Applied Science, Faculty of
Civil Engineering, Department of
DSpace
University of British Columbia. Department of Civil Engineering
University of British Columbia. Campus and Community Planning
Orr, Benny
Su, Davis
Barkh, Hamed
Qiu, Colleen
Inoda, Shota
Luo, Melissa
The following report contains a detailed design summary report for the UBC East Mall Redesign from Stadium Road to Agronomy Road with tie ins into the planned Stadium Neighbourhood. The project’s objectives are to: (1) maximize safety, (2) minimize cost, (3) increase active mode share, (4) calm traffic, (5) increase green space to improve stormwater retention, (6) tie-in with the proposed Stadium Neighbourhood alignment, and (7) accommodate the sports field’s high pick-up / drop-off (PUDO) demand. The following document is a summary of the detailed design including a design overview, issue-for-construction drawings, cost estimate, schedule, life cycle analysis, and maintenance. The selected design includes raised bike lanes, parking lane changes, rain gardens, curb extensions, and crosswalk upgrades along East Mall and a cantilevered steel walkway along Agronomy Road. The key considerations for the design have remained the same throughout the duration of the project, namely: client objectives, design feasibility, and stakeholder feedback. To arrive at the detailed design the following analyses were conducted: traffic analyses to inform the geometric design, a structural analysis for the walkway, stormwater analysis for rain gardens, and a life cycle analysis for determining the optimal service-life maintenance plan. The detailed design has a Class A cost estimate of $3,578,000 and the project is on track to be constructed between May 10th and is expected to be completed by February 1st 2022 with a median time to completion of 186 work days excluding weekends and holidays. The project’s next steps include tendering the project and obtaining relevant permits and approvals. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
East Mall Redesign - Final Detailed Design Report Prepared by: Benny Orr, Davis Su, Hamed Barkh, Colleen Qiu, Shota Inoda, Melissa Luo Prepared for: Course Code: CIVL 446 University of British Columbia Date: 20 April 2021 Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student research project and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore, readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Sustainability Program representative about the current status of the subject matter of a report”. University of British Columbia Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report East Mall Redesign – Final Detailed Design Report Benny Orr, Davis Su, Hamed Barkh, Colleen Qiu, Shota Inoda, Melissa Luo University of British Columbia CIVL 446 April 20, 2021 Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student research project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore, readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Sustainability Program representative about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report”. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe following report contains a detailed design summary report for the UBC East Mall Redesignfrom Stadium Road to Agronomy Road with tie ins into the planned Stadium Neighbourhood.The project’s objectives are to: (1) maximize safety, (2) minimize cost, (3) increase active modeshare, (4) calm traffic, (5) increase green space to improve stormwater retention, (6) tie-in withthe proposed Stadium Neighbourhood alignment, and (7) accommodate the sports field’s highpick-up / drop-off (PUDO) demand.The following document is a summary of the detailed design including a design overview,issue-for-construction drawings, cost estimate, schedule, life cycle analysis, and maintenance.The selected design includes raised bike lanes, parking lane changes, rain gardens, curbextensions, and crosswalk upgrades along East Mall and a cantilevered steel walkway alongAgronomy Road. The key considerations for the design have remained the same throughout theduration of the project, namely: client objectives, design feasibility, and stakeholder feedback. Toarrive at the detailed design the following analyses were conducted: traffic analyses to informthe geometric design, a structural analysis for the walkway, stormwater analysis for raingardens, and a life cycle analysis for determining the optimal service-life maintenance plan.The detailed design has a Class A cost estimate of $3,578,000 and the project is on track to beconstructed between May 10th and is expected to be completed by February 1st 2022 with amedian time to completion of 186 work days excluding weekends and holidays. The project’snext steps include tendering the project and obtaining relevant permits and approvals.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 1TABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1TABLE OF CONTENTS 2LIST OF APPENDICES 4LIST OF FIGURES 4LIST OF TABLES 41.0 INTRODUCTION 61.1 Project Background 61.2 Team Member Contribution 72.0 ROADWAY DESIGN 82.1 Standards and Software Used 82.2 Design Criteria 92.3 Technical Considerations and Design Rationale 102.3.1 Plan Drawing Components 102.3.2 Profile Drawing Components 142.3.3 Section Drawing Components 142.4 Traffic Analysis 152.5 Key Components Description 173.0 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE 203.1 Standards and Software 203.2 Design Targets 213.3 Rainfall Analysis 213.3 Evapotranspiration Analysis 223.4 Groundwater Analysis 233.5 Plants and Soil 233.6 Overland Flow 243.7 Design Description 253.7.1 Design Layout 253.7.2 Pipeline System 263.8 Stormwater Model 273.7.1 Design Model Input and Parameters 273.7.2 PCSWMM Results 284.0 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY 29UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 24.1 Design Standards and Criteria 294.2 Site Location 304.3 Key Component Description 314.4 Structural Analysis and Design Checks 324.5 Construction Specifications 334.6 Special Fabrication Requirements 335.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 355.1 Site Plan and Anticipated Issues 355.1.1 East Mall Construction 355.1.2 Pedestrian Walkway Construction 375.1.3 Traffic Management Plan 385.2 Cost Estimate and Quantity Take-Off 385.2.1 Capital Costs 385.2.2 Life Cycle Costs and Present Worth 405.3 Schedule 415.4 Service-life and Maintenance Plan 425.4.1 Roadway 425.4.2 Rain Garden 475.4.3 Walkway 476.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 486.1 Summary 486.2 Recommendations and Next Steps 487.0 REFERENCES 49Appendix A - Roadway Technical Design Criteria TableAppendix B - Detailed Design DrawingsAppendix C - Synchro Analysis Results TableAppendix D - PC SWMM / QGIS Inputs and ResultsAppendix E - Pedestrian Walkway CalculationsAppendix F - Quantity Takeoff and Cost EstimateAppendix G - Detailed Construction ScheduleAppendix H - Roadway Life Cycle AnalysisUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 3LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1.1 Project Study AreaFigure 2.1 Intersection Sightline Check ExampleFigure 2.2 Proposed Roadway Transition at Stadium RoadFigure 2.3 Transit Stop Bicycle BypassesFigure 2.4 Swept Path Example - Stadium RoadFigure 2.5 Eagles Drive to Thunderbird Blvd Cross SectionFigure 3.1 Typical Cross-section of Rain GardenFigure 4.1 Plan View of Pedestrian WalkwayFigure 4.2 Rendering of the Pedestrian WalkwayFigure 4.3 Tapered Cantilever BeamFigure 4.4 Beam Sleeve ConnectionFigure 5.1 East Mall PhasingFigure 5.2 Sample SIte Layout - Phase A.2.2 East Side ConstructionFigure 5.3 Phase B - Covered Walkway StagingFigure 5.4 ScheduleFigure 5.5 Design Pareto FrontiersFigure 5.6 Cost and GWP for Best DesignFigure 5.7 1000 Deterioration Simulations for Selected Design (SN 2.76)Figure 5.8 Cumulative Probability of First MaintenanceLIST OF TABLESTable 1.1 Team Member ContributionTable 2.1 Standards and Guidelines Referenced in Roadway DesignTable 2.2 Software in Roadway DesignTable 2.3 Key Design Criteria in Roadway DesignTable 2.4 Design VehiclesTable 2.5 2040 Synchro Results SummaryTable 2.6 Left-Turn Lane Analysis - 2040 Weekday PeaksTable 2.7 Roadway Design Specifications TableTable 3.1 Standards and Guidelines Referenced in Stormwater DesignTable 3.2 Software in Stormwater DesignTable 3.3 Summary of the Three Rainfall ScenariosTable 3.4 Growing Medium SpecificationsTable 3.5 Summary of GSITable 3.6 Summary of Pipeline ComponentsTable 3.7 Target ResultsTable 4.1 Key Walkway Component DescriptionTable 4.2 Demand and Capacity SummaryTable 5.1 East Mall Construction Issues and Mitigation IssuesUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 4Table 5.2 Walkway Construction Issues and Mitigation IssuesTable 5.3 Cost EstimateTable 5.4 Potential Factors Affecting Final CostTable 5.5 Life Cycle CostsTable 5.6 Median Time to First Maintenance, Average Maintenance Over 50 YearsTable 5.7 Rain Garden Typical MaintenanceUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 51.0 INTRODUCTION1.1 Project BackgroundUBC SEEDS is currently developing a detailed design for the East Mall Redesign Project. Apreliminary design was developed in December 2021 which included the addition of protectedbike lanes and rain gardens along East Mall, and a steel cantilevered walkway along AgronomyRd. For the detailed design stage, a design was developed that addresses the client objectivesof: (1) maximizing safety, (2) minimizing cost, (3) increasing active mode share, (4) calmingtraffic, (5) increasing green space to improve stormwater retention, (6) tying in with the proposedStadium Neighbourhood alignment, and (7) accommodating the sports field’s high PUDOdemand.The existing East Mall corridor from W16th Ave to Agronomy Rd (Figure 1.1) consists of aright-of-way (ROW) ranging from 25 m to 38 m. Each direction has a 50 km/h speed limit; isseparated by a median / yellow paint markings; and consists of unidirectional vehicle and bikelanes, parking facilities / PUDO areas, sidewalks, and planting strips. The northbound directionincorporates left-turn bays at Stadium Rd and Eagles Dr.Figure 1.1: Project Study AreaUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 61.2 Team Member ContributionBelow is a table describing contributions by individual team members for the development of thepreliminary design. In the event questions arise, it is best to contact the party responsible forthat aspect of the design.Table 1.1: Team Member ContributionTeamMember Design Responsibilities Report PreparationBennyOrr● Prepare roadway design technicalspecifications per codes / standards● Research roadway layers● Build Civil 3D corridor model and prepareproduction drawings● Generate quantity reports pertaining toroadway design● Edited Section 2.0ColleenQiu● Prepare roadway design technicalspecifications as per codes and standards● Research roadway layers● Build Civil 3D corridor model and prepareproduction drawings (Plan, Profile, Section)● Drafted Section 2.1,2.2, 2.3, and 2.5● Reviewed Section 3.0Davis Su● Cost Estimate● Construction Plan and Sequencing● Walkway Connection Design and Drawings● AutoTurn analysis● Drafted Section 2.4,4.6, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0● Reviewed Section 4.0HamedBarkh● Roadway Life Cycle Analysis● Roadway Maintenance Schedule● Walkway, Rain Garden, Maintenance Plans● Schedule● Overland flow modelling● Drafted ExecutiveSummary, Section 5.3,5.4● Reviewed Section 2.0MelissaLuo● Pedestrian walkway design and analysis● Walkway detailed drawings● Walkway technical specifications● Walkway 3D modelling● Drafted Section 4.0● Reviewed Section 6.0ShotaInoda● Stormwater design and analysis● Stormwater detailed drawings● Pipeline system layout and design● PCSWMM stormwater model● Drafted Section 3.0● Reviewed Section 5.0UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 72.0 ROADWAY DESIGN2.1 Standards and Software UsedThroughout the roadway design process, guidelines in various categories were referenced forboth parametric and qualitative considerations as shown in Table 2.1 and 2.2.Table 2.1: Standards and Guidelines Referenced in Roadway DesignGuideline / Standard Version / YearGeometric Design GuidelinesTAC Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads (Chapter 2-6, 9) June 2017BC Supplement to TAC Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads April 2019BC Active Transportation Design Guide (“ATDG”) 2019Pavement Design GuidelinesAASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures 1993BC MoTI Pavement Structure Design Guidelines 2015Toronto Transportation Services - Pavement Design and RehabilitationGuideline 2019Other Guidelines for General ReferenceCity of Vancouver Engineering Design Manual V1 (2019)City of Vancouver Construction Specifications V1(2019)City of Vancouver Standard Detail Drawings - Roadworks Sep 2018City of Surrey Supplementary Master Municipal Construction Documents April 2020UBC Vancouver Campus Plan - Part 3 Design Guidelines Oct 2020Table 2.2: Software in Roadway DesignSoftware Project ApplicationSynchro 6 The study area was modelling to determine link and node LOS, delay,and V/C. Modelling results informed our left-turn bay design decisions.AutoCAD 2020 AutoCAD was used to create preliminary plan drawings of the roadwayand to add markups to the detailed design drawings.Autodesk Civil 3D2021 Civil 3D was used for corridor modelling and IFC drawing production.AutoTurn 11 Demo A swept path analysis using AutoTurn was conducted on the roadwayto verify turning movements, vehicle path feasibility, and parking.Pave-Save (Shaniet al. 2021 )Various pavement designs were input into the LCA model to determinethe optimal asphalt thickness.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 82.2 Design CriteriaBased on the guidelines and standards listed in Section 2.1 and the client’s objectives, the keydesign criteria below were identified for each design component as shown in Table 2.3. Thebolded criteria are design input determined by our engineering team after discussion with theclient. For the full technical specification table, please see Appendix A.Table 2.3: Key Design Criteria in Roadway DesignDesignComponent Key Design CriteriaTravel Lane● Design vehicle: WB-20● Design speed: 50 km/h● Minimum horizontal radius = 100 m (per TAC) for 50 km/h roads with 2%superelevation● Minimum K factor = 7 and Maximum grade = 6% (per TAC)● Minimum width = 3.3 m to 3.7 m for rural roadways with buses and largertrucks (per TAC)● Synchro: Projected volumes meet Level of Service > D and V/C Ratio < 1Parking Lane ● Typical width = 2.4 m (per TAC)● Relieve parking stressBicycleThrough Zone● Design cyclist speed = 30 to 35 km/h● Minimum horizontal radius = 24 to 33 m (per TAC) for 30-35 km/h with 2%superelevation● Desired width = 2.0 m for uni-directional bike lanes with <150 bikes/hr (perATDG) - available counts at Thunderbird Blvd shows <40 bikes/hr (CTScounts from client)● Desirable concrete buffer width = 0.6 m (per ATDG)● Maximum superelevation = 2% for universal accessibility (per TAC & ATDG)LandscapeZone● Minimum width = 1.5 m for furnishing zones with larger trees (per ATDG)● Recommended width = 2.0 m for basic furnishing zones (per ATDG)PedestrianThrough Zone● Desired width = 2.4 m for a collector road next to multi-family residential landuse (per ATDG)SafetyComponents● Recommended setback distance from road edge = 4.4 m (per TAC)● For 50 km/h design speeds, stopping sight distance = 65 m (per TAC)● Curb extension: Transition curve radius between the main and extended curbshall contain a 3-5 m radius for street cleaning vehicles to maneuver properlyPavementStructure● Typical Pavement Structure Type C: Low Volume & Subdivision Roads (20 yrDesign ESAL < 100,000): 50 - 75 mm AP, 225 mm of 25mm CBC, 300 mmmin. of SGSB on Fine Grained Soil per BCMoTI Pavement Structure DesignGuidelines○ ESAL calculated based on CTS traffic counts provided by client○ AP thickness selected based on life cycle analysis consideringUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 9road and pavement layer parameters● Typical bike lane pavement thickness: 50 mm AP and 150mm Granular Base(per CoV)● Smooth concrete finishes on sidewalk pavement (per UBC)2.3 Technical Considerations and Design Rationale2.3.1 Plan Drawing ComponentsIntersections: When designing the horizontal alignment of the road, we paid special attentionto the stopping-sight-distance (SSD) at intersections to ensure safety of road users. SSD is thedistance required for vehicles to react, brake, and come to a stop, which is typically taken as65 m for a 50 km/hr design speed. The placement of parking zones and curb extensions wasdecided based on sightline checks per the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC)Geometric Design Guide, 2017 as shown in Figure 2.1. Landscaping and parked vehicles thatcan obstruct driver view should be avoided in the “clear sight triangles” as shown in Figure 2.1.Figure 2.1: Intersection Sightline Check ExampleCurb Extensions: Curb extensions of 5 m radius were placed to mark parking terminationpoints, narrow pedestrian crossing widths to reduce probability of collisions, and allow forsmooth maintenance vehicle maneuvers during periodic roadway cleaning.