"233aa694-b011-4c2d-bd39-45092bdefb31"@en . "CONTENTdm"@en . "PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67"@en . "http://resolve.library.ubc.ca/cgi-bin/catsearch?bid=1198198"@en . "Sessional Papers of the Province of British Columbia"@en . "British Columbia. Legislative Assembly"@en . "2018-03-16"@en . "[1967]"@en . "https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/bcsessional/items/1.0364474/source.json"@en . "application/pdf"@en . " PUBLIC SCHOOLS\nOF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA\nNinety-sixth Annual Report\n1966/67\nBy the Superintendent of Education\nPrinted by A. Sutton, Printer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty\nin right of the Province of British Columbia.\n1968\n The Honourable Leslie Raymond Peterson, Q.C., LL.B., LL.D., Ed.D., F.R.S.A..\nMinister of Education.\n G. Neil Perry, B.A., M.P.A., M.A., Ph.D., LL.D.,\nDeputy Minister of Education.\nF. P. Levirs, M.A., M.S.(Ed.),\nSuperintendent of Education.\n To Major-General the Honourable George Randolph Pearkes,\nV.C., P.C., C.B., D.S.O., M.C,\nLieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia.\nMay it please Your Honour:\nI beg respectfully to present the Ninety-sixth Annual Report of the Public\nSchools of the Province.\nLESLIE RAYMOND PETERSON,\nMinister of Education.\nJanuary, 1968.\n DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 1967\nMinister of Education:\nThe Honourable Leslie Raymond Peterson, Q.C., LL.B., LL.D., Ed.D., F.R.S.A.\nDeputy Minister of Education:\nG. Neil Perry, B.A., M.P.A., M.A., Ph.D., LL.D.\nSuperintendent of Education:\nF. P. Levirs, M.A., M.S.(Ed.)\nAssistant Superintendent (Administration):\nJ. Phillipson, B.A., B.Ed.\nAssistant Superintendent (Instruction):\nJ. R. Meredith, B.A., M.Ed.\nChief Inspector of Schools:\nW. D. Reid, B.A., M.Ed.\nDistrict Superintendents, Superintendents, and Inspectors of Schools:\nH. D. Abbott, B.A., M.A., Nanaimo.\nK. F. Alexander, B.Sc, B.Ed., Mission City.\nN. A. Allen, B.A., Kamloops.\nJ. E. Beech, B.A., B.Ed., Assistant Superintendent, Surrey.\nG. C. Bissell, B.A., B.Ed., Castlegar.\nR. S. Boyle, B.A., B.Ed., Fort St. John.\nC. A. Bruce, B.A., B.Ed., Revelstoke.\nD. H. Campbell, B.A., B.Ed., Squamish.\nJ. L. Canty, B.A., M.Ed., Dawson Creek.\nD. G. Chamberlain, B.A., B.Ed., Hope.\nJ. Chell, M.A., Victoria.\nR. B. Cox, B.A., Prince Rupert.\nC. Cuthbert, B.SAcc, B.Ed., Oliver.\nJ. M. Evans, B.A., M.Ed., Vanderhoof.\nD. L. Feir, B.A., M.A., Quesnel.\nH. C. Ferguson, B.A., West Vancouver.\nR. C. Flower, B.A., B.Ed., Williams Lake.\nW. B. Fromson, B.A., B.Ed., Assistant Superintendent, North Vancouver.\nG. W. Graham, B.A., Richmond.\nS. J. Graham, B.A., New Westminster.\nJ. V. Grant, B.A., B.Ed., Assistant Superintendent, Vancouver.\nP. C. Grant, B.A., B.Ed., Qualicum Beach.\nW. H. Gurney, M.A., Port Alberni.\nR. R. Hanna, B.A., B.Ed., Merritt.\nE. E. Hyndman, B.A., B.Paed., Victoria.\nE. J. Irwin, B.A., B.Ed., Inspector, Vancouver.\nF. L. Irwin, B.A., Vernon.\n1. H. R. Jeffery, B.A., Haney.\nG. E. Johnson, B.A., B.Ed., M.Ed., Powell\nRiver.\nA. D. Jones, B.A., Duncan.\nE. E. Lewis, B.A., B.Paed., Kimberley.\nW. J. Logie, B.A., Campbell River.\nA. J. Longmore, B.A., B.Ed., Assistant Superintendent, Victoria.\nR. F. Lucas, B.A., B.Ed., M.Ed., Courtenay.\nW. E. Lucas, B.A., B.Paed., North Vancouver.\nD. E. McFee, B.A., M.A., Kitimat.\nC. S. McKenzie, B.A., Trail.\nD. H. MacKirdy, D.F.C., B.A., B.Ed., M.Ed.,\nTerrace.\nF. A. McLellan, M.A., B.Paed., Sidney.\nJ. I. Macdougall, B.A., M.A., M.Ed.,\nD.Paed., Chilliwack.\nD. B. Mackenzie, M.A., Assistant Superintendent, Vancouver.\nW. A. Marchbank, A.B., B.Ed., Nelson.\nE. Marriott, B.A., Cloverdale.\nF. T. Middleton, B.A., B.Ed., Kamloops.\nW. J. Mouat, B.A., M.Ed., Abbotsford.\nG. H. Nelson, B.A., B.Ed., Salmon Arm.\nF. J. Orme, B.A., B.Peed., Kelowna.\nG. M. Paton, B.A., B.Ed., M.Ed., Penticton.\nR. S. Price, B.A., B.Com., Ladysmith.\nD. L. Pritchard, M.A., Inspector, Vancouver.\nP. B. Pullinger, B.A., B.Ed., Cranbrook.\nC. T. Rendle, B.A., Assistant Superintendent, Burnaby.\nC. E. Ritchie, B.A., Courtenay.\nR. F. Sharp, B.A., D.Paed., Vancouver.\nH. D. Stafford, B.A., M.Ed., Murrayville.\nR. B. Stibbs, B.A., New Westminster.\nC. I. Taylor, B.A., B.Ed., Burnaby.\nR. F. Thorstenson, B.A., Ladner.\nD. P. Todd, B.A., B.Ed., Prince George.\nF. M. Wallace, M.A., Inspector, Vancouver.\nD. N. Weicker, B.A., B.Ed., Fort St. John.\nC. C. Wright, B.A., Creston.\nW. J. Zoellner, B.A., B.Ed., Victoria.\n F 10 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nSPECIAL OFFICIALS\nCo-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment: P. J. Kitley, MA.\nComptroller of Expenditures: S. E. Espley.\nSupervisor of School Construction: H. Dickinson.\nDirector of Technical and Vocational Education: J. S. White.\nAssistant Director of Technical and Vocational Education: V. E. Rickard, B.Ed.\nInspectors of Technical Classes: C. J. Strong, M.A., and R. Smith.\nInspector of Technical and Vocational Education: P. C. MacGregor.\nRegistrar: H. M. Evans, B.A.\nDirector of Home Economics: Miss M. C. Orr, B.A., B.S.\nInspectors of Home Economics:\nMiss J. R. Irvine, B.Sc.(H.Ec), and Miss J. Campbell, M.A., B.Sc.(H.Ec), Dip.Ed.\nDirector of Community Programmes: J. H. Panton, B.A., M.Sc.\nDirector of Visual Education: J. R. Pollock, B.A.Sc.\nActing Director of School Broadcasts: B. A. Black.\nDirector of Tests and Standards: C. B. Conway, B.Sc, M.S., D.Paed.\nDirector of Secondary School Correspondence: J. R. Hind, B.A., B.Paed.\nDirector of Elementary School Correspondence: A. H. Plows, B.Ed.\nDirector of Textook Branch: D. W. C. Huggins.\nSuperintendent, Jericho Hill School (for the Deaf and the Blind):\nC. E. MacDonald, LL.B., B.S. in Ed., LL.D., Litt.D.\n TABLE OF CONTENTS\nReport of the Superintendent of Education-\nCentenary in the Schools\t\nPage\n13\n41\nReport of the Assistant Superintendent (Administration and School Board\nRelations) 42\nReport of the Assistant Superintendent (Instructional Services)\n46\nReport of the Acting Assistant Superintendent (University and College Affairs) 56\nReport of the Director of the Division of Tests and Standards\nReport of the Director of Home Economics\t\nReports of the Directors of Correspondence Schools-\nSecondary and Vocational Courses\t\nElementary Correspondence School\t\nReport of the Director of the Division of School Broadcasts\nReport of the Director of Visual Education\t\nReport of the Director of the Textbook Branch.\nReport of the Chief Inspector of Schools\t\nReport of the Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment-\nReport of the Director of Technical and Vocational Education.\nReport of the Director of Community Programmes Branch\t\n58\n60\n63\n69\n70\n72\n75\n77\n81\n84\n99\nReport of the Superintendent, Jericho Hill School (Deaf and Blind School) 109\nReport of the Registrar of Teachers and Examinations 112\nReport of the Commission on Education of Soldiers' Dependent Children Act 123\nStatistical Returns 125\n11\n F 12 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nSTATISTICAL RETURNS\nPage\nNumber of Pupils and Mean Daily Attendance by Type of School 13\nDistribution of Pupils by Grade and Sex 14\nDistribution of Instructional Staff and Pupils by Type of School 15\nTeachers' Certificates\u00E2\u0080\u0094Various Tables 15\nComparison of Enrolment and Expenditure for Public Education 17\nNumber of School Districts 18\nNumber of Senior Secondary Schools, Divisions, Teachers, and Pupils in Each\nDistrict 18\nNumber of Secondary Schools, Divisions, Teachers, and Pupils in Each District 19\nNumber of Junior Secondary Schools, Divisions, Teachers, and Pupils in Each\nDistrict 20\nNumber of Elementary-Senior Secondary Schools, Divisions, Teachers, and\nPupils in Each District 21\nNumber of Elementary-Junior Secondary Schools, Divisions, Teachers, and\nPupils in Each District 22\nNumber of Elementary Schools, Divisions, Teachers, and Pupils in Each\nDistrict 23\nDistrict-employed Instructional Staff 24\nSummary of All Schools Showing Number of Divisions, Teachers, and Pupils 25\nTeachers' Salaries by Type of School 26\nClassification of Teachers' Salaries, Teachers and Principals Enrolling Divisions, Supervising Principals, Special Staff and Instructors 28\nExpenditure for Education for the Calendar Year 1966 30\nCosts per Pupil, Various Bases, Calendar Year 1966 30\nExpenditure by School Districts for the Calendar Year 1966 31\nRevenue for Education for the Calendar Year 1966 by School District 34\nSummary of Enrolment by Schools in the Various School Districts 126\nRecapitulation of Enrolment by Sex and Grades 182\n Report of the Superintendent of Education, 1966/67\nEducation Office,\nVictoria, B.C., January, 1968.\nTo the Honourable Leslie Raymond Peterson,\nMinister of Education.\nSir,\u00E2\u0080\u0094I beg to submit herewith the Ninety-sixth Annual Report of the Public\nSchools of British Columbia for the school-year ended June 30, 1967.\nENROLMENT AND AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE\nEnrolment in the schools of the Province rose from 420,790 in June, 1966, to\n445,228 in June, 1967. The increase of 24,438 is the largest on record and represents 5.8 per cent of the previous year's total. Average daily attendance rose from\n379,045 to 408,452, and the percentage of regular attendance rose from 90.1 to\n91.7.\nNumber\nof Schools\nEnrolment of Pupils\nAttendance of Pupils\nType of School\nBoys\nGirls\nTotal\nPer Cent\nof Total\nMean Daily\nAttendance\nPer Cent\nof Enrolment\n18\n105\n71\n24\n47\n1,164\n6,525\n40,018\n22,789\n6,660\n8,383\n145,360\n6,019\n37,996\n21,003\n6,144\n7,533\n136,798\n12,544 | 2.82\n78,014 : 17.52\n43.792 ! 9.84\n10,704.4\n69,525.8\n39.743.9\n85.3\nSecondary\u00E2\u0080\u0094 _\t\n89.1\n90.8\nElementary-senior\nsecondary \t\nElementary-junior\nsecondary\t\nElementary\u00E2\u0080\u0094 \t\n1\n12,804 ' 2.88 11,587.1\n15,916 3.57 j 14,543.4\n282,158 ; 63.37 | 262,347.1\n90.5\n91.4\n93.0\nTotals\t\n1,429\n229,735\n215,493\n445.228 1 100.00 1 408.451.fi\n91.7\nIn addition to the number given above, there were enrolled:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nIn the Secondary School Correspondence classes, regular students (exclusive of the 5,383 officially registered in other\nschools) 2,234\nIn the Elementary School Correspondence classes, regular students 874\nUnder section 20 of the Public Schools Act, pupils receiving instruction 72\n3,180\nAdult education\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nCanadian Vocational Training Programme\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nDay 17,333\nNight 13,316\nPublic-school adult education 112,10s1\nSecondary School Correspondence (adults only) 9,296\nElementary School Correspondence (adults only) 118\ni Includes 83,549 non-vocational.\n13\n F 14\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nAdult education\u00E2\u0080\u0094Continued\nBritish Columbia Institute of Technology\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nDay\nNight\nVocational teachers-in-training (summer session)\nUniversity of Victoria non-credit courses\nUniversity of British Columbia non-credit courses\n1,356\n1,700\n110\n1,0462\n7,4913\n167,051\n2 This figure does not include the following enrolments: 1,111 summer session (credit and non-credit), 480\nextra-sessional (evening division).\n3 This figure does not include the following enrolments: 7,325 summer session (credit and non-credit), 1,608\nextra-sessional (evening division), 1,016 correspondence courses.\nDISTRIBUTION OF PUPILS BY GRADE AND SEX\nThe following table shows the number of boys and girls enrolled in each grade\nfor the school-year 1966/67: \u00E2\u0080\u0094\nGrade\nBoys\nGirls\nTotal\nSecondary\nGrade XIII \t\n1,437\n862\n2,299\nGrade XII\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n7,120\n3,137\n6,531\n3,595\n13,651\n6,732\nTotals _ \t\n10,257\n10,126\n20,383\nGrade XI\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n8,504\n4,751\n7,637\n4,943\n16,141\n9,694\nTotals \t\n13,255\n12,580\n25,835\n14,920\n16,569\n17,879\n14,166\n15,858\n16,770\n29,086\nGrade IX\nGrade VIII .- -\t\n34,649\n748\n1,063\n1,401\n522\n734\n863\n1,270\n1,797\n2,264\nOccupational 1 \t\n3,212\n2,119\n5,331\n77,529\n72,481\n150,010\nElementary\nIntermediate-\n2,673\n18,239\n18,384\n18,906\n19,352\n1,599\n17,496\n17,906\n18,331\n18,809\n4,272\nGrade VII \t\n35,735\nfirade VT\n36,290\nGrade V \t\n37,237\nGrade IV\t\n38,161\n77,554\n74,141\n151,695\nPrimary\u00E2\u0080\u0094\u00E2\u0080\u00A2\n2,234\n20,384\n21,521\n23,016\n7,497\n1,246\n19,577\n19,994\n20,880\n7,174\n3,480\nGrade tit\n39,961\n..rflrio ti\n41,515\nrjrprln T\n43,896\n14,671\n74,652\n68,871\n143,523\n152,206\n143,012\n295,218\nTotal boys, 229,735; total girls, 215,493; grand total, 445,228.\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nF 15\nDISTRIBUTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF AND PUPILS\nBY TYPE OF SCHOOL\nThe number of teachers employed in the different classes of schools, the number\nof pupils in each class of school, and also the average number of pupils per teacher\nare shown in the following table:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\nSuper-\nInstructional Staff\nTotal\nAverage Number of Pupils\nper Staff Member\nType of School\nof\nPrincipals\nSchool\nSchools\nEnrolling\nDivisions\nSpecial\nStaff\nTotal\nInstructors\nStaff\nEnrolling a\nDivision\nInstructing\nOn Total\nStaff\nSenior secondary-\n18\n17\n410\n192\n602\n619\n30.60\n20.84\n20.26\nSecondary\n105\n104\n2,592\n1,029\n3,621\n3,725\n30.10\n21.54\n20.94\nJunior secondary...\n71\n69\n1,438\n493\n1,931\n2,000\n30.45\n22.68\n21.90\nElementary-senior\nsecondary \t\n24\n22\n455\n134\n589\n611\n28.14\n21.74\n20.96\nElementary-junior\nsecondary\t\n47\n31\n561\n102\n663\n694\n28.37\n24.01\n22.93\nElementary\t\n1,164\n290\n8,807\n626\n9,433\n9,723\n32.04\n29.91\n29.02\nDistrict-employed\nteachers\t\n\t\n85\n85\n85\n\t\n\t\n\t\nTotals\t\n1,429\n533\n14,263\n2,661\n16,924\n17,457\n31.22\n26.31\n25.50\nDistrict-employed supervisory staff: Full time, 275; part time, 9.5; total (persons), 285.\nTEACHERS' CERTIFICATES\nThe following table shows number and percentage of teachers in elementary\nand secondary schools during the school-year 1966/67 by certificate level:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nCertificate Level\nTotal\nType of School\nVI,\nV-A,\nVB\nCertifi\nP-A\n(S-A)\nPB\n(S-B)\nPC\n(S-C)\nST\nE_A\nE-B\nE-C\nET\nVC\ncates\nSenior secondary-\nNumber \t\n175\n360\n32\n9\n17\n15\n1\n9\n1\n619\nPer cent\t\n28.3\n58.2\n5.2\n1.5\n2.7\n2.4\n0.2\n1.5\n0.2\nSecondary\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber... \t\n956\n1,983\n294\n53\n186\n170\n12\n61\n\t\n9\n3,724\nPer cent \t\n25.7\n53.2\n7.9\n1.4\n5.0\n4.6\n0.3\n1.6\n\t\n0.2\nJunior secondary\u00E2\u0080\u0094\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\nNumber\t\n254\n1,006\n266\n32\n219\n182\n7\n27\n5\n1,998\n12.7\n50.4\n13.3\n1.6\n11.0\n9.1\n0.4\n1.4\n0.3\nElementary-senior\nsecondary-\nNumber \t\n131\n265\n53\n15\n43\n75\n11\n15\n1\n1\n610\n21.5\n43.4\n8.7\n2.5\n7.0\n12.3\n1.8\n2.5\n0.2\n0.2\nElementary-junior\nsecondary\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber. \t\n50\n213\n77\n13\n118\n179\n19\n25\n694\n7.2\n30.7\n11.1\n1.9\n17.0\n25.8\n2.7\n3.6\nElementary\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n279\n1,034\n1,475\n23\n2,608\n3,846\n319\n123\n9,707\n2.9\n10.7\n15.2\n0.2\n26.9\n39.6\n3.3\n1.3\nDistrict-employed\ninstructors-\nNumber..\t\n7\n15\n11\n4\n21\n20\n3\n4\n85\nPercent \t\n8.2\n17.6\n12.9\n4.7\n24.7\n23.5\n3.5\n4.7\nTotal instructional\nstaffi\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber..\t\n1,852\n4,876\n2,208\n149\n3,212\n4,487\n372\n264\n2\n15\n17,437\nPer cent\t\n10.6\n28.0\n12.7\n0.9\n18.4\n25.7\n2.1\n1.5\n0.0\n0.1\nDistrict supervisory\nstaff-\nNumber\t\n127\n78\n36\n2\n33\n5\n2\n2\n285\n44.6\n27.4\n12.6\n0.7\n11.6\n1.8\n0.7\n\t\n0.7\n..\ni Not including 20 exchange teachers who do not hold British Columbia certificates.\n F 16 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nTeachers With and Without University Degrees\nHighest Degree\nNo Degree\nTotal Teachers\nType of School\nBachelors\nMasters or\nDoctorates\nPer Cent\nof All\nTeachers\nNumber\nPer Cent\nof All\nTeachers\nNumber\nPer Cent\nof AU\nTeachers\n461\n2,544\n1,224\n354\n292\n2,334\n31\n58\n404\n128\n56\n24\n132\n3\n3.0\n16.9\n7.7\n2.3\n1.8\n14.1\n0.2\n100\n777\n648\n201\n378\n7,257\n51\n0.6\n4.5\n3.7\n1.2\n2.2\n41.6\n0.3\n619\n3,725\n2,000\n611\n694\n9,723\n85\n3.5\nSecondary - ._\t\nJunior secondary .. \t\nElementary-senior secondary\nElementary-junior secondary.\nElementary \t\nDistrict-employed ins true-\n21.3\n11.5\n3.5\n4.0\n55.7\n0.5\nTotal instructional staff. \t\n7.240\n805\n46.1\n9,412\n53.9\n17,457\n100.0\nDistrict supervisory staff\n167\n67\n(82.1)\n51\n(17.9)\n285\n(100.0)\nHighest Degree by Faculty and Level (Teachers, Principals,\nand Supervisory Staff)\n(Administrative staff is excluded.)\nBachelors\nMasters\nDoctorates\nTotal\n3,462\n2,640\n645\n181\n176\n114\n95\n40\n14\n11\n1\n28\n416\n337\n68\n9\n3\n5\n3\n3\n1\n4\n8\n1\n12\n2\n3,886\nArts\n2,977\n713\n190\n176\n114\n98\n46\n17\nSocial Work_ . . . . _ .\n14\n14\nOther fields _ \t\n34\nTotals \t\n7,407\n849\n23\n8,279\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nF 17\nCOMPARISON OF ENROLMENT AND EXPENDITURE\nFOR PUBLIC EDUCATION\nThe enrolment in the schools of the Province for the various years since\n1877/78 and also the cost of maintaining them are shown in the following exhibit:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nSchool-year\nNumber\nof\nTeachers\nEmployed\nNumber\nof\nSchool\nDistricts\nAggregate\nEnrolment\nAverage\nDaily\nAttendance\nPercentage of\nAttendance\nGovernment\nExpenditure\nfor\nEducation\nTotal\nExpenditure\nfor Public\nSchools\n1877/78...\n1882/83-\n1887/88...\n1892/93...\n1897/98...\n1902/03...\n1907/08...\n1912/13...\n1913/14...\n1917/18...\n1922/23...\n1927/28...\n1928/29...\n1929/30...\n1930/31...\n1931/32...\n1932/33...\n1933/34...\n1934/35...\n1935/36.\n1936/37..\n1937/38...\n1938/39...\n1939/40...\n1940/41...\n1941/42...\n1942/43...\n1943/44...\n1944/45...\n1945/46..\n1946/47...\n1947/48...\n1948/49...\n1949/50...\n1950/51...\n1951/52...\n1952/53..\n1953/54...\n1954/55...\n1955/56..\n1956/57...\n1957/58...\n1958/59...\n1959/60..\n1960/61...\n1961/62.\n1962/63..\n1963/64..\n1964/65...\n1965/66..\n1966/67\n56\n69\n128\n267\n429\n607\n816\n1,597\n1,859\n2,246\n3,118\n3,668\n3,784\n3,854\n3,948\n3,959\n3,912\n3,873\n3,942\n3,956\n4,025\n4,092\n4,194\n4,220\n4,248\n4,224\n4,055\n4,162\n4,354\n4,512\n4,833\n5,116\n5,496\n5,873\n6,272\n6,598\n7,105\n7,574\n8,185\n8,690\n9,474\n10,171\n10,839\n11,513\n12,137\n12,772\n13,571\n14,415\n15,327\n16,173\n17,457\n45\n59\n104\n169\n213\n268\n189\n359\n374\n575\n744\n788\n792\n803\n811\n830\n821\n827\n762\n773\n763\n741\n721\n720\n730\n696\n661\n654\n650\n86\n89\n93\n97\n97\n98\n101\n100\n104\n104\n102\n103\n102\n101\n98\n97\n99\n100\n100\n93\n93\n87\n2,198\n2,693\n6,372\n11,496\n17,648\n24,499\n33,314\n57,608\n62,263\n67,516\n94,888\n108,179\n109,588\n111,017\n113,914\n115,919\n116,816\n115,792\n117,233\n116,722\n118,431\n120,360\n120,934\n120,459\n119,634\n118,405\n115,447\n119,043\n125,135\n130,605\n137,827\n146,708\n155,515\n164,212\n173,354\n183,112\n195,290\n210,174\n223,840\n240,674\n260,069\n277,070\n291,223\n305,837\n321,760\n340,290\n358,905\n378,641\n400,064\n420,790\n445,228\n1,395\n1,383\n3,093\n7,111\n11,055\n16,357\n23,195\n43,274\n49,377\n54,746\n77,752\n91,760\n94,410\n96,196\n99,375\n103,510\n104,978\n103,389\n101,893\n101,873\n104,044\n106,515\n107,660\n108,826\n103,192\n102,085\n93,473\n102,999\n107,599\n114,590\n121,334\n129,859\n138,941\n147,583\n154,077\n163,364\n176,138\n191,061\n204,239\n218,303\n235,396\n252,490\n267,052\n281,513\n298,175\n312,173\n332,585\n348,472\n367,718\n379,045\n408,452\n63.49\n51.36\n48.54\n61.85\n62.64\n66.76\n69.62\n75.12\n79.30\n81.09\n81.94\n84.82\n86.17\n86.65\n87.23\n89.29\n89.86\n89.30\n86.91\n87.27\n87.85\n88.49\n89.02\n90.34\n86.26\n86.22\n80.96\n86.52\n85.99\n87.74\n88.03\n88.51\n89.34\n89.87\n88.88\n89.21\n90.19\n90.91\n91.24\n90.70\n90.51\n91.13\n91.70\n92.05\n92.67\n91.74\n92.67\n92.03\n91.91\n90.08\n91.70\n60,\n113,\n174.\n290.\n473,\n544,\n1,663,\n1,885,\n1,653,\n3,176.\n3,532.\n3,765,\n3,743.\n3,834,\n4,015,\n2,849,\n2,611,\n2,835.\n2,972.\n3,277.\n3,524.\n3,630,\n3,585,\n3,963,\n4,028,\n3,924,\n4,244,\n5,022,\n5,765,\n9,398,\n12,468,\n17,363,\n22,809,\n25,830,\n26,885,\n26,555,\n24,060,\n34,279.\n41,067.\n43,989.\n50,861.\n53,288.\n59,472.\n70,174.\n77,632.\n83,782.\n95,497.\n105,017.\n119,871.\n144,702\n411.141\n758.751\n679.361\n775.43\n255.26\n802.29\n671.60\n003.34\n654.11\n796.60\n686.283\n518.953\n920.693\n317.083\n727.193\n074.373\n972.023\n937.803\n040.743\n.385.043\n660.233\n962.693\n.670.783\n769.003\n848.243\n.397.883\n243.533\n898.823|\n534.593]\n205.503;\n,473.463\n,653.183\n,430.943\n,631.233\n076.883J\n,980.433|\n,080.243\n,233.153\n,302.273\n,740.343\n,524.323\n.473.633\n028.943\n055.063\n,999.843\n903.483\n121.793].\n,375.163tj\n.594.753)\n,278.313]\n,607.4031'\n$215\n425.\n604.\n1,220,\n4,658,\n4,634.\n3,519.\n7,630.\n9,261\n11,149\n10,008\n10,061\n9,719\n8,941.\n8,213,\n8,458,\n8,775.\n9,593.\n10,193\n10,640,\n10,521.\n10,982.\n11,120\n11,502.\n12,231\n13,683.\n14,818\n20,176,\n25,768\n35,538\n47,726,\n54,195\n57,881\n58,401\n70,791\n80,823,\n69,314,\n77,653\n90.483\n101.351\n115,941\n133,401\n145,535\n157,614.\n177,539.\n199,114\n227,937\n269,217\n,056.222\n,555.10\n,357.86\n,509.85\n,894.97\n,877.56\n,014.61\n,009.543\n,094.983\n,996.273\n,255.663\n,387.993\n,333.813\n,497.343\n,369.043\n,156.003\n,353.783\n562.643\n,367.083\n,740.473\n,684.923\n364.493\n,801.943\n,291.353\n,029.353\n,538.183\n,625.813\n,930.533\n,392.093\n,079.883\n,750.373\n,133.953\n,559.483\n,121.153\n,844.253\n,263.713\n,181.244\n192.32*\n,765.63*\n,107.944\n,018.064\n,622.844\n1,715.484\n,783.794\n,584.164\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2,313.754\n',392.314\n,969.404\ni The total expenditure for public schools borne by the Government.\n2 This amount does not include the expenditure (not available) made for incidental expenses in city school\ndistricts.\n3 This amount includes the annual grant from the Government to the Provincial universities.\n4 This amount is exclusive of capital expenditures from by-law funds.\n F 18\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nNUMBER OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS\nThe following table shows the number of classes of school districts in which\nexpenditure for school purposes was made during the school-year 1966/67:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nMunicipal school districts 75\nRural school districts 12\nTotal\n87\nSENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS\nThe enrolment in schools enrolling pupils in Grades XI to XIII during the\nschool-year 1966/67 was 12,544. Of these, 6,525 were boys and 6,019 were girls.\nThe number of schools, number of divisions, and number of pupils are given in the\nfollowing table. The total school staff of 619 principals and teachers is reduced by\npart-time assignment in these schools to 616.4.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n20. Salmon Arm..\n22. Vernon\t\n34. Abbotsford\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n36. Surrey\t\n38. Richmond\t\n41. Burnaby\t\n43. Coquitlam-\n52. Prince RuperL\n57. Prince George..\n59. Peace River South-\n62. Sooke\t\n63. Saanich\t\n71. Courtenay\t\n72. CampbeU River-\nTotals\t\n18\n1\n26\n48\n48\n120\n33\n10\n26\n17\n10\n19\n22\n12\n18\n410\n28\n4.7\n35.9\n72.7\n69.4\n169\n55.2\n16.5\n47\n25\n14\n25\n34\n20\n616.4\n541\n115\n746\n1,467\n1,392\n3,694\n1,146\n322\n879\n475\n253\n564\n674\n276\n12,544\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nSECONDARY SCHOOLS\nF 19\nSix more schools enrolled pupils from Grades VIII to XII or XIII in 1966/67,\nand the total enrolment increased 4,698 to 78,014. Of these, 40,018 were boys and\n37,996 were girls. In the following table the total of 3,725 principals and teachers\nhas been reduced by part-time teaching to 3,707.0.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumbe:\nSchoo\nof\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n2.\n3.\n4.\n7.\n9.\n10.\n11.\n12.\n14.\n15.\n16.\n18.\n19.\n21.\n22.\n23.\n24.\n25.\n26.\n27.\n28.\n29.\n30.\n31.\n32.\n33.\n35.\n36.\n37.\n39.\n40.\n42.\n43.\n44.\n45.\n46.\n47.\n48.\n53.\n54.\n55.\n56.\n58.\n60.\n61.\n62.\n64.\n65.\n66.\n67.\n68.\n69.\n70.\n72.\n75.\n77.\n79.\n80.\n85.\n86.\nCranbrook..\nKimberley..\nWindermere...\nNelson\t\nCastlegar.\t\nArrow Lakes..\nTrail\t\nGrand Forks\t\nSouthern Okanagan..\nPenticton\t\nKeremeos\t\nGolden\t\nRevelstoke\t\nArmstrong-Spallumcheen..\nVernon \t\nKelowna\t\nKamloops\t\nBarriere\t\nBirch Island\t\nWilliams Lake.\nQuesnel\t\nLillooet\t\nSouth Cariboo..\nMerritt \t\nFraser Canyon-\nChilliwack\t\nLangley\t\nSurrey \t\nDelta\t\nVancouver \t\nNew Westminster-\nMaple Ridge. \t\nCoquitlam-\nNorth Vancouver-\nWest Vancouver\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nSechelt\t\nPowell River-\nHowe Sound-\nTerrace\t\nSmithers\t\nBurns Lake\t\nVanderhoof\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nMcBride\t\nPeace River North .\nGreater Victoria \u00E2\u0080\u0094\nSooke \t\nGulf Islands\t\nCowichan\t\nLake Cowichan..\nLadysmith\t\nNanaimo\t\nQualicum\t\nAlberni \t\nCampbell River-\nMission\t\nSummerland\t\nUcluelet-Tofino..\nKitimat\t\nVancouver Island North.\nCreston-Kaslo\t\n2\n2\n3\n2\n14\n1\n3\n2\n5\n3\n2\n1\n2\n2\nTotals..\n105\n28\n16\n10\n19\n26\n9\n54\n19\n24\n42\n11\n13\n20\n11\n25\n108\n82\n6\n8\n25\n24\n11\n19\n20\n17\n63\n52\n46\n62\n643\n87\n67\n44\n130\n107\n25\n21\n21\n38\n17\n13\n17\n6\n23\n133\n12\n9\n25\n18\n15\n41\n13\n42\n33\n36\n16\n6\n28\n6\n30\n2,592\n41.5\n24\n17.5\n29\n38.4\n11\n81.1\n26\n33.5\n55\n14\n21\n29.7\n17\n40.2\n142.6\n130.4\n10.1\n13.5\n35\n35\n14.9\n28.1\n29\n24\n80.5\n74\n65.6\n89\n911.6\n124\n95\n63\n178.8\n150.8\n36\n31.6\n32\n49.6\n25\n17\n25\n11.3\n32\n189.6\n14\n13\n37.9\n27\n22\n57\n22\n57\n49\n52\n27\n10\n39\n12\n45.2\n3,707.0\n806\n457\n308\n558\n777\n198\n1,622\n497\n694\n1,108\n250\n384\n597\n339\n924\n3,057\n2,680\n165\n188\n757\n767\n228\n460\n619\n431\n1,786\n1,595\n1,292\n1,961\n20,655\n2,691\n2,086\n1,345\n3,784\n3,220\n647\n616\n609\n1,068\n477\n308\n499\n145\n639\n4,198\n264\n226\n748\n491\n383\n1,249\n346\n1,214\n957\n1,171\n513\n157\n764\n149\n890\n78,014\n F 20\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nJUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS\nSchools enrolling pupils in Grades VIII to X increased in number from 56 to\n71 and in enrolment from 36,390 to 43,792, of whom 22,789 were boys and 21,003\nwere girls. In the following table the total staff of 2,000 principals and teachers is\nreduced by part-time assignment in these schools to 1,989.9.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n3. Kimberley \u00E2\u0080\u009E\n9. Castlegar\t\n11. Trail\t\n15. Penticton\t\n20. Salmon Arm..\n22. Vernon\t\n24. Kamloops-\n27. Williams Lake..\n28. Quesnel \t\n33. Chilliwack..\t\n34. Abbotsford\t\n35. Langley\t\n36. Surrey\t\n38. Richmond\t\n41. Burnaby\t\n43. Coquitlam-\n44. North Vancouver\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n47. PoweU River \t\n52. Prince Rupert\t\n57. Prince George\t\n59. Peace River South...