Applied Science, Faculty of
Civil Engineering, Department of
DSpace
University of British Columbia. Department of Civil Engineering
University of British Columbia. Transportation Engineering
University of British Columbia. Campus and Community Planning
Bian, Josh
Chong, Joshua
Gu, George
Lok, Alvin
Sidhu, Simar
Wongso, Jason
The final design of the Phase 4 Wesbrook Mall Redesign will maximize safety for all transportation users, while minimizing costs and tree removals across the corridor. Active transportation modes and transit reliability was deemed as the main priority in the final design. This includes a 3.0m travel lane, 3.4m bus lane, and a 2.0m bike lane on the northbound (NB) side in place of the existing parking lane. Similar dimensions are used on the southbound (SB) side, with parts of the median removed to create space for a protected bike lane and on-street parking. A 35m long underpass with dimensions of 3.3 x 3.1m (HxW) provides a safe and efficient pedestrian crossing path across Wesbrook Mall. Blue Light Emergency Phones, fire suppression systems, and lighting enhances user safety. Impeller pumps with jellyfish filters are used to remove water from the underpass during heavy precipitation events. Green Infrastructure in the form of permeable pavements and rain gardens are utilized to reduce polluted runoff and retain stormwater on-site. Construction is scheduled to begin in June 2022, with the expected completion date of March 2023. The final class A cost estimate for the project is $4.5 million. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Wesbrook Mall Phase 4 Redesign Prepared by: Josh Bian, Joshua Chong, George Gu, Alvin Lok, Simar Sidhu, Jason Wongso Prepared for: Course Code: CIVL 446 University of British Columbia Date: 4 April 2022 Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student research project and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore, readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Sustainability Program representative about the current status of the subject matter of a report”. University of British Columbia Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability ProgramStudent Research ReportWesbrook Mall Phase 4 RedesignJosh Bian, Joshua Chong, George Gu, Alvin Lok, Simar Sidhu, Jason WongsoUniversity of British ColumbiaCIVL 446April 4, 2022Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as wellas their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a studentresearch project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore, readers should bear in mind that these reports may notreflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDSSustainability Program representative about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report”.AcknowledgmentsThis project would not have been possible without the help of UBC staff, SEEDS members, designinstructors, and student designers involved with the Wesbrook Mall Redesign initiative. We would like toextend our gratitude to Dr. Yahya Nazhat for leading the project and coordinating plenaries. We arethankful to Dr. Clark Lim, Krista Falkner for guiding our team as design instructors. Continued guidance,mentorship, and support from UBC staff and SEEDS team helped immensely with the success of thepreliminary design deliverables.SEEDS Sustainability ProgramKrista Falkner, P.Eng, Manager, Campus + Community PlanningDavid Gill, Program and Policy PlannerUBC StaffDr. Yahya Nazhat, Course Coordinator and Project LeaderDr. Clark Lim, P.Eng, Design InstructorExecutive SummaryThe final design of the Phase 4 Wesbrook Mall Redesign will maximize safety for all transportation users,while minimizing costs and tree removals across the corridor. Active transportation modes and transitreliability was deemed as the main priority in the final design. This includes a 3.0m travel lane, 3.4m buslane, and a 2.0m bike lane on the northbound (NB) side in place of the existing parking lane. Similardimensions are used on the southbound (SB) side, with parts of the median removed to create space for aprotected bike lane and on-street parking.A 35m long underpass with dimensions of 3.3 x 3.1m (HxW) provides a safe and efficient pedestriancrossing path across Wesbrook Mall. Blue Light Emergency Phones, fire suppression systems, andlighting enhances user safety. Impeller pumps with jellyfish filters are used to remove water from theunderpass during heavy precipitation events.Green Infrastructure in the form of permeable pavements and rain gardens are utilized to reduce pollutedrunoff and retain stormwater on-site.Construction is scheduled to begin in June 2022, with the expected completion date of March 2023.The final class A cost estimate for the project is $4.5 million.Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 3Table of Contents 4List of Figures 7List of Tables 71.0 Introduction 82.0 Design Criteria 103.0 Key Roadway Design Components 113.1 Travel Lanes 123.2 Bus Lanes 123.3 Bus Stops 123.4 Parking Lanes 143.5 Bike Lanes 153.6 Pedestrians 163.7 GI Infrastructure 163.8 Utilities 164.0 Technical Design Considerations 174.1 Roadworks 174.2 Underpass 185.0 Underpass 195.1 Demands 195.2 Additional Features 216.0 Green Infrastructure 226.1 Pervious Concrete 226.2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement 236.3 Rain Garden 247.0 Modeling 257.1 Modeling Methodology 257.2 Compilation of Available Data 257.3 Balancing & Developing 2021/2050 volumes 257.4 Results 287.5 Limitations 287.6 Sidra Modeling - 16th Ave 288.0 Construction Works 298.1 Schedule 298.2 Risks 308.3 Inflation 308.4 Interest Rates 308.5 Risk Register and Matrix 308.6 Class A Cost Estimate 329.0 Life Cycle Analysis 3410.0 Additional Considerations 37References 39Appendix A - Construction Specifications 42Appendix B - Scheduling 54Appendix C - Class A Cost Estimate 55Appendix D - Traffic Modeling 57Appendix E - Underpass Design Load Calculations 58Appendix F - Pump Design Calculations 59Appendix G - Settlement Calculations 61List of FiguresFigure 1. Map of Project Scope 9Figure 2. Typical Cross Section 13Figure 3. Southbound Thunderbird Boulevard Bus Stop - Planview 14Figure 4. Southbound Hampton Place In-Lane Bus Stop - Planview 15Figure 5. Typical Parking South of the Underpass - Planview 16Figure 6. Underpass - Plan View 20Figure 7. RISA Inputs and Results Design 21Figure 8. Reinforcement Details 22Figure 9. Standard Detailed Drawing of Pervious Concrete Sidewalk (ACI, 2011) 24Figure 10. Standard Detailed Drawing of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement (ICPI, 2022) 25Figure 11. Standard Detailed Drawing of Rain Garden (City of North Vancouver, 2020) 25Figure 12. Thunderbird Blvd 2021 Volumes 27Figure 13. Thunderbird Blvd 2050 Volumes 27Figure 14. Construction Phasing 30Figure 15. Risk Matrix 32Figure 16. Class A Cost Estimate Chart Breakdown. 34Figure 17. Life Cycle Analysis Process 35Figure 18. LCA Summary Chart 37List of TablesTable 1. Team Contributions & Review 10Table 2. Transportation Facility - Minimum vs Design Widths 12Table 3. Standards, Codes & Software Packages 12Table 4. Thunderbird Blvd 2021 Synchro Model Output Results 29Table 5. Thunderbird Blvd 2050 Synchro Model Output Results 29Table 6. Construction Phasing Key Dates 31Table 7. Risk Register 33Table 8. Class A Cost Estimate Summary 35Table 9. Life Cycle Analysis Stages 36Table 10. LCA Impact Categories 36Table 11: LCA Results 37Table 12. Maintenance Plan 391.0 IntroductionTeam 11 Consultants completed the Wesbrook Mall Phase 4 redesign between Thunderbird Blvd.and 16th Ave as requested by UBC SEEDS in December 2021. Major components in the design includereallocation of surface auto, transit, biking, and pedestrian facilities along with construction of apedestrian underpass south of the Thunderbird Arena.Figure 1. Map of Project ScopeTeam contributions are listed below:Table 1. Team Contributions & ReviewTeam Member Contributions ReviewSimar Sidhu Drainage/Utility Drawings , X-sections, Key DesignComponents Write Up Josh Bian, Alvin LokGeorge Gu Introduction, Initial design, Underpass Pump Design,Underpass Accessories, Technical Considerations Simar Sidhu, Jason WongsoJoshua Chong Traffic Modeling & Forecasting, Planview Drawing,Standard Detail Drawings, Signage Plans Josh Bian, Alvin LokJason Wongso Executive Summary, Green Infrastructure, Life-cycleAssessment Joshua Chong, Simar SidhuJosh Bian Underpass Design and Detailed Drawings George Gu, Jason WongsoAlvin Lok Construction Management, Cost Estimate, Scheduling,Risk Analysis Joshua Chong, George GuThe scope of the project involves 5 main goals. This includes:1. Encourage, prioritize, and maximize the safety of all active transportation modes includingtransit, cycling, and walking.2. Design a pedestrian grade separated crossing to allow for safe and efficient pedestrian travel atWesbrook Mall.3. Incorporate GI infrastructure to retain stormwater on site.4. Create a curbside management strategy working in conjunction with a separated bike facility tomaintain safety and efficiency for users.5. Reduce costs where possible.The following sections describes the team’s process and methodology used to develop a final design.2.0 Design CriteriaTo meet the goals mentioned above, the team applied best practice standards along with various requestsmade by the client. The final design followed the same criteria mentioned by the preliminary design;minimizing cost, tree removal, parking removal, utilities relocation as well as improving sustainabilitywith Green Infrastructure, and prioritizing transit and active transportation. The recommended designwidths are provided and listed below in Table 2.Table 2. Transportation Facility - Minimum vs Design WidthsFacility Type Design Constrained Widths (m) Design Recommendation Widths (m)Sidewalks 2.0 2.2Bike Lane 1.8 2.0Bus Lane 3.4 minimumTravel Lane 3.0 3.2 - 4.0Parking 2.2 2.52.1 Standards and SoftwareThe team utilized various engineering standards, specifications, and software packages throughout thedesign phase of the project. The following table below outlines them:Table 3. Standards, Codes & Software PackagesStandards / Codes Software PackagesBC Active Transportation Design Guide (BCATDG) Synchro 6TAC (TAC) Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads Sidra Intersection 9City of Vancouver Engineering Design Manual AutoCADGeometric Design of Highway and Streets AASHTO CIVIL 3DUBC Transportation Plan / City of Vancouver Transportation 2040 -Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) -3.0 Key Roadway Design ComponentsThe key roadway design components are showcased in the detailed design drawings package preparedaccording to City of Vancouver Geometric Design guidelines with additional technical guidance fromBCATDG and TAC. The drawing package includes five planview drawings of the project scope withdetailed proposed design for the corridor. Proposed signage plans are included aligning with MUTCDstandards to identify existing, relocated and new signage for implementation. Standard geometric detailsare also developed to help facilitate the design of detailed specifications. The planview drawings aresupplemented with cross-section drawings detailing key locations and segments. The utility drawingshighlight the existing drainage, relocation of catch basins, and other utilities in conflict with the proposeddesign. This section discusses in detail key components that guided the design for the Wesbrook Mallcorridor. Drawing packages are attached before the Appendix.The Phase 4 redesign of Wesbrook Mall prioritizes active transportation with focus on dedicated transitand bike lanes along the corridor. The proposed design includes raised bike lanes and bus lanes withreductions in travel lane width and removal of parking lanes. Additionally, changes are proposed for theexisting sidewalks, bus stop locations, and utilities. The pedestrian crossing at Thunderbird Arena will seea significant improvement with a dedicated pedestrian underpass. Adhering to UBC’s stormwaterretention goals, GI infrastructure in the form of rain gardens, permeable pavement and concrete isincorporated at feasible locations. The proposed cross-section is within the existing right of way avoidingpotential property conflicts. This section explains the components of each feature of the design in detail.Figure 2 below lists the dominant features of the design:Figure 2. Typical Cross Section3.1 Travel LanesThe proposed design features one travel lane heading in the NB and SB directions separated by a medianalong the span of the corridor. Travel lanes are adjacent to the median with a width of 3.0-3.5m,accompanied by turn lanes at Thunderbird Blvd, and Thunderbird Arena. The turn lanes have an averagewidth of 3.2m. The travel lanes and turning lane widths are minimized throughout the design todiscourage single occupancy vehicles and provide additional right of way width for transit, sidewalks andbike lanes.3.2 Bus LanesA key feature of the redesign are dedicated bus lanes to assist with projected volume of transit at peakhours. The SB direction has a 3.4m wide bus lane for the length of the corridor. In the NB direction, the3.4m bus lane starts at Thunderbird Arena near the proposed underpass and ties into the Phase 2 bus laneat Thunderbird Blvd. The bus lanes are adjacent to the 0.9m proposed buffer, where feasible, to providephysical separation for vulnerable road users such as cyclists and pedestrians from motor vehicle traffic.3.3 Bus StopsTwo bus stops are incorporated in the SB direction and a 3.0m bus bay in NB direction. The bus stop nearThunderbird Blvd requires relocation of the bus bulge to aid the required minimum widths for the SBcross-section of roadway. The second SB bus stop at Hampton Place is an in-lane stop to providecomfortable pedestrian street space for boarding and alight and avoid potential utility conflicts at thelocation. Figure 3 and figure 4 show images of the bus stops in the SB direction.Figure 3. Southbound Thunderbird Boulevard Bus Stop - PlanviewFigure 4. Southbound Hampton Place In-Lane Bus Stop - Planview3.4 Parking LanesAnother key feature of the redesign is the reduction of the parking lanes. A parking inventory assessmentduring the morning and afternoon peak periods, determined the feasibility in removing the segment fromThunderbird Blvd to the underpass to provide right of way space for the exclusive bus lane and raisedbike lane. Parking remains in the SB direction with a width of 2.4m from the underpass until HamptonPlace. Parking also remains shortly after the SB Hampton in-lane bus to provide easy accessibility forfield users. The 2.5m wide NB parking lane from the underpass to Hampton Place also serves as theloading zone at Hampton Place. Figure 5 represents the typical parking remaining just south of theunderpass.Figure 5. Typical Parking South of the Underpass - Planview3.5 Bike LanesRaised bike lanes are designed unidirectionally with a minimum width of 1.8m in both directions alongthe corridor. To provide safety, comfort, and additional space for a door zone for parked cars, a 0.6m to0.9m buffer separation is implemented where feasible along Wesbrook Mall. The bike lanes are dedicatedfor other active transportation modes such as e-scooters and future micro mobility as well.3.6 PedestriansSidewalks are redeveloped to be 2.0m wide in both NB and SB directions. No significant modificationsare proposed for the existing 2.0m sidewalks. The existing green boulevard separates pedestrians frombikes. Repavement is also required to install permeable material.3.7 GI InfrastructureRain gardens are proposed at 3 locations to reduce water run-off and to enhance roadway aesthetics.Permeable pavement for the pedestrian sidewalk and parking pockets are designed to increase theinfiltration and stormwater retention goal set by UBC. GI infrastructure is an important criteria for thisproject hence emphasis is placed to incorporate them as much as possible.3.8 UtilitiesDue to imprecise knowledge of underground utilities at project site, the team is required to exerciseextreme caution during excavation. Because no new right of