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 10Stadium Road Transition: When transitioning from a 25.5 m right-of-way (ROW) to a 35.0 mone, the lanes have been curved at a radius of 100 m at Stadium Road as a speed controlmeasure as shown in Figure 2.2.Figure 2.2: Proposed Roadway Transition at Stadium RoadBicycle Lane Transition and Bypass at Transit Stops: Two design speeds and horizontalalignment curvature radius were considered for the bike lane design due to the roadway grade(uphill / downhill). The northbound direction going uphill from W16th Ave to Thunder Blvd alongEast Mall features a 24 m horizontal radius curvature at a 30 km/h design speed. TheUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 11southbound direction going downhill from Thunderbird Blvd to W16th Ave features a 30-33 mhorizontal radius curvature at a 35 km/h design speed. The wider horizontal radius curvatureallows cyclists to perform safer turning maneuvers at transition points / bicycle bypasses whiletravelling at greater downhill speeds.The existing community shuttle bus stops at Eagles Drive will also be upgraded to incorporate abicycle bypass (outlined in TAC Geometric Design Guide, 2017 Section 5.7.4) as shown inFigure 2.3. This is based on the consideration of potential conflicts betweenembarking/disembarking bus passengers with cyclists when busses stop adjacent to theprotected bike lane without a transit island. Hence, a transit island with a 2.3 m width is added toaddress this conflict. Crossings with clear markings, pavement treatment, and signages willmitigate the conflict between the cyclists and the pedestrians crossing to the island byenhancing crosswalk visibility.Figure 2.3: Transit Stop Bicycle BypassesUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 12Left-Turn Bays: The existing left-turn bay is removed at Stadium Road to make room for theStadium Neighbourhood developments. All other existing left-turn bays have been maintainedalong East Mall. A capacity analysis was conducted for left-turn bay requirements along thecorridor and is further discussed in Section 2.4.Turning Radius and Swept Path Analysis: A swept path analysis was conducted usingAutoTurn, a software that allows 2D simulation of vehicle movement paths. The analysis wasused to verify the feasibility of turning movements, vehicle paths, and parking maneuvers on theroad designs. Analysis is typically done using representative design vehicles developed by TAC.However, due to trial software limitations, only the DEMO vehicle was available. The vehiclewas rescaled to approximately match the TAC design vehicles (example shown in Figure 2.4).Design vehicles used are listed in Table 2.4. A minimum 0.5m vehicle clearance can bemaintained for all necessary vehicle movements.Table 2.4: Design VehiclesVehicle DescriptionTACWB-20Largest design vehicle. Note: As East Mall is not a truck route, curb radii and left-turnbays were not designed for WB-20 maneuvers. In locations where WB-20 maneuversare necessary, standard large truck maneuvers (e.g. using adjacent lanes for turns,oversteer turns, driving on lane lines) were considered acceptable.TAC P Passenger vehicles used to verify turning movements, vehicles paths, and parking.TAC MSU Medium trucks used to verify turning movements, vehicle paths, and parking.Figure 2.4: Swept Path Example - Stadium RoadUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 132.3.2 Profile Drawing ComponentsSince the elevation change along East Mall is relatively small, maximum grade is not a concernfor automobiles or bicycles. Since a 2% cross slope is adopted, a minimum longitudinal grade isnot mandatory for drainage. Crest curves have to be flat enough to provide sufficient sightdistances, and these sight distance considerations are accounted for in the K-value limits. Sincethe road base is in good condition, the existing road profile has been maintained as much aspossible to reduce costs.2.3.3 Section Drawing ComponentsDrainage and integration with stormwater infrastructure are the main considerations in sectiondesign. A cross slope (or superelevation) of 2% has been implemented in all the sections asshown in Figure 2.5. When a centre rain garden is present, both sides of the roadway areslanted towards the rain garden. From West 16th Ave to Stadium Road where there is no raingarden, the roadway is sloped towards the curb and gutter by the elevated bike lane. Pavementlayer materials and thickness are determined based on 20-year design Equivalent Single AxleLoad (ESAL) (see Table 2.3), industry standards, and a life cycle analysis (see Section 5.4.1).The Contractor is responsible for the asphalt concrete mix design.Figure 2.5: Eagles Drive to Thunderbird Blvd Cross SectionUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 142.4 Traffic AnalysisTo evaluate the proposed roadway design, traffic analysis was conducted using Synchro 6, asoftware that analyzes road capacity, vehicle delay, and queue lengths to analyze 2040 trafficgrowth. 2040 AM and PM peak vehicle Level of Service (LOS), delay, and volume-capacity(V/C) ratio were found for the five intersections along East Mall as shown in Table 2.5 and ingreater detail in Appendix C. Traffic volumes used were from Bunt’s Stadium NeighbourhoodPlanning Traffic Analysis (2020) report as well as data provided by the client from CreativeTransportation Solutions. All intersections were found to operate overall at LOS C or better.Table 2.5: 2040 Synchro Results SummaryIntersection 2040 AM 2040 PMLOS Total Delay (s) Max V/C LOS Total Delay (s) Max V/CAgronomy Rd B 10.7 0.42 B 12.1 0.53Thunderbird Blvd C 25 0.91 C 20.6 0.79Logan Ln A 0.1 0.41 A 0.1 0.37Eagle Dr A 0.2 0.4 A 0.2 0.37Stadium Rd A 4.9 0.62 A 6.3 0.53There are potential capacity issues at Thunderbird Blvd, with a 0.91 V/C in the northboundthrough movement. The analysis assumes moderate vehicle growth into 2040. Given UBC’stravel mode strategy, vehicle growth will likely be lower than modelled, meaning activetransportation oriented policies may be a viable strategy as opposed to roadway expansions.Left Turn-Bay Analysis: A capacity analysis of left-turn movements along the corridor wasconducted in Synchro. A major consideration was the 95th percentile queue length, a value thatrepresents the highest queue reasonably expected with a 1/20 chance of occurrence.Additionally, per the Highway Capacity Manual 2000, left-turn bays are typically consideredwhen turning vehicles approach 100 vehicles and should be verified with a capacity analysis. AUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 15summary of findings is provided below, with analysis results shown in Table 2.6:● Longer queues are expected for the northbound AM and southbound PM movements atThunderbird Boulevard where there are no left-turn bays. However, the low peak hourleft turn volumes do not justify a left turn bay (36 NB AM and 6 SB PM vehicles).● Although Stadium road is expected to have left-turn volumes greater than 100 during the2040 AM and PM peaks, minimal disruptions to traffic queues and LOS are expected,meaning a left-turn bay removal is acceptable.Table 2.6: Left-Turn Lane Analysis - 2040 Weekday PeaksIntersection LeftTurn Approach2040 AM 2040 PMLeft TurnVolume LOS95th Perc.Queue (m)ExistingStorage (m)Left TurnVolume LOS95th Perc.Queue (m)ExistingStorage (m)Thunderbird Blvd NB 36 C #146.9** N/A 20 B 24.4** N/AThunderbird Blvd SB 42 B 15.1** N/A 6 C #81.2** N/AThunderbird Blvd EB 4 B 21.4** N/A 15 A 18.5 N/AThunderbird Blvd WB 190 B #46.4 50 57 B #62.0** 50Eagle Dr NB 7 A 0.1 40 9 B 0.2 40Stadium Rd NB 111 A 4 40* 223 A 10.3 40**Stadium road northbound left-turn bay to be removed for new neighbourhood alignment. Due to the limitations ofSynchro, the delay and LOS results were not found to change**For intersections without left-turn bays, queue lengths are for the combined left-through movement.2.5 Key Components DescriptionKey dimensions of lane widths, horizontal radius, superelevation, longitudinal gradient, K-valuesof vertical curves as well as pavement layers are specified in Table 2.7. Note that existing curband sidewalk letdown placements and dimensions are maintained where possible. For detailingof other roadway components such as signages and lightings, please refer to municipal designstandards. Detailed plan, profile, and section drawings as well as references to relevantroadway component standard detail drawings from municipalities are included in Appendix B.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 16Table 2.7: Roadway Design Specifications Table*Note: Notations such as “L1000-Line” refer to horizontal alignment lines in accordance with the design drawings (see Appendix B).Location (S to N) Pedestrian Through Zone Bicycle Through Zone Parking Lane Vehicle Lane Median Landscape ZoneW16th Ave Proposed design to tie-in with the existing intersection (roundabout controlled) as per the client’s scopeL1000-LineW16th Ave -Stadium RoadROW = 25.5 mDesigned as per the schematic cross section layout provided by the client➢ Width: 2.35 m (East Side - E)and 2.4 m (West Side - W)➢ Separated from bike lane withlandscape zone➢ 2% superelevation towards curb➢ Width: 2.2 m➢ Unidirectional and elevated (height = 0.15 m)➢ Separated from sidewalk and parking lane withlandscape zone and concrete buffer, respectively➢ Concrete buffer width: 0.6 m➢ 2% superelevation towards curb➢ Width: 2.5 m➢ 6 paid parking stallsconverted to 5-minutepick-up / drop-off spots➢ 2% superelevationtowards curb➢ Width: 3.3 m➢ 2% superelevationtowards curb➢ Removed to accommodatenarrow 25.5 m ROW➢ Width: 1.8 m (E) and1.75 m (W)➢ 2% superelevationtowards curb➢ Street lights placed on Eat 45 m interval and 0.5m from edge near road➢ K-value of crest/sag curves: ranges from 16.20 to 118.75 (identical profiles in both directions)➢ Longitudinal gradient: ranges from 0.74% to 1.47% (identical profiles in both directions)Stadium Road➢ Control Type: Stop➢ Transition from 25.5 m to 35 m ROW: Vehicle lane horizontal radius = 100 m (NB)➢ LT bay removed as supported by synchro analysis (see Section 2.3 - Traffic Analysis in Synchro: Left Turn-Bay Analysis)➢ Curb extension (radius = 5 m) with rain garden (E) and concrete (W) used to narrow crossing distance➢ Crosswalk with Rectangular Flash Beacon (RRFB) and paint-markings to improve safety➢ Proposed sidewalk letdown on east side (see CoV Standard Detailed Drawings R4.1, R4.2, and R7.1 for details)L1100/1200-LineStadium Road -Parking LotEntrance (W)-Eagles DriveROW = 35 m➢ Width: 2.6 m (E) and 2.4 m (W)➢ W side is adjacent to bike lane➢ E side is separated from bikelane with landscape zone➢ 2% superelevation towards raingarden (road center)➢ Width: 2.3 m➢ Unidirectional and elevated (height = 0.15 m)➢ Separated from parking lane with concrete buffer➢ Concrete buffer width: 1.0 m➢ 2% superelevation towards rain garden (road centre)➢ Width: 2.5 m➢ 2% superelevationtowards rain garden(road centre)➢ Width: 3.5 m➢ 2% superelevationtowards rain garden(road centre)➢ Width: 9 m➢ Median converted to raingarden➢ Width: 2.4 m (E only) topreserve existing ROW(existing condition do nothave landscape zone onW side)➢ K-value of crest/sag curves: ranges from 225.28 to 299.21 from south to north and 29.48 to 71.38 from north to south➢ Longitudinal gradient: ranges from 0.75% to 1.41% from south to north and -0.59% to -1.64% from north to southParking LotEntrance (W)➢ Control Type: Stop and curb extension radius: 5 m➢ LT bay storage length and width to be maintained, but shifted towards the median to minimize project cost and allow for future volume growth from new developments➢ No crosswalk provided (same as existing conditions)Eagles Drive➢ Control Type: Stop➢ LT bay storage length and width to be maintained, but shifted towards the median to minimize project cost and allow for future volume growth from new developments➢ Curb extension (radius = 5 m) with absorbent landscape (E) and concrete (W) used to narrow crossing distance➢ Crosswalk with Rectangular Flash Beacon (RRFB) and paint-markings to improve safety➢ Proposed sidewalk letdown on east side (see CoV Standard Detailed Drawings R4.1, R4.2, and R7.1 for details)➢ The existing community shuttle bus stop locations (NB and SB) are maintained, but will be modified to incorporate a bicycle bypass configuration (“scissors transit stop”)○ East side bicycle bypass horizontal radius: 24 m○ West side bicycle bypass horizontal radius: 30 mL1100/1200-LineEagles Drive -Logan Lane -Thunderbird BlvdROW = 38 m➢ Width: 2.6 m (E) and 2.4 m (W)➢ Separated from bike lane withlandscape zone➢ 2% superelevation towards raingarden (road centre)➢ Width: 2.3 m➢ Unidirectional and elevated (height = 0.15 m)➢ Separated from sidewalk and parking lane withlandscape zone and concrete buffer, respectively➢ Concrete buffer width: 1 m➢ 2% superelevation towards rain garden (road centre)➢ Width: 2.5 m➢ 2% superelevationtowards rain garden(road centre)➢ Width: 3.5 m➢ 2% superelevationtowards rain garden(road centre)➢ Width: 9 m➢ Median converted to raingarden➢ Width: 2.4 m (E) and 3m (W)➢ 2% superelevationtowards rain garden(road centre)➢ K-value of crest/sag curves: ranges from 155.32 to 299.21 from south to north and 161.16 to 493.49 from north to south➢ Longitudinal gradient: ranges from 0.61% to 1.16% from south to north and -1.04% to -0.47% from north to southUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report Page XLogan Lane➢ Control Type: Stop➢ Maintain existing right-in / right-out movements from East Mall to Logan Ln and vice versa➢ No crosswalk provided as blocked by median (same as existing conditions)➢ Parking stalls removed for the westside of East Mall between Logan Ln and Thunderbird Blvd to provide bike lane transition that is at-grade with the vehicle laneThunderbirdBoulevard➢ Control Type: Signalized➢ Maintain existing overhead traffic signals on all corners➢ Transition from the proposed to existing alignment:○ Vehicle lane horizontal radius = 550 m (SB)○ Bike lane horizontal radius = 24 m (NB) and 33 m (SB)➢ No NB LT bay provided because existing wide medians on both the north and south sides of the intersection are sufficient to accommodate vehicles waiting to turn left➢ Curb extension (radius = 5 m), next to which elevated bike lane drops off into separated bike lane with paint-markings for NB direction and vice versa for SB direction➢ Maintain crosswalk on all approaches (same as existing conditions)L1300 to 1600-LineThunderbird Blvd -Agronomy RoadROW = 24 mThe existing road configuration is preserved. However, paint-markings and median need to be modified to tie in with the modified configuration before Thunderbird Blvd.