\n60. Peace River Nortli-\n61. Greater Victoria.\t\n62. Sooke\t\n63. Saanich\t\n65. Cowichan\t\n68. Nanaimo\t\n69. Qualicum\t\n70. Alberni \t\n71. Courtenay \t\n78. Enderby \t\n20\n9\n21\n26\n22\n39\n27\n17\n13\n42\n45\n11\n175\n99\n141\n81\n53\n25\n25\n56\n35\n18\n199\n17\n37\n41\n61\n6\n32\n38\n7\n27.1\n11.6\n30\n35.8\n30\n52.1\n37.8\n25.5\n18\n58.8\n59.2\n16\n226.5\n133.7\n200.5\n122.4\n77.5\n41.4\n37\n78\n49\n24\n274\n24\n50\n53.1\n81.9\n9\n43.5\n49.5\n13\n552\n236\n606\n778\n627\n1,121\n872\n531\n373\n1,272\n1,359\n324\n5,285\n3,106\n4,245\n2,587\n1,473\n860\n778\n1,754\n1,081\n494\n6,435\n475\n1,082\n1,102\n1,874\n203\n975\n1,133\n199\n43,792\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nELEMENTARY-SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS\nF 21\nAs population has increased, the number of schools enrolling all elementary\nand secondary grades has declined from 44 to 24. The number of teachers in this\ntype of school is shown in the table below as 607.4, having been reduced from 611\nby part-time teaching.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n1\n2 | 37\n1 [ 13\n45\n17\n25.1\n31\n6\n15\n259.2\n43\n10\n40\n2\n13.6\n19.4\n26\n21.9\n3.9\n13.8\n15.5\n881\n250\n3\n21\n25\n5\n12\n475\n17. Princeton\n1S nnlrlpn\n716\n105\n378\n39. Vancouver\n3 177\n1 | 34\n1 | 8\n2 | 32\n1 | 2\n1 12\n1 16\n1 19\n1 I 16\n1 | 3\n1 | 11\n1 | 12\n5,632\n951\n181\n49. Ocean Falls\n823\n50. Queen Charlotte \t\n16\n54. Smithers , \t\n59. Peace River South\n322\n441\n67. T.adysrm'th\n542\n460\n84. Vancouver Island West \t\n60\n286\nUn. University Hill\n285\nTotals \t\n24 1 455\n607.4\n12,804\n F 22 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nELEMENTARY-JUNIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS\nThree more schools enrolled pupils between Grades I and X, but total enrolment declined 1,829 from June, 1966, to June, 1967. The total staff decreased from\n740 to 694, and when part-time teachers are equated, to 681.1.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n1.\n2.\n4.\n7.\n10.\n11.\n13.\n14.\n19.\n20.\n28.\n29.\n32.\n41.\n44.\n50.\n51.\n55.\n56.\n57.\n58.\n62.\n71.\n72.\n81.\n82.\n83.\n84.\n85.\n87.\nUn,\nFernie\t\nCranbrook-\nWindermere.-\nNelson \t\nArrow Lakes._\nTrail\t\nKettle Valley\t\nSouthern Okanagan..\nRevelstoke\t\nSalmon Arm\t\nQuesnel\t\nLillooet\t\nFraser Canyon..\nBurnaby..\nNorth Vancouver-\nQueen Charlotte\t\nPortland Canal\t\nBurns Lake\t\nVanderhoof\t\nPrince George\t\nMcBride\t\nSooke\t\nCourtenay\t\nCampbell River-\nFort Nelson\t\nChilcotin\t\nPortage Mountain-\nVancouver Island West-\nVancouver Island North..\nStikine\t\nBelmont Park.\t\nTotals\t\n7\n12\n10\n22\n3\n25\n17\n22\n6\n6\n6\n10\n8\n86\n27\n27\n6\n8\n21\n63\n10\n6\n20\n10\n7\n1\n25\n10\n52\n6\n22\n16\n11.2\n30.2\n3\n29\n20\n28.5\n6\n6\n7\n11\n9.5\n115\n36\n29.1\n6.3\n8.4\n22.9\n74\n11\n9\n23\n11\n10\n2\n32.2\n13\n60.8\n7\n25\n196\n364\n239\n671\n40\n756\n433\n650\n134\n162\n140\n198\n210\n2,688\n799\n699\n165\n197\n605\n1,676\n285\n178\n547\n233\n195\n39\n809\n221\n1,417\n156\n814\n561\n681.1 | 15,916\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nELEMENTARY SCHOOLS\nF 23\nThe number of schools enrolling pupils in Grade I or Kindergarten to Grade\nVII increased by 50, the staff increased by 860, and the enrolment increased by\n19,445. Grade I reached an all-time high of 43,919, but it should be noticed that\nthe greatest numerical increase was in Grade VIII, and increases in the secondary\ngrades are expected to be the biggest problem during the next 10 years. In the following table the total staff of 9,723 has been reduced to 9,559.7 by the equating of\npart-time teachers.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n1. Fernie .... \t\n5\n6\n8\n13\n10\n11\n5\n11\n3\n3\n2\n9\n3\n3\n6\n8\n16\n2\n11\n29\n32\n5\n6\n35\n23\n5\n10\n7\n6\n27\n33\n27\n56\n16\n34\n85\n8\n38\n19\n31\n30\n12\n10\n13\n10\n6\n2\n2\n8\n14\n4\n8\n7\n35\n5\n20\n24\n43\n22\n60\n49\n22\n82\n20\n64\n23\n100\n26\n8\n27\n76\n15\n3\n34\n40\n63\n16\n102\n164\n240\n15\n22\n118\n88\n23\n45\n47\n33\n159\n126\n114\n488\n127\n285\n1,431\n109\n484\n114\n370\n386\n154\n50\n99\n1 53\n1 14\n3\n3\n79\n1 80\ni 28\n33\ni 34\n| 247\n1 15\n| 130\n99\n| 544\n23\n66.5\n51.7\n22.8\n90\n20\n68.3\n23.5\n108.5\n29\n8\n29.2\n83.6\n15\n3\n37.7\n43.3\n64.8\n18\n114.3\n176.5\n267.1\n15.5\n22.5\n124.7\n91.8\n25.3\n48\n49.8\n36\n167.4\n126\n119\n521.7\n139.8\n307.7\n1,615.5\n121\n529.2\n114\n412.3\n415\n184.5\n52.9\n104.3\n57.4\n14\n3\n3\n83.8\n80.4\n30.4\n34.3\n35.7\n271.8\n16\n140.9\n104.7\n589.1\n626\n2,037\n3. Kimberley _\t\n4. Windermere _\t\n1,405\n573\n2,555\n8. Slocan _ _\t\n459\n1,891\n647\n11. Trail\n2,972\n17 fii-prid Forts\n805\n13. Kettle Valley ... ....\n141\n840\n15. Penticton\t\n16. KpTempos\n2,579\n463\n42\n18. Golden\t\n999\n1,230\n20. Salmon Arm \t\n1,851\n590\n27. Vernon\n3,332\n5,321\n24. Kamloops .\n25. Barriere\n76. Birch Island\n7,153\n410\n571\n27. Williams Take\n3,111\n78 On-snel\n2,673\n29. T.illnoet\n30. South Carihnn\n605\n1,211\n31. Merritt _\t\n1,377\n1,019\n33. Chilliwack \t\n34 Ahhn.sfnr.1\n5,083\n4,055\n35. Langley\n3,448\n15,940\n37. Delta _. _. . ...\n4,145\n38. Richmond .. .\n9,484\n39. Vancouver\n47,627\n3,735\n41. Burnaby\n42. Maple Ridge _ \u00E2\u0080\u0094\n15,879\n3,574\n13,141\n12,608\n5,262\n46. Sechelt- \t\n1,437\n2,920\n1,536\n49. Ocean Falls \t\n272\n50 Que. n Charlntti.\n35\n51. Portland Canal\n46\n| 2,667\n53. Terrace\n54 Smith, rs\n55. Burns Lake\t\n2.451\n883\n874\n56. Vanderhoof\n919\nI 8,121\n58. McBride\n372\n59. Peace River South . \t\n1 4,167\n1 2,774\n| 19,648\n F 24\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nELEMENTARY SCHOOLS\u00E2\u0080\u0094Continued\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n62.\n63.\n64.\n65.\n66.\n67.\n68.\n69.\n70.\n71.\n72.\n75.\n76.\n77.\n78.\n79.\n80.\n81.\n82.\n84.\n85.\n86.\n87.\nUn.\nSooke\t\nSaanich\t\nGulf Islands-\nCowichan\t\nLake Cowichan..\nLadysmith\t\nNanaimo..\nQualicum...\nAlberni\t\nCourtenay.-\nCampbell River-\nMission\t\nAgassiz\t\nSummerland\t\nEnderby-\nUcluelet-Tofino-\nKitimat\t\nFort Nelson\t\nChilcotin\t\nVancouver Island West _\nVancouver Island North-\nCreston-Kasio\t\nStikine\t\nUnattached\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nComox\t\nBamfield..\nUniversity Hill-\nTotals _\n13\n14\n5\n19\n30\n9\n19\n15\n13\n16\n5\n2\n7\n4\n4\n5\n5\n5\n11\n11\n5\n1,164\n87\n81\n17\n99\n39\n40\n195\n33\n154\n110\n92\n63\n16\n21\n21\n14\n66\n14\n6\n12\n24\n62\n7\n17\n2\n10\n8,807\n90\n83\n17\n107.4\n40.7\n41.6\n211\n34\n169.8\n117.6\n98.9\n65.5\n16.3\n23.1\n22.5\n16\n73\n14\n7\n12\n24.5\n64.1\n7\n17.6\n2\n11.9\n9,559.7\n2,748\n2,679\n420\n2,979\n1,163\n1,184\n6,203\n975\n4,817\n3,626\n2,645\n1,895\n471\n666\n535\n363\n2,136\n347\n153\n246\n504\n1,788\n144\n564\n32\n284\n282,158\nDISTRICT-EMPLOYED INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF (NOT\nASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC SCHOOLS)\nDistrict Number\nand Name\n7. Nelson\t\n16. Keremeos\t\n26. Birch Island\n34. Abbotsford __\n35. Langley\t\n36. Surrey\t\n37. Delta\t\nNumber of\nTeachers\n___ 3\n__- 1\n- 1\n38. Richmond ___\n39. Vancouver _\n 1\n 9\n 1\n 1\n 6\n40. New Westminster 2\n41. Burnaby 1\n42. Maple Ridge 7\n44. North Vancouver 2\n47. Powell River 1\n53. Terrace 5\n54\nDistrict Number\nand Name\nSmithers\nNumber of\nTeachers\n 1\n56.\n61.\n62.\n63.\n65.\n66\nVanderhoof\t\nGreater Victoria\nSooke - _ _ -.\nSaanich \t\nCowichan \t\nLake Cowichan\n1\n10\n- 4\n7\n3\n_____ 3\n68.\n70.\n71.\n75\nNanaimo\t\nAlberni \t\nCourtenay\t\nMission\n2\n1\n1\n 1\n76.\n86\nAgassiz\t\nCreston-Kaslo\t\n1\n______ 1\nTotal\t\n 85\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nSUMMARY OF ALL SCHOOLS\nF 25\nAn increase of 57 in the total number of schools in operation occurred between\nJune, 1966, and June, 1967. This was in spite of the closure of a large number of\nsmall rural schools and a decrease of 20 in schools enrolling Grades I to XII. The\ntotal increase in enrolment of 24,438 was the highest on record, as was the increase\nin total staff. In the accompanying table the total number of teachers and principals\nhas been reduced from 17,372 persons to 17,161.5 by equating the part-time instructional staff.\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n8\n8\n10\n11\n16\n13\n13\n7\n15\n4\n6\n4\n12\n4\n4\n8\n10\n20\n3\n15\n34\n36\n6\n7\n38\n26\n7\n13\n8\n8\n32\n36\n30\n68\n18\n40\n102\n9\n49\n22\n39\n39\n15\n12\n16\n12\n8\n7\n3\n10\n16\n6\n10\n10\n42\n7\n24\n26\n55\n66\n100\n85\n42\n136\n41\n99\n35\n200\n45\n25\n73\n144\n26\n28\n52\n66\n121\n27\n166\n272\n349\n21\n30\n160\n131\n44\n64\n67\n58\n264\n197\n177\n757\n189\n432\n2,251\n196\n831\n181\n528\n630\n261\n75\n153\n74\n46\n32\n9\n114\n118\n57\n54\n71\n392\n31\n198\n140\n876\n76\n124\n102.8\n51.5\n166.2\n45.1\n118.3\n37.5\n248.6\n55\n28\n91.2\n174.4\n29\n34\n64.7\n79\n143.8\n35\n211.3\n319.1\n435.3\n25.6\n36\n185.2\n151.8\n51.2\n76.1\n78.8\n69.5\n306.7\n221.1\n209\n886.5\n228.8\n510.8\n2,786.3\n245\n1,013.7\n209\n652.9\n750.3\n335.3\n88.9\n187.3\n89.4\n54\n34.1\n9.3\n137.3\n130\n69\n59.7\n83.6\n470.8\n38.3\n234.3\n160.7\n1,052.7\n1,703\n3,207\n3. Kimberley _ \t\n4. Windermere - \t\n2,414\n1,120\n4,034\n934\n2,904\n885\n11. Trail \t\n5,956\n12. Grand Forks -\t\n1,302\n13. Kettle Valley\t\n574\n14. Southern Okanagan \u00E2\u0080\u0094 \u00E2\u0080\u0094\t\n2,184\n4,465\n713\n758\n18. Golden - -\t\n19. Rpv.lsfnkR\n1,488\n1,961\n3,559\n929\n5,492\n23. Kelowna \t\n8,378\n10,705\n25. Barriere\n26. Birch Island \t\n575\n759\n27. Williams Lake\t\n4,399\n3,953\n79. T.illoo.t\n1,031\n1,671\n31. Merritt _ \t\n1,996\n1,660\n33. Chilliwack.. _ \t\n34 Ahhntsfnrrl\n8,141\n6,160\n5,367\n36. Surrey _ _\t\n37. Delta _\t\n23,984\n6,106\n38, Richmond\n13,982\n39. Vancouver...\n73,914\n6,426\n41. Bnrnahy\n42. Maple Ridge.\u00E2\u0080\u0094\t\n26,506\n5,660\n18,219\n19,615\n8,482\n46. Sechelt\n47. Powell River\t\n2,084\n4,577\n48. Howe Sound _ -\t\n2,145\n49. Ocean Falls\t\n1,095\n50. Queen Charlotte\t\n750\n51. Portland Canal \t\n211\n52. Prince Rupert- ..... . . ...\n3,767\n53. Terrace\t\n3,519\n1,682\n1,379\n2,023\n12,430\n58. McBride \t\n802\n6,164\n3,907\n30,281\n F 26\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nSUMMARY OF ALL SCHOOLS\u00E2\u0080\u0094Continued\nDistrict Number and Name\nNumber of\nSchools\nNumber of\nDivisions\nNumber of\nTeachers\nNumber of\nPupils\n62. Sooke\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n63. Saanich..\n64. Gulf Islands-\n65. Cowichan..\n66. Lake Cowichan-\n67. Ladysmith\t\n68. Nanaimo\t\n69. Qualicum\t\n70. Alberni..\n71. Courtenay-\t\n72. Campbell River.-\n75. Mission\t\n76. Agassiz_\n77. Summerland-\n78. Enderby-\n79. Ucluelet-Tofino-\n80. Kitimat\t\n81. Fort Nelson\t\n82. Chilcotin\t\n83. Portage Mountain..\n84. Vancouver Island West\t\n85. Vancouver Island North..\n86. Creston-Kaslo\t\n87. Stikine\t\nFour unattached districts-\nTotals\t\n17\n18\n6\n23\n9\n10\n33\n11\n22\n20\n17\n17\n6\n3\n8\n5\n5\n6\n6\n1\n7\n17\n14\n6\n5\n1,429\n132\n137\n26\n165\n57\n74\n297\n52\n228\n190\n147\n99\n32\n37\n28\n20\n94\n21\n7\n26\n25\n82\n103\n13\n63\n14,263\n151\n158\n30\n198.4\n67.7\n89.6\n349.9\n65\n270.3\n224.1\n178.9\n117.5\n38.2\n50.1\n35.5\n26\n112\n24\n9\n32.2\n28.9\n97.3\n123.1\n14\n72\n17,161.5\n3,918\n4,325\n646\n4,829\n1,654\n2,109\n9,326\n1,524\n7,006\n5,980\n4,111\n3,066\n931\n1,179\n734\n520\n2,900\n542\n192\n809\n527\n2,070\n2,964\n300\n1,979\n445,228\nTEACHERS' SALARIES BY TYPE OF SCHOOL\nThe following tables classify teachers according to position, type of school, and\nannual salary obtained by multiplying the June, 1967, salary by 10. Each salary\nthat is listed represents a class interval of \u00C2\u00B1$250; for example, $7,500 includes\nsalaries from $7,250 to $7,749.\nTeachers and Principals Enrolling Divisions\nSalary\nElementary\nElem.-\nJunior\nSec.\nElem.-\nSenior\nSec.\nJunior\nSec.\nSecondary\nSenior\nSec.\nTotal\nCumulative\nper Cent\n$14,500\n3\n10\n14\n17\n68\n45\n61\n67\n70\n209\n119\n257\n246\n300\n706\n1,396\n1,033\n1,060\n1,147\n1,063\n548\n181\n45\n1\n1\n7\n4\n11\n29\n13\n26\n25\n37\n60\n75\n72\n71\n57\n57\n23\n16\n2\n1\n1\n~~7\n12\n38\n17\n53\n16\n24\n9\n32\n32\n63\n58\n47\n33\n15\n11\n5\n3\n5\n13\n50\n57\n116\n72\n69\n124\n94\n131\n191\n202\n175\n77\n18\n9\n4\n1\n2\n~~3\n55\n84\n287\n161\n316\n179\n153\n156\n184\n206\n247\n266\n170\n80\n14\n6\n3\n2\n__\n11\n56\n20\n48\n38\n16\n22\n26\n26\n41\n52\n31\n13\n~2\n4\n10\n16\n19\n72\n121\n188\n502\n336\n771\n437\n545\n582\n673\n1,161\n2,013\n1,683\n1,554\n1,407\n1,167\n599\n209\n53\n100.0\n14,0nn\n100.0\n13,500\n99.9\n1 300O\n99.8\n17,500\n99.7\n12,000\t\n/ll 5nn\n99.1\n98.3\n11 ono\n97.0\n10,500\n93.4\ninnnn\n91.0\n\u00C2\u00AB,500\n85.6\nonnn\n82.5\n8,500\n78.6\n8,000.\n7,500\n74.5\n69.7\n7,ono\n61.5\n6,50(1\n47.2\n6,000\n35.3\n5,500\n24.3\n5,000\t\n4,500\n14.4\n6.1\n4,000 \t\n1.9\n3,500 _ -\n0.4\nTotals\n8,702\n587\n477\n1,408\n2,575\n411\n14,122 |\n1\nTotal reported, 14,122; median salary, $6,847; mean salary, $7,200.\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nF 27\nTeachers Not Enrolling a Division (Including\nSpecial Staff and Part-time Teachers)\nSalary\nElementary\nElem.-\nJunior\nSec.\nElem.-\nSenior\nSec.\nJunior\nSec.\nSecondary\nSenior\nSec.\nTotal\nCumulative\nper Cent\n$16,500 _ _\n1\n1\n4\n4\n2\n3\n11\n9\n25\n4\n33\n22\n17\n68\n67\n48\n43\n32\n29\n13\n18\n38\n27\n39\n36\n17\n20\n12\n1\n1\n3\n1\n2\n2\n3\n6\n5\n5\n7\n7\n4\n4\n10\n8\n7\n6\n8\n1\n1\n1\n2\n1\n3\n1\n2\n4\n3\n4\n1\n14\n5\n21\n9\n16\n6\n6\n4\n10\n6\n8\n8\n6\n2\n2\n1\n1\n1\n1\n\t\n1\n4\n4\n4\n14\n10\n15\n16\n39\n21\n42\n26\n24\n37\n27\n34\n54\n58\n38\n30\n10\n6\n2\n1\n2\n5\n1\n_ -\n1\n1\n10\n9\n13\n17\n18\n15\n30\n51\n123\n56\n124\n58\n61\n67\n55\n67\n64\n61\n52\n40\n17\n10\n5\n4\n2\n2\n1\n1\n2\n3\n1\n3\n5\n3\n6\n7\n27\n12\n18\n14\n4\n12\n10\n16\n19\n12\n8\n4\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n3\n1\n100.0\n1_,\u00E2\u0084\u00A2\n15,500\t\n2\n18\n14\n21\n25\n47\n35\n67\n85\n227\n112\n230\n115\n135\n146\n123\n201\n220\n194\n153\n116\n58\n33\n28\n47\n33\n52\n39\n20\n28\n16\n1\n100.0\n15,000\t\n14,500\t\n14,000\t\n99.9\n99.2\n98.7\n13,500 \t\n97.9\n13,000\t\n12,500 \t\n96.9\n95.2\n12,000 \t\n93.8\n11,500\n91.3\n11,000\n88.1\n10,500 \t\n79.5\n10,000 \t\n75.2\n9,500\n66.5\n9,000 -\n62.2\n8,500 . .\n8,000 \t\n57.1\n51.6\n7,500 .\n46.9\n7,000\n39.3\n6,500 ..\n31.0\n6,000 \t\n23.6\n5,500\t\n17.8\n5,000 -\t\n13.4\n4,500\n11.2\n4,000\t\n10.0\n3,500 .\n8.9\n3,000 \t\n7.2\n2,500 \t\n5.9\n2,000 \t\n3.9\n1,500 _.\n2.5\n1,000\t\n1.7\n500\t\n249\t\n0.6\n0.0\nTotals\t\n644\n108\n135\n526\n1,037\n192\n2,642\n\t\nTotal reported, 2,642; median salary, $8,079; mean salary, $8,115.\n F 28 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nSupervising Principals (Principals Not Enrolling a Division)\nSalary\nElementary\nElem.-\nJunior\nSec.\nElem.-\nSenior\nSec.\nJunior\nSec.\nSecondary\nSenior\nSec.\nTotal\nCumulative\nper Cent\n$19,000 \t\n16\n11\n65\n37\n32\n28\n32\n15\n15\n11\n13\n7\n3\n3\n2\n-\n1\n3\n1\n4\n4\n3\n1\n3\n3\n1\n2\n1\n......\n2\n1\n1\n1\n1\n3\n6\n3\n2\n1\n2\n1\n......\n1\n5\n6\n14\n14\n6\n11\n6\n4\n1\n1\n1\n10\n2\n3\n11\n14\n14\n7\n15\n4\n4\n6\n2\n1\n2\n4\n1\n1\n1\n5\n1\n3\n3\n2\n1\n1\n......\n1\n1\n12\n3\n9\n18\n25\n47\n37\n95\n63\n49\n41\n39\n20\n20\n15\n16\n8\n4\n3\n1\n100.0\n18,500 .\n99.8\n18,000 \t\n99.6\n17,500 \t\n97.4\n17,000\t\n16,500 \t\n96.8\n95.1\n16,000 \t\n91.7\n15,500 _\t\n87.0\n15,000 .\t\n78.1\n14,500\t\n14,000 .\n71.1\n53.1\n13,500\t\n41.2\n13,000\t\n12,500 \t\n31.9\n24.2\n12,000\t\n16.8\n11,500 \t\n13.0\n11,000 \t\n9.3\n10,500\t\n10,000 . .\n6.4\n3.4\n9,500._ _\n1.9\n9,000\t\n8,500\u00E2\u0080\u0094\t\n8,000 \t\n1.1\n0.6\n0.4\n7,500 \t\n2\n0.4\n7.000 .\t\nTotals\n290\n28\n23\n69\n102\n17\n529\nTotal reported, 529; median salary, $14,119; mean salary, $13,899.\nFull-time Teachers and Teaching Principals\nSalary\nElementary\nElem-\nJunior\nSec.\nElem.-\nSenior\nSec.\nJunior\nSec.\nSecondary\nSenior\nSec.\nTotal\nCumulative\nper Cent\n$16,500 \t\n3\n10\n14\n21\n72\n46\n64\n78\n79\n232\n123\n290\n268\n317\n771\n1,461\n1,078\n1,099\n1,169\n1,076\n549\n182\n35\n1\n3\n1\n3\n3\n10\n10\n16\n34\n20\n33\n29\n41\n70\n83\n79\n77\n64\n58\n24\n16\n3\n1\n5\n1\n21\n17\n59\n26\n69\n22\n30\n13\n42\n37\n69\n65\n53\n35\n15\n13\n5\n3\n1\n4\n4\n4\n14\n10\n20\n29\n88\n77\n158\n97\n93\n160\n121\n164\n244\n260\n212\n105\n27\n12\n6\n1\n1\n10\n9\n13\n19\n18\n18\n85\n135\n410\n217\n440\n236\n213\n223\n239\n273\n310\n326\n222\n118\n28\n15\n7\n3\n\t\n3\n1\n3\n5\n3\n15\n18\n83\n32\n66\n52\n20\n34\n36\n42\n60\n64\n38\n16\n1\n2\n1\n100.0\n16,000 \t\n15,500 \t\n1\n17\n18\n31\n41\n66\n107\n187\n273\n728\n447\n999\n550\n679\n727\n796\n1,357\n2,227\n1,872\n1,701\n1,507\n1,205\n615\n216\n41\n100.0\n15,000 \t\n99.9\n14,500 _\n99.8\n14,000\n99.7\n13,500\t\n13,000\t\n99.5\n99.3\n12,500 \t\n98.9\n12,000 . \t\n98.2\n11,500 \t\n97.1\n11,000 \t\n95.4\n10,500\t\n91.0\n10,000 \t\n88.3\n9,500 \t\n82.2\n9,000\t\n8,500\t\n8,000\t\n78.8\n74.7\n70.3\n7,500...\t\n7,000 .\t\n65.4\n57.2\n6,500\t\n6,000 \t\n5,500 \t\n5,000 -\t\n43.6\n32.2\n21.8\n12.7\n4,500 \t\n5.3\n4,000 \t\n1.6\n3,500 \t\n0.2\nTotals\n9,043\n675\n604\n1,911\n3,589\n594\n16,409\n\t\nTotal reported, 16,409; median salary, $6,985; mean salary, $7,430.\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nDistrict-employed Special Instructors\nf 29\nSalary\nNumber of Instructors\nFull Time Part Time Total\nCumulative\nper Cent\n$13,500._\n13,000-\n12,500-\n12,000...\n11,500..\n11,000..\n10,500-\n10,000..\n9,500-\n9,000-\n8,500..\n8,000..\n7,500..\n7,000-\n6,500..\n6,000..\n5,500..\n5,000..\n4,500..\n4,000_\n3,500.\n3,000..\n2,500._\n2,000..\n1,500..\n1,000-\nTotals..\n6\n1\n2\n1\n1\n4\n2\n10\n7\n6\n3\n7\n3\n1\n57\n28\n100.0\n98.8\n97.6\n6\n96.5\n1\n89.4\n2\n88.2\n1\n85.9\n1\n84.7\n4\n83.5\n3\n78.8\n10\n75.3\n7\n63.5\n6\n55.3\n4\n48.2\n7\n43.5\n4\n35.3\n3\n30.6\n2\n27.1\n6\n24.7\n3\n17.6\n4\n14.1\n4\n9.4\n4\n4.7\n85\nMedian salary: Full time, $7,325; part time, $3,083; total, $6,376.\nPart-time Teachers\nSalary\nElementary\nElem.-\nJunior\nSec.\nElem.-\nSenior\nSec.\nJunior\nSec.\nSecondary\nSenior\nSec.\nTotal\nCumulative\nper Cent\n$17,500\n1\n2\n3\n2\n3\n4\n10\n16\n12\n17\n48\n38\n53\n38\n17\n20\n11\n1\n1\n1\n4\n1\n3\n1\n2\n4\n3\n1\n2\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n_\n2\n1\n3\n2\n2\n5\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n1\n2\n3\n1\n1\n3\n2\n3\n1\n1\n1\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n12,000\t\n11,500\t\n11,000 \t\n1\n1\n1\n2\n2\n1\n1\n5\n6\n5\n6\n16\n20\n17\n21\n59\n44\n65\n41\n20\n27\n15\n1\n100.0\n99.7\n99.7\n10,500-\t\n99.5\n10,000\t\n99.2\n9,500 .\n98.7\n9,000\t\n98.1\n8,500\t\n8,000 \t\n97.9\n97.6\n7,500 _\n97.6\n7,000 ..\n96.3\n6,500\t\n6,000\t\n94.7\n93.4\n5,500-\t\n91.8\n5,000\t\n87.5\n4,500\t\n82.2\n4,000...\t\n77.7\n3,500 \t\n72.1\n3,000 ..\n56.5\n2,500\t\n44.8\n2,000 \t\n27.6\n1,500\n16.7\n1,000\n11.4\n500 \t\n249 ... \t\n4.2\n0.3\nTotals\n299\n20\n8\n24\n22\n7\n377\nTotal reported, 380; median salary, $2,972; mean salary, $3,273.\n F 30 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nEXPENDITURES FOR EDUCATION, CALENDAR YEAR 1966\n(Exclusive of Capital Expenditures from By-law Funds)\nTotal expenditure by school districts $214,156,353.00\nAdd Department of Education expenditures for administration,\ncorrespondence schools, Teachers' Pension Fund, free textbooks and maps, adult education, vocational and technical\nschools, grants to universities, services, etc. 55,061,616.40\nGrand total expenditures $269,217,969.40\nCOST PER PUPIL, CALENDAR YEAR 1966\nGrand total cost of education $269,217,969.40\nDeduct\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nCapital expenditure from current revenue $3,051,654.00\nDebt charges on school district debt 27,347,533.00\nDepartment of Education expenditures for\ncorrespondence schools, adult education, vocational and technical schools,\ngrants to universities, etc. 47,040,052.51\n 77,439,239.51\nTotal operating cost $191,778,729.89\nOperating cost per pupil for year on daily average attendance of 408,452 $469.53\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT F 31\nn^ff>\u00C2\u00ABv.\or*>nwt^^hO\ooTfoooio^tt*(novhHiA.wvo^i,M'vor.iHr.'ooO'tHt-.\noovocnot^wi^voo\\u00C2\u00BBoopH\flooocor-TrcioH\u00C2\u00BBHoo^t\u00C2\u00BB(>ma^ooaoiHTH\ooo^ro\"rii>^\n_\ncn so tn to c* Os cn t^ tn c\Os v* T-t^o\C~ in so^o\c* o\ os so cA tn ca t- t^os so co in o\" r-~ ** ri ri -* vorH t-~\n5\nOi/.TfNOsO\^^oonNfnm'tMf*or.O\0(*.mrn\n0^\u00C2\u00AB^O^W5'tH\CP.HOtOP.t^fflt-'CrlVD\u00C2\u00BBCOniO'lt(J>t~-0\gi(J1M'tlrtW.>OOrHOOOTt\nHrin rl T-t cn ** ca th ca cn tn ca i-t c*. N N o r. w o m ih c.\n\u00C2\u00AB\u00E2\u0096\u00A0 *H ^t r-l\ne\nOwU\nrtOTfli-iOOOOCO\n! o tn\nooots tnonroooro0r-i\n1 o o\nO O O OS\n^ootvoorHi^aNO_.or-oOTt(NO^or-c.m\n** g p\nro rf 0_ io D \u00C2\u00A9coinc?.\n1 O so\nrt cnooTt\n&o^hviN'jhom-_\u00C2\u00ABo>.or'.-ne\ntr^tnoosoootnTtcnTt\ni o\"oC\nT-t cn r* tn\nT^o\oo^-i/.inTtor.^Hr^TtviM-o_NO\t^^Hcso.\n0\ncn cA m T-t so\n! CS rH\nvi-.t. cnwoi \u00C2\u00ABn c.r~*oc.-~cs.-.c-\n&*_-\nr^\nvo\n^>!>TtM\OHNN^nHrfibOO\ONrtTl-MM\0\D'tOHOT-I^OsOOrHOVOHNr.r.\u00C2\u00BB\nVO\nas\n_-._!\n<_ >\nc^ooinrnt^oornh-vnrJ^Ooocor^ot^r^cnoorHTt^o\oo^\o^or^r^oo^rHo^^^rroo^\n^. ^ ^ \u00C2\u00B0\u00C2\u00B0_. ^1 ^1 \u00C2\u00B0i. \u00C2\u00B0_, P ^\u00C2\u00B0L *~1 \"\"*.. ^ O O),^,^ U)VO O H H H OV t^O OS CD 0\, O ^t^intNTJ^t-^TTt-^^in\nin coo\cOTtT^s6ost>ooTt(St^cAtnTtT^sO'TttnoscAtn oo*\n^hOmo\int^inr-(inf^0^mN^MNTfTl-oO'^\ot^r-<^ooTfinavirtor^^oovDM\nrt\nQS\np-HHH(S rH CS rH rl HH\u00C2\u00AB CA tn ^O Tt CA rH rH CSCSmvOtnCOC-mTtN\nPi\n<\n__\n\u00C2\u00AB* rt IO rt\n\u00C2\u00BBo\nOOOOOOfnTfC-OOOOOO\0OmO^tOOOOOOOOOOOOOOv.O\no\no\n. c \"\nooir>ooOrH-*oooooOOmmr->nooo,ou-i\u00C2\u00BBnooooinoooo\u00C2\u00BBnN\00\mr-rt^^\u00C2\u00BBt^^\u00C2\u00ABH(nu^ooMrrlvot^vO\"no\o^DTrHln^-HOr^^H\n{\u00E2\u0080\u00A2> rH 0\HO\r.HN ^t CS l-H CS CA tn sQ n 0\ H (S rt rl rt Ifl rH^ l/^ O CO CO rt\nCS r-. \0 CO\nu\npi<\ngt*H\nt^oonin^^^voiflO\\u00C2\u00ABOH^o\^WNV.hioinh^mrriOhTfiriv.Ttor-'tr*rtrt(jloo\noooinTrmoiarn^^ONOt^^oo^t^Ot^ooNhcoinnro^Tfaioortrtr-mr-rf^ooinc^\nPi\nrn(nHN^N^c.tN-r4M'*rt,rir-tf)rtf*TH0oc>HNmr.o\r.inr. ^nsosooooOTt^so r-t Tt\n\u00C2\u00AB\u00E2\u0096\u00A0 rH rH\nO\na\u00C2\u00B0\nn.\non\n4. W\noH\u00C2\u00A7\nS.2-9\nE 2\nwf*\owtNOhiovDOvooor.^Hrtoocoviooofoorf)0\or.oi'flO\inooi/.ovico^o\o\nr^^t^o\t^c^rHrJrHONMVOr-OOvOt^ON^OS^hlO(\u00C2\u00BB(Sr.O\in\nO\nm^mvoNmr.^'^r.r.HrtVOwiH^ooioTtmrtMTtnrtiN^^Nr.oi^m^^^Nt^cn\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0*H^OOOvO>\DO\*^Mxt^HN^V^*^'*(\u00C2\u00BBOivOV.mNVOMO\vO(-\Hrtin\omVl\no\u00C2\u00B0\nCA\nDHnrtr. ^t i-H cn Hrics tn tn O nmr.rtr.r.itMtf.t^moo ih tt \u00C2\u00AB ro\nr-T in rH\na\no\nv0OO0\00O'tv00\in^000\inin\u00C2\u00ABHOHO60OHWTthOM'-OOV.hOOOCMnOf'O\nr.WTfa!^\Ofr)0\r-H^lO(-^o^'*rl0^oolnovD(rl^ovl0^o\^v\u00C2\u00A33rlOKllfllnOrlr-tr)\njig\n'^MlnrtrtrO'*rth^\u00C2\u00BBaart\no\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A25 3\nN^io^^cnwcooN^^osnOOvot^^m\o^^ro\o^rtt^hv.wo\r^r^rf)N(Stoinr)\nOS\n^'n^otnMr.^rt^mrtlnMrtc^^nn^rtmlnr^rt^-mf^^tm^^t^H^Tt(f)OfnTtrt(r)\nV> rH HrtM rH rtrtrHnnmhrtlflrt\na\no\nffl\nU\n1-1\nCC\nOC\nON\u00C2\u00AB,tmOOCOOO*P.iriOrtONOO\00\Om'HN^O\u00C2\u00A9OOOOf-OatsHNO\n*S_ w\nrtHOONO\riHrtTtomv.\OaiWinOlfiMOin\u00C2\u00AB)ri(J\OinTf\OOlftO\HriOsrilrtO>0OrO-Dml^O\NO\C^\u00C2\u00BB\DmOO\vOI^'*VOTrM\u00C2\u00ABrt>Otnh-rnrtrtmt\u00C2\u00BBVDl/.\n^^oo\u00C2\u00AB^r.rtNrt^(_-in^oc.Mrt^rrhfnvvDfno\>ov.o3'-ior^hoortrtcoiHO\i/.r'\n><\nS9\n._-! ooc-cnOv.V-a\\cnHOOOinO-inON*inf.OhOvDO\OmviOvOOOO(riino\^OOi^\nNv\0W.Orv1ionin^Ht(fi\ooo\ni\u00E2\u0080\u0094i\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2O H\n&0- rH rt rtrtM t-i rtrtCOrtCSO\rtCO\nQ\n<\"\n\u00C2\u00BB\u00E2\u0096\u00A0*\ng\nW\nPL,\nu\nX\n1\npq\na\ne\na.\n1\nc\ntu\n__\no\nE\n3\nz\no\n3\no\no\njS\nCJ\nc\nc\nc\nX\n_\n_-\nE\n_-\na.\n1-\n_\u00E2\u0080\u00A2\n\u00C2\u00A3\nl-\n4\n\u00C2\u00A3\nft\nc\nc\nc\n\u00C2\u00AB\nt\nc\n55\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0-\nB\ne\nfl\nc\ntf\ni\n\u00C2\u00A3\nc\nt-\nc\n<\n7\nc\nh\nw\n_^\n_.\nc\nIi\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A00\nc\n>\n\u00C2\u00A3\n>\ni\noo\na\ncd\n1 \u00E2\u0096\u00A0--\n5\na e\nS\u00C2\u00A3\n6--\nIe\na. p.\nc\nEE\nis\nI\na\n\u00C2\u00A3\n_\n\"c\nC\n._:\nc_\nE\n1-\n<\n_.\nc\nE\n\u00C2\u00AB\n3\n'\u00C2\u00AB\na\nw\n3\nS c\ni S\n_a^\nr\n1\nc\n--\ni\ni\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2fc\na\n'C\n9\nPC\nT3\nc\ne\ni\ns\n_\n__\n0\n-\n_\u00E2\u0080\u00A2\nE\ni\nc\n3\n:\nC\n%\nc\n1\nc\nc\n\u00C2\u00A3\nB\n0\nI\n1\nc\nc\n>\nc\ncc\n1-\n-\no\nB\n1\n8\n_\nc\n_:\n<\n1\n5\n>\nt\n:\n0_\n-\n1\ne\nc\nI\np_\ns\nc\nI\nE\n>\ntH\no\n1\nw\ns >\n^^\nfl.\nt\n\u00C2\u00AB\n1\n1\nT^cAtriTtc*QOO\OT-tcAcnTtinsoT^cx}o\&T*cAcnTttnso't^oo\n F 32\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nOC\nc\nn\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nOS Tf\nt-\no-\na.\nCJ\nc\no\noc\nc\ne\nT*\nm\nCS\nTt\nc\nVC\nC-\nftONhcr\noc\nc\nc\nt- c\nOOs^OMO\nCSCO^^^^^^^V^^O^OQ^^Q^^^y-,^,^^^^^^^,^^^^^,^^^^^^^---,\n\"\u00E2\u0080\u009E^_H^^omv.rt\u00C2\u00ABr^O\Mcviino^iN^Kji<.m\o^^OmO\0\u00C2\u00ABn'*^\"ovC'*v.\oiri>trt\n_J\no\nrspincovOrtrt^^hNvOOvDhmNNirOrtH^i^riHiny:iflooiriO\r(vcO'tirrtOTf\n^tM^^^^^^^^^^r^r^rtOroOMt^r^Tfro^\O^OeccooOTtvO^>*^0\cOrH(N\n\u00C2\u00BB-* fj, so co Tt_ tSm so Tf in in oo t\u00E2\u0080\u0094 rn o\_ tn r-^ cN \u00C2\u00A9 l> oo Tf so a\ cs cs co n co \u00C2\u00A9^ o^ Tt m co co in co rt Tf co\n\u00C2\u00A3T Os Tf ri CA ri ri rt\" rt\" Tf Of CS*\" CO W rH~ rf rt' Tf\" CO CN CS\" rt\" rt\"\nS\n0\u00E2\u0080\u009E u\n\u00C2\u00A333\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094 S 3\n^OiNNMO\nTf\noomoocoooinooooin\u00C2\u00BBncSTf\no o\no\no\n00 o o\no rs m CT\ rn rt\nCS\nOOC\OOOOvOCT\OTfO^OTf\00\\nO in\no\no\nTf o m\ntn Tf CO Tf ocooor^c_o\ca\w^rHO\oot~~cst>Tf\n^,^TfO\^inCOOv0^lr-\u00C2\u00BB^Ttinfr)0^a\OrtOminOrtrtlninOvDtl-OOWrtlnWO>OV-\ncsin\Dco^c^voin^TfincSo\cso^csr^cSrtTfcortTf^oc-NOOroMcoTfooocsoTfoioooo>nTfOcsoocoooo\nt^^o>oTfrtO\"ncNCSOOinOOOCSO\r^OOi_-.ini>inOcoin\"^-\u00C2\u00BBnr~CSTro\OOOOOt^O\n\u00C2\u00A9SOC_S^r^SO^r^O-COOSOlnTtCNtn(^rtSOrtinO\TfCS^Ttrt\u00C2\u00A9lnTtrtrtt^TfSOe7-COCNa\rt\nS3'?\nOSS\nrnoocs>ncs>nr^rso^c>\coocococSTfrH\u00C2\u00ABn^ooo^cscsOTfvj3cor^OrHONincscscSTfO\0\nSO CO m rt rt CS CS rtrH rt rt m rt Tf OS Tt rHrHOO rt CN CO rt CO t-> t-< t-i\n(fi- t4 rH ,-h\n\n\u00C2\u00AB^-SOOOCOTt\u00C2\u00A9OCO\u00C2\u00A90\u00C2\u00A9TtCOOOO\\u00C2\u00A9om\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9OCSCS\u00C2\u00A9t>incOOcomsO\u00C2\u00A90\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9CO\u00C2\u00A9\n3-3\nCSTtinTt0scS\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9S0\u00C2\u00A9s0in\u00C2\u00A9s0\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9OCScSC-\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9O\u00C2\u00A9Ttc0O\u00C2\u00A9rt00\u00C2\u00A900inO\u00C2\u00A9OTf\u00C2\u00A900in\nO O\n0\n\DMhooonnio,*rtio^nvOino^vDM\0(No'^^oortN^inMOir)ri>'HOvoinr-0\\ncor-^oOrtrovoTf t-^socoTfsosocNt^inr^inOinoor-c^cot^acrsascoocosooNincooosort\nmfOlnCO\OCOCSTj- CS'*tCOSOCOTf'TtCOCNCNCO-0(NSOTtTtO\CSinC\lncOrHrHCSrtrHrH rH\ntfi\" CS r- rt\nS\"3 S\nill\nrt(-0<^sor^ooooinininOOt^so\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9Ttcvi^^insocoOrt\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9co\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9so^t^Ttocoinsoin\nNO\C.O\f-00\^.OvvQOOvOinOOvOx^trfOvHrtON'^Mt^C-^t'f-^.MftOrtVOinm\nt h m (S N os \u00C2\u00BB ih m^o^o^m^-0 oo w.ainhrtri^o\'no\or.r.r.cot~>r(os(rirtcoc.o oo \u00E2\u0096\u00A0* N\n0\w.oV\"(n co co\"n corit-^rH ass^o\o\"oCTtcocNcoTt\"t^incs\"t\u00C2\u00BBr-^ri\u00C2\u00A9inoC^ oi Tt\"\nrtOr.rtmMrt^rt^nNrtlOOCOlClfirthVOyOCOVOrt^iriCOrtCO^^Inl/.IO'tOON^^\nOV CS S\u00C2\u00A9 CS CO CN rt r. r. rt rt rt \C COCOOCSCS TfrtCNmrtTtTtCSrt CN\npu\" 2\n*H CS\na\no\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2h'-j\n\OrHcSOrfOOCO^OO\OOoortOOTft^coooinoortuor-Oc_s\u00C2\u00BBn,kDr^ino\Oco,ttO\u00C2\u00BBnooOO\no^r^\DOC^\u00C2\u00ABnoinco^\u00C2\u00BBno^coTfc^rtOrorScocNcS\Dt^^OOint^incoOTfO\inTf\nx \D co ih \u00C2\u00A9 ih tt ^vO N o th if) o^m r-rr.om'tOTf(Soor)r-Tj'OvOc.inoino|fl,!.