way was added, the majority of existingutilities such as the hydrants, telecom manholes, power manholes, existing gas valves, etc. are unaffected.The largest impact is on the 37 catch basins which require relocation. The underpass area has significantutility conflicts with several storm and sewer manholes requiring relocation. Gas lines, power lines,waterlines and sanitary lines will be redirected. The existing and abandoned utility pipes also requireremoval in the underpass construction area.4.0 Technical Design Considerations4.1 RoadworksTechnical design considerations for roadworks include:1. Allocating space to optimize facilities for automobiles, transit, cyclists, and pedestrians.a. Providing enough space to include dedicated transit lanes in areas assessed to develop aqueue during busy times.b. Establish continuous, raised bike lanes throughout the length of the road to providecyclists with separation from motor vehicle traffic.c. Weave cycling lanes behind bus stop landing pads to minimize conflicts between transitusers and cyclists.d. Retain parking spaces as much as possible to provide space for varsity field users andvisitors to residences.2. Minimizing tree removalsTree removals were minimized by strategically placing new and realigned automobile, transit, andcycling lanes in avoidance of trees. Curb cuts on the center median are implemented on the SBside instead of the NB side to avoid tree removals: cycling lanes were weaved around bus stops toavoid existing trees.3. Applying Green InfrastructureRain gardens and permeable pavements were efficiently designed at new catch basins and curbparking pockets to minimize changes to existing infrastructure while establishing moresustainable solutions for new GI infrastructure.4. Establishing an aesthetical and spacious design for the pedestrian underpassTo ensure the pedestrian underpass fits the aesthetics of the local environment, the team designedthe underpass with modest sized entrances while providing adequate of lighting and headspaceunderground to improve the user experience4.2 UnderpassThe main technical challenges for the underpass included facility design, tunneling, dewatering, andminimizing impacts on existing infrastructure.1. Facility designTo ensure the underpass meets existing municipal design standards and guidelines, thedimensions, ramp grade, and stair height are carefully considered and incorporated into the finaldesign.2. TunnelingThe underpass tunnel will be prefabricated and placed using a cut and cover method. Because offactors relating to low excavation depth, soil conditions/type, and overall tunnel length, cut andcover was chosen as the preferred excavation mode compared to other methods such as blastingor boring. Soil conditions beneath and beside the proposed location have been assessed andgeotechnical reports were analyzed to ensure feasibility of tunnel design.3. DewateringA pump installed in a vault below the tunnel will remove excess water accumulated duringstorms. The pump was selected to meet the head and flow criteria while also consideringmaintenance and power consumption. Technical considerations also include additional pipes andelectrical connections for the operation of the pump. Jellyfish filters from Langley Concretereduce the impact of clogging of the pump due to debris. The pump includes water pressuresensors to only operate during precipitation events, and requires regular maintenance andinspection. The considerations are captured in the final design and can be found in Appendix F4. Minimizing impacts on existing infrastructure and trafficThe depth, pathing, and grade of the underpass were designed to minimize utility relocations.Traffic disruptions will be reduced by closing only half of the road, keeping a minimum numberof lanes open during construction Detailed Design5.0 UnderpassThe pedestrian underpass dimensions were retained from the preliminary design phase and underwentfurther analysis and detailing to ensure adequate serviceability, aesthetics, and compatibility with the newroadway. The final detailed design has an overall span of 35m across with 1.75m wide entrances. Theoverall tunnel dimension is 3.3x3.1m (H x W) with 300mm walls. Details can be found in DrawingNumber 24-30 of the drawing package.Figure 6. Underpass - Plan View5.1 DemandsStructural analysis was conducted to determine the critical demands on the structure. To ensure propersteps were followed, Team 11 used the following guidelines and manuals:- CSA A-23.3 (2014) Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures- CSA S-16 (2019) Design of Steel Structures- CSA S-6 (2019) Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code- BC Building Code (2018) Section 4.1: Structural Loads and Procedures- BC Bridge Standards and Procedures Manual (2016)Demands were computed based on vehicle/pedestrian live loads and soil/concrete dead loads. Lateralloads induced from soil pressure were also determined using soil mechanics principles. The tunnel wassimplified into a box structure with fixed connections at each corner; the loads were then imputed intoRISA to determine the critical moment and shear forces at their respective locations on the structure. hecritical shear force and moment at the corners of the bottom slab are 138.6kN and 69.3kNm as shown onFigure 7 below. Additionally, a bearing demand of 92.4kPa was also computed based on the identified soilclassification.Figure 7. RISA Inputs and Results DesignReinforcement selection and placement was the primary focus during the detailed design phase. It wasdetermined that a 75mm clear cover was required where the concrete is in contact with the soil while a40mm cover was required to protect the interior face from freeze thaw cycles. In each wall, 20Mlongitudinal bars spaced at approximately 500mm were selected to resist the flexural demands. 20Mtransverse reinforcement was also used for adequate crack control. The resisting moment and shearcapacities were 74.9kNm and 167.1kN while the bearing capacity was 150 kPa. The design thus passedall required demand checks.Figure 8. Reinforcement DetailsAdditionally, 10M transverse and longitudinal stair reinforcements at various spacings were used tominimize cracks and deflections. The load demands at the stairs were deemed not critical due to lowersoil loads; hence, the stair walls and roof used the same 20M reinforcement design as described above.5.2 Additional FeaturesTo complete the design, 9 lights were selected to span across the ceiling with sprinklers placed in 2.3mintervals throughout. A UBC Campus Blue Phone will be used in the middle of the underpass. Handrailswill be located along the stairs in compliance with BC Building Code Standards.To ensure the underpass does not fail due to settlement, a check concluded acceptable final settlement of3cm based on soil conditions provided by the UBC groundwater and geotechnical investigation. Detailedcalculations can be found in Appendix G.The head requirement for the pump is 7m from the elevation of the pump vault to the catch basin atground level. A design flow demand of 25GPM was determined based on a 1 in 100 year hourlyprecipitation estimate of 10mm/hr. The design precipitation was assumed in reference to the historical rainevent that occurred in November 2021. The underpass is situated on the highly permeable upper quadrasand layer (Piteau and Associate) while the groundwater is 45m below the surface. Therefore, infiltrationinto the tunnel will only occur through soil above the underpass.Upon considering operational efficiency under varying flow conditions. The pump selected is a NS 4-23CVBP end suction close coupled single stage pump that will operate when the pressure sensor is triggeredwhen the pump is submerged. The pump will be connected to the existing AC main and powered on by acapacitor when an inflow is detected. The pump system and demand curve can be found in Appendix F.6.0 Green InfrastructureGreen Infrastructure in the form of permeable pavements and rain gardens is used across the corridor toretain stormwater on-site. The following section highlights the details of the GI Infrastructureimplemented in the redesign.6.1 Pervious ConcretePervious concrete will be used for the pedestrian sidewalk. It uses less sand and fine aggregates in the mixdesign, creating more voids in the material, which allows stormwater to seep through the surface,preventing standing water from forming in freezing temperatures. The absence of standing water and theincreased roughness of the surface improve traction for pedestrians, improving safety and comfort.Thisalso eliminates the need for de-icing salt reducing the long-term accumulation of chloride in the soil,which can negatively impact the environment.Figure 9. Standard Detailed Drawing of Pervious Concrete Sidewalk (ACI, 2011)6.2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete PavementPermeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement (PICP) is used in the parking pockets along Wesbrook Mall.This form of permeable pavement promotes stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Theconcrete pavers also form an interlocking pattern which improves aesthetics. The joints between thebricks are filled with permeable aggregates that filter stormwater before it reaches the soil subgrade.While this comes at a higher cost compared to regular asphalt pavement, PICP has a longer expectedservice life, minimizing future maintenance costs and environmental impact. The surface of the PICP willneed to be regularly cleaned using high pressure water to optimize the stormwater infiltration ratethroughout its lifespan.Figure 10. Standard Detailed Drawing of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement (ICPI, 2022)6.3 Rain GardenRain gardens will be installed along the curb extensions on both sides of the corridor (see DrawingNumber 1-5 in Drawing Packages). These create more pervious area along the corridor, promotingstormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. The soil filters out runoff pollutants before reaching thesoil subgrade. Rain gardens also provide additional aesthetic value, although regular maintenance such astrash removal, weeding, and dead vegetation removal are required to keep the space clean.Figure 11. Standard Detailed Drawing of Rain Garden (City of North Vancouver, 2020)7.0 ModelingModeling was conducted to determine the extent of the NB bus lane redesign along the entire WesbrookMall corridor. The analysis of the 2021 Base Synchro Models and 2050 Design Models determined thatthe existing 95th percentile queue length is satisfactory for the bus lane to begin just north of theunderpass.7.1 Modeling MethodologyThis section describes the process of developing Synchro models for the Thunderbird Blvd intersectionaccounting for the key considerations such as traffic volumes, signal timings, and Synchro modelparameters.7.2 Compilation of Available DataThe historical turning movement counts (TMC) provided by SEEDs were reviewed and compiled. Thehistorical TMCs consisted of 2018 and 2019 counts. Signal timing reports were also provided for theThunderbird Blvd and Wesbrook Mall intersection.7.3 Balancing & Developing 2021/2050 volumesIntersection volumes at Thunderbird Blvd and 16th Ave along Wesbrook mall were reviewed andadjustments were made for volume balancing based on reasonable estimates for changes such as landdevelopment. To account for recent population growth at UBC, a 1% compound annual growth rate wasapplied to both intersections. This growth rate was established based on a review of the historical trafficdata from UBC’s Annual Fall Transportation Plan and UBC statistics on students, staff, and faculty fromUBC Data & Analytics. Figures 12 and 13 below illustrate the 2021 and 2050 volumes developed inSynchro 6 models.Figure 12. Thunderbird Blvd 2021 VolumesFigure 13. Thunderbird Blvd 2050 VolumesTo determine the length of the NB bus lane leading into the Thunderbird Blvd intersection, analyses wereconducted for the Synchro models to determine parameters including total delay, volume to capacity ratio(v/c), LOS, and the 95th percentile queue length. Tables 4 and 5 outline the Synchro 6 model outputs forthe above elements. The model outputs are separated into AM Peak Period, (MD Peak Period) and [PMPeak Period].Table 4. Thunderbird Blvd 2021 Synchro Model Output ResultsApproach V/C Ratio Total Delay (s) LOS 95% Queue Length (m)EBLT 0.60 (0.53) [0.76] 39.8 (37.8) [35.3] D (D) [D] 20.4 (27.3) [48.2]EBTH 0.22 (0.07) [0.17] 24.3 (25.3) [17.8] C (C) [B] 14.5 (4.8) [10.8]EBRT 0.20 (0.30) [0.54] 7.4 (8.1) [22.4] A (A) [C] 2.8 (4.8) [39.1]WBLT 0.62 (0.19) [0.53] 38.1 (27.8) [37.8] D (C) [D] 23.6 (11.8) [23.7]WBLT, WBTH 0.54 (0.16) [0.32] 29.7 (13.3) [22.3] C (B) [C] 25.2 (8.9) [12.0]NBLT 0.52 (0.23) [0.55] 9.7 (5.1) [29.3] A (A) [C] 36.5 (12.8) [#32.3]NBTH, NBRT 0.62 (0.28) [0.39] 10.9 (4.9) [11.7] B (A) [B] 92.8 (29.6) [59.7]SBLT 0.17 (0.10) [0.16] 18.9 (11.7) [12.3] B (B) [B] 11.2 (7.5) [9.8]SBTH 0.36 (0.30) [0.49] 17.9 (11.8) [13.7] B (B) [B] 57.0 (49.3) [70.0]SBRT 0.31 (0.15) [0.21] 9.9 (6.4) [8.3] A (A) [A] 22.6 (12.3) [13.4]Intersection - 17.6 (11.3) [19.8] B (B) [B] -Table 5. Thunderbird Blvd 2050 Synchro Model Output ResultsApproach V/C Ratio Total Delay (s) LOS 95% Queue Length (m)EBLT 0.75 (0.61) [0.95] 47.9 (38.2) [55.7] D (D) [E] 26.3 (33.2) [#64.6]EBTH 0.23 (0.08) [0.19] 21.0 (23.1) [16.2] C (C) [B] 17.1 (5.4) [12.3]EBRT 0.22 (0.33) [0.64] 5.6 (6.7) [24.8] A (A) [C] 2.5 (4.5) [52.8]WBLT 0.67 (0.22) [0.61] 35.4 (25.8) [38.3] D (C) [D] 28.8 (13.6) [28.7]WBLT, WBTH 0.58 (0.18) [0.37] 27.1 (11.5) [22.5] C (B) [C] 30.7 (9.8) [14.9]NBLT 0.78 (0.39) [1.02] 24.5 (7.8) [112.3] C (A) [F] #87.7 (19.5) [#54.1]NBTH, NBRT 0.91 (0.41) [0.58] 29.9 (7.4) [17.1] C (A) [B] #200.2 (48.9) [97.6]SBLT 0.62 (0.16) [0.36] 55.6 (15.6) [21.5] E (B) [C] #22.0 (10.8) [16.7]SBTH 0.62 (0.46) [0.73] 27.2 (17.0) [22.3] C (B) [C] 78.1 (79.5) [114.2]SBRT 0.50 (0.23) [0.31] 16.6 (9.8) [11.5] B (A) [B] 35.1 (20.5) [21.2]Intersection - 28.0 (13.7) [30.7] C (B) [C] -Notation: AM (MD) [PM]#: actual queue length may be longer. The values are still valid for design purposes.m: queue lengths are metered out.The HCM grades the LOS of a facility on a scale from A to F. All intersections with a LOS F have beenbolded and highlighted in red. A review of the Synchro model results indicated that while most of the v/cratios are below 1.0, a few movements, especially turning movements, do have a v/c ratio near or greaterthan 1.0.7.4 ResultsTable 5 above indicates the NB left hand turning movement having an LOS F in the 2050 model. ThisLOS is reasonable because of the competing green time between the eastbound (EB) movement andstudents departing from campus via Thunderbird Parkade in the evening. This can be adjusted by retimingthe signal for the intersection to optimize the phases within this rush hour period.The maximum queue length for the morning peak NB through movements are 92.8m and 200.2m for2021 and 2050 respectively, given that the exclusive bus lane within the design will occur approximately140m away from the Thunderbird Blvd intersection. Sample 2050 synchro model reports are provided forthe AM and PM peak periods in Appendix D.7.5 LimitationsThe existing 2021 and 2050 design year models were coded in Synchro 6 without the exclusive bus lanesheading NB and SB. Operationally, the Synchro model results for through movements heading both NB &SB are expected to perform even better than the results provided in Tables 4 and 5. Other alternativeoptions were considered such as transit signal preemption for transition, but it was determined that thecurrent operations would be adequate for this design.7.6 Sidra Modeling - 16th AveA sample Sidra model was developed for the 16th Ave and Wesbrook Mall intersection to determineexisting queue lengths headed SB, but it was concluded that no geometric changes or lane changes wouldoccur at the roundabout. A sample report for Sidra lane movements and results are provided in AppendixD.8.0 Construction Works8.1 ScheduleThe construction schedule has been developed to minimize delays and reduce negative