice perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52 (4), 549–76.Toohey, K. (1998) ‘Breaking them up, taking them away’: ESL students in Grade 1. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (1), 61–84.Toohey, K. (2000) Learning English in Schools: Identity, Social Relations, and Classroom Practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Tucker, R. and Corson, D. (1997) Second Language Education. Vol. 2, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.van Daele, C. (1990) Making Words Count: The Experience and Meaning of the Diary in Women’s Lives. Unpublished Doctor of Education thesis. University of Toronto, Canada.References 209van Lier, L. (1994) Forks and hope: pursuing understanding in different ways. Applied Linguistics, 15 (3), 328–46.Wallerstein, N. (1983) Language and Culture in Conflict: Problem-Posing in the ESL Classroom. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Walsh, C.A. (1987) Language, meaning, and voice: Puerto Rican students’ struggle for a speaking consciousness, Language Arts, 64, 196–206.Walsh, C.A. (1991) Pedagogy and the Struggle for Voice: Issues of Language, Power, and Schooling for Puerto Ricans. Toronto: OISE Press.Watson Gegeo, K. (1988) Ethnography in ESL: defining the essentials. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (4), 575–92.Weedon, C. (1997) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Second Edition. London: Blackwell.Weiler, K. (1988) Women Teaching for Change: Gender, Class, and Power. New York: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.Weiler, K. (1991) Freire and a feminist pedagogy of difference. Harvard Education Review, 61 (4), 449–74.Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.West, C. (1992) A matter of life and death. October, 61 (summer), 20–3.Willis, P.E. (1977) Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London and New York: Longman.Wolcott, H.F. (1994) Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Wong Fillmore, L. (1991) When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 6, 323–46.Yee, M. (1993) Finding the way home through issues of gender, race and class. In H. Bannerji (ed.) Returning the Gaze: Essays on Racism, Feminism and Politics (pp. 3–44). Toronto: Sister Vision Press.Yu, L. (1990) The comprehensible output hypothesis and self-directed learning: A learn-er’s perspective. TESL Canada Journal, 8 (1), 9–26.Zamel, V. (1987) Recent research on writing pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 21 (4), 697–715.210 Ident ity and Language Learningacculturation model of SLA 150–151bilingualism 155data 152–153integration strategy of assimilation 154investment 157–158positive attitudes 154–155racism 155responsibility 156status 152, 154Acton, W. 77affective filter 156anxiety and self-confdence , 159–61context 100, 103motivation 156–159Alberto 150–152Anderson, G. 58, 59Angelil-Carter, S. 51anxiety 43locus of control 160oral skills 159, 160social constructs, 160, 162, 174stress 160see also self-confdenceAnzaldúa, G. 124Ashendon, D. J. 52Auerbach, E. R. 96 n2, 191 n4Bailey, K. M. 74 n4, 159Bakhtin, M. 53Barker, G. 109Barton, D. 74Bayley, R. 46Bell, J. 74 n4Benesch, S. 96 n2Beretta, A. 57 n10bilingualism 155workplace study 83–84Bourdieu, P. 47, 48, 50, 51, 106, 147, 150, 162, 165, 166, 167, 168Bourne, J. 55Boyd, M. 81Breen, M. 175Bremer, K. 76, 78, 107, 108, 110, 147, 189Briskin, L. 58, 60Britzman, D. 58, 70Brodkey, L. 58, 60Broeder, P. 76, 78Brown, C. 67, 74 n4Brown, H. D. 56 n2, 151Burnaby, B. 84, 96 n2, n3, 161, 170, 174, 176, 187Butler, J. 161Cameron, D. 60–61, 184Canadadiscrimination 93, 94, 95, 108, 134, 137immigration 80racism 114, 155, 186, 187see also immigrant women in CanadaCanagarajah, A. S. 188Canale, M. 55, 175Cancino, H. 150, 