Education, Faculty of
Kinesiology, School of
DSpace
University of British Columbia. School of Kinesiology
UBC BodyWorks
University of British Columbia. Campus and Community Planning
Gill, Ria
Poblete, Grace
Pohang, Monika
Wan, Ashley
Wong, Carson
BodyWorks, which is the School of Kinesiology’s outreach program at UBC, currently offers two weekly exercise classes for older adults, with one of them being the Changing Aging program. This study aimed to provide specific recommendations for the BodyWorks staff to assist them in guiding their next steps with the expansion of the Changing Aging program within more community centers across the Greater Vancouver Area (GVA). Throughout this study, key success factors and challenges that past and present Changing Aging program members have experienced were taken into consideration. In addition, this study also looked to understand the aspects that would attract future participants to the program. After identifying the target population, which included those who would be eligible to participate in the Changing Aging program along with those who have or who are currently participating in that program, in-person and online recruitment began. This study included a mixed-methods design and questions were split into two categories, one for past and present Changing Aging participants and the other for those who have never participated in the program. Once the data collection period came to an end, a total of 58 responses were recorded. To analyze the quantitative responses, descriptive statistics were used, whereas descriptive qualitative statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the qualitative survey responses. The survey responses highlighted several key findings, such as common modes of transportation, class day and timing preferences, motivators for participating in exercise classes, important qualities in an exercise leader, and specific facility features. Based on the results, the recommendations for BodyWorks to consider when expanding the Changing Aging program into other community centers revolve around accessibility, perceptions and interests in exercise, and facility and program resources. In terms of accessibility, BodyWorks should implement the Changing Aging program into community centers that are closer to residential neighborhoods as well as look into ways they can decrease the costs that are associated with attending the program. Regarding perceptions and interests in exercise, BodyWorks staff should be equipped with sufficient knowledge of the importance of certain exercises and the muscle groups that are being targeted to better inform participants of the benefits of each movement. Furthermore, in terms of facility and program resources, BodyWorks instructors should provide clear and loud instructions to participants, wear name tags, and possibly use microphones to ensure all instructions are being heard. It is also recommended that the BodyWorks instructors are mindful of the amount of breaks they are offering for participants, with more breaks being more optimal. Unfortunately, due to the limited resources and time frame of this study, the population that was surveyed did not include a diverse sample size. Therefore, future research could aim to identify how the perceptions of those from different ethnic, socioeconomic, and cultural groups differ from those of the current study participants. With the GVA being very culturally diverse, the perspectives of individuals from these different backgrounds must be considered when looking at implementing programs in their community centers. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Does BodyWork?: Assessment of Opportunities to Expand the Changing Aging ProgramGroup #8Ria GillGrace PobleteMonika PohangAshley WanCarson WongBodyWorksKIN 464: Health Promotion and Physical ActivityDr. Andrea Bundonandrea.bundon@ubc.caApril 12, 20242DisclaimerDisclaimer: UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to sharethe findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions, and recommendations withthe UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student research project and isnot an official document of UBC. Furthermore, readers should bear in mind that these reportsmay not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the researchpersons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Sustainability Program representative about thecurrent status of the subject matter of a report.3Executive summaryBodyWorks, which is the School of Kinesiology’s outreach program at UBC, currentlyoffers two weekly exercise classes for older adults, with one of them being the Changing Agingprogram. This study aimed to provide specific recommendations for the BodyWorks staff toassist them in guiding their next steps with the expansion of the Changing Aging program withinmore community centers across the Greater Vancouver Area (GVA). Throughout this study, keysuccess factors and challenges that past and present Changing Aging program members haveexperienced were taken into consideration. In addition, this study also looked to understand theaspects that would attract future participants to the program.After identifying the target population, which included those who would be eligible toparticipate in the Changing Aging program along with those who have or who are currentlyparticipating in that program, in-person and online recruitment began. This study included amixed-methods design and questions were split into two categories, one for past and presentChanging Aging participants and the other for those who have never participated in the program.Once the data collection period came to an end, a total of 58 responses were recorded. Toanalyze the quantitative responses, descriptive statistics were used, whereasdescriptive qualitative statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze the qualitative surveyresponses. The survey responses highlighted several key findings, such as common modes oftransportation, class day and timing preferences, motivators for participating in exercise classes,important qualities in an exercise leader, and specific facility features.Based on the results, the recommendations for BodyWorks to consider when expandingthe Changing Aging program into other community centers revolve around accessibility,perceptions and interests in exercise, and facility and program resources. In terms ofaccessibility, BodyWorks should implement the Changing Aging program into communitycenters that are closer to residential neighborhoods as well as look into ways they can decreasethe costs that are associated with attending the program. Regarding perceptions and interests inexercise, BodyWorks staff should be equipped with sufficient knowledge of the importance ofcertain exercises and the muscle groups that are being targeted to better inform participants of thebenefits of each movement. Furthermore, in terms of facility and program resources, BodyWorksinstructors should provide clear and loud instructions to participants, wear name tags, andpossibly use microphones to ensure all instructions are being heard. It is also recommended thatthe BodyWorks instructors are mindful of the amount of breaks they are offering for participants,with more breaks being more optimal.Unfortunately, due to the limited resources and time frame of this study, the populationthat was surveyed did not include a diverse sample size. Therefore, future research could aim toidentify how the perceptions of those from different ethnic, socioeconomic, and cultural groupsdiffer from those of the current study participants. With the GVA being very culturally diverse,the perspectives of individuals from these different backgrounds must be considered whenlooking at implementing programs in their community centers.4IntroductionAging is a natural, gradual, and continuous process of change throughout one’s lifespan(Brown et al., 2017; Martin & Schoeni, 2014; Tosato, 2007). Moreover, older adults are facedwith an elevated risk of developing chronic diseases such as arthritis, dementia, and type twodiabetes (Marešová et al., 2019). The Government of Canada recognizes those who are over theage of 65 as older adults (Government of Canada, 2019). In a study of an elderly Braziliancohort, Filho et al. (2018) discovered that depression was more prevalent with age, suggestingthat older adults may encounter various age-related stressors that may contribute topsychological distress. These results altogether have significant implications for public healthconcerns, which highlight the need to promote healthy aging for this vulnerable population.Regular physical activity has been shown to provide both mental and physical benefitsfor aging adults (Maciel et al., 2013). As described by the Government of Canada (2019), adultswho are over the age of 65 should be engaging in at