effects on trafficon Wesbrook Mall. Construction will begin with mobilization in June 2022, and continue on until March2023. Mobilization for roadworks and the underpass will begin simultaneously, but excavation of theunderpass will start only once the preceding road section is finished repaving. This reduces the time thatWesbrook Mall is closed, and allows for the simultaneous construction of both the roadworks and theunderpass. The area’s key dates for the completion of each stage are listed below in Table 6.:Figure 14. Construction PhasingTable 6. Construction Phasing Key DatesStage Start End1 June 1, 2022 July 1, 20222 July 1, 2022 October 1, 20223 October 1, 2022 December 1, 20224 December 1, 2022 February 2, 2023Cleanup and Demobilization Feb 2, 2023 March 15, 2023See a full breakdown of the schedule in Appendix B.8.2 RisksSince Team 11 Consultants released the preliminary design report, changes in macroeconomic trends havecaused significant changes to a few key risks. While factors such as safety, execution, and adverseweather are still just as harmful as they were previously, hazards relating to commodities prices, interestrates, or other macroeconomic factors have increased in both probability and impact.8.3 InflationRussia’s invasion of Ukraine, and subsequent sanctions imposed on them by western nations, hasincreased commodities prices drastically. The restrictions on Russian financial institutions makes itimpossible to trade certain Russian exports, including items which are crucial to the construction industrysuch as crude oil, nickel, steel, iron, and other precious metals.The current geopolitical crisis represents high volatility in global markets, and Team 11 Consultants is notconfident in predictions of the prices of these goods in the short term. To mitigate the effects ofuncertainty, we recommend the purchasing of futures contracts to secure prices of commodities. Due tothe severe and current impacts of this volatility, we have assigned maximum probability and impactscores for this hazard.8.4 Interest RatesThe United States Federal Reserve has announced its intention to aggressively raise interest rates toreduce spending and control inflation. The Bank of Canada has also signaled similar intentions. Wheninterest rates increase, this will increase the cost of borrowing for all parties, thereby increasing cost ofcapital. The level of impact is dependent on the change in interest rates imposed, and as this rate isunpredictable. We have assigned a maximum probability and impact score to this hazard.8.5 Risk Register and MatrixBelow is a risk register detailing the various risks discussed above, as well as a risk matrix showing therelative risk of each item.Figure 15. Risk MatrixTable 7. Risk RegisterItem Hazard Impact ProbabilityScoreImpactScoreRiskScore1 Project defaults on loansdue to low cash flowsProject lockout and/orcancellation 1 5 52Unexpected adverseweather conditions due toclimate changeDelays levy heavymonetary costs and socialcosts due to increasedpublic disruption5 3 153 Increase in consumer priceindex during project Cost of project increases 5 5 254 Increase in labor costsduring project Cost of project increases 4 3 125 Labor shortage duringconstruction or operationHalting or slowdown ofactivities, incurring highcosts for owner4.5 3 13.56 Bank of Canada increasesinterest ratesIncreasing debt serviceraises project costs forowner5 3 157Unstable supply chaincauses shortages tomaterial or equipmentHalting or slowdown ofactivities, incurring highcosts for owner5 5 258 Public opposition toadditional trafficDelays or cancellation ofproject, leading toreputational and monetarylosses1 4 49Poor implementationduring EPC phase leadingto unsafe designs or workconditionsInjury or death of projectpersonnel or users 2 5 1010Shortage ormismanagement of projectfunds leads to bloatedbudgetHeavy costs for client andpossible cancellation ofproject2 3 611Operational hazards due toconstruction flaws or usererrorUser safety threatenedfollowing projectcompletion4 5 208.6 Class A Cost EstimateThe cost estimate was developed with consideration of the risks in Section 8.2. RSMeans EstimatingSoftware containing standard costs of construction items was used to model cost. Revisions to theroadworks scope of work and green infrastructure yield a final construction cost of $4.5 million CAD,with an additional $130,000 in consulting fees, bringing the total to $4.7 million. This figure accounts forinflation, currency exchange rates, contractor markup, and bonds and insurance. Due to the factorsmentioned above in Section 8.5, the contingency has been increased to 20%, up from 10%. A costsummary is shown below, and a full breakdown of project cost can be found in Appendix C.Table 8. Class A Cost Estimate SummaryCost SummaryRoadworks Cost $1,271,235Underpass Cost $297,970AdjustmentsInflation 1.376Currency 1.28Contingency 1.2Contractor Markup 1.2Bonds and Insurance 1.05Management andPermitting 1.085Project Construction Cost $4,534,000Consulting Fees $130,000Final Project Cost $4,664,000Figure 16. Class A Cost Estimate Chart Breakdown.9.0 Life Cycle AnalysisEvery engineering project has a wide range of environmental impacts, making it essential to understandthe sources of those impacts to adopt proper mitigation policies. The Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is amethod used to assess the environmental impacts of the project throughout its life cycle. The life cyclestages included in this assessment are shown in the figure 17 below.Figure 17. Life Cycle Analysis ProcessTable 9. Life Cycle Analysis StagesLCA Stage DescriptionExtraction and Production of RawMaterials Impacts from extraction and production of construction materialsTransportation of Raw Material Transportation of material and machines to construction SiteRoad Construction Impacts from on-site construction activitiesUse of Road/Maintenance Environmental impacts due to operations and maintenanceIn this LCA, the environmental impacts of each life-cycle stage are quantified based on the followingcategories:Table 10. LCA Impact CategoriesImpact Category Abbreviation Unit of MeasureGlobal Warming Potential GWP kg CO2 eq.Acidification Potential of Soil and Water AP kg SO2 eq.Eutrophication Potential EP kg N eq.Abiotic Depletion Potential (Fossil Fuel) ADP MJThe table below shows the life cycle components and the resulting impact categories.Table 11: LCA ResultsLife Cycle Stage and Components Impact CategoriesMaterial Production GWP AP EP ADPRoadworks Input Unit Total kgCO2 eqTotal kgSO2 eqTotal kg NeqTotal MJeqAsphalt 2842 m3 1.15E+06 1.03E+04 1.63E+02 4.81E+05Permeable Pavements (Sidewalk,Parking Pockets)230.2 m3 5.15E+04 1.66E+02 6.16E+01 3.90E+04Underpass Input Unit Total kgCO2 eqTotal kgSO2 eqTotal kg NeqTotal MJeqSteel 22080 kg 4.03E+04 1.63E+02 1.38E+02 1.65E+04Concrete 76.44 m3 1.71E+04 5.52E+01 2.05E+01 1.29E+04Material TransportationTransportation of Materials Input Unit Total kgCO2 eqTotal kgSO2 eqTotal kg NeqTotal MJeqTransportation of concrete 4500 tkm 4.11E+02 1.54E+00 4.38E-01 9.20E+02Transportation of steel 7000 tkm 6.39E+02 2.40E+00 6.82E-01 1.43E+03Transportation of constructionequipment2000 tkm 1.83E+02 6.86E-01 1.95E-01 4.09E+02ConstructionRoad and UnderpassConstructionInput Unit Total kgCO2 eqTotal kgSO2 eqTotal kg NeqTotal MJeqEarthworks 704 hrs 1.41E+00 6.68E-03 3.80E-04 2.83E+00Fill 1408 hrs 6.15E+03 3.61E+01 5.81E+00 1.32E+04Underpass 704 hrs 1.48E+06 8.67E+03 1.39E+03 3.16E+06Use of Road/MaintenanceOperation and Maintenance Input Unit Total kgCO2 eqTotal kgSO2 eqTotal kg NeqTotal MJeqLife Cycle Stage and Components Impact CategoriesElectricity for Annual RoadOperation876 kWh 5.46E+02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Road Resurfacing 240 hrs 1.05E+03 6.16E+00 9.91E-01 2.24E+03Waste 2000 kg 9.62E+00 5.07E-02 1.48E-03 1.60E+01Transportation of waste 1000 tkm 5.22E+02 3.01E+00 7.20E-01 1.08E+03Figure 18. LCA Summary ChartThe results of the life cycle analysis shows that most of the environmental impacts originate from theconstruction process. This means that further measures need to be taken to minimize the environmentalrisks during construction. As such, contractors are expected to prepare an environmental assessment planas part of the tendering process.Furthermore, a maintenance plan was developed to extend the service life of the main components of theproject. The operations and maintenance costs can be found in Appendix C. The table below provides asummary of the maintenance plan for the main components of the corridor such as the main road, greeninfrastructure, and the pedestrian underpass.Table 12. Maintenance PlanStructure Type of Work FrequencyRoad Normal wear and tear (Potholes, minorcracks, paint damages on lanemarkings)Annual or as neededRoad De-icing, cleaning, tree trimming, roadsignage maintenanceAnnual or as neededRoad Road resurfacing Every 20 yearsRain Garden Trash and weed removal WeeklyRain Garden Bioretention soil replacement Every 2 yearsPermeable Pavements (sidewalkand parking pockets)Surface cleaning (high pressure waterspraying and vacuum cleaning)WeeklyPermeable Pavements (sidewalkand parking pockets)Pavement Resurfacing Every 20 yearsUnderpass Structural Inspection AnnualUnderpass Structural Maintenance Every 5 years or as neededUnderpass Cleaning and Graffiti Removal Monthly or as neededUnderpass Lighting Replacement and Maintenance Every 6 monthsUnderpass Pump maintenance Monthly10.0 Additional ConsiderationsThis report concludes Team 11’s scope of work as requested by UBC SEEDS, which covers all thetechnical steps and considerations leading up to construction. Permits were not considered in this reportdue to the project’s scale and its location on University Endowment Lands. However, it is recommendedfor the contractor to check with UBC SEEDS and applicable regulatory bodies prior to commencingconstruction to minimize lead times and prevent delays. Furthermore, Team 11 is willing to continueworking alongside the selected contractor to overcome any unforeseen challenges. Additionally, Team 11recommends UBC Seeds to continue conducting stakeholder consultation throughout the constructionprocess to ensure that all stakeholder opinions and concerns are properly addressed.ReferencesAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. “A Policy on Geometric Design ofHighways and Streets” Fourth Edition, 2001.https://sjnavarro.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/aashto-2001.pdfAmerican Concrete Institute. “Report on Pervious Concrete” 2011.https://cecollection2.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/522r-10-report-on-pervious-concrete.pdfCity of North Vancouver. “Rain Garden Standard Drawing” 2020.https://www.cnv.org/-/media/City-of-North-Vancouver/Documents/Development-Application-Resources/Engineering-Standards/Storm-and-Sanitary/S21S-RAIN-GARDEN-CURB-CUT-INLET-2020.ashxCity of Vancouver. “Engineering Design Manual” 2019 Edition.https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/engineering-design-manual.PDFChandrappa, Anush K and Krishna Prapoorna Biligiri. "Pervious concrete as a sustainable pavementmaterial – Research findings and future prospects: A state-of-the-art review." Construction andBuilding Materials (2016).Credit Valley Conservation. "Low Impact Development Road Retrofits." 2014. CVC. 20 November 2021.Das, Braja M., and Nagaratnam Sivakugan. Principles of Foundation Engineering. SI Edition, 2019.https://www.structuralguide.com/settlement-of-shallow-foundations/Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute. “Permeable Pavement with Full Exfiltration to Soil Subgrade”2022. https://icpi.org/permeable-interlocking-concrete-pavement-drawingsMinistry of Transportation and Infrastructure. “Bridge Standards and Procedures Manual” Volume1-Supplement to CHBDC S6-14, Oct.2016.https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-infrastructure/engineering-standards-guidelines/structural/standards-procedures/volume-1Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. “British Columbia Active Transportation Design Guide2019 Edition” 2019.https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-infrastructure/engineering-standards-guidelines/traffic-engineering-safety/active-transportation-design-guidePiteau Associates. “Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Assessment of Northwest Area of UBC Campus,Vancouver” Sept. 2002.Portland Cement Association. “Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement”2019. 20 November 2021.Prasad. “Settlement of Shallow Foundations.” Structural Guide, 16 July 2020,https://www.structuralguide.com/settlement-of-shallow-foundations/.Province of British Columbia. “BC Building Code 2018” 2018. \https://free.bcpublications.ca/civix/content/public/bcbc2018/?xsl=/templates/browse.xsl&xsl=/templates/browse.xslStandards Council of Canada. “CSA A23.314. Design of Concrete Structures” June 1, 2014.The University of British Columbia. “Integrated Stormwater Management Plan” March 5, 2017.https://planning.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/2019-11/PLAN_UBC_ISMP_Final2017.pdfThe University of British Columbia. “Guidelines by Division Specification”http://www.technicalguidelines.ubc.ca/technical/divisional_specs.htmlThe University of British Columbia. “Vancouver Campus Plan”https://planning.ubc.ca/planning-development/policies-and-plans/campus-land-use-planning/vancouver-campus-planThe University of British Columbia “UBC Transportation Plan.” UBC Transportation Plan | UBCCampus & Community Planninghttps://planning.ubc.ca/transportation/transportation-planning/ubc-transportation-plan.The University of British Columbia “UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2019.”https://planning.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/2020-05/UBC2019-TransportationStatusReport-Mar5-2020_0.pdf.The University of British Columbia“UBC Data & Analytics.” Planning and Institutional Research Office(PAIR)https://pair.ubc.ca/ubc-data-analytics/.1. GENERAL NOTES1. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS,SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DRAWINGS;CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND DRAWINGS;WORKSAFEBC REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICABLECONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ALL SPECIFICATIONSREFERENCED THERIN.2. ALL APPLICABLE ON-SITE WORKS SHALL MEET THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISHCOLUMBIA AND THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE BCPLUMBING CODE.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN COPIES OF THEABOVE DOCUMENTS ON SITE AND SHALL ENSURETHAT ALL TRADES ARE THOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WITHTHE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THESE DOCUMENTS.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALLAPPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED WORKSHAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM ALL AUTHORITIES ANDAGENCIES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANYCONSTRUCTION.5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUNDSERVICES HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM RECORDINFORMATION OBTAINED FROM UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA AND OTHERS. THE CONTRACTORSHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALLTHE EXISTING SERVICES PRIOR DISCREPANCIES,CONFLICTS OR OMISSIONS.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE EXTREME CARE WHENWORKING NEAR EXISTING SERVICES. ANY SERVICESDISTRUSTED SHALL BE REPLACED TO THESATISFACTION OF UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIAAND OTHER AGENCIES AT THE EXPENSE OF THECONTRACTOR.7. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALLMATERIALS TESTING. ALL TESTING SHALL BECONDUCTED BY SUITABLY QUALIFIED FIRMS.8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SAFETY INAND ABOUT EH JOB SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADEQUATEBARRIERS AND CONSTRUCTION SIGNS TO PREVENTINJURY TO THE PUBLIC AND ALL PERSONNEL ON SITE.