|oc>rtvo\n5 3\nro^nOCSrt ro Tf CO SO \o CO rt O Tf CSt\u00E2\u0080\u0094VD cS^cooro\"rnOOOo\"inrOTf O\sOcnOsOsso'c~\O00 CO COOrn\ncocorHOOTj-^DcocN r-p'rrir)'tl^M^'ar.(_-!\u00C2\u00BBr.W-'nv.,fl'r,)V-0\,t^,'Hr.rtrtO\rt cn \u00C2\u00BB\u00E2\u0080\u0094i\nTf VI CO rH CN rt \\u00C2\u00A3> ,_ CS rt rt\n-_fl-\nMf.mmMnooor.oONO\Ooco(atsnooo\OnOO'jr-om(CO*oNOW-Omo\ncOTtoococor^ini^rrtcooooortOOcoTfOTfo<-__cso\DOifirtOOTfc.OfflOOy^o^\on\u00C2\u00AB-rtfnvopir-voh'o,fh\nr*\nCN^SOinSOfOmCOCS COCOTtcOinr^CNTtOrtO\rtCSTflnsOCOTtr~TfrtOOCScOCNrHr--rt rH rt\nTf in CN\" ri CS rt\" r-^ oo ,-h\" ^ CA ri ri t^\nr-r--o>no>nTftnoooOOincooo,^fTfcsOinOinOrtOrtOOO>ncomcsoOOincoo\nio\n<\u00C2\u00BBcoTrr^r^o\c\u00C2\u00ABcoion^\nmsocor-csr-mcs r-minin\OrtroOa\Tfa\^ocortinc-cSTfcoooomcScscNCSoocs csro\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0o 2\n(N CO rt rt CS rt m ,_ fS rt rt\nto-\ns\nrt\nj\nj\na\nu\nu\n3\nCfl\nCD\na_\n>\n3\nC\n_-\nU\n>\n3\nUl\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0rt\nC\n0\nc\nt\nC\no\nu\nti\n\u00C2\u00A3\n3\nC\nCO\nu rt\n_S1\nc\nrt\nJ-\nQJ\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2a\n3\n0\nT^\n4\ns\n1\nCO\nc\n3\n\"rt\nf\n3\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2o\n3\n2\ns\n0\nO\n-G\nCfl\ns\nCl\n5\n0\n0\nU\n\u00C2\u00BB 5\nS. rt\n^> =\nZ E> w\n0\ntrt\nC\nrt\naj\nu\no\na\n-3\nu\nc\n4\naj\n3\no\nrt\nU\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0a\nc\n0\n1\n1\n(J\nH\na.\n1\nCO\n<__\nrt\nHi\nCfl\n3\n\u00C2\u00A3\n3\nPQ\nC\nc\nu\nOJ\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2a\n3\nrt\n>\nO\nCD\n0\no\nu\ns\nPh\nX\nPC\nu\ns\ntrt _H U\n> > >\na) u +\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\no o rt\n\u00C2\u00AB rt \n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2a\nrt\n>-]\no\n1\nrt\n2\nE\n3\nt\n0\n3\no\nl-\n4.\n<\n>\nrt\n3\na\n3\nO\nU\np<\n3 V\nrt c\nOS\nR\n<\n>\n1\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0a\n3\nW\nc\nEh\n4\n3\nD\ne\n5\n3\nC\ni_-\n*4\nz\nc\nC\ni\nC\nSe\nO 3\n00 o\nrt u\no \u00C2\u00AB\ncOTf\u00C2\u00BBn^t^ooO\OrtCScorfiny5t^co\"i^\"OrtcScOTf\nTt\ntt\ntt\nTf\nTf\nTf\nTf\nIT)\nm\nin\nin\nin\n\nTt\nCO\nto-\ni-C\ncs\nO O ir\n\u00C2\u00A9 vo \u00C2\u00A9 in\nt^-\nm m r-\nO rt O CS\nCS\nr-rt ir\nso O co Tf\nm\n'\nco vo r-\nTf rH CO\nTt\n.\u00C2\u00BB\nTt in\nCTs\ntO-\np \u00C2\u00A9 C\n\u00C2\u00BBn ! in \u00C2\u00ABn\n\u00C2\u00A3 Tt VC\nCO\nt-i r-\nSD\nTt vo ir\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2n\nin rt\nO\nTfvD CT\nm\"\n\u00C2\u00A9\"\nCS CS\nTf\nto-\nin\nSD\n\t\nto\no \u00C2\u00A9 c\no\nO !\nCO\n\u00C2\u00A9 rt c\nm\n\u00C2\u00A9 :\nOs\nr- os r-\nCA\nCN\nS ^\nCS\nOs\n& r-\nO\nto\n\u00C2\u00A9^\nto\n\u00C2\u00A9 Tf CT\nin oo o so\nCO\nOs rt t-\nm cs Tf co\nTf\noo o vc\nCS CN Tf \u00C2\u00A9\nCS\nrt o f\nOS \u00C2\u00A9 rt (N\nso\nO CO Tj\nso co m\nin\nCN n \u00C2\u00A9\ncs\ni-H r-l SC\n>l/.fr.\nCS\nr- t- oc\nSO ON CS CN\nOs\nTt Tt r-\ncn\" oo\" Tt\"\n00\nm oo i\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nso\nto-\nTf\n\u00C2\u00A9\"\nto\n\u00C2\u00A9 t-C\nO Tf 00 oo\nso\nor-\u00C2\u00A9\n\u00C2\u00A9 CO rt O\no cn r-\nm r- in so\ntn m ct\nTf OS t\u00E2\u0080\u0094 CO\nCN \0 CT\nrH in OS CA\nOs\nSO 00\nT4 CA\nTf\nto-\nCN\n*_t\n\u00C2\u00A9 cn in\nO m m \u00C2\u00A9\nTf\nCN CO ?N\n\u00C2\u00ABn r- cN rn\no\nso co CT\nSO SO 00 Os\nOs\nCN CO rt\nrH VD CO t--\nso\neos^-\n(^\nto-\nTf\nOS\nto-\ni\n\u00C2\u00ABfl\n1\nQ\n'\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A05\nt.\n-H\n0\n3\nXi\n2\n*s\n\"in\nt3\nC\nrt\ns\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2o\n-ac\n*^\n13\nu\nin vc\n00 oc\nCO\nr-\nE\n9\npo\nE\nDC\nil\nO 3\n F 34\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nvo\nvo\nOS\nP.\n<\npq\nPi\n<\nP\nZ\npq\n*\npq\npq\np\nZ\npq\n>\npq\nPi\n6S\ns \u00C2\u00AB\n!_ ai\n.3 O\n&>\n_3\u00C2\u00AB\n_3 \u00C2\u00A7\n9 >\n__^ M--\nS|||\nJ- B-rtG.\n_\u00C2\u00AB3 a\n3.5-B\n\u00C2\u00B0 ___!'\u00C2\u00A3\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0sal\ngo\no\n__\n3\nso in oo\n\u00C2\u00A9 in Tf\nO Tf CO\nmm^r-ininr^inr-CTcoTfocomTtr-coosr-rHmcovorHTtTtsocNrHcsinooTf.\n\u00C2\u00A9r--lnTtSOCTiOOCOrtVOOCOCOCSTtOOrHrtOOrHobCSCOCT.CT\OOCTOrtrHSOOOTtcO\u00C2\u00BBnl\nv\u00C2\u00B0.rN.\u00C2\u00B0l.tlr^r*).ri.a-r^rH, * t^,viv':i0l,>.oi,oi.V\u00C2\u00A3iriln ^ \" \"^ oswesj'TTrti.'TtcsTtcooo vq *\nrirtoir^cot^\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9\"co\"cs'CTCCT\"\u00C2\u00BBnTfincoQsOrt\nC^CTCTrtlnCOCSCNC^COTtCOr^OCSC^\u00C2\u00A9COCOSOrHOmvOCSTtrHSOrtlnSOSOSOincO<\nt--omsoTtrtSOcoirt\u00C2\u00A9cocor^CTir-covosDOcoinTtCTit--osCTiOscoTtinininOrH(\u00E2\u0080\u0094 \u00E2\u0080\u00A2\n0.t_r-U\rti*tc_ur^CN\nhOW.SO't rH SO CO\nri ri\"\ncoririocsvc?\u00C2\u00A9co.\nTt so CN\ncs \u00C2\u00BBn oo\n(N rt CO\no\\n_<\n: co\nI\n\u00C2\u00A9\n\u00C2\u00A9 rt\nin\no\ntn r-\nCS \u00C2\u00A9 rt\n>n Os CN\n\u00C2\u00A9 CO rt\nco riri\nTf ct. :\nTt\ni \u00C2\u00A9 o :\n! VO\nm r- :\nOO\nco cS |\n1\nSO\n1\n\u00C2\u00A9 Os\n\u00C2\u00BBn os\ncs \u00C2\u00A9\nt> cs\nto-\nm co\nCO OS\nCO CO !\nCA SO\nt> 00\nso r-\nso\n: o\nOs CT.\nrt CS\nCO\nm co os r- co os so\nSO trtTtCOOOCNf-Tt\no r-^ r^ cs^ co vq Tt\nCO in in ri CO Tf ri\nrt CS rt CS CO\nco oo CT\ \u00C2\u00A9\nco o rt in\nrt o in c^\nOCTsr^CTinrtc^OCTfOrtTrtOst^cSrtt^inininirtSoossoricNcocosoTtinrtoot^rHcocor^rH\nC^COCSTfcOt^rt|^OinTfOOVDCOCOTf\u00C2\u00A9CT\lnTfr^CSCTiTtCTOOrHlncoOV\u00C2\u00A9TfOOOCOrtOCT\Tt\n0'/iC\n^-^cSOincorni^rtO\rth_~'orviotNOrt^if\ov5r-^\u00C2\u00AB^co^^Oiroor-^C-\nso \u00C2\u00AB \u00E2\u0096\u00A0* >o ro in r-\" oC n ts ^ n m\" rl m* m co C\' t~-* so* in ^\" \"O n* m in\ncSTtcNrtco rn vo ininrtrtcScSTfrtf^sortcSr^<\u00C2\u00BBcoc--\u00C2\u00A9TrcoinTtTi't---co \u00E2\u0080\u0094< oq Tf co\n\u00C2\u00AB*\nnTft^Noo>invOMMinc.vooovo's|(SNroo,>H\nTfrr)cOVor-O0t--r\u00E2\u0080\u0094 f^^V, ICNlTtCSTtln^CSTtC^rv.CVlln^SOlnTtr^SOTtTfi^Oi^CSrNCOCO'Tf\ncn O so *r^ so t-^ c*^ K ; co in t> u-i o t-^ so Tt n> c\u00C2\u00AB in oo s> Tf vq >-h ih k k sq so os, cs 1 V\ni! oi\nU \" o\n0 rt -\n4) t. 00\n_-< 3\ngS30S\n5e3_-_._.OBSo__'_^3\u00C2\u00BB_SB_3 8\nca Q\na n s ja o >,\n_, *_ .*\u00C2\u00BB\nuii.H^w^rt^_i^'C-\u00C2\u00BB(_iatHn-b-_i.^,I-'rt3_--;rt__3\nliOM?ZwUM-,mM^a--(-_S(i.U<.JinP\u00C2\u00AB>Z\u00C2\u00AB\nricscoTtr-odo\"\u00C2\u00A9'\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nF 35\nrtcoro(NrtCTTi-r-CT.CT.(NO\u00C2\u00A9cort\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9coTtineSTteovoroo. \u00C2\u00A9csr-r-cNooo\u00C2\u00A9r-o\u00C2\u00A9CTSD\nNNrovONinvOrtin^vOvOOrocov.oONP-rTinNininifrootsi/.oooDO.inninvirth\n*** +* *\u00C2\u00B0 *\"! \"*\" w*1 Pcri \"^ *\"\"\u00E2\u0096\u00A0 ** ** \u00C2\u00B0\ \u00C2\u00B0\u00C2\u00B0'c. \"\"> \u00C2\u00A9 (** fN m oo in co so cn Tt o co \u00C2\u00A9somTtsomsoTtmsom\nr^r^\u00C2\u00A9inoo\"socortTtTtt^riso\u00C2\u00A9\"sor-*cociciin\u00C2\u00A9rtrt\neor~r-fNrtr^inCTinosinTfrtSOcN-^irt\u00C2\u00A9co\u00C2\u00A9cN_^cSTfcoTtsOTfocococoTt\OasTfTfovco\nTfrtcosqrOTfc-jsOTt ininMt^rtqint^r^ot^oorfsOOvr.C-OOrtrooc.'tv.rotoinrort\nCN* t-^ CT* Tf rt\" CS* ri ri ri ri Tf\" fi CS CO* ri ri fi ri Tf\" CO CS (i ri ri\nr- in rt CO OS\nt\u00E2\u0080\u0094 rn m cs co\nTt rn C-^in Tf\n\u00C2\u00A9* rf oo r-\" ci\nrt CS SO o 00\nTf co rs m r-i\nr- Tt co\nCO 00 \u00C2\u00A9\nTt so m\n1\nOs\ntn\nin\n| | !\ni i i\no\nCN\n! 00\nTt\nSO\nCN\n1\nTf\nOS CS \u00E2\u0080\u0094\nr~ rt m\ntnso \u00C2\u00A9\n! co r-\n! CN t>\n: t- SO\nr- to rut\n! CS Tf 00 00\nCO CS \u00C2\u00A9 SO\nCTSOrtcOCSCSCSCSSO\ncomTtomosrHTtm\nTtCTr-moocososoin\nCO \u00C2\u00A9 OS\nVO 00 rt\nin co oo\noo\no\\nTf \u00C2\u00A9\nm co\nO 00\n: Tf o\noo\nr- \u00C2\u00A9\nCO cs\nOs Os\nCN\no\u00C2\u00A9socoTtsDTfOrtCOcNincor-(Nincoooinr-inTt\u00C2\u00A9cscNi-Ht^so\nMCT^Ttrtcsc^in^^sosoTfTCinrsrs\u00C2\u00A9Tfininr^_t: \u00E2\u0080\u0094\n> O eo \u00C2\u00A9 CN Tf in cN .\nr^\u00C2\u00A9^\u00C2\u00A9^CTssqrtcortinooTtos\u00C2\u00A9^sqTfTtrHrtSoHinoinTt CTcocNrt\u00C2\u00A9TtrHcs\u00C2\u00BBnCTas66inTtrt ro r- oo ct. co\nO VO COinrtCNrH t\u00E2\u0080\u0094 rt r- COCT OSCS 0\* CO* rf fi m\" SO* r-\" (_s cN* rf* \o\" OO* OO rf rf* O* ro rf* so\" O* K IO* (_S* h\" SO* rl CO* rt m* ro*\nrortinmcSTfvomvo Trt^rHc^rtOrtooor-cortrtcOrtcoinrtcNoor-co rHrt toror. r- co cn\n!o in h to h r\| rs O \u00C2\u00AB\nTj-Ttrnvocsso'-tin'Tf\nsor-Ttsocoootxcs\nrtHH ^4 rt t4 t4 rt rt rt t4 t4 rt rt r-t t4\n^^-P^^^^^^TtcohsSo^cw^tvino^sosoint^h^cot^^C-i\nTh^^OCTOOcot^CNCT\u00C2\u00A9hs.TfKrOCN.oor^\"nOcosocNCS,r}.tv-TfTtO\\n*\u00E2\u0080\u009E \^, ^OsNinrON^VOftrtVOin^VO^fNNr-CisOCOrriCOOO cr,\nCo co co t-\"ri rfcirfsoro\" \"rf in oi s\u00C2\u00A9 fi fi* \u00C2\u00A9 ci ri ri <-i f* \"i\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094 >-i np. N \u00E2\u0080\u00A2\u00E2\u0080\u0094I CN \"-i CS\nCS VO OS\nm rr os\nCS CO Tf\n;\nrH CO CO CTS t*\u00C2\u00BB\nOS \u00C2\u00A9 CO t~^ rH\nrH \o Tf oo rs\n\u00C2\u00ABn cs\" r* rf oo\nCN ro cN rs co\nTf \u00C2\u00A9 rt rf co\nCA f-* OS* Tf ri\nCTinOrtCT\incocs\u00C2\u00A9incoo\cSTtcsr^\u00C2\u00BBninCTcococNcor-CTcoTtrsococoror-ir--t--cN--inr--\nt^oor^CTOsoor^insot^oor^inrtCTsrHOssoso'rfinr^cNinint^cocNsor-iooooCT.CT-inocovo\no\co^qr^N qrt^MNqrf toinoosor|co osroson-moo qOn asoso>nrt n r-t~^o t~-cosoo\no n* ^* K ^ ri r\" to\" o rf o h ci so\" ri in\" ro\" r^\" r<* ov m* co* r* rf m\" m\" rir^osaiooooCTsofN\u00C2\u00A9\"os\u00C2\u00A9rioor-\".-\nr- r- eo cs \u00C2\u00A9 t\u00E2\u0080\u0094 cooscNinTfr-so(N(Nsorsco\u00C2\u00A9ooinoorsin\ncqcqcortinrH Tt os cq oo co in Os_ oo os^ t* Tf o ro\ncr\"soci\u00C2\u00A9\"os\u00C2\u00A9rtCo\"t^iiosCT\"'Tft^cico\"ciTfosrssovoso\nHOsSOSDOOrt\u00C2\u00A9CNO\OSCTCSCS\"noocOO\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0_cs\u00C2\u00A9ooin(NcNrtrtrSrH rocsr-sort\nCN. ro\nCO ro\nCO Tf\nCO VO\nTt CO\nso_^rtCTcosDCTcNrs\u00C2\u00A9TtCTinsof^c\u00C2\u00BB-^fOoortootnoor--Ttoor^tNins^\nsoCTif^cot^cssoCTci-iCT-^r^i^rt-rt^TrCTTtsoininrtinoosor^CTincNtocortrtcocssDONCT\nrosqfSsqrfrtco\u00C2\u00A9inrfvqcq\u00C2\u00A9CTt^Troor^OOcOrtooroinrtrHrorfino\no \u00C2\u00AB\u00E2\u0080\u0094 o ctct r- so rs eo \u00E2\u0080\u0094i in\"\u00E2\u0080\u0094 Tfco'oocivOrtTfin\u00C2\u00A9\u00C2\u00A9 as so co\" rt r. \" rl r-* m\" so r-' so\" t-* in ov\" \u00E2\u0080\u0094\" ri o\" rt c\nn-insoTtooo\\u00C2\u00A9\"noincooorMC)^om'\u00E2\u0080\u0094'COcsocs\u00C2\u00A9csin^DOco\u00C2\u00A9coincST_-inrrcscssooocoCTTt-i\nSDinC. SD CS CNOsmrfvC!^-fNTfSOf~-r~-00 OO inCTiCOSOcNrtSOCSCOCSrtCNrH CN OO\nTS rn\n2-g'\n\"\"3-3\n_. &tt\nI*\nCO _C\nCJ ~ CO \u00E2\u0080\u0094 _ _\na ., tj c 3 o u\ncl> 4* O 5. -i-: r_\ni^fojg\n3 S .3\noSS\n__ Z o\n_. L. O\n4> V \u00E2\u0080\u00A2_\u00C2\u00AB\nJSJ5>\nU w \u00E2\u0096\u00A0_-\nrt __\n--, 3 _!\nP __ \u00E2\u0080\u00A2\u00C2\u00A3\nii&\n__ 5 3\n_- O rt\nN o\n\u00C2\u00AB s \u00C2\u00A7\nw rt fc\n$Si_\nII\n.5 t. -a\n2 9 9\n_.__.___.\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2S n k \u00E2\u0080\u00A2_\n\u00E2\u0080\u009E. S > > '\n\"S O fi 3 fl\nZ O MO O \u00C2\u00A7 g\nCat; b b \u00C2\u00A35\nSqu___c w .\u00C2\u00AB o J. O rtrt t^-rt\n F 36\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nm O CO \u00C2\u00A9\nrt t-i t- VO\nCO\n\u00C2\u00ABn \u00C2\u00A9 \u00C2\u00A9 r^\nCO\n*c3\nTf rf rf ci\nso\nco 00 os r-\nin\no\ntO- CN rt CO\nH\nrf\nCS\ntH\nSg\nSO\nTf\n2>h\nsq\n\"\u00C2\u00AB\u00C2\u00ABi\nin\n.-a 3\n0 0\n00\nTf\nts\nIi\nH\npa\nu\npq\n\u00C2\u00A7\nrt\nD\nZ\n6*1\nCj\nZ\nG\nK\npq\nrt\n-H\n>\n-D\nq\npq\n\u00C2\u00A7\n\"3\nk.\n2\n3\nz\nt-t\n\"-H\n3\n1\nCf\nX\nV\n>\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\na\nQ\ng\n*rt\n0\n0\ntJ\nA\n1\nrt\n_=_\n0\nB\nc\nrt\ns\nO\nco\nT\n*4\n'to\nH\ntc\n11\nu 0\na\nCQ\nU\nP\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nF 37\nIN RETROSPECT\nThe school-year 1966/67 was in all respects a Centennial celebration, celebrating as it did both the hundredth anniversary of the Confederation of Canada\nand the hundredth anniversary of the union of British Columbia and Vancouver\nIsland. Activities for the Centenary Year were co-ordinated by an educational\nsub-committee of the British Columbia Centennial Committee under the chairmanship of Dr. J. F. K. English, retired Deputy Minister. They were so numerous and\nvaried, entering into all phases of educational life in this Province, that I have\nrequested that a special report, Centenary in the Schools, be prepared by Mr. B. A.\nBarr, secretary of the sub-committee, and appended to this Report.\nAccomplishments by branches of the Department, by individual schools, or\nby individual pupils are not always brought to public attention. It therefore follows\nthat some outstanding achievements well worthy of recording are omitted from this\nReport. The following, however, should be mentioned.\nThe Kootenay School of Art, a division of the Vocational School at Nelson,\nwon a silver medal in international competition for its entry of 22 ceramic works in\nthe International Exhibition of Ceramic Arts at Faenza, Italy, in 1966. Mrs. Sara\nGolling, of Nelson, won a third prize of 25,000 lira. Next summer the school\nrepeated its achievement with another silver medal, individual honours going to\nMiss Lydia Pingwatuk, who also won a third prize.\nA team of four students from the Nanaimo Vocational School entered the Canadian Centennial Culinary Competition held in the Royal York Hotel, Toronto, and\nwon a trophy for the best creation in the student classification, an honour never\nbefore won outside of Ontario. David Kein, of the school, won an award for individual food creation.\nThe services of Mr. J. R. Pollock, Director of Visual Education, were requested\nthrough UNESCO by the Sheikdom of Kuwait to review progress in audio-visual\neducation in that country. Mr. Pollock had in 1962 prepared recommendations for\nthe organization of audio-visual activities in Kuwait, and the letter requesting his\nreturn stated \"his work was greatly appreciated by the Kuwait authorities, and\nbecause of the success of the mission they have asked that he be requested to return\nfor one month.\" Mr. Pollock was granted leave of absence for that purpose in the\nspring of 1967.\nThe Division of School Broadcasts won an international award from the Institute for Education by Radio-Television, Ohio State University, for the best educational television programme in the natural and physical sciences. This is the latest\nin a series of similar awards won previously by the Division for outstanding work in\nschool broadcasts.\nDepartmental congratulations go to the elementary schools of School District\nNo. 14 (Southern Okanagan) for winning third prize in the Encyclopaedia Britan-\nnica Canadian School Library Awards. This award is given to the school district\nwhich, \" with due consideration of resources, shows the greatest measure of growth\nand progress toward the goal of good library service in the elementary schools.\"\nOne of the least heralded and most spectacular accomplishments by an individual was the winning by Russell Wodell, a student in Mount Baker Secondary\nSchool at Cranbrook, of the $25,000 Lions International World Essay Contest.\nMr. Woden's essay on means of attaining world peace had to stand the test of competition in successive district, regional, national, and world eliminations, a matter\nof great credit to him as an individual and to the teachers who instructed him in\nEnglish and in social studies.\n F 38\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nIn educational circles today it is common to speak of \" innovation.\" Experimentation and innovation are usually the signs of an educational system that is alive\nand functioning, and there is no reason to believe otherwise of British Columbia\nschools today. Those changes which are system-wide, such as the \" discovery \"\napproach to learning and the \" levels system \" in the language arts, are mentioned\nin the reports of the various branches and divisions or are inherent in curriculum\nbulletins issued by the Department. Those which occur in individual districts and\nschools are not so mentioned.\nA reading of the annual reports of the various District Superintendents of\nSchools clearly indicates that most districts and many schools are keenly aware of\nchanges in educational methods and philosophies.\nThe impact of the new curricula is apparent at all grade levels and has aroused\nfurther changes in individual schools. A number of districts have established resource centres where books, records, pictures, slides, and other teaching aids are\navailable for the assistance of teachers. Some districts are following the lead of\nKamloops in establishing closed-circuit television. Although the use originally\nconceived was that of broadcasting lessons taught by certain teachers, and therefore\nextending the use of these teachers to more pupils, it is apparently being used more\nand more as an enriching device to broadcast as needed videotapes of previously\nproduced programmes, whatever their source.\nStrictly in the curriculum field, some districts are trying out major-work classes\nfor brighter pupils and are introducing non-prescribed subjects on a selected basis\nto elementary schools. Oral French is one of these, as is instrumental music. A new\napproach to science at lower grade levels, whereby the students are encouraged to\ndiscover principles through experimentation, will probably be a feature of later\ncurricula. Meanwhile, use is being made in many schools of these newer techniques.\nClosely allied to the curricula themselves are changes in organization and in\nteaching methods. Some teachers have found the initial teaching alphabet (i.t.a.\nfor short) a more effective method of introducing beginners to the written word in\nour complex language. It is being used in a growing number of areas. Continuous\nprogress, advocated by the Department as early as 1946 as an ideal method of\nschool organization, is being used increasingly in the elementary schools. Team\nteaching is another device used at all levels, while seminars are becoming much more\ncommon in senior secondary grades.\nTo use new methods requires new types of building and equipment. A number of the more recent elementary schools have been built on the \" open area \"\nplan, where large open teaching spaces make for flexible use of the area by several\nclasses and several teachers at once. This type of school is dependent upon organized team teaching for effective use. Some of the later secondary schools are also\nquite different than the traditional schools in that they have rooms planned for various sizes and types of class. One of them has demountable walls, so that future\nchanges in needs will involve the least possible expense of remodelling.\nAdministrative methods are also changing. More school districts are developing their own types of report card. Others are using special modular time-tables,\nmaking it possible to vary the length of any period. Data-processing techniques\nare taking over pupil accounting in many instances, especially in time scheduling.\nFinally, a number of school districts are recruiting para-professional personnel\nfor a variety of duties traditionally carried out by teachers, with the expressed purpose of relieving teachers for more professional duties. Among these new assistants\nto the teaching process we find the following mentioned: Essay markers in the field\nof English, laboratory technicians who both repair and build equipment as well as\nsetting up experiments, laboratory assistants, playground supervisors, office man-\n REPORT OF SUPERINTENDENT\nF 39\nagers, and teacher aides who carry out actual non-teaching duties in the classroom.\nIn no case have these employees apparently reduced the number of teachers necessary, but they have relieved the teachers of time-consuming tasks and hopefully freed\nthem for greater attention to preparation and classroom work.\nAnother pleasing feature in reports of District Superintendents from those areas\nwhere a native Indian population exists in relatively large numbers is the obvious\ninterest of School Boards in assisting them to take a full part in the life of the district. Report after report mentions measures to increase pupil attendance in the\nschools, to encourage attendance to higher grade levels, to prepare children for\nentry by the establishment of kindergartens, and to provide classes at the adult level.\nThis in most cases is done with the co-operation of local officials of the Indian\nBranch of the relevant Federal department.\nSENIOR STAFF CHANGES\nAt the end of the school-year, Mr. W. D. Reid was appointed to the position\nof Assistant Superintendent of Education (University and College Affairs). This\nposition, necessitated by the growing activity in the field of post-secondary education, had been occupied on a temporary basis by Dr. J. D. Chapman, of the University of British Columbia. Dr. Chapman, working on a part-time basis, had effectively launched the affairs of the new branch. Mr. Reid was, until the time of his\nappointment, Chief Inspector of Schools. He had previously served education as a\nteacher, a principal, and a District Superintendent of Schools, after distinguished\nmilitary service with the Seaforth Highlanders.\nThe position of Chief Inspector of Schools vacated by Mr. Reid was filled by\nthe appointment of Mr. R. B. Stibbs, a retiring District Superintendent of Schools,\nin an acting capacity for a period of one year. Mr. Stibbs, who would normally\nhave retired as of lune 30, 1967, served the Province as a teacher and as a principal\nfor many years before becoming an Inspector of Schools in 1945 in Prince George\nand Salmon Arm. More recently he has been District Superintendent of Schools\nin the growing school district of Coquitlam. Mr. Stibbs was at one time president\nof the British Columbia Teachers' Federation.\nMr. J. L. Canty, District Superintendent of Schools for School District No. 59\n(Peace River South), was appointed to the position of Co-ordinator of Services,\nvacated by the promotion of Mr. J. Phillipson. Before serving as a District Superintendent in Northern British Columbia, Mr. Canty was principal of the North\nDelta Secondary School.\nA long career in the service of the Department came to a close when Col. C. J.\nStrong retired as Inspector of Vocational and Technical Education. Colonel Strong\nhad a distinguished military career during the Second World War. Previous to that\ntime he taught in the secondary schools in Vancouver, and upon his retirement from\nthe Canadian Army was appointed Inspector of Technical Classes with the Department on July 1, 1946. Colonel Strong held B.A. and M.A. degrees as well as certificates in the field of technical training.\nEven longer service with the Department was rendered by Dr. Charles E.\nMacDonald, who retired as Superintendent of the Jericho Hill School for the Blind\nand the Deaf. Dr. MacDonald had an outstanding career in the field of special\neducation. A graduate of Blackstone and of Rutgers, he received an honourary\nLL.D. degree in recognition of his services in 1943. He came to Jericho Hill School\nas principal in 1935, and was honoured many times throughout the years by associations concerned with the education of the deaf and of the blind. His devoted\nservice to the children of this Province will long be remembered.\n F 40 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nDr. MacDonald has been succeeded as superintendent and as principal of the\nSchool for the Deaf by Mr. Peter Freemantle, a former vice-principal. A native of\nCornwall, Mr. Freemantle joined the staff at Jericho Hill School after taking teacher-\ntraining in England and attending the National College of Teachers of the Deaf.\nBetween 1961 and 1966 he served as Assistant Superintendent and Superintendent\nof Schools for the Deaf in Nova Scotia and Ontario.\nMrs. D. Corrigan has been appointed as principal of the School for the Blind.\nThe first principal of the British Columbia Institute of Technology, opened\nin 1964, was Mr. E. Cecil Roper, who retired at the end of the 1966/67 school-\nyear. Mr. Roper was born in Saskatchewan and graduated in mining engineering\nfrom the University of Alberta. He rose from the position of miner to that of president of the Howe Sound Mining Company. He later served as a teacher in the\nFaculty of Commerce and was appointed to the principalship of the institute in\n1962, a year and a half before it opened. His leadership in planning the institute\nand piloting it through the beginning years is gratefully acknowledged.\nMr. Roper was succeeded in 1967 by Mr. Dean H. Goard, formerly assistant\ndirector of adult education for the Vancouver School Board. Mr. Goard is a graduate in chemistry from the University of British Columbia and has had a distinguished\ncareer in industry and in education. He spent nine years with the Vancouver Engineering Works Ltd. and the Federal Department of Fisheries before joining the\nstaff of the Vancouver Technical School. He later became principal of the Vancouver Vocational Institute, a position he held for 12 years.\nAnother retiring official of the Department was Cecil Edward Ritchie, who, at\nthe time of his retirement, was District Superintendent of Schools for School District No. 71 (Courtenay). He joined the Department as an Inspector of Schools\nin 1955 after a long career in teaching and 15 years as principal of the high school\nat Oliver. In 1958 he was transferred to Oliver, where he became District Superintendent of Schools.\nWelcomed to the staff of District Superintendents of Schools are Mr. A. C.\nRutledge, formerly supervisor of secondary instruction for School District No. 33\n(Chilliwack); Mr. W. L. B. Hawker, formerly principal of the Dr. Knox Secondary\nSchool in Kelowna; and Mr. A. P. MacKay, formerly principal of the Kamloops\nSenior Secondary School.\nACKNOWLEDGMENTS\nI should like to take this opportunity of thanking all my colleagues, who worked\nso diligently in their various fields, and the teachers in the schools, upon whose\nefforts the success of education in British Columbia rests.\nI have the honour to be,\nSir,\nYour obedient servant,\nF. P. LEVIRS,\nSuperintendent of Education.\n CENTENARY IN THE SCHOOLS\nF 41\nCENTENARY IN THE SCHOOLS\nREPORT ON EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA\nDURING THE CENTENNIAL SCHOOL-YEAR\nBy Bruce A. Barr, B.A.*\nThe significance of both the Provincial and the National events has been presented in numerous ways to all those of school age.\nThe Curriculum Division produced a very fine teaching programme (173\npages) which provided rich resources as well as teaching outlines at primary, intermediate, and secondary levels. This material was well supported by School Broadcasts, which produced special series on both radio and television giving comprehensive coverage of Centennial subjects. Further aids such as films and filmstrips were\nprovided by the Visual Education Division.