➢ Width: 2.9 m (E) and 2.0 m (W)➢ Separated from bike lane withlandscape zone➢ Width: 1.6 m➢ Unidirectional and at road grade➢ Separated from vehicle lane with paint-marking only➢ None ➢ Width: 3.5 m ➢ None except immediatelyafter Thunderbird Blvdintersection➢ Width: 2.4 m (W) and6.5 m (E)➢ K-value of crest/sag curves: maintains existing➢ Longitudinal gradient: maintains existingAgronomy Road The existing intersection configuration is maintainedPavementStructure➢ 100 mm Concrete Pavementwith light broom finish➢ 50 mm Asphalt Pavement (AP) and 150 mm GranularBase (GB)➢ 75 mm AP➢ Existing CBC andSGSB maintainedwhere possible➢ 75 mm AP➢ Existing CBC andSGSB maintainedwhere possible➢ Sandy loam as top soil forvegetation➢ Sandy loam as top soilfor vegetationUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report Page X3.0 STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTUREAs the population of UBC grows, the trend of densification has resulted in loss of greenery.Combined with the effects of climate change, this can result in increased flooding, habitatdepletion, and pollution in the water system. UBC’s Integrated Stormwater Management Planhas indicated concerns for East Mall between Thunderbird Blvd and West 16th Ave, stating“continued source-point controls will be important for any new development”. By implementingGreen Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI), peak runoffs may be reduced by absorbing excesswater, and runoff water quality may be improved by filtering stormwater. This section provides adescription of the Green Stormwater Infrastructure design implemented in our design.To reduce the risk of flooding, reduce untreated stormwater discharge, and increasegreenspace, a center median rain garden is proposed along East Mall from 16th Ave toThunderbird Blvd. The design retrofits the pre-existing large center median on East Mall with arain garden.3.1 Standards and SoftwareThroughout the GSI design process, guidelines in various categories were referenced for bothparametric and qualitative considerations as shown in Table 3.1.Table 3.1: Standards and Guidelines Referenced in Stormwater DesignGuideline / Standard Year of ReleaseGSI Design GuidelinesFisheries and Oceans Canada Guidelines 2001City of Vancouver’s Rainwater Infrastructure Guideline 2018Metro Vancouver Stormwater Source Control Design Guidelines 2012Vancouver Campus Plan Design Guidelines Part 3 2010Pipeline Design GuidelinesUBC Technical Guidelines Section 33 49 00 2020Table 3.2 presents the various softwares used for the stormwater design.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 19Table 3.2: Software in Stormwater DesignSoftware Project ApplicationPCSWMM The study area was modelling using PCSWMM to analyze the run-off andinfiltration rates.AutoCAD 2020 AutoCAD was used to create detailed plan drawings of the rain gardenand to add markups to the detailed design drawings.QGIS Overland flow was modeled using QGIS to determine the degree ofoverland water accumulation3.2 Design TargetsBelow are the design objectives set for our project following the Fisheries and Oceans CanadaGuidelines and City of Vancouver’s Rainwater Infrastructure Guidelines.1. Collect and treat the volume of the 6-month/24-hour precipitation event equalling 90% ofthe total rainfall from impervious areas with suitable Best Management Practices(BMPs).2. Reduce post-development flows to pre-development levels for the 6-month/24- hour,2-year/24-hour, and 5-year/24-hour precipitation events.3. Remove 80% of total suspended solids from the first 24 mm of rainfall from all previousand impervious surfaces.3.3 Rainfall AnalysisTo analyze the effectiveness of the GSI design implemented in the East Mall Redesign Project,3 rainfall scenarios with different durations were used. A summary of the rainfall events areshown on Table 3.3. The following points were considered when obtaining our 3 rainfallscenarios:UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 20● IDF (Intensity-Duration-Frequency) curves were obtained from IDF_CC Tool 4.0 byWestern University. The curves represent a climate model with a time period rangingfrom 2006 to 2100. This accounts for the effects climate change on future rainfall events.● SCS Type 1A curve with a time interval of 6 mins was used to replicate a typical rainfalldistribution. The SCS Type 1A was developed by the Soil Conservation Service. Type 1Astorms represent pacific climates with wet winters and dry summers.● A 6-month/24-hour precipitation event was assumed to be 72% of the 2-year, 24-hourevent volume.The distribution of rainfall for each scenario is summarized in Table 3.3. Climate change wasconsidered for all IDF curves to accurately model future scenarios. The 3 IDF curves werechosen to depict practical scenarios which East Mall will commonly experience.Table 3.3: Summary of the Three Rainfall ScenariosScenario Model Intensity-Duration-Frequency Time (h) Total rainfall (mm)1 SCS Type 1A 6-month 24-hour (under climate change) 24 41.02 SCS Type 1A 2-year 24-hour (under climate change) 24 56.93 SCS Type 1A 5-year 24-hour (under climate change) 24 72.193.3 Evapotranspiration AnalysisDaily evapotranspiration (ET) data provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada at theVancouver Airport station was chosen for evapotranspiration analysis because of its proximity toUBC. The effects of climate change were ignored during the analysis. While climate change willlikely increase air temperature, the effects of higher humidity and CO2 concentrations areexpected to counteract the effects due to rise in temperature (Snyder et al., 2011). For ourmodel, the annual average evapotranspiration of 1.9 mm/day was used. Monthly ET values areprovided in Appendix B.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 213.4 Groundwater AnalysisThe water table at UBC was indicated to be typically greater than 45 m below ground level(Piteau Associates Engineering., 2002). Due to the deep water table, the water table isassumed to have negligible impact on the infiltration of surface runoff during the analysis.However, due to a layer of low permeability till just below the topsoil, there is potential for waterto pool over this layer during heavy rainfall events. The increasing number of impermeablesurfaces such as roads and parking lots have further aggravated the problem by causing moredemand for water infiltration in permeable areas.The thickness of the till layer varies along East Mall. There are concerns that the till layer maybe thicker than anticipated below the rain garden which may cause lower infiltration rates thananticipated. It is recommended that the contractor conducts boreholes tests to a depth of up to15m to assess if excavating a portion of the till is necessary.3.5 Plants and SoilGreen stormwater infrastructures such as rain gardens can remove pollutants from runoff flows.Plants rooted into the soil slow the flow of runoff, allowing the pollutant particles to settle, whichare then incorporated into the soil where it is immobilized and/or decomposed. Deeper topsoilhelps with plant resiliency and water retention due to the roots reaching further down into thesoil. A soil depth of 450 mm is assumed to meet the 80% TSS removal target set for this projectand therefore is the recommended soil depth for the rain garden and absorbent landscape. Wealso recommend a minimum of 10% organic matter to increase the water carrying capacity andUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 22promote healthier plants that are more resilient to pests. Table 3.4 identifies the growingmedium properties for the rain garden.Table 3.4: Growing Medium SpecificationsParticle Size Percent of dry weightGravel 0%Sand 45-60%Silt 20-30%Clay 15-30%Organic Content 10-15%50 mm of mulch is recommended to cover the exposed soil in the rain garden to reduce erosionand prevent weeding. The mulch must be medium-size to ensure it is not too large that it floatsor too small that it reduces infiltration. Mulch shall be replaced a minimum of once a year toprolong the life expectancy of the rain garden. The gravel storage below the growing mediummust have a void ratio of 0.75 and contain only materials in the range of 9mm to 20mm. Thedetailed drawing of the rain garden profile is provided in Appendix B.Flood tolerant, tall growing plants such as red-osier dogwood, Labrador tea, and Spiraeadouglasii are recommended for the rain garden. The rain garden should have a mixture ofdifferent colours to improve the aesthetics and attract wildlife. For information on maintenancestrategies refer to Section 5.4.3.3.6 Overland FlowOverland flow was modelled using the kinematic wave D8 algorithm in QGIS (Johnson, D. L., &Miller, A. C. 1997) to determine the accumulation of stormwater on East Mall. The model used8,802,667 lines of x, y, z data from Abacus (University of British Columbia. Campus andCommunity Planning. 2015) to interpolate a digital elevation model of UBC Vancouver campus.A homogeneous rainfall over the entire region was analyzed for a 24 hour period with 6 minuteUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 23time steps. Results indicated that there was some accumulation at the bottom of East Mall near16th Ave. However, major overland flow accumulation was not a concern. A figure showing theflow accumulation on East Mall is presented in Appendix D.3.7 Design Description3.7.1 Design LayoutRain gardens and absorbent landscapes are the two GSIs implemented on East Mall(descriptions in Table 3.5).Table 3.5: Summary of GSIGSI DescriptionAbsorbentLandscapeArea: 9955m2● 450mm deep topsoil which is assumed to remove over 80% of totalsuspended solids (TSS)● American sweet gum trees planted along absorbent landscape● Podzol soil underneath the topsoilRain GardenArea: 1789m2● 450 mm deep growing and infiltrating medium (sandy loam) whichis assumed to remove over 80% of total suspended solids (TSS).● A 200 mm deep gravel layer beneath the soil and a 190mmdiameter PVC pipe connecting the rain garden to the main stormsewer.● The side slopes are 200 mm high to allow water to pool beforeflooding over to the road. Maximum slope of 20%● Plants used: Red osier dogwood, labrador tea, sweet gale, douglasspirea, lyngby’s sedge, slough sedge, beaked sedge,small-flowered bulrush● Maximum overflow structures spacing of 10m● At the widest cross-section between eagles and Thunderbird therain garden is 4.8m wide with 2.1m absorbent landscape bufferzones between the rain garden and the paved roadA section view of the GSI is presented below in Figure 3.1 and in further detail in Appendix B.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 24Figure 3.1: Typical Cross-section of Rain GardenBased on UBC’s ISMP and Section 3.6, the primary concern for stormwater was between 16thAve and Thunderbird Blvd. North of Thunderbird Blvd was determined to be “well drained andonly presents minor flooding” by UBC’s ISMP. The layout which was designed to effectivelycapture stormwater is presented in Appendix B.3.7.2 Pipeline SystemThe storm sewer design followed UBC Technical Guidelines. Overflow structures connect therain garden to the main stormwater drainage system, conveying any overflow the rain garden isnot able to infiltrate. Manholes are placed throughout the system to enable inspections andmaintenance operations. The original stormwater system was kept and only portions near therain gardens were modified to connect the overflow structure to the main pipeline. Table 3.6describes various components of the stormwater system. The locations of the pipelinecomponents along East Mall are presented in Appendix B.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 25Table 3.6: Summary of Pipeline ComponentsComponent DescriptionPipelineLength: 920m● 450mm Diameter PVC piping● 1.5m below ground level● Flows only by gravity with a minimum velocity of 0.6m/s whenflowing full to half full● Minimum slope of 0.2%● 750 mm horizontal clearance with sanitary sewerManhole ● Maximum spacing of 100m● Located at every bend in the pipelineCatch Basin/overflowstructure● Services a maximum area of 500m2 to● Minimum slope of 1% catch basin leads● 0.5m pipeline offset from bottom of catch basin to catchdebris and mitigate clogging in pipeline● At rain gardens: An overflow structure which conveysextreme rainfall volumes to the stormwater system eliminatingthe need for a regular catch basin3.8 Stormwater ModelOur proposed rain garden was modelled to verify that our design meets the stormwater criteriaset in Section 3.2. All stormwater modelling was completed in PCSWMM Professional 2Dbecause of its capabilities in analyzing complex conditions which considers rainfall, soilparameters, catchment characteristics, and pipe systems. Further breakdown of the stormwatermodel including elevation graphs of pipeline, layout of East Mall, detailed rainfall distributions,runoff and infiltration rates for different models/scenarios are included in Appendix D.3.7.1 Design Model Input and ParametersA summary of the model input and parameters are listed below. A more detailed breakdown ofall parameters are included in Appendix D:● The topsoil at UBC was assumed to be loam with the soil characteristics outlined in theSWMM 5.1 Manual.● The rain garden’s soil was assumed to be sandy loam with dense vegetation growthUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 26● The maximum overland flow distance for each sub catchment was assumed to be halfthe ROW.● Fixed evapotranspiration potential of 1.89mm/day was used for the 24 hour rainfallevents.● Snowfall effects were negligible and assumed to have no effect on the model (Snowcatch factor of 1).● Horton's infiltration method was used to analyze the absorbent landscape● Model used 5 subcatchments: West 16th Ave to Stadium Road, Stadium Road to EagleDrive, Thunderbird Boulevard Intersection, and Eagle Drive to Thunderbird Boulevard,and Thunderbird Boulevard to Agronomy Road.3.7.2 PCSWMM ResultsAll design targets identified in Section 3.2 were achieved based on guidelines mentioned inSection 3.1 and our PC SWMM model. A detailed breakdown of the results are shown inAppendix D.