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT A BC ONE CALLAND NOTIFY ALL APPROPRIATE PARTIES UNIVERSITYOF BRITISH COLUMBIA, BC HYDRO, AND AFFECTEDUTILITY OWNERS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCINGCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THEENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OFCOMMENCING CONSTRUCTION.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ALL NECESSARYARRANGEMENTS, IF REQUIRED, FOR THE INSPECTIONOF ALL REQUIRED UTILITY CONNECTIONS.11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN NATIVETO ALL RESIDENTS AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION ATLEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. COPIESOF THE NOTICE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO UNIVERSITYOF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER.12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA WITH ALL “AS CONSTRUCTED”INFORMATION AND SUPPLY UNIVERSITY OF BRITISHCOLUMBIA WITH AN INDEPENDENT TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY OF “AS-BUILT” LOCATIONS OF THE SURFACEFEATURES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TOELEVATIONS FOR MANHOLE RIMS AND INVERTS,WATER VALVE BOXES, HYDRANTS AND SERVICELOCATIONS. THE DATA SHALL BE PROVIDED INELECTRONIC FORMAT ACCEPTABLE TO UNIVERSITYOF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND SHALL INCLUDE THE DATEOF SURVEY, SURVEYORS NAMES AND CONTACTINFORMATION.13. TEMPORARY EXCAVATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTIONOF UNDERGROUND SERVICES SHALL CONFORM TOWORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD INDUSTRIALHEALTH AND SAFETY REGULATIONS. IF STEEPERSLOPES ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE REVIEWEDBY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORKERSENTERING THE EXCAVATION.14. THE CONTRACTORS SHALL ENSURE THAT STREETSARE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF EQUIPMENT ANDMATERIAL AT ALL TIMES WHEN CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY IS NOT UNDERWAY.2. SURVEY1. LEGAL AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDEDBY LIGMA SURVEYS.2. GROUND ELEVATIONS WERE OBTAINED BY FIELDSURVEYS CONDUCTED ON JAN. 01, 2022 AND WEREDERIVED FROM UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIACONTROL MONUMENT 69S4200 ELEVATION 81.231 NAD24.3. HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE GROUND-LEVELDISTANCES UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.4. THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THETOPOGRAPHIC DATA IS CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT FORENGINEERING DESIGN PURPOSES AND HAS NOT BEENVERIFIED.5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMINGTHE ACCURACY AND COMPLETELY OF THE DATAPRIOR TO RELYING ON THE DATA FORCONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.3. EARTHWORKS AND GRADING1. OBTAIN THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER’SACCEPTANCE OF THE MATERIAL PROPOSED FOR USEAS STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL PRIOR TO THEMATERIAL BEING DELIVERED TO THE SITE.2. REMOVE VEGETATION AND ORGANIC MATERIAL ANDALL OTHER MATERIAL DEEMED UNSUITABLE BY THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, INCLUDING BUT NOTLIMITED TO BOULDERS AND WOOD WASTE, PRIOR TOPLACING STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL AND DISPOSEOFF-STIE AND AN APPROVED LOCATION THAT ISACCEPTABLE TO UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA.3. OBTAIN THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER’SACCEPTANCE OF EXCAVATED SUBGRADES PRIOR TOPLACING STRUCTURAL FILL MATERIAL.4. TRENCH BACKFILL IN AREAS THAT WILL BE PAVED OROTHER SETTLEMENT-SENSITIVE AREAS SHALLCONSIST OF GRANULAR MATERIAL PLACED ANDCOMPACTED IN DISCRETE LIFTS OF MAXIMUM 300MMIN THICKNESS OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER’S REQUIREMENTS.5. BACKFILL WITHIN PACED AREAS SHALL BECOMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY,OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALENGINEER’S REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE AREASSHALL BE COMPACTED TO 90% MODIFIED PROCTORDENSITY OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER’S REQUIREMENTS.6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORCOMPACTION TESTING AND SHALL PROVIDEUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THEENGINEER WITH EVIDENCE THAT COMPACTION OFSUBGRADE FILL MATERIAL AND GRANULARMATERIALS MEETS PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.6. ROADWORKS1. ALL ROADWORKS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHMASTER MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS: 31 2216 RESHAPING GRANULAR ROADBED, 32 11 23GRANULAR BASE, 32 11 16.1 GRANULAR SUBBASE,AND 31 22 16.1 RESHAPING EXISTING SUBGRADE.2. OBTAIN THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER’SACCEPTANCE OF EXCAVATED AND CONSTRUCTEDSUBGRADES PRIOR TO PLACING ANY GRANULARMATERIALS.3. ALL AGGREGATE MATERIALS SHALL BE INACCORDANCE WITH MASTER MUNICIPALSPECIFICATIONS SECTION 31 05 17 AGGREGATES ANDGRANULAR MATERIALS.4. SUBGRADE AND GRANULAR BASE MATERIALS SHALLBE COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITYOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICALENGINEER’S REQUIREMENTS.5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORCOMPACTION TESTING AND SHALL PROVIDEEVIDENCE THAT COMPACTION OF GRANULARMATERIALS MEETS PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. ALLTESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A SUITABLYQUALIFIED FIRM.6. ASPHALT PACING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHMASTER MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 21 1216 HOT-MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING. IF THEASPHALT PAVING IS PLACED IN TWO LAYERS, THE MIXTYPE SHALL BE MASTER MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONSLOWER COURSE #2 FOR BASE COURSE AND UPPERCOURSE #2 FOR SURFACE COURSE. IF THE ASPHALTPAVEMENT WILL BE PLACED IN A SINGLE LAYER THEMIX TYPE SHALL BE MASTER MUNICIPALSPECIFICATIONS UPPER COURSE #2.7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER WITH A MIXDESIGN AND TRIAL MIX TEST RESULTS FOR THEASPHALTIC CONCRETE THE CONTRACTOR INTENDSTO PLACE A MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS PRIOR TO PAVING.8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASPHALTTESTING AND SHALL PROVIDE UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER WITHEVIDENCE THAT THE THICKNESS AND PROPERTIESOF THE FINISHED PAVING MEETS PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS AND MIX DESIGN VALUES.9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THE ADEQUACYOF THE PAVEMENT STRUCTURE INDICATED FORPAVED AREAS AND ROADWAYS WITH THEGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACINGSUBBASE GRAVELS.10. ALL VALVE BOXES, MANHOLES ETC. LOCATED INPAVED AREAS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHEDGRADE PRIOR TO PAVING.4. WATERWORKS1. ALL WATERWORKS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MASTERMUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 33 11 01WATERWORKS AND THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE BCPLUMBING CODE AND SHALL PASS THE INSPECTION OF THEUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA PLUMBING INSPECTOR.2. CONFIRM WATERMAIN WORKING PRESSURE WITH ENGINEERPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.3. MINIMUM COVER ON MAINS SHALL BE 1.0M.4. PIPE SHALL BE CEMENT MORTAR LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPECONFORMING TO AWWA 151 PRESSURES CLASS 350.PUSH-ON JOINT HUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH TIE-RODLUGS. 300MM PIPE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MINIMUM OFFOUR LUGS.5. FITTINGS SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CONFORMING TO AWWAC110 OR COMPACT DUCTILE IRON CONFORMING TO C153AND CEMENT MORTAR LINED TO AWWA C104, SUITABLE FORPRESSURE RATING OF 2415 KPA.6. FATE VALVES SHALL BE CAST DUCTILE IRON BODYCONFORMING TO AWWA C500 OR DUCTILE IRON BODYCONFORMING TO AWWA C509 TO WORKING PRESSURE 1380KPA, SOLID WEDGE RESILIENT-SEATED NON-RISING STEM.7. JOINT RESTRAINTS SHALL BE UNI-FLANGE OR APPROVEDEQUIVALENT SUITABLE FOR DUCTILE IRON PUSH-ON PIPEJOINTS.8. A MINIMUM 3M HORIZONTAL DISTANCE SHALL BEMAINTAINED BETWEEN A WATERMAIN AND A SANITARY ORSTORM SEWER. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5M VERTICALCLEARANCE WHERE SEWERS CROSS WATERMAINS.9. WATERMAIN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WRAPPED WHERE THESEPARATION BETWEEN A WATERMAIN AND SANITARY ORSTORM SEWER IS LESS THAN 3M. THE JOINTS SHALL BEWRAPPED WITH PETROLATUM TAPE, SUCH AS DENSO TAPE,OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. MASTIC OR COMPOUND SHALLBE APPLIED TO EACH JOIN PRIOR TO WRAPPING. THE MASTICSHALL BE DENSO PASTE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.10. THE PIPE SURFACE SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TOAPPLICATION OF THE MASTIC. THE MASTIC SHALL BEAPPLIED TO ALL IRREGULAR SURFACES TO ENSURE THESMOOTH APPLICATION OF TAPE.11. TAPE SHALL BE WRAPPED OVER THE PREPARED SURFACE INSMOOTH EVEN SPIRALS WITH AN OVERLAP OF 50,, FOR EACHSPIRAL. TENSION APPLIED DURING THE WRAPPING MUSTNOT CAUSE STRETCHING OF THE TAPE. FOLDS AND AIRPOCKETS SHALL BE PRESSED OUT BY HAND.12. MATERIALS AND APPLICATION SHALL CONFORM TO AWWAC217, CURRENT VERSION.13. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS SHALL NOT EXCEED ON-HALFMAXIMUM DEFLECTION SPECIFIED IN AWWA C600 ORONE-HALF MAXIMUM DEFLECTION RECOMMENDED BY PIPEMANUFACTURER.14. TESTING, FLUSHING AND CHLORINATION OF WATERMAINSSHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MASTER MUNICIPALSPECIFICATIONS SECTION 33 11 01 WATERWORKS. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING FOR THECOLLECTION AND TESTING OF BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES.UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA OR THE CITY’SREPRESENTATIVE SHALL WITNESS THE TESTING ANDCOLLECTION OF THE SAMPLES. NOTIFY UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS INADVANCE OF TESTING. BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SHALLBE CONDUCTED BY A SUITABLY QUALIFIED TESTINGLABORATORY. PROVIDE TEST RESULTS TO UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER.15. THE EXISTING WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL REMAIN INOPERATION AND MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING THEPROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ANY AND ALLBYPASS PIPING AND VALVES THAT MAY BE REQUIREDDURING TIE-IN TO AND COMMISSIONING OF THE NEW PUMPSTATION.16. THE NEW WATERMAINS, PUMP STATION, AND CHAMBERSMUST BE CONSTRUCTED, TESTED, COMMISSIONED ANDACCEPTED BY UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA PRIOR TOCONNECTING THE EXISTING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TO THENEW WORKS.17. ON BEHALF OF THE CONTRACTOR UNIVERSITY OF BRITISHCOLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF CLOSING ANY VALVES,DISCONNECTING ANY PIPE OR MAKING NEW CONNECTIONS.18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISHCOLUMBIA AND THE ENGINEER WITH A WORK PLAN FORTESTING AND COMMISSIONING OF THE NEW WATERMAINSAND PUMP STATION. THE PLAN SHALL DEMONSTRATE HOWTHE WATER SUPPLY TO RESIDENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED ATALL TIMES DURING THE PROJECT, INCLUDING DURINGTESTING AND COMMISSIONING.5. STORM SEWER1. ALL STORM SEWER WORKS TO BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH MASTER MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION33 40 01 STORM SEWERS AND THE RELEVANTSECTIONS OF THE BC PLUMBING CODE AND SHALLPASS THE INSPECTION OF UNIVERSITY OF BRITISHCOLUMBIA PLUMBING INSPECTOR.2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED MAINS SHALL BE PVCDR35 PIPE CONFORMING TO ASTM D2412 AND ASTMD3034 AND CERTIFIED TO CSA 182.2. MAINS 250MMOR GREATER MAY BE NON-REINFORCED CONCRETECLASS 3 PIPE CONFORMING TO ASTM C14 WITH THEPIPE DESIGN FOR RUBBER GASKET JOINTS.3. MANHOLES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHMASTER MUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 33 4401 MANHOLES AND CATCHBASINS. UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED MANHOLES SHALL BE 1050MMDIAMETER CONFORMING TO ASTM C478 WITHFRAME AND COVER TO ASTM A48 AND SUITABLEFOR H20 LOADING.4. CATCHBASINS SHALL BE 600MM DIAMETER WITHFRAME AND GRATE SUITABLE FOR H20 LOADINGAND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MASTERMUNICIPAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 33 44 01MANHOLES AND CATCHBASINS.5. CATCH BASIN LEADS SHALL BE 150MM PVC DR28CONFORMING TO ASTM D3034 AND CERTIFIED TOCSA 182.2.7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES DURINGCONSTRUCTION OF THE WORKS. EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIAREQUIREMENTS2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE UNIVERSITY OFBRITISH COLUMBIA 24 HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACTNAMES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS PRIOR TOCOMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.3. ALL WORK SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN AND COMPLETEDIN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT THE RELEASEOF SEDIMENT LADEN WATER INTO ANY WATERCOURSE, STORM SEWER OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NOSEDIMENT LADEN WATER SHALL BE PUMPED OROTHERWISE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY TO A WATERCOURSE, STORM SEWER OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM INA MANNER THAT BYPASSES SEDIMENTATIONCONTROL FACILITIES.4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORINSTALLING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORMONITORING AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL WORKS IN PROPEROPERATING CONDITION.6. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WORKSSHALL BE INSPECTED ON A WEEKLY BASIS. THEINSPECTIONS SHALL BE RECORDED IN A LOG BOOK.THE LOG BOOK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE TOUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA UPON REQUEST.DURING PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANT RAINFALL,ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING ONWEEKENDS, SHALL BE PERFORMED TO ENSURESEDIMENT CONTROL WORKS ARE FUNCTIONINGPROPERLY.7. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM THE EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL WORKS SHALL BE DISPOSEDOF IN A MANNER THAT PREVENTS ITS RE-ENTRYINTO THE SITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND/OR ANYSTORM SEWER SYSTEM OF WATER COURSE.8. INSTALL SEDIMENT BARRIERS AT CATCH BASINS OROTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THEPROJECT SITE AND OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT SITETHAT ARE NEAR THE WORK AREA PRIOR TOCOMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.9. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCECONSISTING OF 75MM CLEAR CRUSH ROCKUNDERLAIN BY ARMTEX 250 FILTER CLOTH, ORAPPROVED EQUIVALENT, SHALL BE INSTALLED ATALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO PREVENTVEHICLES FROM TRACKING MATERIAL OFF THE SITE.IF MATERIAL CONNECT BE REMOVED FROMVEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE, THE CONTRACTORSHALL INSTALL A WHEEL WASH.10. ROADWAYS, WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, USEDBY CONSTRUCTION-RELATED VEHICLES ANDEQUIPMENT TO ACCESS THE SITE SHALL BE SWEPTDAILY. MECHANICALLY SWEEP CLEAN ROADWAYSFOR DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM.DO NOT SWEEP OR WASH SEDIMENT INTO CATCHBASINS, MANHOLES, DITCHES OR SWALES.11. STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED WITH6MIL POLYETHYLENE SHEETING. THE SHEETINGSHALL BE SECURED IN A PLACE IN MANNER THATPREVENTS THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL FROM BEINGEXPOSED TO THE ELEMENTS.12. USE DUST CONTROL MEASURES TO REDUCE DUSTGENERATED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES,EXCAVATED AREAS SHALL BE SPRINKLED UNTILDAMP OR AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER.DO NOT OVER WATER AS TO CREATE RUNOFF.13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE TOTALSUSPENDED SOLIDS OF THE WATER DISCHARGINGFROM THE PROJECT SITE ARE AT ALL TIMES THAN75MG/L WITH PH BETWEEN 6 AND 914. FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL OR COMPLY WITH EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULTIN A STOP WORK ORDER.2022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4GENERAL NOTES - CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS0 5m1:1001122021-11-232022-03-26ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R - B1.8m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE (TYP.)1.8m RAISED ASPHALTBIKE LANERELOCATE LAMP POSTRELOCATE SIGNAGERELOCATE CATCHBASIN (TYP.)2.0m RAISED ASPHALTBIKE LANE (TYP.)2.0m SIDEWALK (TYP.)200mm CURB (TYP.)2.0m PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)RELOCATE BUS SHELTERINTO BUS BULGE200mm CURB (TYP.)REMOVAL OF EX. CURBASPHALT RAMP (TYP.)3.3m EX. TRAVEL LANE3.3m EX. TRAVEL LANE3.7m EX. TRAVEL LANE3.2m PR. TURN LANE3.2m PR. TRAVEL LANE3.4m PR. BUS LANE3.2m PR. TRAVEL LANE3.4m PR. BUS LANEWESBROOK MALLTHUNDERBIRD BOULEVARD3.4m EX. BUS LANE3.7m EX. TRAVEL LANE (TYP.)END OF CHAINAGEWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 10m1:2002122021-11-23 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION2022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTION2022-03-26SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 1 B3.5m PR. TURN LANE3.2m PR. TURN LANE1.8m RAISED ASPHALTBIKE LANE (TYP.)200mm CURB (TYP.)2.0m EX. SIDEWALK (TYP.)2.0m PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)2.0m EX. SIDEWALK (TYP.)0.9m PR. BUFFER & CURB (TYP.)2.0m RAISED BIKE LANE (TYP.)REMOVAL OF EX. CURBRELOCATECATACHBASIN (TYP.)2.0m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE (TYP.) 0.9 PR. BUFFER (TYP.)RELOCATE CATCHBASIN (TYP.)2.0 PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)3.0m PR. LANE MERGE2.0m RAISED BIKE LANE (TYP.)200mm CURB (TYP.)REMOVAL OF EX. CURBREMOVAL OF EX. CURB3.2m PR. TRAVEL LANE3.4m PR. BUS LANE3.0m PR. TRAVEL LANE3.4m PR. BUS LANE3.5m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.5m PR. PARKING LANE3.4m PR. BUS LANE3.0m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.4m PR. PARKING LANEWESBROOK MALLPEDESTRIAN UNDERPASSWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 10m1:2002122021-11-23 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION2022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTION2022-03-26SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 2 B0.9m PR. BUFFER & CURB (TYP.)2.0m PR. RAIN GARDEN2.0m EX. SIDEWALK (TYP.)2.0m RAISED BIKE LANE (TYP.)0.9m PR. BUFFER& CURB RELOCATECATACHBASIN (TYP.)2.0m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE2.5m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE1.0m PR. CURB & BUSLANDING PAD (TYP.)2.5m EX. SIDEWALK (TYP.)2.0m PR. BIKE LANE (TYP.)0.9 PR. BUFFER (TYP.)RELOCATE CATCHBASIN (TYP.)2.0 PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)3.0m PR. TURN LANE (TYP.)200mm CURB (TYP.)REMOVAL OF EX. CURBREMOVAL OF EX. CURB3.5m EX. TRAVEL LANE2.5m PR. PARKING LANE4.0m EX. TRAVEL LANE2.5m PR. LOADING ZONE4.0m EX. TRAVEL LANE3.0m PR. BUS BAY3.4m PR. BUS LANE3.0m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.4m PR. PARKING LANE3.4m PR. BUS LANE3.0m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.4m PR. PARKING LANEWESBROOK MALLWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 10m1:2002122021-11-23 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION2022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTION2022-03-26SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 3 B0.6m PR. BUFFER1.0m PR. BUFFER & CURB2.4m EX. SIDEWALK3.3m EX. LANE MERGE0.8m PR. BUFFER2.0m PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)1.8 PR. RAISED BIKE LANE200mm CURBRELOCATE CATCHBASINS (TYP.)3.0m PR. LANDING PADREMOVAL OF EX. CURB2.1m PR. RAIN GARDEN2.0m PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)1.6m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE200mm CURB (TYP.)MIN 3.8m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.1m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE4.0m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.5m PR. LOADING ZONE/PARKING LANE2.5m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE2.5m PR. LOADING ZONE3.4m EX. BUS LANE3.0m EX. TRAVEL LANE2.2m PR. PARKING LANE2.0m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE2.1m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE3.4m PR. BUS & TURN LANE3.0m PR. TRAVEL LANEWESBROOK MALLHAMPTON PLIN-LANE BUS STOPWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 10m1:2002122021-11-23 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION2022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTION2022-03-26SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 4 B0.6m PR. BUFFER2.1m PR. BUFFER3.6m PR. RAIN GARDEN200mm PR. CURB (TYP.)1.8m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE2.0m PR. SIDEWALK (TYP.)2.0m PR. RAISED BIKE LANE0.8m PR. BUFFER2.2m PR. PARKING LANEREMOVAL OF EX. CURBRELOCATE CATCH BASINS (TYP.)2.1m PR. RAISED BIKE LANEMIN 3.8m PR. TRAVEL LANE2.1m PR. RAISED BIKE LANEMIN 3.8m PR. TRAVEL LANE3.0m EX. TRAVEL LANE3.4m EX. BUS LANE3.0m EX. TRAVEL LANE3.4m EX. BUS LANEWESBROOK MALLW 16TH AVENUEBEGINNING OF CHAINAGEWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 10m1:2002122021-11-23 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION2022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTION2022-03-26SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 5 B86.0088.0090.0092.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00Raised Bike LaneMedianBus Lane TravelLaneTravelLaneTurnLaneBoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneParkingLaneBufferCurbBoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thExisting SurfaceTrack FieldResidential Area-2.00%-2.00% 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgradeCross-Section 2Station 1+9084.0086.0088.0090.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00CurbBoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneBus LaneCurbMedianBus Lane RainGardenTravelLaneTravelLaneBoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneSidewalkNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thExisting SurfaceTrack FieldWest 16th-2.00% -2.00%Cross-Section 1Station 0+65 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgrade2022-03-26ISSUED FORPRELIMINIMARY DESIGN WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 5m1:1001SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuGeorge GuJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 6 B122021-11-232022-03-26ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION88.0090.0092.0094.0096.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00Parking LaneBoulevardSidewalkBus LaneBufferRaised Bike LaneMedian TravelLaneTravelLaneBus Lane TurnLaneParking LaneRain GardenBoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneCurbNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thExisting SurfaceThunderbird FieldResidential Area-2.00%-2.00% 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgradeCross-Section 4Station 4+6088.0090.0092.0094.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00Parking LaneBoulevardSidewalkBus LaneBufferRaised Bike LaneMedian TravelLaneTravelLaneBus Lane TurnLaneBusBayBuffer Raised Bike LaneBoulevardSidewalkCurbNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thExisting SurfaceThunderbirdFieldResidential Area-2.00%-2.00%Cross-Section 3Station 3+82 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgrade2022-03-26ISSUED FORPRELIMINIMARY DESIGN WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 5m1:1001SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuGeorge GuJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 7 B122021-11-232022-03-26ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION90.0092.0094.0096.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00Northbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thMedianCurbBoulevardSidewalkCurbBoulevard Raised Bike LaneSidewalkThunderbirdArenaResidential AreaBus LaneBus LaneRaisedBike LaneTravelLaneTravelLaneTurnLane-2.00%-2.00%Existing Surface 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgradeCross-Section 6Station 6+00Northbound- Towards UBCExisting Surface90.0092.0094.0096.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00Southbound- Towards W16thBufferBoulevardSidewalkParking LaneBoulevard Raised Bike LaneSidewalkWesbrookMall FieldResidential AreaStation 547Underpass-WesbrookMall FieldBus LaneBufferRaised Bike LaneMedianTravelLaneTravelLaneTurnLaneParking Lane-2.00% 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgrade-2.00%Cross-Section 5Station 5+472022-03-26ISSUED FORPRELIMINIMARY DESIGNWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall PlanSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuGeorge GuJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 8 B0 5m1:1001122021-11-232022-03-26ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION92.0094.0096.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00BoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneRaised Bike LaneBus LaneTravelLaneTurnLaneMedianBus Lane TravelLaneBoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneCurbCurbBoulevard Raised Bike LaneNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thExisting SurfaceThunderbirdArenaResidential Area-2.00% -2.00% 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgradeCross-Section 8Station 7+2592.0094.0096.000.00 10.00 20.00 30.00-10.00-20.00-30.00BoulevardSidewalkRaised Bike LaneTravelLaneTurnLaneBus LaneMedianCurbCurbBus Lane TravelLaneBusBayTransitShelterBoulevard Raised Bike LaneSidewalkNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thNorthbound- Towards UBCSouthbound- Towards W16thExisting SurfaceThunderbirdArenaResidential Area-2.00% -2.00% 150 mm Base250mmSub-baseSubgradeCross-Section 7Station 6+62SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuGeorge GuJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 9 B2022-03-26ISSUED FORPRELIMINIMARY DESIGNWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Plan0 5m1:1001122021-11-232022-03-26ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGNISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIONBUS LANEEXISTING CATHCBASINEXISTING DRAINAGEPROPOSED RELOCATION FORCACTCHBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING MANHOLERELOCATE LIGHT POLEPROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONEXISTING CATHCBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONEXISTING GAS LINEPROPOSED LOCATIONFOR LIGHT POLE0 10m1:2002SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuAlivn LokJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 6 BBUS LANEEXISITING SANITARY MANHOLEEXISTING DRAINAGEPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINCAUTION STORMCLEANOUTSREMOVE EXISTINGGAS LINEPROPOSEDREPLOCATION FORGAS LINEPROPOSEDGAS LINECAUTION DURINGCONSTRUCTIONGAS LINE IN VICINITYCAUTION DURING CONSTRUCTIONTELECOM LINE IN VICINITYPROPOSED NEW DRAINAGECONNECTIONCONFLICT WITH ABANDONEDDRAINAGE. REMOVE PIPEREMOVE SANITARYLINEREMOVE SANITARY MANHOLEREMOVE DRAINAGE/STORMMANHOLE AND PIPESPOWER LINECONFLICTSPOWER LINECONFLICTSEXISITING WATERCONNECTIONPROPOSEDREPLOCATION FORWATERMAINEXISITING WATERMAINCONNECTIONPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED SANITARYMANHOLEREMOVE WATER MAINUNDERPASSLOCATIONREMOVE ABANDONEDDRAINAGE PIPESEXISTING GAS LINESIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuAlivn LokJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 7 B0 10m1:2002PROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RAINGARDENEXISTING DRAINAGEEXISTING GAS LINESIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuAlivn LokJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 8 B0 10m1:2002BUS LANEPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINEXISTING DRAINAGEEXISTING GAS LINESIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuAlivn LokJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 9 B0 10m1:2002ISIJISISISISISISISIJPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATION FOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINPROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONPROPOSED PIPE INSTALLATIONPROPOSED RELOCATIONFOR CACTCHBASINEXISTING CATHCBASINEXISTING DRAINAGEEXISTING GAS LINE0 10m1:2002SIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Simar SidhuAlivn LokJosh BianSimar Sidhu2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-26 01 1228 R 10 BBEGINSTOPEDESTRIANSBEGINSTOPEDESTRIANSENDSWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Signage Plan0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 15 BMAXIMUMkm / h UNDERPASSUNDERPASSBEGINSWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Signage Plan0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 16 BFIRE SIGNALSTOP LINEFIRESIGNALTOPEDESTRIANSWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Signage Plan0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 17 BMAXIMUMkm / hEXCEPT BUSESEXCEPTBICYCLESDISASTERRESPONSEROUTETOPEDESTRIANSWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Signage Plan0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 18 BENDSROUNDABOUTkm / hTO ONCOMINGTRAFFICENDSBEGINSWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Wesbrook Mall Signage Plan0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 19 BWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Standard Detail Geometric Drawings0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 20 BWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Standard Detail Geometric Drawings0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 21 BWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Standard Detail Geometric Drawings0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 22 BWESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Standard Detail Geometric Drawings0 10m1:20022022-03-26ISSUED FORCONSTRUCTIONSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEWesbrook Mall Phase 42022-03-262022-03-26Joshua ChongAlivn LokJosh BianJoshua Chong2022-03-262022-03-262022-03-262022-03-2601 1228 R 23 BSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONAND INFRASTRUCTUREREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEBRANCHREGION_NAMEWestbrook Mall Phase 42021-11-302021-11-30Josh BianGeorge GuGeorge GuJosh Bian2021-11-302021-11-302021-11-302021-11-30 01 1228 R 10 A2021-11-30ISSUED FORPreliminary Design1:75WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Pedestrian Underpass DetailsSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONAND INFRASTRUCTUREREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEBRANCHREGION_NAMEWestbrook Mall Phase 42021-11-302021-11-30Josh BianGeorge GuGeorge GuJosh Bian2021-11-302021-11-302021-11-302021-11-30 01 1228 R 11 A2021-11-30ISSUED FORPreliminary Design1:45WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Pedestrian Underpass DetailsSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONAND INFRASTRUCTUREREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEBRANCHREGION_NAMEWestbrook Mall Phase 42021-11-302021-11-30Josh BianGeorge GuGeorge GuJosh Bian2021-11-302021-11-302021-11-302021-11-30 01 1228 R 12 A2021-11-30ISSUED FORPreliminary Design1:05WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Pedestrian Underpass DetailsSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONAND INFRASTRUCTUREREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEBRANCHREGION_NAMEWestbrook Mall Phase 42021-11-302021-11-30Josh BianGeorge GuGeorge GuJosh Bian2021-11-302021-11-302021-11-302021-11-30 01 1228 R 10 A2021-11-30ISSUED FORPreliminary Design1:75WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Pedestrian Underpass DetailsSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERSCALECAD FILENAMEDATEMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATIONAND INFRASTRUCTUREREVDESIGNEDDATESENIOR DESIGNERQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATEBRANCHREGION_NAMEWestbrook Mall Phase 42021-11-302021-11-30Josh BianGeorge GuGeorge GuJosh Bian2021-11-302021-11-302021-11-302021-11-30 01 1228 R 10 A2021-11-30ISSUED FORPreliminary Design1:75WESBROOK MALL REDESIGNPHASE 4Pedestrian Underpass DetailsAppendix A - Construction Specifications1. Concrete Walks, Curbs and Gutters1.1. GENERAL1.1.1. Related Work1.1.1.1. Storm Sewers1.2. PRODUCTS1.2.1. Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) or Acrylonitrile Butadiene-Styrene (ABS) plastics shall meet therequirements of the latest revision of CAN / CSA 182.1. Pipe shall be available in 3mlengths with nominal diameter of 100mm and perforations as detailed in Section 4.1.4 ofCAN / CSA 182.1 for leach field pipe. The pipe will include bell and spigot design suitablefor solvent welding, where required. The pipe shall have an SDR of 28 or lower and 700kPaat 5% deflection.1.3. EXECUTION1.3.1. Formwork1.3.1.1. At lanes, crossings and other similar locations, formwork shall be left in place until theconcrete has attained sufficient strength to bear traffic loads without edge damage.Sufficient strength generally means minimum 20MPa in concrete strength1.3.2. Driveway Crossings and Wheel Chair Ramp1.3.2.1. Wheel Chair Ramps1.3.2.1.1. Ramps shall land wheelchair and other users safely in the crosswalk and in thedesired direction of travel.1.3.2.1.2. The ramp and the directional score lines shall lead into the crosswalk, lining upwith the ramp across the Street and be parallel with the crossing or markedcrosswalk.1.3.2.2. Double Curb Ramp1.3.2.2.1. Minimum 1.0m full curb is required between the two ramps as per StandardDetail Drawing C8.1. Double curb ramps are preferred, and shall be implementedwhenever possible, over large single curb ramps1.3.2.3. Large Single Curb Ramp1.3.2.3.1. The ramp must adequately land a pedestrian in both crosswalks as per StandardDetail Drawing C8.2.1.3.2.4. Lane Curb Ramp1.3.2.4.1. The ramp and the directional score lines shall line up with the ramp across thelane and be parallel with the crossing as per Standard Detail Drawing C9.1.1.3.2.4.2. The minimum thickness of all residential concrete driveway crossings shall be200mm as per Standard Detail Drawing C7.1. The minimum thickness forcommercial crossings is 300mm as per Standard Detail Drawing C7.2.1.3.3. Control Joints1.3.3.1. Walks 1.5m, 1.8m, and 2.0m in width shall be marked off in panels 1.5m, 1.8m, or2.0m long respectively unless otherwise directed by the Owner Representative.Control joints to control and minimize cracking shall be installed to the satisfaction ofthe Owner Representative. The scoring pattern of the sidewalk is governed by thedistance between features such as tree pits and water valve boxes. Keep the scoringpattern as square as possible for the sidewalk panels.1.3.4. Isolation Joints1.3.4.1. Carefully fit, cut, and mark the sidewalk around all features such as water valve boxes,lamp standards, poles, and hydrants to prevent cracking of the slabs, to the satisfactionof the Owner Representative.1.3.5. Finishing1.3.5.1. Cutting and marking tools shall have a cutting edge not less than 25mm in depth andthe edge of the panel shall be rounded to a 6mm radius. Trowel edge to be as close toflush as possible with broom finish. The broom finish shall extend to the edge of thepanel.1.3.5.2. Finished curb and gutter shall have a smooth and uniform surface, true to line, grade,and section and shall be free from voids, sags, bumps, or other irregularities to thesatisfaction of the Owner Representative.1.3.5.3. All control joints are to be sawcut only (no trowel marks) and shall be done 24 hoursafter the pour to avoid any cracking.1.3.5.4. All score lines are to be trowelled only.1.3.6. Acceptance1.3.6.1. Any portion marked or damaged by vandalism, rain, frost, equipment, traffic, or other,to be replaced at the Contractor’s cost.1.3.6.2. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to existing concrete walks, curbs,and gutters at their Site or any damages at adjacent sites, and shall make all necessaryrepairs, at their cost, to any damage caused from their construction activities to thesatisfaction of the Owner Representative.2. Cast-in-Place Concrete2.1. PRODUCTS2.1.1. Materials2.1.1.1. All concrete used under this specification shall be ready-mixed concrete, proportionedand mixed in an approved mixing plant.2.1.2. Concrete Mixes2.1.2.1. All concrete supplied shall meet the requirements of CAN / CSA-A23.1 andCity-specified mix requirements unless otherwise allowed by the OwnerRepresentative. Concrete shall be normal weight, and the Contractor and its suppliershall assume responsibility for the quality and performance of the concrete as perCAN / CSA-A23.1 Table 5 Alternative 1. Submit mix designs to the ContractAdministrator for review and record upon request.2.2. EXECUTION2.2.1. Cold Weather Placement2.2.1.1. Cold weather requirements apply when the air temperature is at or below 5˚C, or isforecast to fall below 5˚C within 24 hours of placing. Do not schedule or placeconcrete during periods that have a high probability of rain or snow. Protect concreteagainst potential rain and frost until it has cured sufficiently to the satisfaction of theOwner Representative.2.2.1.2. When concrete is to be placed in cold weather, have all materials and equipmentneeded for adequate protection and curing on hand and ready for use before concreteplacement is started. Obtain prior authorization from the Owner Representative for theproposed enclosures, equipment, and procedures for cold weather concreting.2.2.1.3. Do not place concrete against any surface that has a temperature of less than 5˚C.Remove all snow and ice. Preheat such surfaces for 24 hours or as required to obtainsurface temperatures of 5˚C minimum, whichever is longer, prior to placing concrete.2.2.1.4. Design and construct heating and hoarding protection measures including heatedenclosures, coverings, insulation, or a suitable combination of these methods inaccordance with CAN / CSA-A23.1.2.2.1.5. Inspect heating and hoarding measures at least every four hours and verify thatenclosures, coverings, and insulation are in place, there is adequate heater fuel, and thespecified temperatures are being maintained.2.2.1.6. Provide a sufficient number of adequately sized and properly vented heaters. Do notplace heaters at locations that may cause rapid drying of freshly placed concrete. Usefans to constantly circulate warm air within the enclosure. Do not use tiger torches orother open flame burners as heaters.2.2.2. Hot Weather Placement2.2.2.1. Hot weather requirements apply when the air temperature is at or above 25˚C, or isforecast to rise to 25˚C within 24 hours of placement.2.2.2.2. Protect formwork, reinforcement, and concrete equipment from the direct rays of thesun, or cool by fogging and evaporation. Dampen subgrade surfaces prior to concreteplacement.2.2.2.3. Provide adequate personnel and equipment to transport, place, consolidate, and finishthe concrete at the fastest possible rate. Obtain prior authorization from the OwnerRepresentative for the proposed equipment and procedures for hot weather concreting.2.2.2.4. Provide protection from drying in accordance with CAN / CSA-A23.1.3. Excavating, Trenching and Backfilling3.1. GENERAL3.1.1. Limitations of Open Trench3.1.1.1. All backfilling procedures shall be carried out as promptly as possible behind pipelaying. Under no circumstances shall an inactive open trench be open for more than 5Days unless otherwise approved by the Contract Administrator. In addition, no morethan one Block may remain un-backfilled at any given time, unless approved inadvance by the Contract Administrator.3.1.1.2. The use of road plates to cover excavations and restore travel lanes is generally notpermitted. Where construction necessitates their use, a letter signed by an Engineermust be submitted ensuring the installation is safe and that the plate will support H-20traffic loading. Plates need to be properly secured (either pinned or recessed into thepavement) and feathered a minimum 300mm with existing road asphalt. Plates need toextend a minimum 300mm beyond the trench, and any pavement damage related tothe plate installation will need to be repaired.3.1.2. Permits and Approvals3.1.2.1. Conduct a Condition Survey with the Contract Administrator prior to commencingany excavation unless otherwise directed by the Owner Representative.3.1.3. Measurement and Payment3.1.3.1. Unless otherwise noted in the Contract Documents, payment for trench excavation byhand (hand dig) or hydro-vacuum excavation will be incidental to payment for Workdescribed in other Sections.3.1.3.2. Unless otherwise noted in the Contract Documents, payment for all charges or feesrelated to inspection from third-party utility companies and / or external authorities /agencies will be incidental to payment for Work described in other Sections3.1.3.3. Payment for additional paving, including saw-cutting, removal of existing asphalt andbase, and preparation of new base shall be made as per the relevant unit price item asindicated in the Schedule of Quantities and Prices.Payment for additional paving connected to mainline trench pavement repair shall bepaid using the lowest unit rate in the Schedule of Quantities and Prices.3.1.3.4. Unless otherwise noted in the Contract Documents, payment for all costs incurred toobtain professional geotechnical services will be incidental to payment for Workdescribed in other Sections.3.1.3.5. Unless otherwise noted in the Contract Documents, payment for all costs of verticaltrench timbering or sheeting protection will be incidental to payment for Workdescribed in other Sections.3.1.4. Inspection and Testing3.1.4.1. Sources and gradation curves for backfill materials must be submitted to the ContractAdministrator at least two weeks prior to construction. Material samples are requiredif requested by the Owner Representative.3.1.4.2. Compaction tests will be performed as outlined in the Contract Documents andapproved by the Owner Representative. Separate compaction tests at each depth arenot required at the same station if storm and sanitary sewers are in a common trench.3.1.4.3. The Contractor shall ensure all compaction test results (for all failed and passed tests)and test certificates are submitted to the Contract Administrator within 48 hours.Compaction test results shall be submitted by third parties to the ContractAdministrator.3.2. PRODUCTS3.2.1. Use of Specified Materials3.2.1.1. Backfill for over-excavated trench to be one of the following, as indicated in theContract Documents or as directed by the Owner Representative:3.2.1.1.1. 75mm Minus Crushed Tailings (City of Vancouver Aggregate #13).3.2.1.1.2. 19mm Minus Combined Crushed Aggregate Fill (Mulch) (City of VancouverAggregate #9).3.2.1.1.3. 19mm Clear Drain Rock (City of Vancouver Aggregate #7) (for waterworks only– only where approved by the Owner Representative).3.2.1.1.4. 20mm Clear Crushed Aggregate (City of Vancouver Aggregate #15) (forwaterworks only – only where approved by the Owner Representative).3.2.1.1.5. 25mm Minus Combined Crushed Recycled Aggregate (City of VancouverAggregate #30) (for sewers only).3.2.1.2. Backfill for trenches and excavations to be one of the following, as indicated in theContract Documents or as directed by the Owner Representative:3.2.1.2.1. Approved granular native material:3.2.1.2.1.1. Native silts and / or clay materials shall not be used3.2.1.2.1.2. Native granular materials (primarily sand) are permissible for backfillingup to 1.2m below the finished grade. All approved native granularmaterials shall be compacted to the minimum densities in 3.5.4 of thisSection. In addition to the compaction requirements, the granular nativematerial must be proven to be stable enough to provide a good foundationfor the lifts of granular base on top. The acceptance of certain nativegranular materials will be at the sole discretion of the OwnerRepresentative. The Owner Representative may also impose additionalacceptance requirements as deemed necessary for the use of approvednative granular material.3.2.1.2.2. Granular or Sand Backfill:3.2.1.2.2.1. Use imported granular fill materials as per SECTION 31 05 17 of the Cityof Vancouver Construction Specifications unless otherwise specified orapproved by the Owner Representative.3.2.1.2.3. Controlled Density Fill3.2.1.2.3.1. Controlled density fill shall meet the requirements in Section 31 23 23Controlled Density Fill.3.2.1.2.3.2. Backfill material shall be free of large stones and or frozen material.3.3. EXECUTION3.3.1. Site Preparation3.3.1.1. The Contractor shall continuously cut existing pavement to its full depth along neatstraight lines with a cutting tool to confine the width of the pavement to be disturbed.The Contractor shall not disturb the pavement beyond the maximum trench widthdefined on the Drawings or contained herein, or unless approved otherwise by theOwner Representative.3.3.2. Stockpiling3.3.2.1. Do not block curb and gutter drainage with granular materials.3.3.3. Excavation3.3.3.1. Excavations shall be to the alignment and grades shown on the Drawings and as set inthe field by the construction survey. Vertical walls on all trenches shall be maintained.If, in the opinion of the Contract Administrator, it is impossible or impractical tomaintain vertical walls for certain sewer trenches, a “Y” type of excavation will bepermitted to a point 300mm above the top of the pipe; trench walls below this pointshall be maintained vertical using appropriate shoring methods.3.3.3.2. For pipe bedding, the Contractor shall over excavate the trench as per Standard DetailDrawing G4.2, G4.3 and G4.4 or as specified herein or on the Drawings. If the bottomof the excavation extends beyond the required depth, the over-excavation shall berefilled at the Contractor’s expense with approved compacted granular material. Theuse of trench digging machinery will be permitted except where its operations willcause damage to trees, buildings, existing utilities, or existing structures above orbelow ground. At such locations, hand methods shall be employed to avoid suchdamage.3.3.3.3. Vertical trench timbering or sheeting shall be placed in accordance with therequirements of WorkSafeBC or as may be necessary to protect life and propertyadjacent to or on the Site. The Contractor shall be responsible for the adequacy of suchbracing and shoring. Unless otherwise accepted by the Contract Administrator, or asWorkSafeBC Rules and Regulations dictate, vertical trench timbering or sheeting shallbe placed so as not to extend below the springline of the largest pipe. No timbering orsheeting shall be left in without the written approval of the Owner Representative, andwhen removed, the void left by the raised sheeting shall be backfilled and thoroughlycompacted.3.3.4. Backfill and Compaction3.3.4.1. Care must be exercised in selecting compaction equipment. In City Streets, there aremany utilities with service connections that are susceptible to damage. The use of drophammer type compactors and large vibrating rollers shall not be allowed, except underspecial conditions approved by the Owner Representative. The Contractor shallassume all responsibility for costs / damages caused to any existing utility.3.3.4.2. All backfilling shall be controlled. The final acceptance to use the backfill methodshall be at the sole discretion of the Owner Representative. No claim shall be made forthe proposed backfill method being unaccepted.3.3.4.3. Backfill materials shall be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 300mm in loosethickness, 200mm for approved granular native material, and compacted to specifieddensities unless otherwise specified or allowed by the Owner Representative.4. Aggregates and Granular Materials4.1. PRODUCTS4.1.1. General4.1.1.1. Approved Granulars, as referenced in the Standard Detail Drawings, refers to 2.2, 2.3,2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11, and 2.13 of this Section.4.1.2. Native Material4.1.2.1. Granular native material may be used only with the express written permission of theOwner Representative, and provided it can be compacted to the requirement stated.All costs for Quality Control testing of granular native materials shall be covered bythe Contractor.4.1.2.2. The Owner Representative may require analytical laboratory confirmation that thenative materials meet the applicable BC Ministry of Environment land use standards(residential or industrial).4.1.3. Native Material5. Granular Subbase5.1. PRODUCTS5.1.1. Specified Materials5.1.1.1. Pit Run Gravel as per SECTION 31 05 17 of the City of Vancouver ConstructionSpecifications.5.1.1.2. 