\nThe Centennial theme dominated Province-wide art projects and competitions\nin music, drama, and year books. A special project for Indian children elicited a\ntotal of 651 entries consisting of written work, painting, and handicrafts which were\njudged, and prizes were awarded. For elementary grades a historical pageant was\nprepared in five scenes, together with production notes, music, and other resources.\nThis was produced in 35 places throughout the Province and was well received.\nDouglas Day, 1966, was marked by special half-hour radio broadcasts, one\nelementary and one secondary. For the latter a special script was commissioned.\nSuggestions were given for producing a further half-hour programme locally, and a\ncommemorative brochure was provided for each student.\nThe Correspondence Branch produced special courses emphasizing Canada\nand British Columbia from the point of view of fostering good citizenship. Adult\neducation received attention in a 90-minute film and special courses and lectures\noffered by universities.\nProbably the most imaginative undertaking of all has offered all those of school\nage in the Province an opportunity to do something for others. They are all invited\nto contribute to Project 100, which aims to provide mobile educational resource\nunits for developing Commonwealth countries. The first unit is to be sent to Guyana\nafter touring part of the Province.\nAnother project whose value potential is very high is the Youth Travel Programme. The programme, sponsored by the Province, in which Grade X students\nexchange for a week, has this year involved 163 schools and 567 students. The\nNational programme has given even more British Columbia students a chance to\nsee much of their country and interact with their counterparts in distant areas.\nOther National projects have involved our school-age population. Many have\nseen the exhibits in the Confederation Train and Caravans. A vast number have\nparticipated in the Athletic Programme, in which those who reached National standards received crests. At many schools the National tree-planting project was carried out, and all students have received Centennial medallions.\n* Secretary, Educational Activities Sub-committee, Canadian Confederation of the Centennial Committee of\nBritish Columbia.\n F 42\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nADMINISTRATION BRANCH\nREPORT OF J. PHILLIPSON, B.A., B.Ed., ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT\nOF EDUCATION (ADMINISTRATION AND SCHOOL BOARD RELATIONS).\nIntroduction\nThe year is highlighted by a number of significant developments affecting the\nadministration of the Department. A major phase of school construction carried\nout under the Federal-Provincial Vocational Programme has been completed. Over\n$30,000,000 worth of construction and renovation, together with the provision of\nequipment, has had a dramatic effect in providing facilities for students having a\nvocational inclination.\nThe year has also been one of major accomplishment throughout the Province,\ninasmuch as school construction reached an all-time high of $42,000,000.\nThis report will also include the \" Special Services \" information.\nSchool District Organization\nMunicipal school districts\nRural school districts\t\nUnattached school districts\nTotal\t\nSchool Board Organization\nFive-member Board __\nSeven-member Board\nNine-member Board __\nOfficial trustees (number of districts)\nTotal\t\nCapital Expenditures (Section 190 Approvals),\nCalendar Year 1966\n75\n8\n4\n87\n24\n37\n18\n8\n87\nSite purchase and improvement\nBuildings\u00E2\u0080\u0094construction \t\nEquipment\nPlans and supervision\nTotal\t\nReferenda\nApproved by Department\t\nApproved by owner-electors\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n(a) Shareable\t\n(b) Non-shareable \t\n$3,193,044\n41,070,023\n7,639,243\n2,046,975\n$53,949,285\n$73,288,331\n62,350,919\n429,908\nTotal\n$62,780,827\nSuccessful referenda\t\nUnsuccessful referenda\nSchool\nDistricts\n___ 32\n._- 17\nTotal\nReferenda\n41\n20\nTotals\n49\n61\n ADMINISTRATION BRANCH\nF 43\nThe Work of the School Planning Division\nThe members of the School Planning Division have devoted the major portion\nof their time to the evaluation and the approval of plans and specifications, sites\nand site improvements submitted by the various School Boards. These evaluations\nand approvals have not only embraced the $41,070,023 required for the work on\nthe regular public-school projects financed under referenda, but in addition have\nevaluated approximately $9,000,000 of projects financed under the Vocational\nSchools Assistance Act (Programme 1).\nIn addition to the above-mentioned work, the members of the School Planning\nDivision have prepared plans and specifications and have supervised the construction of 17 projects, amounting to $1,119,700, during the past school-year.\nTutorial Assistance for Pupils in Isolated Areas\nThe establishment of classes for pupils living in isolated areas is authorized\nwhere neither school accommodation nor transportation is available. All pupils in\nsuch classes must be assembled in suitable quarters during the regular school-hours,\nand they must be tutored by an instructor sanctioned by the Superintendent of\nEducation.\nDuring the past school-year there were 16 classes of this nature in operation.\nThese classes enrolled a total of 72 pupils, of which 58 were elementary pupils and\n14 were secondary pupils. These classes were operated in conjunction with the\nCorrespondence Branch of the Department and were authorized under the provisions of section 20 of the Public Schools Act. Under this section, salary aid, in the\nform of a grant to the teacher, is paid directly by the Province. Such a grant is normally $15 per pupil per month of instruction.\nConclusion\nThe year has, from a personal point of view, been a very interesting one.\nDr. W. A. Plenderleith, my predecessor, left the Administrative Branch in good\norder. I am extremely thankful for the direction he gave to me and the rich experience I gained under his most capable leadership.\nIn my daily routine I am constantly impressed with the excellent relationships\nwhich exist between the Department of Education and the School Board members\nand education officials wherever one may travel. It is, without a doubt, a good\ntime to be associated with the education growth of the Province.\nSPECIAL SERVICES\nConveyance of School-children\nThe following statistics indicate details connected with the conveyance\nschool-children during the school-year 1966/67:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nItem 1966/67\n1. Number of large school districts providing transportation 75\n2. Number of unattached districts providing transportation 1\n3. Total number of vehicles 689\n(a) District-owned 488\n(b) Contract 201\n(c) Other (water taxis, etc.) 4\n4. Total daily approved mileage (miles) 42,933\n(a) Average distance per vehicle (miles) 62.3\n(b) Average number of trips per vehicle 2.0\nof\n F 44\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\n7.\nTotal number of daily trips by all vehicles 1,363\nAverage distance per single trip (miles) 15.7\nTotal number of pupils carried daily 60,824\n(a) Elementary 29,490\n(_.) Secondary 31,334\nAverage number of pupils carried per vehicle 88.3\nAverage number of pupils carried per route 44.1\nTransportation Assistance\nDuring the school-year 1966/67, 2,197 pupils from 66 districts utilized transportation assistance as a means of conveyance at a total cost of $398,192.\nTable of Transportation Costs\nThe following table indicates the relationship between the total district expenditure and the total conveyance costs over the past 11 years:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nCalendar Year\nTotal District\nExpenditures\nConveyance\nCosts\nConveyance\nCosts as a\nPercentage\nof District\nExpenditures\n1956..\n1957-\n1958..\n1959..\nI960..\n1961..\n1962.\n1963..\n1964..\n1965..\n1966..\n80\n91\n105\n118.\n127.\n136\n150.\n165,\n185.\n214,\n234,423\n966,873\n279,662\n,044,901\n269,991\n616,486\n432,687\n790,702\n814,555\n566,119\n156,353\n$1,918,902\n2,104,443\n2,236,918\n2,340,813\n2,477,202\n2,611,370\n2,721,510\n2,886,696\n3,125,447\n3,475,895\n4,009,393\n2.8\n2.5\n2.4\n2.2\n2.1\n2.0\n2.0\n1.9\n1.9\n1.9\n1.9\nSummary of School Dormitory Data, 1966/67\nSchool District\nCapacity\nOccupancy\nStaff\nGrade Limits\nAccommodated\nNumber and Name\nBoys\nGirls\nBoys\nGirls\nFull\nTime\nPart\nTime\nFrom\nTo\n24. Kamloops\t\n27. Williams Lake\t\n15\n17\n30\n20\n20\n16\n16\n66\n12\n14\n20\n30\n20\n20\n16\n16\n55\n12\n15\n17\n16\n22\n10\n10\n54\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n14\n13\n16\n16\n5\n5\n55\n1\n2\n2\n2\n3\n\"\"2\n2 '\n6\n2\n1\n1\n1\nz\n....\n2\n1\n10\n8\n8\n13\n12\n100 Mile House\n12\n10 12\n28. Quesneli \t\n29. Lillooet\u00E2\u0080\u0094\t\n.... | ....\n8 12\n56. Vanderhoof2 \t\n8 | 123\n58. McBride- \t\n8 1 12\n59. Peace River South*\t\n8\n8\n12\n64. Gulf Islands \t\n12\nTotals.. \t\n224 '\n222\n156\n141\n23\n7\n8\n13\n1 Not used as dormitory in 1966.\n2 Not operated since June, 1964.\n3 Plus occupational.\n* Dormitory closed June, 1966.\n ADMINISTRATION BRANCH\nF 45\nBoarding Allowances\nFor pupils who are unable to take advantage of transportation or dormitory\nfacilities, the School Board is empowered to provide a boarding allowance. Under\nthis arrangement a pupil can receive up to $40 a month on a basis shared by the\nDepartment of Education. During the past school-year, 1966/67, there were 745\npupils from 51 school districts who received a total of $296,200 in such boarding\nallowances.\nSchool Board Services\nThe Department has been able, on request, to offer consultative service to a\nnumber of School Boards during the past year. Members of the staff are pleased\nto render such assistance when called upon to do so.\n F 46 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nINSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES\nREPORT OF J. R. MEREDITH, B.A., B.Ed., M.Ed., ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION (INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES)\nThis office is responsible for instructional services provided to schools, including those pertaining to curriculum development, textbooks, tests and standards,\nvisual aids, and school broadcasts. Certain of these services are administered by\nspecial divisions in the Department headed by a director who submits an annual\nreport for the division. Other matters related to the instructional programme but\nnot coming directly within the scope of these divisions are included in the following report.\nAccreditation of Schools\nUnder the general supervision of the Board of Examiners, the Accrediting\nCommittee is responsible for assessing applications from public schools offering\nGrade XII courses who may be eligible to receive authority to recommend the granting of Department of Education graduation to a proportion of Grade XII students\nwithout necessity of their writing Department of Education examinations. Under\nthese procedures, an accredited school is one which, for a specified period of years,\nmay recommend candidates for graduation on the Academic and Technical Programme.\nThe number of schools considered this year was reduced from previous years\nbecause of the consolidation of the Grades XI and XII curriculum in fewer schools.\nA total of 14 schools previously enrolling small numbers of Grades XI and XII\nstudents have now become junior secondary schools. These schools are found in\nDistricts Nos. 8, 13, 20, 22, 29, 32, 50 (3), 51, 63, 78, and 81.\nA statistical summary follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nTotal number of schools offering Grade XII 142\nNumber of schools assessed for accreditation 67\nAccredited for one year 13\nAccredited for two years 14\nAccredited for three years 18\nAccredited for four years 2\nTotal number of schools accredited, 1966/67 47\nNumber accredited in previous years and still retaining accreditation 75\nTotal number of schools accredited as of 1966 122\nTeacher Qualifications in Secondary Schools\nThe number of teachers with elementary certification only teaching academic\nsubjects at Grade X or higher secondary levels decreased. The number who have\ntaken no courses within the last five years has decreased to 36 from 41 last year.\nOf the total of 173, 76 took at least one course in 1966. Each year a significant\nnumber of elementary teachers qualify themselves for secondary work. Efforts are\nbeing made to ensure that new appointments of elementary certificated teachers to\npositions in secondary schools are limited to those who have some hope and intention of qualifying for higher certification within a reasonable time, and who have\n INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES\nF 47\nalready demonstrated this by their attendance at summer school within the last five\nyears. Comparable figures for the past four years are shown below:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nYear\nNumber with Certificate Shown\nTotals\nE-A\nE-B\nE-C\ne-t\n1963/64\n1 1\n69 72 5\n21\n167\n1964/65\n83 | 58 4\n15\n160\n1965/66 \t\n104 I 55 I 6\n20\n185\n1966/67 _\t\n80 | 61 | 2 30\n1 1 1\n173\nChoice of Programmes, September, 1966\nIn the school-year 1966/67 the new organization of the secondary-school curriculum begun in 1962 was completed to the Grade XII level. Of the total Grades\nXI and XII enrolment, 97.1 per cent was enrolled on the new programmes and\n2.9 per cent was completing graduation under the former requirements.\nProgramme\nAcademic and Technical\t\nCommercial\t\nIndustrial\t\nCommunity Services\t\nVisual and Performing Arts\nOther new programmes\nRepeaters completing old programmes .\nPer Cent\n. 61.1\n. 19.1\n. 10.6\n. 3.9\n. 0.7\n. 1.7\n_ 2.9\nOrganization of Secondary Schools\nThe newer types of school organization providing for the reorganized curriculum are becoming established. Types are shown below:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber of Schools\nType\nSenior secondary\t\nSecondary\t\n1965\n15\n1966\n19\n100 (73)\n107 (83)\n56 (48)\n71 (67)\n45 (28)\n23 (20)\n41 (19)\n43 (27)\nJunior secondary\t\nElementary and Secondary\t\nElementary and junior secondary\t\n(The figures in parentheses show the number enrolling all grades in the category given; for example, secondary VIII to XIII, inclusive.)\nThe size of schools, with reference to secondary enrolments only, is shown\nbelow:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nEnrolment\nOver 2,000 __.\n1,001-2,000\n501-1,000\n251- 500\n101- 250\n51- 100\nUnder 51\t\nNumber of Schools\n1965 1966\n1 2\n34 33\n88 93\n55 58\n38 38\n20 16\n21 23\nTotals\n257\n263\n F 48\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nThe number of Grade VIII pupils in small elementary schools remained fairly\nconstant at 110. The total number of elementary pupils housed in secondary schools\nwas 11,583, as compared to 15,319 in 1965.\nGrade XIII Enrolments\nA significant decline in enrolments may be noted in the following figures and\nis due to the establishing of Simon Fraser University, Vancouver City College, and\nSelkirk Regional College:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n1965 1966\nNumber of districts with Grade XIII 38 32\nNumber of schools 40 34\nEnrolment 2,552 2,400\nKindergartens\nKindergartens increased in number and enrolment, as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n1965 1966\nNumber of districts with kindergartens 26 33\nNumbers of schools 182 217\nEnrolment 12,210 13,589\nSchools for Trainable Retarded Children\nThe table below shows enrolments in schools operated by local chapters of the\nAssociation for Retarded Children of British Columbia and supported by grants:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nDistricts\nSchools\nEnrolment of Pupils in Relation to Grants\nFully\nEligible\nKindergarten\nIneligible\nTotal\n1965 - \t\n1966 \t\n42\n40\n45\n43\n505\n448\n45\n51\n64\n33\n614\n532\nThere were also 673 pupils enrolled in public-school day classes in 15 school\ndistricts, making a total of 1,205 trainable retarded pupils in day schools, as compared with 1,088 in 1965.\nLocal Supervisory Personnel\nThe following table shows the number of district teachers employed in supervisory and special capacities as at September 30th:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n1965 1966\nDirectors of instruction 29 31\nSupervisors of instruction 100 105\nTeacher consultants 20 28\nSpecial counsellors 43 48\nDistrict teachers other than relieving teachers 68 81\nTotals\n260\n293\n INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES F 49\nSpecial Classes in Public Schools\nEnrolments, as reported on September 30th, are shown in the following table:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nType of Class\nNumber of Teachers\nNumber of Pupils\n1965\n1966\n1965\n1966\nSlow learners (educable retarded) \t\n293\n76\n9\n23\n9\n13\n2\n2\n2\n8\n58\n3\n8\n319\n110\n11\n35\n11\n15\n2\n2\n13\n67\n4\n8\n4,024\n1,076\n(2)\n453\n100\n405\n14\n37\n64\n66\n556\n.21\n4,362\n1,587\n(2)\n608\n121\nHospitals ... _ \t\n422\nVisually handicapped \t\n16\nPreventorium _ _\t\nDetention home \u00E2\u0080\u009E\t\n80\nEmotionally disturbed\t\n113\nMentally retarded - \t\n673\nSpeech2 \t\nf 21\nHard of hearing\n55 | 57\nTotals \t\n506\n597\n6,850 1 8,039\n1\ni Enrolment varies greatly.\n2 Not given.\nPXTTTTT CMIIWT <~IT. T\nPACTTEns:\nThe total number of teaching positions within entitlement for grant purposes\nand the number established over and above entitlement by local districts, as at\nSeptember 30th, are shown below:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n1965 1966\nTeaching positions within entitlement 15,652.96 16,616.79\nTeaching positions over entitlement 474.03 782.51\nTotals 16,126.99\n17,399.30\nDIVISION OF CURRICULUM\nReport of W. B. Naylor, B.A., Director\nThe Division of Curriculum is responsible for the development of new courses\nand the revision of prescribed courses in the curriculum, the preparation of courses\nand curriculum guides for authorization and publication, and the evaluation and\nselection of textbooks for authorization. In addition, the Division advises on the\nadministration of the curriculum and prepares administrative and other bulletins\ndealing with curriculum policy. This work is carried on with the assistance of\nadvisory committees of teachers and other experts.\nDuring the year under review, a total of 22 committees comprising 181 members held 168 meetings on curriculum-development matters. An estimated 5,300\nhours of members' time was devoted to this work. It is significant to note that the\nassistance given by members of these committees is voluntary. The policy of providing for released time for teacher members was continued.\nRevision work was continued in the following curriculum areas: Art, chemistry, English, French, German, home economics, industrial education, language\narts, mathematics, music, science, and social studies. The committee formed to\ndevelop courses for special classes for slow learners at the intermediate grade level\nprepared and issued bulletins outlining suggested procedures at this level. New\nstudies were undertaken in the fields of commerce and health education. A total\n F 50 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nof 12 new or revised courses and 71 new textbooks were prepared for use in September, 1967. In addition, a special committee was formed to investigate the implications of data processing and computing to education. Another committee was\nestablished to prepare a revised library manual for the public schools of British\nColumbia. Three special summer workshops were conducted: one to do preliminary investigation into the field of elementary health education, another to rewrite\nthe draft of the Grade IX course in the junior secondary-school science programme,\nand the third to identify suitable textual material for the Grades VIII and IX\ncourses in the proposed junior secondary-school social studies programme. The\nregular procedure for reviewing and recommending books for school libraries was\ncontinued. Approximately 550 books were reviewed and 469 were recommended,\nand four lists with annotations were issued to all schools.\nAcknowledgment\nThe help and advice received from the members of the various curriculum\ncommittees and, in particular, the two professional committees are gratefully acknowledged. The co-operation received from the British Columbia Teachers' Federation and the three public universities in the Province has been greatly appreciated by the Department of Education.\nCurriculum Consultants\nThe practice was continued whereby two outstanding teachers in the Province\nwere released on loan by the Boards of School Trustees to work with the Division\nof Curriculum. This year appointees were Mr. P. C. Glover (Victoria) and Mr.\nG. J. Jenvey (Vancouver). The enthusiasm and knowledge combined with the\npractical experience and professional training of both Mr. Glover and Mr. Jenvey\nmade an invaluable contribution to the work of this Division.\nInformation and Related Services\nServices related to the curriculum were also provided by the staff of the Division. In addition to meetings and consultation with curriculum officials of the\nProvinces, members of the Division participated in various meetings and conferences at which information on curriculum development was provided.\nAdult Education\n(A. L. Cartier, M.A., Co-ordinator)\nThe enrolment in public-school adult education increased Provincially by 12\nper cent last year to a total of 112,105. In 26 districts the increase was over 25\nper cent. During the past six years, enrolments have almost tripled. It is interesting to note that most of this growth has taken place outside the Vancouver School\nBoard jurisdiction. Six years ago over 60 per cent of the total enrolment was in\nVancouver. At the present time Vancouver has 30 per cent of the Provincial enrolment while 70 per cent is outside of Vancouver.\nThis growth and shift in enrolment has been due to the increased emphasis\nbeing placed on adult education by so many local School Boards, and to the new\nvalues and satisfactions which adults find in learning. In most communities in\nBritish Columbia the local School Board is the agency in the best position to provide educational services for adults, because of the accessibility of its buildings,\nresources, and personnel, to people where they live and work, and because of its\n INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES\nF 51\nability to respond quickly to educational requirements peculiar to the region it\nserves.\nThe growth of public-school adult education is also in great measure due to\nthe growing sensitivity of local directors to the highly specific educational needs of\nthe people they serve and to their increasing ability to find and mobilize local resources for learning. These resources are trained by in-service workshops, arranged\nby many local directors, to structure their classes in terms of the special needs of\nadult learners.\nSome Trends in Public School Adult Education in British Columbia\n1. A very noticeable trend is the growth in variety of programme format.\nInstead of structuring adult education into a series of courses, many of the directors\nare attempting to meet specific needs through short courses, conferences, workshops, and seminars. This permits programming at more convenient times and\nplaces, and also makes it possible to bring instructional resources to the community from other cities or countries.\n2. The new adult secondary programmes have been well received, as is evident from an 18-per-cent increase in enrolment in these academic programmes\noutside Vancouver. In Vancouver itself most academic adult students are enrolled\nin the Vancouver City College preparatory classes.\n3. The native Indian population have taken a great interest in adult education, not only by joining \" integrated classes,\" but by requesting special classes to\nmeet their specific needs. Last year 450 Indians enrolled in 21 classes designed\nspecifically for them.\n4. Many local industries are showing greater interest in adult education.\nMany large industries pay the fees of employees who successfully complete academic or vocational courses at night school. Some specific programmes are designed in co-operation with industry; for example, the Southern Vancouver Island\nforest industries have worked out with the Duncan School Board a management\nand supervisor training programme for some 80 of their personnel.\n5. The present trend in public-school adult education is to find and use the\ntalent of specialists in industry and in the professional services, and thus to provide\nthe community at large with an opportunity to share in the learning and skills of\nsuch people in a way that could not otherwise happen.\n6. As public-school adult education develops, rather than replace voluntary\neducational services in the community, it tends to co-sponsor adult educational\nactivities, and by its resources and organizational ability tends to help such voluntary groups to become more effective.\n7. There is a slow but growing emphasis on programmes which are designed\nto improve interpersonal relationships through courses or workshops in communications and human relations.\n8. The increased interest of foreign travel has led to renewed interest in foreign language study. In Vancouver there were 81 classes in 13 different foreign\nlanguages last year. In most of these classes new audio-visual techniques are being\nemployed.\n9. The most rapidly growing sector of the adult education programme in British Columbia is the fine arts, where the rate of growth has been about 30 per cent\nper year. The most popular classes in this category are in painting and ceramics.\nServices of the Adult Education Division\nThe Department is primarily involved in assisting local School Boards with\nthe development and improvement of adult education. However, consultative ser-\n F 52 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nvices and assistance are also provided to voluntary community groups and government agencies involved in adult education.\n(a) Assistance to Community Voluntary Organizations. \u00E2\u0080\u0094 During the past\nyear the Department assisted the following community groups to organize conferences and workshops, and in some cases furnished resource persons to help: Canadian Association for Adult Education, Electrical Contractors' Association, Victoria\nP.-T.A. Council, Canadian Council of Women, United Church, Catholic Church,\nY.M.C.A., and Frontier College.