least two and a half hours of moderate tovigorous-intensity aerobic activity every week. In addition, it is also recommended that olderadults include muscle and bone-strengthening exercises at least twice a week, which can bespread out into sessions of 10 minutes or more (Government of Canada, 2019). Moreover,strength training has been shown to contribute to delayed onset of diseases such as osteoporosisand sarcopenia (Seguin & Nelson, 2003; Taylor et al., 2004). Researchers have found that olderadults who engage in regular physical activity have higher levels of self-esteem and optimismtoward life than those who are not physically active (Cekin, 2015; Maciel et al., 2013). Althoughengaging in regular physical activity promotes a greater quality of life for older adults, there isinsufficient research regarding the best approach for local communities to implement physicalactivity programs that are tailored to this specific age population.5As an outreach program within the School of Kinesiology at the University of BritishColumbia, BodyWorks offers evidence-based exercise programs to a variety of adult populationsto promote healthy aging and preventative disease management (BodyWorks, 2024a). Currently,BodyWorks offers specialty programs including the BC Brain Wellness program and the Fitnessand Mobility Exercise (FAME) program, specifically for adults recovering from a stroke or otherneurological conditions (BodyWorks, 2024b). BodyWorks also provides a weekly program calledChanging Aging, which provides two weekly one-hour classes, with exercises focusing onstrength, mobility, and endurance training (BodyWorks, 2024a). The Changing Aging program isdirected towards adults who are over the age of 55, and classes are currently offered at DunbarCommunity Center, Kerrisdale Community Center, and the UBC Osborne Center (BodyWorks,2024a). BodyWorks is hoping to expand its Changing Aging program to community centersacross the GVA to enhance the health of a greater range of older adults.Literature reviewThe current literature surrounding exercise programs for older adults is widespread andprovides strong insight into the need for physical activity programs for older adults and bestpractices for implementing such programs. There is evidence that demonstrates the benefits ofengaging in endurance training on the cardiovascular systems of older adults and in helping tomanage chronic diseases. For instance, in a study conducted by Rivera-Torres et al. (2019),researchers noted how 60% of older adults were able to manage two or more chronic healthconditions, including heart disease, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, andAlzheimer’s disease through consistent participation in two or more physical activity sessions aweek lasting between 30 to 60 minutes in length. This study also examined levels of exerciseadherence in older adults, indicating that participation was greatest in those who were currently6married, had a high socioeconomic status, and displayed limited physical or cognitiveimpairments (Rivera-Torres et al., 2019). However, limited research has been conducted on theextent to which levels of accessibility, participation interest and participation, and facilityresources impact older adults' retention and overall participation in exercise programs.AccessibilityPardasani and Thompson (2010) found that decreased participation was due to a lack ofaccessibility such as transportation to the facilities and the location of the facilities themselves.Furthermore, there has been support for “senior center without walls” in which programs andservices are provided across various locations through partnerships with diverse communityproviders. This type of concept has shown great benefits for older adults through increasing therange of programs, services, and resources available, and using the proper resources forcommunity-based needs (Pardasani & Thompson, 2010).In addition, the study conducted by Pardasani and Thompson (2010) noted howdecreased involvement in physical activity was linked to a lack of transportation to facilities.Whether it be local public transportation or senior-directed bus services, physical access to thesesites serves as a significant determining factor for physical activity engagement. Overall, theauthors highlight the importance of making facilities more accessible to people with variousdisabilities and conditions to enhance adherence to physical activity guidelines among olderadults.Participant interest and participationSome benefits of participating in exercise programs include better psychological, social,and physical well-being (Pardasani & Thompson, 2010). Furthermore, exercise program7participants also stated that enhancing their strength and endurance has helped them accomplishfunctional skills and daily activities with ease, enjoy and implement a more active lifestyle, anddecrease their risk for injuries (Kohn et al., 2015; Mehra et al., 2016). The importance of robustsocial connections for older women in community centers was highlighted in a study conductedby Aday et al. (2006). Particularly for older women living without a spouse, reported lowerscores of loneliness, and higher scores for increased perceived support, life satisfaction, andoverall well-being (Aday et al., 2006). Aday et al. (2006) discovered that group-based settings,such as peer support groups and exercising with others assisted in counteracting, or mitigatingthe adverse psychological effects of age-related stressors. These results signify the need forprograms to offer opportunities for individuals to develop meaningful positive affectiverelationships with others. Having a support network helps to ensure participants’ level ofsatisfaction and interest, one of many contributors to a successful program rollout (Shalaby &Agyapong, 2020). However, many older adults are more reluctant to participate in exerciseprograms due to medical obstacles such as chronic and acute medical conditions, fear of injury,and transportation concerns (Heydarnejad & Dehkordi, 2010).Facility ResourcesAdherence is generally greater in supervised programs for older adults where there is alower incidence or absence of training-related injuries, higher training effects, lower dropoutrates, and overall effectiveness of the programs (Rivera-Torres et al., 2019). The greatest effect,however, is the higher quality of the execution of exercise by older adults due to adequatesupervision. Additionally, in a study conducted by Mehra et al. (2016), the majority ofparticipants stated that having supervision is crucial as it emphasizes the importance of eachexercise and how it can be performed safely. Moreover, Kohn et al. (2015) noted that participants8also pointed out that an instructor had an important role in building community among theparticipants. When creating programs and services, Kohn et al. (2015) stated that allotting theprogram times during hours that are convenient for older adults may increase participation andretention. In addition, considering the needs of the participants, such as integrating time tosocialize with each other, may further increase participation and retention in these exerciseprograms (Kohn et al., 2015).Study purposeBased on the current literature regarding older adults' participation in exercise programs,this study provided recommendations to BodyWorks to help guide their next steps regarding theexpansion of the Changing Aging program into additional Vancouver community centers.Furthermore, this study aimed to address the key success factors and challenges experienced bypast and present BodyWorks members in the current Vancouver community centers along withidentifying strategies that could be implemented for a successful expansion of the ChangingAging program into new community centers. Moreover, the study will expand on various factorsthat affect program success such as accessibility, participant interest and perception, and facilityresources such as staff, equipment, and space.MethodsParticipantsThe target population of this study was older adults who were interested in joining anexercise group. This population was further separated by two sets of inclusion criteria. Theinclusion criteria for the first group consisted of individuals who had previously attended or whoare currently enrolled in the Changing Aging program at BodyWorks at any of their Dunbar,9Kerrisdale, or UBC locations. This includes those who are 55 years and older, as outlined by theBodyWorks website to be the target demographic for the Changing Aging programs(BodyWorks, 2024a). However, individuals who were younger than 55 years of age and enrolledin the Changing Aging program were still included as the BodyWorks team deemed them to beable to participate based on factors such as their physical abilities assessment and, thereforewould have similar experiences as those who were 55 and older and