151Candlin, C. 175Cazden, C. 150, 152Cherryholmes, C. 161China 170, 174, 176Clark, R. 184Clarke, M. 77class 53, 139, 142identity 139–140, 142relations 129–130, 188Clyne, M. 76communicative competence 55–56, 150, 193communicative language teaching 170, 175–176using lived experiences 176–177Connell, R. W. 53, 59, 139, 142IndexNote: n refers to the notes.Cooke, D. 74 n4Cope, B. 188Corson, D. 56 n1, n6, n9Coulter, R. C. 58, 60Coupland, N. 45Crookes, G. 50, 57 n10cultural capital 50cultural identity 46, 56 n5cultural practices 134–137, 145, 173–174, 187, 189see also acculturation model of SLACumming, A. 82–83Cummins, J. 47, 49, 56 n1Davies, E. 96 n2de Felix, J. W. 77diary study 64–66, 67–71authority 184classroom-based social research 189meetings 184, 185as pedagogy of possibility 182–188personal experiences 183, 184, 187writer identities 184–185Dippo, D. 58, 59, 60discourses 54Dörnyei, Z. 50Dowsett, G. W. 53, 59, 139, 142Duff, P. 46Edge, J. 146educational research 58–60Edwards, D. 45Ellis, R. 44, 51, 151employment 66, 116, 186see also workplaceethnicityand gender 52, 73as product of opposition 52and social organization 81as social relations 52ethnography 59, 60, 62European Science Foundation Project 73, 77–79Evabiography 86–88diary study meetings 184home as refuge 98investment in English 98, 157–158workplace 98–99, 122–123, 184–185writing 69Faltis, C. 56 n6Fairclough, N. 53, 57 n9family structures 112–118respect 113, 114–115, 116Feliciabiography 93–95class identity 139, 142classroom resistance 170, 177, 188diary study meetings 185, 186identity as foreigner 139–141investment in English 139, 141, 158workplace 142–143, 185writing 69feminism 59–60, 183poststructuralism 161, 162, 164formal language learning 42–43adult immigrant views 86, 90, 171–174, 178communicative language teaching 170, 175–177cultural practices 173historical engagement 187investment of students 178–181language practice 172–173, 174, 180–181multiculturalism 181oral skills 159, 160teacher’s authority 181–182using lived experiences 176–177, 179, 182see also diary study; language teaching; natural language learningFoucault, M. 47, 55Frazer, E. 63–64, 184Freedman, R. 124Freire, P. 47Frohlich, M. 56 n3Gardiner, M. 175Gardner, R. C. 44, 50, 56 n2, 169 n2Gee, J. P. 53, 57 n9genderand employment 66, 186and ethnicity 52, 73and identity 121–122and language learning 65–66, 124–125, 187and language use 124, 147and power 147in the public world 52Giles, H. 46Gill, J. 82–83212 IndexGiroux, H. 47, 161, 181–182Goldstein, T. 56 n6, 83–84, 109, 118Gore, J. 58, 59Gregg, K. 57 n10Hall, J. K. 45, 56 n4Hamilton, M. 74Hansen, J. G. 45Harper, H. 84–87, 96 n3, 161, 187Harris, R. 46Hart, D. 102, 159Harvey, P. 63–64, 184Haug, F. 183Heller, M. 45, 46, 52, 56 n7, 57, n9, 109Henriques, J. 45Hollway, W. 45–48Hooks, B. 57, n8 65Hornberger, N. 56 n6Hymes, D. 55identitychanging over time 164–166class 139, 142concepts of 46, 161cultural 46, 56 n5and desires 48as foreigner 139–141gendered 121–122immigrant 87, 88, 122, 178, 179–180, 189–190and language 45–46and language learning 46and literacy 74as mother 126–127, 132–133, 136, 144nonunitary and contradictory 162–164and power 47–49, 85recognition 177–179, 187as site of struggle 164, 166social 46, 56 n5, 103, 122, 128social interactions 136and subject position 178–179writers 184–185see also ethnicityimmigrant language learnersCanadian studies 80–85class relations 130communication with native speakers 78, 80, 85, 189–90 (see also work-place)discrimination 78, 93, 94, 115European Science Foundation Project 73, 77–79identities 176–80, 189–90international context 76–77language and family 112–118, 126–127, 144–145as language brokers 116–117performance 102pronunciation 88as social researchers 189–190status 154USA 51, 79–80world view 96see