\n(b) Co-operation with Other Government Agencies. \u00E2\u0080\u0094 There is a growing\nspirit of co-operation between the various Government agencies who have some\nadult education functions. Out of regular interdepartmental meetings have come\nnumerous ways of effecting co-operation at the Provincial and local levels. This\nDivision has assisted the Community Programmes Branch in organizing and conducting leadership training programmes in Kelowna, Williams Lake, Fort St. John,\nPowell River, Mission, and Prince George. Assistance has been given to the Social\nWelfare Department in organizing and conducting a Provincial conference for foster children and parents in Victoria and also by consultation with the Nelson Regional Social Welfare Division. Consultative services and direct help have been\ngiven to the Adult Education Division of the Indian Affairs Branch by a leadership\nworkshop and by helping with the establishment of 21 special classes for Indians\nin basic education, home arts, handicrafts, and vocational courses. This Division\nhas assisted also by collaborating with the Federal and Provincial agriculture departments in the establishment of local programmes for farmers and orchardists.\nFinally, considerable collaboration has taken place with the Federal Citizenship\nBranch in establishing training programmes for instructors of English as a second\nlanguage and in fostering leadership training for officers of voluntary community\norganizations.\n(c) Assistance to Local School Board Adult Education.\u00E2\u0080\u0094During the year the\nCo-ordinator accepted invitations to meet and consult with five School Boards.\nAssistance was also given in planning and conducting a two-day seminar for the\nWest Kootenay and Okanagan trustees at Selkirk College. In addition, help was\ngiven to plan and conduct two surveys to find out how the people in two districts\nfelt about their needs for adult education and the gaps in their present programmes.\nA large part of the services of the Adult Education Division is concerned with\nthe development of in-service training programmes for the directors and instructors\nengaged in school district adult education programmes. An Easter Provincial conference was held for the directors at Harrison Hot Springs. In addition, regional\nmeetings and conferences were held on Vancouver Island, in the Lower Mainland,\nin the Okanagan, in the East Kootenay, in the West Kootenay, and at Prince George.\nThe Division also organized or conducted instructor-training programmes in New\nWestminster, Kelowna, Cranbrook, and Victoria. An instructor-training programme in how to conduct case studies in business-management classes was held\nin Vancouver in the fall.\nAs opportunities of adult education become more complex, there develops a\ngrowing need to improve counselling services for adult students. In the smaller\ncentres, counselling becomes a major function of the director of adult education.\nSome of the problems connected with the counselling phase of their work were\nstudied at conferences held this year for this purpose in Burnaby and Kelowna.\nFinally, the Department has continued to act as a communications centre for\nthe local directors by arranging for the exchange of information on adult education\nfrom one part of the Province to another, as well as by distributing films, pamphlets,\nand books.\n INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES\nF 53\nSummary Showing Trends in Enrolment, Number of Classes, Number of Instructors,\nand Number of School Districts Participating\n(These statistics are gathered from annual reports submitted by the directors\nof adult education of the participating school districts.)\nYear\nNumber\nof School\nDistricts\nNumber of\nEnrollees\nNumber of\nInstructors\nNumber of\nCourses\n1959/60 \t\n58\n64\n65\n68\n70\n70\n71\n691\n40,867\n40,917\n46,548\n70,405\n78,461\n91,579\n100,292\n112,105\n1,796\n1,945\n2,273\n2,949\n3,454\n3,828\n4,141\n4,982\n1,578\n1960/61\t\n2,220\n1961/62 ' -\t\n1962/63\t\n1963/64\t\n1964/65\n2,219\n3,070\n3,964\n4,261\n1965/66\t\n1966/67\n5,067\n5,637\n1 The number of districts is smaller this year due to amalgamation of school districts.\nVOCATIONAL PROGRAMME\nYear\nNumber of\nEnrollees\nNumber of\nInstructors\nNumber of\nCourses\n1959/60\t\n13,539\n12,530\n9,783\n14,317\n17,510\n21,393\n25,477\n28,556\n540\n552\n518\n685\n880\n1,029\n1,194\n1,432\n322\n1960/61 \t\n552\n1961/6?\n512\n1962/63 \t\n681\n1963/64\t\n910\n1964/65 .......\n1,116\n1965/66-... \t\n1,384\n1966/67 \t\n1,511\nNON-VOCATIONAL PROGRAMME\n1959/60 _ _\n27,328\n28,387\n36,765\n56,008\n60,951\n70,186\n74,815\n83,549\n1,256\n1,393\n1,755\n2,264\n2,574\n2,799\n2,947\n3,550\n1,256\n1960/61 \t\n1,648\n1961/62\t\n1,707\n1962/63 ._ ....\n1963/64 \t\n2,389\n3,054\n1964/65 \t\n3,145\n1965/66 . .. \t\n3,683\n1 .fifi/fi7\n4,126\n F 54\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nClassification of Courses and Enrolment\nVOCATIONAL PROGRAMMEl\nProgramme\nNumber of\nEnrollees\nNumber of\nInstructors\nNumber of\nCourses\n4,772\n7,365\n894\n1,564\n2,155\n1,687\n1,705\n1,220\n1,094\n970\n906\n4,274\n217\n341\n53\n100\n116\n78\n69\n56\n54\n84\n43\n221\n223\nCommercial\t\n396\n54\n113\n133\n81\nLumbering and Forestry _ _\t\n71\n51\n57\n61\n49\n222\nTotals\n28,556\n1,432\n1,511\ni These are vocational courses sponsored by night schools operated by local school districts only.\nNON-VOCATIONAL PROGRAMMES\nAcademic (for credit)\t\nEnglish and Citizenship\t\nLiberal Studies (non-credit)..\nFine Arts \t\nDomestic Arts\u00E2\u0080\u0094 \t\nHobbies and Crafts\t\nParent Education \t\nRecreation and Fitness..\nMiscellaneous \t\nTotals \t\nTotal enrolment.\n11,770\n4,605\n5,152\n9,582\n13,020\n9,730\n2,311\n13,579\n13,800\n492\n219\n241\n427\n618\n468\n102\n507\n474\n83,549\n3,550\n112,105\n4,982\n563\n263\n245\n491\n757\n550\n85\n616\n556\n4,126\n5,637\nThe foregoing figures show an annual growth of about 12 per cent. This\nfigure reflects a steady growth in the utilization of what might otherwise be unused\npotential for learning. It means that utilization of buildings and equipment is being\nmaximized. It means that hitherto untapped teaching abilities are being found and\nmobilized for the education of adults. Finally, it means that more and more adult\nleisure time is being invested in the improvement of the human resources in our\ncommunities.\n iiiiiiiiiiir\n(\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\u00E2\u0080\u00A2\u00E2\u0096\u00A0.\u00E2\u0080\u00A2.\u00E2\u0080\u00A2-\u00E2\u0080\u00A2....is..\"''.:''.';:-.*-'.-.::\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0>V:,\u00C2\u00A3::j:ssw \u00E2\u0096\u00A0\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\n F 56\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nDIVISION OF UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE AFFAIRS\nREPORT OF JOHN D. CHAPMAN, M.A., Ph.D., PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA\nThis Division was established in response to the rapidly rising enrolment in\npost-secondary or tertiary levels of education. As the accompanying tables indicate,\nenrolment at these levels has more than doubled since 1960, two new kinds of\ninstitutions have emerged (the British Columbia Institute of Technology and the\ndistrict and regional colleges), and four new centres have been completed.\nDuring 1966/67 the Division commenced the acquisition and analysis of the\ndata necessary to assess and project enrolment in tertiary education. The acquisition\nphase involved the definition of the data required, the form in which it is to be\nprovided, and the manner in which it is to be filed and processed. To these ends,\ndiscussions were held with the appropriate officers of each institution to secure their\nadvice and co-operation in supplying the data on a regular and permanent basis.\nProjections were prepared for total Provincial enrolment at the post-secondary level,\nand analyses were made of potential enrolment for several proposed district and\nregional colleges. A number of meetings were held with college committees in\norder to facilitate the development of their plans and to provide an opportunity for\nthem to establish direct contact with appropriate members of the Department of\nEducation.\nEnrolment in Public Schools, Colleges, and Universities, 1960-66\nPublic Schools\nColleges and Public Universities^\nYear\nElementary\n(K.-I)\nSecondary\n(VIII-\nXII) i\nGrade\nXIII\nSubtotal\nColleges\nand\nB.C.I.T.\nUniversities\nSubtotal\nGrand\nTotal\n1960/61\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n219,328\n65.6\n228,264\n64.3\n237,236\n63.5\n243,817\n61.7\n256,060\n61.3\n274,589\n61.9\n290,6993\n62.1\n101,049\n30.0\n110,014\n31.0\n118,865\n31.7\n131,865\n33.3\n140,378\n33.5\n143,657\n32.3\n146,7603\n31.3\n1,383\n0.4\n2,012\n0.6\n2,804\n0.8\n2,959\n0.8\n3,626\n0.9\n2,544\n0.5\n2,2333\n0.5\n321,760\n96.0\n340,290\n95.9\n358,905\n96.0\n378,641\n95.8\n400,064\n95.7\n420,790\n94.7\n439,692\n93.9\n\t\n\t\n2,137\n0.5\n3,511\n0.7\n13,034\n4.0\n14,689\n4.1\n15,347\n4.0\n13,034\n4.0\n14,689\n4.1\n15,347\n4.0\n334,794\n100.0\n1961/62\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n345,979\n100.0\n1962/63\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n374,252\n100.0\n1963/64\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\nI\n16,799 | 16,799\n4.2 ! 4.2\n395,440\n100.0\n1964/65\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\nPer cent\t\n1965/66\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber.\nPer cent\t\n1966/67\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\nPer cent\t\n18,024\n4.3\n21,678\n4.8\n24,867\n5.4\n18,024\n4.3\n23,815\n5.3\n28,378\n6.1\n418,088\n100.0\n444,605\n100.0\n468.070\n100.0\n1 Includes special occupational, 1963 and after.\n2 Regular full-time enrolment as of December of the year shown; that\nand does not include summer school, summer semester, non-credit courses, etc.\n3 As of October, 1966. This information was valid at that time only,\navailable at the time of this report.\nis, not full-time equivalent (f.t.e.)\nFigures on the full year were not\n DIVISION OF UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE AFFAIRS\nF 57\nRegular Full-time Enrolment in Post-secondary Public Institutions,\nActual 1960-671\nColleges\nPublic Universities\nGrand\nTotal\nYear\nGraded\nXIII\nColleges^\nB.C.I.T.\nSubtotal\nUndergraduate\nGraduate*\nSubtotal\n1960/61\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n1,383\n9.7\n2,012\n12.0\n2,804\n15.5\n2,959\n15.0\n3,626\n16.8\n2,544\n9.7\n2,233\n7.3\n......\n1,291\n4.9\n2,265\n7.4\n846\n3.2\n1,246\n4.1\n2,137\n8.1\n3,511\n11.5\n12,512\n86.7\n14,010\n83.9\n14,599\n80.4\n15,872\n80.3\n16,904\n77.9\n20,234\n76.7\n23,065\n75.3\n522\n3.6\n679\n4.1\n748\n4.1\n927\n4.7\n1,120\n5.1\n1,444\n5.5\n1,802\n5.9\n13,034\n90.3\n14,689\n88.0\n15,347\n84.5\n16,799\n85.0\n18,024\n83.2\n21,678\n82.2\n24,867\n81.1\n14,417\n100.0\n1961/62\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n16,701\n100.0\n1962/63\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n18,151\n100.0\n1963/64\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n19,758\n100.0\n1964/65\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n21,650\n100.0\n1965/66\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n26,359\n100.0\n1966/67\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber\t\n30,611\n100.0\n1 Note that these numbers refer to regular full-time enrolment as of December of the year shown. They\nare not, therefore, full-time equivalents (f.t.e.).\n2 Includes King Edward Continuing Education Centre up to 1964.\n3 1965, Vancouver City College; 1966, Vancouver City College and Selkirk College.\n4 Registrants in graduate studies (that is, not students who have bachelor's degree before commencing\nprofessional training).\n F 58 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nDIVISION OF TESTS AND STANDARDS\nREPORT OF C. B. CONWAY, B.Sc, M.S., D.P/ed., DIRECTOR\nMuch of the effort of the Division during the past school-year was directed\ntoward the collection of statistics, the dissemination of statistics, and attempts to\nsimplify and mechanize the treatment of statistics. As the data from the 1966\nCensus became available, previous estimates were checked and brought up to date\nand revised projections (usually higher ones) were produced. The great effect of\nrecent immigration of family-allowance-receiving children (net gains of 11,450 in\n1965 and 13,285 in 1966) will be noticed in grade enrolments for the next 17 to 18\nyears even though immigration has decreased sharply since January, 1967. The\ndecreasing birth rates of the past six years should cause elementary-school enrolments to decline slightly from the peak which is expected in 1970, but secondary-\nschool enrolments will continue to increase for an additional five or six years, and\npost-secondary enrolments until 1981.\nA 360 computer programme for the mathematical projection of enrolments\nwas produced by the British Columbia Research Council. Thus a splendid tool has\nbeen acquired by the Department for future use and, as additional data are added\nand modified on the basis of later information, it should be possible to produce and\nrevise forecasts almost continually.\nA beginning was made in up-dating information on schools, school district\npersonnel, and grade enrolments. It is hoped that before long the up-dating procedure will be adopted throughout so that the Department will feed information to\nthe schools rather than the reverse, and the only paper work required from the\nteachers and administrators will be the modification of data that have changed.\nOne meeting of the directorate of the Service for Admission to College and\nUniversity was attended and several meetings of the Ministers' Information Systems\nCommittee. A study of potential college enrolments that was conducted in collaboration with the Division of University and College Affairs and the Department of\nIndustrial Development, Trade, and Commerce produced rather startling results:\nthe retention of students to Grade XIII and the first year of college exceeded 100 per\ncent of the students graduating from British Columbia public schools on the Academic and Technical (formerly the University) Programme the previous June.\nWhat this means is that the number of students who returned to continue their\neducation after an absence of one or more years plus those who removed previous\nacademic deficiencies as private-study candidates exceeded the number of those\nwho graduated but did not continue. Although it is difficult to obtain exact figures\nfor the available population in times of continuous immigration, it is known that\nimmigration is at its lowest levels in the secondary grades and the number of first-\nyear first admissions from British Columbia public schools in 1966 was 29 per cent\nof the corresponding enrolment when a majority of the same students would have\npassed through Grades II to VI. An additional number (perhaps 2 to 3 per cent\nof the public-school students) who enter college outside British Columbia each year\nhas not been included. The same study showed that proximity (less than 15 miles)\nhad a greater effect on which college the students would attend than on the continuation factor.\nAn exhaustive study of methods of forecasting effects of changes in examination procedures was conducted during a 14-month period. The correlation between\nDepartmental examination marks and school marks is surprisingly high and indi-\n DIVISION OF TESTS AND STANDARDS\nF 59\ncates general validity irrespective of which is considered the criterion and which\none the variable. But the teachers assign much smaller proportions of D's and\nE's than do the examinations, and the regression of combined scores toward the\nmean seems to be impossible to predict in advance.\nBritish Columbia Grade X norms for June for the Henmon-Nelson Test of\nMental Ability, 9-12, A, were issued in November. They are the first to be produced for use by teachers at the end of the junior secondary school, and there is still\ngreat need for norms for alternative tests. The norms again indicated the selected\nnature of the British Columbia population. A median of 109 and mean of 111,\nversus a United States norm of 100, were obtained from the scores of 23,669 Grade\nX students, which represents over 90 per cent of the total available public-school\npopulation. The test, which is largely verbal, showed that students enrolled in\ndifferent language courses were highly selected in comparison with the 34 per cent\nnot so enrolled. The subdivision into those who will enrol later in the Academic-\nTechnical and other programmes seems to have been made on the basis of language\ncourses before the end of Grade X.\nNumerical\nEquivalent\nfor Raw\nScore\nPer\nCent\nof\nTotal\nGrade\nX\nPer Cent of Students\nin Languag\n. Courses\nNot\nEnrolled\nin a\nLanguage\nCourse\nFrench\n10\nGerman\n10\nLatin\n10\nSpanish\n10\nFrench\n9\nOther\nLanguages\nand\nLevels\n9\n5.0\n5.0\n15.9\n14.0\n18.5\n17.0\n14.1\n5.3\n5.2\n7.8\n7.5\n22.5\n17.4\n19.7\n13.8\n8.0\n1.9\n1.3\n11.2\n9.6\n15.4\n13.8\n19.7\n16.5\n8.5\n3.7\n1.6\n24.6\n14.3\n25.6\n13.3\n13.3\n5.3\n2.4\n0.8\n0.4\n13.9\n14.8\n17.6\n13.0\n20.4\n7.4\n6.5\n3.7\n2.8\n1.7\n2.0\n10.6\n15.7\n22.0\n23.4\n15.9\n5.2\n3.5\n11.9\n10.7\n24.3\n14.0\n15.6\n9.2\n7.9\n4.2\n2.2\n0.5\n8\n0.8\n7.\t\n6 . \t\n4.6\n7.7\n15.5\n4\n22.1\n3 \t\n2\n1\n25.0\n11.3\n12.5\nMean numerical equivalent _\t\n5.8\n5.7\n6.9\n6.1\n4.6\n6.0\n3.7\n14,046\n188\n532\n108\n1,053\n544\n7,949\nIn collaboration with the Curriculum Branch, which devised the tape, and the\nDivision of Visual Education, which reproduced 150 high-quality copies, an aural\nFrench 12 test was administered and standardized on 4,116 students. Wide variation between schools was noted, but subjectively the standards appeared to be high.\nNew scoring methods have been worked out for the test, and it is expected that\nalternative tapes will be produced in the future.\n F 60 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nHOME ECONOMICS\nREPORT OF MISS MILDRED C. ORR, B.A., B.S., DIRECTOR\nThe total enrolment in Home Economics Courses in the public schools of\nBritish Columbia during the 1966/67 session was 61,841.\nThe enrolment by courses was as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094-\nHE 8 16,448\nFN 9A1 3,103\nFN 9B1 2,388\nFN 9A-B1 6,315\nCT9A1 3,111\nCT 9B1 2,348\nCT 9A-B1 7,875\nCC 9 1,756\nCFS 9 2,065\nOccupational 1, 2, 3__ 2,547\nFd 11\t\n 3,996\nTx 11\t\n3,800\nMgt 11\t\n1,520\nFd 12A\t\n703\nFd 12B\t\n 281\nTx 12A\t\n1,211\nTx 12B\t\n388\nCC 12\t\n- 1,651\nHIS 12\t\n 289\nJericho Hill\t\n 46\n1 The figures for FN 9A, FN 9B, and FN 9A-B are reported separately because some schools offer the A\nand B sections on a semester basis and other schools offer the complete FN 9 course in one year. CT 9 is\noffered in a similar way.\nNotes regarding enrolment figures for 1966/67:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n(1) In 1966/67, course enrolments have been used; in 1965/66, student\nenrolments were used for FN 9 and CT 9.\n(2) Separate figures for the number of Grade XI and XII boys enrolled in\nFd 11 or Fd 12A or Fd 12B are not available. The above enrolment\nfigures for these courses include both boys and girls.\n(3) The increased enrolment in Grade XI courses, in their second year of\noperation in 1966/67, may be indicative, in part, of some improvement\nin understanding of the objectives and content of the courses. However,\nit is realized that much still needs to be done to acquaint pupils, parents,\nand the community with the intent, philosophy, content, and scope of\nthe Community Services Programme and its courses.\n(4) The Grade XII pupils of 1966/67 are the first pupils\n(a) to come from Grade VIII through to Grade XII on the reorganized secondary-school programme;\n(b) to take Community Services Courses numbered 12 or 12A as\nelectives;\n(c) to complete a full specialty (Foods, Textiles, or Home and Industrial Services) on the Community Services Programme.\n(5) Total enrolment for courses numbered 11, 12, 12A, and 12B when\ncompared with the total for pupils enrolled in a complete specialty as\nshown below indicate that a fairly large number of students on other\nprogrammes (including Academic and Technical) are taking Community\nServices Courses as electives.\nThe number of pupils enrolled in a complete specialty of the Community Services Programme was 1,818, made up as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nFoods Specialty 631\nTextiles Specialty 683\nHome and Industrial Services Specialty 504\n HOME ECONOMICS\nF 61\nThere were some pupils enrolled for Home Economics and (or) Community\nServices Courses with the Secondary School Correspondence.\nDuring 1966/67 there were 230 secondary schools offering Home Economics\nand Community Services Courses, showing an increase of nine over the total for last\nyear. Home economics was offered for the first time at Fort St. James, Hudson\nHope, Port McNeill, and Crawford Bay.\nRenovations and additions have been made to many schools throughout the\nyear to provide facilities for the Community Services Courses, and additional equipment is being added to the home economics departments for use in the Community\nServices Courses.\nDuring the year there were four schools (North Kamloops Secondary (School\nDistrict No. 24), Abbotsford Senior Secondary (School District No. 34), Delta\nSecondary (School District No. 37), and Centennial Senior Secondary (School\nDistrict No. 43)) which set up teaching-cafeteria kitchens, where pupils who were\ntaking Food Specialty courses could have instruction, demonstration, and some\nexperience with commercial-type equipment, large-quantity food preparation, and\nservice. The problems in organization of a teaching-cafeteria kitchen operation\nwithin a composite secondary school are recognized, but the co-operation and\nwillingness of staff and administrators to meet new difficulties and to attempt to\nsolve them are to be commended. Teaching-cafeteria kitchens may be considered\nonly for schools whose enrolments are at least 600 in Grades XI and XII. Courses\nof the Foods Specialty are intended as preparation for on-the-job training, for\nfurther education in this field at the post-secondary level, or for personal use.\nDuring the school-year 1966/67 there were 505 home economics teaching\npositions in the public schools of British Columbia, showing an increase of 53 over\nthe preceding year. In 1966/67 over 50 per cent of the 505 teachers held bachelors'\ndegrees in home economics. The percentage of teachers holding Bachelor of Education secondary degrees, with a major in home economics, is gradually increasing.\nSeven men were instructing or collaborating in team teaching with home economics\nteachers in instructing in one or more of CFS 9, Fd 11, Fd 12A, Fd 12B.\nThe turnover of home economics teachers continues to be high, chiefly due to\nhome and family responsibilities of young married women teachers. Married women\nhome economics teachers returning to the teaching profession after interrupted\nservice for home and family responsibilities continue to be a substantial source of\nhelp in meeting the replacement and expansion needs for home economics secondary-\nschool staffs. Some schools have used two half-time teachers of home economics for\na one-teacher load. It is possible that the latter type of arrangement should be given\nmore consideration to help solve staffing needs.\nA member of the Division of Home Economics was at the School of Home\nEconomics, University of British Columbia, for one or two days each week of summer session to interview teachers and prospective teachers of home economics. The\nDirector of Home Economics met with the fourth- and fifth-year Home Economics\nand Home Economics Education students of the University of British Columbia in\nFebruary to give them some information about teaching home economics in British\nColumbia.\nFrequent contacts were made during the school-year with Miss Muriel Johnson,\nsupervisor of home economics in Greater Victoria schools, and Mrs. Margaret\nMurphy, co-ordinator of home economics in Vancouver Schools. A conference of\nthe members of the Division of Home Economics and the two city supervisors of\nhome economics was held in January in Victoria.\nMiss Jean Irvine, Inspector of Home Economics, attended the annual convention of the Canadian Dietetic Association in Ottawa in June. The Director of Home\n F 62 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nEconomics attended the annual convention of the American Home Economics\nAssociation in Dallas, Texas, during the last week of June.\nIn order to estimate the average cost per pupil of supplies for foods courses,\na survey of the costs of approximately one-third of the public schools offering Home\nEconomics and Community Services Courses was made for the five-month period\nof September, 1966, to January, 1967. The data compiled for junior secondary\nschools, junior-senior secondary schools, and senior secondary schools from the survey were forwarded to the District Superintendents of Schools for their information.\nTwo bulletins with current information regarding Home Economics and Community Services Courses were compiled and sent to all teachers of home economics\nand community services of the public secondary schools during the year.\nThe Home Economics and Community Services Textbook Selection Committee,\nunder the Division of Curriculum with the Director and (or) Inspectors of Home\nEconomics as consultant(s), has continued reviewing and assessing the needs for\nthe textbooks for Home Economics and Community Services Courses. New textbooks for CFS 9, CC 9, CC 12, Mgt 11, and HIS 12, which are to be available in\nSeptember, 1967, should be helpful to both teachers and students. A list of references for all the Home Economics and Community Services Courses has been prepared by the Textbook Selection Committee.\nSince 1952 the number of home economics teaching positions in secondary\nschools has increased from 205 to 505, and the number of schools offering home\neconomics has increased from 123 to 230. Because of the greatly increased number\nof schools and of teachers of home economics in public secondary schools, it was\nnecessary to introduce rotating visits to some teachers and schools.\n CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOLS\nF 63\nCORRESPONDENCE SCHOOLS\nSecondary School Correspondence Branch\nREPORT OF J. R. HIND, B.A., B.P_ed., DIRECTOR\nThe preamble to the 1965/66 annual report of the Branch mentions pupils\nand adults who are the object of our special attention. Correspondence courses\nare planned to meet their needs and interests. Provision is made not only for\nthose who seek secondary-school graduation under one of several programmes, but\nalso for those who need to further their knowledge of vocational techniques or\ndesire to extend an interest in art, music, writing, and like pursuits.\nWhile the Branch was organized originally to assist in the formal education\nof young people in remote areas and elsewhere who would be denied all or part of\nsecondary-school education without it, it soon numbered among its registered\nstudents many thousands of adults who saw an opportunity for a continuing formal\neducation. The upsurge of other adult education facilities in recent years has not\nyet affected this enrolment to any extent.\nThe convenience and nature of the instruction are two reasons for this. It will\nbe recognized that many adults find it difficult to keep attendance schedules imposed\nby conventional classroom instruction. Adults have irregular demands on their\ntime, which make it convenient for them to study in the spare hours at their disposal. Thus in a survey of 100 adults who were not forwarding papers for correction, 74 indicated that the silence was temporary only. Further, it is profitable for\nadults of varying backgrounds to complete assignments at their own speed. The\nsubmission of assignments for correction by these students may occur at any time\nwhen mastery of theory and practice exercises is sufficient. Competent instructors\nfill the role of tutor with surprising effectiveness. Special review techniques reinforce the total effort. The result is the individual-attention concept, a much-desired\ngoal of educators, often at its near best. Thus re-registration is a special feature\nof enrolment among adults who have experienced the service.