75mm Minus Crushed Tailings as per SECTION 31 05 17 of the City of VancouverConstruction Specifications.5.1.1.3. Granular Native Material as per SECTION 31 05 17 of the City of VancouverConstruction Specifications.5.1.1.4. Sand Fill as per SECTION 31 05 17 of the City of Vancouver ConstructionSpecifications.6. Granular Base6.1. PRODUCTS6.1.1. Granular Base6.1.1.1. 19mm Minus Combined Crushed Aggregate Fill as per SECTION 31 05 17 of the Cityof Vancouver Construction Specifications.Appendix B - SchedulingWESBROOK MALL REDESIGN - PHASE 4Project Start 13-Sep-21Project End 21-Mar-[binary] ID Component WBS # WBS Line Item Complete Duration (days) Start End Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 801 Underpass 1 Tunnel 361 13-Sep-21 9-Sep-222 Underpass 1.1 Site Delivery yes 200 13-Sep-21 1-Apr-223 Underpass 1.1.1 Survey yes 39 14-Sep-21 23-Oct-214 Underpass 1.1.1.1 Subsurface Investigation yes 7 14-Sep-21 21-Sep-215 Underpass 1.1.1.2 Geotechnical Report yes 7 22-Sep-21 29-Sep-216 Underpass 1.1.1.3 Ground Behavior, Control yes 7 30-Sep-21 7-Oct-217 Underpass 1.1.1.4 Third-Party Impacts yes 7 8-Oct-21 15-Oct-218 Underpass 1.1.1.5 Hazards Investigation yes 7 16-Oct-21 23-Oct-219 Underpass 1.1.2 Preliminary Design yes 40 24-Oct-21 3-Dec-2110 Underpass 1.1.2.1 Project Layout yes 8 25-Oct-21 2-Nov-2111 Underpass 1.1.2.2 Excavation Planning yes 7 3-Nov-21 10-Nov-2112 Underpass 1.1.2.3 Construction Method Selection yes 7 11-Nov-21 18-Nov-2113 Underpass 1.1.2.4 Mapping and Engineering yes 14 19-Nov-21 3-Dec-2114 Underpass 1.1.3 Detailed Design no 118 4-Dec-21 1-Apr-2215 Underpass 1.1.3.1 Finalize Design no 39 4-Dec-21 12-Jan-2216 Underpass 1.1.3.2 Final Feasibility Study no 39 12-Jan-22 20-Feb-2217 Underpass 1.1.3.3 Preconstruction Engineering no 39 20-Feb-22 1-Apr-2218 Underpass 1.2 Drawings Approval no 56 4-Apr-22 30-May-2219 Underpass 1.2.1 Documents no 19 4-Apr-22 22-Apr-2220 Underpass 1.2.1.1 Design Memo no 7 4-Apr-22 11-Apr-2221 Underpass 1.2.1.2 Construction Documents no 7 11-Apr-22 18-Apr-2222 Underpass 1.2.1.3 Engineering Review no 7 18-Apr-22 25-Apr-2223 Underpass 1.2.1.4 Specifications no 7 25-Apr-22 2-May-2224 Underpass 1.2.2 Public Engagement no 19 22-Apr-22 11-May-2225 Underpass 1.2.2.1 Environmental Review no 7 22-Apr-22 29-Apr-2226 Underpass 1.2.2.2 Stakeholder Consultation no 7 29-Apr-22 6-May-2227 Underpass 1.2.2.3 Public Hearings no 5 6-May-22 11-May-2228 Underpass 1.2.3 Bidding no 19 11-May-22 30-May-2229 Underpass 1.2.3.1 Bid packages no 7 11-May-22 18-May-2230 Underpass 1.2.3.2 Project Information Systems no 4 14-May-22 18-May-2231 Underpass 1.2.3.3 Bid Review and Selection no 11 18-May-22 29-May-2232 Underpass 1.3 Mobilization no 7 30-May-22 6-Jun-2233 Underpass 1.3.1 Procurement no 2 30-May-22 1-Jun-2234 Underpass 1.3.1.1 Bill of Quantities no 2 30-May-22 1-Jun-2235 Underpass 1.3.1.2 Machinery no 2 30-May-22 1-Jun-2236 Underpass 1.3.1.3 Utility and Safety Equipment no 2 30-May-22 1-Jun-2237 Underpass 1.3.2 Fabricate Structural Elements no 7 30-May-22 6-Jun-2238 Underpass 1.3.2.1 Fabricate Floor Slab no 2 30-May-22 1-Jun-2239 Underpass 1.3.3 Site Preparation no 2 6-Jun-22 8-Jun-2240 Underpass 1.3.3.1 Utility Relocation no 2 6-Jun-22 8-Jun-2241 Underpass 1.3.3.2 Staging Area no 2 6-Jun-22 8-Jun-2242 Underpass 1.3.3.3 Backup Systems no 2 6-Jun-22 8-Jun-2243 Underpass 1.4 Construction no 88 9-Jun-22 5-Sep-2244 Underpass 1.4.1 Excavation no 21 9-Jun-22 30-Jun-2245 Underpass 1.4.1.1 Cut and Cover no 21 9-Jun-22 30-Jun-2246 Underpass 1.4.2 Support no 7 30-Jun-22 7-Jul-2247 Underpass 1.4.2.1 Support Columns no 7 30-Jun-22 7-Jul-2248 Underpass 1.4.2.2 Temporary Lining no 7 30-Jun-22 7-Jul-2249 Underpass 1.4.3 Lining no 38 7-Jul-22 14-Aug-2250 Underpass 1.4.3.1 Lining Segments Staged no 19 7-Jul-22 26-Jul-2251 Underpass 1.4.3.2 Floor Slab Installed no 19 7-Jul-22 26-Jul-2252 Underpass 1.4.3.3 Support Walls Installed no 19 26-Jul-22 14-Aug-2253 Underpass 1.4.3.4 Ceiling Slab Installed no 19 26-Jul-22 14-Aug-2254 Underpass 1.4.3.5 Entrance/Exit Staircase Installed no 19 26-Jul-22 14-Aug-2255 Underpass 1.4.4 Finishing no 21 15-Aug-22 5-Sep-2256 Underpass 1.4.4.1 Concrete Protective Coating Applied no 13 15-Aug-22 28-Aug-2257 Underpass 1.4.4.2 Guardrail Cast In no 13 15-Aug-22 28-Aug-2258 Underpass 1.4.4.3 Stormwater Drainage System Installed no 13 15-Aug-22 28-Aug-2259 Underpass 1.4.4.4 Lighting System Installed no 7 29-Aug-22 5-Sep-2260 Underpass 1.4.4.5 Fire Suppression System Installed no 7 29-Aug-22 5-Sep-2261 Underpass 1.4.4.6 Security System Installed no 7 29-Aug-22 5-Sep-2262 Underpass 1.5 Closing no 25 5-Sep-22 30-Sep-2263 Underpass 1.5.1 Testing no 7 5-Sep-22 12-Sep-2264 Underpass 1.5.1.1 Test Safety Systems no 7 5-Sep-22 12-Sep-2265 Underpass 1.5.1.2 Certifications no 7 5-Sep-22 12-Sep-2266 Underpass 1.5.2 Training no 17 5-Sep-22 22-Sep-2267 Underpass 1.5.2.1 Emergency Operations Training no 17 5-Sep-22 22-Sep-2268 Underpass 1.5.3 Demobilization no 7 23-Sep-22 30-Sep-2269 Underpass 1.5.3.1 Decommission Staging Site no 7 23-Sep-22 30-Sep-2270 Underpass 1.5.3.2 Remove Equipment no 7 23-Sep-22 30-Sep-2271 Underpass 1.5.3.3 Final Paving no 7 23-Sep-22 30-Sep-22ID'[binary] ID Component WBS # WBS Line Item Complete Duration (days) Start End Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 8072 Roadworks 2 Roadworks, Sidewalk, Multi Use Pathway no 553 13-Sep-21 20-Mar-2373 Roadworks 2.1 Site Delivery no 200 13-Sep-21 1-Apr-2274 Roadworks 2.1.1 Survey no 39 14-Sep-21 23-Oct-2175 Roadworks 2.1.1.1 Subsurface Investigation no 7 14-Sep-21 21-Sep-2176 Roadworks 2.1.1.2 Geotechnical Report no 7 22-Sep-21 29-Sep-2177 Roadworks 2.1.1.3 Ground behavior, Control no 7 30-Sep-21 7-Oct-2178 Roadworks 2.1.1.4 Third-Party Impacts no 7 8-Oct-21 15-Oct-2179 Roadworks 2.1.1.5 Hazards Investigation no 7 16-Oct-21 23-Oct-2180 Roadworks 2.1.2 Preliminary Design no 40 24-Oct-21 3-Dec-2181 Roadworks 2.1.2.1 Project Layout no 8 25-Oct-21 2-Nov-2182 Roadworks 2.1.2.2 Excavation Planning no 7 3-Nov-21 10-Nov-2183 Roadworks 2.1.2.3 Construction Method Selection no 7 11-Nov-21 18-Nov-2184 Roadworks 2.1.2.4 Mapping and Engineering no 14 19-Nov-21 3-Dec-2185 Roadworks 2.1.3 Detailed Design no 118 4-Dec-21 1-Apr-2286 Roadworks 2.1.3.1 Finalize Design no 39 4-Dec-21 12-Jan-2287 Roadworks 2.1.3.2 Final Feasibility Study no 39 12-Jan-22 20-Feb-2288 Roadworks 2.1.3.3 Preconstruction Engineering no 39 20-Feb-22 1-Apr-2289 Roadworks 2.2 Drawings Approval no 56 4-Apr-22 30-May-2290 Roadworks 2.2.1 Documents no 19 4-Apr-22 22-Apr-2291 Roadworks 2.2.1.1 Design Memo no 7 4-Apr-22 11-Apr-2292 Roadworks 2.2.1.2 Construction Documents no 7 11-Apr-22 18-Apr-2293 Roadworks 2.2.1.3 Engineering Review no 7 18-Apr-22 25-Apr-2294 Roadworks 2.2.1.4 Specifications no 7 25-Apr-22 2-May-2295 Roadworks 2.2.2 Public Approval no 19 22-Apr-22 11-May-2296 Roadworks 2.2.2.1 Environmental Review no 7 22-Apr-22 29-Apr-2297 Roadworks 2.2.2.2 Stakeholder Consultation no 7 29-Apr-22 6-May-2298 Roadworks 2.2.2.3 Public Hearings no 5 6-May-22 11-May-2299 Roadworks 2.2.3 Bidding no 19 11-May-22 30-May-22100 Roadworks 2.2.3.1 Bid packages no 7 11-May-22 18-May-22101 Roadworks 2.2.3.2 Project Information Systems no 4 14-May-22 18-May-22102 Roadworks 2.2.3.3 Bid Review and Selection no 11 18-May-22 29-May-22103 Roadworks 2.3 Mobilization no 7 30-May-22 6-Jun-22104 Roadworks 2.3.1 Procurement no 4 30-May-22 2-Jun-22105 Roadworks 2.3.1.1 Bill of Quantities no 4 30-May-22 2-Jun-22106 Roadworks 2.3.1.2 Machinery no 4 30-May-22 2-Jun-22107 Roadworks 2.3.1.3 Utility and Safety Equipment no 4 30-May-22 2-Jun-22108 Roadworks 2.3.2 Fabricate Elements no 4 30-May-22 2-Jun-22109 Roadworks 2.3.2.1 Construct Planters no 4 30-May-22 2-Jun-22110 Roadworks 2.3.3 Site Preparation no 7 30-May-22 6-Jun-22111 Roadworks 2.3.3.1 Utility Relocation no 9 30-May-22 8-Jun-22112 Roadworks 2.3.3.2 Staging Area no 9 30-May-22 8-Jun-22113 Roadworks 2.3.3.3 Backup Systems no 9 30-May-22 8-Jun-22114 Roadworks 2.4 Construction no 264 9-Jun-22 28-Feb-23115 Roadworks 2.4.1 Earthworks no 88 9-Jun-22 5-Sep-22116 Roadworks 2.4.1.1 Excavation and Ripping no 88 9-Jun-22 5-Sep-22117 Roadworks 2.4.2 Fill no 176 5-Sep-22 28-Feb-23118 Roadworks 2.4.2.1 Subbase Pavement no 59 5-Sep-22 2-Nov-22119 Roadworks 2.4.2.2 Base Pavement no 59 2-Nov-22 31-Dec-22120 Roadworks 2.4.2.3 Geotextile Placement no 59 31-Dec-22 28-Feb-23121 Roadworks 2.5 Closing no 21 28-Feb-23 21-Mar-23122 Roadworks 2.5.1 Testing no 6 28-Feb-23 6-Mar-23123 Roadworks 2.5.1.1 Asphalt and Concrete Compaction Testing no 7 6-Mar-23 13-Mar-23124 Roadworks 2.5.1.2 Certifications no 7 6-Mar-23 13-Mar-23125 Roadworks 2.5.2 Training no 6 7-Mar-23 13-Mar-23126 Roadworks 2.5.2.1 Emergency Operations Training no 6 7-Mar-23 13-Mar-23127 Roadworks 2.5.3 Demobilization no 7 14-Mar-23 21-Mar-23128 Roadworks 2.5.3.1 Decommission Staging Site no 7 14-Mar-23 21-Mar-23129 Roadworks 2.5.3.2 Remove Equipment no 7 14-Mar-23 21-Mar-23130 Roadworks 2.5.3.3 Final Paving no 7 14-Mar-23 21-Mar-23Appendix C - Class A Cost EstimateWB Mall EstimateQty Line Number Group Description Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output Extended Material Extended Labor Extended Equipment Extended Total Extended Total O&P3727 321123230301 SidewalkBase course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 4" deep B36B S.Y 0.011 6,000.00 19,007.70$ 1,229.91$ 2,497.09$ 22,734.70$ 25,679.03$ 2748 320116715320 Raised Bike LaneCold milling asphalt paving, asphalt pavement, 1” to 3" deep, removal from concrete base, rip, load and sweep, excludes hauling B70 S.Y 0.007 8,000.00 577.08$ 522.12$ 1,099.20$ 1,538.88$ 2748 321216130200 Raised Bike LanePlant-mix asphalt paving, for highways and large paved areas, binder course, 4" thick, no hauling included B25 S.Y 0.021 4,140.00 38,197.20$ 1,703.76$ 1,648.80$ 41,549.76$ 46,661.04$ 3 311313201600 GeneralSelective felling trees and piling, large tract clearing & piling, firm level terrain, no boulders, softwood, per tree, 300 H.P. dozer, 12" to 24” diameter B10M Ea. 0.04 200.00 4.20$ 24.15$ 28.35$ 33.39$ 3 311313202100 GeneralSelective clearing and grubbing, 1-1/2 C.Y. excavator, 14” to 24" diameter, stump removal on site by hydraulic excavator B30 Ea. 0.96 25.00 85.50$ 235.50$ 321.00$ 399.00$ 1386 24113176000 Site PrepDemolish, remove pavement & curb, remove concrete curbs, plain, excludes hauling and disposal fees B6 L.F. 0.067 360.00 2,661.12$ 1,233.54$ 3,894.66$ 5,779.62$ 38 334413131582 Site PrepRELOCATION: Utility Area Drains, catch basins or manholes curb inlet frame, grate, and curb box, large, heavy duty, 24” x 36", excludes footing, excavation, and backfill B24 Ea. 13,870.00$ 13,870.00$ 47,880.00$ 38 24113420400 Site PrepSelective demolition, manholes & catch basins, manhole top, precast 8" thick, 4’-6' dia, excludes excavation B6 Ea. 3 8.00 3,287.00$ 1,520.00$ 4,807.00$ 7,106.00$ 3000 312316130050 Multiuse Path/SidewalkExcavating, trench or continuous footing, common earth, 3/8 C.Y. excavator, 1' to 4' deep, excludes sheeting or dewatering B11C B.C.Y. 0.107 150.00 9,810.00$ 6,420.00$ 16,230.00$ 23,250.00$ 3350 321723130020 General Painted pavement markings, acrylic waterborne, white or yellow, 4" wide B78 L.F. 0.002 20,000.00 636.50$ 167.50$ 67.00$ 871.00$ 1,105.00$ 1 2 General Bus Shelter Relocation A1F Ea. 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 45000 320610100450 Multiuse Path/SidewalkSidewalks, driveways, and patios, sidewalks, concrete, excludes base, for 4" thick bank run gravel base, add B18 S.F. 0.01 2,500.00 22,950.00$ 11,700.00$ 900.00$ 35,550.00$ 45,900.00$ 2005 321613130404 RoadworksCast-in place concrete curbs & gutters, concrete, wood forms, straight 6" x 18", incudes concrete C2A L.F. 0.096 500.00 9,624.00$ 6,235.55$ 15,859.55$ 20,952.25$ 1 265613103000 General REMOVAL: Light poles, anchor base, aluminum, 20' high, excluding concrete bases R3 Ea. 930.00$ 273.00$ 44.50$ 1,247.50$ 1,519.00$ 4320 329226130300 Green InfrastructureSprigging, stolonizing, broadcast, 6 bushels per M.S.F., hydro Green Infrastructure B64 M.S.F. 0.16 100.00 40,500.00$ 9,136.80$ 6,523.20$ 56,160.00$ 66,268.80$ 1370 312316130050 SidewalkExcavating, trench or continuous footing, common earth, 3/8 C.Y. excavator, 1' to 4' deep, excludes sheeting or dewatering B11C B.C.Y. 0.107 150.00 4,479.90$ 2,931.80$ 7,411.70$ 10,617.50$ 1600 320116715200 SidewalkCold milling asphalt paving, 1" to 3" asphalt pavement, over 25,000 S.Y., cold planing & cleaning B71 S.Y. 0.009 6,000.00 448.00$ 1,744.00$ 2,192.00$ 2,672.00$ 1600 321123230301 SidewalkBase course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 4” deep B36B S.Y. 0.011 6,000.00 8,160.00$ 528.00$ 1,072.00$ 9,760.00$ 11,024.00$ 1600 321123230304 SidewalkBase course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 12" deep B36B S.Y. 0.017 3,800.00 24,480.00$ 832.00$ 1,696.00$ 27,008.00$ 30,192.00$ 1600 334626100188 Sidewalk Geotextile Subsurface Drainage Filtration, soil drainage mat on vertical wall, 0.25" thick 2 Clab S.Y. 0.053 300.00 2,464.00$ 2,256.00$ 4,720.00$ 6,480.00$ 1600 334626100188 Sidewalk Geotextile Subsurface Drainage Filtration, soil drainage mat on vertical wall, 0.25" thick 2 Clab S.Y. 0.053 300.00 2,464.00$ 2,256.00$ 4,720.00$ 6,480.00$ 14410 321416100620 Sidewalk Brick paving, bedding, mortar, 2” thick D1 S.F. 0.08 200.00 18,877.10$ 35,016.30$ 53,893.40$ 78,246.00$ 4000 24113175200 SidewalkDemolish, remove pavement & curb, remove concrete, mesh reinforced, to 150 mm thick, hydraulic hammer, excludes hauling and disposal fees B38 S.Y. 0.188 213.00 29,200.00$ 21,400.00$ 50,600.00$ 67,600.00$ 189 347113170900 Green InfrastructureSecurity vehicle barriers, concrete Green Infrastructure, exposed aggregate finish, rectangle, 96" long x 24” wide x 30" high, excludes filling material B11M Ea. 2 8.00 67,567.50$ 5,811.75$ 4,110.75$ 77,490.00$ 88,338.60$ 14210 321123230302 RoadworksBase course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 6" deep B36B S.Y. 0.012 5,400.00 108,706.50$ 5,257.70$ 10,515.40$ 124,479.60$ 139,417.15$ 14210 320116715280 RoadworksCold milling asphalt paving, 1" to 3" asphalt pavement, 5,000 to 10,000 S.Y., cold planing & cleaning B71 S.Y. 0.014 4,000.00 -$ 6,110.30$ 23,304.40$ 29,414.70$ 35,591.79$ 14210 321123230302 RoadworksBase course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 6" deep B36B S.Y. 0.012 5,400.00 108,706.50$ 5,257.70$ 10,515.40$ 124,479.60$ 139,417.15$ 14210 321126130550 RoadworksAsphalt Paving, plant mixed asphaltic base courses for roadways and large paved areas, bituminous concrete, 6" thick B25 S.Y. 0.024 3,700.00 298,410.00$ 9,804.90$ 9,520.70$ 317,735.60$ 352,686.52$ 1 3 Roadworks Consulting and Engineering Fees for Signal Retiming ENG Ea. 3,400.00$ 1,000.00$ 4,400.00$ 4,400.00$ 775,081.00$ 170,999.97$ 110,446.35$ 1,056,527.32$ 1,271,234.72$ Inflation 1.28CPI 1.31Currency 1.28Contingency 1.1Contractor Markup 1.2Bonds and Insurance 1.05Management and Permitting 1.085$4,103,080Underpass Cost EstimateQty Line Number Group Description Crew Unit Labor Hours Daily Output Extended Material Extended Labor Extended Equipment Extended Total Extended Total O&P60 55213500020 Railing, pipe, aluminum, satin finish, 2 rails, 3'-6" high, posts @ 5' O.C., 1-1/4" dia, shop fabricated E4 L.F. 0.2 160 1,890.00$ 444.00$ 40.80$ 2,374.80$ 2,958.00$ 2223 312316420200Excavating, bulk bank measure, 1 C.Y. capacity = 75 C.Y./hour, backhoe, hydraulic, crawler mounted, excluding truck loading B12A B.C.Y. 0.02 800 1,378.26$ 2,022.93$ 3,401.19$ 4,512.69$ 1 282323500400CB 9-S GATEKEEPER ENCLOSURE: Video surveillance, internet protocol (IP) network, day/night, color, includes power supply Ea. 3,000.00$ 124.00$ 3,124.00$ 1,376.00$ 100 33053401900Structural concrete, in place, elevated slab (4000 psi), flat slab with drop panels, 125 psf superimposed load, 20' span, includes forms(4 uses), WTIHOUT REINFORCING STEEL, concrete, placing and finishing C14B C.Y. 23,400.00$ 18,100.00$ 1,985.00$ 43,485.00$ 58,400.00$ 112 33053406800Structural concrete, in place, stairs (3500 psi), 3'-6" wide, free standing, includes forms(4 uses), reinforcing steel, concrete, placing and finishing, WITH safety treads C14H LF Nose 560.00$ 2,576.00$ 31.36$ 3,167.36$ 4,234.72$ 170 312514160060 Synthetic erosion control, nylon, 3 dimensional geomatrix, 9 mil thick B80A S.Y. 0.034 700 289.00$ 154.70$ 52.70$ 496.40$ 634.10$ 7 32110500200 Reinforcing Steel, average price, cut, bent and delivered, A615, grade 40, material only Ton 6,160.00$ 6,160.00$ 6,790.00$ 251 321123230304Base course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 12" deep B36B S.Y. 0.017 3800 3,840.30$ 130.52$ 266.06$ 4,236.88$ 4,736.37$ 20 265623101190 Metal halide fixture, exterior, wall pack, 250 Watt, incl lamps 1 ELECEa. 