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 274.0 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY4.1 Design Standards and CriteriaThe design criteria such as codes and standards followed are discussed for each of thecomponents below.Steel Members Sizing: Wind load, snow load, and earthquake loads have been calculatedaccording to the NBCC 2015 to ensure gravity load and lateral stability. Dead load was obtainedby computing the member’s self weight referencing the steel sections catalogue. The calculatedload demands were then inputted into SAP2000 structural analysis software to determine theinternal load demand taken by each member. The capacities of each member were determinedaccording to the CSA S16-2019 Design of Steel Structures. The design was verified by ensuringthe demand is less than the capacity using ultimate limit state design.Second Order Analysis: Beam-column action and the P-delta effect was further analyzed dueto bending moment and axial force acting simultaneous on the columns. The three limit states:cross sectional strength, overall member strength, and lateral-torsional buckling strength werecomputed according to CSA S16-19 to ensure capacity is greater than the demand.Connection Strength: Bolts and weld connection capacities were determined using CSAS16-19 and compared with the load demands calculated previously to ensure the structurewould not undergo connection failure.Footing Stability: Reinforced concrete footing capacity was calculated according to CSA A23.3Design of Concrete Structures. Reinforcement, anchors, and lateral ties configurations wereUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 28designed to standard. The capacity was compared to the load demand calculated previously toensure it’s sufficient.4.2 Site LocationThe pedestrian covered walkway consists of a single row of columns supporting a cantilevercanopy. It is planned to be installed on Agronomy Road between East Mall and Health SciencesMall. The driveway separates the canopy into two sections to allow vehicles to pass through.Each section spans 36 m and 32 m, respectively. The width of the canopy is 2.5 m, covering theentire sidewalk width to provide pedestrian weather protection. The plan view of the walkway isillustrated in Figure 4.1.Figure 4.1: Plan View of Pedestrian WalkwayUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 294.3 Key Component DescriptionA description of key walkway components is provided in Table 4.1. The full drawing set for thewalkway is attached in Appendix B which illustrates all these design components in detail. Arendering of the walkway is provided in Figure 4.2.Table 4.1: Key Walkway Component DescriptionDesignComponentDescriptionMain SteelStructure● 3.5m tall round HS 219x9.5 columns spaced @ 4m● Tapered cantilever beam HS 178x127x9.5 extends 2.5m horizontally● 2 HS 102x51x9.5 structural beams spans 4m along the entire walkway● Joists HS 76x51x3.2 spaced @ 570mm with slot to insert glass panel● HSS Light beam (non load carrying) supported by columns allowingspace for electrical wiresFooting ● 400 mm deep 1200x1200 footing with 7-15M bars top and bottom● 75 concrete cover● 150 deep 350x350 concrete pedestal with 10M vertical and lateral ties● 320x320 base plate welded to columnConnections ● Structural beam to cantilever beam connection: Two L51x51x6.4 angleswith bolts● Column to cantilever connection: 8mm thick custom HSS sleeve (male)slot in cantilever inner wall with four 16mm diameter blind bolts● Column to cantilever connection: Weld gusset plate to cantilever andbolted to column● Beam splice connection: custom slot joint with 16mm diameter boltsGlass Panels ● 14mm thick tempered laminated glass panel● Sloped at 11 degrees with gap at the end to avoid water accumulationFabrication ● Blind bolt and sleeve connections are implemented to increase ease ofinstallation● Fillet and bevel welds could be completed in the shop to reduce fieldfabrication● All connections are designed so that only bolting is required on-site toaccelerate the construction scheduleUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 30Figure 4.2: Rendering of the Pedestrian Walkway4.4 Structural Analysis and Design ChecksVarious design checks were carried out for each component to ensure structural failure does notoccur. The governing capacity and Demand/Capacity ratios (D/C) using factored loads andcapacities are outlined in Table 4.2. Detailed calculations and design checks can be foundAppendix E.Table 4.2: Demand and Capacity SummaryComponents Demand Capacity D/C CommentsCantilever Beam287 MPa(conservativeapproach)315 MPa 91% Governed by bending stressStructural Beam288 MPa(conservativeapproach)315 MPa 92% Governed by bending stressColumn 227.7 MPa 315 MPa 72% Governed by bending stressP-Delta Analysis N/AN/ALimit State 2 and3 governs54% Limit State 2 and 3 hasequal valuesStructuralBeam-CantileverAngle Connection2.5 kN 70 kN 3.6%Bolt Shear Capacitygoverns. This connection isprovided for lateral stabilityUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 31onlyBeam SpliceConnection 12 kN (Shear) 82 kN (Shear) 15%Bolt bearing stress governs.No Axial force is expected.Column-CantileverBolt Connection 205 kN 296 kN 69%Shear resistance of columndeterminingColumn-CantileverWeld Connection205 kN (Orient 1)150 kN (Orient 2)622 kN (kN)492 kN (kN) 65%Multi-orientation force onweld. Combined D/C taken.Footing 57.5 kN500 kPa(assumed soilbearing capacity)11.5%The design is governed byreinforcement developmentlengthBase Plate 57.5 kN 690 kN 8.3%The base plate size isgoverned by the columnsection size4.5 Construction SpecificationsFull detailed technical specification regarding fabrication, materials, and welded constructioncan be found in Appendix B.4.6 Special Fabrication RequirementsNote that while most walkway components consist of readily available sections andcomponents, certain components of the walkway require specialized steel fabrication which willrequire early discussion on the contractor’s end. This includes:● Tapered cantilever beams composing custom HSS sections as shown in Figure 4.3● Sleeve connections for the cantilever and beams (see Figure 4.4). While the outerfemale sleeves consist of readily available sections, to allow for a flush sleeveconnection, the inner male sleeves must be custom fabricated as no standard section isreadily available.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 32Figure 4.3: Tapered Cantilever BeamFigure 4.4: Beam Sleeve ConnectionUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 335.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT5.1 Site Plan and Anticipated Issues5.1.1 East Mall ConstructionEast Mall is a collector road which services over 7000 veh/day and numerous pedestrians,cyclists, and buses during the pre-Covid school years. To minimize traffic disruptions, a phasedconstruction process which maintains two way traffic at all times is expected to be feasible. TheEast Mall roadway design can be split into three sub-phases (see Figure 5.1):● Phase A1 - W16th Avenue to Stadium Road● Phase A2 - Stadium Road to Eagles Drive● Phase A3 - Eagles Drive to Thunderbird BoulevardTo maintain continuous two-way traffic, each sub-phase can be further split into two subphasesfor west side construction and east side construction. As shown in Figure 5.2, parking and bikelanes can be temporarily converted to through lanes and be demarcated through tubularmarkers. Upon the completion of construction on one side, the opposite side may beconstructed, with two-way traffic being diverted to the finished side. Additional constructionissues as well as mitigation measures are summarized in Table 5.1.Figure 5.1: East Mall PhasingUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 34Figure 5.2: Sample SIte Layout - Phase A.2.2 East Side ConstructionTable 5.1: East Mall Construction Issues and Mitigation IssuesIssues Mitigation MeasuresFull and Partial RoadClosures● No full road closures expected to be necessary along East Mall● If the contractor chooses a staging option that requires full roadclosures, it should be done between May and August 2021(UBC’s online summer term) to minimize traffic disruptions.Appropriate detour routes to be identified by contractor.Maintaining 2-Way TrafficOperations● 2 way traffic can be maintained by temporarily convertingexisting parking and bike lanes to vehicle lanes with markers● Some temporary curb changes required in Phase A.1Business, Institutional,Residential Accesses(Phase A.2, A.3)● Traffic control person to facilitate site access when constructionconflicts with accesses● Some temporary curb changes required in Phase A.1● Public information plan to account for stakeholdersTrench Excavations forInstallation of pipes● OHS regulations to be followed for trench excavation andshoringPipe and SoilUncertainties● Borehole excavation prior to construction to verify utilities andsoil structureStaging Requirements ● Sufficient ROW for on-road staging while maintaining traffic● Storage available south of Stadium Road (see Figure 5.1)Parking Closure ● Parking expected to be sufficient even with stall closuresBike Lane Closure ● Traffic control plan to account for cyclist rerouting and signageUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 355.1.2 Pedestrian Walkway ConstructionThe covered walkway is to be constructed along the north side of Agronomy Road betweenEast Mall and Health Science Lane. Key construction considerations are discussed in Table 5.2and proposed walkway staging is shown in Figure 5.3.Table 5.2: Walkway Construction Issues and Mitigation IssuesIssues Mitigation MeasuresConstruction interference withpedestrian, traffic, and buildingoperations● Construction recommended from May to August 2021during UBC online summer term to minimize distributions.● Public information and traffic control planSidewalk Closures andPedestrian Safety● The construction zone along Agronomy Road should beclosed and fenced off from pedestriansLane Closures ● Single lane alternating traffic may be necessary alongAgronomy Road using traffic control personsGerald McGavin and DonaldRix buildings awning removaland entrance closure● Early notification and discussion with building managers● Early building permitting and approval● Information plan for alternative building accessMaterial deliver, staging andstorage● Proposed staging yard in parking lot by TechnologyEnterprise Building (See Figure 5.3)● Early notification and discussion with the buildingmanager and arrangements for alternative parking andaccess locations.Custom fabricatedcomponents● Early discussion with fabricators on feasibility, timeline,and delivery (See Section 4.6 for specific components tobe considered)Figure 5.3: Phase B - Covered Walkway StagingUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 365.1.3 Traffic Management PlanThe contractor is to develop a traffic management plan for the East Mall construction andwalkway construction along Agronomy Road per the BC MoTI’s Traffic Manual for Work onRoadways 2020. The plan is to include a traffic control plan, incident management plan, publicinformation plan, and implementation plan which addresses all issues mentioned in Section 5.1.The final phasing and construction sequence is to be verified by the contractor.5.2 Cost Estimate and Quantity Take-Off5.2.1 Capital CostsA Class A cost estimate was developed for the detailed design and serves as an approximateexpected bid cost. The project is expected to cost $3,578,000 in 2021 CAD and is broken downin Table 5.3 and is shown in greater detail in Appendix F. Quantities used in the cost-estimatewere estimated from the final design drawings and are shown in Appendix F. The cost estimatecovers construction capital costs following bid acceptance up until construction completion. Thisvalue includes an additional 10% contingency cost to represent unaccounted for items andvariations in bid prices as well as a 8% fee for construction management. An additional 5% ofcosts was added for bonding and insurance costs. The cost estimate was based on historicalitem bid costs from sources including:● Alberta Transportation Department Unit Prices, 2016● BC MoTI Construction and Rehabilitation Cost Guide - November 2013● RS Means● UNC Highway Safety Research Center - Costs for Pedestrian and Bicyclist InfrastructureImprovements (Bushell et al, 2013)UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 37● Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Cases from cities in the Portland, OR region(Weigand et al, 2013)All costs were scaled to 2021 CAD using the BC Highway Construction Cost Indexes which areindexes developed by the BC Ministry of Transportation to adjust historical bid costs to thecurrent year. Additionally, adjustments were made for sources outside of BC to Vancouver costsby comparing local taxes and currency values.Table 5.3: Cost EstimateItem Cost (2021 CAD)Site Clearing $115,000Roadwork $1,142,000Bike Lane Along Corridor + SIdewalk Re-construction(~20% of Corridor) $484,000Traffic Installations (Road Markings, Signage, Crossings) $89,000Walkway (Agronomy Road) $371,000Stormwater (GSI, Utilities, Landscaping) $665,000Management Fee + Permitting (8% + 0.5%) $244,000Bonding and Insurance (5%) $143,000Contingency (10%) $325,000Total $3,578,000A variety of factors may affect the actual bid price. Major assumptions in the cost estimate aswell as the effects of potential scope of work changes are identified in Table 5.4.Table 5.4: Potential Factors Affecting Final CostFactor DiscussionAsphaltResurfacing● The top 75mm asphalt layer replacement has been assumed for EastMall from W16 Ave to Thunderbird Blvd● Should the client decide not to replace the asphalt from Stadium Roadto Thunderbird Blvd, up to $170,000 may be savedRoad SubgradeInstallation● Asphalt resurfacing without changes to existing subgrades assumed(except the new road area from W16th Ave to Stadium Rd)● Should major subgrade concerns be discovered in testing, up to anadditional $530,000 may be requiredUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 38StadiumNeighbourhood● The previously proposed road upgrades in preparation for the StadiumNeighbourhood Developments along East Mall from W16 Ave toStadium Road have been included in the cost estimate.Engineering ● The majority of engineering required has been assumed to becomplete and was not directly considered. Additional engineeringcosts are only covered by the contingency and management fee.TrafficManagement● Traffic management was assumed to be included in the historical bidcosts in each item and was not considered separately. Specificmeasures (e.g. consultant fees for temporary timing plans, temporarycurb removals, temporary road installations,etc), were not explicitlyaccounted for and are only captured in the contingency.5.2.2 Life Cycle Costs and Present WorthOperation and maintenance (O&M) costs for the roadway, stormwater, and walkway projectannually as well as over 50-year life cycle were assessed and are shown in Table 5.5. There isan expected annual cost of approximately $46,100 and an overall project present worth of$6,186,000 2021 CAD over a 50-year life cycle. Only cost items shown in Table 5.5 wereconsidered, meaning costs that were not included were not considered in the estimate. It wasfound that most cost items (road and bike lane maintenance) are existing costs which also applyto a “Do-Nothing” option. Costs that are unique to the proposed design designated “New” inTable 5.5 and costs that overlap with existing costs labelled “Existing”. Factoring out existingO&M costs, the project is only expected to add $8,500 annually or $425,000 over a 50-year lifecycle. The additional cost is primarily from the O&M costs of the new crosswalk RRFBs, RainGarden, and Walkway. For further discussion on service life and maintenance, see Section 5.4.