\nThe regulations of the Branch and a description of programmes and courses\nare set forth in the booklet \" Regulations and Detail of Courses for Secondary\nSchool Correspondence Education.\" Other guides and sources of information will\nbe mentioned later in this report, but this booklet represents the most convenient\nsummary for use by the general public and administrators. The booklet is released\nannually in July. The 1966/67 booklet was extended to include the Grade XII\nyear of reorganized programmes of study. A description of the old University and\nGeneral Programmes was retained as a service to those who required one or two\ncourses only to complete their programmes. Among courses listed in the booklet\nwere ten new courses and four revisions. These new and revised courses were\nreleased to coincide with the opening of schools in September, 1966.\n F 64 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nThe details of service rendered by the Branch during 1966/67 follow:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nEnrolment\n(a) By Age: 1963/64 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67\n18 year and under 8,719 9,044 9,117 7,617\n19 years and older 8,555 8,980 8,109 9,296\nTotals 17,274 18,024 17,226 16,914\nNote.\u00E2\u0080\u0094An increasingly successful effort on the part of the Province to meet\nschool accommodation and staffing problems is reflected in the smaller enrolment\nfigures for pupils of school age (see 18 years and under).\n(b) By Sex:\n18 years and under\u00E2\u0080\u0094 m5m 1966/67\nMale - 4,444 3,863\nFemale 4,673 3,754\n19 years and older\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nMale 5,495 6,493\nFemale 2,614 2,803\nTotals-\nMale 9,939 10,356\nFemale 7,287 6,558\n(c) By Residence: 1964/65 1965/66 1966/67\nBritish Columbia 16,930 16,281 15,896\nElsewhere in Canada 832 755 860\nOutside Canada 262 190 158\n(Note.\u00E2\u0080\u0094Enrolment of persons abroad was affected by unsettled political\nconditions in such places as Northern Rhodesia and Asia. Courses were released to\nstudents in Japan, Trinidad, Pakistan, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Sweden, Great\nBritain, Switzerland, Israel, Greece, Mexico, New Zealand, Australia, South America, and Africa. In several instances persons on world trips aboard yachts were\nassisted.)\n(d) In Schools.\u00E2\u0080\u0094Certain pupils were unable to obtain normal classroom instruction in particular courses, as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n1964/65 1965/66 1966/67\nSmall secondary schools (fewer than\n140 pupils in Grades IX to XII) __ 1,380 1,279 1,065\nLarger secondary schools (more than\n140 pupils in Grades IX to XII) 3,286 4,030 3,817\nPrivate schools 424 445 501\nTotals 5,090 5,754 5,383\nThe reasons accepted as a basis for this service and the numbers involved\nfollow:\u00E2\u0080\u0094 1964/65\nCourses not offered in school 3,503\nTime-table difficulties 975\nFailure in a subject 602\nAcceleration 3\n(e) By Special Arrangement.\u00E2\u0080\u0094Certain persons were exempted from enrolment\nfees in the amount of $47,645, compared with $43,217 in 1965/66. This service is\n1965/66\n1966/67\n4,015\n2,902\n899\n956\n838\n678\n2\n3\n CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOLS\nF 65\neffort to overcome disparity in educational opportunity and is also a rehabilitation\nan\nmeasure. It was extended as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nIllness\nNeeded at home\t\nLiving too far from a school\nCorrectional institutions\t\nSocial assistance\t\nUnemployed persons\n1964/65\n1965/66\n1966/67\n476\n465\n484\n12\n6\n9\n455\n425\n360\n1,015\n954\n1,095\n178\n143\n117\n68\n63\n73\n(f) Of Adults.\u00E2\u0080\u0094(i) Per cent of total enrolment: 1963/64, 49.5 per cent;\n1964/65, 49.8 per cent; 1965/66, 47.1 per cent; 1966/67, 54.9 per cent.\n(ii) Counselling and evaluations were provided when adults desired to complete an interrupted (adult) or other programme of studies. Evaluations numbered\nwell over 1,000.\n(iii) Adults in the senior age-grouping frequently requested courses in English, other languages, art, and the like. A man aged 71 has completed three courses\nin Spanish and had begun Spanish 12.\n(iv) Private companies and certain government departments use courses for\nstaff-training programmes. The following courses have continued to be used for\nthis purpose: Diesel Engines, Automotive Mechanics, Electricity for the Building\nTrades, Electricity 10, Stationary Engineering, Geology, Business Law, and Loan\nGranting.\nInstruction\n(a) The instructional staff consisted of the following: Inside staff (Grade VIII\ninstructors), 2; outside staff, 97; total, 99.\n(b) Additions and replacements in the instructional staff numbered 10. The\ndeaths of Mr. W. W. Melville and Mr. G. Anstey, instructors in Automotive Mechanics and Mechanical Drawing respectively, are noted with regret. Their contribution to the effort of the Branch was substantial.\n(c) A total of 195,713 papers was graded in 1966/67, compared with 204,-\n694 papers in 1965/66.\n(d) Course-writers attached to staff were available at all times for counsel and\nassistance to instructors and for adjudication of student papers as required.\nCourses\n(a) Registration was accepted in a total of 139 courses.\n(b) New courses were prepared and released as follows: The Realm of Canada (a Centennial Year course), Child Care 12, English (Remedial), English 11,\nGeneral Business 12, German 10, Industrial Power 11, Loan Granting for Credit\nUnions (pilot course), Physical Science 11, Poultry Keeping (Major Revision),\nMathematics 12, and Textiles 11.\n(i) The Realm of Canada.\u00E2\u0080\u0094A 1967 Centennial Year course released early\nin the year directed at segments of the population who live for the most\npart in smaller centres and remote regions of the Province, who have a\nformal education to the level of Grade X and probably a limited knowledge of the history, geography, and the economic background of Canada.\nThe course was written in a simple style but with some attention to questions which are foremost in the minds of all thinking Canadians. It was\navailable to interested persons without payment of registration fees.\n(ii) Physical Science 11.\u00E2\u0080\u0094The special conditions which apply to instruction\nby mail make it impractical to offer the new Science 11 courses as part\n F 66 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nof the correspondence programme. In these circumstances, approval was\ngiven for the preparation of a special correspondence course to be known\nas Physical Science 11. This course may be used in certain instances to\nsatisfy the minimum science requirement of the Academic-Technical Programme. The conditions which apply to release of the course are contained in Curriculum Circular 7.9.66, section 585.\n(iii) Poultry Keeping.\u00E2\u0080\u0094This course contains the most up-to-date information\nabout the poultry industry as it is operated in Canada. It was rewritten\nby Dr. A. T. Hill, a Federal poultry expert,\n(iv) With the exception of two other courses, the remaining released in\n1966/67 relate directly to the reorganized programmes of study.\n(c) The work of course writing and revision was shared by four course-writers\nattached to the Division and certain outside writers working on a temporary basis.\nThis staff deserves special commendation for meeting so well the changes brought\nabout by the reorganized curriculum.\n(_i) Also must be mentioned, Miss M. E. J. Speed, M.A., and the staff working with her, who were responsible for the briefing of outside course-writers, the\nediting and proofreading of manuscripts, and the cutting of plates in preparation for\nprinting. This section of the staff has made a significant contribution to the work\nof the Branch in producing a finished product and in meeting urgent time schedules,\n(e) The following old courses were withdrawn: Business Arithmetic 9, Chemistry 91, Homemaking 20A and 20B, English Language (Remedial), English Language 30, English Literature 30, and German 20.\n(/) A total listing of courses offered by the Branch and enrolment in the\nsubject field follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n(i) Secondary-school and Grade XIII Courses:\nAgriculture 9,10, 38, 39 127\nArt 9, 10, 39 273\nAuto Mechanics 10, 30 424\nBible Literature 9, 10, 11, 12 65\nBiology 91 (11) 234\nBookkeeping 11, 12 (91) 686\nBusiness Arithmetic 9 35\nBusiness Fundamentals 10 154\nChemistry 11 (91), 101 64\nChild Care 12 42\nClothing and Textiles 9 155\nDiesel Engines 11 101\nDrafting 11 137\nEconomics 11 159\nElectricity 10 241\nEnglish Language 8, 9, 10, 30, 40, 100, 101 2,892\nEnglish Literature 8, 9, 10, 30, 40, 100, 101 2,370\nEnglish and Citizenship 19, 29 223\nEnglish 11 258\nEnglish 32 (Journalism) 30\nEnglish Literature 12 (English 91) 271\nEnglish 99 (Short-story Writing) 95\nEnglish 93 (Business English) 109\nExtramural Music 9, 10 17\nFoods and Nutrition 9 100\nForestry 11 171\n CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOLS\nF 67\n(i)\nSecondary-school and Grade XIII Courses-\nFrame House Construction 10, 11\n-Continued\n(ii)\nGeneral Business 11, 12\t\nGeneral Mathematics 11\t\nGeography 12 (91)\t\nGeology 12\t\nGerman 9, 10, 11, 12 (92), 90, 110, 120-\nGuidance and Health 8, 9,10, 11\t\nHistory 12 (91), 101, 102 _\nHome Furnishing 11\nHomemaking 8, 20, 30, 91\t\nIndustrial Power 11\t\nLatin 9, 10, 11, 12 (92), 110, 120.\nLaw 11\t\n 71\nFrench 8, 9, 10, 11 (91), 12 (92), 110, 120 __. 1,513\n 204\n 246\n 272\n 110\n 800\n 621\n 605\n 82\n 318\n 54\n 398\n 401\n 4,688\n 553\n 42\n 54\n 413\n 194\n 258\n 813\n 29\n 232\n 1,586\n 569\n 30\n 618\n 233\nMathematics 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 20, 30, 91, 101, 120.\nMechanical Drawing 8, 9\t\nPhysics 101\nPhysical Science 11\t\nPractical Arithmetic 9 _\nRadio and Wireless 30.\nRecord Keeping 9\t\nScience 8, 9, 10\nSecretarial Practice 92\t\nShorthand 10, 11, 31\t\nSocial Studies 8, 9, 10, 11 -\nSpanish 9, 10, 11, 12, 110,\nTextiles 11\t\nTypewriting 9, 10, 11\n120\nVocational Mathematics 9, 10 _\nVocational Non-credit Courses:\nAir Navigation I, II.\nBusiness Law for Credit Union Officers .\nDressmaking\t\nElectricity for the Building Trades\t\nGlove-making\t\nHouse Painting and Decorating\t\nIndustrial Mathematics\t\nMathematics for Second-class Steam Engineering.\nSpherical Trigonometry\t\nSteam Engineering, Fourth Class\t\nSteam Engineering, Third Class\t\nSteam Engineering, Second Class\t\nStationary Engineering, First Class.\nSteam Heating for Plant Operators (Class B)\nSteam Heating for Plant Operators (Class A)\nRealm of Canada (Centennial course)\t\nSupervision\n50\n77\n22\n267\n7\n22\n402\n104\n12\n422\n219\n52\n23\n34\n33\n31\n(a) Correspondence Pupils in Schools.\u00E2\u0080\u0094The Branch through direct contact\nwith the schools made every effort to have pupils taking correspondence courses\nfully supervised by staff representatives. These representatives were encouraged to\n F 68 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nfollow procedures outlined on page 72 of the Administrative Bulletin for Secondary\nSchools, 1965. When this guide was adopted, the beneficial results were clearly\napparent.\n(..) Correspondence Students Working in Isolation.\u00E2\u0080\u0094The Branch, through its\nofficers and instructors, made every effort to keep a direct contact with these students\nthrough personal letters and comments of encouragement, correction, and sometimes\nadmonition.\n(c) Tests.\u00E2\u0080\u0094In final-year courses and Departmental examination subjects,\nsupervision of tests was entrusted to persons normally acceptable to the Provincial\nBoard of Examiners. In other courses, persons of good character and standing in\nthe community were approved. (See Regulations and Detail of Courses, 1966/67,\npage 17.)\n(d) Under Section 20 of the Public Schools Act.\u00E2\u0080\u0094This special supervision\narrangement for correspondence pupils was established for 16 pupils from Grades\nVIII to X.\nNew Canadians\n(a) Assistance was provided by the Branch to the following groups:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n(i) Persons enrolling in English and Citizenship 1, English 19, English 29,\nespecially designed to teach English as a second language, were as follows:\n1964/65, 290; 1965/66, 197; 1966/67, 223.\n(ii) Provision of textbooks and other material for students working privately\nunder the guidance of a tutor,\n(iii) Provision of textbooks for the use of students enrolled in private-school\nclasses and some classes conducted by School Boards. Certain School\nBoards now purchase material directly from publishers. The textbooks\navailable through this Branch were English and Citizenship, Books I, II,\nand III. Book I was supplied on a loan basis with new textbooks added\nas the need demands. Other reference material was supplied also as it\nwas received from the Queen's Printer in Ottawa. In recent years the\nfollowing have been available from Ottawa in quantity: Introduction to\nCanada, Our History, Our Land, Our Government, Our Resources.\n CORRESPONDENCE SCHOOLS\nF 69\nElementary Correspondence School\nREPORT OF ARTHUR H. PLOWS, B.Ed., DIRECTOR\nDuring the school-year 1966/67, pupils of school age totalling 874 were registered in Elementary Correspondence School. Of these, 791 were registered at\nVictoria and 83 at Pouce Coupe in the Peace River District.\nThe following tables show the active monthly enrolments at each of the\ncentres:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nENROLLED AT VICTORIA\nMonth\nGrade\nGrade\nGrade\nGrade\nGrade\nGrade\nGrade\nI\nII\nIII\nrv\nV\nVI\nVII\n84\n69\n52\n58\n57\n65\n47\n99\n65\n64\n75\n60\n79\n62\n96\n62\n67\n70\n60\n85\n70\n103\n69\n64\n67\n59\n77\n74\n97\n57\n60\n65\n55\n67\n77\n102\n56\n64\n63\n53\n62\n75\n105\n59\n59\n61\n54\n71\n72\n104\n58\n58\n58\n51\n74\n74\n98\n52\n60\n59\n54\n71\n75\n95\n55\n66\n56\n51\n76\n81\nTotal\nSeptember ..\nOctober\t\nNovember-\nDecember...\nJanuary\t\nFebruary-\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune\t\n432\n504\n510\n513\n478\n475\n481\n478\n468\n480\nENROLLED AT POUCE COUPE (PEACE RIVER BRANCH)\nSeptember-\nOctober .....\nNovember..\nDecember...\nJanuary\t\nFebruary\t\nMarch\t\nApril\t\nMay\t\nJune \t\n8\n8\n4\n2\n6\n9\n2\n11\n11\n5\n3\n8\n10\n5\n11\n12\n5\n4\n7\n10\n6\n12\n13\n5\n4\n6\n10\n8\n14\n13\n10\n4\n6\n9\n8\n14\n13\n12\n4\n7\n10\n8\n14\n13\n12\n4\n7\n10\n8\n15\n14\n12\n4\n7\n10\n6\n13\n14\n10\n4\n7\n10\n6\n13\n14\n10\n4\n7\n9\n6\n39\n53\n55\n58\n64\n68\n68\n68\n64\n63\nThe number of papers of school-aged pupils marked at the two centres was as\nfollows: Victoria, 95,076; Pouce Coupe, 9,653; total, 104,729.\nIn addition to above numbers, adult students enrolled in courses Grades III to\nVII, inclusive, totalled 118, and 6,278 papers were marked at the Victoria centre.\nIn all, courses were provided for 992 individuals and 111,007 papers were\nmarked by the instructors at the two centres. No outside markers or instructors\nwere employed.\nThe average number of papers marked per instructor was 9,251. The average\nnumber of papers submitted per pupil was 112.\nAs additional services, kindergarten kits were supplied to 164 pre-school-age\nchildren and instruction kits for teaching illiterate adults were sent in 27 cases.\nAuthorized under section 20 of the Public Schools Act, correspondence instruction classes were established at 16 centres with a total enrolment of 65 pupils.\nDuring the school-year the following entirely new courses were produced:\nLanguage Arts (Reading), Grades III, IV, and V; Language Arts (Spelling) and\nLanguage Arts (Writing), Grade II; Art, Grades I, II, III, and V. Revisions were\ncarried out in five other courses currently used and new formats devised in other\ncourses and supplementary material. All these were devised, written, and illustrated\nby the staff of the school in Victoria. No outside course-writers were employed.\nThe Victoria staff consisted of a Director, 11 instructors, and five clerks; at\nPouce Coupe, one instructor and one instructor-clerk.\n F 70 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nDIVISION OF SCHOOL BROADCASTS\nREPORT OF BARRIE A. BLACK, ACTING DIRECTOR\nOF SCHOOL BROADCASTS\nProgrammes Presented\nRadio\nProvincial programmes (planning, preparation, supervision of production, evaluation) 105\nRegional programmes produced locally (planning, preparation, supervision, evaluation) 25\nRegional programmes produced elsewhere (planning, evaluation) 34\nNational programmes (planning, evaluation) 35\nTotal number of radio programmes presented 199\nTelevision\nProvincial programmes (planning, preparation, supervision of production, evaluation) 32\nRegional programmes produced locally (planning, preparation, supervision of production, evaluation) 5\nRegional programmes produced elsewhere (planning, evaluation) 23\nNational programmes (planning, evaluation) 69\nTotal number of television programmes presented 129\nManuals and Guides (Prepared and Distributed)\nCentennial song booklets 31,000\nJunior music booklets 75,000\nIntermediate music booklets 72,000\nA propos booklets 18,000\nBritish Columbia Teachers' Bulletins\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nElementary 12,000\nSecondary 3,200\nCalendars\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nRadio 15,200\nTelevision 15,200\nUse of School Broadcasts\nSchools reporting 1,262\nSchools using radio broadcasts 833\nDivisions using radio broadcasts 4,074\nStudents using radio broadcasts 124,713\nSchools using television broadcasts 446\nDivisions using television broadcasts 2,484\nStudents using television broadcasts _____ 74,661\n division of school broadcasts\nComparison of School Broadcast Utilization\nF 71\nRadio\nTelevision\n1965/66\n1966/67\nIncrease\n1965/66\n1966/67\nIncrease\nSchools using\t\n870\n4,036\n124,562\n833\n4,074\n124,713\n-371\n38\n151\n340\n1,725\n52,880\n446\n2,484\n74,661\n106\n759\n21,781\ni Decrease.\nAward\nThe School Broadcasts Division has won an international award for educational television broadcasting. Stimulus-Response \" Detection \" was judged the\nbest educational television programme in the Natural and Physical Sciences at the\nInstitute for Education by Radio-Television, Ohio State University.\nCitation\nFor unusual integration of intricate subject-matter and instructional method, a\ncareful blending of film and studio technique, providing clear and provocative demonstration of animal behaviours that should result in a maximum of pupil involvement and lead to valuable classroom follow-up.\n F 72\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nDIVISION OF VISUAL EDUCATION\nREPORT OF J. R. POLLOCK, B.A.Sc, DIRECTOR\nSubmitted herewith is the circulation report of the Division of Visual Education\ncovering the period September 1, 1966, to August 31, 1967.\nNumber of\nMotion Pictures\nSupplied\n 184\n 134\nDistrict Number and Name\n1. Fernie\t\n2. Cranbrook\t\n3. Kimberley ..\n4. Windermere\n7. Nelson\t\n8. Slocan \t\n9.\n10.\n11.\n12.\n13.\nCasdegar \t\nArrow Lakes\nTrail\t\nGrand Forks\nKettie Valley\n14. Southern Okanagan\n15. Penticton\t\nKeremeos\t\nPrinceton\t\nGolden\t\n16,\n17,\n18,\n19\n20\n21,\n22,\n23,\nRevelstoke\t\nSalmon Arm\t\nArmstrong-Spallumcheen\nVernon\t\nKelowna \t\n24. Kamloops\n25. Barriere \u00E2\u0080\u0094\nBirch Island\t\nWilliams Lake\nQuesnel \t\nLillooet\t\nSouth Cariboo\nMerritt\t\n26.\n27.\n28.\n29.\n30.\n31.\n32. Fraser Canyon\n33. Chilliwack \t\n34. Abbotsford\t\n35. Langley \t\n36. Surrey\t\n37. Delta \t\n38.\n39.\n40.\n41.\nRichmond \t\nVancouver \t\nNew Westminster\nBurnaby\n42. Maple Ridge.\n43. Coquidam\n44. North Vancouver.\n288\n189\n428\n97\n332\n221\n98\n217\n138\n150\n332\n26\n110\n286\n340\n454\n364\n843\n443\n823\n55\n41\n946\n511\n121\n495\n94\n438\n2,408\n462\n1,428\n2,271\n125\n6\n912\n938\n27\n472\n675\n626\nNumber of\nFilmstrips\nSupplied\n146\n9\n439\n414\n502\n94\n792\n132\n93\n313\n278\n12\n270\n13\n99\n360\n283\n394\n562\n936\n448\n859\n175\n175\n1,304\n1,192\n155\n493\n341\n686\n932\n648\n1,229\n3,910\n83\n624\n279\n466\n835\n1,491\n1,690\n347\n DIVISION OF VISUAL EDUCATION\nF 73\nDistrict Number and Name\n45. West Vancouver ..\n46. Sechelt\t\n47.\n48.\n49.\n50.\n51.\nPowell River\nHowe Sound _\nOcean Falls __\nBurns Lake\t\nVanderhoof\t\nPrince George\nMcBride\t\nQueen Charlotte\nPorUand Canal _\n52. Prince Rupert\t\n53. Terrace\t\n54. Smithers \t\n55.\n56.\n57.\n58.\n59.\n60.\n61.\n62.\n63.\n64.\n65.\n66.\n67.\n68.\n69.\n70.\n71. Courtenay\t\n72. Campbell River\nMission \t\nAgassiz\nPeace River South\nPeace River North\nGreater Victoria \u00E2\u0080\u0094\nSooke \t\nSaanich\t\nGulf Islands\nCowichan ___\nLake Cowichan\nLadysmith \t\nNanaimo \t\nQualicum\t\nAlberni\t\n75.\n76.\n77.\n78.\n79.\n80.\n81.\n82.\n83.\n84.\n85.\n86.\n87.\nSummerland\nEnderby.\nUcluelet-Tofino\nKitimat\t\nFort Nelson\t\nChilcotin \t\nPortage Mountain\t\nVancouver Island (West) .\nVancouver Island (North)\nCreston-Kaslo \t\nStikine\t\nUnattached\t\nMiscellaneous\t\nTotals\nNumber of\nNumber of\nMotion Pictures\nFilmstrips\nSupplied\nSupplied\n381\n165\n469\n620\n929\n1,069\n181\n73\n221\n402\n319\n299\n77\n53\n259\n474\n253\n369\n60\n108\n156\n210\n215\n452\n388\n554\n277\n126\n705\n921\n333\n495\n2,257\n390\n539\n450\n303\n156\n151\n215\n465\n147\n17\n274\n5\n500\n251\n153\n221\n642\n598\n807\n1,235\n899\n1,620\n528\n381\n22\n91\n211\n262\n132\n83\n110\n43\n49\n145\n130\n196\n81\n65\n65\n186\n165\n617\n159\n282\n265\n129\n188\n243\n469\n690\n206\n35,055\n39,097\nThe photographic section prepared and produced 380 filmstrips on the history\nof British Columbia, 300 in colour on the biotic regions of British Columbia, 300\nfilmstrips in colour on forestry in British Columbia. This section also produced a\nmotion picture for the Community Programmes Branch on physical education. The\nsection prepared titles for and edited a motion picture on teaching physical education\n F 74 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nto blind students at Jericho Hill School, and started production on a film for teaching geography showing the use of an erosion table. Twelve single-concept 8-mm.\nloop films were also prepared from existing footage. A photographic record was\nmade of current methods of teaching art in the elementary school and of teaching\nreading by the initial teaching alphabet. A start was made on the production of two\nfilmstrips for the Technical Vocational Training Programme, one of which is an\noutiine of the training courses offered throughout the Province and the other on the\nhospitality industry.\nIn addition to this, photographs were supplied for publication and other\npurposes.\n TEXTBOOK BRANCH F 75\nTEXTBOOK BRANCH\nREPORT OF D. W. C. HUGGINS, DIRECTOR\nThe ever-growing volume of textbooks needed to meet the instructional demands of the public schools of the Province brings with it the need for constant\nreview and revision of methods needed to procure, store, and distribute this volume.\nWith the inventory need of over 2,000,000 items, it becomes increasingly more difficult to arrange the purchase and receipt of these items into the storage capacity of\nthe Textbook Branch within the short period of time which has by tradition become\navailable for this need. Investigation has revealed the possibility of advance ordering of those tides remaining on the curriculum so that the receiving and storing of\nbooks can take place over the complete 12 months of operation in the annual cycle.\nIn the month of July, 1966, orders were placed with publishers for British\nColumbia manufacture of those texts which would be required in the curriculum\nfor the ensuing school-year, and deliveries of these orders were made from September of the same year continuing through into 1967. Such an arrangement resulted\nin a larger inventory holding at the end of the fiscal year, and this situation is reflected in the accounting statement. However, the advance production of reordered\ntides by the British Columbia manufacturer enabled a smoother scheduling of the\nover 60 new tides being introduced for the 1967/68 school-year. At the same time\nthe work load related to receipts of books by the Textbook Branch was spread out\nover the 12-month period, thus becoming more manageable. At the time of writing\nthis report, over 1,000 tons of textbooks have been accumulated for distribution to\nthe schools of the Province for the 1967/68 school-year.\nThe effects of the repair programme instituted during school closure in 1966\nalso contributed to the larger inventory holding at the end of the fiscal year. As the\nrepaired books were returned to the schools before reopening, it was not necessary\nto make issues from stock, as in previous years, to meet school needs resulting from\nloss of the repairable texts. This saving, which is experienced in the first year of\noperation only, contributed to the under-expenditure of the Free Vote for the\n1966/67 fiscal year. However, in spite of this sobering effect on the Rental Plan\noperation, the gap between rental collections and cost of operation continued to\nwiden, although some economies were made in the total operational expenses experienced by the Textbook Branch.\nRevisions have been made to the Rental Plan report forms, so that the major\naccounting for fees is finalized by March 15th of a school-year and no further reporting is necessary until October 15th of the next school-year. In this way full attention can be directed to the meeting of school orders during the late spring and early\nsummer months. At the same time, school-opening requisition forms have received\ntheir share of attention, and the order form has been simplified by separation of the\ninventory control columns to form a reconciliation report which need not be submitted until early in the following school-year. These revisions have been made in\nan attempt to expedite the clerical processing of the order forms by the screening\nstaff of the Textbook Branch.\nDuring the year's activities some changes were made in the staff roster due to\ntransfers, promotions, and resignations. On June 1, 1967, we were saddened to\nlearn of the death of Mr. William (Bill) Pepper, who had succumbed to an illness\nwhich he had been suffering from for some considerable time. Mr. Pepper had\nbeen a capable and conscientious worker in the Branch for the past 10 years, and\n F 76\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nhis pleasant personality and generous nature will make his passing the more deeply\nfelt among his fellow workers.\nStatistical comparisons of operations are shown below:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nAmounts\n1967\n1966\nIncrease (+) or\nDecrease (\u00E2\u0080\u0094)\nAmount\nPer\nCent\nSales \t\nPurchases \t\nYear-end inventory\t\nOperating costs (sales)..