within the program(BodyWorks, 2024a). This subset of the target population was deemed as “Set A” for datacollection and analysis. The inclusion criteria for the second group consisted of individuals whohad never participated in BodyWorks’ Changing Aging program, were interested in groupexercise, and were 51 years or older. This subset of the target population was deemed as “Set B”for data collection and analysis. The age requirement was set to match the demographicquestions asked to participants in Set A, which included a range of “51-60” years for one of theanswers. The overall exclusion criteria for the target population were individuals who were bothyounger than 51 years of age and had never participated in the Changing Aging program.Research designIn this study, purposive sampling was the primary sampling technique. As defined byRobinson (2014), this technique involves selecting participants based on their knowledge and/orexperience with a particular subject. Following this guideline, this study focused on collectingdata from older adults who were interested in group exercise. Moreover, the sample was splitinto Set A and Set B questions whether they have previously or currently attended the ChangingAging program. Participants in Set A were asked questions on the topics of accessibility,participant interest and perceptions of exercise, and facility resources specifically to theirexperience with the Changing Aging program (see Appendix D). The purpose of this was to10investigate the perceptions of current or previous participants and gauge where the programcould be improved. Participants in Set B were asked questions from the same three topics,however, they were related to their previous experiences with other physical activity andrecreation programs (Appendix D). Additionally, participants in Set B were asked morequestions than those in Set A to gauge what would attract older adults to join the ChangingAging program in either the established locations or the prospective locations in the Sunset orKitsilano community centres.To gather primary research, this study utilized Qualtrics, an online survey tool that is freeand accessible to all UBC students, faculty, staff, and sponsored guests (University of BritishColumbia, 2023). Qualtrics also complies with the BC Freedom of Information and Protection ofPrivacy Act (FIPPA) as the survey data is kept secure and is stored in Canada (University ofBritish Columbia, 2023). Among these advantages, the use of online surveys enables quickaccess for participants, larger sample sizes leading to greater statistical power, reduced cost andtime of conducting empirical research, and no paper wasted compared to in-person surveys(Topuzovska Latkovikj & Borota Popovska, 2019). However, it was critical to consider thedisadvantages of online surveys, particularly among older adults, who are the target populationof the Changing Aging program (BodyWorks, 2024a). Older adults often perceive thecomplexity of internet use as a barrier, having lower confidence in operating electronic devicescompared to their non-senior counterparts (Davidson & Schimmele, 2019). The study willaddress these barriers to access by providing various opportunities to complete the survey, asdiscussed below.11Data collectionAfter approval was received, recruitment posters (Appendix B) containing study detailsand a QR code were created for both online and in-person promotion. Regarding onlinerecruitment, group members communicated with the BodyWorks contact personnel to distributethe poster and Qualtrics survey link via email (Appendix B) to those subscribed to a BodyWorksnewsletter. This recruitment strategy aimed to reach those who fit the inclusion criteria for Set A.Regarding in-person recruitment, different strategies were used to reach participants in both SetA and Set B. For Set A, with permission from the BodyWorks contact personnel, group membersconducted in-class announcements to various Changing Aging classes and stayed after class toanswer questions regarding technological support or the study itself. For Set B, recruitmentposters were placed in public and private spaces in proximity to current and prospectiveChanging Aging locations. Regarding public spaces, this includes bus stops and trails inproximity to the Kitsilano community centre, the Sunset community centre, and the Osbornefacility. Regarding private spaces, this includes physiotherapy clinics where group memberswork which were close to the three previously outlined areas, and on bulletin boards in theDunbar and Kitsilano community centres. Within reason, technological support was provided toparticipants, mostly from recruitment at the physiotherapy clinics.Before responding to the survey questions, participants were provided with a consentform (Appendix A) to understand the reasoning behind the study, what their role in the studywould entail, and information regarding anonymity. If participants agreed to participate in thestudy, they were sent to the first question, which asked if they had attended the Changing Agingprogram. This determined whether participants were to fill out questions in Sets A or B. Afterthat, a set of demographic questions were asked about gender, age, and how they found out about12the survey. To adhere to the study’s exclusion criteria, those who had never attended theChanging Aging program and selected that they were under the age of 50 were prompted to exitthe survey. For questions related to the topics of interest, 5-point Likert scales, multiple-choicequestions, and open-ended questions (Appendix D) were used to gather data. Furthermore, uponcompleting the survey, participants will be provided with the opportunity to be entered into adraw to win one of two Lululemon yoga mats or one of four UBC Athletics Prize Packs.Research conducted on lottery incentives and survey response rates demonstrates a positiveassociation between survey participation and completion rates (Laguilles et al., 2011). Thus, theuse of a varied survey and incentives was aimed at promoting greater participation to obtainmore data.The recruitment target was to receive at least 40 responses, which was the minimum setby the course instructor. This was due to concerns regarding the technological capabilities of thetarget population to complete an online survey along with the specific population this studytargeted. Additionally, due to time restrictions for data analysis, access to the online surveyclosed on April 3rd, 2024 at 11:59 pm regardless of the number of responses.Data analysisA mixed-methods approach was utilized to achieve a comprehensive understanding offactors that have affected the Changing Aging program’s success such as accessibility,participant interest, and facility resources (Appendix D). This study design was used as itobtained the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative methods (Curry & Bradley, 2009). Asemphasized by Curry and Bradley (2009), by combining these research methods, the limitationsof one method can be compensated through the strengths of the other method; for instance,13qualitative methods can help determine the reasoning behind some of the quantitative results.Furthermore, a mixed-methods approach helps to ensure a wide range of factors are beingconsidered concerning the research question (Palinkas et al., 2019).As this mixed methods study uses open-ended questions, Likert scales, andmultiple-choice questions, various data analysis techniques will be employed. Regardingquantitative questions gathered from Likert scales and multiple choice questions, we useddescriptive statistics, such as measures of central tendency, to analyze survey results.Additionally, this study employed a descriptive qualitative analysis to analyze the open-endedsurvey responses received and give insight to uncover underlying themes.ResultsParticipant descriptionA total of 58 responses were collected from the survey. 34 out of 58 total respondents(59%) have participated, or are currently participating in the Changing Aging program, denotingthis sub-sample as Set A participants, and were given Set A survey questions (Appendix C,Figure 1). 24 out of 58 total respondents (41%) have not participated in the Changing Agingprogram, and were directed to answer survey questions from Set B (Appendix C, Figure 1).Of participants in Set A, 3% of the participants were 50 years of age or younger, 6% were51-60 years of age, 18% were between 61-70 years of age, 45% were 71-80 years of age, 27%were 81-90 years of age, and 0% were 91 or older (Appendix C, Figure 2). 