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 39Table 5.5: Life Cycle CostsItem Frequency New or Existing CostEast MallRoad Rehabilitation 37 Years Existing $303,000Road O&M Annually Existing $22,000Bike Lane O&M Annually Existing $1,900Sidewalk O&M Annually Existing $2,300RRFB O&M Annually New $600Traffic Signal O&M Annually Existing $5,700Lighting O&M Annually Existing $5,700Rain Garden O&M Annually New $1,400Sub-Total (Annual Costs Only) $39,600Agronomy Road Covered WalkwayWalkway Lighting O&M Annually New $1,600.00Walkway Maintenance O&M Annually New $4,900.00Sub-Total $6,500.00OverallAnnual Total $46,10050-Year Cost (Present Worth) $2,608,000Capital Costs (From Table 5.3) $3,578,000Total Present Worth (50-Year Cost + Capital Cost) $6,186,0005.3 ScheduleThe schedule was developed by using a critical path analysis (CPA) algorithm that used a list of40 tasks, their sequencings, and expected durations to determine the earliest a task may startand finish, thereby allowing us to calculate float times for tasks that are not on the critical path.A monte carlo simulation was superimposed atop the CPA algorithm to account for variation inproductivity rates under the assumption that task durations follow triangular distributions. Thefinal stage of the project is expected to begin May 2nd 2021 and last until February 1st 2021with an expected duration of 186 work days excluding weekends and holidays. The high levelschedule may be seen in Figure 5.4 in which each repeating “A” subphase consists of roadwayUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 40demolitions, utility relocations, stormwater system installs, pavement overlays, and curb repairs.Phase B refers to the walkway and consists of demolitions, footing installation, and installationof prefabricated components. The detailed schedule breakdown, critical path analysis, andexpected task completions may be seen in Appendix G.Figure 5.4: Schedule5.4 Service-life and Maintenance Plan5.4.1 RoadwayThe service life and maintenance plan for the roadway were conducted in two steps: (1)determining the optimal asphalt thickness, and maintenance trigger value for the lowest globalwarming potential and costs over a 50 year period, and (2) back calculating the years to firstservice based on the optimal maintenance trigger value determined in step 1.Step 1: In order to determine the optimal maintenance trigger value, the ideal asphalt thicknesswas first discovered, since the thickness of the asphalt affects not only the deterioration rate, butUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 41the use phase and end of life global warming potential as well. The software package“Pave-Save” (Shani et al. 2021) was used with a set of 26 general inputs and 7 inputs for eachpavement design being considered to conduct a probabilistic LCA in order to determine theefficient frontiers for various designs as a function of IRI trigger values for maintenance (Figure5.5). The model quantified the global warming potential through the embodied impacts,pavement-vehicle interactions, albedo, and work-zone congestion and cost impacts through theconsideration of current construction and rehabilitation costs, a price index, and salvage values.A full list of the inputs used for the LCA model may be found in Appendix H.Figure 5.5: Design Pareto FrontiersWe found that a thickness of 2.756in (green dots) gave us the lowest GWP and Cost at everyIRI trigger value. Since costs decline monotonically the less often maintenance is conducted,costs are minimized by minimizing maintenance frequency. However, as maintenance is carriedout less often, the increase from road roughness leads to an increase in GHG due to theincreasing use phase impacts (Figure 5.6). Maintaining too often on the other hand, leads toUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 42large emissions from construction, in addition to higher costs. Therefore, the minimum GWPwas attained at an IRI trigger value between 3.16-3.56m/km. Given that this is a local, lowvolume road, the results are intuitive, as the main driver of GWP is from construction rather thanthe use phase. Therefore maintaining every time the road hits an IRI value of between3.16-3.56m/km will result in the lowest global warming potential. However, should the clientchoose, they can postpone maintenance to lower the life cycle costs, but potentially at theexpense of increasing GWP.Figure 5.6: Cost and GWP for Best DesignStep 2: The maintenance schedule was calculated based on the assumption that an IRI valueof 3.16, 3.36, or 3.56 m/km is chosen as the maintenance trigger. The time to first maintenanceis estimated by computing the cumulative density function from the output of 1000 simulations ofpavement degradation according to Equation 1. The equation describes deterioration as afunction of pavement age, aadtt, and structural number at each time step for hot mix asphalts.The model is assumed to follow a difference stationary process a.k.a random walk with driftaccording to the following specification (Swei et al. 2018) :UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 43[Equation 1]∆𝐷𝑖,𝑡 = α𝐴𝑔𝑒β1 𝑖,𝑡−1 𝐴𝐴𝐷𝑇𝑇β2𝑖,𝑡−1 𝑆𝑁β3𝑖,𝑡−1+ ε𝑖,𝑡where α = 0. 08 , β1= 𝑙𝑛(𝐴𝑔𝑒) , β2 = 𝑙𝑛(𝐴𝐴𝐷𝑇𝑇) , β3 = − 2. 5 , ε ∼ 𝑁(0, 2. 59 × 10−3) An output of the deterioration processes with an IRI Trigger Value of 3.56m/km is presented inFigure 5.7 below using the Age, AADTT, SN, and AADTT growth rates for our East Mall design.A Red Line indicates a simulation which underwent at least one repair, and gray lines indicatedno repairs. In Figure 5.7 each simulation required a repair, indicated by the sharp drop in IRI,and therefore every line is red. Figures for comparisons to lower and higher trigger values arepresented in Appendix H.*Equation 1. is the same model that underlies Pave-Save’s deterioration module, however it is run independentlyfrom the LCA software in order to derive more granular insights into the service life of this road.Figure 5.7: 1000 Deterioration Simulations for Selected Design (SN 2.76)UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 44The time to first maintenance for a range of trigger values is then back calculated toproduce Figure 5.8 and Table 5.6.Figure 5.8: Cumulative Probability of First MaintenanceTable 5.6: Predicted Maintenance ScheduleIRI Trigger Value(m/km) Years to First Maintenance* Average Number ofMaintenance over 50 Years3.16 35 1.063.36 37 1.013.56 39 1.00*Rounded to nearest yearOur results suggest that with any of the three IRI trigger values, only one maintenance will beneeded throughout the 50 year lifetime of the roadway. The choice to maintain at 3.16, 3.36, or3.56 trade off costs and GWP, but all three remain on the Pareto efficient frontier. Therefore it isat the operator's discretion to select a maintenance value according to GWP or costpreferences. By comparison, our estimates of time to first maintenance align well withUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 45Infrastructure Canada estimates of average expected life of new publicly owned roads suggeststhe expected useful life of this road will be approximately 34 years (Statistics Canada. (n.d.))5.4.2 Rain GardenThe rain garden is designed to be low maintenance by using a combination of resilient, low orno deciduous trees to prevent leaves from clogging the drainage mechanisms. The rain gardensexact maintenance plan will be provided by the manufacturer of the rain garden bed. Below is atable of typical maintenance activities and frequencies collected from three manufacturersspecifications. Table 5.7 contains our tabulation of common maintenance schedules accordingto guidelines published by two engineering consultancies (Kerr Wood Leidal ConsultingEngineers. (n.d.), Blue Water Baltimore (n.d)).Table 5.7: Rain Garden Typical MaintenanceMaintenance Activity FrequencyWater to promote plants during dry periodsReplace eroded vegetationAs neededPrune and weed swaleRemove trash and debrisMonthlyRemove accumulated sedimentReplace sediment and mulch that has been eroded as neededAnnuallyRemove and replace mulchTest planting bed for pH2-3 Years5.4.3 WalkwayThe walkway, being built to design snow and rain loads for British Columbia with corrosionresistant material does not require a specific maintenance plan. Rather, the system should beinspected by building operations according to the shorter of either annually or along withbuilding structural inspections.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 466.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS6.1 SummaryThe East Mall redesign project is ready with Issue-For-Construction (IFC) drawings complete forthe roadway, stormwater, and walkway designs aspects of the project including:● Roadway construction consists of new elevated bike lanes, pavement markings, RRFBinstallations, curb extensions, and road resurfacing. Road narrowing is proposed alongEast Mall from W16-Avenue to Stadium Road to require new sub-base and asphalt.● Proposed stormwater retention system includes 1789 m2 of rain garden in the East Mallmedian and proposed green curb extensions and 9555 m2 of absorbent landscape area.● 3.5 m tall covered pedestrian walkway designed along Agronomy Road between EastMall and Health Science Mall with 2.5 m canopy width.The project is expected to cost $3,578,000 CAD in 2021 capital costs and a project presentworth of $6,186,000 2021 CAD for a 50-year service life. Construction is expected to begin onMay 2nd, 2021 and last until February 1st 2022 with an expected duration of 186 work days.6.2 Recommendations and Next StepsThe following recommendations have been made for project implementation:● UBC SEEDS to tender project and awarding bid to suitable contractor● Contractor to obtain / develop relevant permits, approvals, and traffic management plan● For the rain garden construction, additional site soil conditions may be required andshould be obtained by the contractor (E.g. through borehole drilling)● Early consultation with fabricators and suppliers as well as relevant building managers isrecommended for the walkway construction along Agronomy RoadUBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 477.0 REFERENCESBlue Water Baltimore. (n.d.). Routine Maintenance Activities for Rain Gardens. RetrievedMay 4, 2021 fromhttps://bluewaterbalto.wpengine.com//wp-content/uploads/BWBRainGardenRoutineMaintenance.pdfBushell, Max A., Bryan W. Poole, Charles V. Zegeer, and Daniel A. Rodriguez. “Costs forPedestrian and Bicyclist Infrastructure Improvements.” University of North CarolinaHighway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 45 (2013)Johnson, D. L., & Miller, A. C. (1997). A spatially distributed hydrologic model utilizing rasterdata structures. Computers & Geosciences, 23(3), 267–272.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(96)00084-2Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure. “Construction and Rehabilitation Cost Guide.”Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, November 2013.https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/driving-and-transportation/transportation-infrastructure/contracting-with-the-province/documents/costguide-2013.pdf.Rain Gardens: Design, Implementation, and Maintenance Considerations. (n.d.). KerrWood Leidal Consulting Engineers. Retrieved March 7, 2021, fromhttps://www.kwl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/8-1a.pdfShani, P., Chau, S., & Swei, O. (2021). The economic cost (and savings) to reduce theglobal warming impact of transport infrastructure: A study of U.S. roadways.Resources, Conservation & Recycling, In Press.UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 48Statistics Canada. (n.d.). Table 34-10-0072-01 Average expected useful life of new publiclyowned road assets, Infrastructure Canada. Retrieved April 10, 2021, fromhttps://doi.org/10.25318/3410007201-engSwei, O., Gregory, J., & Kirchain, R. (2018). Does pavement degradation follow a randomwalk with drift? Evidence from variance ratio tests for pavement roughness. Journal ofInfrastructure Systems, 24(4), 04018027.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000450University of British Columbia. Campus and Community Planning. (2015). [University ofBritish Columbia Point Grey Campus Digital Elevation Model (DEM), 2015] (Universityof British Columbia. Campus and Community Planning, Ed.; V1 ed.). Abacus DataNetwork. https://hdl.handle.net/11272.1/AB2/2FKBA6Weigand, L., McNeil, N., Dill, J. (2013). Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Cases fromcities in the Portland, OR region. Retrieved April 12, 2021, fromDill_Bicycle_Facility_Cost_June2013.pdf (activelivingresearch.org)UBC - East Mall Redesign - Detailed Design Report 49Appendix A - Roadway Technical Design Criteria TableAppendix A - Roadway Design Technical Criteria TableDesign Element Present Conditions MoTI / TAC Guidelines Criteria Proposed Criteria Comments / Notes1.0 - RoadwayFunctional Classification Minor Minor MinorDesign Classification UCD UCD UCD UCD = Urban-Collector-Divided.Posted Speed 50 km/h 50 km/h 50 km/hDesign Speed 50 km/h 50 km/h 50 km/hBasic # of Lanes 1 per Direction 1 per Direction 1 per Direction Not including left-turn bays or transition lanes.Minimum Horizontal Radius 100 m 100 m 100 m For urban designs.Minimum K Factor (Sag V.C.) Unknown 5-6 6 For urban designs / K Factors to provide Stopping Sight Distance.Minimum K Factor (Crest V.C.) Unknown 7 7 K Factors to provide Stopping Sight Distance.Maximum Grade Unknown 6% 6% Based on rolling topography.Maximum Superlevation Unknown 6% 2% Typical maximum superelevation is 4%, but 6% is allowed.Minimum Stopping Sight Distance Unknown 65 m 65 m For a design speed of 50 km/hMinimum Intersection Sight Distance Unknown RFS/LFS: 95 m/105 m RFS/LFS: 95 m/105 m RFS = Right-turn From Stop / LFS = Left-turn From Stop.Minimum Sight-Line Setback Distance Unknown 4.4 m 4.4 m Point from the major road edge to the driver’s eye-line.Minimum Corner / Curb Radius Varies 5-10 m Existing Circular curve used. Min.value desired to ensure sufficient turning radius, reduced turning speeds, and provide pedestrian crossing comfort.Minimum Curb Extension Radius 5 m 3-5 m 5 m Ensure street cleaning vehicles can maneuver properly along the edges of the curb.Minimum Curb Extension Offset Distance 2.2 m 1.5-2.2 m 2.5 m Distance may be extended to accomodate available parking space.Through Lane Width 3.5 m 3.0-3.7 m 3.3-3.5 m Minimum through lane width = 3.3 m for roads servicing bus / larger trucks.Right-Turn Lane Width 3.5-4.0 m 3.0-3.7 m 3.3-3.5 m Can be reduced by 0.2-0.25 m from the through lane dim. / Upper limit = 4.0 m.Left-Turn Lane Width 3.2-3.5 m 3.0-3.7 m 3.6 m Can be reduced by 0.2-0.25 m from the through lane dim. / Upper limit = 4.0 m.Parking Lane Width 2.4 m 2.4 m 2.5 m Can be increased to accomodate for larger vehicles.Median Width 9 m 1-35 m 9 mConcrete Buffer Width N/A 0.3-1.0 m 0.6-1 m Minimum concrete buffer width = 0.6 m if parking lane adjacent to bike lane to accomodate for door openings.Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 6231 N/A 6550Level of Service (to Year 2040) C or better C or better C or better Based on Intersection LOS from Synchro assuming 0.5% growth rate to year 2030.Design Vehicle WB-20 WB-20 WB-20 Based on roadway classification and counts.2.0 - Bike Lane2.1 - GeneralDesign Speed Unknown 20-30 km/h 30 km/h (NB) and 35 km/h (SB)Actual Road Grade 2%/-2% 2%/-2% 2%/-2%Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) Unknown 34 m (30 km/h) / 36 m (35 km/h) 34 m (NB) / 36 m (SB) Depends on speed and gradeMinimum Horizontal Clearance from Obstruction Unknown 0.2 m 0.2 m 0.2 m to obstruction between 100mm and 650mm high and 0.5 m to obstruction greater than 750 mm highMinimum Vertical Clearance Unknown 3.6m N/ABicycle Bypass at Transit Stop Unknown 2.5 m min. psg loading zone 2.5 mMininum Raised Median Width Unknown 0.6 m 0.6 - 0.9 m Parking stops should be spaced with longitudinal gaps of 2.0 m or less2.2 - Horizontal AlignmentBasic # of Lanes 1 1 1 per directionMinimum Horizontal Radius Unknown 24 m 24 m A function of bicycle speed, superelevation, and coeficient of frictionLateral Clearance on Vertical Curve Unknown 5.9 m / 6.6 m 5.9 m / 6.6 m Depends on stopping sight distance (34m / 36m) and horizontal radius (24m). Linear interpolation applied to Table 5.5.3 values.Minimum Bike Lane Width 1.5 m 1.8 m 2.2 m Desired width = 2.0 m for uni-directional bike lanes with <150 bikes/hr - available counts at Thunderbird Blvd shows <40 bikes/hr2.3 - Vertical AlignmentRecommended Minimum Longitudinal Gradient (Grade) N/A 0.6% N/A Not a hard requirement, for drainage only. Can be reduced to 0% if thjere is adequat cross-slope and lateral slopeMinimum Crest Curve Length Unknown at least min SSD 34 m / 36 mMinimum Sag Curve (K) 2.3 / 3.1 4 Depends on design speed. K = (V^2)/390.Maximum Superlevation (If Crowned) % % 2%Cross-slope N/A 2%-4% 3%3.0 - Roadside (Furnishing + Pedestrian Through Zones)Minimum Pedestrian Through Zone Width 1.8 m 1.5 m for 2 people and 2.25 m for 3 2.35 mMinimum Furnishing Zone Width 2 m 1.5 m 1.75 m 1.2 m is the absolute minimum for small/mid trees and 1.5 mn is required for larger trees4.0 - Pavement4.1 - Vehicle and Parking LaneMinimum Pavement Thickness Unknown50mm AC Surface Course90mm AC Lower Course150mm Granular Base300mm Granular SubbaseNot Used For Higher Zoned Collector / Residential Streets50 - 75 mm AP225 mm of 25mm CBC300 mm min. of SGSB on Fine Grained Soil75 mm AP225 mm of 25mm CBC300 mm min. of SGSB on Fine Grained SoilTypical Pavement Structure Type C: Low Volume & Subdivision Roads; 20 yr Design ESAL < 100,000Standard Asphaltic Concrete Mixes and Corresponding Asphalt Cement (Surface Course) UnknownSP 12.5; PG 64-28 SP 12.5; PG 64-28 Surface course mic for resurfacing and reconstruction work on local and collector roads; traffic category B (0.3-3 millions ESAL)SP 19.0; PG 58-28 Not Used Binder course mix for all non-roadway areas including interim repair and utility cut repair workHot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Layer Thickness Unknown 40-50 mm Mnimum 40 mm Surface Course Mix typical compact layer thickness for Superpave 12.5 Type HMA; lower value is for finer graded mixes and the upper minimum value is fopr coarses graded mixes4.2 - Protected Bike LaneMinimum Pavement Thickness Unknown 50mm MMCD Upper Course #2/9.5mm150mm Granular Base50mm MMCD Upper Course #2/9.5mm150mm Granular Base4.3 - SidewalkMinimum Pavement Thickness Unknown 100 mm Concrete 100 mm Concrete5.0 - Intersection Design5.1 - Intersection Horizontal AlignmentIntersecting Angle Unknown 70-110 degrees 70-110 degreesTangent Length Unknown 20 m 20 mMaximum Deflection Angle across Intersection Unknown 3° to 5° 3° to 5°5.2 - Intersection Vertical Alignment Minimum Cross Slope of Both Roadways Unknown 0.5 % 0.5 %Change in Rate of Superelvation Unknown 0.020 /m/10m length 0.020 /m/10m length For a design speed of 50 km/hMaximum grade change in intersection Unknown 3-4% 3-4%Minimum grade along curb returns Unknown 0.5 % 0.5 %Grade at vehicle stops Unknown 0.5 % - 3% 0.5 % - 3%5.3 - Tapers and Auxillary LanesRT Taper Ratio (w/o Auxilliary Lane) Unknown 15:1 15:1 For a design speed of 50 km/hRT Taper Length (w/o Auxilliary Lane) Unknown 53 m 53 m For a design speed of 50 km/h and lane width = 3.5mRT Taper Horizontal Radius((w/o Auxilliary Lane) Unknown 500 m 500 m For a design speed of 50 km/hRT Taper Ratio Range (w/ Auxilliary Lane) Unknown 11:1 - 17:1 11:1 - 17:1 For a design speed of 50 km/hRT Parallel Lane Length (w/ Auxilliary Lane) Unknown 35-75 m 35-75 m For a design speed of 50 km/hRT Taper Reverse Curve Radius(w/ Auxilliary Lane) Unknown 90-150 m 90-150 m For a design speed of 50 km/hLT Lanes Minimum Storage Length Unknown 15 m 15 mLT Lane Transition Horizontal Radius Unknown 500 m 500 m For a design speed of 50 km/hLT Taper Ratio Range Unknown 8:1 - 30:1 8:1 - 30:1 For a design speed of 50 km/hLT Bay Taper Ratio (Transition into Median) Unknown 10:1 10:1 For a design speed of 50 km/hLT Bay Taper Radius for Symmetrical Reverse Curve Unknown 90-150 m 90-150 m For a design speed of 50 km/hAppendix B - Detailed Design DrawingsPROJECT NO. 00000-00001EAST MALL REDESIGN (W16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY ROAD)UBCV SOUTH CAMPUSISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION APRIL 14, 2021(FOR CIVL 446 EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY)REV DATEABMAR 5, 2021APR 14, 2021PW16TH AVETIE-IN PROPOSED ALIGNMENT WITH EXISTING EASTMALL / W16TH AVE INTERSECTION. SAW CUT EXISTINGASPHALT AND PROVIDE LAP JOINT AT TIE-IN TO EXISTINGPAVEMENT. SEE DWG. D-445-446-304 FOR DETAILSPROVIDE ACCESS POINTS FOR CYCLISTSBETWEEN SHARED MULTI-USE PATH(MUP) AND DEDICATED BIKE LANEROW = 25.5mMAINTAIN EXISTING EAST MALL / W16THAVE INTERSECTION CONFIGURATIONPROPOSED CURB EXTENSION WITH RAIN GARDEN2.40m1.75m2.20m0.60m2.50m3.30m3.30m2.50m0.60m2.20m1.80m2.35m25.5m ROW PER SCHEMATIC CROSSSECTION LAYOUT PROVIDED BY UBCSEEDS SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAM1000+0001000+020 1000+0401000+060 1000+0801000+100 1000+120 1000+140 1000+160R = 5.0m R = 5.0mPROPOSED MEDIAN WITH RAIN GARDENPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB EXTENSION0 5 25m1:500DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPLANEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING100PL_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-101 BMATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-102NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPPPPROPOSED RECTANGULAR RAPIDFLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) CROSSWALKROW = 25.5mPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB EXTENSIONSTADIUM RDPROPOSED CURB EXTENSIONWITH RAIN GARDENBEGIN TRANSITION BETWEEN PROPOSED25.5m AND EXISTING 35m ROW WITH A100m HORIZONTAL RADIUS CURVATUREPROPOSED MEDIANWITH RAIN GARDENPROPOSED CURB EXTENSIONWITH ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE25.5m ROW PER SCHEMATIC CROSSSECTION LAYOUT PROVIDED BY UBCSEEDS SUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREMOVE EXISTING LEFT-TURNBAY PER LEFT-TURN QUEUELENGTH SYNCHRO RESULTS1100+0001100+0201100+0401100+0601200+3801200+4001200+4201000+180 1000+200 1000+220 1000+240 1000+260 1000+2801000+290TC: 1100+000.00MID: 1100+012.46CC: 1100+023.91CC: 1100+023.91MID: 1100+043.36R = 100mR = 100mR = 1.0mR = 135.0mR = 5.0m R = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0m R = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 1.5mPROPOSED CONCRETECURB EXTENSION2.40m1.75m2.20m0.60m2.50m3.30m3.30m2.50m0.60m2.20m1.80m2.35mPROPOSED SIDEWALK LETDOWN.SEE COV STANDARD DETAILED DWG.R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1 FOR DETAILS0 5 25m1:500DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPLANEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING100PL_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-102 BMATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-103MATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-101NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPPPARKING LOT (W)PROPOSED MEDIAN WITH RAIN GARDEN PROPOSED MEDIAN WITH RAIN GARDENEXISTING LEFT TURN BAY TOBE SHIFTED TOWARDS THEMEDIAN WITH REMOVAL OFCHEVRON PAINT MARKINGSROW = 35mMAINTAIN 35m ROWPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB EXTENSIONPROPOSED ELEVATED BICYCLE BYPASS AT TRANSITSTOP WITH A HORIZONTAL RADIUS CURVATURE OF 30mPROPOSED PASSENGER LOADING BAYBBPROPOSED ELEVATED BICYCLE BYPASS AT TRANSITSTOP WITH A HORIZONTAL RADIUS CURVATURE OF 24mPROPOSED PASSENGER LOADING BAYEXISTING LEFT TURN BAY TOBE SHIFTED TOWARDS THEMEDIAN WITH REMOVAL OFCHEVRON PAINT MARKINGSEAGLES DRPROPOSED RECTANGULARRAPID FLASHING BEACONS(RRFB) CROSSWALK2.40m2.30m1.00m2.50m3.50m3.50m2.50m1.00m2.30m2.40m9.00m2.60m1100+0801100+1001100+120 1100+140 1100+1601100+1801100+200 1100+220 1100+240 1100+2601200+1801200+2001200+2201200+2401200+2601200+2801200+3001200+3201200+3401200+360CT: 1100+063.81R = 0.5mR = 10.0mR = 30.0mR = 50.0mR = 2.5mR = 7.0mR = 25.0mR = 25.0mR = 10.0mR = 1.5mR = 8.5mR = 100.0mR = 5.0m R = 5.0m R = 5.0m R = 5.0m R = 5.0m R = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0m R = 1.25mR = 5.0m R = 1.25m3.6m3.6m3.9mPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB EXTENSIONPROPOSED CURB EXTENSIONWITH ABSORBENT LANDSCAPEPROPOSED CURB EXTENSIONWITH ABSORBENT LANDSCAPEPROPOSED CONCRETECURB EXTENSIONPROPOSED SIDEWALK LETDOWN.SEE COV STANDARD DETAILED DWG.R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1 FOR DETAILS0 5 25m1:500DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPLANEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING100PL_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-103 BMATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-104MATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-102NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPPPROPOSED ELEVATED BIKE LANE TRANSITIONS TOAT-GRADE BIKE LANE VIA RAMP WITH A HORIZONTALRADIUS CURVATURE OF 24m USED TO TIE-IN WITHEXISTING AT-GRADE BIKE LANE NORTH OF EASTMALL / THUNDERBIRD BLVD INTERSECTIONPROPOSED AT-GRADE BIKE LANE TRANSITIONSTO AN ELEVATED BIKE LANE VIA RAMP WITH AHORIZONTAL RADIUS CURVATURE OF 33m USEDTO TIE-IN WITH EXISTING BIKE LANE NORTH OFEAST MALL / THUNDERBIRD BLVD INTERSECTIONPROPOSED MEDIAN WITH RAIN GARDENROW = 38mPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB EXTENSIONLOGAN LNMAINTAIN CONCRETE CURBTO FACILITATE RIGHT-IN /RIGHT-OUT MOVEMENTPROPOSED CONCRETE CURB EXTENSIONTHUNDERBIRD BLVD2.40mVARIES (TYP. 3.00m)2.30m1.00m2.50m3.50m9.00m3.50m2.50m1.00m2.30m2.40m2.60mMAINTAIN 38m ROW1100+280 1100+300 1100+320 1100+340 1100+360 1100+380 1100+400 1100+4201200+0001200+0201200+0401200+0601200+0801200+1001200+1201200+1401200+160SAW CUT EXISTING ASPHALT ANDPROVIDE LAP JOINT AT TIE-IN TOEXISTING PAVEMENT. SEE DWG.D-445-446-304 FOR DETAILSR = 1.0mR = 1.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0mR = 5.0m R = 1.25mMAINTAIN EXISTINGOVERHEAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL0 5 25m1:500DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPLANEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING100PL_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-104 BMATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-105MATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-103NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONCT: 1400+053.434 WAY4 WAYPROPOSED PAINTED BUFFER BETWEENBIKE LANE AND VEHICLE LANEMODIFIED PAINT-MARKINGAFTER MEDIANVEHICLE LANE TO TRANSITION TOWARDSTHE EXISTING MEDIAN AT A HORIZONTALRADIUS CURVATURE OF 550m TO TIE-INWITH THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENTROW = 24mSOPRON LNAGRONOMY RDMAINTAIN EXISTING CONFIGURATIONNORTH OF SOPRON LNMAINTAIN 24m ROW4 WAY4 WAY1300+0201300+0401400+0201400+0401500+0001500+0201500+0401500+0601600+0001600+0201600+040TC: 1400+000.001400+000MID: 1400+015.23CC: 1400+030.46MID:1400+042.95CC: 1400+030.46R = 550mR = 550m1300+0000 5 25m1:500DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPLANEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING100PL_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-105 BMATCH-LINE SEE DWG. D-445-446-104NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION0010 50mH 1:10001 5mV 1:100DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPROFILEEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING200PR_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-201 BL1000-LINE PROFILE (W16TH AVE TO STADIUM RD)NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION0010 50mH 1:10001 5mV 1:100DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPROFILEEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING200PR_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-202 BL1100-LINE PROFILE (STADIUM RD TO EAGLES DR)NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION0010 50mH 1:10001 5mV 1:100DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPROFILEEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING200PR_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-203 BL1100-LINE PROFILE (EAGLES DR TO THUNDERBIRD BLVD)NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION0010 50mH 1:10001 5mV 1:100DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPROFILEEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING200PR_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-204 BL1200-LINE PROFILE (THUNDERBIRD BLVD TO EAGLES DR)NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION0010 50mH 1:10001 5mV 1:100DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVPROFILEEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING200PR_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-205 BL1200-LINE PROFILE (EAGLES DR TO STADIUM RD)NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTION, SEE DWG. D-445-446-301 TO 304 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONL1000-LINEW16TH AVE TO STADIUM RDCROSS SECTION2.40 1.75 2.20 0.60 2.50 3.30 3.30 2.50 0.60 2.20 1.80 2.35EAST MALL (L1000-LINE)TRAVEL LANETRAVEL LANEPARKING LANEBIKE LANELANDSCAPE ZONESIDEWALKPARKING LANECONCRETE CURB (AND RAIN GARDEN)BIKE LANELANDSCAPE ZONESIDEWALKCL2%2%2% 2%75mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT225mm - 25mm INTERMEDIATE CRUSHED BASE COURSE300mm - SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE50mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT150mm - GRANULAR BASE100mm - CONCRETE50mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT150mm - GRANULAR BASE100mm - CONCRETE0.150.15CONCRETE CURB (AND RAIN GARDEN)ROW = 25.500 5m1:1001DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVCROSS SECTIONEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING300CS_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-301 BNOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONEAST MALL (L1100-LINE)TRAVEL LANEPARKING LANECONCRETE CURBBIKE LANELANDSCAPE ZONESIDEWALK2%2%0.1575mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT225mm - 25mm INTERMEDIATE CRUSHED BASE COURSE300mm - SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE50mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT150mm - GRANULAR BASE100mm - CONCRETE2.602.402.301.002.503.502.40 2.30 1.00 2.50 3.50PARKING LANECONCRETE CURBBIKE LANESIDEWALKEAST MALL (L1200-LINE)TRAVEL LANE2%2%50mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT150mm - GRANULAR BASE100mm - CONCRETE75mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT225mm - 25mm INTERMEDIATE CRUSHED BASE COURSE300mm - SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE0.15L1100-LINE AND L1200-LINESTADIUM RD TO EAGLES DRCROSS SECTIONSEE RAIN GARDEN DRAWING FOR DETAIL9.00ROW = 35.000 5m1:1001DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVCROSS SECTIONEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING300CS_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-302 BNOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION2.40 3.00 2.30 1.00 2.50 3.50PARKING LANECONCRETE CURBBIKE LANELANDSCAPE ZONESIDEWALKEAST MALL (L1200-LINE)TRAVEL LANE50mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT150mm - GRANULAR BASE100mm - CONCRETE75mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT225mm - 25mm INTERMEDIATE CRUSHED BASE COURSE300mm - SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE2%2%0.15EAST MALL (L1100-LINE)TRAVEL LANEPARKING LANECONCRETE CURBBIKE LANELANDSCAPE ZONESIDEWALK2%2%0.1575mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT225mm - 25mm INTERMEDIATE CRUSHED BASE COURSE300mm - SELECT GRANULAR SUB BASE50mm - ASPHALT PAVEMENT150mm - GRANULAR BASE100mm - CONCRETE2.602.402.301.002.503.50L1100-LINE AND L1200-LINEEAGLES DR TO THUNDERBIRD BLVDCROSS SECTIONSEE RAIN GARDEN DRAWING FOR DETAIL9.00ROW = 38.000 