\nAccounts receivable\t\nAdvances from Consolidated Revenue Fund-\nRental Plan operations\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nDepreciation expense \t\nOperating costS-\nGross cost of plan-\nFees collected\t\nNet cost (subsidy) of plan..\nCharges to the Free Vote (Grades I to VI)..\nDelivery activities\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nFreight-\nItems \t\nWeight (lb.)..\nExpress\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nItems\t\nMail-\nWeight (lb.)_.\nItems..\nWeight (lb.)_\n$1,473,036\n$4,013,400\n$1,903,332\n$70,059\n$12,751\n$3,721,011\n$1,629,468\n$105,088\n$1,734,556\n$976,279\n$758,277\n$774,884\n50,579\n2,247,157\n74\n1,906\n37,148\n103,364\n$1,597,168\n$3,328,424\n$1,086,290\n$79,207\n$19,137\n$2,616,413\n$1,374,253\n$89,319\n$1,463,572\n$888,649\n$574,923\n$994,408\n43,133\n2,061,490\n357\n11,611\n35,239\n89,064\n-$124,132\n+$684,976\n+$817,042\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094$9,148\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094$6,386\n+$1,104,598\n+$255,215\n+$15,769\n+$270,984\n+$87,630\n+$183,354\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094$219,524\n+7,446\n+ 185,667\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094283\n-9,705\n+ 1,909 |\n+ 14,300 |\n7.8\n20.6\n75.2\n11.5\n33.4\n42.2\n18.6\n17.7\n18.5\n9.9\n31.9\n22.1\n17.3\n9.0\n79.3\n83.6\n5.4\n16.1\n INSPECTION OF SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL SERVICES\nF 77\nINSPECTION OF SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL SERVICES\nREPORT BY W. D. REID, B.A., M.Ed., CHIEF INSPECTOR\nOF SCHOOLS\nThe school-year 1966/67 brought the first graduates from the senior secondary\nschools at the Grade XII level to completion of the new programmes which had been\nintroduced five years earlier in the secondary schools of the Province of British\nColumbia.\nReports from the field staff of the Department of Education, the District Superintendents of Schools, have been studied by the writer of this report, and trends and\nhighlights found in these will be summarized in a later section of this report. In\ngeneral, from visits to various parts of this far-flung Province, one notes considerable acceleration in the rate of change in education and its services in the Province.\nOrganization and Staff\nThe total of 57 District Superintendents and six Vancouver City officials represents an increase in staff of one over previous years. Two new District Superintendents were appointed\u00E2\u0080\u0094Mr. J. M. Evans, principal of the Ganges Secondary\nSchool, and Mr. W. J. Zoellner, principal of the Grand Forks Secondary School.\nThe provision of an additional staff member made it possible for the Department\nof Education to utilize one of the newly appointed District Superintendents in an\nitinerant role. Mr. W. J. Zoellner was appointed to this position, and he served in\nmany parts of the Province in the school-year 1966/67, assisting those District\nSuperintendents whose work loads had become extremely heavy.\nOther changes in assignment are shown in the following transfers and appointments:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n(1) Mr. Chell from Assistant District Superintendent of Schools, School District No. 61 (Greater Victoria), to District Superintendent of Schools,\nSchool District No. 61 (Greater Victoria), with effect September 1, 1966.\n(2) Mr. A. J. Longmore from District Superintendent of Schools, School District No. 55 (Burns Lake) and School District No. 56 (Vanderhoof), to\nAssistant District Superintendent of Schools, School District No. 61\n(Greater Victoria), with effect September 1, 1966.\n(3) Mr. J. M. Evans to District Superintendent of Schools, School District No.\n55 (Burns Lake) and School District No. 56 (Vanderhoof), with headquarters in Vanderhoof, effective September 1, 1966.\n(4) Mr. W. J. Zoellner to Relieving District Superintendent of Schools with\nheadquarters in the Department of Education, Victoria, effective August\n15, 1966.\n(5) Mr. D. H. MacKirdy, District Superintendent of Schools, School District\nNo. 53 (Terrace) and School District No. 54 (Smithers), moved his headquarters from the Board offices at Smithers to the Board offices at Terrace, with effect September 1, 1966.\n(6) Mr. C. Cuthbert assumed charge of the superintendency comprising School\nDistrict No. 12 (Grand Forks), School District No. 13 (Kettie Valley),\nand School District No. 14 (Southern Okanagan) with headquarters at\nOliver, effective September 15, 1966.\n F 78 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\n(7) Mr. W. A. Marchbank assumed charge of the superintendency comprising\nSchool District No. 7 (Nelson) and School District No. 8 (Slocan) with\nheadquarters in Nelson, effective September 15, 1966.\nA total of 11,267 visits to classrooms was made and 3,610 reports were written upon the learning situations in the classrooms of the public schools of the Province. In addition, the members of the field staff of the Department of Education\nattended 4,397 meetings in the districts in which they served.\nIn-service Education\nZone Conferences\nZone conferences of District Superintendents of Schools were held in the fall\nof 1966 as shown below. Similar conferences were not held in the spring in view\nof the fact that a Department conference or Department staff meeting was held in\nMarch of 1967. Details of the staff meeting will be found later in this report.\nAs in the past, the zone conferences were chaired by men in the field and the\nagendas were developed locally but allowed a period for information and suggestions to be brought from the headquarters of the Department of Education.\nZone Location Date(s)\nNorth Quesnel October 13, 1966.\nKootenay Castlegar October 24, 1966.\nOkanagan Merritt November 3 and 4, 1966.\nFraser Valley Surrey October 31, 1966.\nIsland Duncan November 18, 1966.\nMetropolitan Burnaby November 23, 1966.\nDepartment of Education Staff Meeting, March 29 to 31,1967\nThe biennial meeting of the Department of Education was held in Victoria on\nthe Lansdowne Campus of the University of Victoria from March 29 to 31, 1967.\nAll District Superintendents of Schools and branch heads were in attendance at the\nconference, as well as the Minister, the Deputy Minister, and members of the headquarters staff. The total attending the conference was just over 100 persons.\nThe considerable help which members of the headquarters staff and the executive of the British Columbia Association of School Superintendents and Inspectors\nof Schools gave in the design and operation of the conference is gratefully acknowledged.\nThe conference was in the form of a workshop. However, all sessions were\nplenary, and various members of the field staff acted as chairmen and recorders of\nthe sessions. The major speakers at the conference were the Honourable the Minister of Education, Dr. L. R. Peterson; Dr. G. Neil Perry, Deputy Minister of Education; Mr. F. P. Levirs, Superintendent of Education; Mr. J. R. Meredith, Assistant Superintendent (Instruction); and Mr. J. Phillipson, Assistant Superintendent\n(Administration).\nMany of the sessions were given over to the discussion of problems which had\nbeen raised in advance by members of the field staff and which were resolved through\nthe use of resource personnel in a panel setting.\nPost-conference reaction indicated that the Department staff meeting had\nachieved its purpose of resolving problems and clarifying Department positions in\nmatters of policy. The writer would be remiss if he did not mention the additional\nhelp which he received in the organization of the conference from Mr. W. J. Zoellner, Relieving District Superintendent of Schools, who bore much responsibility for\nthe detail of the meeting.\n INSPECTION OF SCHOOLS AND SCHOOL SERVICES\nF 79\nWorkshops for Teachers\nThe number of workshops held for and by teachers in the Province was marked\nby an over-all increase.\nOne must recognize and pay respect to the teachers and others concerned with\neducation who have shown a willingness to devote out-of-school time to these necessary and effective means of preparation for new courses. It is also interesting to\nnote that much time has been spent by those active in education in considering and\ndeveloping changing concepts of the educational process.\nGeneral Observations from a Study of District\nSuperintendents' Reports\nMost District Superintendents reported enrolment in school districts to be increasing, which produced the usual needs for increased facilities and accommodation.\nReports reflect the changes which new programmes in the schools have had\nupon the need for improved building facilities. Many new structures have been\nprovided in the areas of industrial education, science laboratories, and library facilities. It is to be noted that the number of one-roomed schools in the Province continues to decrease.\nThe trend to provide special classes at the elementary-school level for those\npupils who may suffer a handicap is commented upon in many reports. The complementary provision of special classes for pupils who are academically gifted is also\napparent. The concept of continuous progress has gained favour in many elementary schools in the Province, and many projects aimed at the individualization of\ninstruction in order that children may proceed to learn at their own rate were to be\nfound in the schools.\nWith the opening of regional colleges and the expansion of universities, the\nnumber of school districts offering Grade XIII has declined. The number of students enrolled in Grade XIII has also decreased slightly.\nSeveral reports indicate that teachers are receiving assistance in their work\nthrough the provision of teacher aides, library assistants, laboratory assistants, markers, and increased stenographic services.\nMany reports mentioned excursions and other projects which were related to\nthe celebration of Canada's Centenary. Aside from Project 100, which was reported\nupon earlier, one notes trips to Expo, dramatic presentations, musical performances,\npublication of local histories, and a host of other worthy projects. The schools have\ntaken full advantage of the opportunity to learn more of Canada at home and afar\nwithin our national boundaries.\nAside from interprovincial pupil visits, which are reported upon by another\nBranch, one must not overlook the extensive programme of interdistrict visitation by\nstudents within our Province. Under the chairmanship of Mr. H. D. Stafford, District Superintendent at Langley, and the co-chairmanship of Mr. J. E. Beech, Assistant District Superintendent, Surrey, an ambitious programme of interdistrict student\ntravel and visitation was carried out in this school-year. Over 500 students at the\nGrade XI level visited districts and attended schools in the district visited for a period\nof a week. This opportunity to learn more of the Province in which they live should\nbe most valuable to our young people. The second year of the Programme is\nplanned for 1967/68.\nThere is frequent mention in reports of the increase in library holdings and in\nlibrary accommodation, particularly at the elementary-school level. Many districts\nhave apparently accepted the view that the library is the \" heart of the school.\" At\n F 80 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nthe same time, the development of district-centred resource centres is commented\nupon in many field reports.\nConclusion\nIn making this final report as Chief Inspector of Schools, the writer wishes to\nexpress thanks and appreciation to his colleagues in the headquarters staff, to District Superintendents of Schools comprising the field staff of the Department of Education, and to the many School Boards and officials of those School Boards with\nwhom it has been his good fortune to work. During the past three years the courtesy and kindness shown to this office and to the writer, personally, are sincerely\nappreciated. It is to be hoped that his successor may be given the same cordial and\nfriendly reception which it has been his good fortune to receive.\n TEACHER RECRUITMENT\nF 81\nTEACHER RECRUITMENT\nREPORT OF PHILIP J. KITLEY, M.A., CO-ORDINATOR\nPromotional Activities\nThe main sources of teacher supply may be identified as the secondary schools,\nthe universities, and adults who for one reason or another may be interested in\nchanging their occupation to that of teaching.\n(a) Secondary Schools\nIn 113 of British Columbia's 146 senior secondary schools, Future Teachers\nClubs were organized, with a total membership of 2,280. In each school a staff\nmembers acts as club sponsor. In seven schools the principal himself was sponsor.\nIn a large number of schools the same sponsor has given loyal service for a number\nof years, in some cases as many as seven or eight.\nThe booklet \" Teaching in British Columbia \" is supplied to each member of\na Future Teachers Club, and in schools where no club is organized, copies are put\nin the hands of counsellors. Each club sponsor is provided with a kit of assorted\nmaterial, including the club handbook, which was revised this year. In addition,\nfive issues of a club newsletter were sent to all members during the year. Other\nmaterials, such as membership cards, were also supplied.\nVarious organizations, specifically the universities, the British Columbia School\nTrustees Association, and the British Columbia Teachers' Federation, work closely\nwith Future Teachers Clubs. In January a two-day Future Teachers Conference\nwas held at the University of Victoria. Two delegates each from most clubs attended\nthis informative familiarization event. The Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment\nacts as Departmental adviser in this connection. Plans were laid during the year\nfor a fall 1967 seminar for sponsors of Future Teachers Clubs, this being sponsored\nchiefly by the British Columbia School Trustees Association, with the co-operation\nof the University of British Columbia.\nEvidence shows that membership in a Future Teachers Club contributes sig-\nnificandy to success in a teacher-education programme, and that the presence of a\nclub in a secondary school influences student decisions far beyond club membership.\nAn invitation to attend the Newfoundland Teachers' Association convention\nat Easter was accepted by the Co-ordinator, and an address given on British Columbia's Future Teachers Clubs organization.\n(b) The Universities\nDuring March addresses were given to a large proportion of the freshmen at\nthe University of British Columbia who were not enrolled in a teacher-education\nprogramme, with the objective of explaining the need for teachers, the advantages\nand rewards of teaching, and the routes by which teacher education can be secured.\nA visit was also paid to the University of Victoria and the Victoria School Board's\nInstitute for Adult Studies. Advantage was also taken to counsel interested persons\nattending the university summer session.\n(c) Adults\nA large number of inquiries from interested adults were dealt with, including\npersonal interviews. While the Department of Education does not place teachers,\n F 82 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\ninformation about school vacancies was made available, as far as possible, on request\nfrom persons holding teaching certificates.\nSurveys\nDuring the summer, periodic surveys were made of teaching vacancies, the\nnormal trends being again apparent.\nThe survey of teacher qualification completed in December also revealed continuing trends, as may be noted in the accompanying graph. The steady increase\nin the numbers of teachers with regular or higher qualification will be seen. This\nyear these amount to 92 per cent of the total, an all-time record. The group of\nteachers in the P-B category shows the greatest gain, reaching a total of 4,828, 610\ngreater than the previous year. Although the numbers of persons teaching without\ncertificate continue to show a slight increase, this may be more than compensated\nby an over-all reduction in actual pupil-teacher ratio.\nSupply of Commerce Teachers\nEvidence from surveys having shown that the shortage of qualified teachers of\ncommerce seemed to be the most acute of the specialist groups, an effort was made\nto recruit for an intensive teacher-education programme persons who had had several years of successful business experience. Well over 200 inquiries were dealt\nwith, and over 100 persons interviewed. The Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment\nchaired a planning and selection committee. It is anticipated that a class of nearly\n30 will have been enrolled at the University of British Columbia in the fall of 1967\nfor a special 12-month programme, including specific classroom observation and\npractice.\nTeacher Recruitment Advisory Committee\nThis Committee represents the Department of Education, the universities, the\nschool trustees, and the British Columbia Teachers' Federation, and is chaired by\nthe Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment. It held three meetings during the year,\nat which matters relating to teacher supply were considered, including a special\nBritish Columbia Teachers' Federation report on teacher supply and retention.\nJoint Board of Teacher Education\nThe Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment is one of four Department of Education representatives on this Board, which also represents school trustees, teachers,\nand universities. It has the power to make recommendations to the Board of Governors, the Senate, and the President of each university, and to the Minister of Education, with respect to Faculty of Education curriculum, staff appointments, and\nfacilities, and with respect to teacher education to the governing body of any other\ninstitutions of higher learning in the Province. The Board held four meetings during the year. Outstanding in its discussions were details of changing patterns of\nteacher-education programmes in this Province.\nTeacher Scholarships\nThe Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment acts as secretary to the selection\ncommittee which makes recommendations to the Minister of Education in regard\nto teacher scholarships. Two to four scholarships are awarded by the Government\neach year to teachers who have an outstanding classroom record. The intention of\nthe scholarship is to encourage deserving teachers to take specialized postgraduate\ncourses. This year scholarships went to Mr. I. R. McEown, Larson Elementary,\n TEACHER RECRUITMENT\nF 83\nNorth Vancouver; Mr. L. H. Morin, Port Coquitlam Secondary, New Westminster;\nand Mrs. L. De Jong, Oakridge School, Vancouver.\nOther Recruitment Activities\nThis year, as in other years, the Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment participated in the \" Trustee Days \" held at the University of British Columbia and the\nUniversity of Victoria, and also took part in other related conferences and met with\na number of other interested groups.\nGuidance Services\nThe Department of Education's guidance services to schools are entrusted to\nthis branch. During the year three mailings of vocational and other guidance materials were made to schools, accompanying three issues of a guidance bulletin. The\nbranch also answered a large number of individual inquiries concerning occupational\ninformation and special training facilities.\nA number of visits were made to school counselling projects, as well as to\nmeetings and conferences of counsellors. Contacts were maintained with such\nbodies as the British Columbia School Counsellors' Association and the British\nColumbia Guidance and Counselling Association. Once again the Co-ordinator of\nTeacher Recruitment instructed a summer-school class in group guidance methods\nat the University of Victoria during July.\nConsultation was provided to a number of professional and business groups in\nrelation to school guidance. Instances are the British Columbia Registered Nurses'\nAssociation, the Canadian Arthritis and Rheumatism Association, the Instrument\nSociety of America, the Council of the Forest Industries of British Columbia, Frontier College, the Vancouver Board of Trade.\nA significant project during the year concerns the Pupil Personnel Services\nCommittee, which is chaired by the Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment, and represents university, teacher, and Departmental opinion. The whole area of school\nguidance and counselling in relation to pupil personnel services generally was discussed, and a report on Committee findings was prepared in draft form.\nCentennial Youth Travel\nDuring the summer 19 \" units \" composed of 24 students and two escorts each\ntravelled from this Province to other parts of Canada, and a similar number from\nother Provinces were hosted in 17 centres\u00E2\u0080\u0094Alberni, Burnaby, Campbell River,\nCloverdale, Dawson Creek, Langley, Nelson, Sidney, Trail, Vancouver (three units),\nVernon, Victoria, and West Vancouver. Students from 99 schools travelled from\nBritish Columbia.\nLocal committees were set up, usually under the chairmanship of the District\nSuperintendent of Schools, with authority to select students to travel and arrange\nprogrammes for visitors. Plans were also laid for the exchange of 25 student groups\nduring the summer of 1967.\nThe Co-ordinator of Teacher Recruitment acted as Provincial co-ordinator for\nthe programme, providing information as required and managing the allocation of\nfunds for travelling and entertainment expense. The project as a whole is a joint\nCentennial effort of the Federal and Provincial Governments. Much credit for the\noutstanding success of the project must go to the many local groups and individuals,\nwhose hard work is greatly appreciated. Thanks must go also to the Canadian\nConfederation Centennial Committee of British Columbia, whose co-operation\nthrough assistance in clerical and accounting details did much to help the programme\nforward.\n F 84 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nTECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION\nREPORT OF J. S. WHITE, DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR CANADIAN\nVOCATIONAL TRAINING.\nIn general, this branch is becoming more and more complex with the continually\nexpanding training programmes, the increase in the number of other outside agencies\nwho are interested in participating in one way or another, and the resultant additional\ndemands being made on the branch for figures, training assistance, and general\ninformation. We are, in short, endeavouring to meet such a variety of requests that\nthe problem often arises as to how to accommodate demands which at times conflict\nwith each other in their requirements.\nExtensions to a number of our schools have been added to provide new and (or)\nadditional training facilities\u00E2\u0080\u0094namely, a large extension to the British Columbia\nInstitute of Technology which will almost double the student capacity and is expected\nto be ready by September, 1967.\nThe renting of and renovating of other buildings for the British Columbia Vocational Schools at Victoria and Burnaby which will also allow for a considerable\nincrease in enrolments.\nThe British Columbia Vocational School at Dawson Creek opened its doors\nin September, 1966, and will be formally opened by the Premier in August, 1967.\nTraining facilities for classroom-type courses were completed at Terrace for an\nanticipated opening in 1967/68, whilst plans were nearing completion for new\nschools at Victoria and Kamloops.\nThe Federal-Provincial Training Programme terminated on March 31, 1967,\nand is not being renewed in the form which has served the Province well over a considerable number of years. Instead the Federal authorities propose to purchase\nvocational training on an individual basis for persons approved through the Canada\nManpower offices. Such persons will have to qualify as adults according to certain\ncriteria laid down by the Federal Government.\nDuring the past year many meetings were held at which interested representatives of business, industry, and labour considered new programmes proposed for\nvarious British Columbia Vocational Schools or modifications of existing programmes. The following were approved and are in varying stages of being implemented at the listed vocational schools: Agriculture\u00E2\u0080\u0094Dawson Creek; Camp Cooks\nand Guides Training\u00E2\u0080\u0094Prince George; Data Processing, Draughting, Electronics,\nOffice Machine Repair, and Oil Burner Servicing\u00E2\u0080\u0094Victoria; Instrument Trade and\nMachinist's Trade\u00E2\u0080\u0094Burnaby.\nBecause of lack of response, the Service Station Attendants' Course at the\nBritish Columbia Vovational School at Burnaby was discontinued in April of 1967.\nProgramme 1\nThis programme provides for approved technical and vocational programmes\nin technical, industrial, commerical, agricultural, community services, visual and\nperforming arts, and other occupational fields.\nConstruction\nThirty-four districts qualify for Federal assistance to provide buildings and\nequipment under the Vocational Schools Assistance Act. Seventy-eight projects in\n Draughting, Burnaby\n F 86 PUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\n68 schools are scheduled for completion, to a gross total of $31,000,000, providing\nfacilities for technical, commercial, industrial, community services, visual and\nperforming arts fields, and programmes for particular occupations.\nThe Vocational Schools Assistance Act Amendment Act, 1965, requires that\nthe School Board provide 10 per cent, the Province 22.5 per cent, and the Federal\nGovernment 67.5 per cent of the capital cost. Progress of capital projects to date\nis as follows: Projects completed or near completion, 78; all projects with the\nexception of three new schools will be in operation by September, 1967; Prince\nGeorge Secondary, Vernon Secondary, and Courtenay Secondary are all completely\nnew schools and will be in operation by December, 1967.\nConsiderable additional vocational facilities are in the process of near completion in schools where Programme 1 funds are not available and are being provided by moneys from local referendum.\nThe basic standards regarding buildings and equipment for vocational facilities\nin the secondary schools are the same whether the financing is under referendum\nprocedures or Programme 1.\nThese are optimum facilities and may be pro-rated according to local requirements and enrolment in small districts.\nStaffing\nThe 1966/67 survey indicated that 111 teachers would be required for September, 1967. The graduating class from the industrial education accelerated programme at the University of British Columbia numbered 57.\nRecruitment\nThe forecast need for industrial education teachers in September, 1968, is 95.\nEighty-four persons have been recruited for training during the 1967/68 year, 70\nsponsored by Canada Manpower and 14 by the Province.\nIn-service Education\nThe in-service programme proposed for July, 1967, to be held in Kelowna,\nwas cancelled because of lack of applicants.\nThe pre-registration returns for the Department of Education in-service education courses at Kelowna Secondary School during the 1967 summer vacation are\nas follows: Industrial Science, 8; Industrial Power, 11; Junior Programmes, 7;\nConstruction, 4; Mechanics, 5; Electricity-Electronics 1.