21% of Set Aparticipants identified as male, 76% identified as female, and 3% identified as non-binary/thirdgender/queer (Appendix C, Figure 3). When asked about the precise BodyWorks location, 55%of respondents have attended, or are currently attending the Changing Aging program at UBC,1442% selected the Kerrisdale Community Centre, and 24% responded to the Dunbar CommunityCentre (Appendix C, Figure 4).In contrast, in Set B participants, 0% were 50 years of age or younger, 38% were between51-60 years of age, 25% were 61-70 years of age, 33% were 71-80 years of age, 4% were 81-90years of age, and 0% were 91 or older (Appendix C, Figure 5). 25% of Set B participantsidentified as male, 75% identified as female, and 0% identified as non-binary/third gender/queer(Appendix C, Figure 6).Descriptive Statistical AnalysisSet AResults from Set A reported that 70% of older adults attend Changing Aging classes bycar; 52% travel by walking, 6% utilize public transportation methods, and 6% cycle toBodyWorks (Appendix C, Figure 7). When asked to rate their level of perceived importance ofthe proximity of BodyWorks to locations such as their homes or workplaces on a scale of 1 to 5,52% selected a score of 5 as “Very Important” (Appendix C, Figure 8). In addition, Set Aparticipants were asked to rank aspects of Changing Aging that prompted their continuedparticipation in the program, with 65% of respondents selecting “Physical health benefits relatedto physical activity”, 10% ranked “Physical health benefits related to activities of daily living”,10% ranked “Mental/psychological aspects”, and 3% reported “Social Aspects” as the primarymotivation for their continued participation in Changing Aging (Appendix C, Figure 9). On ascale of 1 to 5 ranking the perceived level of support from Changing Aging instructors andvolunteers, 76% stated the instructors and volunteers with “5 - Very Helpful” (Appendix C,Figure 10).15Set BOf the 24 total respondents who have not participated in the Changing Aging program,when asked about their experiences with different exercise programs, 79% reported havingparticipated in drop-in programs, 67% have participated in group-based exercise programs, and33% have participated in individual training sessions (Appendix C, Figure 11). In contrast, 13%have never participated in exercise programs (Appendix C, Figure 11). For Set B 36% of olderadults commute by car, 22% use public transportation, 22% walk, 16% bike, and 4% use rideservices (ie: Uber and Lyft) as their main modes of transportation (Appendix C, Figure 12).When asked about the particular accessibility features or accommodations that are importantwhen considering participation in exercise programs, 43% ranked “Cost of Program” and 30%ranked “Availability and cost of parking” as their most important accessibility feature (AppendixC, Figure 13). In a related manner, 45% indicated a presence of financial considerations thatimpact their ability to participate in certain exercise programs (Appendix C, Figure 14). Incontrast, 48% ranked “Facility Features” such as elevators and handrails, as their least importantconsideration when deciding on an exercise program (Appendix C, Figure 13). A Likert-typescale from 1-5 was used to rate their perceived importance of the proximity of exercise programsto their homes or workplaces (Appendix C, Figure 15). A mean score of 4.30 was noted(Appendix C, Table 1), with 39% ranked living close to general exercise facilities as “5 - VeryImportant”, 26% reported a score of “4 - Important”, 22% as “3 - Moderately Important”, 13% as“2 - Slightly Important”, contrasting with 0% reporting a score of “1 - Not Important” (AppendixC, Figure 15). The survey results revealed strong preferences among participants for certain daysand times to attend a fitness program. Specifically, 83% of respondents favored Thursdays, while78% indicated a preference for Tuesdays (Appendix C, Figure 16). In contrast, weekend16preferences were lower, with 35% selecting Sunday and 30% preferring Saturday (Appendix C,Figure 16). Additionally, the majority of participants (61%) expressed a preference for themorning time slot of 8:00 am to 11:00 am for attending fitness programs (Appendix C, Figure17). 91% of Set B participants expressed a preference for an exercise instructor who is "clearwith instructions", and 78% expressed an instructor who is “motivating” (Appendix C, Figure18). Results varied for an instructor who is “Enthusiastic” and “attentive”, while 22% expressed“Other”, and 9% expressed the importance of a leader who is “Loud” (Appendix C, Figure 18).Specifically, a recurring theme for those who indicated “Other” was being knowledgeable andwell-educated to allow for meaningful corrections. Notably, one participant noted how they“need to feel they [exercise leaders] understand something about aging bodies, not haveexperience only with young adults.” Lastly, when asked what type of exercise facilities Set Bparticipants were most interested in, 52% indicated they had no preference, while 13% weremost interested in “Use of free equipment (dumbbells, balls, etc)” in an exercise facility(Appendix C, Figure 19). Of the same respondents, 78% are more drawn to group exerciseclasses while 22% reported preferences for individual workout classes (Appendix C, Figure 20).Descriptive Qualitative AnalysisSet AOpen-ended questions were prompted to Set A to assess how BodyWorks and/orChanging Aging staff best support participants, with several themes emerging (Appendix C,Figure 21). First, staff attitude and behavior towards participants were mentioned multiple times,including attributes such as patience, helpfulness, encouragement, and warmth. Second,participants appreciated quality feedback that included advice on correct technique and body17positioning, as well as flexible adaptations for injuries or physical limitations. Third, the sense ofcommunity and support within the program was emphasized, with mentions of a friendlyatmosphere. Lastly, effective communication through email reminders and direct supervisionduring sessions was appreciated by participants.Based on the feedback provided, several themes have been identified relating to what SetA participants believe the BodyWorks could do to enhance their experience (Appendix C, Figure23). First, participants desired personalized feedback and instruction, preferring one-on-oneattention to ensure correct technique and if requested, provide education on targeted musclegroups. Second, participants valued opportunities for social interaction and connection throughshared interests and experiences, suggesting measures like name tags to facilitate communicationand camaraderie. Third, there were concerns about the clarity of audiovisual communicationduring sessions. Fourth, logistical issues around class size, room capacity, and accessibility ofequipment are highlighted. Some additional suggestions included making exercising morechallenging and incorporating music.Set BWhen asked what exercise format Set B participants preferred, 22% preferred individualworkouts and 78% preferred group exercise classes (Appendix C, Figure 24). Those whopreferred individual workouts shared that it provided flexibility in timing (Appendix C, Figure25). Those who preferred group exercise classes shared rationales, with common themes beingsuggesting it facilitates a sense of community and belonging, learning from others, motivationand enjoyment, guidance and support, and social networking (Appendix C, Figure 26).18Concerning expected amenities and facility resources, common themes from Set Bparticipants included storage options such as coat racks and lockers to store their belongings,locker rooms with showers to allow them to change before and after classes, secure bike storage,and open spaces to provide room for movement and various activities (Appendix C, Figure 27).Lastly, Set B participants noted their preferences regarding the layout or design of thefacility. Common themes included good air circulation and HVAC systems that maintain airquality and comfortable temperatures, ample windows or skylights to let in natural light, andopen spaces (Appendix C, Figure 28).DiscussionBased on the results, the majority of the participants from Sets A and B either drive,commute via public transit, or walk as their main modes of transportation, as well asemphasizing the importance of location, particularly regarding proximity to their homes orworkplaces. As individuals age into older adulthood, they tend to make fewer trips and travelshorter distances due to a change in needs or medical conditions that may affect mobility, thushighlighting the importance of the proximity of the facility to their homes or other frequentedestablishments (Yang et al., 2018).In regards to the results from Set A, most of the participants mentioned that their mainreason for continued participation in the program is due to the physical health benefits related tophysical activity, followed by health benefits related to activities of daily living, mental orpsychological benefits, and lastly, the social benefits or aspects of participating in the program.This data underlines the literature that supports how regular physical activity