5m1:1001DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVCROSS SECTIONEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING300CS_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-303 BNOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPAVEMENT SAW CUT AND LAP JOINT DETAIL(SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS)MILL LAP JOINT TO 30mm DEPTHKEYED INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT(MILL, TACK, AND OVERLAP)75mm PROPOSEDASPHALT PAVEMENT225mm - 25mm INTERMEDIATE CBC300mm SGSBSAW CUT LINEEDGE OF MILLING0.300.305:1EXISTING ASPHALTPAVEMENTDESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVCROSS SECTIONEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING300CS_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-142021-04-14C.Q.B.O.B.O.C.Q.2021-04-142021-04-142021-04-142021-04-1420-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-446-304 B1:15NOTES:1. FOR ROADWAY PLAN, SEE DWG. D-445-446-101 TO 105 FOR DETAILS.2. FOR ROADWAY PROFILE, SEE DWG. D-445-446-201 TO 205 FOR DETAILS.3. FOR GREEN STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (GSI), SEE DWG. D-401 TO 403 FOR DETAILS.4. FOR PEDESTRIAN COVERED WALKWAY, SEE DWG. D-501 TO 503 FOR DETAILS.5. FOR STANDARD DETAIL DRAWINGS:5.1. STREET LIGHTS - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. SSD-R.E.1 TO R.E.4 (PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS TO BE PLACED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST MALLFROM W16TH AVE TO STADIUM ROAD AT 45 m INTERVAL AND 0.5 m FROM THE ABSORBENT LANDSCAPE EDGE NEAREST TO ROADWAY).5.2. RECTANGULAR FLASHING BEACON - SEE SURREY MMCD DWG. CCSD-14d.5.3. CURBS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. C4.1 AND C19.1.5.4. SIDEWALK LETDOWN - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R4.1, R4.2, AND R7.1.5.5. SIGN POSTS + SIGNS - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R8.1 TO 8.16 AND C19.2 TO 19.3.5.6. PARKING METER LAYOUT - SEE CITY OF VANCOUVER STANDARD DETAIL DWG. R9.1.A 21/03/05 Submission for Design Summary ReportB 21/04/14 Submission for Final Design ReportPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONPRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSIONFINISHEDGRADESTRUCTURALBASE PLATE20mm CONCRETEGROUTBEARING CAPACITYCONFIRM WITHGEOTECHNICALENGINEERROUND STRUCTURALCOLUMN HS 219x9.5GUSSETPLATETAPEREDCANTILEVER STEELBEAM HS 178X127X9.580182219STRUCTURALBEAMHS 102x51x9.5CONTINUOUSLINEARLIGHT BEAMSUPPORTING JOISTHS 76x51x3.2571mm o/cWITH SLOT TO INSERTGLASS PANEL14 mm TEMPEREDLAMINATED GLASSPANEL (TRANSLUCENT)32035002500500B-A-C-CANOPY ELEVATION VIEWSCALE: 1:30" DIA. A325 BOLTSCALE: 1:20FOOTING DETAILC-400 DPX1200X12007-15M BARS TOP ANDBOTTOM75 COVER150 DPX350X350 CONC.PEDESTAL 10M VERT.AND LATERAL TIES15 GROUT6FINISHEDGRADESCALE: 1:5CONNECTION DETAILA-L51x51x6.4STRUCTURAL BEAMHS 102x51x9.512" DIA. A325 BOLTSCALE: 1:16CANTILEVER-COLUMN CONNECTIONB-1" GUSSET PLATE1" PLATE WELDED TOCOLUMN42MM DIA., A325 BOLT84012924x 16MM DIA.A325 BLINDBOLT88855FILLET WELDALL AROUNDSLEEVE8MM THICK CUSTOM HSSSLEEVE (MALE) FLUSH WITHCANTILEVER INNER WALL10MM PLATEWELDED TO BEAMHS203x102x4.8D-1251016MM COPE INCOLUMN FORWELD SPACE6010MM PLATEWELDED TOBEAM, SLOTTEDINTO COLUMNCUT OPENING5510MM SHEAR TABWELDED TO COLUMN16MM DIA. A325 BOLTSCALE: 1:10BEAM SLOT DETAILD-DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVWALKWAYEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING500WW_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2021-04-112021-04-11M.L.B.O.B.O.M.L.2020-12-032021-04-112021-04-112021-03-1120-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-501 -1:3011 DEGREES SLOPEGUTTERSTRUCTURAL STEELCOLUMN (TYP.) CONTINUOUS LINEARLIGHT BEAMSUPPORTING JOISTWITH SLOT FORGLASS PANEL (TYP.)2450CANTILEVER BEAM(TYP.)LAMINATEDGLASSPANELSTRUCTURALBEAMHS 51X25X4.8219CANOPY PLAN VIEWSCALE: 1:40E-10MM GUSSET PLATE16MM DIA. BOLT1206060219SCALE: 1:10BEAM SPLICE DETAILE-16MM DIA. BOLTCUSTOM HSS SLEEVE (MALE)WITH 4.8MM WALL THICKNESSSLOTTED INTO HSS10 MM PLATE BEVELWELDED TOCONNECTING BEAM5555HS203x102x4.8BEAMHS203x102x4.8BEAM100105DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVWALKWAYEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING500WW_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2020-12-032020-12-03M.L.B.O.B.O.M.L.2020-12-032020-12-032020-12-032020-12-0320-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-502 -1:40DESIGNEDSIGNATUREDATE REVISIONSREVREG DRAWING NUMBERPROJECT NUMBERFILE NUMBERDATESENIOR DESIGNERSCALEQUALITY CONTROLQUALITY ASSURANCEDRAWNDATEDATEDATEDATECAD FILENAMEDATEUBC SEEDSSUSTAINABILITY PROGRAMREVWALKWAYEAST MALLW16TH AVE TO AGRONOMY RDSOUTHERN CAMPUSMUNICIPAL ENGINEERING500WW_CIVL-445-446 - EAST MALL2020-12-032020-12-03M.L.B.O.B.O.M.L.2020-12-032020-12-032020-12-032020-12-0320-0001 00000-00001 R D-445-445-503 -1:401.0 FabricationFabrication shall be performed in an enclosed area that is adequately heated.Prior to fabrication, the welders’ and welding operators’ qualifications, shop drawings, welding procedures, millcertificates, and welding consumable certificates shall be submitted for the Owner’s review.In advance of fabrication, the Owner will convene a prefabrication meeting with the Contractor, the Designer to reviewissues such as, quality control, welding procedures, mill certificates and heat numbers, splices, coatings, shop trialassembly, and schedule.The Contractor shall provide a schedule of fabrication to the Owner in the form of a Gantt Chart updated on no lessthan a monthly basis.1.1 Shop DrawingsShop drawings for the walkway shall be developed from a 3D model. The model shall include each element andassembled product. Before the geometry is finalized, as-built geometry and elevations of the structure shall beconfirmed by the Contractor. Discrepancies shall be submitted to the Owner for review and accepted by the Engineer.Shop drawings shall show all information and details needed for the fabrication including member shapes, dimensions,connection details, material, arraignment of member locations, faster details, weld details and symbols, and coatingdetails.1.2 Bolt HolesClause 11.4.8 in Division II of AASHTO shall apply except that all bolt holes in load carryingsegments of main members and any material welded to main members shall be drilled full size or subpunched andreamed to full size. All holes in member splices shall be circular and perpendicular to the member and shall bedeburred to ensure a proper faying surface.Standard holes for high strength bolts shall be of a diameter not more than 2 mm in excess of the nominal boltdiameter, except that the following bolt/hole combinations will be permitted:a) either 3/4 inch or M20 bolts in 22 mm holes;b) either 7/8 inch or M22 bolts in 24 mm holes;c) either 1 inch or M24 bolts in 27 mm holes;d) either 1-1/8 inch or M30 bolts in 32 mm holes.Punched holes shall be clean cut, without torn or ragged edges. The diameter of the die shall not exceed the diameterof the punch by more than 2 mm. If a punched hole must be enlarged to admit a high strength bolt, it shall be reamed.1.3 Shop Trial AssemblyThe structure shall be progressively assembled in accordance with the following requirements:Before trial assembly starts, the Contractor shall submit to the Owner’s representative for review by the Engineer adetailed plan showing the proposed trial assembly arrangement and procedures.Field connections shall be pre-assembled prior to erection to verify the geometry of the completed structure.Holes for splices shall be drilled during trial assembly in the shop, or sub-drilled and then reamed to full size whileassembled.1.4 Surface FinishesAll steel components shall be blast cleaned after fabrication. Shop painting shall conform with the BC MOTISpecifications, Painting.1.5 Fabrication TolerancesDimensions shown on the Plans are at a reference temperature of 0 °C. The Contractor shall make the necessarydimensional adjustments for actual temperatures at the time and place of fabrication. Normal tolerance for structuralsteel fabrication and fitting between hole groups will be ± 3 mm unless specified otherwise. Dimensional tolerancesfor structural members shall comply with the appropriate tolerances as specified in AWS D1.5, Section 3.5, andCAN/CSA-S6-00, Section 10.24.72.0 Materials2.1 Welding ConsumablesAll electrodes shall match the base metal specified in accordance with CSA W59, Table 12.1. The deposited weldmetal shall provide strength, ductility, impact toughness, and corrosion resistance equivalent to the base metal.Welding consumables for all processes shall be certified by the Canadian Welding Bureau (CWB) as complyingwith the requirements of CSA W48.2.2 High Strength BoltsUnless otherwise specified on the Plans, uncoated high strength bolts shall conform to therequirements of ASTM A490, Type 3 (or ASTM A490M Type 3 of equivalent size), weathering steel, withcompatible nuts and hardened washers. All bolts and compatible washers and nuts shall be either metric orimperial.Certified mill test reports for the fastener material shall be provided. The supplier shall provide a lot numberappearing on the shipping package and a certification noting when and where all testing was done, includingrotational capacity tests.2.3 Structural SteelStructural material, either plain or fabricated, shall be stored above the ground in an upright and shored positionupon platforms, skids, or other supports. It shall be kept free from dirt and other foreign matter, and shall beprotected as far as practical from corrosion. Long members shall be supported on skids placed near enoughtogether to prevent overstress from deflection.3.0 Welded ConstructionThe quality and details of welds shall be in accordance with AWS D1.5.Welding procedures shall be in accordance with the requirements of CSA W47.1 and thisspecification. Prequalified joint geometry and parameters shall be accepted as specified by CSA StandardW59-03.Welding procedures shall be submitted for each type of weld used in the structure. Theprocedures shall bear the approval of the CWB and shall be accompanied by documentary proof that theprocedures have been qualified by the CWB at the plant where the Work is to be carried out. Welding proceduresshall be reviewed by the Owner’s Representative prior to use on the structure.The procedures shall include the following information: joint type, surface preparation, welding process, weldingposition, base metal specification, welding consumable specification and size, preheat requirements, amperageand voltage requirements, speed, polarity, and welding equipment. Additional information, as described in CSAW47.1-03, Appendix C, shall also be included in the procedures.Tack welds, where permitted, shall be done by qualified welders using the smallest sizeweld required to hold the components of the assembly together. Tack welds and temporary welds shall be subjectto the requirements of AWS D1.5 Clauses 3.3.7, 3.3.8 and 12.13.Appendix C - Synchro Analysis Results TableAppendix D - PC SWMM / QGIS Inputs and ResultsEvapotranspiration ParametersMonth Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecET (mm/d) 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.3 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.2 2.2 1 0.5 0.4Rain Garden ParametersRain Garden ParametersLayer Parameter Value Source NotesSurfaceBerm height (mm) 203.2 Rain Gardens - A How to Manual [3] Typical ValueVegetation Volume (fraction) 0.1 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix C.13 [4] dense vegetation growthSurface roughness (Manning's n) 0.24 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.6 [4] dense grassSurface slope (percent) 2 Default value in SWMM Typical ValueSoilThickness (mm) 450 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix C.13 Typical ValuePorosity (volume fraction) 0.453 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2 [4] Sandy LoamField capacity (volume fraction) 0.19 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2 Sandy LoamWilting point (volume fraction) 0.085 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2 Sandy LoamConductivity (mm/hr) 11 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2 Sandy LoamConductivity slope 27 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix C.13 0.48(%Sand) + 0.85(%Clay).Suction head (mm) 110 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2 Sandy LoamStorageThickness (mm) 200 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix C.13 Typical ValueVoid ratio (voids/solids) 0.75 Default value in SWMM Typical Valuerate (mm/hr) 10.922 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2Minimum infiltration rate ofsurrounding soilClogging factor 0 - -Absorbent Landscape ParametersHorton Infiltration ParametersParameter Value Source NotesMaximum Infiltration Rate (mm/hr) 25.4 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix C.8 [4] Moist Loam soilMinimum Infiltration Rate (mm/hr) 10.9 SWMM User's Manual Version 5.1 Appendix A.2 Saturated hydraulic conductivity of LoamDecay Constant 4 Default value in SWMM Typical ValueDry Time (days) 7 Default value in SWMM Typical Value1Subcatchment ParametersSubcatchments ParametersRoadwayTotal Area(m2)Rain Garden(m2)AbsorbentLandscape (m2) OutletWidth(m) Flow Length (m)Slope(%)Imperv. AreaTreated (%)West 16th Ave to Stadium Rd (S1) 6756 249 1132 J6 504.8 13.384 2 100Stadium Rd to Eagle Dr (S2) 4797 420 817 J5 286.8 16.726 2 100Eagles Dr to Thunderbird Blvd (S3) 3536 300 463 S2 194.6 18.119 2 100Thunderbird Blvd Intersection (S4) 9477 820 3131 S3 425.4 22.278 2 100Thunderbird Blvd to Agronomy Rd (S5) 7663 0 4412 J2 302.8 25.307 2 100Junction InputsName Invert Elev. (m) Rim Elev. (m) Depth (m)J1 93.5 95.5 2J2 93 95 2J3 92.8 94.8 2J4 93 95 2J5 90.5 92.5 2J6 89.7 91.7 2J7 87 89 2J8 84 86 2Conduit InputsName Inlet NodeOutletNodeLength(m)Roughness Inlet Offset (m) Outlet Offset (m) Cross-SectionDiameter(m) Slope (%)C1 J1 J2 122.155 0.01 0.5 0.5 CIRCULAR 0.45 0.23C2 J2 J3 41.358 0.01 0.5 0.5 CIRCULAR 0.45 0.28C3 J4 J5 221.519 0.01 0.5 0.5 CIRCULAR 0.45 0.65C4 J5 J6 133.361 0.01 0.5 0.5 CIRCULAR 0.45 0.34C5 J6 J7 213.463 0.01 0.5 0.5 CIRCULAR 0.45 0.72C6 J7 J8 122.388 0.01 0.5 0.5 CIRCULAR 0.45 1.402PCSWMM ResultsArea(m2)Precip.(mm)Runon(mm)Evap.(mm)Infiltration (mm)ImpervRunoff(mm)PervRunoff(mm)RunoffDepth(mm)RunoffVolume(ML) GSI?Precip.