\nIn lieu of the cancelled workshop, it is proposed to develop material in the\nform of teaching suggestions for Industrial Science, Industrial Power, Power\nMechanics, and Electricity 8. This material will be distributed to all districts\nthrough the Division of Instruction.\nSecondary Schools\nThis past school-year, 1966/67, has been one of great expansion and frustration. Many of the senior secondary-school shops that should have been completed\nearly in the school-year were held up by the carpenters' strike and the lockout. Several were not ready for use until nearly Easter. New or expanded facilities have\nbeen provided for industrial education in the following districts: Cranbrook, Kimberley, Nelson, Castlegar, Trail, South Okanagan, Keremeos, Golden, Revelstoke,\nSalmon Arm, Kelowna, Kamloops, Barriere, Birch Island, Williams Lake, Lillooet,\nMerritt, Fraser Canyon, Chilliwack, Langley, Surrey, Delta, Richmond, Vancouver,\n TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION\nF 87\nNew Westminster, Maple Ridge, Coquitiam, North Vancouver, Powell River, Terrace, Smithers, Burns Lake, Vanderhoof, McBride, Peace River North, Greater\nVictoria, Sooke, Saanich, Cowichan, Lake Cowichan, Nanaimo, Qualicum, Alberni,\nCourtenay, Mission, Summerland, Ucluelet-Tofino, and Creston-Kaslo.\nDuring the year, industrial education courses in Grade XII were offered for\nthe first time. The lack of facilities during the first months of the year created a\nmost difficult teaching and learning situation for shop teachers, particularly for\nbeginning teachers without experience. It was gratifying to see how the men rose\nto the situation and made good progress in most cases.\nJourneymen called in last June to take a summer-school course and start\nteaching in September, on the whole, did a fine job. Their experience in their trade\ngave them a confidence that overcame their lack of teacher-training.\nA series of workshops were held to up-grade teachers and to prepare them to\nbetter handle the new material included in Industrial Power, Industrial Science,\nConstruction, Mechanics, and Electronics Courses.\nEnrolments in the several industrial education subjects in junior secondary\nschools numbered 53,533, and those in senior secondary schools numbered 23,256.\nEnrolments in occupational classes numbered 4,848 approximately.\nProgramme 2\nTraining in the technological field is offered under this programme, all of\nwhich is conducted at the British Columbia Institute of Technology in Burnaby.\nThis is post-secondary education in the technical area but does not include university\nprogrammes. Candidates require secondary-school graduation in English, Mathematics, and Science and undergo a two-year programme of not less than 2,400 hours.\nEnrolments for 1966/67 show percentage increases in the day enrolment of\n15 per cent, and for the night school, 425 per cent.\nEnrolment at the British Columbia Institute of Technology\nTechnology\nBroadcast Communications\t\nBuilding \t\nEnrolment\n67\n54\nBusiness Management 224\nChemical and metallurgical\nCivil and Structural\t\nElectrical and Electronics __\nFood Processing\t\nForestry \t\nForest Products\t\nNatural Gas and Petroleum\t\nHotel, Motel and Restaurant Management\nInstrumentation \t\nMechanical \t\nMining \t\nSurveying\nMedical Laboratory No. 3 _\nMedical Laboratory No. 4 ___\nMedical Radiography No. 1\nMedical Radiography No. 2\nMedical Radiography No. 3\n62\n55\n126\n40\n62\n54\n28\n66\n58\n85\n34\n50\n60\n81\n22\n23\n29\n British Columbia Institute of Technology. Business Management\u00E2\u0080\u0094console\nexercises on 1620 computer.\nBritish Columbia Institute of Technology. Radiography\u00E2\u0080\u0094instruction on X-ray\nunit with \" phantom \" in position for pelvic X-ray.\n TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION\nF 89\nEnrolment at the British Columbia Institute of Technology\u00E2\u0080\u0094Continued\nTechnology Enrolment\nMedical Radiography No. 4 21\nMedical Radiography No. 5 27\nMedical Radiography No. 6 28\nTotal day-school enrolment 1,356\nTotal night-school enrolment\t\nProgramme 3\n1,700\nThe bulk of vocational training programmes are conducted under this programme at many centres. Trade training and the equivalent in the areas of commerce and services, all at varying levels of advancement, is provided and aimed at\nequipping persons with a basic skill or improving an already acquired skill so as\nto enable such persons to compete successfully in the labour market.\nThe Provincial regional schools are the backbone of this type of training, but\na number of smaller courses are held as, when, and where required.\nEnrolment statistics for the regional vocational schools are shown at the end\nof this section, but the following are items of interest which occurred during the\nyear.\nBritish Columbia Vocational School\u00E2\u0080\u0094Burnaby\nAdditional classes in Basic Training for Skill Development, Court Reporting,\nAircraft Maintenance (reduced to 12 months), Commercial Up-grading, Industrial\nInstrumentation and Welding, Structural Steel, Bricklaying, Carpentry, Chef Training, Electrical, Steamfitting, and Millwright, whilst preparations are well advanced\nto introduce a Machinists' Course in the new school-year.\nThe Service Station Attendants' Course was discontinued because of a poor\nresponse from prospective students.\nModification in course length and (or) content was made in the Electrical\nAppliance Repair, Chef General, and Chef Patissier Courses.\nThere was an over-all increase in student day enrolment of some 24 per cent,\nthe night-school enrolments remaining firm, the latter offering new courses in French\nPastry, Cake Decorating, Blueprint Reading for Glaziers, Vinyl Wall Covering,\nInterior Finishing (Carpentry), and Electric Heat Installation (Part III).\nFinally, no fewer than 1,516 persons were conducted round the school in 56\nseparate tours.\nBritish Columbia Vocational School\u00E2\u0080\u0094Kelowna\nEnrolment continues to increase, and special courses were held in conjunction\nwith several private companies.\nNew night-school courses in Basic Botany, Income Tax Deductions, Range\nManagement, Grape Growing, Machinery Repair and Maintenance, and Practical\nVeterinary were offered through the co-operation of the Department of Agriculture\nand other British Columbia Government personnel.\nBritish Columbia Vocational School\u00E2\u0080\u0094Nanaimo\nAn increase of 23 per cent over the previous year's student enrolment is reported for day students and over 50 per cent in night-school students.\nThis school continues to excel in the world of cooking and was awarded the\nprize for the most outstanding entry in the Centennial culinary competitions held\nin Toronto, overcoming considerable transportation problems to do so. The students\n r\nBritish Columbia Vocational School\u00E2\u0080\u0094Burnaby. Structural Steel\u00E2\u0080\u0094setting up\nguy wires for safety.\n TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION\nF 91\nwere also privileged to prepare the food for the British Columbia State Ball and\nState Dinner at Government House and were greatly honoured by the presence of\nHis Honour Lieutenant-Governor G. R. Pearkes and Mrs. Pearkes at their school\nChristmas dinner.\nBritish Columbia Vocational School\u00E2\u0080\u0094Nelson\nIn-service training for instructors was organized and conducted by staff members with the assistance of local individual and government personnel.\nA course for building service workers was satisfactorily carried out for the first\ntime at this school.\nThe Kootenay School of Art gained further recognition and awards by having\nall its ceramics entries accepted for exhibition at the International Exhibition in\nFaenza, Italy, with Lydia Makituk Pingwartuk being awarded third prize and the\nschool receiving a silver medal for its entry.\nMr. Santo Mignosa was awarded a Canada Council grant, and the school gratefully acknowledges scholarships granted again by the City of Nelson, the Kinsmen\nClub, the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, and the Nelson Daily News.\nCurriculum Development Division\nWork centred around the development of course outlines, instructional material,\nexaminations, and publicity materials.\nCourse outlines were drawn up for 25 different courses in the industrial, commercial, and service fields.\nNo less than 32 trades in the same three fields had instructional material produced, and manuals were developed for use by 28 widely varied courses.\nIn addition, several slide sets were produced, including several on various\ntechnologies and, of course, many black-and-white films.\nTwelve sets of examinations were developed in the tradesmen, interprovincial,\nand practical nursing areas.\nMuch publicity material was prepared and distributed throughout British\nColumbia, across Canada, and to numerous foreign countries.\nSeveral national reports, by various technical committees, were published.\nEnrolments in sundry courses offered outside the regional schools were as\nfollows: Waiter and Waitress, 210; Room Maids, 41; Air Brakes, 26; Real Estate\nAppraisal, 34; Vancouver Police Academy, 189; Forestry School, 44.\n Birtish Columbia Vocational School\u00E2\u0080\u0094Prince George Pr^tVoi xt \u00E2\u0096\u00A0\ninstruction in the anatomy ^J^^\u00E2\u0084\u00A2*-^\"\"\u00E2\u0084\u00A2*\n r\nF 94\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A23\nfi\nH_ ot!\n?\u00E2\u0096\u00A0 wo\nOrtWTfTtr.oovominO\wm^cni^nriNvOMTr^N^i\u00C2\u00BB\u00C2\u00AB^^r^N^t~--~-(SOcn^-Tt\nrH VJD (N Os -rf .\nC- rH r.\nmioMM\n. in oo oo in\n! i-H m CN\nt- O \"*0 >n\nV)rH Q0O\\nrH m Ti\n.as\n1 ! \u00C2\u00ABN\n! v\u00C2\u00A9 r- i\n' rH !\ni : o\n! O T4, \u00E2\u0080\u00A2\nI ^ 1\n-4 | | j\nCO\n&\no\nS\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A23\ni : : i i : oo i\ni t*% 1 i I I\ni ! ! 1 !\n! \n[t- j its\n: \"/\".\nOs r-\n. 1 o\\no th :\n: rn\nCN ^O\nCT\ rn\ni os f* o r-< m Tt\niii i\n*H\nj I-H\n\"\n) Q CA I\n) \u00E2\u0096\u00A0rj r-i I\nQ\n51\n5 ra \u00C2\u00AB\n&g|\nrt .2 1\nj_ ._ __ y\n3 O O \u00C2\u00A3\ng\u00C2\u00ABU2\nOOOO\n-_ M - _ 5 2\n__\n__ c\nS\ng\n_?S\u00C2\u00BB\nc__3 |\n50\n>_ |j8. a si.\nTi \u00C2\u00A3J _h tn cfl cfl rt\n5 rt rt rt rt o I\n3 3 5. 2\nSO\"3\n. O C 3\nmnn\nM 3 K.\nam g1\na_HE\nH-.E\nrt rt __ O\nuuoo\n1 8 9\n\u00C2\u00AB t_,\n; a> h_T\nto P\ncncnTtTiTttncooscAOsTi ti in m, cA ca cn ti ca t\ntn rH rH CS Cl W VO rH t-i\nr^t-oor-aoooovomoo\ncncn-Tj-cMcscNooovcNOv\nrn \o os co\nS I\n\D t~- t-\nin tn ca\nCA T-t\nI !\nI i\n! r- oo oo\ni oo cn co\ncn\nIS I I I ! I I I I\ni I\ni i r\u00C2\u00BB cs t-\n! vo cs tn\nMil!\n25\ntn cn tn\nso vo tn\nti tn tr-\n.3\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2a-a\nfl \u00C2\u00B0,\ndm'3 td\n.fl \"-* 3__ o\n\< 3\n-.S'.cdS\u00C2\u00AB_\nu 3 \"A\nifSli11\nrt O O Ohm*.\no c\nii\n-J 3\n-3 fl.\nB 3 V\n1 2,s\n3 90'\n>J1l\n^ rt rt\nS^AhA.\n1*1 * \u00C2\u00AB\nS fl & *> 2\nm fl > y -a\nrt fl \u00C2\u00A3 \u00C2\u00AB* Ih\n,__5 .fl o t-t (j\nPh Ph Ph Ph PQ\nO 4.\nE rt\ntJo^cSii^C\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2a w\nn\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0>.\nvo\ntn\nOv\noo\n_.\nov\nOV\ntn\noo\nov\no\n~^\nOv\n_.\nOV\nVO\no\nVO\nOV\nvo\n^.\nVD\nOv\n1962/63\n1963/64\n1964/65\n1965/66\n1966/67\nM.\nF.\nT.\nM.\nF.\nT.\nM.\nF.\nT.\nM.\nF.\nT.\n1\nM.I F.\n1\nT.\nla \t\n766\n378\n1,144\n549\n131\n680\n487\n120\n607\n(?)\n(?)\n525\n(?)\n(?)\n(?)\n985\n410\n1,395\n716\n135\n851\n657\n119\n776\n589\n16\n605\n46\n125\n171\n1,353\n523\n1,876\n967\n177\n1,144\n835\n199\n1,034\n787\n46\n833\n99\n114\n213\n1,635\n666\n2,301\n1,149\n200\n1,349\n1,026\n216\n1,242\n893\n47\n940\n145\n186\n331\n2,006\n798\n2,804\n1,416\n257\n1,673\n1,258\n266\n1,524\n1,009\n57\n1,066\n154\n326\n480\n2,127\n855\n2,982\n1,506\n266\n1,772\n1,371\n\t\n2,021\n957\n2,978\n1,451\n285\n1,736\n1,417\n316\n1,733\n1,056\n40\n1,096\n193\n473\n666\n412\n15\n427\n61\n168\n229\n673\n20\n693\n118\n483\n2,234\n1,172\n3,406\n1,664\n328\n1,992\n1,594\n329\n1,923\n1,085\n35\n1,120\n179\n651\n432\n12\n444\n100\n114\n770\n16\n786\n204\n460\n2,429\n1,297\n3,726\n1,793\n409\n2,192\n1,725\n378\n2,103\n1,202\n28\n1,230\n304\n603\n907\n\t\n\t\n2,382\n1,318\n3,700\n1,846\n377\n2,223\n1,729\n453\n2,182\n1,210\n33\n1,243\n228\n719\n947\n\t\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094\n2,426\nlb\t\n1,321\nlc\t\n2a\t\n3,747\n1,859\n2b\t\n2c\t\n3a\t\n\t\n\t\n426\n2,285\n3b\t\n3c.\n284\n1,655\n1,019\n63\n1,082\n181\n421\n602\n411\n8\n419\n79\n125\n704\n645\n32\n677\n114\n348\n462\n4a \t\n462\n9\n471\n67\n158\n225\n748\n24\n772\n161\n561\n722\n4b\t\n4c\t\n5a\t\n5b\t\n_\n5c.\n83012341673\nReferences: M._=male; F.=female; T.__;total.\n1. Teacher-training enrolments, in all years; (a) elementary training, (b) secondary training, (c) total.\nFigures are for the University of British Columbia and University of Victoria only. An additional 16 persons\n(11 men, 5 women) completed training at Simon Fraser University by September, 1966. Ten men and 2 women\nwith P-B certification went teaching, together with 2 women, 1 E-A and 1 P-C. One man with P-B and 1 woman\nwith E-B did not teach. A small group from Notre Dame University entered teaching in 1965. In 1966 a further 7 men and 10 women went teaching (men\u00E2\u0080\u00941 E-T, 4 E-B, 2 E-A; women\u00E2\u0080\u00942 E-T, 8 E-B). An additional\n6 women and 1 man did not teach (men\u00E2\u0080\u00941 E-B; women\u00E2\u0080\u00943 E-T, 1 E-C, 1 E-B, 1 E-A).\n2. Enrolled in training programmes likely leading to a certificate at end of year.\n(Note.\u00E2\u0080\u0094The above do not include those talcing emergency industrial arts and summer-session home economics training programme. The discrepancy between the total of 3c and totals of 4c plus 5c arise from the\nfact that some not included in 3c passed further work to be included in 4c plus 5c. Until 1964/65, University\nof Victoria students were included in elementary training above although some were secondary. The distortion\nis relatively small.)\n3. Listed by training-college at close of year, and teaching considered likely (includes those who may be\nconsidered for temporary certificates, but not those who failed the year or failed practice teaching and a limited\nnumber of special cases)\u00E2\u0080\u0094prior to summer session and supplementals.\n4. Number of those listed in 3 who were teaching as at November in school-year following training; (a)\nnumbers with regular certificates, (b) numbers with temporary certificates, (c) total\u00E2\u0080\u0094after summer session and\nsupplementals.\n5. Numbers of those listed in 3; (a) not teaching as at November but certificates issued, (b) not teaching\nand no certificate issued or requested, (c) total not teaching.\nIV. The following table shows the certificate classifications awarded those in\nthe training-college in the year shown who were teaching in November of the year\nfollowing; that is, actual supply from the training-college. Note that E-C supply\ndropped from 211 in 1959 to 38 in 1966, E-B supply is almost the same, and E-A\nsupply rose from 68 to 316. Similarly, P-C rose from 58 to 210 and P-B from\n155 to 329. (These figures include certificated teachers who may have left teaching\nto return for further winter-session training in the Faculty of Education in the year\nshown.) The supply obtained from the teacher-education institutions was almost\nunchanged over the past year. There was also a slight reduction in the past year\nof those with P-C or higher certification. Demand has risen significantly in recent\nyears.\nOv\nV.\n-v.\nCO\nu.\nOv\n\u00C2\u00A9\nVO\n^-.\nOv\ntn\nOV\nvo\no\nVO\nOv\nVO\n^-\nVO\nOv\n1962/63\n1963/64\n1964/65\n1965/66\nM.\nW.\nT.\nM.\nW.\nT.\nM.\nW.\nT.\nM.\nW.\nT.\nE-T-\t\nF,-r!\n45\n211\n292\n68\n1\n58\n155\n3\n44\n186\n387\n101\n3\n55\n155\n9\n48\n187\n438\n79\n9\n92\n206\n7\n53\n129\n435\n132\n10\n84\n234\n5\n8\n30\n87\n63\n2\n48\n171\n6\n32\n69\n270\n136\n2\n85\n81\n2\n40\n99\n357\n199\n4\n133\n256\n8\n9\n20\n73\n75\n7\n45\n196\n2\n19\n53\n237\n196\n1\n93\n89\n5\n28\n73\n300\n271\n8\n138\n285\n7\n6\n22\n61\n59\n6\n67\n221\n2\n16\n46\n236\n234\n120\n131\n3\n22\n68\n297\n293\n6\n187\n352\n5\n9\n10\n78\n73\n7\n67\n223\n4\n24\n28\n227\n243\n143\n106\n1\n33\n38\np-n\n305\nF,-A\n316\nS-T\n7\nP-c\n210\nP-B\n329\nP-A\n5\nTotals\n833\n940\n1,066\n1,082\n419\n677\n1,096\n427\n693\n1,120\n444\n786\n1,230\n471\n772\n1,243\n OFFICE OF REGISTRAR AND DIVISION OF EXAMINATIONS\nF 115\nV. The following chart shows the certificate classification of those in the\ntraining-college in the year shown who were not teaching in November following.\nE-T and S-T indicates that had the individual taught, a letter of permission would\nhave been required. The figures do not include those who would not have received\na certificate or been considered for a letter of permission, nor those in programmes\nnot normally leading to certification; for example, first-year elementary, various\nyears secondary. Note that the numbers of persons eligible for a certificate who\ndid not enter teaching the September following rose from 201 in 1959 to 799 in\n1966, and that in the same period the level of certificate classification of those individuals rose significantly. In part, the figures reflect the decision of trainees to\nundertake extended training for higher qualifications before commencing teaching,\nevident in other figures available. The process, temporarily at least, is aggravating\nnumerical supply in terms of demand but may be creating a pool of longer-trained\npersons who may be expected to enter teaching within the next year or two, thereby\nincreasing numerical supply and quality supply. However, in 1966, of 651 persons\nqualified with P-C or higher certification, 107 did not teach (16.4 per cent). Sixty-\nfour of these hold P-B or higher certification. An almost identical situation pertained in 1965.\nOv\nm\noo\ntn\nOv\no\nVO\n^_\nOV\ntn\nOv\nVO\n**.\no\nvO\nOv\nVO\n\\nVO\nOv\n1962/63\n1963/64\n1964/65\n1965/66\nM.\nW.\nT.\nM.\nW.\nT.\nM.\nW.\nT.\nM.\nW.\nT.\nE-T _\t\n11\n56\n81\n30\n1\n10\n23\n1\n95\n58\n83\n49\n4\n18\n23\n1\n128\n98\n157\n48\n7\n16\n26\n141\n130\n196\n73\n9\n19\n34\n28\n52\n47\n40\n1\n13\n23\n102\n89\n178\n65\n6\n15\n6\n130\n141\n225\n105\n7\n28\n29\n42\n52\n54\n31\n8\n14\n27\n1\n102\n117\n246\n84\n5\n26\n21\n144\n169\n300\n115\n13\n40\n48\n1\n35\n39\n68\n40\n4\n17\n30\n1\n79\n119\n295\n120\n3\n22\n33\n2\n114\n158\n363\n160\n7\n39\n63\n3\n26\n32\n61\n47\n8\n15\n35\n1\n107\n110\n313\n129\n7\n28\n28\n133\nE-C _\n142\nE-B\nF-A\n374\n176\nS-T\t\n15\nP-C\n43\nP-B _ -.\n63\nP-A\t\n1\nTotal-\n213\n201\n331\n232\n480\n345\n602\n452\n204\n175\n462\n354\n666\n529\n229\n179\n601\n494\n830\n673\n234\n195\n673\n591\n907\n786\n225\n191\n722\n608\n947\nTotal eligible for certificate-\n799\nTotals, E-T, S-T\t\n12\n99\n135\n150\n29\n108\n137\n50\n107\n157\n39\n82\n121\n34\n114\n148\nVI. From the preceding tables can be calculated supply from the training\ncolleges as a percentage of demand:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\ntn\ntO\nr-\n00\nOs\n^\nc-\ntn\ntn\nx.\ntn\noo\ntn\nOv\nOs\nOs\nOv\nOs\nOS\n-*\n1-1\n,H\n1\nTi\nT-i\nn\nla\t\n553\n831\n960\n607\n776\n1,034\n1,242\n1,524\n1,655\n.1,733\n1,923\n2,103\n2,182\nlb.....\t\n522\n816\n920\n525\n605\n833\n940\n1,066\n1,082\n1,096\n1,120\n1,230\n1,243\n2\t\n1,637\n(?)\n1,860\n1,802\n2,007\n2,048\n1,957\n2,170\n2,371\n2,561\n2,646\n3,079\n3,440\n3 a ... ..\n33.8\n(?)\n51.6\n33.7\n38.7\n50.5\n63.5\n70.2\n69.8\n67.7\n65.5\n68.3\n63.4\n3b_\n31.9\n(?)\n49.5\n29.1\n29.9\n40.7\n48.0\n49.1\n45.6\n42.8\n42.3\n39.9\n36.1\nla. Numbers in training-college listed in June previous as likely available to teach in September of school-\nyear shown.\nlb. Numbers in training-college in June previous actually teaching in October of school-year shown.\n2. Numbers needed in September to staff new positions and replace drop-outs from June previous; that is,\nteacher demand. This does not include further replacements required during the school-year.\n3a. Numbers listed in training-college in June as a percentage of demand; that is, la as a percentage of 2.\n3b. Numbers from training-college who taught, as a percentage of demand; that is, lb as a percentage of\n2\u00E2\u0080\u0094actual training-college supply as a percentage of demand.\n F 116\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nTeacher Recruitment in the United Kingdom\nA District Superintendent of Schools (District No. 57) proceeded overseas\nto carry out recruitment in the United Kingdom in 1966. Again in 1967 arrangements were made for a District Superintendent to recruit similarly.\nSchool Boards are encouraged to list the number of specific positions available.\n(1) These lists are used by the interviewing officer, who offers appointment\ndirect to one of these positions.\n(2) On return from the United Kingdom the interviewing officer provided the\nRegistrar with a list of suitable persons interviewed for whom appointments had not been made. This special listing was circulated to District\nSuperintendents and Boards in order that direct negotiations and appointments might be made.\n(3) A number of other individuals worked independently of the interviewing\nofficer and in many cases came direct to the Province or were appointed\ndirect by Boards, although negotiations commenced under the recruitment plan.\nThe chart below indicates these refinements of recent years. Figures for official\nUnited Kingdom recruitment are as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nCertificate\nElementary certificates\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nBy interviewing officer-\nSpecial list-\nIndependent\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nTotals...\n20\n21\n21\n20\n12\n43\n23\n49\nSecondary certificates\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nBy interviewing officer-\nSpecial list-\nIndependent\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nTotals-\nGrand totals-\n21\n30 |\n48\n61 |\n33\n35\n||\n~\\n\t\n..._.\n\u00E2\u0080\u0094.\nz:\n41\n35 |\n33\n30 |\n35\n27\n62\n65 | 81\n91\n68 | 62\n20\n19\n32\n41\n53\n115\n14\n21\n21\n\t\n\t\n\t\n14\n5\n13\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n7\n18\n9\n15\n14\n28\n33\n52\n29\n34\n46\n86 | 167\nIn addition to the above group, an indefinite number of teachers from the\nUnited Kingdom proceed annually to this Province.\nTeacher Exchange\nTeacher-exchange applications proceed through the Registrar's office. The\nnumber of applications from British Columbia teachers annually exceed the exchange\npositions available. Exchanges in recent years were as follows:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nOv\ntn\n00\nOv\nO\nSO\nOs\ntn\nOs\n\u00C2\u00A9\nSO\nOs\nto\nOs\ncn\nto\nso\nOs\nsQ\nm\nSO\nOs\ntn\nso\nOs\nSO\nSO\n**>\n^0\nOs\ntn\nso\nm\nOs\ntn\nOv\nso\nsO\nSO\nOs\n22\n4\n5\n23\n1\n1\n26\n2\n1\n26\n2\n28\n1\n1\n23\n1\n1\n22\n1\n22\n1\n23\n20\n2\n24\n2\nTotals \t\n31\n25\n29\n28\n30\n25\n23\n23\n23\n22\n26\n OFFICE OF REGISTRAR AND DIVISION OF EXAMINATIONS\nF 117\nDivision of Examinations\nThere have been a number of changes in examinations during the past two\nyears, phasing out the last examinations structured in Grades XI-XII for University\nProgramme graduation and adjusting these to the new Academic-Technical Programme graduation requirements, which will result in only 11 examinations at the\nGrade XII level in the next school-year. This year, for the first time, school students required to write Grade XII Departmental examinations received final standing based on the average of a mark assigned by the school plus the mark earned on\nthe Departmental examination, each of equal weighting. In addition, Grade XII\nstudents writing for scholarship purposes were required to write examinations only\nin their two best subjects rather than the previous requirement of Grade XII English and three other subjects. However, for the first time students wrote a special\nscholarship examination which consisted of the regular examination plus a special\nscholarship section, each of equal weighting. With these new provisions for writing\nonly in best subjects and on a reduced number, there was an expected increase in\nthe averages obtained by students under these requirements.\nUntil 1965/66 there was an annual increase in candidates registered with the\nDivision, with considerable administrative time in marking, tabulating, and releasing\nresults. A reduction in candidates and subjects examined is under way but with\ncertain increases in administration with the use of combined school and examination\nmarks and special scholarship examinations. The phasing-out of former programmes led to some increase in candidates registered in 1966/67. The following\ntables give significant data:\u00E2\u0080\u0094\nNumber of Markers\nin\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2<*\n\0\nm\nOs\n00\ntn\n\"v.\nr-\nas\nOs\ntn\nCO\nm\nOs\no\nto\n\u00E2\u0080\u00A2\"^\nOs\nin\nOs\nto\no\nsO\nOs\nso\nOs\ncn\nso\n\"-S\nr)\nSO\nOs\no\ntn\nSO\nOS\nm\nso\n\\nr\u00C2\u00A3\n_P\nOs\nSO\nso\ntn\nso\nOs\nVD\nVO\nVD\nOv\nJune\t\nAugust\t\n243\n41\n246\n44\n290\n48\n301\n50\n343\n61\n395\n61\n439\n19\n511\n16\n562\n15\n519\n15\n344\n11\nTotals\t\n284] 290l 338l 351\n404| 456| 458| 527\n577\n534\n355\nApprox. costs\n$113-00OlS123_000l$153.O00!\u00C2\u00A3168_O0O\nS179.000IS212.500IS210.000\n$251,500\n$297,0001 | \t\n1 !\nNumber of Candidates (June)\nGrade XII\nGrade XIII-\n10,924\n1,565\n13,014\n1,797\n14,933 1 16,786\n2,204 | 2,673\n19,113 | 20,103 22,411 | 25,793\n3,253 | 3,597 f 4,044 | 4,157\n28,246\n4,792\n18,586\n3,068\n21,952\n2,784\nTotals\t\n12,489\n14,811\n17,137\n19,459\n22,366 | 23,700\n1\n26,455 | 29,950\n33,038\n21,654\n24,736\nNumber Completed in June\nGrade XII .\nGrade XIII...\n3,433\n383\n4,025\n341\nI\n4,215 |\n464 |\n4,720\n587\n5,651 |\n620\n5,779\n659\n1\n6,827 |\n840 |\n7,840\n809\n9,490\n936\n9,870\n733\n10,722\n602\nTotals\n3,816\n4,366\n4,679 |\n1\n5,307\n6,271 |\n1\n6,438\n7,667 |\nI\n8,649\n10,426\n10,603\n11,324\nPapers Marked in June\nGrade XW-\n36,236\n8,055\n41,963\n9,751\n49,318\n13,812\n!\ni\n4,927\nGrade XII\t\nGrade XIII.\n24,024\n5,647\n29,765\n6,388\n46,227\n11,974\n54,488\n15,649\n62,654\n15,995\n60,333\n18,825\n38,919\n12,278\n24,676\n10,534\nTotals\t\n29,671\n36,153\n44,291\n51,714\n58,201\n63,130\n70,137\n78,649\n79,158\n51,197\n40,137\nl School section.\n F 118\nPUBLIC SCHOOLS REPORT, 1966/67\nPapers Marked in August\nr-\nV)\n*\u00E2\u0096\u00A0>\nvo\ntn\nOS\n00\no\ntn\nON\nOs\nm\n\\n00\nin\nOs\no\nSO\nOs\ntn\nOs\nSO\no\nVO\nOs\n(S\nSO\n->,\nSO\nOS\ncn\nso\n\"V\nrg\nso\nOs\nSO\n\u00E2\u0096\u00A0\\nm\n'A?\nOs\nm\nso\nSO\nOS\nso\nso\n\u00C2\u00ABn\nsO\nOs\nt-\n "Legislative proceedings"@en . "J110.L5 S7"@en . "1968_V01_09_F1_F183"@en . "10.14288/1.0364474"@en . "English"@en . "Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library"@en . "Victoria, BC : Government Printer"@en . "Images provided for research and reference use only. For permission to publish, copy or otherwise distribute these images please contact the Legislative Library of British Columbia"@en . "Original Format: Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. Library. Sessional Papers of the Province of British Columbia"@en . "PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Ninety-sixth Annual Report 1966/67"@en . "Text"@en . ""@en .