also acculturation model of SLA; immigrant women in Canada; Ontario studyimmigrant women in Canada 80–81action research study 85bilingual workplace study 83–84discrimination 81, 91, 92immigrant language training pro-grammes 63, 74 n1Indo-Canadian study 82–83Levi Strauss study 84–85, 161Vancouver study 81–82views of Canada 87, 88, 139see also Ontario studyindividualexperience 59, 176–78, 187–188humanist conception 162nonunitary subject 162interlanguages 78International Metropolis Project 76investment 50–51in English 98, 111, 117, 125, 131, 137–138, 139, 141–142, 144, 157in formal language classes 178–179in identity 179target language speakers 107, 156Ivanic, R. 184Janks, H. 176Johnson, D. 77journal writing 176see also diary studyJupp, T. 96 n2Kalantzis, M. 188Kanno, Y. 45Katarinabiography 89–91class relations 130–131classroom resistance 177, 188, 191 n3diary study meetings 186Index 213Kalantzis, M. 188 (Continued )discrimination by 186–187identity as mother 126–127investment in English 127–128, 158workplace 128–129writing 69Kessler, S. 53, 59, 139, 142Klein, W. 77Kramsch, C. 56 n4Krashen, S. 44, 56, 56 n2, 100, 156Kress, G. 53, 54, 57 n9, 107Kubota, R. 181Lakoff, R. 124, 146–147Lambert, W. E. 50, 56 n2, 155, 169 n1languagecritical discourse 53, 54and identity 45–46poststructuralist theories 53, 54as social construct 167–168structuralist theories 53language teachingchallenges and possibilities 188classroom-based social research 189foreign language 170, 174, 176, 188using lived experiences 176–177, 182see also formal language learningLantolf, J. 46, 57 n10Larson-Freeman, D. 151Lave, J. 122, 166, 169legitimate discourse 48, 106, 147, 166, 167, 168Legutke, M. 170, 171Lemke, J. 57 n9Leung, C. 46Lewis, M. 57 n8Lin, A. 56 n4, 188literacyasserting identity 74as gendered practice 80and Hispanic immigrant women in USA 79as social practice 74, 80Liu, J. 49Long, M. 57 n10, 151Lorde, A. 73Luke, A. 57 n9, 190Luke, C. 58, 59MacIntyre, P. D. 44, 49, 169 n2McKay, S. L. 51, 118McNamara, T. 49Maibiography 88–89classroom experience 179diary study meetings 182–188gendered identity 121–122home life 115–118, 125investment in English 111, 117, 158as language broker 119–120racism 189, 187workplace 118, 129, 185writing 69Martin-Jones, M. 46, 57 n6Martinabiography 91–93cultural practices 131–138, 136–140identity as mother 131–136, 136investment in English 134–135, 158as language broker 135use of English 69workplace 135writing 69material resources 48, 49, 83, 109May, S. 57 n6migration 76–79Miller, J. 49Mitchell, C. 74Morgan, B. 46, 85, 96 n2, 103, 188Morris, M. 55mother tonguedevaluation of 118as family identity 119, 120, 137as symbol of solidarity 83motherhood 126, 133motivation 44, 50, 156–157multiculturalismcritical 179–180exoticizing of 179immigrant identities 182Naiman, N. 56 n3natural language learning 42–43authenticity of communication 147–148fuent speaker context 86, 90, 126, 149legitimate speakers 149meaning 149, 150natural use of language 149research 77stimulating environment 148, 149voluntarity 49see also formal language learningNdebele, N. 176214 IndexNew London Group 74Ng, R. 52, 65, 73, 82Norton Peirce, B. 48, 50, 51, 55, 56 n5, 57 n9, 84–87, 96 n3, 102, 159, 161, 175, 187Norton, B. 46, 56, 56 n3, 56 n5, 57 n6, 123, 146Ochs, E. 124Ontario study 63–64data organization 71–73, 75 n5diary study 64–66, 70–71, 182–188ESL course 62–66findings 174–176interviews 66–69, 71oral skills 70, 71questionnaires 64–68, 71relationships 70volunteers 65–68, 80 (see also Eva; Felicia; Katarina; Mai; Martina)writing 69, 70Oxford, R. 50Passeron, J. 50Patton, P. 55pedagogy 187–188Pennycook, A. 57 n9, 188Perdue, C. 73, 74, 78Peyton, J. K. 176pidginized speech 151, 152Potter, J. 45powercoercive and collaborative relations 49within the family 116and