(m3)Runoff(m3)TotalCollectedPre-Dev.PeakRunoff(m³/s)PeakRunoff(m³/s)Post-Dev. LevelsImproved?6-month/24-hour precipitation eventS1 6756 43.6 0 0.79 19.61 33.98 27.36 10.43 0.07 YES 294.570.4650890.24%0.02 0.02 YESS2 4797 43.6 0 0.77 25.13 31.99 25.55 0 0 YES 209.1 0 0.01 0 YESS3 3536 43.6 0 0.78 21.93 33.91 29.04 0 0 YES 154.1 0 0.01 0 YESS4 9477 43.6 0 0.67 30.82 25.01 14.27 0 0 YES 413.1 0 0.03 0 YESS5 7663 43.6 0 0.47 34.38 18.11 8.7 8.7 0.07 NO 334.1 66.66 0.02 0.02 YES2-year/24-hour precipitation eventS1 6756 56.9 0 0.79 20.1 44.56 40.02 23.01 0.16 YES 384.4 155.484.15%0.02 0.02 YESS2 4797 56.9 0 0.78 26.56 41.95 37.54 0.12 0 YES 272.9 0.57 0.02 0 YESS3 3536 56.9 0 0.78 23.17 44.47 41.1 3.63 0.01 YES 201.1 12.83 0.01 0 YESS4 9477 56.9 0 0.75 37.93 32.79 24.89 0 0 YES 539.2 0 0.03 0 YESS5 7663 56.9 0 0.56 40.38 23.75 15.9 15.9 0.12 NO 436.0 121.84 0.02 0.02 YES5-year/24-hour precipitation eventS1 6756 72.19 0 0.79 20.47 56.73 54.61 37.9 0.26 YES 487.7 256.0573.13%0.03 0.03 YESS2 4797 72.19 0 0.78 27.58 53.41 51.35 13.27 0.06 YES 346.2 63.65 0.02 0.01 YESS3 3536 72.19 0 0.79 24.01 56.61 54.99 17.57 0.06 YES 255.26 62.12 0.02 0.01 YESS4 9477 72.19 0 0.77 39.58 41.74 38.33 3.71 0.04 YES 684.1 35.15 0.04 0 YESS5 7663 72.19 0 0.67 44.28 30.23 27.18 27.18 0.21 NO 553.1 208.2 0.03 0.03 YES3Junction 1 to 3 During 5-year 24-hour precipitation (Left)Junction 4 to 8 During 5-year 24-hour precipitation (Right)QGIS Flow accumulation model of UBC Campus (Opacity of Whitelines = Density of Flow)4Appendix E - Pedestrian Walkway CalculationsCantilever Structure Load DemandBending Moment DiagramAxial Force DiagramBeam Load DemandSteel Section ChecksBeam Column (P-Delta Effects) CheckSeismic Lateral Force CalculationConnections Calculation - Angles[see seismic lateral load next page]Gusset PlateNote: Gusset plateassumed to act as a trussBeam slot connection reducescolumn strength againstcantilever tension (shown inblue). Column ability to resistcantilever tension is the maincheck here.Overhead viewof ColumnCut-out for platereduces strengthCantileverPlane of shear failureBending momentinduced by cantilevertensionAppendix F - Quantity Takeoff and Cost EstimateAppendix G - Detailed Construction ScheduleInputsIntermediate CalculationsOutputsProject Start Date Monday, May 10, 2021Total Number of Work Days 185Done Before… Monday, January 31, 2022Task ID Task Name Min (Days) Max (Days) Most Likely Duration (Days) Simulated Days ES EF LS LF TF Critical? Labels ES Earliest Done by… Latest Date Done by… Early Duration (Inc. Time Off) Float (Inc. Time Off)0 Start 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.0 0 0 01 Complete bidding to contractors 1 10 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 5 8.3 127.5 0 8 0 Critical Complete bidding to contractors* 2021-05-10 2021-05-20 2021-05-20 10 02 Mobilization 2 4 3 4 1 8.35 0 0 0 0 0 8.35 12 3 11.9 8 12 0 Critical Mobilization* 2021-05-20 2021-05-26 2021-05-26 6 03 Setup traffic controls 1 1 1 1 2 11.9 0 0 0 0 0 11.9 13 4 12.9 12 13 0 Critical Setup traffic controls* 2021-05-26 2021-05-27 2021-05-27 1 04 Construction stakeout 2 4 3 2 3 12.9 0 0 0 0 0 12.9 15 6 15.0 13 15 0 Critical Construction stakeout* 2021-05-27 2021-06-01 2021-06-01 5 05 Stockpile precast material (walkway) 21 42 35 31 1 8.35 0 0 0 0 0 8.35 39 34 158.6 128 159 119 Stockpile precast material (walkway) 2021-05-20 2021-07-06 2021-12-24 47 1716 A1 Northbound Demolitions 5 10 8 5 4 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 20 7 20.3 15 20 0 Critical A1 Northbound Demolitions* 2021-06-01 2021-06-08 2021-06-08 7 07 A1 Utility Relocations 7 14 12 12 6 20.3 0 0 0 0 0 20.3 32 8 32.1 20 32 0 Critical A1 Utility Relocations* 2021-06-08 2021-06-24 2021-06-24 16 08 A1 Install Stormwater Systems 2 4 3 3 7 32.1 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 36 9 35.5 32 36 0 Critical A1 Install Stormwater Systems* 2021-06-24 2021-06-29 2021-06-29 5 09 A1 Pavement Overlay 5 8 7 5 8 35.5 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 41 10 40.9 36 41 0 Critical A1 Pavement Overlay* 2021-06-29 2021-07-07 2021-07-07 8 010 A1 Curb Repair 2 5 4 4 9 40.9 0 0 0 0 0 40.9 45 11 45.1 41 45 0 Critical A1 Curb Repair* 2021-07-07 2021-07-14 2021-07-14 7 011 A1 Southbound Demolitions 5 10 8 8 10 45.1 0 0 0 0 0 45.1 53 12 53.2 45 53 0 Critical A1 Southbound Demolitions* 2021-07-14 2021-07-26 2021-07-26 12 012 A1 Install Stormwater Systems 2 4 3 3 11 53.2 0 0 0 0 0 53.2 56 13 56.2 53 56 0 Critical A1 Install Stormwater Systems* 2021-07-26 2021-07-29 2021-07-29 3 013 A1 Pavement Overlay 5 8 7 7 12 56.2 0 0 0 0 0 56.2 63 14 63.4 56 63 0 Critical A1 Pavement Overlay* 2021-07-29 2021-08-10 2021-08-10 12 014 A1 Curb Repair 2 5 4 4 13 63.4 0 0 0 0 0 63.4 68 15 67.6 63 68 0 Critical A1 Curb Repair* 2021-08-10 2021-08-16 2021-08-16 6 015 A2 Northbound Demolitions 5 10 8 8 14 67.6 0 0 0 0 0 67.6 76 16 75.8 68 76 0 Critical A2 Northbound Demolitions* 2021-08-16 2021-08-26 2021-08-26 10 016 A2 Utility Relocations 7 14 12 10 15 75.8 0 0 0 0 0 75.8 86 17 85.9 76 86 0 Critical A2 Utility Relocations* 2021-08-26 2021-09-10 2021-09-10 15 017 A2 Install Stormwater Systems 2 4 3 3 16 85.9 0 0 0 0 0 85.9 89 18 88.7 86 89 0 Critical A2 Install Stormwater Systems* 2021-09-10 2021-09-15 2021-09-15 5 018 A2 Pavement Overlay 5 8 7 6 17 88.7 0 0 0 0 0 88.7 95 19 95.1 89 95 0 Critical A2 Pavement Overlay* 2021-09-15 2021-09-24 2021-09-24 9 019 A2 Curb Repair 2 5 4 4 18 95.1 0 0 0 0 0 95.1 99 20 99.2 95 99 0 Critical A2 Curb Repair* 2021-09-24 2021-09-30 2021-09-30 6 020 A2 Southbound Demolitions 5 10 8 7 19 99.2 0 0 0 0 0 99.2 107 21 106.6 99 107 0 Critical A2 Southbound Demolitions* 2021-09-30 2021-10-12 2021-10-12 12 021 A2 Install Stormwater Systems 2 4 3 2 20 107 0 0 0 0 0 107 109 22 109.0 107 109 0 Critical A2 Install Stormwater Systems* 2021-10-12 2021-10-15 2021-10-15 3 022 A2 Pavement Overlay 5 8 7 7 21 109 0 0 0 0 0 109 116 23 116.0 109 116 0 Critical A2 Pavement Overlay* 2021-10-15 2021-10-25 2021-10-25 10 023 A2 Curb Repair 2 5 4 3 22 116 0 0 0 0 0 116 119 24 119.3 116 119 0 Critical A2 Curb Repair* 2021-10-25 2021-10-29 2021-10-29 4 024 A3 Northbound Demolitions 5 10 8 9 23 119 0 0 0 0 0 119 128 25 127.9 119 128 0 Critical A3 Northbound Demolitions* 2021-10-29 2021-11-10 2021-11-10 12 025 A3 Utility Relocations 7 14 12 11 24 128 0 0 0 0 0 128 139 26 139.0 128 139 0 Critical A3 Utility Relocations* 2021-11-10 2021-11-26 2021-11-26 16 026 A3 Install Stormwater Systems 2 4 3 3 25 139 0 0 0 0 0 139 142 27 142.1 139 142 0 Critical A3 Install Stormwater Systems* 2021-11-26 2021-12-02 2021-12-02 6 027 A3 Pavement Overlay 5 8 7 6 26 142 0 0 0 0 0 142 148 28 148.2 142 148 0 Critical A3 Pavement Overlay* 2021-12-02 2021-12-10 2021-12-10 8 028 A3 Curb Repair 2 5 4 4 27 148 0 0 0 0 0 148 152 29 152.3 148 152 0 Critical A3 Curb Repair* 2021-12-10 2021-12-16 2021-12-16 6 029 A3 Southbound Demolitions 5 10 8 8 28 152 0 0 0 0 0 152 160 30 160.0 152 160 0 Critical A3 Southbound Demolitions* 2021-12-16 2021-12-28 2021-12-28 12 030 A3 Install Stormwater Systems 2 4 3 3 29 160 0 0 0 0 0 160 163 31 33 162.6 168.8 160 163 0 Critical A3 Install Stormwater Systems* 2021-12-28 2021-12-30 2021-12-30 2 031 A3 Pavement Overlay 5 8 7 6 30 163 0 0 0 0 0 163 169 32 37 168.6 170.0 163 169 0 Critical A3 Pavement Overlay* 2021-12-30 2022-01-07 2022-01-07 8 032 A3 Curb Repair 2 5 4 3 31 169 0 0 0 0 0 169 172 38 172.1 169 172 0 Critical A3 Curb Repair* 2022-01-07 2022-01-13 2022-01-13 6 033 Fill topsoil, seed rain garden 2 4 3 3 30 163 0 0 0 0 0 163 166 38 172.1 169 172 6 Fill topsoil, seed rain garden 2021-12-30 2022-01-04 2022-01-13 5 934 B1 Demolish curb for walkway footings 2 4 3 4 5 39.4 0 0 0 0 0 39.4 43 35 162.2 159 162 119 B1 Demolish curb for walkway footings2021-07-06 2021-07-12 2021-12-30 6 17135 B1 Install walkway footing + columns 5 9 8 9 34 43 0 0 0 0 0 43 52 36 171.0 162 171 119 B1 Install walkway footing + columns 2021-07-12 2021-07-22 2022-01-12 10 17436 B1 Install walkway roof 1 3 2 1 35 51.8 0 0 0 0 0 51.8 53 38 172.1 171 172 119 B1 Install walkway roof 2021-07-22 2021-07-23 2022-01-13 1 17437 Re-paint road markings 2 3 3 2 31 169 0 0 0 0 0 169 171 38 172.1 170 172 1 Re-paint road markings 2022-01-07 2022-01-11 2022-01-13 4 238 Field inspection and as built survey 3 7 6 5 32 33 36 37 172 166 52.9 171 0 0 172 177 39 177.1 172 177 0 Critical Field inspection and as built survey* 2022-01-13 2022-01-20 2022-01-20 7 039 Demobilize 7 10 9 8 38 177 0 0 0 0 0 177 185 40 184.9 177 185 0 Critical Demobilize* 2022-01-20 2022-01-31 2022-01-31 11 040 Finish 0 0 0 0 39 185 0 0 0 0 0 185 185 185 185 0 CriticalHolidays in BCNew Year's 2021-01-01Family Day 2021-02-15Good Friday 2021-04-02Victoria Day 2021-05-24Canada Day 2021-07-01BC Day 2021-08-02Labour Day 2021-09-06Thanksgiving Day 2021-10-11Remembrance Day 2021-11-11Christmas Day 2021-12-25Axis Bounds in Number2021-05-10 44326.002022-01-31 44592.00Immediate Predecssor Immediate SuccessorEF of Predecessor LS of SuccessorValues for Calendar CalculationsStatistic Work Days… Done by…Average 186 2022-01-315% probability project is done by… 177 2022-01-1950% probability project is done by… 186 2022-02-0195% probability project is done by… 193 2022-02-110%25%50%75%100%165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200ProbabilityTotal Work Days: Cumulative Distribution0%25%50%75%100%12-30-21 1-9-22 1-19-22 1-29-22 2-8-22 2-18-22 2-28-22ProbabilityCompletion Date: Cumulative DistributionAppendix H - Roadway Life Cycle AnalysisGeneral Inputs Expected LCC and GWP for Each Design and Trigger RoughnessAnalysis Period 50Number of LCA Simulations 1000Roadway InputsDimensionsRoad Length (mi) 0.56Lane Width (ft) 11.3Number of Lanes 2Shoulder Width (ft) 0Number of Shoulders 0ConditionBase Aggregate Bulk Density (kg/m^3) 1500Percent Bitumen by Mass (%) 6.00%Contructed IRI (m/km) 1Maximum IRI (m/km)Design InputsDesign 1Asphalt Thickness (in) 1.96Asphalt Structural-Layer Coefficient 0.4Asphalt Drainage Coefficient 1Aggregate Thickness (in) 6Aggregate Structural-Layer Coefficient 0.1 CDF of Total GWP for Best DesignsAggregate Drainage Coefficient 1SN1 1.38Design 2Asphalt Thickness (in) 2.36Asphalt Structural-Layer Coefficient 0.4Asphalt Drainage Coefficient 1Aggregate Thickness (in) 6Aggregate Structural-Layer Coefficient 0.1Aggregate Drainage Coefficient 1.00SN2 1.54Design 3 (Selected Design)Asphalt Thickness (in) 2.756Asphalt Structural-Layer Coefficient 0.4Asphalt Drainage Coefficient 1Aggregate Thickness (in) 6Aggregate Structural-Layer Coefficient 0.1Aggregate Drainage Coefficient 1SN3 1.70CDF of Total Cost for Best DesignsTraffic InputsSpeed Limit (mph) 30Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT)Initial AADT 6231Initial Percent of Small Trucks 0.00%Initial Percent of Medium Trucks 1.00%Initial Percent of Large Trucks 0.00%Congestion Inputs GWP for Best DesignsDurationConstruction Duration 43Maintenance Duration 14Traffic ImpactsPercent of Passenger Cars Impacted 16.70%Percent of Trucks Impacted 16.70%Fuel EconomyInitial Gallon per Mile for Light Duty Vehicles (LDVs) 2.86E-02Initial Gallon per Mile for Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDVs) 0.139832GWP InputsGeographic Location Proxy for Vancouver: SeattleCurrent Albedo 0.12Embodied Impacts Input File Name Input_Processes.xlsEmbodied Impacts Input File PathC:\Users\Hamed\Downloads\Pave-Save\Input_Processes.xlsCost InputsDiscount Rate 1.70%Use Price Index TRUECosts for Best DesignsPAVEMENT LCA SUMMARY1.21, 1.26, 1.31, 1.36, 1.46, 1.56, 1.76, 1.96, 2.16, 2.36, 2.56, 2.76, 2.96, 3.16, 3.36, 3.56, 3.76, 3.96Avg Des. 1 % Des. 1 Avg Des. 2 % Des. 2 Avg Des. 3 % Des. 3 Avg Des. 1 % Des. 1 Avg Des. 2 % Des. 2 Avg Des. 3 % Des. 3Embodied GWP 1003684.55 60.67 984241.199 62.28 949276.775 63.1 Embodied GWP 367010.633 31.39 304571.828 28.79 268884.077 27.41Albedo GWP -77846.5314 -4.71 -77846.5314 -4.93 -77846.5314 -5.17 Albedo GWP -77846.5314 -6.66 -77846.5314 -7.36 -77846.5314 -7.93Lighting_GWP 108360.135 6.55 108360.135 6.86 108360.135 7.2 Lighting_GWP 108360.135 9.27 108360.135 10.24 108360.135 11.04Roughness GWP 229879.012 13.89 218488.929 13.83 211896.878 14.09 Roughness GWP 389468.789 33.31 380172.191 35.94 373019.6 38.02Deflection GWP 379797.173 22.96 336459.311 21.29 302059.197 20.08 Deflection GWP 375492.06 32.11 336079.127 31.77 302276.719 30.81Congestion GWP 6014.15147 0.36 5906.7863 0.37 5714.21572 0.38 Congestion GWP 2242.74672 0.19 1751.9043 0.17 1465.80063 0.15EOL GWP 4566.98779 0.28 4745.90994 0.3 4923.04286 0.33 EOL GWP 4566.98779 0.39 4745.90994 0.45 4923.04286 0.5Total GWP 1654455.48 100 1580355.74 100 1504383.71 100 Total GWP 1169294.82 100 1057834.56 100 ########## 100Construction Cost 186240.54 12.71 196731.666 13.83 206959.144 15.22 Construction Cost 186240.54 32.59 196731.666 39.35 206,959.14 46.13Maintenance Cost 1285330.63 87.73 1233660.25 86.72 1160578.6 85.37 Maintenance Cost 394834.414 69.09 308917.049 61.79 249908.311 55.7Salvage Value -6550.58594 -0.45 -7893.96664 -0.55 -8058.72281 -0.59 Salvage Value -9610.83583 -1.68 -5670.74949 -1.13 -8206.09651 -1.83Total Cost 1465020.59 100 1422497.95 100 1359479.02 100 Total Cost 571464.118 100 499977.965 100 ########## 100Avg Des. 1 % Des. 1 Avg Des. 2 % Des. 2 Avg Des. 3 % Des. 3 Avg Des. 1 % Des. 1 Avg Des. 2 % Des. 2 Avg Des. 3 % Des. 3Embodied GWP 388010.432 33.04 336974.413 31.36 283543.701 28.82 Embodied GWP 337604.539 29.25 296739.168 27.78 257565.265 26.05Albedo GWP -77846.5314 -6.63 -77846.5314 -7.25 -77846.5314 -7.91 Albedo GWP -77846.5314 -6.75 -77846.5314 -7.29 -77846.5314 -7.87Lighting_GWP 108360.135 9.23 108360.135 10.09 108360.135 11.01 Lighting_GWP 108360.135 9.39 108360.135 10.14 108360.135 10.96Roughness GWP 371511.834 31.64 365489.659 34.02 360343.731 36.63 Roughness GWP 403537.544 34.97 398919.539 37.34 392623.775 39.71Deflection GWP 377376.855 32.14 334737.093 31.15 302906.577 30.79 Deflection GWP 375794.993 32.56 335682.071 31.42 301663.002 30.51Congestion GWP 2366.70028 0.2 2005.02635 0.19 1573.36481 0.16 Congestion GWP 1995.50483 0.17 1749.04436 0.16 1428.70209 0.14EOL GWP 4566.98779 0.39 4745.90994 0.44 4923.04286 0.5 EOL GWP 4566.98779 0.4 4745.90994 0.44 4923.04286 0.5Total GWP 1174346.41 100 1074465.7 100 983,804.02 100 Total GWP 1154013.17 100 1068349.34 100 988,717.39 100Construction Cost 186240.54 30.84 196731.666 37.25 206959.144 43.88 Construction Cost 186240.54 34.4 196731.666 41.12 206959.144 48.09Maintenance Cost 424060.681 70.23 341948.229 64.75 271203.329 57.5 Maintenance Cost 361182.536 66.72 292483.606 61.13 233563.751 54.27Salvage Value -6471.87683 -1.07 -10584.4067 -2 -6541.79679 -1.39 Salvage Value -6093.46985 -1.13 -10734.6028 -2.24 -10171.2027 -2.36Total Cost 603829.344 100 528095.488 100 471620.676 100 Total Cost 541329.606 100 478480.669 100 430351.692 100Avg Des. 1 % Des. 1 Avg Des. 2 % Des. 2 Avg Des. 3 % Des. 3 Avg Des. 1 % Des. 1 Avg Des. 2 % Des. 2 Avg Des. 3 % Des. 3Embodied GWP 293428.719 25.31 255504.224 23.8 225155.149 22.44 Embodied GWP 331550.775 28.46 268015.726 25.42 232180.467 23.79Albedo GWP -77846.5314 -6.71 -77846.5314 -7.25 -77846.5314 -7.76 Albedo GWP -77846.5314 -6.68 -77846.5314 -7.38 -77846.5314 -7.97Lighting_GWP 108360.135 9.35 108360.135 10.1 108360.135 10.8 Lighting_GWP 108360.135 9.3 108360.135 10.28 108360.135 11.1Roughness GWP 452469.376 39.03 446647.355 41.61 439460.232 43.79 Roughness GWP 421451.086 36.17 413477.779 39.21 405102.255 41.5Deflection GWP 376596.127 32.48 334441.188 31.16 302285.732 30.12 Deflection GWP 375027.588 32.19 336139.082 31.88 302240.449 30.96Congestion GWP 1746.64221 0.15 1472.21309 0.14 1221.99972 0.12 Congestion GWP 2021.20548 0.17 1500.79504 0.14 1192.42159 0.12EOL GWP 4566.98779 0.39 4745.90994 0.44 4923.04286 0.49 EOL GWP 4566.98779 0.39 4745.90994 0.45 4923.04286 0.5Total GWP 1159321.46 100 1073324.49 100 1003559.76 100 Total GWP 1165131.24 100 1054392.9 100 976152.24 100Construction Cost 186240.54 38.85 196731.666 46.2 206959.144 53.77 Construction Cost 186240.54 35.8 196731.666 43.33 206959.144 50.79Maintenance Cost 301780.223 62.96 240533.383 56.49 189907.081 49.34 Maintenance Cost 345202.354 66.35 261914.445 57.69 205201.749 50.36Salvage Value -8682.73124 -1.81 -11466.9806 -2.69 -11943.1479 -3.1 Salvage Value -11172.0846 -2.15 -4655.43857 -1.03 -4696.46884 -1.15Total Cost 479338.032 100 425798.069 100 384923.077 100 Total Cost 520270.809 100 453990.672 100 407464.424 100IRI 2.96 IRI 3.36IRI 3.96 IRI 3.56Sample Global Warming Potential (kg CO2 e ) & Costs for Select IRI Trigger ValuesPoor Maintenance Triggers (1.21,2.96,3.96) Optimal Maintenance Range (3.16-3.56)Only some values shown as sample. Charts display all analysis trigger valuesIRI 1.21 IRI 3.16
Report
eng
Unreviewed
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Undergraduate
UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report
University of British Columbia. CIVL 446
Climate
Community
Transportation
East Mall Redesign - Final Detailed Design Report
Text