2 4 5,800.00$ 1,610.00$ 7,410.00$ 9,020.00$ 79 24113176000 Demolish, remove pavement & curb, remove concrete curbs, plain, excludes hauling and disposal fees B6 L.F. 0.067 360 151.68$ 70.31$ 221.99$ 329.43$ 1 210523506320 Sprinkler System Valve Alarm, 8" size, incl. retard chamber, trim, gauges & alarm line strainer Q13 Ea. 10.667 3 1,825.00$ 375.00$ 2,200.00$ 2,615.00$ 1 221123111020 Pump, turbine pump, cast iron, 100 GPM, 3 H.P., 4" discharge Q2 Ea. 25 0.96 8,225.00$ 860.00$ 9,085.00$ 7,150.00$ 1 330516130050 Utility structures, utility vaults precast concrete, excludes excavation and backfill B13 Ea. 2,425.00$ 680.00$ 375.00$ 3,480.00$ 4,210.00$ 2 221319130440 Drain, deck, auto park, cast iron, 13" top, 3", 4", 5" and 6" pipe size Q1 Ea. 2 8 2,250.00$ 143.00$ 2,393.00$ 2,734.00$ 3767 321123230302Base course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 6" deep B36B S.Y. 0.012 5400 28,817.55$ 1,393.79$ 2,787.58$ 32,998.92$ 37,029.61$ 3767 320116715280 Cold milling asphalt paving, 1" to 3" asphalt pavement, 5,000 to 10,000 S.Y., cold planing & cleaning B71 S.Y. 0.014 4000 1,619.81$ 6,177.88$ 7,797.69$ 9,417.50$ 3767 321123230302Base course drainage layers, aggregate base course for roadways and large paved areas, crushed stone base, compacted, crushed 1-1/2" stone base, to 6" deep B36B S.Y. 0.012 5400 28,817.55$ 1,393.79$ 2,787.58$ 32,998.92$ 37,029.61$ 3767 321126130550Asphalt Paving, plant mixed asphaltic base courses for roadways and large paved areas, bituminous concrete, 6" thick B25 S.Y. 0.024 3700 79,107.00$ 2,599.23$ 2,523.89$ 84,230.12$ 93,722.96$ 3000 312323200044Cycle hauling(wait, load,travel, unload or dump & return) time per cycle, excavated or borrow, loose cubic yards, 10 min wait/load/unload, 8 C.Y. truck, cycle 4 miles, 25 MPH, excludes loading equipment B34A L.C.Y. 0.042 192 3,390.00$ 4,920.00$ 8,310.00$ 11,070.00$ 196,406.40$ 37,123.78$ 24,041.09$ 257,571.27$ 297,969.99$ Inflation 1.376Currency 1.28Contingency 1.2Contractor Markup 1.2Bonds and Insurance 1.05Management and Permitting 1.085Adjusted Cost 860,958.98$ Appendix D - Traffic ModelingLanes, Volumes, Timings 2050 AM BASE MODEL3: Thunderbird Boulevard & Wesbrook Mall 2021-11-30AM_2018_Base_Model 2021-10-08 Baseline Synchro 6 ReportUniversity of British Columbia Page 1Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (m) 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 3.5 3.3Storage Length (m) 60.0 40.0 0.0 30.0 110.0 0.0 50.0 12.0Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (m) 6.5 6.5 1.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 1.5Trailing Detector (m) 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.0Turning Speed (k/h) 25 15 25 15 25 15 25 15Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.89 0.79 0.84 0.97 0.94 0.87 0.82Frt 0.850 0.982 0.932 0.850Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1632 1801 1531 1750 1853 0 1750 1574 0 1671 1842 1531Flt Permitted 0.449 0.680 0.247 0.154Satd. Flow (perm) 684 1801 1210 1056 1853 0 428 1574 0 271 1842 1250Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 88 10 78 106Headway Factor 1.11 1.04 1.04 1.01 0.94 1.01 1.01 0.94 1.01 1.08 1.01 1.04Link Speed (k/h) 50 50 50 50Link Distance (m) 153.9 112.5 755.2 92.2Travel Time (s) 11.1 8.1 54.4 6.6Volume (vph) 101 79 52 129 150 33 359 417 229 45 339 211Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 133 193 193 133 92 100 100 92Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 39 42 52 7Peak Hour Factor 0.69 0.66 0.59 0.64 0.55 0.86 0.86 0.84 0.56 0.75 0.83 0.81Parking (#/hr) 0Adj. Flow (vph) 146 120 88 202 273 38 417 496 409 60 408 260Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 120 88 202 311 0 417 905 0 60 408 260Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm PermProtected Phases 4 8 5 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 6Detector Phases 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 6 6 6Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Minimum Split (s) 31.3 31.3 31.3 33.3 33.3 12.5 21.9 28.9 28.9 28.9Total Split (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 0.0 16.0 46.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Total Split (%) 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 42.5% 0.0% 20.0% 57.5% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5%Maximum Green (s) 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 27.7 9.5 40.1 24.1 24.1 24.1Yellow Time (s) 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6All-Red Time (s) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-MinWalk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 9.0 16.0 16.0 16.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 49.2 49.2 28.6 28.6 28.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.62 0.62 0.36 0.36 0.36Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2050 AM BASE MODEL3: Thunderbird Boulevard & Wesbrook Mall 2021-11-30AM_2018_Base_Model 2021-10-08 Baseline Synchro 6 ReportUniversity of British Columbia Page 2Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.75 0.23 0.22 0.67 0.58 0.78 0.91 0.62 0.62 0.50Control Delay 47.9 21.0 5.6 35.4 27.1 24.5 29.9 55.6 27.2 16.6Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 47.9 21.0 5.6 35.4 27.1 24.5 29.9 55.6 27.2 16.6LOS D C A D C C C E C BApproach Delay 28.3 30.4 28.2 25.8Approach LOS C C C CQueue Length 50th (m) 20.8 14.4 0.0 28.0 40.4 31.2 108.5 8.2 55.9 19.0Queue Length 95th (m) 26.3 17.1 2.5 28.8 30.7 #87.7 #200.2 #22.0 78.1 35.1Internal Link Dist (m) 129.9 88.5 731.2 68.2Turn Bay Length (m) 60.0 40.0 110.0 50.0 12.0Base Capacity (vph) 257 675 509 396 701 538 998 97 659 515Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.18 0.17 0.51 0.44 0.78 0.91 0.62 0.62 0.50Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 16 (20%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of GreenNatural Cycle: 90Control Type: Actuated-CoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 0.91Intersection Signal Delay: 28.0 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 87.9% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 3: Thunderbird Boulevard & Wesbrook MallLanes, Volumes, Timings 2050 PM BASE MODEL3: Thunderbird Boulevard & Wesbrook Mall 2021-11-30AM_2018_Base_Model 2021-10-08 Baseline Synchro 6 ReportUniversity of British Columbia Page 1Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Lane Width (m) 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.1 3.5 3.3Storage Length (m) 60.0 40.0 0.0 30.0 110.0 0.0 50.0 12.0Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Leading Detector (m) 6.5 6.5 1.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 1.5Trailing Detector (m) 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.0Turning Speed (k/h) 25 15 25 15 25 15 25 15Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Ped Bike Factor 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.94 0.91 0.63Frt 0.850 0.955 0.966 0.850Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950Satd. Flow (prot) 1632 1801 1531 1750 1745 0 1750 1709 0 1671 1842 1531Flt Permitted 0.575 0.673 0.138 0.196Satd. Flow (perm) 856 1801 1327 1128 1745 0 254 1709 0 345 1842 960Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes YesSatd. Flow (RTOR) 17 30 21 41Headway Factor 1.11 1.04 1.04 1.01 0.94 1.01 1.01 0.94 1.01 1.08 1.01 1.04Link Speed (k/h) 50 50 50 50Link Distance (m) 153.9 112.5 755.2 92.2Travel Time (s) 11.1 8.1 54.4 6.6Volume (vph) 325 71 278 110 57 34 110 359 97 52 539 124Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 121 113 113 121 193 149 149 193Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 43 11 14 35Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.54 0.85 0.75 0.55 0.78 0.81 0.89 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.76Parking (#/hr) 0Adj. Flow (vph) 387 131 327 147 104 44 136 403 120 66 700 163Lane Group Flow (vph) 387 131 327 147 148 0 136 523 0 66 700 163Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2 6Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 6Detector Phases 7 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Minimum Split (s) 12.5 31.3 31.3 33.3 33.3 21.9 21.9 28.9 28.9 28.9Total Split (s) 13.0 47.0 47.0 34.0 34.0 0.0 33.0 33.0 0.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Total Split (%) 16.3% 58.8% 58.8% 42.5% 42.5% 0.0% 41.3% 41.3% 0.0% 41.3% 41.3% 41.3%Maximum Green (s) 6.5 40.7 40.7 27.7 27.7 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1 27.1Yellow Time (s) 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6All-Red Time (s) 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3Lead/Lag Lead Lag LagLead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes YesVehicle Extension (s) 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Recall Mode None None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-MinWalk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0Flash Dont Walk (s) 18.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 9.0 9.0 16.0 16.0 16.0Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Act Effct Green (s) 30.1 30.1 30.1 17.1 17.1 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.21 0.21 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2050 PM BASE MODEL3: Thunderbird Boulevard & Wesbrook Mall 2021-11-30AM_2018_Base_Model 2021-10-08 Baseline Synchro 6 ReportUniversity of British Columbia Page 2Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRv/c Ratio 0.95 0.19 0.64 0.61 0.37 1.02 0.58 0.36 0.73 0.31Control Delay 55.7 16.2 24.8 38.3 22.5 112.3 17.1 21.5 22.3 11.5Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total Delay 55.7 16.2 24.8 38.3 22.5 112.3 17.1 21.5 22.3 11.5LOS E B C D C F B C C BApproach Delay 37.6 30.4 36.7 20.3Approach LOS D C D CQueue Length 50th (m) 49.8 13.9 40.1 21.5 16.1 ~21.6 50.9 5.8 80.2 10.0Queue Length 95th (m) #64.6 12.3 52.8 28.7 14.9 #54.1 97.6 16.7 114.2 21.2Internal Link Dist (m) 129.9 88.5 731.2 68.2Turn Bay Length (m) 60.0 40.0 110.0 50.0 12.0Base Capacity (vph) 409 968 721 423 673 133 905 181 965 523Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.14 0.45 0.35 0.22 1.02 0.58 0.36 0.73 0.31Intersection SummaryArea Type: OtherCycle Length: 80Actuated Cycle Length: 80Offset: 16 (20%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of GreenNatural Cycle: 90Control Type: Actuated-CoordinatedMaximum v/c Ratio: 1.02Intersection Signal Delay: 30.7 Intersection LOS: CIntersection Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.Splits and Phases: 3: Thunderbird Boulevard & Wesbrook MallLANE SUMMARYSite: 103 [16th Avenue (Site Folder: 2021_AM_MODEL)]New SiteSite Category: 2021_AM_BASERoundaboutLane Use and PerformanceDEMAND FLOWS95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg.SatnLaneUtil.Aver.DelayLevel ofServiceLane ConfigLane LengthCap.Adj.Prob. Block.[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec m m % %South: Wesbrook MallLane 1d 809 2.9 1150 0.703 100 3.1 LOS A 6.6 47.2 Full 37 0.0 12.4Approach 809 2.9 0.703 3.1 LOS A 6.6 47.2East: 16th AvenueLane 1 118 0.0 744 0.158 100 11.2 LOS B 1.1 7.4 Full 169 0.0 0.0Lane 2d 146 13.0 923 0.158 100 5.9 LOS A 1.2 9.0 Full 169 0.0 0.0Approach 264 7.2 0.158 8.2 LOS A 1.2 9.0North: Wesbrook MallLane 1d 319 29.7 960 0.333 100 7.0 LOS A 1.7 14.6 Full 538 0.0 0.0Lane 2 168 2.9 890 0.189 575 4.5 LOS A 0.8 6.0 Full 538 0.0 0.0Approach 487 20.4 0.333 6.1 LOS A 1.7 14.6West: 16th AvenueLane 1 98 0.0 1027 0.096 975 4.5 LOS A 0.6 3.9 Full 285 0.0 0.0Lane 2d 109 28.4 1105 0.098 100 9.5 LOS A 0.6 5.1 Full 285 0.0 0.0Approach 207 14.9 0.098 7.1 LOS A 0.6 5.1Intersection1767 9.8 0.703 5.2 LOS A 6.6 47.2Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (SIDRA). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).Roundabout LOS Method: SIDRA Roundabout LOS.Lane LOS values are based on average delay per lane.Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes.Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).Queue Model: SIDRA Standard.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.5 Lane under-utilisation found by the programd Dominant lane on roundabout approachApproach Lane Flows (veh/h)South: Wesbrook MallMov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HVCap.veh/hDeg.Satnv/cLaneUtil.%Prob.SL Ov.%Ov.LaneNo.From S To Exit: W N ELane 1 283 344 181 809 2.9 1150 0.703 100 NA NAApproach 283 344 181 809 2.9 0.703East: 16th AvenueMov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HVCap.veh/hDeg.Satnv/cLaneUtil.%Prob.SL Ov.%Ov.LaneNo.From E To Exit: S W NLane 1 102 16 - 118 0.0 744 0.158 100 NA NALane 2 - 102 44 146 13.0 923 0.158 100 NA NAApproach 102 117 44 264 7.2 0.158North: Wesbrook MallMov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HVCap.veh/hDeg.Satnv/cLaneUtil.%Prob.SL Ov.%Ov.LaneNo.From N To Exit: E S WLane 1 51 268 - 319 29.7 960 0.333 100 NA NALane 2 - - 168 168 2.9 890 0.189 575 NA NAApproach 51 268 168 487 20.4 0.333West: 16th AvenueMov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HVCap.veh/hDeg.Satnv/cLaneUtil.%Prob.SL Ov.%Ov.LaneNo.From W To Exit: N E SLane 1 - 58 40 98 0.0 1027 0.096 975 NA NALane 2 109 - - 109 28.4 1105 0.098 100 NA NAApproach 109 58 40 207 14.9 0.098Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)Intersection 1767 9.8 0.703Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.5 Lane under-utilisation found by the programMerge AnalysisExitLaneNumberShortLaneLengthPercentOpng inLaneOpposingFlow RateCriticalGapFollow-upHeadwayLaneFlowRateCapacity Deg.SatnMin.DelayMergeDelaym % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec secSouth Exit: Wesbrook MallMerge Type: Not AppliedFull Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.East Exit: 16th AvenueMerge Type: Not AppliedFull Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.Full Length Lane 2 Merge Analysis not applied.North Exit: Wesbrook MallMerge Type: Not AppliedFull Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.West Exit: 16th AvenueMerge Type: Not AppliedFull Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.Full Length Lane 2 Merge Analysis not applied.SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLOMBIA CIVIL ENGINEERING | Licence: EDU NETWORK / Special | Processed: November 28, 2021 4:01:58 PMProject: C:\Users\2josh\OneDrive - The University Of British Columbia\CIVL 445\Sidra\2021 AM Model.sip9Appendix E - Underpass Design Load CalculationsAppendix F - Pump Design CalculationsHead Requirement - 8 metersFlow Requirement - 10mm/hr * (4m * 35m) Underpass Plan View Dim. = 25 GPM● Based on 1 in 100 year hourly rainfall at UBC Vancouver above underpass● Groundwater water table 45 meters below surface (no influence)Pump Curve and System Curve - Selected Pump MODEL NS 4-23 CVBPSource: https://product-selection.grundfos.com/Operating Point SummaryTarget Flow = 25 GPM or 1.57 L/sTarget Head Clearance = 7.1 metersOperating Point = 26.7 GPM at 9.1 meters of headAppendix G - Settlement Calculations
Report
eng
Unreviewed
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Undergraduate
UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report
University of British Columbia. CIVL 446
Wesbrook Mall Phase 4 Redesign
Text