is beneficial for19older adults in maintaining physical health and quality of life (Maciel et al., 2013). Although thesocial aspects of the program were rated lowest by participants, they emphasized thatBodyWorks has fostered a strong sense of community and support. Participants from Set A havealso stated that the staff and volunteers have been helpful during their time in the program.Additionally, they also mention that the staff has best supported them by being patient,encouraging, and warm. Participants also mention that the staff has also been supportive throughthe quality feedback they provide and their flexibility in terms of accommodating their concerns.Therefore, stressing the importance of supportive and motivating staff in participant adherence.Moreover, Kohn et al. (2015) and Hawley-Hague et al. (2016) also emphasized the vital role thatstaff play in fostering a culture of community and support and the difference staff make inproviding good quality experience.Prospective participants prioritize cost as the primary factor when considering enrollmentand attendance in a program. When considering joining a program, most older adults considerthe cost of travel to and from the facility, the cost of parking, and the cost of the program itself(Hawley-Hague et al., 2016). Moreover, total cost can become a barrier if participants livefurther away, thus affecting their motivation to attend and adhere to a program (Hawley-Hague etal., 2016). This highlights the need to reduce such barriers, such as offering parking feereimbursements, offering classes while free parking is still in effect on the road, subsidizedprogram costs for low-income participants, and shuttle buses that transport participants from acentral location to the facility.20LimitationsSome limitations identified in this study were lack of time and limited resources whichaffected the sample size and diversity of the sample. Due to limited resources and the objectiveof the study, there was no data collected about ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Furthermore,the areas in which the recruitment material and these surveys were conducted were in the moreaffluent areas in the general Vancouver area, thus also impacting the sample. Therefore, futureresearch could aim to collect more data regarding these variables in the current study as it isessential to consider the perspectives of individuals from diverse backgrounds when consideringthe implementation of programs in their community centers. Additionally, utilizing onlinesurveys has certain obstacles, as older adults often view the complexity of internet usage as abarrier, feeling less confident in operating electronic devices compared to younger individuals(Davidson & Schimmele, 2019). For instance, despite receiving in-person technological support,some respondents encountered some difficulties in completing the survey accurately. Thus,future implementation of the survey could incorporate various access points such as paper-basedsurveys. Furthermore, there were issues with the Qualtrics data analysis function, whichimpacted one of the questions on the survey for Set B. This question pertains to the perceivedbenefits of physical activity, which ultimately impacted the results and recommendations.Therefore, future research should note that this may be an issue when using Qualtrics and contactIT support when needed.RecommendationsBased on the results and data analysis, it is recommended that classes be scheduledmostly on weekdays rather than weekends. Additionally, scheduling most classes in the morning21such as any time between 8:00 am and 11:00 am will likely have greater attendance andadherence, although it is important to note that offering a variety of class times is ideal as thisschedule may not be suitable for all prospective participants. In terms of location, mostparticipants mentioned that having a location closer to residential neighbourhoods would be idealas most would walk or drive to the BodyWorks location, particularly in the Sunset and Kitsilanoneighbourhoods. Regarding financial accessibility, participants in Set B emphasized theimportance of program cost when deciding to join physical activity and recreation programs. Toaddress the needs of participants of different socioeconomic statuses, Changing Aging classesshould be offered at various price points, with the possibility of subsidized pricing. Moreover,prospective participants identified various needs that they would like to be addressed in terms ofthe facility such as additional storage space for personal belongings. In terms of immediaterecommendations to improve the current program and future expansion of the BodyWorksprogram, participants highlighted the importance of having supportive and motivating staff.Some feedback provided and recommendations for current and future staff include individualfeedback and clear instruction to the participants, wearing name tags, speaking more clearly,loudly, and slowly, possibly using microphones to ensure that instructions are heard, andproviding sufficient breaks. Additionally, based on the results of the survey, it is alsorecommended that BodyWorks focuses on group-based exercises with instructors who have beenequipped with knowledge on the importance of certain exercises and muscle groups beingtargeted and some background knowledge of the health conditions of the current and futureBodyWorks participants.22ConclusionPhysical activity has been shown to be a means for older adults to decrease their risk ofdeveloping illnesses and delay the onset of chronic diseases (Marešová et al., 2019). Eventhough multiple benefits are associated with physical activity, those who adhere to a consistentweekly schedule can achieve the greatest benefits (Rivera-Torres et al., 2019). Community-basedexercise programs have been shown to be a great mechanism to help people be consistentlyphysically active (Killingback et al., 2017). This is mainly due to participants’ ability to socializewith other members during group classes, which in turn creates a positive experience for themwith physical activity (Aday et al., 2006).The BodyWorks outreach program at the School of Kinesiology at the University ofBritish Columbia has created many different exercise programs for OA. Specifically, theChanging Aging program is a group-based exercise class that is offered weekly at certaincommunity centers. However, this program has been looking at expanding into other communitycenters within Vancouver, but BodyWorks has realized that many factors must first be consideredto ensure the program can run successfully at these new locations. Therefore, this study focusedon identifying the positive and negative experiences of past and present Changing Agingprogram members along with assessing the aspects that would attract future participants to thisprogram. Once these findings were gathered, specific recommendations pertaining toaccessibility, perceptions and interests in exercise, and facility and program resources wereprovided to BodyWorks staff. The most prominent findings included the need for the program tobe located in an area that would be easily accessible via car or by walking, program cost, andpossible incorporation of microphones for exercise instructors.23Even though these recommendations were based on a sample size of roughly half of theparticipants (N= 34) having previously or are currently taking part in the Changing Agingprogram while the rest (N= 24) having never participated in the program, there was a lack ofdiversity amongst the participants. Unfortunately, due to the limited number of group membersconducting this study along with specific data collection cut-off times, the range of participantswas not representative of the diverse ethnic, socioeconomic, and cultural groups that livethroughout Vancouver. This is a critical factor to consider as the perceptions from varying groupsof people could differ and therefore influence what recommendations BodyWorks shouldconsider when looking to implement the Changing Aging program into other community centers.Nonetheless, the expansion of this program throughout Vancouver will be beneficial forolder adults as literature continues to provide evidence surrounding the benefits of physicalactivity and group-based exercise programs for aging adults. Therefore, once the ChangingAging program has been implemented and running in their new community centers, a follow-upsurvey could be conducted to achieve a greater understanding of the aspects that have beenimplemented successfully, what still needs to be re-considered, and whether a greater range ofdiverse participants are taking part in the program.24ReferencesAday, R. H., Kehoe, G. C., & Farney, L. (2006). Impact of senior center friendships on agingwomen who live alone. Journal of Women & Aging, 18(1), 57–73.https://doi.org/10.1300/j074v18n01_05BodyWorks. Exercise Programs - Kinesiology. (2024a).https://kin.educ.ubc.ca/outreach/body-works/exerciseprograms/BodyWorks. Specialty Programs - Kinesiology. (2024b).https://kin.educ.ubc.ca/outreach/body-works/specialtyprograms/Brown, R. T., Diaz‐Ramirez, L. G., Boscardin, W. J., Lee, S. J., & Steinman, M. A. (2017).Functional impairment and decline in middle age. Annals of Internal Medicine, 167(11),761. https://doi.org/10.7326/m17-0496Canada, P. H. A. of. (2019). Government of Canada. Canada.ca.https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/physical-activity-tips-older-adults-65-years-older.htmlCekin, R. (2015). Psychological benefits of regular physical activity: Evidence from emergingadults. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(10), 710–717.https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031008Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provideunique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119(10), 1442-1452.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.74277525Davidson, J. & Schimmele, C. (2019). Evolving internet use among canadian seniors. StatisticsCanada = Statistique Canada.https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2019015-eng.htmFilho, A. M. C., De Melo Mambrini, J. V., Malta, D. C., Lima‐Costa, M. F., & Peixoto, S. V.(2018). Contribution of chronic diseases to the prevalence of disability in basic andinstrumental activities of daily living in elderly Brazilians: the National Health Survey(2013). Cadernos De Saude Publica, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00204016Hawley-Hague, H., Horne, M., Skelton, D. A., & Todd, C. (2016). Older adults’ uptake andadherence to exercise classes: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Aging and PhysicalActivity, 24(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2014-0108Heydarnejad, S., & Dehkordi, A. H. (2010). The Effect of an Exercise Program on theHealth-Quality of Life in Older Adults. A Randomized Controlled Trial, 57(1).https://content.ugeskriftet.dk/sites/default/files/scientific_article_files/2018-11/a4113.pdfKillingback, C., Tsofliou, F., & Clark, C. (2017). Older people’s adherence to community-basedgroup exercise programmes: a multiple-case study. BMC public health, 17, 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4049Kohn, M., Belza, B., Petrescu-Prahova, M., & Miyawaki, C. E. (2015). Beyond strength. HealthEducation & Behavior, 43(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115599985Laguilles, J.S., Williams, E.A. & Saunders, D.B.(2011). Can Lottery Incentives Boost WebSurvey Response Rates? Findings from Four Experiments. Res High Educ 52, 537–553.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9203-226Marešová, P., Javanmardi, E., Baraković, S., Husić, J. B., Tomsone, S., Krejcar, O., & Kuča, K.(2019). Consequences of chronic diseases and other limitations associated with old age –a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7762-5Martin, L. G., & Schoeni, R. F. (2014). Trends in disability and related chronic conditions amongthe forty-and-over population: 1997–2010. Disability and Health Journal, 7(1), S4–S14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.06.007Palinkas, L. A., Mendon, S. J., & Hamilton, A. B. (2019). Innovations in mixed methodsevaluations. Annual review of public health, 40,423-442.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215Pardasani, M., & Thompson, P. (2012). Senior centers: Innovative and emerging models. Journalof Applied Gerontology, 31(1), 52-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464810380545Rivera-Torres, S., Fahey, T. D., & Rivera, M. A. (2019). Adherence to exercise programs in olderadults: Informative report. SAGE Publications.https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721418823604Robinson, R. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-BeingResearch, 5243–5245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337Seguin, R., & Nelson, M. E. (2003). The benefits of strength training for older adults. Americanjournal of preventive medicine, 25(3), 141-149.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00177-6Shalaby, R., & Agyapong, V. I. O. (2020). Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature review.JMIR Mental Health, 7(6), e15572. https://doi.org/10.2196/1557227Taylor, A., Cable, N., Faulkner, G., Hillsdon, M., Narici, M., & Van Der Bij, A. (2004). Physicalactivity and older adults: A review of health benefits and the effectiveness ofinterventions. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(8), 703–725.https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001712421Topuzovska Latkovikj, M., & Borota Popovska, M. (2019). Online research about onlineresearch: Advantages and disadvantages. E-Methodology, 6(6), 44-56Tosato, M. (2007). The aging process and potential interventions to extend life expectancy.PubMed Central (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685272/University of British Columbia. (2023, March 27). Survey tool. UBC Information Technology.https://it.ubc.ca/services/teaching-learning-tools/survey-tYang, Y., Xu, Y., Rodriguez, D. A., Michael, Y., & Zhang, H. (2018). Active travel, publictransportation use, and daily transport among older adults: The Association of BuiltEnvironment. Journal of Transport & Health, 9, 288–298.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.01228Appendix AConsent FormCLASS PROJECT: Health Promotion and Physical Activity (KIN 464)Participant Consent Form: Does BodyWORK?: Assessment of Opportunities to Expand theChanging Aging Program (Group #8)Project ID: H17-03560-A017Principal Investigator: Dr. Andrea Bundon (Assistant Professor, School of Kinesiology, Facultyof Education)The purpose of the class project: To gather knowledge from past and present BodyWorksparticipants along with potential participants to expand the Changing Aging program intoadditional Vancouver community centers. Specifically, we will be looking at the key successfactors and challenges experienced by Vancouver community center members and how theseinsights could be used to develop strategies for a successful expansion into new communitycenters. This study will expand on various factors that affect program success such asaccessibility, participant interest and perception, and facility resources such as staff, equipment,and space.Study Procedures: With your permission, we are asking you to participate in a survey. You mayonly complete each survey once. With the information gathered, students will critically examinehow different individuals understand or engage in health-promoting activities orhealth-promotion initiatives.Project outcomes: The information gathered will be part of a written report for the class project.The written report will be shared with campus partners involved with the project. Summaries of29findings will also be posted on the following websites. UBC SEEDS Program Library:https://sustain.ubc.ca/courses-degrees/alternative-credit-options/seeds-sustainability-program/seeds-sustainability-library. No personal information/information that could identify participantswill be included in these reports or shared with campus partners.Potential benefits of class project: There are no explicit benefits to you by taking part in thisclass project. However, the survey will provide you with the opportunity to voice your opinionon your experiences with health-promoting activities or initiatives in a broad sense and willprovide the students with an opportunity to learn from your experiences.Confidentiality: Maintaining the confidentiality of the participants involved in the research isparamount, and no names of participants will be linked to the data collected. At the completionof the course, all data (i.e. notes) and signed consent forms will be stored on a secure electronicdrive by Dr. Bundon. All data and consent forms will be destroyed 1 year after completion of thecourse.Risks: The risks associated with participating in this research are minimal. There are no knownphysical, economic, or social risks associated with participation in this study. You should knowthat your participation is completely voluntary and you are free to withdraw from the study andthere will not be negative impacts related to your withdrawal. If you withdraw from the study, allof the information you have shared up until that point will be destroyed.Contact for information about the study: If you have any questions about this class project, youcan contact Grace Poblete by email at gpoblete@student.ubc.ca. For questions about the course(KIN 464), you may contact Andrea Bundon by email at andrea.bundon@ubc.ca.Research ethics complaints: If you have any concerns or complaints about your rights as aresearch participant and/or your experiences while participating in this study, contact the30Research Participant Complaint Line in the UBC