gender 149and identity 49–50, 85relations 59, 97, 103–104, 140, 152–153, 167–168, 189and resistance 55, 65in second language acquisition (SLA) 146–147Prospect 77racism 155–156, 187Rampton, B. 46, 56 n4, 63–64, 109, 184Reed, L. 176researchadvocacy 61bias 59–60central questions 60empowerment 61ethics 61historical context 59methodological framework 58–60relationship with subjects 62, 69see also Ontario studyrespectin the family 116, 127power relations and 150in society 132–133in the workplace 100–101, 104, 107, 111, 121, 185Richardson, K. 184rights 101, 109, 185Rist, R. 61Roberts, C. 76, 78, 96 n2, 189Rockhill, K. 53, 79–80, 101, 160Rosansky, E. 150Rossiter, A. B. 191 n5Rubin, J. 56 n3, 95Sarangi, S. 46Saussure, F. de 53Savignon, S. 146, 175, 176Schecter, S. 46Schenke, A. 58, 60, 180, 187Schmidt, R. 50Schumann, F. 75 n4Schumann, J. 43, 51, 56 n2, 57 n10, 75 n4, 151–153Scott, J. W. 161Scovel, T. 44second language acquisition (SLA)affective filter 100, 132, 147, 156–161as betrayal of community 76cultural practices 173–174as emancipation 85as gendered activity 80, 80, 84‘good language learners’ 43, 49, 56 n3identities of learners 176–180learner and context 44–46literacy skills 176–177 (see also diary study)locus of control 159–160oral skills 159, 160power 146–147research 77soap operas 133–134as social practice 168–169, 174see also acculturation model of SLA; formal language learning; natural language learningself-confidence 44class relations 130Index 215self-confidence 44 (Continued )power relations 154, 163and social context 68, 148, 156at work 101, 104, 107, 110, 117, 187see also anxietyShearin, J. 50Simon, R. I. 57 n8, n9, 58, 59, 60, 161, 183, 187Simonot, M. 76, 78, 189SLA see second language acquisitionSlade, D. 188Smith, D. E. 57 n8, 58, 59Smoke, T. 77social identity 46, 56 n5social interactionsidentity and 141legitimate peripheral participation 122, 123power relations 150, 154, 195social research, classroom-based 189–190social structuresand human agency 59and power relations 59, 156Solsken, J. 74South Africa 51, 175, 187Spender, D. 57 n8Spolsky, B. 44, 147, 151, 159Stein, P. 57 n9, 176, 187–188Stern, H. H. 56 n3subjectivity 161, 165, 168, 176–180Sun, Y. 170, 174, 176Swain, M. 55, 102, 159, 175symbolic resources 49, 56–7 n7, 96 105, 110Tajfel, H. 45Tannen, D. 124, 146, 147teachersauthority 181–182, 184challenges and possibilities 188, 191teaching and pedagogy 170, 172, 182–183see also language teachingTerdiman, R. 54–55Ternar, Y. 41TESOL Quarterly 46Thesen, L. 46, 56 n4Thomas, H. 170, 171Todesco, A. 56 n3Toohey, K. 56 n3, n4, 103, 122Tucker, R. 56 n1Uchida, Y. 46understanding 79, 82Urwin, C. 49–48USA: immigrant language learners 60, 76–77van Daele, C. 74 n3van Lier, L. 45, 57 n10Vasseur, M.-T. 78Venn, C. 49–48Walkerdine, V. 49–48Wallerstein, N. 96 n2Walsh, C. A. 59, 103, 146Weedon, C. 48, 164Weiler, K. 59, 74, 85, 183Wenger, E. 123, 168West, C. 48Willis, P. E. 58, 62, 103Wodak, R. 57 n9Wolcott, H. F. 62, 71womenidentity 86literacy 79–80submissiveness 65writing 67–68see also immigrant women in CanadaWong Fillmore, L. 114Wong, S. C. 51, 114workplacecultural practices 134–135, 145exclusion from anglophones 99–102exploitation 101, 110gaining access to anglophones 102–107humour 109language use 93, 113, 124marginalization 103, 108, 122, 134, 138, 148power relations 102–103privileges of access to anglophones 107–109as refuge 98respect 102–103, 104, 107, 114–115, 123solidarity 83, 109, 120–121writingdiaries 67, 70social context 68writer identities 184–185Yee, M. 97Yu, L. 67Zamel, V. 68216 Index
Book
eng
Reviewed
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
Multilingual Matters
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Faculty
Identity and Language Learning : Extending the Conversation
Text