Office of Research Ethics at 604-822-8598 ore-mail RSIL@ors.ubc.ca . or call toll free 1-877-822-8598.Consent: Your participation in this study is entirely voluntary and you may refuse to participateor withdraw from the study at any time.By proceeding with this survey, I am confirming I have read the above information and agree toparticipate in this research project.31Appendix B: Recruitment materialsMessage for BodyWorks newsletterAs part of a course-based research project, kinesiology students from KIN 464 are conducting astudy on the potential implementation of a BodyWorks Changing Aging program at variousVancouver community centres.The goal of this survey is to gather knowledge from past and present BodyWorks participantsalong with potential participants to expand the Changing Aging program into additionalVancouver community centres.Specifically, they will be looking at the key success factors and challenges experienced by olderadults and how these insights could be used to develop strategies for a successful expansion intonew community centres.This study will expand on various factors that affect program success such as accessibility,participant interests and perceptions, and facility resources, such as staff, equipment, and space.Posters/recruitment graphics3233Poster for Mailing List34Appendix C: Survey ResultsFigure 1: Participation in Changing AgingFigure 2: Age Range in Set A Participants35Figure 3: Sex and Gender in Set A ParticipantsFigure 4: BodyWorks Location of Changing Aging Classes for Set A Participants36Figure 5: Age Range of Set B ParticipantsFigure 6: Sex and Gender in Set A Participants37Figure 7: Mode of Transportation to Changing Aging Classes in Set A ParticipantsFigure 8: Importance of Proximity to BodyWorks in Set A Participants38Figure 9: Ranked Motivations for Continued Participation in Changing Aging Classes for Set AParticipantsFigure 10: Perceived Level of Support from Changing Aging Instructors and Volunteers in Set AParticipants39Figure 11: Previous Experiences in Different Types of Exercise Programs in Set B ParticipantsFigure 12: Main Modes of Transportation Used in Set B Participants40Figure 13: Ranked Importance of Accessibility or Accommodation Features in Set B ParticipantsFigure 14: Presence of Financial Considerations for Participation in Exercise Programs for Set BParticipants41Figure 15: Ranked Perceived Importance of Proximity to Exercise Facilities in Set B ParticipantsTable 1: Ranked Perceived Importance of Proximity to Exercise Facilities - Indicating Mean,Standard Deviation, Variance, and Responses42Figure 16: Preferred Days for Fitness Program Attendance in Set B ParticipantsFigure 17: Preferred Timeslots for Fitness Program Attendance in Set B Participants43Figure 18: Preferred Characteristics of an Exercise Leader in Set B ParticipantsFigure 19: Preferred Types of Exercise Equipment and Facilities in Set B Participants44Figure 20: Preferences for Individual vs Group Exercise Classes in Set B Participants45Figure 21: How BodyWorks and/or Changing Aging Staff an Best Support Set B Participants46Figure 22: Times Set B Participants would most likely Attend a Fitness Program47Figure 23: What the BodyWorks Team can do to make Set A Participants’ Experiences Better48Figure 24: Appeal Between Individual Workouts and Group Exercise Classes in Set BFigure 25: Rationales for Appeal in Individual Workouts in Set BFigure 26: Rationales for Appeal in Group Exercise Classes in Set B49Figure 27: Specific Amenities or Additional Resources Expected from an Exercise Facility in SetB50Figure 28: Preferences Regarding the Layout or Design of the Exercise Facility in Set B51Appendix D: Survey QuestionsDefault Question BlockCLASS PROJECT: Health Promotion and PhysicalActivity (KIN 464) Participant Consent Form: DoesBodyWORK?: Assessment of Opportunities to Expandthe Changing Aging Program (Group #8)Project ID: H17-03560-A017Principal Investigator: Dr. Andrea Bundon (AssistantProfessor, School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Education)The purpose of the class project: To gather knowledgefrom past and present BodyWorks participants along withpotential participants to expand the Changing Agingprogram into additional Vancouver community centers.Specifically, we will be looking at the key success factorsand challenges experienced by older adults and howthese insights could be used to develop strategies for asuccessful expansion into new community centers. Thisstudy will expand on various factors that affect programsuccess such as accessibility, participant interest andperceptions, and facility resources, such as staff,equipment, and space.Study Procedures: With your permission, we are askingyou to participate in a survey. With the informationgathered, students will critically examine how differentindividuals understand or engage in health-promotingactivities or health-promotion initiatives.Project outcomes: The information gathered will be partof a written report for the class project. The written reportwill be shared with campus partners involved with theproject. Summaries of findings will also be posted on thefollowing website. UBC SEEDS Program Library:https://sustain.ubc.ca/courses-degrees/alternative-credit-options/seeds-sustainability-program/seeds-sustainability-library No personal information/informationthat could identify participants will be included in thesereports or shared with campus partners.Potential benefits of class project: There are no explicitbenefits to you by taking part in this class project.However, the survey will provide you with the opportunityto voice your opinion on your experiences with health-promoting activities or initiatives in a broad sense and willprovide the students with an opportunity to learn fromyour experiences. Also, survey respondents will have theopportunity to enter a draw to win one of the followingprizes: Lululemon yoga mat (2), UBC Athletics Prize Pack(4).Confidentiality: Maintaining the confidentiality of theparticipants involved in the research is paramount, andno names of participants will be linked to the datacollected. At the completion of the course, all data (i.e.notes) and signed consent forms will be stored on asecure electronic drive by Dr. Bundon. All data andconsent forms will be destroyed 1 year after completion ofthe course.Risks: The risks associated with participating in thisresearch are minimal. There are no known physical,economic, or social risks associated with participation inthis study. You should know that your participation iscompletely voluntary and you are free to withdraw fromthe study and there will not be negative impacts relatedto your withdrawal. If you withdraw from the study, all ofthe information you have shared up until that point will bedestroyed.Contact for information about the study: If you haveany questions about this class project, you can contactGrace Poblete by email at gpoblete@student.ubc.ca. Forquestions about the course (KIN 464), you may contactAndrea Bundon by email at andrea.bundon@ubc.ca. Research ethics complaints: If you have any concernsor complaints about your rights as a research participantand/or your experiences while participating in this study,contact the Research Participant Complaint Line in theUBC Office of Research Ethics at 604-822-8598 or e-mailRSIL@ors.ubc.ca . or call toll free 1-877-822-8598.Consent: Your participation in this study is entirelyvoluntary and you may refuse to participate or withdrawfrom the study at any time. By proceeding with this survey, I am confirming Ihave read the above information and agree toparticipate in this research project.I have read the information above and consent toparticipating in this research projectYesHave you ever participated in or are currentlyparticipating in the UBC BodyWorks Changing AgingProgram?End of SurveyThank you for your response. Please exit this survey byclosing this tab.Demographic Questions SET AWhich BodyWorks location(s) do/did you ChangingAging classes?NoYesNoUBC (located at the Robert F. Osborne Centre; 6108 Thunderbird Blvd,Vancouver, BC)Kerrisdale (located at the Kerrisdale Community Centre; 5851 WestBoulevard, Vancouver, BC)Dunbar (located at the Dunbar Community Centre 4747 Dunbar St,Vancouver)Age (please select the age range that includes yourcurrent age) SET AGender SET AHow did you hear about this survey? SET A50 or younger51-6061-7071-8081-9091 or olderManWomanNon-binary/third gender/ queerTwo-spiritOtherWord-of-mouth/active recruitment via in-class promotionWord-of-mouth from other participantsPoster inside of program facility (Osborne, Kerrisdale communitycentre, Dunbar community centre)Block 9Age (please select the age range that includes yourcurrent age)Block 10Thank you for your response. Please exit this survey byclosing this tab.Demographic questions SET B Poster in frequently visited establishments/public places (coffeeshop, clinics, etc.)Online newsletter from BodyWorks mailing listOther (please specify):50 or younger51-6061-7071-8081-9091 or olderHave you ever participated in an exercise program? If so,please select all that apply. SET BGender SET BHow did you hear about this survey? SET BGroup exercise programs, such as sports teams and recreationalphysical activitiesDrop-in programsIndividual training sessions, either with or without a personal trainerI have not participated in an exercise programManWomanNon-binary/third gender/ queerTwo-spiritOtherWord-of-mouth/active recruitment via in-class promotionWord-of-mouth from other participantsPoster inside of program facility (Osborne, Kerrisdale communitycentre, Dunbar community centre)Poster in frequently visited establishments/public places (coffeeshop, clinics, etc.)Online newsletter from BodyWorks mailing listAccessibility SET AHow do/did you get to Changing Aging Classes? Pleaseselect all that apply. SET AOn a scale of 1-5, how easy is/was it to commute to theprogram facility from your home? Please reflect on yourtypical commute experiences (not including unexpectedtraffic/accidents on the road or any other extenuatingcircumstances) SET AOther (please specify):CarPublic transit, including bus, SkyTrainRide services, such as Uber, Taxi services, LyftWalkingBikingOther (please specify): 1 - VeryEasy2 -SomewhatEasy 3 - Neutral4 -SomewhatDifficult5 - VeryDifficultCommuting toBodyWorks was/is... On a scale from 1-5, how important is the proximity ofexercise facilities or programs to your home or workplacein terms of accessibility? SET ADo you have any mobility or physical conditions that needto be considered when choosing an exercise program? Ifyes, please elaborate. SET AAccessibility SET BWhat are your main modes transportation? Please selectall that apply. SET B 1 - NotImportant2 - SlightlyImportant3 -ModeratelyImportant4 -Important5 - VeryImportantLiving close to thefacility is... YesNoNot ApplicableCarWhat accessibility features or accommodations areimportant to you when considering an exercise program?Please rank from most to least important (1 being mostimportant, 4 being least important). You may only clickeach answer once. SET BHave you ever considered or used virtual or onlineexercise programs? If so, what was your experience? SETBPublic transit, including bus, SkyTrainRide services, such as Uber, Taxi services, LyftWalkingBikingOther (please specify):1 2 3 4Availability and cost of parkingProximity to public transit stopsCost of the programFacility features such as an elevator, handrails, ramps, etc.Are there any financial considerations or affordabilityfactors that impact your ability to participate in certainexercise programs? If so, please elaborate SET BOn a scale from 1-5, how important is the proximity ofexercise facilities or programs to your home or workplacein terms of accessibility? SET BDo you have any mobility or physical conditions that needto be considered when choosing an exercise program? IfYes (please explain):NoNot ApplicableYesNoNot Applicable 1 - NotImportant2 - SlightlyImportant3 -ModeratelyImportant4 -Important5 - VeryImportantLiving close to thefacility is... yes, please elaborate. SET BParticipant Interest and Participation SET AOn a scale of 1 to 5, How much do/did you enjoy beingpart of the Changing Aging program? SET AWhat aspects of the program do/did you enjoy the mostthat made you stay in the program? Please rank thefollowing options (1 being most important, 4 being leastimportant). You may only click each answer once. SET AYesNoNot Applicable 1 - Did not2 -Somewhat 3 - Neutral4 -Moderately5 - VerymuchI __ enjoy(ed)being part of theChanging Agingprogram. 1 2 3 4Social aspects such as making new friends or spending timewith significant otherParticipant Interest and Participation SET BOn a scale of 1 to 5, how interested would you be inparticipating in a group exercise program? SET BOn a scale of 1 to 6, how positive were your previousexperiences with group exercise? SET BPhysical health benefits related to physical activity such asincreased strength, increased cardiovascular endurance,increased balance, etc.Physical health benefits related to activities of daily living,such as the increased ability to complete everyday tasks, theability to stand for long periods, etc.Mental/psychological aspects, such as increased self-confidence 1 - Notinterested2 - Slightlyinterested3 -Moderatelyinterested4 -Interested5 - VeryInterestedI am __ inparticipating in agroup exerciseprogram. 1 - I haveneverparticipated 3-Are you more drawn to individual workouts or groupexercise classes? What aspects of your chosen exercisetype appeal to you? SET BWhich benefits of participating in an exercise program doyou consider to be the most significant? Please rank thefollowing options (1 being most important, 4 being leastimportant). You may only click each answer once. SET B in groupexercise2 - VerynegativeSomewhatnegative4 -Neutral5 -Positive6 - VerypositiveMy previousexperiences withgroup exercisewere ___ Individual workoutsGroup exercise classesNot applicable1 2 3 4Social aspects such as making new friends or spending timewith significant otherPhysical health benefits related to physical activity such asincreased strength, increased cardiovascular endurance,Which of the following times would you be most likely toattend a fitness program? Select all that apply. SET BWhich of the following days would you be most likely toattend a fitness program? Select all that apply. SET Bincreased balance, etc.Physical health benefits related to daily living, such as theincreased ability to complete everyday tasks, ability to standfor long periods,Mental/psychological aspects, such as increased self-confidenceMorning (8:00 am - 11:00 am)Mid-day (11:00 am - 2:00 pm)Afternoon (2:00 pm - 5:00 pm)Evening (5:00 pm - 8:00 pm)MondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturdaySundayFacility and Program Resources (staff, equipment,space) SET AHow do you feel the BodyWorks and/or Changing Agingstaff have best supported you? SET AOn a scale from 1-5, how helpful were the Changing Aginginstructors and volunteers in providing modifications,feedback, cues, or any other kind of exercise support? SETAWhat could the BodyWorks team do to make yourexperience better? SET A 1 - Neverhelpful2 -Somewhathelpful3 -Moderatelyhelpful 4 - Helpful5 - VeryhelpfulThe staff were/are... Facility and Program Resources (staff, equipment,space) SET BWhich of the following characteristics of an exerciseleader do you feel are most important to you? Select allthat apply. SET BWhat type of exercise equipment and facilities are youmost interested in utilizing within an exercise program?SET BAre there any specific amenities or additional resourcesMotivatingAttentiveLoudEnthusiasticClear with instructionsOther (please specify):Open gymUse of free equipment (dumbbells, balls, etc.)Use of fixed equipment (weight machines)No preferenceyou expect from an exercise facility, such as locker roomsor showers? SET BDo you have any preferences regarding the layout ordesign of the exercise facility, such as open spaces,natural lighting, or specific architectural features? SET BWhat is Changing Aging and BodyWorksBelow is a description of the Changing Aging program,which is one of the exercise programs offered byBodyWorks under UBC's School of Kinesiology. Afterreading the text, please continue the survey by clicking onthe blue arrow at the bottom of the page.This 55+ evidence-based program is a specialty class forolder adults. It focuses on strength, mobility, andcardiovascular health through muscle- and bone-strengthening exercises followed by intervals of aerobicexercise. Additional focuses include exercises to improvechange of direction, reaction time, and core stability.Modifications are provided to accommodate differentabilities and limitations. Program features includeexercising in a safe space with other like-minded adultsand supportive instructors, strengthening muscles used inactivities of daily living, and practicing change ofdirection, reaction time, and stability drills to improvewalking confidenceIf you would like to learn more about the Changing Agingprogram, please copy this link and paste it into the searchbar of a new tab:https://kin.educ.ubc.ca/outreach/body-works/exerciseprograms/Block 2Thank you for completing the survey. The following pagewill redirect you to a new survey where you can enter thedraw for prizes (2 Lululemon yoga mats and 4 UBCAthletics Prize Packs).You will need our group number to enter the draw -GROUP 8Powered by Qualtrics
Report
eng
Unreviewed
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Undergraduate
UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report
University of British Columbia. KIN 464
Community
Health
Wellbeing
Does BodyWork? : Assessment of Opportunities to Expand the Changing Aging Program
Text